ML17352A517
| ML17352A517 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/22/1994 |
| From: | Jerrica Johnson NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Goldberg J FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9404110208 | |
| Download: ML17352A517 (89) | |
Text
MAR 22 l994 Docket Nos.
50-250, 50-251 License Nos.
DPR-31, DPR-41 Florida Power and Light Company ATTN:
Hr. J.
H. Goldberg President
- Nuclear Division P. 0.
Box 14000 Juno
- Beach, FL 33408-0420 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT'EETINGS TO DISCUSS TURKEY POINT SELF-ASSESSHENT AND UNIT 3 OUTAGE This letter refers to the meetings conducted at your request at the NRC Region II offices in Atlanta on Harch 15, 1994.
The purposes of the meetings were to allow Florida Power and Light to make presentations on Turkey Point self-assessment and on the upcoming Turkey Point Unit 3 outage.
It is our opinion that these meetings were beneficial and provided a better understanding of the issues and status of current programs.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice,"
Part 1,
Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
. Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please let us know.
Sincerely,
Enclosures:
1.
List of Attendees 2.
Self-Assessment Presentation Summary 3.
Unit 3 Outage Presentation Summary cc w/encls:
H. N. Paduano, Hanager Licensing It Special Projects Florida Power and Light Company P. 0.
Box 14000 Juno
- Beach, FL 33408-0420 cc w/encls cont'd:
(See page 2)
Jon R. Johnson, Acting Director Division of Reactor Projects q404Ji0208 000250 8 +40322 PDP ADOC~
PDR P
Florida Power 8 Light Company cc w/encls cont'd:
L.
W. Pearce Plant General Hanager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant P. 0.
Box 029100
- Hiami, FL 33102 T.
F. Plunkett Site Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant P. 0.
Box 029100
- Hiami, FL 33102 T. Y. Abbatiello Site guality Hanager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant P. 0.
Box 029100
- Hiami, FL 33102 E. J.
Weinkam Licensing Hanager P. 0.
Box 4332
- Hiami, FL 33032-4332 Harold F. Reis, Esq.
Newman and Holtzinger, P.C.
1615 L Street, NW Washington, D.
C.
20036 John T. Butler, Esq.
- Steel, Hector and Davis 4000 Southeast Financial Center
- Hiami, FL 33131-2398 Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs The Capitol Tallahassee, FL 32304 Bill Passetti Office of Radiation Control 1317 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-0700 Jack Shreve Public Counsel c/o The Florida Legislature 111 West Hadison Avenue, Room 812 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1400 cc w/encls cont'd:
(See page 3)
Florida Power 5 Light Company bcc w/encls:
R. Croteau, NRR K. Landis, RII Document Control Desk Thomas P. Johnson Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0.
Box 1448 Homestead, FL 33090 RII:DRP RI 'P RII:DRP aq) S RScPin L ndis NSinkule 3~94 3/+94 3/g.l/94 G:XTPHTG394.SUM
ENCLOSURE 1
LIST OF ATTENDEES FOR TURKEY POINT SELF-ASSESSMENT PRESENTATION NRC S.
D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II (RII)
J.
R. Johnson, Acting Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), RII A. F. Gibson, Director, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS), RII J.
P. Stohr, Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards (DRSS), RII H.
N. Berkow, Director, Project Directorate II-2, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)
W.
E. Cline, Chief, Radiological Protection and Emergency Preparedness
- Branch, DRSS, RII M. V. Sinkule, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 2, DRP, RII K. D. Landis, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 2B (RP2B),
DRP, RII T.
P. Johnson, Senior Resident Inspector, Turkey Point R.
P. Schin, Project Engineer,
- RP2B, DRP, RII R.
P. Croteau, Project Manager, Project Directorate II-2, NRR M. Thomas, Reactor Inspector, Test Programs
H.
W. H.
J.
E.
T.
F.
L.
W.
M. B.
R. S.
V.
A'.
E. J.
- Goldberg, President, Nuclear Division Bohlke, Vice President, Nuclear Engineering and Licensing
- Geiger, Vice President, Nuclear Assurance
- Plunkett, Vice President, Turkey Point
- Pearce, Plant General
- Manager, Turkey Point
- Wayland, Maintenance
- Manager, Turkey Point Kundalkar, Engineering
- Manager, Turkey Point Kaminskas, Services
- Manager, Turkey Point Weinkam, Licensing Manager, Turkey Point
Enclosure I
LIST OF ATTENDEES FOR TURKEY POINT UNIT 3 OUTAGE PRESENTATION NRC H.
N. Berkow, Director, Project Directorate II-2, NRR J.
P.
- Jaudon, Acting Deputy Director, DRP, RII M. V. Sinkule, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 2, DRP, RII K. 0. Landis, Chief,
- RP2B, DRP, RII J. J.
Blake, Chief, Materials and Processes Section (MPS),
DRS, RII T.
P. Johnson, Senior Resident Inspector, Turkey Point R.
P. Schin, Project Engineer,
- RP2B, DRP, RII R.
P. Croteau, Project Hanager, Project Directorate II-2, NRR M. Thomas, Reactor Inspector, Test Programs
- Section, DRS, RII J.
L. Coley, Reactor Inspector,
- MPS, DRS, RII D.
B. Forbes, Radiation Specialist, Facilities Radiation Protection Section, DRSS,'RII FPL T.
F.
L.
W.
P.
C.
E. J.
- Plunkett, Vice President, Turkey Point
- Pearce, Plant General
- Manager, Turkey Point Higgins, Outage
- Manager, Turkey Point Weinkam, Licensing Manager, Turkey Point
0
ENCLOSURE 2
Florida Power 8 Light Company c
cc
~
c 4.
?.
c)?'"
