ML18153B626

Summarizes 890126 Enforcement Conference Re Design Control & Corrective Action Problems Affecting Various Plant Sys.List of Meeting Attendees & Viewgraphs Encl

ML18153B626
Person / Time
Site:	Surry
Issue date:	02/22/1989
From:	Ernst M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Cartwright W VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
References
NUDOCS 8903090172
Download: ML18153B626 (68)

Text

.

• • /

e FEB 2 2 1989 Virginia Electric and Power Company ATTN:

Mr. W. R. Cartwright, Vice President, Nuclear Operations 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE

SUMMARY

e

'-11 t;lt*

This letter refers to the Enforcement Conference held at our request on January 26, 1989.

This meeting concerned activities authorized for your Surry facility.

The issues discussed at this conference related to design control and corrective action problems affecting various plant systems.

A list of attendees, a summary, and a copy of your handout are enclosed.

We are continuing our review of these issues to determine the appropriate enforcement action.

In accordance with 2.790 of the NRC's 11 Rules of Practice, 11 Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document 8oom.

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact us.

Enclosures:

1.

List of Attendees

2.

Meeting Summary

3.

Handout cc w/encls:

M. R. Kansler, Station Manager R. F. Saunders, Manager - Nuclear Programs and Licensing Commonwealth of Virginia bee w/encls:

NRC Resident Inspector DRS Technical Assistant Document Control Desk RII RII (L Sc:..

().:/)

MLewis PFredrickson 02/tl; /89 02/\\h/89 RII

~011 02/l &/89 1'.t

\\,

l

• .*.i

__ ]_._*,:-_:,.

,**,*.I,_,

Sincerely, Original signed by J. Philip Stohr (for)

Malcolm L. Ernst Acting Regional Administrator RITJ/lf

&~

02//6 /89 RII AGibs~n 02/ /89

'.'.; Ef?-&*l

$URRY 1,2 VE&PCo

' Eri£orcement Confer~nce Summary

,i~~'d w/ltr dtd 02/22/89... 8903090172

-NOTICE-THE A TI ACHED FILES ARE OFFICIAL RE-CORDS

• OF THE RECORDS & REPORTS MANAGEMENTBRANCH. THEYHAVEBEEN CHARGED TO YOU FOR A LIMITED TIME PERIOD AND MUST BE RETUFNED TO THE

. RECORDS & ARCHIVES SERVICES SECTION P1-122 WHITE FLINT.

PLEASE DO NOT SEND DOCUMENTS

. CHARGED OUT THROUGH THE MAIL.

REMOVAL OF ANY PAGE(S) FROM DOCUMENT FOR REPRO-DUCTION MUST BE.REFERRED TO FILE*

PERSONNEL..

-NOTICE~

ENCLOSURE 1 ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE LIST OF ATTENDEES Virginia Electric and Power Company W. Cartwright, Vice President - Nuclear Operations F. Moore, Vice President 7 Engineering M. Kansler, Station Manager - Surry G. Pannell, Director - Safety Evaluation and Control E. Grecheck, Assistant Station Manager - Surry R. Calder, Manager - Nuclear Engineering R. Saunders, Manager - Nuclear Programs and Licensing R. Hardwick, Manager - Corporate Quality Assurance D. Sommers, Supervisor - Licensing Nuclear Regulatory Commission M. Ernst, Acting Regional Administrator, Region II (RII)

L. Reyes, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), RII C. Hehl, Deputy Director, DRP, RII A. Gibson, Director, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS), RII E. Adensam, Assistant Director - RII Reactors, Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)

W. Troskoski, Enforcement Coordinator, Office of Enforcement B. Wilson, Branch Chief, DRP, RII R. Borchardt, Region II Coordinator, Executive._ Director for Operations T. Conlon, Section Chief, DRS, RII F. Cantrell, Section Chief, DRP, RI!

P. Fredrickson, Section Chief, DRP, RII F. Jape, Section Chief, DRS, RII G. Belisle, Section Chief, DRS, RII M. Shymlock, Section Chief, DRS, RII J. Wermiel, Section Chief, NRR B. Buckley, Project Manager, NRR W. Holland, Senior Resident Inspector, DRP, RII L. Nicholson, Resident Inspector, DRP, RII B. Uryc, Senior Enforcement Coordinator, Enforcement and Investigation Coordination Staff, RII M. Lewis, Project Engineer, DRP, RII M. Scott, Project Engineer, DRP, RII S. Shaeffer, Project Engineer, DRP, RII L. Lawyer, Reactor Inspector, DRS, RII T. Cooper, Reactor Inspector, DRS, RII L. Mellen, Reactor Inspector, DRS, RII

ENCLOSURE 2 ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE MEETING

SUMMARY

An Enforcement Conference was held at the NRC's Region II Office with Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO) on January 26, 1989, to discuss weaknesses identified in design control and examples of failure to take prompt and comprehensive corrective action.

