ML17346A956

Forwards Corrected Request for Addl Info Re Preliminary Review to Assess Completeness & Adequacy of Util Response to Generic Ltr 83-28.Info Re Items 2.2.2 & 4.5.3 Should Be Provided within 60 & 90 Days,Respectively

ML17346A956
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	04/04/1985
From:	Mcdonald D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Williams J FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
GL-83-28, TAC-53726, TAC-53727, TAC-54036, TAC-54037, NUDOCS 8504160602
Download: ML17346A956 (5)

Text

April 4, 1985 Docket Nos.

50-250 and 50-251 Mr. J.

W. Williams, Jr., Vice President Nuclear Energy Department Florida Power and Light Company Post Office Box 14000 Juno Beach, Florida 33408 Distribution ORB¹1 RDG OELD BGrimes DMcDonald ACRS (10)

TAlexion DBeckham tDoc.ket ftleH L PDR HThompson EJordan JPartlow CParrish ORB¹l Gray file DLasher

Reference:

TAC Numbers

53726, 53727, 54036 and 54037

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW OF TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 AND 4 RESPONSES TO GENERIC LETTER 83 CORRECTION By letter dated March 11,

1985, we indicated that the staff had completed a

preliminary review to assess the completeness and adequacy of your responses to Generic Letter 83-28 Items

2. 1, 2.2, 3. 1.3, 3.2.3, 4.4 and 4.5.

We indicated that additional information was required for Items 2.2 and 4.5.3.

However, your staff brought to our attention that we inadvertently attached the wrong enclosure.

We have enclosed the correct request for information (RAI) relative to the Turkey Point Plant.

We requested that the response to Item 2.2.2 be provided within 60 days and Item 4.5.3 within 90 days.

The 90 day schedule wil,l start when the staff completes its review of the referenced WCAP and Supplement.

The review is expected to be completed shortly.

Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience this error may have caused.

We have discussed the details of the RAI with your staff and the schedule for response should not be affected.

Sincerely, 8504160602 850404 7 PDR ADOCK 05000250 PDR l

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/enclosure:

See next page

/s/DGMcDonald McDonald ProJect Man g

Operating Reactors Branch ¹1 Division,of Licensing ORB¹1:DL OR CParrish DMcD nald/ts 04/f /85 04/Q /85

P 1

t r

I i ~

hg V

f l I

3

}r

[,I c

t

~~ ~.gCWs 4 g.I V

(

gP,S AEONS pl Cq"o OO Vl V/

gO

~>>*++

Docket Nos.

50-250 and 50-251 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 April 4, 1985 Mr. J.

W. Williams, Jr., Vice President Nuclear Energy Department Florida Power and Light Company Post Office Box 14000 Juno Beach, Florida 33408

Reference:

TAC Numbers

53726, 53727, 54036 and 54037

SUBJECT:

REtlUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW OF TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 AND 4 RESPONSES TO GENERIC LETTER 83 CORRECTION By letter dated March 11,

1985, we indicated that the staff had completed a

preliminary review to assess the completeness and adequacy of your responses to Generic Letter 83-28 Items 2. 1, 2.2, 3. 1.3, 3.2.3, 4.4 and 4.5.

We indicated that additional information was required for Items 2.2 and 4.5.3.

However, your staff brought to our attention that we inadvertently attached the wrong enclosure.

We have enclosed the correct request for information (RAI) relative to the Turkey Point Plant.

We requested that the response to Item 2.2.2 be provided within 60 days and Item 4.5.3 within 90 days.

The 90 day schedule will start when the staff completes its review of the referenced WCAP and Supplement.

The review is expected to be completed shortly.

Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience this error may have caused.

We have discussed the details of the RAI with your staff and the schedule for response should not be affected.

Sincerely, Q~

Daniel G. McDonal, roject Manag.r Operating Reactors Branch Pl Division of Licensing

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/enclosure:

See next page

J.

W. Williams, Jr.

F/orida Power and Light Company Turkey Point Plants Units 3 and 4

cc:

Harold F. Reis, Esquire Newman and Holtzinger, P.C.

1615 L Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20036 Mr. Jack Shreve Office of the Public Counsel Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Norman A. Coll, Esquire

Steel, Hector and Davis 4000 Southeast Financial Center Miami, Fl orida 33131-2398 Mr.

Ken N. Harris, Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power and Light Company P.O.

Box 029100 Miami, Flori da 33102 Mr. M. R. Stierheim County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County Miami, Florida 33130 Resident Inspector Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Coomission Post Office Box 57-1185 Miami, Florida 33257-1185 Mr. Allan Schubert, Manager Public Health Physicist Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Blvd.

Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Intergovernmental Coordination and Review Office of Planning A Budget Executive Office of the Governor The Capitol Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Adminis tra tor Department of Environmental Regulation Power Plant Siting Section State of Florida 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Dr. J.

Nelson Grace Regional Administrator, Region II U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 2900 101 Marietta Street

Atlanta, GA 30303 Martin H. Hodder, Esquire 1131 N.E. 86th Street Miami, Florida 33138 Joette Lorion 7269 SW 54 Avenue Miami, Florida 33143 Mr. Chris J. Baker, Plant Manager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant F'lorida Power and Light Company P.O.

Box 029100 Miami, Florida 33102 Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs The Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32304

I

~

~

~

ENCLOSURE Re vest for Additional Information Turke Point Plant Units 3 and 4

Item 2.2.2 - Incomplete The licensee's response is based on the NUTAC report.

The licensee needs to present his evaluation of the NUTAC program and describe how it will be implemented at Turkey Point 3 and 4.

The staff found that the NUTAC program fails to address the concern about establishing and maintaining an interface between all safety-related equipment vendors and the utility.

Accordingly, the licensee will need to supplement his response to address this concern.

This additional information should describe how current procedures will be modified and new ones initiated to meet the elements of this concern.

Item 4.5.3 - Incomplete I

The licensee's response to this item references WCAP 10271, "Evaluation of Surveillance Frequencies and Out of Service Times for the Reactor Protection Instrumentation System" and Supplement 1 which is an extension of the evaluation and provides a discussion of component wearout caused by testing.

The licensee's response needs to be supplemented with details of plant specific implementation for Turkey Point 3 and 4.