SELF - ASSESSMENT PRESENTATION March 15, 1994
TURKEY POlNT SELF-ASSESSMENT MARCH 15, 1994 SECTION Introduction Plant Operations Maintenance Engineering Plant Support Closing Remarks SPEAKER T. F. Plunkett L. W. Pearce M. B. Wayland R. S. Kvndalkar V. A. Kaminskas J. H. Goldberg PAGE
<< ~
I8 41 54 69
INTRODUCTION
TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT ORGANIZATIONCHART SITE VICE PRESIDENT T. F. PL NKETT ENGINEERING MANAGER R. S. KUNDAI.KAR PLANTGENERAL MANGER L.W. PEARCE SERVICES MANAGER V. A. KAMINSKAS BUSINESS SYSTEMS MANAGER J.R.HARTZOG LICENSING MANAGER E.J. WEINKAM HUMANRESOURCES MANAGER R. B. MARSHALL MATERIALS MANAGER R. E. ROSE MAINTENANCE MANAGER M. B. WAYLAND SITE CONSTRUCTIO MANAGER J. MARCHESE OPERATIONS MANAGER D. E. JERNIGAN OUTAGE MANAGER P. C. HIGGINS TECHNICAL MANAGER D. R. POWELL
120 MONTHLYTURNOVER (Since 8(24(92) 100 80 60 40 20 22 37 57 64 70 78 84 92 98 98 98 0
Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug
UNIT AVAILABILITYFACTOR (1991 - 1993)
PERCENTAGE 100 80 60 65.4 85.4 II UNITS 5 UNIT4 40 20 22.3 1991 (DLIO) 1992 YEAR 1993
UDI UTILITYDATA BASE NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS RANKED BY 1993 MDC NET CAPACITY FACTOR RANK 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12'3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 UNITNAME CALVERTCLIFFS 1 DC COOK 1 HARRIS 1 OCONEE 3 PRAIRIE ISLAND 1 ARKANSAS ONE 2 HOPE CREEK 1 TURKEYPOINT 3 c
WATERFORD 3 FARLEY 1 DIABLOCANYON 1 LIMERICK 1 MILLSTONE 1 SUSQUEHANNA 2 SURRY 1 POINT BEACH 2 SEABROOK 1 POINTBEACH 1 BRAIDWOOD 1 NINE MILE POINT 1 OCONEE 1
PALO VERDE 3 OYSTER CREEK 1 FERMI 2 VOGTLE 2 THREE MILE ISLAND 1 VOGTLE 1 CALJAWAY1 KEWAUNEE 1 GINNA 1 PRAIRIE ISLAND2 CRYSTAL RIVER 3 OCONEE 2 ARKANSASONE 1 PEACH BOTTOM 2 COMANCHE PEAK 2 NINE MILE POINT 2 CATAWBA2 MILLSTONE2 MONTICELLO 1 DIABLOCANYON 2 SAN ONOFRE 2 TURKEY POINT 4 c DC COOK 2 LIMERICK2 WOLF CREEK 1 LA SALLE 1 DAVIS BESSE 1
GRAND GULF 1 BYRON 2 1993 MDC CAPACITYFACTOR 101.10 100.00 99.82 99.80 98.90 97.70 97.70 97.00 97.00 96.01 93.90 91.20 91.10 89.80 89.50 88.60 88.00 87.80 87.30 87.20 87.10 86.60 85.70 85.50 85.30 85.00 85.00 84.10 83.70 83.40 82.80 82.59 82.50 82.30 82.30 81.79 81.59 81.40 81.30 80.80 79.60 79.30 79.18 78.90 78.75 K
300 TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR REFUELING OUTAGE DURATIONS 263 250 33 200 18 150 O
100 50 63 1986 1987 1988 1989 19SO 1991 19S2 1993
TURKEY POINT VIOLATIONS/YEAR (1986-1993)
VIOLATIONS 50 44 40 30 27 20 10 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 YEAR 1991 1992 1993
MAJOR SITE ACCOMPLISHMENTS Continuing "no lost time accident" record o
Reduction in personnel radiation exposure o
Record completion time for a refueling outage Significant periods of continuous operation for each unit high individual unit and site dual unit availability first period of greater than 200 days continuous operation for each unit o
Second SRO certification program for management ten management students o
Opening of child development center and satellite school
TURKEY POINT PLANT OBJECTIVES o
Achieve and maintain high nuclear safety performance o
Position Turkey Point as a preferred economic choice for electrical generation o
Maximize the equivalent availability of Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 G
Maximize the effectiveness of the Turkey Point workforce 10
PLANT OPERATIONS
CURRENT OPERATlNG STATUS
CHALLENGES a
Keep pace with industry and regulatory initiatives to enhance nuclear safety, and continue to foster a safety culture Nuclear Safety Speakout program Condition Reports o
Complete two refueling outages on schedule and within budget o
Continue to improve personnel performance 13
MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS o
Management oversight of all sensitive evolutions 0-ADM-217 (Infrequent Evolutions) o Use of Red Sheets to control critical activities o
Operations Procedure Enhancements QA review of Crystal River EOP inspection ONOPs upgraded to two-column format o
Shift Management (ANPS) in Control Room Oversight of unit operations Total involvement in each aspect of unit operation o
Self Assessment by Operations Management Performed by licensed SRO's Transmitted expectations from management to operators Provide a regular feedback mechanism to/from the operators o
Operators expected to be critical of equipment performance 4.
Maintenance
- 5. Outage Management 6.
Licensing o
Shutdown Risk Assessment Team Contingency plans Outage Schedule Revisions Team departments:
1.
Technical 2.
Engineering 3.