Included in these discussions were concerns identified with intake canal inventory, service water systems, low and high head safety injection systems, reactor cavity seal, recirculation spray heat exchangers, control room ventilation, and special nµclear material inventory.

The NRC Acting Regional Administrator opened the meeting by expressing concerns of the number and range of issues under consideration for enforcement action.

The Regional Administrator stated that these issues, coupled with previous escalated enforcement actions, indicated that management problems existed.

VEPCO's Vice President of Nuclear Operations expressed similar concerns regarding the issues under consideration, and stated that VEPCO hopes to convince the NRC that management is now, and will continue to be, aggressive.

The focus of the remainder of the Enforcement Conference was on:

(1) root cause evaluation and corrective actions, (2) inadequate design and design configuration control, and (3) failure to take appropriate corrective actions.

In discussions of root cause evaluation, VEPCO stated that the common threads of the various issues under consideration were inadequate design control and inadequate corrective action program.

VEPCO outlined corrective actions for these inadequacies, including higher management standards, enhanced sensitivity to events, detailed 10 CFR 50.59 reviews, organizational. changes, and institution of a Configuration Management Program and Operational Readiness Assurance Program.

VEPCO stated that culture changes are being made at the management level, and that management's direct interface with workers in the field is one process being used to change the culture of the plant workers.

In response to in NRC concern of the magnitude of work described as corrective action and the present plant startup schedule,. VEPCO stated that the work requiring completion had priority over the schedule for plant startup.

The discussion then focused on inadequate design and design control issues.

Included in these discussions were problems with the intake canal inventory, emergency service water pumps, service water heat exchangers, recirculation spray heat exchangers, reactor cavity seal, and low head safety injection system valves.

VEPCO stated that, although it may have taken a whne-to identify design problems, once identified, immediate corrective actions were timely, comprehensive, and of a broad scope.

To solve programmatic problems relating to design, VEPCO plans to strengthen onsite engineering and establish a Configuration Management Program.

This program, and its implementation schedule, were discussed in greater detail following the Enforcement Conference (see handout in Enclosure 3).

,1 2

Several issues were discussed relating to failure to take appropriate corrective action, including reactor cavity seal failure, potential gas binding of high head safety injection pumps, control room chiller and air conditioning capacities, and special nuclear material inventory.

VEPCO stated that many of these issues were the result of culture problems, and that increased sensitivity to these problems was evident.

In the closing remarks, VEPCO's Vice President of Nuclear Operations expressed a commitment to change the culture of those involved in the operation of Surry.

VIRGINIA POWER NRC /VIRGINIA POWER CONFERENCE.

JANUARY 26, 1989 IT1

z

c C,

J>

z 0

C,

(/)

0 C:

C:

o

-I fTl w

AGENDA I. INTRODUCTION II. NRC ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE A. Root Cause Evaluation/Corrective Actions

8. Inadequate Design/Design Configuration Control C. Failure To Take Appropriate Corrective Action D. Enforcement Issues - Closing Statements Ill. OTHER ISSUE STATUS A. Non-OEM Parts B. Safety Related MOV Inspection Status C. Restart Issue Status IV. Configuration Management Program V. CONCLUDING REMARKS

\\.

• I':

I

,*:.,*,*~

l*':,

,,...,~,

r

.l,

-~;_'

• ~

\\?Nsi:tr:8iO's~E EVA.LuAi1dN!C0 1R:R'E6T1VE ACTIONS

..:'. :f..,

\\

,i

• 1

• • ~

M.R.KANSLER STATION MANAGER - SURRY

ROOT CAUSE EVALUATION

• COMMON CHARACTERISTICS

• CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

COMMON CHARACTERISTICS

• INADEQUATE DESIGN CONTROLS ORIGINAL PLANT DESIGN BASIS

- TRANSLATION OF DESIGN BASES INTO OPERATING DOCUMENTS CONSIDERATION OF DESIGN BASIS IN MODIFICATIONS/EVALUATIONS

• , INADEQUATE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAMS AWARENESS AND IDENTIFICATION SENSITIVITY EVALUATION DOCUMENTATION VERIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

• MANAGEMENT STANDARDS

• . ENHANCED SENSITIVITY TO OPERATIONAL AND DESIGN EVENTS

.

