ML17352A792

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Requests That Util Revise Response to NRC Re GL 92-08, Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barriers Since Portions of Util Response Deferred or Specified Use of Performance Based Approach Which Requires Updating
ML17352A792
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/19/1994
From: Zimmerman R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Goldberg J
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
GL-92-08, GL-92-8, TAC-M85616, TAC-M85617, NUDOCS 9409260109
Download: ML17352A792 (5)


Text

pe REC0

.c~

~o I

0O 0

IP

~O

.+.+*++

l UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 2055&0001 September 19, 1994 Hr. J.

H. Goldberg President Nuclear Division Florida Power and Light Company P.O.

Box 14000 Juno

Beach, Florida 33408-0420

SUBJECT:

FOLLOW-UP TO THE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING GENERIC LETTER 92-08 ISSUED PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 50.54(f)

ON DECEMBER 20, 1993 TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 AND 4 (TAC NOS.

H85616 AND M85617)

Dear Hr. Goldberg:

We have reviewed your letter dated February 7,

1994, which responded to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's request for additional information regarding Generic Letter 92-08, "Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barriers."

Portions of your response that were either deferred or specified the use of a performance-based

approach, which is not being pursued by the staff, require updating.

Therefore, we request that you revise your response to our December 20, 1993, letter.

In a Staff Requirements Memorandum (SRM) of June 27,

1994, "Options for Resolving the Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Issues,"

the Commission (with all Commissioners agreeing) approved the NRC staff recommendation to return plants to compliance with existing NRC requirements and to permit plant-specific exemptions where technically justified.

In addition, in the SRM, the Commission approved the staff recommendation not to proceed with the development of a, performance-based approach to resolve the Thermo-Lag issue.

By letter dated August 11,

1994, we informed you that we did not plan to review your performance-based approach.

Your February 7,

1994, response indicated that you were awaiting the final results of the industry test program in order to determine your'inal plans and schedules.

The industry Thermo-Lag fire endurance test program has been completed and the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) has provided guidance to the industry for evaluating Thermo-Lag fire barriers.

The NRC staff will review the application of the NEI guide on a plant-specific basis.

You are now required to submit the information specified in the 10 CFR 50.54(f) 'letter for those areas where you stated that you were relying on the results of the NEI program.

The information submitted for the following sections was either deferred or referenced a performance-based approach:

Section II, "Important Barrier Parameters";

Section III, "Thermo-Lag Fire Barriers Outside the Scope of the NUMARC,Program";Section IV "Ampacity Derating";Section V, "Alternatives";

Section VI, "Schedules,"

You are required, pursuant to Section 182a of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as

amended, and 10 CFR 50.54(f), to submit a

written report that contains the required information within 90 days from the 9'409260109 940919 PDR ADOCK DSOD0250 P

PDR c20049 Imp PIlLI-'KEIICSI'V gP)I 'o

Hr. J.H.

Goldberg date of this letter.

Please retain all information and documentation used to prepare your response on site for future NRC audits or inspections.

Our August 9, 1994, letter regarding this issue for your St. Lucie facility provided additional background information including guidance on exemptions.

We are reviewing your June 15,

1994, exemption request concerning the use of Thermo-Lag fire barrier's in outdoor fire areas at Turkey Point and have established a target date of March 15, 1995, to complete our review.

The information collection contained in this request is covered by the Office of Management and Budget clearance number 3150-0011, which expires July 31, 1997.

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is covered by the original estimate and previous increase, which totaled 420 person-hours for each addressee's

response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Information and Records Management Branch (T-6 F33),

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202 (3150-0011),

Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503.

There are unresolved technical issues regarding ampacity derating.

However, it is the staff's view'that these issues can be resolved independently of the fire endurance issues.

We acknowledge that previous schedular commitments may be modified by your revised response.

If you have any questions about this

matter, please contact R.P.

Croteau at (301) 504-1475 or Edward Connell at (301) 504-2838.

Docket Nos.

50-250 and 50-251 Sincerely, Original s gned by Roy P.

Zimmerman Associate Director for Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: See'next page DISTRIBUTION:

~Docket'i l e PUBLIC PDII-2 RF S.

Varga ACRS (10)

FILENAME - G:iTP85616.RPC VHcCree Region II RIngram GLainas CMcCracken

GHulley, OIG RCroteau EConnell EPawli k, RIII/OI

~ EDunnington CBerlinger OGC MGamberoni RJenkins OFFICE LA:PD PH:PD NAME Dunnin tonp" RCroteau C:SPL CHcCracken PD'PD VNcCree/

G in ADP R r2-Zimmkdman COPY es No DATE 8 + 94 8

94 es No V/

/94 es/No k/s /94 Yes/No

/

94

. es/N 9// 1/94 Yes o

e I

1i

, o~P Mr. J.

H. Goldberg Florida Power and Light Company CC:

Harold F. Reis, Esquire Newman and Holtzinger, P.C.

1615 L Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20036 Jack Shreve, Public Counsel Office of the Public Counsel c/o The Florida Legislature 111 West Madison Avenue, Room 812 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1400 John T. Butler, Esquire

Steel, Hector and Davis 4000 Southeast Financial Center Miami, Florida 33131-2398 Mr. Thomas F. Plunkett, Site Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power and Light Company P.O.

Box 029100 Miami, Florida 33102 Joaquin Avino County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County 111 NW 1st Street, 29th Floor Miami, Florida 33128 Senior Resident Inspector Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O.

Box 1448 Homestead, Florida 33090 Mr. Bill Passetti Office of Radiation Control Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1317 Winewood Blvd.

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Turkey Point Plant Units 3 and 4

Mr. Joe Myers, Director Division of Emergency Preparedness Department of Community Affairs 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, N.W. Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs The Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Plant Manager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power and L'ight Company P.O.

Box 029100 Miami, Florida 33102 Mr. H.

N. Paduano, Manager Licensing

& Special Programs Florida Power and Light Company P.O.

Box 14000 Juno

Beach, Florida 33408-0420 Mr. Edward J.

Weinkam Licensing Manager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant P.O.

Box 4332 Princeton, Florida 33032-4332