Operations 14
INPO ACCREDITATIONTEAM RESULTS Six Operations Training Programs reaccredited Non-licensed Reactor Operator Senior Reactor Operator Nuclear Plant Supervisor Licensed Operator Continuing Shift Technical Advisor o
No findings o
Three strengths identified Training timely, relevant, responsive to plant changes and evolutions Improved and accelerated methodology to improve learning Effective method to identify, track, and implement program changes 15
OPERATOR EXAM RESULTS o
NRC Generic Fundamentals Exams - 93/94 91% passed o
Licensed Operator Annual Requal for 2/93 96% passed o
Licensed Operator Annual Requal for 2/94 95% passed 16
FUTURE EFFORTS Continue to emphasize personnel performance Self checking Procedure/Policy Adherence Promote individual accountability o
Concentrate on improving training to upgrade Non-Licensed Operator performance Complete ONOP upgrade o
Equipment Performance Maintain high safety system availability Improve secondary plant efficiency 17
MAINTENANCE
o CONTINUED EMPHASIS ON OPTIMIZING EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE CONTINUED EMPHASIS ON PLANT MATERIALCONDITION o
PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE PROGRAM ENHANCEMENTS o
OUTAGE PERFORMANCE o
SURVEILLANCES o
SELF ASSESSMENT EFFORTS AREAS OF CURRENT EFFORT o
SUMMARY
19
o CONTINUED EMPHASIS ON OPTIMIZING EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE Reduction in Equipment Deficiencies in the Plant Non-Outage Corrective Maintenance Backlog Reduced to a New Low of 278 (3/9/94)
Control Room Deficiencies Reduced to a New Low of 8 for Both Units Control Room Instruments Out of Service Reduced to a New Low of 4 for Both Units Corrective Maintenance Backlog Age Curve Remaining Below Target 20
2500 PLANT CM BACKLOGTREND CURVE TROUBLE & BREAKDOWN GOOD
~ 2000 0- 1500
- u. 1000 0
500 1900 700 1352 1071 808
- NOTE: 3/9/94 NO. OF PWO'S 278 767 674 550 350 ACTUALS TARGET 435
- 331 3/87 3/88 12/88 12/89 DATE 12/90 12/91 12/92 12/93
CONTROL ROOM DEFICIENCYTAGS 250 0
>- 200 0
~ 150 D
0K Lj 100 50 5/M 5/91 22
CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS OUT OF SERVICE
~ 200 K
5 150 100 214 159 5/9$
400 33$
GORREGTIVE INAINTENANGEBACKLOGAGE CURVE GOOD 300 0
0 200 K
100 0
0
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ g "A-...
aoo 9
AGE IN MONTHS ACTUAl TARGET goo
~
12 15 24
o EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE (cont.)
Safety System Unavailability 1993 Emergency Diesel Generators PWR Median (1/90 - 12/92) 0.015 - 0.020 Turkey Point 3A EDG 1993 Unavailability 0.000 Turkey Point 3B EDG 1993 Unavailability 0.002 Turkey Point 4A EDG 1993 Unavailability 0.002 Turkey Point 4B EDG 1993 Unavailability 0.002 Auxiliary Feedwater System PWR Median (1/90 - 12/92) 0.007 - 0.012 Turkey Point Unit 3 AFW 1993 Unavailability 0.007 Turkey Point Unit 4 AFW 1993 Unavailability 0.007 Safety Injection System PWR Median (1/90 - 12/92) 0.005 - 0.010 Turkey Point Unit 3 Sl 1993 Unavailability 0.011 Turkey Point Unit 4 Sl 1993 Unavailability 0.012 (Unavailability Above Median Due to 4A SI Pump Equalizing Line Repair)
No Unplanned Safety System Actuations in 1993 and 1994 to Date 25
o EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE (cont.)
Forced Outage Rate 1.8'/o for Unit 3, 2.0'/o for Unit 4, 1992 Industry Average 6.9 'or PWRs One Unplanned Auto Trip While Critical in SALP period.
None Attributed to Maintenance Activities Unplanned Days Off Line Remain Low MOV Component Failures Remain Below the Industry Average Continued Conservative Satisfaction of ASME Section XI Requirements Through Effective Implementation of ISI Program.
Examples of Conservative Implementation Include:
Performance of 100/o Eddy Current Inspection of All Three Steam Generators Each Refueling Hand Stroking of All Snubbers on the Associated Unit Each Refueling to Identify Any Potential Frozen Snubbers 26
TURKEYPOINT UNITS 3 & 4 UNPLANNED DAYS OFF LINE 500 400 410
+o300 0
g 200 199 255
~
DUALUNITOUTAGE(PLANNED)
UNIT3 12/1280 - 10/1/91 UNIT4 11/24/90 - 10/29/91 100 59 23 23 1987 1988 1989 1990
'EAR 1991 '992 (EXCLUDINGANDREW) 1993
10 MOVCOMPONENT FAILURE RATE Turke Point industry 8
0 l1IZ 6
0 co CL Lu 0
m O
CC.
I1I I CL 4
fo lU CL" 7.06 i 4.48 4.47
- 54""""""'"'"""
S.SS 4.04 3.26
. 2.69 2.64 1987 1991 28
o CONTINUED EMPHASIS ON PLANT MATERIALCONDO ION Area Upgrades Completed During This SALP Period Unit 3 Emergency Diesel Generators Auxiliary Building Pipeway Unit 4 Pipe and Valve Room Unit 3 and 4 Electrical Penetration Rooms Unit 3 Spent Fuel Pool Unit 3 and 4 Feedwater Platform Unit 3 and 4 Condenser Pit and Pump Area Unit 3 and 4 Discharge Area CVCS Hold-Up Tanks Monitor Tank Room Unit 3 and 4 Turbine Deck Auxiliary Building Fan Room Unit 3 Chemistry Sample Room Limited Painting in Unit 4 Containment Weekly Management Walkdown Program Used to Monitor and Enhance Plant Material Condition Area Supervisor Included in Walkdown to Reinforce Ownership and Accountability Outstanding Walkdown Items Tracked in Maintenance Department Monthly Indicators Primary and Secondary Plant Leaks Tracked as an Indicator in the Plan of the Day Recoverable Contaminated Floor Space Reduced to Less than 2000 Square Feet During Non-Outage Periods 29
o PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE Lost Time Accident Record Continues.