• THOROUGH REVIEW OF OPERATIONAL EVENTS

• DETAILED 50.59 REVIEW PROCESS

• ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES

• CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

• OPERATIONAL READINESS ASSURANCE PROGRAM

MANAGEMENT STANDARDS MARKED IMPROVEMENT ACHIEVED WITH CONTINUING PROGRESS

• CULTURE CHANGE

• LOWER TOLERANCE FOR LONG STANDING PROBLEMS I.

1 HIGHER EXPECTATIONS

• INCREASED COMMUNICATIONS INTERNAL EXTERNAL

• TESTING PHILOSOPHY

ENHANCED SENSITIVITY

• MEETI_NGS WITH STATION PERSONNEL COMPLETE SEPTEMBER 1988

• MEETINGS WITH SUPERVISION COMPLETE SEPTEMBER 1988

• POTENTIAL PROBLEM REPORT PROCESS REFOCUSED SEPTEMBER 1988

• LOWER REPORTING THRESHOLD INSTITUTED FALL 1988

• HIGHER AWARENESS IN FIELD INSTITUTED FALL 1988

THOROUGH REVIEW OF OPERATIONAL EVENTS

• INCREASE RESOURCES AUGUMENTED IN OCTOBER AND DECEMBER1988

• IMPROVED REVIEWS OF DEVIATIONS

. INITIATED OCTOBER 1988

• INTERDISCIPLINE REVIEW TEAMS RHR PUMP O.SCILLICATIONS SEPTEMBER 1988 SPENT FUEL POOL TRANSFER DOOR OCTOBER 1988 LOW HEAD SAFETY INJECTION MOVs DECEMBER 1988

• DEPARTMENTAL EVENT REVIEW ENHANCED FALL 1988

DETAILED 50.59 REVIEW PROCESS

• STATION PROCEDURES REVISED NOVEMBER 1987.

• TRAINING COMPLETED DECEMBER 1987

• CROSS FUNCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT TEAM ESTABLISHED JULY 1987

• $?0 1RPO~ATE STANDARD IN MANAGEMENT REVIEW

[,,

I "I

I !

I

ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES

• ENGINEERING CONSOLIDATION COMPLETE JANUARY 1, 1989

• OUTAGE PLANNING ORGANIZATION PILOT PROGRAM SEPTEMBER 1988 APPROVED DECEMBER 21, 1988

• LICENSING AND SAFETY RESOURCES AUGUMENTED SEPTEMBER 1988 ADDITIONS AUTHORIZED JANUARY 1989

• INDEPENDENT/OPERATIONAL EVENT REVIEW RESOURCES AUTHORIZED JANUARY 1989

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

• DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION

• DOCUMENT AND MAINTAIN THE DESIGN BASIS, INCLUDING RECONSTITUTION WHEN NECESSARY

• RECONCILE THE FACILITY PHYSICAL CONFIGURATION WITH THE DESIGN BASIS

• RECONCILE THE FACILITY OPERATING DOCUMENTS WITH THE DESIGN BASIS

OPERATION READINESS ASSURANCE PROGRAM

• SYSTEM WALKDOWNS

• EMERGENCY POWER TESTING *

• FUNCTIONAL TESTS.

• DOCUMENTATION REVIEW

• CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES

SYSTEM WALKDOWNS

• SYSTEM SELECTION BY MUL Tl DISCIPLINE TEAM DECEMBER 1988

• EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURE BASED.

• THIRTY-FIVE (35) SYSTEMS -- 123 DRAWINGS

• PERFORMED BY SYSTEM ENGINEERS

• NO MAJOR SAFETY SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED

• TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO STARTUP

EMERGENCY POWER TESTING

• DEAD BUS TEST

• INTEGRATED LOGIC/FUNCTIONAL EMERGENCY POWER TEST

• COMPONENT POWER SUPPLY TESTING

• . EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR TESTING

• TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO STARTUP

FUNCTIONAL TESTS,

• IDENTIFIED BY SIGNIFICANT EVENT REVIEW TEAM AUXILIARY FEEDWATER HEADER TEST RECIRCULATION MODE TRANSFER TEST CHARGING PUMP LOW HEAD TO HIGH HEAD TEST

• EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMP TEST

• CONTROL ROOM VENTILATION TESTS.

• TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO STARTUP

DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS

• REVIEW OF OPEN DOCUMENTATION DEVIATION REPORTS ENGINEERING WORK REQUESTS ENGINEERING STUDIES DEVIATION REPORTS TECHNICAL REVIEWS COMMITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM ITEMS

• SELECTED REVIEW OF PREVIOUSLY CLOSED DOCUMENTATION

• TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO STARTUP

CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES

• SIGNIFICANT ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO STARTUP

• REMAINING ISSUES TO BE ENTERED INTO CORRECTIVE ACTION SYSTEMS 1

R. W. CALDER MANAGER - NUCLEAR ENGINEERING

INADEQUATE DESIGN/CONFIGURATION CONTROL

• INTAKE CANAL INVENTORY

• EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMPS

• SERVICE WATER HEAT EXCHANGERS

• • .RECIRCULATION SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGERS

• LOW HEAD SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM MOVs

• REACTOR CAVITY SEAL

• IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

• DESIGN ISSUES

• PROGRAMMATIC CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

, INTAKE CANAL INVENTORY ISSUES DESIGN DOES NOT ADEQUATELY ACCOMMODATE LOOP WITH A SINGLE FAILURE ON NON-ACCIDENT UNIT RELIANCE ON NON-SAFETY GRADE EQUIPMENT

- TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS NOT AS RESTRICTIVE AS UFSAR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

- REPOWER CIRCULATING WATER SYSTEM VALVES

- RAISE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CANAL LEVEL

- INSTALL SAFETY GRADE EQUIPMENT

- REVISE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

- INSTALL VACUUM BREAKERS

EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMPS ISSUES

• INADEQUATE PERFORMANCE TESTING

• INADEQUATE CALIBRATION AND PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE

• EFFECTS OF EXTREME TEMPERATURE CONDITIONS

• REMOTE OPERATION AND MONITORING

• *, ESW PUMP ROOM FLOODING

\\

I bdRRECTIVE ACTIONS

.

• REFURBISH PUMPS

• UPGR.ADE BATTERY AND CHARGER, AND ADD ALTERNATOR_

• PERFORM INSTRUMENTED 48 HOUR PUMP OPERABILITY TEST

• PERF9RM SEISMIC,WALKDOWN AND UPGRADE AS NECESSARY

.

• REVISE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 11*:

• VERl~Y PROCEDURES.ADEQUATELY ADDRESS EXTREME

!1,

• 1". TEMPERATURE CONDITIONS

SERVICE WATER.HEAT EXCHANGERS ISSUES

• CORROSION & FOULING

• PERFORMANCE TESTING CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

• INSPECT AND CLEAN

• PERFORM BASELINE TEST (TEMPORARY INSTRUMENTATION)

• MONITOR & IMPLEMENT CLEANING CRITERIA

RECIRCULATION SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGERS ISSUES

• NEW TITANIUM TUBE HEAT EXCHANGERS

• HAVE BEEN WETIED PREVIOUSLY

• DESIGN CALCULATION ASSUMES NO FOULING CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

• .,* CLEAN NORMALLY DRY PORTIONS OF UPSTREAM SERVICE I.

WATER PIPE

• IMPROVE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES AND TRAINING TO MAINTAIN HEAT EXCHANGERS DRY

• RESTORE CIRCULATING WATER DISCHARGE TUNNEL VACUUM PRIMING (LONG TERM) 1 *

• IMPLEMENT SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES FOR LEAKAGE I

DETECTION AND ASSESSMENT

LOW HEAD SAFETY INJECTION MOVs ISSUES LOW HEAD SAFETY INJECTION (LHSI) DISCHARGE VALVES TO HIGH HEAD SAFETY INJECTION (HHSI) SUCTION POWERED FROM WRONG BUS

• ONLY USED DURING RECIRCULATION MODE

• CLOSED DURING INITIAL INJECTION CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

• WALKDOWNS PERFORMED ON OTHER SAFETY RELATED SYSTEMS

• SIGNIFICANT EVENT TEAM FORMED

• OTHER SAFETY RELATED MOVs REVIEWED FOR PROPER CONFIGURATION

• SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE REVIEWED

-. HHSI PUMPS NEEDED FOR SMALL BREAKS FLOW PATH ALWAYS AVAILABLE, EVEN WITH A SINGLE FAILURE

RWST

' *.* *i 1....

j l.CY*

I 2158 MOV-28628 LCV-21~0 LCV-

, ti::C' CONTAINMENT SUMP MOV-RECIRC TO RWST

• 2860A 2-SI-P-lA HOV*

28608 2-SI-P-18 HOV-SI MOY-SI 28638 2863A M MOV-28648 TO RCS COLD LEGS CHARGING/HHS I PUMPS TO RCS HOT LEGS MOV-2270A

REACTOR CAVITY SEAL ISSUES

.

