ML17309A865
| ML17309A865 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 12/09/1996 |
| From: | Julian C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Plunkett T FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9612240164 | |
| Download: ML17309A865 (55) | |
Text
CATEGORY 2 REGULATO INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION EM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:9612240164 DOC.DATE: 96/12/09 NOTARIZED: NO FACIL:50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power
& Light Co.
50-389 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 2, Florida Power
& Light Co.
AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION JULIAN,C.A.
Region 2 (Post 820201)
RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION PLUNKETT,T.F.
Florida Power
& Light Co.
DOCKET g
05000335 05000389
SUBJECT:
Discusses 961112 meeting at NRC Region II Office in Atlanta, GA.Purpose of meeting was to discuss status of FPL St Lucie plant. List of attendees
& copy of FPL handout encl.
REDISTRIBUTION CODE:
IE45D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:
TITLE: Summary of Significant Meeting with Licensee (Part 50)
NOTES RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-3 PD INTERNAL: DEDRO NRR/DISP/PIPB RES/DET/EIB EXTERNAL: NOAC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME WIENSiL.
LE CENTE OGC/ROED RGN2 FILE 01 NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 0
D 0
E NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD)
ON EXTENSION 415-2083 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 10 ENCL 10
December 9, 1996 Florida Power and Light Company ATTN:
Mr. T. F. Plunkett President
- Nuclear Division P. 0.
Box 14000 Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
- PLANT STATUS ST.
LUCIE 1 AND 2 -
DOCKET NOS. 50-335 AND 50-389
Dear Mr. Plunkett:
This refers to the meeting conducted at the NRC Region II Office in Atlanta, Georgia on November 12, 1996.
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the status of your plant.
It is our opinion, that this meeting was very beneficial.
Enclosed is a list of attendees and a copy of the Florida Power and Light Company Handout.
The discussions included the following topics:
Plant Operations, Maintenance, Engineering, and Plant Support.
In accordance with Section 2.790 ot NRC's "Rules of Practice.
"Part 2.
Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me at (404) 331-5526.
Sincerely, Orig signed by Caudle A. Julian Caudle A. Julian, Acting Chief Reactor Projects Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-335, 50-389 License Nos.
Enclosures:
1.
List of Attendees 2.
FP8L Handout cc w/encls:
J.
A. Stall, Site Vice President St. Lucie Nuclear Plant P. 0.
Box 128 Ft. Pierce, FL 34954-0128 cc w/encls:
Continued see page 2
9b12240l64 961209 PDR ADOCK 05000335 8
PDR OFFICIAL COPY
FPLL cc w/encls:
Continued H.
N. Paduano, Manager Licensing and Special Programs Florida Power and Light Company P. 0.
Box 14000 Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 J. Scarola Plant General Manager St. Lucie Nuclear Plant P. 0.
Box 128 Ft. Pierce, FL 34954-0128 E. J.
Weinkam Plant Licensing Manager St. Lucie Nuclear Plant P. 0.
Box 128 Ft. Pierce.
FL 34954-0218 M. S.
- Ross, Attorney Florida Power 8 Light 11770 US Highway 1
North Palm Beach, FL 33408 John T. Butler.
Esq.
- Steel, Hector and Davis 4000 Southeast Financial Center
- Miami, FL 33131-2398 Bill Passetti Office of Radiation Control Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1317 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-0700 Joe Myers, Director Division of Emergency Preparedness Department of Community Affairs 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Thomas R. L. Kindred County Administrator St. Lucie County 2300'irginia Avenue Ft. Pierce.
FL 34982
FP8L Distribution w/encls:
K. Landis, RII L. Wiens, NRR B. Crowley. RII G. Hopper, RII PUBLIC NRC Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
7585 South Highway A1A Jensen
- Beach, FL 34957-2010 5 I6NATURE NANE SN DATE 12
/ 96 12 /
/ 96 YES NO COPY?
