ML18139B601

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Deviation from Insp on 810511-22
ML18139B601
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 07/22/1981
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML18139B595 List:
References
50-280-81-15, 50-281-81-15, NUDOCS 8111050764
Download: ML18139B601 (1)


Text

APPENDIX B NOTICE OF DEVIATION Virginia Electric and Power Company Surry 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 Based on the results of the NRC inspection conducted on May 11-22, 1981, certain activities appear to deviate from your commitments to the Commission as indicated below.

A.

In response to Item I in the Notice of Violation transmitted by Region II letter dated July 3, 1980, VEPCO correspondence dated August 1, 1980, stated that VEPCO would prepare and issue for use, procedures which describe the interface, responsibilities, lines of communications and flow of design information between VEPCO and their architect engineer by October 1, 1980.

B.

Contrary to the above, procedures which describe the interface, responsi-bilities, lines of communications between VEPCO and their architect engineer were not prepared and issued for use until February 1, 1981.

In response to Item B in the Notice of Violation transmitted by Region II letter dated July 3, 1980, VEPCO correspondence dated August 1, 1980, listed the following corrective step to avoid further violations: A change to the Nuclear Power Station Quality Assurance Manual (NPSQAM) has been initiated to require distribution of audit responses and other pertinent documentation to the recipients of the audit report; and that the date when full compli-ance will be achieved for this item is January 1, 1981.

Contrary to the above, the NPSQAM change was not approved until March 5, 1981.

C.

In the 1 i censee response, dated December 10, 1980, to NUREG-0737, VEPCO committed the shift technical advisors (STAs) to successfully complete college level training in a variety of areas.

Contrary to the above, one of the STAs assigned to the Surry Station did not attend any of the fundamentals courses.

A letter dated August 13, 1980, from the professor who taught the courses for VEPCO stated that none of the STAs took the test on fluid mechanics and heat transfer. The professor* s letter also stated that attendance was down for many courses because of plant need for the individuals in the program.

  • 1' 8111050764 811019 PDR ADOCK 05000280 G

PDR

\\