• DESIGN BASIS NOT DOCUMENTED

• NO EVIDENCE OF INITIAL TESTING

• DESIGN BASIS ASSUMPTIONS NOT INCORPORATED IN PROCEDURES

• LACK OF DESIGN CONTROL OF BACK-UP AIR SYSTEM (UNIT 1)

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

• SEAL SYSTEM MODIFIED

- J-SEAL BACKING RING

- SEATING SURFACED WITH NEOPRENE FILLER DIAPHRAGM PLATE STRONG BACK INSTALLED

- NITROGEN SYSTEM BACK-UP UPGRADED

• PROCEDURES UPGRADED

- INSTALLATION/MAINTENANCE

- SURVEILLANCE ABNORMAL (FUEL HANDLING)

- IN SITU DROP TEST

• • J-SEAL LEAKAGE TEST*

IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

• TIMELY

• COMPREHENSIVE

• BROAD SCOPE

• INTEGRATED

• DEMONSTRATE INCREASED MANAGEMENT STANDARDS I !

I !

I :

DESIGN ISSUES DESIGN CONTROL PROGRAM THAT SATISFIES ANSI 45.2-11 REQUIREMENTS

• DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION

• VERIFICATION OF ORIGINAL PLANT DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS

• SURVEILLANCE TESTING

• UPDATE OF PLANT DRAWINGS

• RELIANCE ON NON-SAFETY GRADE EQUIPMENT

I I

I PROGRAMMATIC CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

• STRENGTHEN ONSITE ENGINEERING

- SYSTEM ENGINEERING MATERIAL PROCUREMENT ENGINEERING DESIGN DISCIPLINES

• ESTABLISH CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UFSAR VALIDATION DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION PLANT DESIGN CRITERIA DOCUMENTS

- SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS

TECHNICAL RESOURCE CONSOLIDATION r

VICE PRESIDENT POWER ENGINEERING SERVICES MANAGER NUCLEAR ENGINEERING VICE PRESIDENT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS STATION MANAGER

~-----------------------------------------------+---------------..

SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEERING ASST: STATION MANAGER (NS* L) r-------------...------..... ----..-----------....---------------------------,

SUPERVISOR ADVISORY OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR SYSTEM ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR DESIGN ENGINEERING r

SUPERVISOR CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT I

I I

I I

I I

SUPERVISOR NOE ASST. STATION MANAGER (0

• M)

1

, I

'I I

• 1 I

E. S. GRECHECK ASSISTANT STATION MANAGER NUCLEAR SAFETY & LICENSING - SURRY

FAILURE TO TAKE APPROPRIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION

• REACTOR CAVITY SEAL

• POTENTIAL GAS BINDING OF HIG'H HEAD SAFETY INJECTION PUMPS

• CONTROL ROOM CHILLER CAPACITY

• CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING

• SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL INVENTORY

SUMMARY

OF IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

REACTOR CAVITY SEAL I

EVENT DESCRIPTION

• NO FUEL IN REACTOR VESSEL

• REACTOR CAVITY ISOLATED FROM SPENT FUEL POOL*

• TESTING/MAINTENANCE OF INSTRUMENT AIR VALVES (PLANNED FOR THIS TIME PERIOD)

• LOSS OF AIR TO INFLATABLE SEAL-NITROGEN BACKUP SUPPLY DEPLETES - L,EAKAGE BEGINS

• . LEAKAGE OBSERVED BY OPERATOR IN LOOP ROOM - INSTRUMENT AIR RESTORED-LEAKAGE TERMINATED

. INITIAL EVALUATIONS.

• BELIEVED TO BE RELATIVELY SMALL LEAK OVER LONG PERIOD

• FOCUSED ON POTENTIAL HUMAN ERROR (VALVE MISALIGN.MENT)

• HPES REPORT PREPARED

• SIGNIFICANT EVENT REVIEW PERFORMED

REACTOR CA VITV SEAL (continued)

SUBSEQUENT ACTIONS

• IOER REVIEW ROUTINE FOR ALL HPES REPORTS EVIDENCE OF HIGHER LEAK RATE FOCUS ON POTENTIAL DEFICIENCIES OF J-SEAL CONCERNS PRESENTED TO SNSOC

• PREPARED AND ISSUED 50.72 REPORT TO NRC ON SEPTEMBER 1, 1988

POTENTIAL GAS BINDING OF HHSI PUMPS!:* *

• REVIEWED IEIN 88-23 JULY 1988

• SPECIFIC IEIN CONFIGURATION NOT IDENTIFIED THOUGH OTHER HIGH SPOTS LOCATED

. '.,;*:11:

1*,"

• i I

1 I

• UT TECHNIQUES USED AUGUST 12-AUGUST 23, 1988 TO QUANTIFY GAS SPACES

• EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT MEASURED GAS EXCEEDS PUMP MAXIMUM PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS

• MEMORANDUM CONTAINING EVALUATION PREPARED AUGUST 29, 1988

• . PRESENTED TO SUPERINTENDENT OF TECHNICAL SERVICES SEPTEMBER 16, 1988.

