05000280/LER-1979-014-03, /03L-0 on 790422:liquid Waste Disposal Radiation Monitor Failed to Give High Alarm & Trip Release Valve. Caused by Instrument Drift in High Alarm Setpoint.All Liquid Waste Releases Were Secured & Alarm Board Checked

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML18114A601)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
/03L-0 on 790422:liquid Waste Disposal Radiation Monitor Failed to Give High Alarm & Trip Release Valve. Caused by Instrument Drift in High Alarm Setpoint.All Liquid Waste Releases Were Secured & Alarm Board Checked
ML18114A601
Person / Time
Site: Surry 
Issue date: 05/22/1979
From: Stewart W
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML18114A599 List:
References
LER-79-014-03L-01, LER-79-14-3L-1, NUDOCS 7905250150
Download: ML18114A601 (2)


LER-1979-014, /03L-0 on 790422:liquid Waste Disposal Radiation Monitor Failed to Give High Alarm & Trip Release Valve. Caused by Instrument Drift in High Alarm Setpoint.All Liquid Waste Releases Were Secured & Alarm Board Checked
Event date:
Report date:
2801979014R03 - NRC Website

text

___

~i;!C FOR~ :;s;;;

~"J... Ti"?

e UCENScE EVENT RE?ORTe c:::~ri"::lOL :It.CC:<:

..__I _....____._~---------'l (0 I

lPL=ASE PRINT OR TY?~,:l,L.L f!EQ.UIRED INi:aQAMATICNJ l VI A! SI P I SI l lG)I 0

?....!CS'l5C.:: C.:JOC.

i..&.

s 0 - I o I o I o I o I o J - I o l o lG)I 4 J 1 I 1 l 1 !1

!...!C2NS2 NU;>.1Si:.:l 25

~

L,CS'iSG; TYP'=.

