ML18017B130
| ML18017B130 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 06/05/1980 |
| From: | Herdt A, Kleinsorge W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18017B127 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-80-13, 50-401-80-11, 50-402-80-11, 50-403-80-11, NUDOCS 8007100313 | |
| Download: ML18017B130 (13) | |
See also: IR 05000400/1980013
Text
~llRED~
~4
PO
CpQ, g
+rg
gO
++*++
UNITEDSTATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMlSS!ON
REGION II
101 MARIETTAST., N.W., SUITE 3100
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303
JUN -5 1980
Report Nos. 50-400/80-13,
50-401/80-11,
50-402/80-11
and 50-493/80-11
Licensee:
Carolina Power 8 light Company
411 Fayetteville Street
Raleigh,
NC
27602
Facility Name:
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
Docket Nos. 50-400, 50-401,
50-402 and 50-403
License Nos.
CPPR-158,
CPPR-159,
CPPR-160
and CPPR-161
Inspection
a
H
'
Raleigh, North Carolina
Inspector:
Approved b
n o
e dt, Section Chief,
RCES Branch
Date
igned
ss
~~
ate
igned
SUHMARY
Inspection
on May .13-16,
1980
Areas Inspected
This routine,
unannounced
inspection involved 30 inspector-hours
on site in the
areas of steel structures
and supports, safety-related piping and Reactor Coolant
Pressure
Boundary Piping.
Results
Of the three areas inspected,
no items of noncompliance or deviations were identi-
fied in two areas;
one item of noncompliance
was found in one area (Infraction-
Melding in the way of Rust - Paragraph 6b(1)(a)).
~e
- )
'g4r
r
SQ Q 7100 8ls
DETAILS
Persons
Contacted
- Licensee
Employees
+R.
M. Parsons,
Site Manager
+A. M. Lucas, Senior Resident Engineer
- G. L. Forehand,
Principal
QA Specialist
+V. M. Safarian,
Senior
QA Specialist - Welding
- F. A. Shaikh, Project Engineer Welding
W. H. Wyllie, Senior Construction Manager - CP&L
+M. F. Thompson, Jr., Director C&S - CP&L
Other licensee
employees
contacted
included eight construction craftsmen,
and
four QA technicians.
Other Organizations
'
2.
+F. P. Hazelip, Welding & QA Superintendent,
(CB&I)
+J. Edgar,
+D. Goodman, Project Manager, Daniel Construction
Company
(DCC)
+Attended exit interview
Exit Interview
The inspection
scope
and findings
were
summarized
on May 16,
1980 with
those
persons
indicated in Paragraph
1 above.
The item of noncompliance
described in paragraph 6b(1)(a), the inspector follow-up items described in
paragraph 6b(2)(a)
and 6b(4)(a)
and the unresolved
item described in para-
graph 7b(5)(b)
were discussed.
No dissenting
comments
were received
from
the licensee.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings
Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items
Unresolved
items are matters
about which more information is required to
determine
whether
they are
acceptable
or
may involve noncompliance
or
deviations.
New unresolved
items identified during this inspection
are
discussed in paragraph 7b(5)(b).
5.
Independent Inspection Effort (Units 1, 2, 3 and 4)
The inspector conducted
a general inspection of the power block construction
site,
the pipe fabrication shop, all CB&I and
CP&L welding material issue
stations,
the pipe storage
area
and the containment
dome fabrication area
-2-
to observe construction progress
and construction activities such as welding,
nondestructive
examination, material handling and control, housekeeping
and
storage.
H%
.-. Within the areas
examined,
no items of noncompliance
or devigtions
were
identified.
I
6.
Steel Structures
and Supports (Unit 1)
The inspector
observed
non welding and welding work activities for steel
structures
within the containment
as
described
below to determine
whether
applicable
code
and procedure
requirements
were being met.
The applicable
code for containment fabrication is the
ASME B and
PV Code Section III
Division 2 1975 edition with addenda through winter 76.
a.
Observation of Non Welding Activities
Observation of specific work activities were
conducted
to determine
conformance,
where applicable,
with the following; inspection and/or
work procedures,
record keeping requirements,
installation specifica-
tion
requirements,
specified
materials
and
qualified inspection
personnel.
~Activit
Storage
Magnetic
Particle
Examination
Storage
Structure
Containment Plates
Polar Crain Support
178-97I
Containment Penetrations
Procedure
(CP&L) PGD-001,
Rev.
12
1
(CP&L) PGD-001 Rev.
12
b.
Observation of Welding Activities
The inspector
observed
in-process
welding activities of containment
structural field welds as described
below to determine whether applic-
able code and procedure requirements
were being met.
(1)
Welding
The following welds
were
examined in process
to determine
work
conducted in accordance with traveler, welding procedures available;
welding technique
and sequence;
weld geometry, fit-up electrical
characteristics;
equipment condition:
Structure
Location or Identification
Containment
Containment
Polar Crane
Support
Containment
Spray
Piping Restraint
Containment
Spray
Piping Restraint
Cl course to 17th ring increment
W to V
Cl course to 17th ring inc~ent
T to
S
178-49
R
CT"H-117
CT"H-35
(a)
With regard
to the
above
inspection,
the inspector,
on
May 15,
1980,
noted that tack welds attaching
the
base
plate,
of containment
spray piping restraint
CT-H-117, to
the respective
containment
pad,
were desposited
over heavy
rust.