Over 8.5 Million Man-Hours (1323 Days) Without a Lost Time Accident (As of 3/9/94)
Enhanced l&C Procedure Adherence Work Practices Have Contributed to No IBC Related Plant Trips in over 4 1/2 Years.
Recognized by INPO as a Strength STAR
- Stop, Think, Act, Review Procedure Readers Used to AllowTechnician to Focus on Component and Performance Tasks with High Potential for Causing a Plant Trip Observed by Responsible IBC Supervisor Continued Reductions in Maintenance Department Overtime.
14.5% Average for 1993 Including the Unit 4 Refueling Outage Maintenance Manager and Mechanical Maintenance Department Head Successfully Completed SRO Certification Program for Managers 33 Additional Maintenance Personnel Completed Supervisor Training Course 30
o PROGRAM ENHANCEMENTS Preventive Maintenance (PM) Optimization Program Established to Review PM Tasks for Effectiveness Engineering Support for Plant Work Order (PWO) Backlog Reduction Efforts Dedicated Engineering Team Assigned in 8/92 to Address PWO's on Hold for Engineering Support Initial Scope of Project Involved 81 PWO Packages Team Demobilized in 7/93. A Total of 246 PWO's Addressed Including All 81 PWO's Originally Identified.
PWO Support Continues to be Provided As Needed 31
o PROGRAM ENHANCEMENTS (cont.)
Maintenance Specifications Generated by Engineering Expedite Repairs of Plant Equipment.
Specifications Issued in 1993 Include:
Maintenance Bolting Valves Installation and Use of Permanent Rigging Attachments Minor Repair of Electrical Insulation of Motors Piping and Equipment Flanges Evaluation and Acceptance of Pipe Surface Imperfections 32
o PROGRAM ENHANCEMENTS (cont.)
INPO Assistance Visit Conducted in Maintenance Planning Area.
Maintenance Planning Supervisor and Support Supervisor Participated as Team Members.
Team Recommendations Incorporated to Date Include:
Improvements Made to Content of Planned Work Package to Reduce Craft Planning in the Field Improved Mechanism for Craft Feedback on Quality of Work Packages Including Provision for Response to Craft Comments Maintenance Planners Periodically Monitor Craftsmen Use of Work Packages the Planners have Prepared to Provide Direct Feedback Maintenance Planners Attend Selected Training to Improve Technical Knowledge of Plant Systems, Equipment and Modifications
.Parts Staging Policy Defined and Implemented Upgrade of Maintenance Procedures is Ahead of Schedule.
Initial Backlog was 75 when Assigned to Maintenance Department in 1992.
Only 2 Procedures Left to be Upgraded.
Condition Report Program Emphasizes Identification and Correction of Root Cause of Equipment Problems.
Condition Reports are Reviewed and Trended to Identify and Resolve Recurring Equipment Problems 33
o OUTAGE PERFORMANCE Detailed Scope and Development Started Well in Advance of Outage Start Date (Minimum of 8 Months)
Outage Scope Controlled by Senior Plant Management Review and Approval per Plant Administrative Procedures Outage Schedule Prepared by Individuals with SRO Experience Risk Assessment Team Reviews Schedule Prior to and During the Outage Relating to Shut Down Risk Issues Senior Plant Managers Assigned as Shift Directors Around the Clock to Provide Oversight Commencing with the Upcoming Unit 3 Outage, Rework Condition Stamps will be Used to Code Outage Activities as to the Plant Condition Required to Rework the Component if it Should Fail
o OUTAGE PERFORMANCE (cont.)
Unit 4 Outage Results Have Been Positive Scheduled 53 Day Refueling Outage Completed in 46 Days Emergent Work Accounted for 2.4% of Original Outage Scope Manhours Cancelled Work Accounted for 0.4% of Original Outage Scope Manhours Unit has Run Well Since the Outage 35
o SURVEILLANCES Previous SALP Period 14 Licensee Event Reports Regarding Surveillance - Related Problems This SALP Period ) Licensee Event Report Regarding Sur veillance - Related Problems Approximately 5000 Surveillances Performed to Date During This SALP Period LER Submitted for One Missed Surveillance (2/21/94}
Last Missed Surveillance Occurred in September 1992 Implemented Additional Corrective Actions Surveillances Within 96 Hours of Drop-Dead Highlighted in Plan of the Day Specific Responsibility for Tracking of Maintenance Surveillances Assigned to PM Planners PM Schedule Dates on Plant Work Order the Same as Surveillance Tracking Program NPS Review Each Shift of Surveillance Schedule to Identify Items Within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of Drop-Dead Date.
Responsible Department Management Notified
o SELF-ASSESSMENT EFFORTS Self-Assessments Contribute to Sustained Maintenance Performance Key Aspects of Maintenance Are Effectively Monitored Through the Use of Self-Assessment Activities Foreign Material Exclusion Feedback from QC Since Self-Assessment was Completed in 1992 Indicates Recommendations Implemented Have Been Effective MOV Program - GL 89-10 NRC Inspections Following Self-Assessments Resulted in No Findings Maintenance Planning - Recommendations from INPO Assistance Visit Implemented.