! J I

~~~~ ~G) 1 o I s I o I o I o l 2 I s I o lG I o I 4 I 2 I 2 17 I* 9 l@ I o l s I 2 I 2 l 7 l 9 I G)

SU 01 iJCC:<:T."~UMa=::=t

'33 63

'::VENT CAT::

I~

i:,

RE?.':!..,.q_T :L,l,.T=

30

'/:::'IT iJE.SC::ll?T!Oi'J,:l,NO PROBA8LS c::::NSECUE:NC::s@

I '.J, : ; I The Liquid Waste Disposal Radiation monitor failed to give a high _alam and trio

~ S ; 3 I the release valve. This is contrary to Technical. Specification 3. 7.E. Table 3. 7-5, and is reportable as per Technical Specification 6.6.2.b.(4). 'Th~ release did not excee allowable limits specified in 10CFR20. Therefore, the health and safety of the IJ, 5 I ! public were not affected.

~-

~

7 a ;i V) iiJ 0

SYST"'-M cco..:

1n1c I@

3 10

~

L::l/RO L;;'JENTi'EAR

~

i!':?Of!T I 7 I 9 I

!'lW..IBEi1' 21 ll c.:.uss:.

c.::i.usi:

COMP.

COOi:

stJBCCOl:

COMPONENT COOS SUSCOOS.

~@ ~@ I I I NI s l T I RI u !@_. J~L 11 12 lJ IS SEQUi:."'ITlAL.

OCOJA A&ICE AEi'ORT No.

coca l t 10 11 14 !

1.,t p 13

~

m n

~

19 A~

TYPS:

l_!;:_l_

,:,.CTION RITU,H:

EFF':CT" SHUTOOV.N

(.'.;:;\\

.ATi;l.CHMl::i'ff:

a
o,j?!'!Q-1.

RJl'IMSUS.

r!EV1S1C:'ol NO.

~

32

~PON6'1T

.la..:.MUFACn!flER i!O

,).XE?!

,,CTION ON PUNT METrlOO HOUf!S 'c)

SUBMITT'SiJ

~ l@LHJ@ l; l@

Lzl@ Jiol oj 01 oj LYI@.* LI(§ 42 iv 11 11 Is. I@

C:,.1.:SE OE.SCnl?TION ANO CC:RRECi1VE ACTIONS @

47 I'-Th_e __

f_a_i_l_u_r_e __

o_f_t_h_e_r_a_d_i_a_t_i_o_n_m_o_n_i_t_o_r_a_l_a_rm s_i_g __ n_a_l_w_a......,s_. _c_a_u_s_e_d_._b_y_i_n_s_t_r_um_e_n_t_d_r_i_* _f_t_i_n _ __,f liLJ jthe high alarm setpoint. At no time were the limits of 10CFR20,'Appendix B 7 or.Te_£hni-J.

[I'TTlfcal Specification-3.11.A.l exceeded. All liquid wa*ste release~ were secured. The alarmt

!.llil !board was calibrated and checked. The monitor was* returned to service*~

11.1.:. i.

.J,* ------------_.;._,_

3.

3

ol.Qur,*

13[)1 MET!-100 OF*

' i Si"..:. TtlS

~ P':JW1:."I'*

on-ts:t STATtlS.. l.::::::J 01:SCOVE.r!Y

1 1

.:. [!JI]. ~@) ! 0 I O I O j@l Unit 2 Defueled I W@I OIS:OVERY OSC211"TfON * @

Operator observation

_J _

1 3

3 10 12 n

44-45 4.5-.

i

.>,C;"l'JI,..,.-

c:J~"IT C\\

\\

.'!ET =.:i.si:O OF ;:ie1...=AS.:

,U,1CUNTOJ:Acr1v1TY rrm LLl@ ~@1..... ___

NA_* ____ __

7 3

3 l:J 11 NA SQ 80

?~ONNE'_.:X?CSl.ii'I E5:

Q.

I ~ I 7 I.10 ~,aaro r@17!@1..c....

_-..:~..:~.:.l"Tl_O_N_1.:::::J_

39 ___________________________ ~

1 3

3 11 1'2 i:l ao

?'.:FISONNEL INJUl'UcS' (41)

\\

[2LJ I aT3dBT o i@'-OES_=_*_PTI_c..,,._~_4i_,A ____________________ ~_..;.....,,_ ______

~--i.

7 3

g 11 12

\\

LOSS Cr IJl'I IJAMAGc: TO.f'ACU1"Y ~

T'"r?!:

O!:.SCrllFTTCN

\\::::)

EE~@

NA

\\ \\

."'J!ll..lC"N Q\\

1 30

\\

. oO NRC USc.GNLY ---*

7 3

9 10

\\

ISSlJED OE3C'lr~C.'I ~

7905~ 5 0/56 (ill] ~E).... I _____

N_A ______

-.1

. [::i I II I I I I I I I_J i 7

3 g

10 sa 63 ao "'*

W. L.

  • Stewart N.AME OF ?RE?A~ER _____ _;. __________,_ __

(804) 357-3184.

PHC~lE:--------------

0 Cl. ~-

r--:J I

I (Attachment, page 1 of A Surry Power STation, Un'W' 1 Docket No: 50-280 Report No: 79-014/03L-0 Event Date:

4-22-79 Title:

Radiation Honitor ~f-LW-108 Half unction

1.

Description of Event

The Liquid Waste Disposal Radiation monitor RM-LW-108 failed to give a high

.alarm signal to trip the effluent discharge valve FCV-LW-104A and terminate a liquid release.

This event is contrary to Technical Specification Table *3_7~5 (Alarm Setpoint). It is reportable as per Technical Specification 6.6.2.B.4.

2.

Probable Consequences and Status of Redundant Systems:

The release limits delineated in Technical Specification*3.ll.A (10CFR20 App. B) were not exceeded.

Therefore, the health and safety of the public were not affected.

The redundant discharge tunnel monitor was operable and verified no significant release occurred.

3.

Cause

The failure of the radiation monitor alarm* signal,;,ras caused by instrument drift in the high alarm setpoint.

At no time were the limits of 10CFR.20, Appendix B, or Technical.Specification 3.11.A.l exceeded.

4.

Immediate Corrective Action

All liquid waste releases were secured.

The alarm board was calibrated and checked.

The monitor was returned.to service.

5.

Subsequent Corrective Action:

None considered necessary.

6.

Actions Taken to Prevent Recurrence:

No further corrective action is required.

7.

Generic Implications None