YES hO 12 /
/ 96 YES hO 12 /
/ 96 YES NO 12 /
/ 96 YES hO 12 /
/ 96 YES NO
~
0
~
~
I
~
0
~ ~ ~
ST. LUCIE PLANT STATUS AGENDA Introduction Operations Maintenance Engineering Plant Support J.A, Stall J. Scarola J. Marchese D.J. Denver D.L. Fadden QualityAssurance Summary L.W. Bladow J.A. Stall INTRODUCTION 1-2
ST. LUGIE PLANT OBJECTIVES
~ improve industrial Safety a
Eliminate Backlogs
~ Improve Outage Performance
~ Improve Regulatory Performance
~ Improve Budgetary Performance ST. LUCIE PLANT ORGANIZATION Wh WhOP O OO I
I I ~
II OP Il
~~h lOWIW I
~ ~ PCP CCOWOP lh OO
~\\ IOICW
'I hhhOOIOl V
hh P
I
$ I OPIIhlPW
~
Phh OWPOO OPO'I
OPERATIONS ST. LUCIE PLANT OPERATIONS QPg4TCHS AMIIAGER OtKMSTRY SNPS INISOR HEALTHPHVSCS SJPERIRSOR OPS RATSHIS SUPSRNSOR OPSRATRHIS SI PPORT SLIPSRNSOR 5-6
OPERATIONS
~
No Automatic Trips
- Control of Maintenance Activities
- Reliable Equipment Performance
- Operators Attentive to Their Instrumentation a
Unit AvailabilityImproved
- Best Performance Since 1993
- Improved Predictability of Unit Performance
~
Conservative Operating Decisions
- Steam Generator Inspection/Plugging
- Exit Reduced Inventory for Storm Preparation
- Auxiliary Feedwater Piping Modification OPERATIONS CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS - STRENGTHS
~
Leadership - Set Station Standards
- Equipment Performance - PWOs and CRs
- LCO Time Minimized
- OWAs Resolved
- Control Systems Operating in Automatic
-: Professionalism - 3 Way Communication
~
Expectations Clearly Communicated
- Revision to Conduct of Operations Procedure
- Monthly Shift Supervisor Meetings
- NPS Participation in Daily Management Brief
- Weekly Senior Management Requalification Meeting
- Accountability Reinforced 7-8
OPERATIONS CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS - STRENGTHS
~
Shift Turnovers Improved
- Joint Crew Shift Briefs
- Logs Standardized and Reinforced
- Improved Shift Plan Through POD
~
Improved Risk Assessment Capability
- Shutdown Risk Assessed Shiftly
- LCO Maintenance Execution
- PSA Tools Implemented in Daily Plan Week Rolling Schedule OPERATIONS CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS - STRENGTHS a
Attention to Detail
- Control Board Awareness
- Annunciators Maintained as Blackboard
- Data Loggers - Used for Trending
- Housekeeping Standards
~
Adherence to Procedures
- Stop and Fix Before Proceeding
- High Number of Procedure Changes
- Upgraded Mode Transition Procedures
- Improved Procedural Detail 9-10
OPERATIONS CHALLENGES
~
Ensuring Adequate Depth in Staff
- Added 12 Operators August 1995
- Adding 8 Operators November 1996
- 6 STAIShift Supervisors in SRO Training
- Recruiting 3 Experienced SROs
~
Operation Consistent with UFSAR
- 2 SROs Dedicated to UFSAR Team
- Procedure Review Process Has Been Strengthened
~
Work Control Processes
- Clearance Procedure
- Equipment Status Tracking
Procedure Detail and Quality OPERATIONS SELF ASSESSMENT a
Significant Condition Report Briefs x
Crew Critiques of Plant Events
~
Post Evolution Critique a
Support From Outside St. Lucie Plant forAssessment a
Real Time Training Coach 11-12
OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE TRENDS
~
Equivalent Availability-Improved a
Automatic Reactor Trips - Improved
~
Challenges to Operations - Improved
~
Operator Work Arounds - Improved a
Log Readings Out-of-Spec - Improved OPERATIONS EQUIVALENTAVAILABILITY 7e 13-14
OPERATIONS AUTOMATICREACTOR TRIPS o) 6--
5 0
4 E
3 z
2 0
0 1993 1994 Year 1995 0
1996 OPERATIONS CHALLENGES TO OPERATIONS 7
m 6
PLc 5
O0 4
0 3
E 2
z 1
0 1st QTR 2nd QTR 1996 3rd QTR 4th QTR 15-1 6
OPERATIONS OPERATOR WORK AROUNDS 60 Co 50 -.