Results Being Monitored INPO Identified Turkey Point Maintenance Self-Assessment as a Strength from 1993 Evaluation Maintenance has Initiated a Quarterly Review of LER's, QC Inspection Reports and Condition Reports to Identify Trends Indicating Areas Where Maintenance Improvements Can be Achieved Additional Maintenance Management On-Shift to Provide Oversight for Critical Activities 37
o AREAS OF CURRENT EFFORT Plan and Effectively Perform 46 Day Refueling Outages for Both Units With Reliable Operation During Subsequent Cycle Continue to Optimize the Reliability of Plant Equipment Emphasize Improvements in Personnel Performance Ensure Performance of Quality Maintenance Such That Equipment is Reliable Following Repairs Continue to Improve Supervisor Skills Reinforcing Their Responsibility to Communicate Management Expectations to the Journeymen Reinforce Management Expectations in the Area of Attention to Detail Relating to Conduct of Maintenance Continue Self-Assessment Efforts Initiating Improvement Activities to Further Enhance Maintenance Performance 38
o
SUMMARY
1992 Unit Availability Factor Prior to Hurricane Andrew:
Unit 3 - 92.2%, Unit 4-94.6%
1992 Unit Availability Factor Including Hurricane Andrew:
Unit 3 - 65.5%, Unit 4 - 85.4%
AII Necessary Equipment Functioned as Required During the Hurricane Unit Availability has Continued to improve During Current SALP Period 1993 Unit Availability Factor: Unit 3 - 96.1%,
Unit 4 - 83.1% (with refueling outage)
Continuous Record Run of 253 Days for Unit 3 Continuous Record Run of 204 Days for Unit 4 0
No Maintenance Related Auto Trips During This or Previous SALP Period No I&C Related Plant Trips in Over 4 1/2 Years 1993 Forced Outage Rate Below Industry Average:
Unit 3-1.8%, Unit 4-2.0%
1992 Industry Average AllTypes - 10.9%, PWR - 6.9%
39
o
SUMMARY
(cont.)
No Unplanned Safety System Actuations During This SALP Period Unplanned Days Off Line Remain Low Continued Reductions in Non-Outage Corrective Maintenance Backlog, Control Room Deficiencies, Control Room Instruments Out of Service Completion of Scheduled 53 Day Unit 4 Refueling Outage in 46 Days.
Unit has Run Well During This Cycle Turkey Point's 1993 Performance Ranks High Among Nuclear Plants in the United States 40
ENGINEERING
ON-LINE SUPPORT o
Focus on Operating Plant Support On - Site Engineering - Real Time Support (45)
On - Site Tech Staff - System and Reactor Engineering, ISI and IST, and STAs (57)
Off - Site Engineering - Long Term Projects (45) o Problem Resolution - Root Cause and Corrective Actions ECC Solenoid Valves Flux Mapper Turbine Trip Valve Pzr Manway Repair Sl Pump Repair 6A/6B Feedwater Heater Relief Valves Lesson Learned:
o Program Initiated to Identify and Correct Operator Work-Arounds Operations Surveyed to Identify Work-Arounds Engineering Completed Operability Assessments Issue Resolutions In Progress 42
OUTAGE SUPPORT o
Effective Work Planning Plant 5 Year Plan Project Review Board Prioritization - Top 20/30 List 95% of Top 20 Outage Packages Completed 90 Days Before Outage o
Conservative Actions During Outages Outage Shutdown Risk Management Procedure Specifies Minimum Equipment for Critical Safety Functions Regular Inter-Departmental Reviews of Planned Evolutions Use of Contingency Plans Task Ownership System Engineers Outage Task Managers Design Engineers On-Site for Package Implementation Lessons Learned:
o Increase Design Engineer Involvement in the Post-Mod Testing Process for Complex Modifications Developed Procedures o
Erosion/Corrosion Additional Inspection Locations Based on Operating Practices 43
MAINTENANCESUPPORT o
Engineering Maintenance Specifications
. 8 Completed, 5 New Specs Planned Received INPO Strength o
Preventive Maintenance Review Valid Requirements Established for Existing PMs Additions, Changes, and Deletions Based on EPRI, Industry, and Vendor Data o
I & C Setpoint Document Complete Includes Over 2300 Safety and Non-Safety Setpoints o
Improving Equipment Data Bases, Eliminate Redundancy Eliminate Stand-Alone Valve and Instrument Indices Co ntinuin Efforts o
System Engineers Lead System Reliability Improvement Teams Charging System Condensate Polishing System Overall Valve Program G
Mechanical Setpoint Review ln Progress
- Completion in 1994 44
MAJOR ENGINEERING EFFORTS THIS SALP PERIOD:
o Drawing Enhancements:
New PBIDs Completed - Clear, CAD Based Compilation of Old TEs, Code Boundary Drawings Verified by Walkdowns Drawing Update Backlog Eliminated Reliability Improvements Core Exit Thermocouple Nozzle Assembly Upgrade New Source Range Detectors Instrument Air System Upgrade - Engineering Complete Cold Chemistry Lab - Complete by December 1994 Cranking Diesel Generator Elimination PLA - Under NRC Review Post Hurricane Enhancements Upgrade of the Communication System (UHF, VHF,
. HFALE, Satellite Phones)
Hardened Shell Central Receiving Facility Small Bore High Energy Piping Study Both Units 100% Debris Resistant Fuel by End of Year 45
~
Q
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ f
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
Turkey Point Fuel Reliability (10/93 - 12/93) 30 N
~ 20 0
6)
~ 10 Unit 4 5.0E%6 IIIIIIIII 19 II Unit 3 1.1&34 12 Fuel Defect Reference S.OEC4 I
I I
I 26 i
Turkey Point 69 units 0
1E-07 1E-06 1E-05 1E-04 1E-03 1E-02 1E-01 1E+00 1E+01 I-131 activity (microcuries/gram) 47
CONTINUING EFFORTS o
Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Review of Maintenance Scheduling and Clearance Requests
'esign Process Applications Cranking Diesel Elimination Prioritization of MOVs for GL 89-10 IPE External Event Report to be Completed by June 1994 o