POTENTIAL GAS BINDING OF HHSI PUMPS (continued)*

• UNIT 2 SHUTDOWN FOR REFUELING SEPTEMBER 10, 1988

• UNIT 1 SHUTDOWN SEPTEMBER 14, 1988

• TURNOVER ISSUED TO INSTALL VENTS SEPTEMBER 26, 1988

• MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF SCOPE DETERMINES THAT DEVIATION REPORT SHOULD HAVE BEEN WRITIEN

• DEVIATION REPORT SUBMITTED AND NRC INFORMED ON OCTOBER 12, 1988

• REVIEW AT NORTH ANNA POWER STATION OF SIMILAR SITUATION DETERMINES NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON PUMP OPERABILITY

• VENTS INSTALLED - PROCEDURES IN DEVELOPMENT

CONTROL ROOM CHILLER CAPACITY

• ORIGINAL CHILLERS HAD ONE STAGE BYPASSED DISCOVERED DURING REPLACEMENT-OF FIRST CHILLER NAMEPLATE CAPACITY REDUCED FROM 90 TONS TO 68 TONS DETERMINED TO BE AS ORIGINALLY INSTALLED

- 'DEVIATION REPORT ON DISCOVERY ISSUED NOVEMBER 1987 I

• DEVIATION REPORT EVALUATED BY SNSOC FOR ACCEPTABILITY OF CONTINUED OPERATION BASED ON REDUCED* SERVICE WATER TEMPERATURE

• COMMITMENT FOR REPLACEMENT OF REMAINING TWO CHILLERS ENTERED INTO COMMITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM BY SNSOC

• AT REQUEST OF NRC INSPECTOR, EVALUATION DOCUMENTATION PREPARED APRIL 1988

• ALL CHILLERS FULLY OPERABLE MAY 1988

I CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING

• PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR AIR CONDITIONING UPGRADE BEGUN AUGUST 1986

• UNABLE TO DOCUMENT DESIGN BASIS FOR EXISTING SYSTEM*

• PERFORMED CONSERVATIVE HEAT LOAD CALCULATIONS

• UNABLE TO DEMONSTRATE ANALYTICALLY THAT THE SYSTEM WAS CAPABLE OF MEETING THE HEAT LOAD

• DEVIATION REPORT ISSUED SEPTEMBER 1988

• PREPARED AND ISSUED 50.72 REPORT TO NRC ON NOVEMBER 2, 1988

• INTERIM MODIFICATIONS TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO STARTUP

SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL INVENTORY ::.. :i

• FIVE (5) INCORE DETECTORS PER UNIT (2.5/4.1 mg ENRICHED I

' I U235/DETECTOR)

' !i '

I I

I i

• NRC INSPECTOR IDENTIFIED LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY FOR INCORE DETECTORS ( REPORT 87-10, MAY 1987)

J I

I

I

'.l I

I I

I

• PERIODIC TEST DEV*ELOPED MAY 1987 AND PERFORMED JULY 1987 :

I THAT DID NOT EXPLICITLY REQUIRE IDENTIFICATION OF "STORAGE":

LOCATIONS

• PERIODIC TEST REVISED AUGUST 1987 TO EXPLICITLY DESIGNATE*

I "STORAGE" LOCATIONS BUT NOT COMPLETED FOR OLD DETECTORS

SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL INVENTORY (continued)

• QA AUDIT PERFORMED OCTOBER 1988 DETERMINES INADEQUACIES IN PROGRAM AS IMPLEMENTED - DEVIATION REPORT SUBMITTED....

! I

: I I.

I I

• DETAILED INVENTORY PERFORMED, INCLUDING OPENING RADIOACTIVE WASTE STORAGE DRUMS

• BASELINE INVENTORY ACCOMPLISHED - FIFTY (50) DETECTORS UNACCOUNTED FOR

• INVENTORY PROCEDURES REVISED AND DETAILED STATUS PROVIDED TONRC

SUMMARY

OF IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

• LICENSEE IDENTIFIED

• COMPREHENSIVE

• BROAD SCOPE

.W.R. CARTWRIGHT VICE-PRESIDENT - NUCLEAR OPERATIONS

. M. R. KANSLER STATION MANAGER - SURRY

'i :,

OTHER ISSUES STATUS

• NON-OEM PARTS

• SAFETY RELATED MOV INSPECTION

• RESTART ISSUE STATUS

NON-OEM PARTS

• SCOPE TWO (2) VALVES FIFTY-FOUR (54) PUMPS

• RESULTS THREE (3) PUMPS WITH NON~OEM PARTS

J...