0 4
o 30 E 20-Z 10 0
55 43 36 12 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct 1996 OPERATIONS 14 12 10 LOG READINGS OUT-OF-SPEC 6.5 Z
4 4.5 0
1.5 1996 17-18
MAINTENANCE ST. LUGIE PLANT MAINTENANCE
~LCCSIICLL IawiTCNwtt ONCIINSOS ISO
~NNOOwrtt SVSCSVSOS AQ. SLOE NOIIIIwwtt 555NSC 5 SOSCNNSOA ILSstocrrc
~ ILsoAArroort WLYSS 5 NCIDLC NNOOLNICC
~VICSNSOA SOSSraa COW, INIIIOIOICC SLNCSWOS 0 C. CNOISN I,IL54lltl A SOCNCL 5 C SALOr 5 OTICt55 5 OCCLC I LSSOC 19-20
MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE AND MATERIALCONDITION-STRENGTHS
~
Resolved Long-Standing Equipment Problems
- Unit 1 Pressurizer Code Safety Valves
- Containment Spray Flow Control Valves
- Nuclear Instrumentation
~
Focused Attention on Maintenance Support of Plant Operations
- Trouble and Breakdown Work Order Backlog
- Control Room Instruments Out-Of-Service
- Reduced Primary and Secondary Leaks
- Reduced Aged Plant Work Orders
- Implemented Minor Maintenance Program - "WORK IT NOW" (WIN)
MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE AND MATERIALCONDITION-STRENGTHS
~
Significantly Improved Plant Housekeeping and Material Condition
- Plant Material Condition Walkdowns by Designated Personnel
- Insulation, Coatings, and Scaffolding Surveillance Programs Established
- Model ln-Process Work Areas Identified and Photographed for Emulation
~
Maintenance Programs and Processes Implemented
- Welding Process
- Relief Valves
- Predictive Maintenance 21-22
MAINTENANCE CONDUCT OF MAINTENANCE-STRENGTHS
~
On-Shift Maintenance Managers
~
Quarterly Maintenance Self Assessments Focusing on Quality of Work MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE AND MATERIALCONDITION-CHALLENGES a
Equipment Problems Remaining to be Resolved
- Unit 1 Rod Control System Reliability
- Unit 1 Charging Pumps
- Unit 2 Pressurizer Code Safety Valves
~
Maintenance Rule a(1) Equipment/System
- Unit 1 Power Operated Relief Valves (PORVs)
- 1B Emergency Diesel Generator
- Emergency Diesel Generator Governors
- 4160 Volt Breakers
- Unit 1 "C" Auxiliary Feedwater Train
- Reactor Coolant Pump Seals 23-24
MAINTENANCE CONDUCT OF MAINTENANCE-CHALLENGES
~
Personnel Safety a
Procedures Upgrade
~
Procedural Compliance
~
M&TEProgram a
Hot Tool Control MAlNTENANCE TROUBLE & BREAKDOWNWORK ORDER BACKLOG 900 vI I
a d00 700 II d00 d
~ 900,
~ ~" ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~.
I I
I 200 I
100 0
I ~
0
~ v
~
v
~
~
Svp (kl HOv OCC ~
FtO Mdv ACN Mly Wn Al Avd SM OC'I
'M ONc 25-26
MAINTENANCE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE 60 60
~Oute00
~N00 Outeoo
~Totet I 'T 20 20 6
70
~
~
pel 0 uill~
Ntl Ouil
~
ioos iree 2roe srot
~ roe sroe eros Tree
~ roe ioroe terse
~ 2roe 7
7 7
7 7
7
~ 0 10 10 21 20 20 24 17 5 ~
~
~ 4 24 20 24 27 27 22 24 11 MAINTENANCE ACTIVEPRIMARYAND SECONDARY LEAKS tsi IS 10 I
IOI Iht Sts ltl ttl
~ti Ttt
~tr tll IOII Iset I
ITlat I
Tl I
TI I
Il I~
'Il
~I I
Il
~I
~I I
ouTIOI I
I It II, II
~1 TOTll 74 Il
~l I
II I~
~ ~
IS I
I 27-28
MAINTENANCE PWO AGING
~ 04
~acavtI O
0 OIL Too
~"
boa aatIS Cwtt aatt4 tt wt w 40 ottat ~ II P
Soo
~to as 504 400 CS.