Increased Secondary Plant Thermal Performance Average Net MWe Regained per Unit - 10 MWe o
Thermal Uprate Project 48
REGULATORY ISSUES Timel Resolution Cold Overpressure Mitigation System o
Salem Rod Withdrawal Event o
Dedicated Effort to Improve Timeliness and Quality of Submittals All Submittals in SALP Period were within Time Limits Project Managers Have Commended the Quality and Completeness of Submittals to NRR Continuin Efforts o
MOV GL 89-10 Progress NRC Phase II Audit Completed - 5 Strengths Noted o
Cost Beneficial License Amendments Systematic Approach to Prioritization o
Maintenance Rule Progress Staff PRA, Site Engineering, and Tech Staff Departments Developing Program o
Thermolag Progress Unique Performance Based Approach 49
COMMITMENTTO TECHNICAL EXCELLENCE o
In-House Engineering 87% ln-House Drawing Update In-House o
A/E Oversight Improvement o
Department Policies to Ensure Selection of Reliable Equipment o
Strong Self-Assessment Techniques Functional Reviews of Modifications, Evaluations, and Processes Technical Alerts Review of Condition Reports for Trends o
Continuing Training 7 Engineering/Technical Staff Manager/Supervisory Personnel SRO Licensed or Certified Technical Staff Personnel Completed 50.59 Training Engineering Support Personnel Training Based on INPO Guidelines for Engineers 50
TURKEY POINT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FPL VS A/E MANHOUR COMPARISON DECEMBER 1993 100%
87 80%
Ct G
60%
40%
LL O
0 20%
65%
35~
77%
LEGEND FPL A/E
~~23%
13' e~g 0%
1991 1992 1993
BACKLOG REDUCTION o
Temporary System Alteration (TSA) Reduction; Active TSAs Reduced From 14 at End of 1992 to 6 at Present o
NCR Backlog Eliminated; CR Backlog c 25 Days o
Procurement Engineering Backlog at Lowest Level Since Creation of PE o
No Open INPO SOER Recommendations in Engineering; After Unit 4 Refueling Outage (Fall, 1994), no Open INPO SOER Recommendations at Turkey Point o
PCM Backlog Reduction; Open PCMs Reduced From 503 at End of 1992 to 141 at Present Summary o
Engineering/Technical Staff Contributions Reflected in Plant Performance Indicators 52
TURKEY POINT PLANT OPEN PC/M
SUMMARY
1,400 1,200 1,000 O
CL 800 LL0 600
,225
.176------- 1;176.
'I 145
$35 102 039 4) 704 537 503 1993 (PCG DEPARTMENTAL OBJECTIVE) 200 1990 1991 (DUO) 1992 (VP STRATEGlG
-TASKTEAM) '--- '!"'5 250 52 1
2 3
lZGEND:
~
12/89 1993 GOAI 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
QUARTER 53
PLANT SUPPORT 54
PLANT SUPPORT 1)
Chemistry 3)
Radiation Protection 4)
Fire Protection 5)
Security 55
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS o
Successful Evaluated Exercise - December 15, 1993 Strength noted:
Excellent performance of the Control Room (simulator) staff (NIR 93-27).
o Completed communications systems upgrades HF.
radios and satellite telephone system for long range communications.
Completed Plant Page System upgrades to address audibility problems in high noise areas.
o Natural Emergencies Procedure and Radiological Recovery Plan revised to incorporate Hurricane Andrew Lessons Learned.
o Tone Alert Radios distributed to public facilities to enhance offsite notifications.
o Addition of high wind meteorological instrumentation for recording severe weather data.
o Two Inspections of Emergency Preparedness Program.
Strength noted: Aggressive efforts in maintaining the operational readiness of the Technical Support Center and Emergency Operations Facility.
CONTINUED.EFFORTS o
Continue successful drill/exercise program.
o Implement new State Notification System to replace present State Hot Ring Down equipment.
56
CHEMISTRY MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS o
500% Eddy Current Testing on Unit4 Steam Generators resulted in no tubes plugged.
l o
Completed testing of new on-line monitoring instruments for Primary and Secondary, Systems.
o Completed installation of new Liquid Radwaste Processing System.
o Completed installation of new state-of-the-art Water Treatment Plant.
CONTINUED EFFORTS o
QC Program - procedures and computer programs.
o Completion of new Secondary Chemistry Laboratory and Online Monitoring System.
o 100% Eddy Current Testing of Steam Generators.
57 0
TURKEYPOINT CHENllSTRY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR FEB. 1993 - FFB. 4984 OA 0.36 0.3 UNfTRE%URN TO SERlACE FOU.OWNO OVfAGE 0.26 0.2 0.16
~ Q $
0.1 C ~
0.06 0
C ci)
FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUO SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB 58
UNIT 3 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE PLUG HISTORY STEAM GENERATOR PRESERVICE PLUGS TUBES PLUGGED PREVIOUS OUTAGES TUBES PLUGGED 10/92'OTAL TUBES PLUGGED 100% ECT OF ALLSTEAM GENERATOR TUBES 3200 TUBES PER STEAM GENERATOR 15 UNIT4 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE PLUG HISTORY STEAM GENERATOR PRESERVICE PLUGS TUBES PLUGGED PREVIOUS OUTAGES TUBES PLUGGED 4/93'OTAL TUBES PLUGGED 100% ECT OF ALLSTEAM GENERATOR TUBES 3200 TUBES PER STEAM GENERATOR 15 0
16 7
59
~
~
TURKEY POINT UNIT3 AND 4 AYERAGE STEAM GENERATOR BOWL DOSE 15 14 l3 m10 0n 9
8 m0 e
6 fO 5
U 4
3 2
I
~
~ ~".~.. ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ ~
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12 13
'i4 FUEL CYCLE UNIT 3 UNIT4
RADIOLOGICALCONTROLS AREAS OF MAJOR ACHIEVEMENT o
1993 personnel exposure was the lowest since beginning of plant operation.
o Installed CO2 decontamination system for equipment and tools.
o Maintained contaminated floor space <2000 square feet.
o Minimize dry active waste onsite.
Maximum of two shipping containers (<5000 cubic feet).
o Consolidated high-level waste stored onsite (non-fuel).