1 I

SAFETY RELATED MOV INSPECTION ENSURE SAFETY RELATED MOVs WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO CHANGE STATE FOR SAFE SHUTDOWN ARE CAPABLE OF PERFORMING THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION

• VERIFY MAINTENANCE HAS BEEN PROPERLY PERFORMED

• VERIFY APPROPRIATE TESTING COMPLETED *

• STATUS

• TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO STARTUP

RESTART ISSUE STATUS

• CANAL INVENTORY

- SUBMIT TECH SPEC

SUMMARY

REPORT

- MODIFICATIONS

• ESW PUMP OPERABILITY

- SUBMIT TECH SPEC

- PERFORMANCE TEST

SUMMARY

REPORT

- MODIFICATIONS

I 02/03/89 i

02/03/89 01/31/89 02/03/89 01/25/89 02/03/89 02/08/89

i RESTART ISSUE STATUS (continued)

• SECONDARY PIPE THINNING

- NDE INSPECTIONS - COMPLETE

SUMMARY

REPORT - ISSUED

- U1 PIPE REPLACEMENT - COMPLETE

- U-2 PIPE REPLACEMENT

• EOG LOAD SEQUENCING

- U1 MODIFICATIONS - COMPLETE

- U2 MODIFICATIONS - COMPLETE

- FINAL

SUMMARY

REPORT

• CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING

SUMMARY

REPORT - ISSUED

- INTERIM MODIFICATIONS 12/30/88 01/19/89 01/20/89 02/04/89 01/25/89 01/25/89 02/01/89 01/06/89 02/05/89

RESTART ISSUE STATUS (continued)

• SOCKET WELD EXAMINATIONS

- EXAMINAT~ONS-COMPLETE LETTER OF COMPLETION - ISSUED

• U2 INS1DE RECIRCULATION SPRAY PUMPS

• - FLOW TESTING

- LETTER OF COMPLETION

- SUBMIT TECH SPEC

• GAS BINDING OF CHARGING PUMPS *

- U1 MODIFICATIONS - COMPLETE

- U2 MODIFICATIONS - COMPLETE

- LETTER OF COMPLETION I.

11/14/88 01/13/89 02/03/89 02/06/89 02/15/89 12/28/88 12/10/88 02/01/89

RESTART ISSUE STATus-(continued)

• OPERATIONAL READINESS ASSURANCE

- U1 SYSTEM WALKDOWNS

- U2 SYSTEM WALKDOWNS

- INITIATE EMERGENCY POWER TEST 01/27/89 02/15/89 01/27/89

W. R. CARTWRIGHT VICE-PRES.IDENT - NUCLEAR OPERATIONS.

• • i. r1', ;* ':**

.i',:.:

• I I

! ii'.

I I* I*

i*IJ

! fi

'I 111 I* ;

,, u i'/ II f/

1 I/

I 1

Ir II 11..

. : 'I i

11'

l. I I!

I i: i

• 1!

l

'. i!

11! '

l !:

1,'

! I k

,111

• 1 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT WORKING GROUP 1

).

MISSION STATEMENT

• REVIEW VIRGINIA POWER DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION (DBD)

PROGRAM PLAN

• PROPOSE PROGRAM TO INCORPORATE DBD INTO STATION ACTIVITIES

• EVALUATE OTHER RELATED COMPANY PROGRAMS FOR CONFLICTS AND REDUNDANCY

• PREPARE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT WORKING GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS

• ESTABLISH A MASTER PLAN FOR DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING A CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

i. :Ii:

I I

• INDOCTRINATE MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL IN THE NEED FOR THE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS i

I I

I L

I

• IDENTIFY ACTIVITIES THAT AFFECT THE CONFIGURATION PROGRAMS:,;

• IDENTIFY CURRENT AND PLANNED PROGRAMS THAT ARE CANDIDATES FOR INTEGRATION WITH DBD DEVELOPMENT

],

I I

I

• ASSIGN RESOURCES AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR DEVELOPING A PLAN TO UPGRADE PROCESSES CONCURRENT WITH DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT

• STANDARDIZE NUCLEAR STATION PROGRAMS

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PURPOSE TO ESTABLISH AN INTEGRATED AND SYSTEMATIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS TO CONTROL THE DESIGN, THE;PHYSICAL PLANT AND THE CRITICAL OPERATIONS OF A FACILITY ~HICH: -

DOCUMENTS AND MAINTAINS THE DESIGN BASIS, INCLUDING RECONSTITUTION WHEN NECESSARY RECONCILES THE FACILITY PHYSICAL CONFIGURATION WITH THE DESIGN BASIS RECONCILES THE FACILITY OPERATING DOCUMENTS WITH THE DESIGN BASIS

• CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

'.PHYSICAL,CONF'i.~lJRAT.ION (.::.:;'*j\\*:

.. :~.L ::/.. ;._: -. :

• t...... *:./*.. *::i.::*:\\ )J};'ifJ~ii~iV*:;, :.~i~t:. <t--.:*/*.. :, *':'._-.:-;. \\'... i

~,......... ~.