Iao tSL TOTSL5 I
Sot
~ W I
~
0 Wt. 5 tI IA twt,at wu
~ 5 II~. ~ W
~
~
LIQ 4 ~
~ I
~IT
~ ~
~ TI
~ 5 5 ~
~ 0 ~
MAINTENANCE INSULATIONDEFICIENCIES 250 200 050 50 tSL
~IkI'tt 5 t.to I.~ 0 ttt 'IL 5
~ ~ 5 0 II II~
0 5 0
~ OL 0 5 ~ ICIlt0 Il5
~ OI Ita
~ ~ 5
~ 00 0 ~
LT 55 29-30
MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL SAFETY PWOS 50 15 0
10
~SL
~WOa Ittl I ~\\I S Ittl Ittl I lt1$
S IOS S
SOS SJI ~
IIIS
$00
~ LN 105
~OS 000 1005 I IIN Itt~
5 I
t I tt I tl tl S
~
~
tt Sl to tt II MAINTENANCE OPEN FIRE PROTECTION IMPAIRMENTS
~0 j
g tt 0
10
~ SL loll I Itlt I ISIS lillI ISIS I II~.
tIIL ISIS I/Ih 5 ~
415 th
~ 14, SW IIW, II&
ISIO'I
~. OSIS' I
lt I tl tl IS
~I
~ I St Sl SS 51 to tl 31-32
i <Q
[lp gpss R'4LRQiS
~
c'
~ '
~
~
~
RshLLA
%44'R
%ahh&R 'NLRB
,S
~
Responsive to Plant Operations
- System Engineering Group Expanded From 6 to 22 System Engineers and 8 Component Engineers
- Fosters Better Accountability
- Key Player Supporting 13-Week Maintenance Schedules
- Maintenance Rule System Owner
- Lead Role in Event Response Teams
- Modifications Address Equipment Problems a
64 Major and Over 250 Minor Modifications From August 1995 to Present ENGINEERING
~
Equipment Problem Successes
- Pressurizer Code Safety Valves
- Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) Relay Sockets
- Reactor Vessel 0-Ring
- Safety-Related Relief Valves
- Containment Spray Flow Control Valves 35-36
ENGINEERING a
Planned Improvements During 1997 Unit 1 Unit 2
- Steam Generator Replacement
- Thermo-Lag
- Rod Control System Upgrade
- EDG Governor
- Steam Generator Wide Range Level Instrumentation
- EDG Relay Sockets
- Thermo-Lag Pressurizer Safety Valves
- EDG Governor Reactor Vessel 0-Ring
- Containment Sump Level ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT
~
Follow Through on Self Assessment Activities
- Design and Change Control Process
- Design and Verification
- Implementation
- Affected Document Change
- UFSAR Review
- Ensure Consistency Between Procedures and UFSAR 37-38
ENGINEERING PERFORMANCE TRENDS
~
Open Modification Packages - Improving
~
Temporary System Alterations - Improving
~
Safety System Performance
- High Pressure Safety Injection (HPSI) - Improving
- Auxiliary Feedwater - Improving
- Emergency Diesel Generator - Improving
. ENGINEERING OPEN MODIFICATIONPACKAGES IS?
~ SL II14 2I14
$ ISS SISS SI14
~I14
?ISS SISS SISS 10I94 I II14 12I14 P C IIa
?AS.
$ 24 249
?? ~
21S t1?
$ 0$
$ 0I 22?
t2$
39<0
ENGINEERING TEMPORARY SYSTEM ALTERATIONS i '4 Z
14 tll I
S004 I
IOll SOOS SOOs SOOS tO tl I
SOOS I
SOSS
~0tt tO ta SOOS SOOS
~ S I
~ I I
tl t.
I tl l
l~
tl
~I I~
I 41
ENGINEERING UNIT 1 HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION UNAVAILABILITYHOURS
.r' OIO 0IV aV asV 0>V 0>%
01%
01%
0>%
0>%
01%
C0%
~eaa
~%l>V akllaa
~%>laa Sl Sl 191 9C Sa'>I 195>
Sa so 9'
saa SL 1
I uslc I
-..m 2s29 am scso cssSC am iso 8110 am am asm am a
LSoc.