0 Instituted Supervisor Walkdowns to monitor implementation of Health Physics Good Practices.
Conducted self-assessment on the plant's readiness to implement the new 10 CFR Part 20 Rule changes.
o Radiation Protection Oversight Program - two strengths noted:
NIR 93-09:
"Current audit programs continue to be considered a program strength and continue to contribute to RP Program improvements..."
NIR 93-23: "... the licensee had an effective auditing function actively reviewing the RP Program."
CONTINUED'FFORTS o
Continued man-rem reduction.
o Reduction of contaminated material.
o Shipment of high level waste stored onsite.
62
TURKEYPOINT EXPOSURE HISTORY Unite Sk4 2681 ~
Steam Generator Replacement 2251 211 4 ]
tpp$
f4~
t 1255 1258 670 Oual Unit Outage 325 0
10,000 TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 L 4 CONTAMINATEDFLOOR SPACE 8,000 8,000 OlILe U'
4,000 2,000 1814 1714 1840 1991 Current to 2f28/94 64
40,000 TURKEYPOlNT UNlTS 3 8c 4 DRY ACTIVEWASTE VOLUMEON-SlTE 2i,000 IL V
C7 D
18,000 8,000 10/91 12/91 2/92 i/92 8/92 8/92 10/92 12/92 2/N 4)98 8/93 8/93 10/93 12/93 SN
FIRE PROTECTION MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS Reduced Non-outage Fire Protection Impairments to an average of 5 or less per day.
Fire Protection Impairments reviewed daily by Plant Management.
G Continuous Fire Watch hours reduced by 43%.
Improved coordination of work activities with Maintenance.
Increased priority on maintenance affecting Fire Protection equipment.
Expanded Fire Watch Training Program.
More in-depth training on fire protection issues.
Familiarization with other plant issues affecting fire protection and safety (e.g. scaffolding).
Increased Fire Brigade Requal Training Hours.
Added 12 additional hours to previous 20 hour2.314815e-4 days <br />0.00556 hours <br />3.306878e-5 weeks <br />7.61e-6 months <br /> schedule.
Metro Dade Fire Chief commended Turkey Point on the Fire Brigade Program.
o Promoted New Fire Protection Supervisor.
o Improved Transient Combustible Control Program.
Incorporated in Maintenance and Construction training.
Performance of weekly plant staff walkdowns.
CONTINUED EFFORTS o
Reduce quantity of flammable storage lockers.
o Enhance plant awareness of transient combustibles.
G Resolve Thermolag issue.
66
SECURITY MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS o
Completed Hurricane Andrew restoration of Security System.
o Installation of hand geometry for Protected Area access control.
o Completed gun range.
o Upgraded video capture system.
o Conducted large scale drill with Local Law Enforcement Agencies o
Operations Safeguards
Response
Evaluation (OSRE) - January 1994.
o Promoted new Security Department Supervisor.
CONTINUED EFFORTS a
Maintain high plant awareness of Security issues.
Complete Security Training Facility.
o Install moving Target System for gun range.
~.
e 67
1993 Security Loggable Events By Quarter 140 120 l-100 o3 80 0
0-60 tU Q3 40 D
20 58 87 48 30 Industry Avg - 114 PTN Goat - 96 0
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter QUARTERS
CLQSING REMARKS 69
NOTES 70
ENCLOSURE 3
Florida power 8 Light CompanY
\\
-/
~@~
<<V J VV rv<<
,I(A?<<
p <<r<<
<<I 3
~ V<< ~ ~ <<V <<<<<<<<
~ ~(
((<<<<<<'(%<<!,,
V
- <<,v.<< '<<)vrw3 bn I>>
P<<
<<',"gw('.
<<<<<<I
~ V V.;5~<'z'*,
4<<
,3'~
r
<<v<<V.
<<W<<
g:
~
v<<r,.r>> <<<<.,<<
~ 'vg<<%<<<<<<" 'r'r, v.+v&<<>>>I~<<v,;~'>>
V ~
ygg4 OUTA,GE UNIT3 CYCLE 14
NRC / Turkey Point Meeting 1994 Unit 3 Refueling Outage 4~4 March 15, 1994 Presented by:
Pat Higgins - Outage Manager
Turkey Point Plant Unit 3 1994 Refueling Outage Presentation to U.S.N.R.C.
Agenda
~
Schedule for Preparation
~
Overview of Outage I
Major work items scheduled Resources
~
Goals and Indicators Specific targets for 1994 Unit 3 Outage
~
Efforts to Minimize Operational Impacts Post-Outage
~
Outage Risk Assessment and Scope Control
~
Summary, Questions and Answers
1994 REFUELING OUTAGE SCHEDULE PREPARATION JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEVELOP US OUT. MNGMTIALL I.D. OUTJCR IOOPE V/IUDATESCOPE TECHIOPS HOLD YSTEM MEETINGS FOR CHEOULE DEVELOPMENT'SSU US SC REV. 0 EDULE ALLDEPT DEVELOP SYS WIIL
. IINGkff REVIEW ALLDEPTI issue FIR)T DRAFT m US scHEDULE DEC JAN ~~
FEB MAR APR MAY ISSUE DRAFTFl~
US SCHEDULE issueviNAL Us SCHEDULE OUT. MNGMTIALLDfPTI ID.
GE SCOPEIU4 AU DEPTI DEVELOP SYS WINIU4.
OUT. QNGITT AUDATESCOPEIUl TKCHIOPS.
I 04I04I94 UNIT8 flEFUELINGCYCLE 14 05I19I94 JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV ISSUE RR'RAFT U4 scAEDULE HQLDsYsTEM QEETINGs Fofl scHEDUL'E OUTAGE
~
~
~
UNIT4 REFUELING CYCLE 16 12I04I94 REV 03/02/94 O.
