ML18136A361

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER 79-038/03L-0:on 791214,two Manual Isolation Valves for Refueling Water Storage Tank Chemical Addition Tank Outlet Valve MOV-CS-102B Found Closed.Caused by Operator Procedural Error.Operators Instructed
ML18136A361
Person / Time
Site: Surry Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 01/04/1980
From: Stewart W
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML18136A360 List:
References
LER-79-038-03L-01, LER-79-38-3L-1, NUDOCS 8001070450
Download: ML18136A361 (2)


Text

. NRC FORM-366 - - - - - - - - ~ -- U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (7a7.J. __ , ,.

. .CENSEE EVENT REPORT CONTROL BLOCK: I I IG) (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION) 1 6

~

7 8 I9 v1 Al s1 Pl s1 1101 °I O I - I o I oI oI o I o I - Io I o 1014 11 11 11 I 1 101 I 10 14 15 LICENSE NUMBER 25 26 LICENSE TYPE 30 57 CAT 58 LICENSEE CODE CON'T

[ITIJ 7 8

~~~~~ ~©I 01 5 1°I O I O 12 1 8 I 0101 11 21 t*1 60 61 DOCKET NUMBER 68 69 EVENT DATE 41 71 9IG)I 74 75 01 11 01 41 sl olG)

REPORT DATE 80 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES@

I With Unit 1 at steady state operation, two nnnual isolation valves for the RWST

~ I Chanical Addition Tank (CAT) outlet valve IVX)~-102B were fourrl to be closed.

((:ill Subsequent to the discovery of this con::lition, a test established the operability

((TI] I of the redurrlant CAT outlet valve, therefore the health am safety of the general

((II] I public were not affected. The event is reportable in accordance with Technical I

(([TI I Specification 6. 6.~-~ b. 3. I~

[§))]

7 8 9 80 SYSTEM CAUSE CAUSE COMP. VALVE CODE CODE SUBCODE COMPONENT CODE SUBCODE SUBCODE

[ill] I sl 1@ ~@ L!J@ I z I z I z I z I z I z 18 L?J l!J@

8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 18 19 20 SEQUENTIAL OCCURRENCE REPORT REVISION

@ LER/RO CVENT YEAR REPORT NO: CODE TYPE NO.

REPORT NUMBER I 7 J 9 J l.=.l l O I 3 1* 8 1 J/1 I28O I 3 29I l£J. l=J ~

21 22 23 24 26 27 30 31 32 ACTION FUTURE EFFECT SHUTDOWN r'22) ATTACHMENT NPAD-4 PRIME C.OMP. COMPONENT TAK.ff: ACTl2N ON PLANT METHOD . HOURS ~ SUBMITTED FOAM SUB. SUPPLI EA MANUFACTURER

~@L_j@

33 34 L.:J@ L:J I O I OI O I I 35 36 37 40

~@

41

~@

42 LI@

43 I z 19 19 19 I CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 44 47

[I12] I The discrepancy in valve al igrment was caused by an operator failirg to follow a ITTIJ I procedure that required the reopeni.rg of manual isolation valves for IDV-CS-102B OJI] I followi~ canpletion of a test. Operators have been explicitly reinstructed on um I the importance of perfonni.rg a periodic test in canplete conformance with the

[I]3J I test document.

7 8 9 80 A

OTHERSTATUS @

FACILITY METHOD OF STATUS  % POWER DISCOVERY DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION ~

ITE] LI@ I 11 o, 01@11-N-JA_______. ~@L..I_s_e_n_i_o_r_Re_a_c_t_o_r_Ope-=-_r_a_t_o_r_Ob_se_rv_a_t_i_o_n_ _.

7 8 9 10 12 11 44 45 46 80 ACTIVITY CONTENT ~

REL~SED OF RELEASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY~ LOCATION OF RELEASE@

[QI] L:J@) ~@ I...._NA _ _ _ _ _ _*........ NA 7 8 9 10 11 44 45 80 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES r:;;:;,.

NUl;l.BEA. ~ TYPE DESCRIPTION~

@TI 7 8 I o I u I oJl:J@L----~---------------------,-----'

9 11 12 13 BO PERSONNEL INJURIES ~

ONU~BEA . DESCRIPTION 41 Ci:fil I I I O 1@1,._._________________________~

7 8 9 11 12 80 LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO FACILITY '4J'I TZE DESCAIP~ON ~

~

7 8 9

~(s)L--_N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10 80 PUBLICITY Q <Jr-, NRC USE ONLY IS~EDQ DESC:&\_TION ~ 8 0 Q l O7 0 7 ..J O "'

[ill]

7 8 9

~ei10l.....- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : '68 69II I I I II I II II 80*0: I~

0 NAME OF PREPARER __..w._.*..__.T...., .__.S.LJt_,,ew"""-"i:i'-'r....t.___ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ PHONE =---+(~s~o"*-4)"3"'3~7==3~1i,,:gj,,l,l4,--__

Q.

  • ~~~ATTaCHMENT: Page 1

- -,- - ~ ""'J St1rry Power Station

... Docket No.:

Report No.:

Event Date:

Title of Event:

50-280 79-038/03L 12/14/79

  • MOV-CS-l02B INOPERABLE DUE TO CLOSED MANUAL VALVES l-C.S-39 / 43
1. Description of Event:

With Unit 1 at steady state operation, two manual isolation valves l-CS-39/43 for the RWST Chemical Addition Tank (CAT) outlet valve MOV-CS-102B were found to be closed during a plant walk-down by a Senior Reactor Operator. The manual isolation valves had been closed for 38 hours4.398148e-4 days <br />0.0106 hours <br />6.283069e-5 weeks <br />1.4459e-5 months <br />.

The event is reportable in accordance with Technical Specification

  • 6.6.2.b.3.
2. Probable Consequences/Status of Redundant Systems:

With MOV-CS-102B isolated, if the redundant parallel CAT outlet valve had failed to open upon the initiation of a CLS Hi Hi signal, sodium hydroxide could not have been added to the containment spray water in the correct proportion as water was pumped out of the *RWST by the con~

tainment spray pumps. Subsequent to the discovery of the closed manual valves l-CS-39/43, a test established the operability of the redundant CAT outlet valve, therefore the health and safety of the public were*

not affected. *

3. Cause:

The discrepancy in valve alignment was caused by an operator failing to follow a procedure that required the reopening of manual isolation valves for MOV-CS-102B following the completion of a test.

4. Immediate Corrective Action:

Upon the discove~y of the discrepancy in the manual isolation valves alignment, a performance test was conducted to prove the operability of the redundant CAT outlet valve had a CLS Hi Hi signal been initiated while MOV-CS-102B was isolated. In conformance with the performance test, MOV-CS-102B was then unisolated.

5. Scheduled Corrective Action:

Corrective action was taken upon the discovery of the event by conducting the performance test. This test proved the operability of the redundant CAT outlet valve and unisolated MOV-CS-102B, therefore no scheduled corrective action is required.

6. Action Taken to Prevent Recurrence:

To prevent recurrence of the event, operators have been explicitly re-instructed on the importance of performing periodic tests in complete conformance with the test document.

7. Generic Implications:

Since this event was caused by a single case of operator error in the performance of a test, there are no generic implications associated with this event.