Further, the inspector noted that no attempt had been
made to
remove
the rust.
The
above is contrary to the
requirements
of the
ASME B and
PV Code Section IIIDivision
2 paragraph
CC-4541.2,
which states
in part,
"The surfaces
for welding shall be free of scale, rust---."
Failure to
fabricate structures
in accordance
with the applicable
code
is in noncompliance with 10 CFR 50.55a.
This is an infraction and was assigned
item No. 400/80-13-01
"Welding in the way of rust".
(2)
Weld Heat Treatment
The inspector reviewed the CBGI, and
CPGL programs for weld heat
treatment for compliance with QA procedure
and
Code requirements.
The welds listed in paragraph
6b(l) and
7b (1) were examined in
process relative to weld joint preheating to determine; procedures
available;
procedures
specify
acceptable
preheating
method;
procedures
provide
monitoring
and
recording
requirements
and
procedure compliance.
(a)
With respect
to the
above inspection the inspector
noted
that the COL procedure
MP-04 Revision 2 "Procedure for Heat
Treatment"
permits interrupted preheating
without material
restriction.
Regulatory
Guide
1.50 requires
uninterrupted
preheating
from the start of welding to the completion of
post-weld
heat
treatment for low alloy steel
production
The inspector
determined that, to the date of this
inspection,
the licensee
had not made any low alloy produc-
tion welds.
The inspector
discussed
the above procedural
inadequacy with'the licensee.
The licensee stated that they
would revise MP-04 to reflect the requirement of Regulatory
Guide 1.50.'.-The inspector stated that the above would be an
inspector
follow-up item
and identified
as
400/80-13-02,
401, 402, 403/80-11-02:
"Interrupted Preheating".
(3)
Welder Qualification
The inspector reviewed the CPSL and CBRI programs forgualification
of welders
and welding operators for compliance with l}Aprocedures
and ASME Code requirements.
(1)
The following welder qualification status records
and "Records
of Performance Qualification Test" were reviewed relative to
the weld joints listed in Paragraph
6b(1) and 7b(l).
DLB
CBGI
Steel structure
6
supports
CBSI
CBGI
Steel structures
8
supports
Steel structure
6
supports
CBRI
Steel structures
6
supports
CDB
CBSI
Steel structures
6
supports
B69
DCC
Safety-related
piping
BSO
B87(repair)
1
DCC
DCC
Safety-related
piping
Safety<<related
piping
(4)
The inspector reviewed the'Exl and
CPRL programs for control of
welding materials
to determine
whether materials
are being pur-
chased,
accepted,
stored
and handled in accordance
with QA proce-
dures
and applicable
code requirements.
The following specific
areas
were examined:
Purchasing
procedures
Receiving,
storing, distributing and
handling
procedures~ Material identification> Inspection of
welding material issuing stations
Welding material
purchasing
and receiving records for the
following materials
were
reviewed for conformance
with
applicable procedures
and code requirements:
-5-
Process+
~e
Size
Heat No.
Or anization
SMAW
SMAW
SAW
SAW
SMAW
7018
3/16"
7018
5/32"
7018
1/8"
7018
1/8"
F72
Flux
EM12K
3/32"
7018
3/32"
7018
1/8"
7018
1/8"
70S6
1/8"
WWW-018
PPP-033
PPP-046
WWW-004
3077
081171
421C8671
421C9521
421J9781
661C107
C961
CB$1
CBQI
CBRI
CBRI
CBRI
CPS'PGL
+SMAW
-
Shielded Metal Arc Welding
SAW
-
Submerged
Arc Welding
-
Gas Tungsten Arc Welding
(a)
With regard
to the
above inspection,
the inspector
noted
that the
CPM, procedure
MP-03 Revision 8,
Welding Material
Control" specifies
that
submerged
arc welding flux, after
opening, shall be stored at 150 degrees
F to 300 degrees
F.
AWS Structural Welding Code D1.1 requires
one of the following
actions for submerged
arc welding flux after open storage
and prior to use:
1) To discard the top one inch of flux or
2) To recondition the flux at 250 degrees
F for one hour.
The
inspector determined that, to the date of this inspection, the
licensee
had not stored
any submerged
arc welding flux.
The
inspector discussed
the above procedural
inadequacy with the
licensee.
The licensee
stated that they would revise HP-03
to reflect
the
requirements
of
AWS Dl.l.
The inspector
stated
that, the above
would be
an inspector follow-up item
and identified as 400/80-13-03,
401, 402, 403/80"11-03 "Flux
Storage".
(5)
Welding Procedure Specification
The inspector
reviewed the
CBRI program for preparation,
quali-
fication, approval/certification,
distribution,
and revision of
Welding Procedure
Specifications
(WPS)
compliance
with the
procedures
and the ASME code requirements.