UNlT 3 CYCLE 14 REFUELlNG.OUTAGE 10
~ SHUTDOWN
~ COOLPOWN
~ RX DISASSEMBLY
~ CORE OFF LOAD OFFLOAD WINDOW 12
~
S/G ECT
~ RCP MOTOR/SEAlS
~ SAFETY BUS WOAK
~ EDG OVEAHAUL
~ CORE ONLOAD
~ RX RE-ASSEMBLY
~ SAFEGUARDS TEST
~ HEAT-UP
~ OVERPRESSURE TEST o ON-UNE 24 TURBINEGENERATOR INSPECTIONS a AEFUAB
~
INTAKEEATSTAUOTURE ENHANCEMENT~
MOVINSPECTIONS, ENIIANOEMENTSANDTESTS I GL+S.ID~
EROSION/CORROSION a ISI INSPECTION/REPAIR OUTAGE OAYS OATE 04/04 10 04/14 22 04/26 46 05/1 9
UI.'GT 3 REFUELING OUTAGE SCOPE OVERVIEW MAIN'I%NANCEDEPARTMENT
~
PWOs IMPLEMENTED-1,117 REPAIR/OVERHAULS VALVEREPACK REACTOR VESSEL DISASSEMBLY/REASSEMBLY, ETC.
MOTOR OVERHAULS REFUELING OUTAGE SURVEILLANCES
~
PCMs IMPLEMENTED-19 TECHNICAL
~
~
~
EROSION CORROSION PROGRAM COORDINATION
~
TASK MANAGERS FOR WORK OVERSIGHT CONSTRUCTION PCM MPUIMHNHD
~
ECT SUPPORT
~
'I'URB OVHQIAUL
~
ISI SUPPORT
-24
~
EROSION CORROSION SUPPORT J: XOMKDhThXNZSCKU3SCOPE. PCH
~
~
~
~
~
Y///~/
00 0 ~ ~ ~
////~/
I I
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 0
- /<///
0V Vo I
I OV0 ~ 0
~ 99 II III III I I II III 0'0'0 000
~ V',I e,'
~ ~ ~ ~
'o',OVO'0 0000000000'~000 ~ to or'0'0'0'0 0000\\ ~ 00
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ \\ 0 ~
,0,'000 00',OVO'0'
~ ~ 0 ~ '
oto ~ ~
~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 totoo ~ to toooo ~ to
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 0'0 ~
~ OV0 ~
~
0
~ R 0 ~
Q
~ ~ ~ ~
0 ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~
a i
~
P/
~
I
KEEP TURKEY POlNT ON TRACK OUTAGE GO 1994 UNIT 3 Refueling 1, NUCLEAR SAFEtY PROBLEM
- 2. PERSONNEL SAFIHV-LOST TIMEACCIDENTS
- 3. MEET OR BEAT THE OUTAGE SCHEDULE DUZUKTION
- 4. MEET OR BEAT THE OUTAGE BUDGET
- 5. PERSONNEL EXPOSURE LIMITS
- 6. PERSONNEL CONTAJNINATIONS
- 7. LAMINATEDFLOOR SPACE (<80 Days Post Out
- 8. CUBIC FEET OF WASTE GENERATED
- 9. OUTAGE RELATED SIGMFICANTCONDITIONREPO1UM
- 10. SECULARITYLOGGABLEEVENTS DURINGTHE OUTAGE ZERO ZERO 46 DAYS
< 21,500K 230 ManRem
< 80
< 2000 ft c 7000 ft 10
pg<S
.:,IuQ lip
.GRAM KEEP TURKEY POINT ON TRACK 1994 UNIT 3 Refueling REWORK CONDITION STAMPS
- 1. REWORK WILLREQUIRE A UNIT LOAD REDUCTION
- 2. REWORK WILLREQUIRE A UNITSHUTDOWN TO HOT-STANDBY
- 3. REWORK WILLREQUIRE A COLD SHUTDOWN
- 4. REWORK WILLREQUIRE RCS DRAIN DOWN
- 5. RFWORK WILLREQUIRE REACTOR DISASSEMBLY DO IT RIGHT THE FIRST TIME.
REWORK COSTS TIME & MONEY.
E RS
Outage Risk Assessment
~ Administrative procedure on risk developed to address Outage Risk Assessment and control.
Procedure reviewed and endorsed by FPL PRA group.
Procedure covers:
Decay Heat Removal Inventory Control On-site and Off-site Power Reactivity Control Shutdown Monitoring Instrumentation Fire Protection Functions Containment Closure
~
Schedule prepared by current and former Turkey Point Senior Reactor Operators using Administrative procedure on Outage Risk Assessment and Control.
~ Schedule is reviewed by independent "Risk Assessment Team" to ensure high degree of safety is maintained throughout outage.
Outage Scope Control
~ All additions and deletions to outage scope require approval by plant department heads and plant manager using plant administrative procedures.
Scheduled Activities of Special Interest to NRC
~ Eliminate turbine runback on dropped rod Integrated Schedule Modification 1246 PCM 93-005 Completed on Unit 4 last outage
~ Disassemble and inspect 3 Anchor-Darling swing check valves NRC Bulletin 89-2 commitment PCM 89-182 to replace studs on two of the valves (3-876A,E), at the same time
~ Inspect intake bay walls to confirm structural integrity PCM 93-125 for beam replacement
~ Complete modifications of MOVs Per Generic Letter 89-10, recommendations A-H PCMs93-115 and 93-152
~ MOV motor brake removal PCM 93-184 three valves willhave motors replaced; MOVs 865A,B,C
~ Replace DC relays INPO SOER 83-5, 'DC Power System Failures", was initiator Relavs identified as having marginal ratings PCM 93482
~ Replace solenoid operated air valves Initiated by NRC Information Notice 88-24, "Failure of Air-Operated Valves Affecting Safety-Related Systems" Two valves remain to be done