II i'I 1111 1

i!i/ i:,:.

11 1 ;1 r11 ifj; :i!

j I

• 1 !I

);I I 'I' iJ'l '!I :

1 1

I!

, I 11; !'1 I.*,

• I I

I*

r ii!

1111,1*1,!1 ***'

q *:

.11 1 t*1 I,

[;,,1'..

,,I ij

• j j I I

,I I

I,

1

.i*.\\

1

. *. PROCESS

. OPERATING DOCUMENTS:.,..

• __ :;\\::~)\\..-: i *..,:. ;_... ;_<;

.,~b*

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ORGANIZATION AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION APPROACH

• PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONCEPT

• LONG TERM PERSPECTIVE

• 'MUL TIDISCIPLINE TEAM CONCEPT

• ABILITY TO CROSS ORGANIZATIONAL BOUNDARIES EFFECTIVELY

• DEDICATED RESOURCES

CONFIGURATION

'i' MANAGEMENT TEAM LEADER I

r

\\ \\*:

ADMINISTRATIVE I!

SUPPORT I

! I!

I I

I I

I I

I PlEX SURRY NORTH ANNA COORDINATOR COORDINATOR COORDINATOR COORDINATOR COORDINATOR PHYSICAL MODEL PHYSICAL M 00DEL -

PROCESSES SYSTEM DESIGN COORDINATOR COORDINATOR MODEL INTEGRATION BASIS DOCUMENTS !

STAFF STAFF

'I

'I

'I COMPUTER ELECTRICAL DOCUMENT (CONTRACT)

(CONTRACT)

OPERATION MODELING CONTROL AND I & C COMf>YTER STAFF MAINTENANCE

- ADMINISTRATION MECHANICAL (VP)

\\..

r r

STAFF CIVIL ENGINEERING (CONTRACT)

\\..

\\..

r HP & CHEMISTRY NUCLEAR

\\..

LICENSING r

STAFF (CONTRACT) i-ADMINISTRATION

.... OTHER FUNCTIONS

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT PLAN

• ESTABLISH STRATEGY PLAN

• MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT & APPROVAL

• ASSIGN RESOURCES

• PREPARE SCOPE, PLAN AND SCHEDULE

• ESTABLISH METHODOLOGY & PROCEDURES

• IDENTIFY AND INVENTORY EXISTING DESIGN BASIS INFORMATION

• ESTABLISH DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS

• IMPLEMENT CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROCESS

• PERFORM INDOCTRINATION AND TRAINING

• INTEGRATE WITH DAILY ACTIVITIES

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM SYSTEM PRIORITIES AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SERVICE WATER CONTAINMENT SPRAY RECIRCULATION SPRAY INSTRUMENT AIR EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM

{-

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM SYSTEM PRIORITIES (continued)

RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEM FEEDWATER AND CONDENSATE REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM COMPONENT COOLING SAFETY INJECTION CHEMICAL AND VOLUME CONTROL MAIN STEAM REMAINING SYSTEMS

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM -

SUMMARY

SCHEDULE -

1988 -- -1995 TYPICAL STATION (NORTH ANNA & SURRY) 1988 1989 _____ ~990 L.--2 991 _ 1-I _19_9_2 ___

1993 _ ~ _ 19~~-+.- 19~5 CM PROGRAM DEVELOP

---"--=--'-==-r--"---'

PROCESS MODEL PHYSICM..

MODEL DESIGN BASIS MODEL DOCUMENT MODEL COMPUTER MODEL 01-13-89 J

- INTEGR(\\TE

• UIPMENT I

SETPOINT v410ATION-=

]

I Pft..OT UFSAR V.AJ...ioATION I I PILOT PLANT DBD I

PILOT 6 DBD'a 9 DBD'a

.15 DBD's 13 DBD'a 13 DBD's 13 DBD'a 11 DBD's llNDEX oocsf@g

~

=i===:1 =-=-=--=--=--=--=-= ~IN~D-E~x-=-=*-o--~..£--= M-O-OC_U_M-ENT...___S ___ __.__ __

---

,1

., SPEC E INSTALL r=--- BUILD CM MODELl, DATABASE & "RUATI~.9-t'.!~~J_p-~_-__

-_-_-.1 l

~ I C

l I

j I

W. R. CARTWRIGHT VICE-PRESIDENT-NUCLEAR OPERATIONS

-