(1)
The inspector reviewed the below listed WPS and the supporting
Procedure
Qualification Record
(PQR) to determine
whether
essential,
supplementary and/or nonessential variables inclu-
.ding thermal treatment were consistent with code requirements;
whether WPSs were properly qualified and their supporting
were accurate
and retrievable; whether all required mechanical
tests
had
been
performed
and the results met the minimum
requirements;
whether the PQRs had been reviewed and certified
by appropriate
personnel
and,
whether
any revisions and/or
changes to nonessential variables were noted.
-6-
Process
7018(A)
Shielded Metal Arc Welding
7018(B)
Rev 4 Shielded Metal Arc Welding.
8
No items of noncompliance or deviations except as described in paragraph
6b(1)(a) vere identified.
7.
Safety-Related Piping (Units 1, 2, 3 6 4)
The inspector
observed
non-welding and welding work activities for safety-
related piping as described
below to determine whether applicable
code
and
procedure
requirements
were being met.
The applicable
code for safety-
related piping is the
1974 edition with addenda
through
winter 1976.
a
~
Observation of Non Welding Activities
Observation of specific work activities were
conducted
to determine
conformance,
where applicable,
with the following; inspection and/or
work procedures,
record keeping, installation specifications or plans,
specified materials,
specified
NDE, calibration and use of proper test
equipment and qualified inspection and NDE personnel.
A~ctivit
Storage
System or
Camaonent
Injection
Tank
Unit
1-4
Procedure
PGD-002 Rev.
10
Storage
Piping
Assemblies
1-4
PGD-001 Rev.
12
Radiographic
Inspection
1-MS-177-FM-282
NDEP 101 Rev.
2
b.
Observation of Welding Activities
The inspector observed in-process
welding activities of safety-related
piping field welds as described
below to determine whether applicable
code and procedure requirments were being met.
~e'+'
e
e
e
t
~
~
'
4V4
t>>
~
(1)
Welding
The below listed welds were examined in process to determine work
conducted in accordance
with traveler; welder identification and
location; welding procedure;
WPS assignment
welding technique
and
sequence;
materials identify; weld geometry; fit-up; .temporary
attachments;
gas
purging; preheat;
electrical characteristics;
shielding gas;,welding equipment condition; interpass temperature;
interpass
cleaning; process
control systems; identity of welders;
qualification of inspection personae);
and wefd history records.
I
7
Joint No.
SW"9-FW-115
SW-9"FW-114
MS-65-FW-282
Unit
Size
30"X.0375"
4
30"x0.375"
1
32"x1.052
Stage of
Fabrication
Fitup
Welding out
Repair
Welding
System
Serve.ce
water
(2)
Weld Heat Treatment
Veld heat treatment is discussed in paragraph 6b(2).
(3)
Welder Qualification
Welder qualification is discussed in paragraph 6b(3).
(4)
Welding Material Control
Welding material control is discussed in paragraph 6b(4).
(5)
Welding Procedure Specification
The inspector reviewed the
CPSL program for preparation, qualifi-
cation,
approval/certification,
distribution,
and
revision of
welding procedures
Specifications
(WPS)
compliance with the
procedures
and the ASME code requirements.
(a)
The inspector reviewed the below listed WPS and the supporting
Procedure Qualification Record
(PQR) to determine whether essen-
tial, supplementary
and/or nonessential
variables including
thermal
treatment
were consistent with code requirements;
whether
WPSs
were properly qualified and their supporting
were accurate
and retrievable;
whether all required
mechanical tests
had been performed
and the results
met the
minimum requirements;
whether the
PQRs had been reviewed and
certified by appropriate personnel and, whether any revisions
and/or changes to nonessential variables were noted.
Process
or Title
1 BA8 Rev.,C
MP-06 Rev.
7
.-'Gas Tungsten Arc 8 Sgielded Metal
Arc Welding
e
"General Welding Procedure for Carbon
Steel Weldments" <'"-'"
(b)
With regard to the
above inspection,
the inspector noted
that paragraph 4.5.7 of COL Procedure
HP-06 permits peening
on the final weld layer for welds that are to be post weld
heat treated.
The inspector
stated
that the 'peening of
0
final weld layers could invalidate final, surface inspection
of
a weld.
The licensee
indicated
that
they- would look
further into the matter.
The inspector
stated
that
the
above
would be
an unresolved
item and identified as
400/
80-13-04, 401, 402, 403/80-11-04:
"Final Weld Peening".
In the areas
inspected,
no items of noncompliance
or deviations
were noted.
8.
Reactor
Coolant Pressure
Boundary Piping - Observation of Work and
Work
Activities (Units
1 and 2)
The inspector
observed
non-welding
work activities for reactor
coolant
pressure
boundary
(RCPB) piping.
The applicable
code for installation of
RCPB piping is given in paragraph 7.
a
~
Observation of specific work activities were
conducted
to determine
conformance,
where applicable,
with the following; inspection and/or
work procedures,
record keeping requirements, installation specification
requirements,
specified material and qualified inspection personnel.
Activity
Storage
Component
Procedure
PGD-002 Rev.
10
Within the areas
examined, there were no items of noncompliance or deviations
identified.
~
~
P