ML17345A731
| ML17345A731 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 06/12/1989 |
| From: | Edison G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Woody C FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17345A732 | List: |
| References | |
| GL-83-28, TAC-54036, TAC-54037, NUDOCS 8906190216 | |
| Download: ML17345A731 (10) | |
Text
gp,8 RKgy
~C Wp
+
0 C
I~ I
+i~
/p
~O
++**+
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 June 12, 1989 Docket Nos.
50-250 and 50-251 Hr. C. 0. Woody, Acting Senior Vice President-Nuclear Nuclear Energy Department Florida Power and Light Company P.O.
Box 14000 Juno, Beach, Florida 33408-0420
Dear Nr. Wooay:
SUBJECT:
TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 AND 4 - SAFETY EVALUATIONS FOR GENERIC LETTER 83-28, ITEMS 4.5.2 AND 4.5.3,,
REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TESTING'TAC NGS.
54036 AND 54037)
The purpose of this letter is to transmit our Safety Evaluations (SE) for the subject issues and to inform you that we now consider this matter closed.
Items 4.5.2 and 4.5.3 derive from Generic Letter (GL) 83-28, which was issued by the NRC staff on July 8, 1983.
GL 83-28 indicated actions to be taken by applicants and licensees based on the generic aspects.of the Salem Anticipated Transient Without Scram event.
Item 4.5 of GL 83-28 contained a staff position which required on-line functional testing of the Reactor Trip System (RTS),
including independent testing of the diverse trip features of the reactor trip breakers.
Item 4.5.2 required each 1'icensee to confirm that his plant is designed to permit periodic on-line testing of the RTS and, if not, to justify not making modifications to permit such testing.
Item 4.5.3 required each licensee to confirm that periodic on-line functional testing of the RTS is being performed.
These items were combined as Nultiple Plant Action B-93.
By letter dated November 8, 1983, you responded to Item 4.5.2.
Furthermore, the Westinghouse Owners Group responded to Item 4.5.3 for all Westinghouse plants in a report (WCAP-10271, January 1983) followed by supplemeIIts in 1983 and 1986 (see references in the enclosed Technical Evaluation Report dated March 1989).
The NRC staff, with the assistance of our contractor, EG8G, Idaho, reviewed the responses to these items for: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4.
EG&G found your responses to these items'or Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 to be acceptable, and the NRC staff concurs with the contractor's findings.
Enclosure 1 is the SE for Item 4.5.2.
Enclosure 2 is the SE for Item 4.5.3.
8906i902i6 8906i2 PDC PDR ADOCK 05000250 3P~!
) I II y
I
I t~,
~
~'r.
C. 0. lloody June 12, 1989 The EG&G Technical Evaluation Reports, dated January 9,
1987 (Item 4.5.2, Enclosure
- 3) and March 1989 (Item 4.5.3, Enclosure'4),
are also enclosed.
Therefore, we consider Items 4.5.2 and 4.5.3 and Multiple Plant Action, B-93 closed for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4.
By this action we are closing TAC Nos.
54036 and 54037.
4 Sincerely,'
Original'igged by
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/enclosures:
See next page
=Gordon E. Edison, Sr. Project Manager Project Directorate II-2 Division of Reactor Projects-I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION Doc et e
RC 5 LPDRs PD22 Rdg File S. Varga, 14/E/4 G. Lainas, 14/H/3 H. Berkow D. Miller G. Edison G. llunder OGC E. Jordan, MNBB 3302 B. Grimes, 9/A/2 ACRS(10)
B. Mozafari, 14/B/20 M. Sinkule, RII SER FOR GL 83-28/TP 54036/37]
I-2 PE:
P. '2 PM:PDI I-2 D'
2 GH 6r GEdison/jd H r o 0
y 89 06/i/g/89 06/i+89 6/
89
N Ewe~i~la e
1 g h u
J H
F ll d
I Il
Jl S
s Mr. C. 0.
Woody
. ~ June 12,'989 The EG&G Technical Evaluation Reports, dated January 9, 1987 (Item 4.5.2, Enclosure
- 3) and March 1989 (Item 4.5.3, Enclosure 4), are also enclosed.
Therefore, we consider Items 4.5.2 and 4.5.3 and Multiple Plant Action B-93 closed for Turkeyi.Point Units 3 and 4.
By this action we are closing TAC Nos.
54036 and 54037.
S incere ly, Original signed by
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/enclosures:
See next page Gordon E. Edison, Sr. Project Manager Pr oject Directorate II-2 Division of Reactor Projects-I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTR I BUTION m77l NRC 8
LPDRs PD22 Rdg File S.
Varga, 14/E/4 G. Lainas, 14/H/3 H. Berkow D. Miller G. Edison
. G.
Wunder CGC E. Jordan, MNBB 3302 B. Grimes, 9/A/2 ACRS(10)
B. Mozafari, 14/B/20 M. Sinkule, RII
[SER FOR GL 83-28/TP 54036/37]
I-2 PE: P
-2 PM: PD II-2, D': P
$2 GW er GEdisoo/jd Qp HBqr o 0
y 89 06/t'/89 06/(+89 q '46/ )
9
I
/
'1
)
I
e a
Mr. C. 0.
Woody Florida Power and Light Company Turkey Point Plant CC:
Harold F. Reis, Esquire Newman and Holtzinger, P.C.
1615 L Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036 Mr. Jack Shreve Office of the Public Counsel Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 John T. Butler, Esquire
- Steel, Hector and Davis 4000 Southeast Financial Center Miami, F lor ida 33131-2398 Mr. K. N. Harris, Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant F 1 or ida Power and Light Company P.O.
Box 029100 Miami, Florida 33102 County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County 111 NW 1st Street, 29th Floor Miami, Florida 33128 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station Post Office Box 57-1185 Miami, Florida 33257-1185 Mr. Jacob Daniel Nash Office of Radiation Control Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1317 Winewood Blvd.
Ta1 1ahassee, Florida 32399-.0700 Intergovernmental Coordination and Review Office of Planning 5 Budget Executive Office of the Governor The Capitol Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Administrator Department of Environmental Regu'lation Power Plant Siting Section State of Florida 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 2900 101 Marietta Street Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs The Capitol Ta 1 1 ahas see, F1ori da 32304 P lant Manager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power and Light Company P.O.
Box 029100 Miami, Florida 33102
I
~
~
r.
C. 0.
Moody June 12, 1989 The EG&G Technical Evaluation Reports, dated January 9, 1987 (Item 4.5.2, Enclosure
- 3) and March 1989 (Item 4.5.3, Enclosure 4), are also enclosed.
Therefore, we consider Items 4.5.2 and 4.5.3 and Multiple Plant Action B-93 closed for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4.
By this action we are closing TAC Nos.
54036 and 54037.
Sincerely, Enclosur es:
As stated Gordon E. Edison, Sr. Project Manager Project Directorate II-2 Division of Reactor Projects-I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation'c w/enclosures:
See next page
s'f
(