05000220/LER-1980-027-03, /03L-0:on 801126,operability Tests Were Not Immediately Performed as Required.Caused by Misunderstanding of Intent of Procedure.Testing Performed

/03L-0:on 801126,operability Tests Were Not Immediately Performed as Required.Caused by Misunderstanding of Intent of Procedure.Testing Performed

ML18037A312
Person / Time
Site:	Nine Mile Point
Issue date:	12/26/1980
From:	Harrison P NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML17053C192	List: 05000220/LER-1980-027, Forwards LER 80-027/03L-0 05000220/LER-1980-027-03, /03L-0:on 801126,operability Tests Were Not Immediately Performed as Required.Caused by Misunderstanding of Intent of Procedure.Testing Performed ML17053C191 ML18037A312
References
LER-80-027-03L, LER-80-27-3L, NUDOCS 8101060546
Download: ML18037A312 (2)

LER-1980-027, /03L-0:on 801126,operability Tests Were Not Immediately Performed as Required.Caused by Misunderstanding of Intent of Procedure.Testing Performed

Event date:
Report date:
2201980027R03 - NRC Website

text

NRC FORM 366 U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LlCENSEE EVENT REPORT 4* CONTROL BLOCK:

1 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALLREQUIRED INFORMATION) 1 6

~ol N

Y N

M P l Q20 0

0 0

0 0

0

0 0 Q34 l

Q4~

Qs 7

8 9

LICENSEE CODE 14 15 ~

LICENSE NUMBER 25 26 LICENSE TYPE 30 57 CAT 58 CON'T z

Qs DOCKET NUMBER 68 69 EVENT DATE'4 75 REPORT DATE 80 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABI.E CONSEQUENCES 10

~o 2

During normal operation, followin maintenance of Control Rod Drive 3

Scram Pilot Solenoids, operability-tests were not immediatel erformed 4

as required by procedure

~ The re uired.testin was intended to demon-

~os strate scram pilot valve operability'o ultimatel ensure the CRD scram insertion times as re uired b Technxcal S ecifications.

No conditions adverse to safety or the environment were involved.

~OB 80 7

8 9

~Os 7

8 47 SYSTEM

CAUSE

CAUSE COMP.

VALVE CODE CODE SUBCODE COMPONENT. CODE SUBCODE SUBCODE

~O ~Q ~O

~

~

~

~

~

~ Q ~Q ~n 9

10 11 12 13 18 19 20

~

SEQUENTIAL OCCURRENCE REPORT REVISION LER/RO EVENT YEAR REPORT NO.

CODE TYPE NO.

Ql astollt ~80

~

~DZ 7

~~

~oz

~b

~

~0

'1 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 iACTION. FUTURE EFFECT SHUTDOWN ATTACHMENT NPRDQ PRIME COMP.

COMPONENT TAKEN ACTION ON PLANT METHOD HOURS O22 SUBMITTED FORM SUB.

SUPPLIER MANUFACTURER

~AQla ~DQ19

~ZQ29

~ZQal 0

0 0

0 N

Q23

~YQ24

~NQ29 33 34

'5 36 37 40 41 42 43 44 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 27 o

Technicians misunderstood the rocedure ste intent. of how o era Q2.

testing was to be erformed.

U on discover from su erv'perability testing was erformed as ori inall intended.

Further acti 7

8 9

FACILITY STATUS

'Yi POWER OTHER STATUS Q

~l5 0

Q29 ~~~

Z Q29

'N/A 7

8 9

10 12 13 44 ACTIVITY CONTENT RELEASED OF RELEASE

'MOUNTOF ACTIVITY z

Q33 Lzg(Q N A 7

8 9

10 11 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES NUMBER TYPE

'ESCRIPTION A3 2 ~00 0 Q3~ZQ39 N/A 7

8 9

11 12 13 PERSONNEL INJURIES NUMBER DESCRIPTION 41 s

~00 0

Qao N/A 80 METHOD OF DISCOVERY DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION Q32

~B Q31 Su ervisor Review 45 46 80 LOCATION OF RELEASE 80 44:

45 80 80 7

9 11 12 LOSS OF OR DAMAGETO FACILITYQ43 TYPE

DESCRIPTION

Z Q42 N/A 9

10 PUBLICITY ISSUED DESCRIPTION~

LNJQ44

'N A 9

10 NAME OF PREPARER 80 7

8 NRC USE ONLY s~o~ oeo Spy o

9 68 69 80 o PHQNE (315 343-21 10 Ext.

12 2L 7

8 P. Harrison 3

entails a procedure chan e to more recisel describe the ro er test 4

requirements.

4j