I asm am am 22ss cLSL>
cia>
am sLSL am am am am a
lASLCC I
sm 2125 WSS SLCS LSLm 16C>S 1845 LSLSL SLm
$18)
LCLla
>2CO csm csm csm a.m mm LSLm Lslm ~9 1L1m 812>
8121 am a
ENGINEERING UNIT 2 HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION UNAVAILABILITYHOURS r'
y
~
Caa aCL eV aV 0>V 0>V e%
a%
C9%
0>%
e%
a%
a%
Sl Sl
) 9a
>9a 9>I I
I 8L am six a
2am am 2
CLOL am am a
xm la aco am sl mm am am am lm 1
asm 9Sm 12&
v Sl SL19 San&i'lCO 6>M a987 4L:Xl CLD LCO 17 C>SO SLSsI 4>Z
?Zilch 13LSO SO&i 13SKi 8')
8L20 8LZL
%OS Cm 2
42-43
ENGINEERING UNIT 1 AUXILIARYFEEDWATER UNAVAILABILITYHOURS Iiio>>tioti>>OT
~ ~
~i 4+
JAolw IO CO>>
a>>
Ote aOI OOI CO>>
COS a>>
COS a>>
CIO aO, COS
~ >>
tc I
I Oo 5,
Ol 9II Imt 9r 50 195t TOO I
I a
Qoo IBAIW I 57 50 750 OOI OLOI IO ICAIW I 4&rS 21co LL>>>>
7050 4&50 IAAIW I aoo Loo
&Co 3600 Lloo IBATW I 7
6'co
&Im 06274 Ol i ooo am Qco 920 oco 950 am 0
aloo TTM
&Co 2L30 3120 9150 Taco 21 42oo 37ccl Tm am am ooo am 0
4321 419 IQCO 920 920 L&io I&'0 9
'CATW I
4&22
&7. 8 6150 I&1m 161754 216 i>>
21207t IIIAII 11540
&LCO ocotl 86co oli ENGINEERING UNIT2 AUXILIARYFEEDWATER UNAVAILABILITYHOURS
. ~ ~'44>>tSII 44&TiOt
'4
~ i
,,4,
4'o>>
oo>>
als als cos oooo OI>>
a>>
cos Ots OI>>
ols cos
~ceo I
I Im i9'i Rf W
191 am 1&co a
750 am L7 am
&50 a
am am a
am am a
1&70 am a
077o am am am a
am a
Bc&0 3120 5010
&LCO oc Olm
'IJ2'i 5.
w70 a
3750 a
TL70 14 70 14 2I 750 co Tcm 21m 17 11oo 1 co a
am 7350 T&5o ri.m rm 350
&m a
9150 1li2&
1&750 22750 2OLm 9Xt25t ri799 TOL2tt 13&49 114LTI Tri~
TI970 2
ENGINEERING UNIT 1 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITYHOURS ICOCO I COCO r
~
Irr4 744117'.
COCOj COCO ~
I
~ ~ 4 i
~1ACCO
~IOKOO I ~ ~
~ IACCO Ol OI COII COOI OIII 0144
~I ~ r4 OOOI OIIO 019 OIO COOr ~ 13 400 194 I
191 94
~
94 IIO 'OO I
CO 95i
~
I I
196 96 IBEDG 1360 IAEDG 67 80 IB EDG I
4060 12 I~ OO I
00 00 I
I I
Ei
&too I
33.00 75 10 I
1830 Ili50
&COO '8750 SI30 I
6&30 r940 4900 3650 6150
~
5740 22050 I
33150 30!LOO I
I&LAO 57CO '090 3001 I
1980 5010 4010 7S.IO I
4830
~
4&50
&Lao 78750 33150 33450 31CLICI I 16&40 ENGINEERING UNIT2 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITYHOURS IJ,"
OCO OIIO Ol OI 0141 OIOI 0441 OlII 01II 039r OIIO 01 44
~arrl IM 7101rrAr
~IA
~
~
~ IA 2550 4650 41 25 1&00 4325
~ OO 25 00 6325 1(D ~
14'I CO1 I35.
28 EDG 8022 74 228722 IOQ751 I
)9 '
IL.rS SOO 2001 000
&Oar 600
&00 3&50 C.oo
&Ice aoo aoo 2&io o
ISICOI llaaC 667 4&i 1300 1400
~&M IEIEI 27.70 2&70 35.
46-47
PLANT SUPPORT SERVICES IIKVKl.'Il4VKAAK I) I,IhBIIIII I
IMVWICaeVVMKVKIK 1111 KVIVIIK I MMKI 1AM)IIIflJN IIIv IVMXVIUIW I'.I, WKIKA litIYN~ W Q KVKIJl MIIXVrvW KI'kVWvlII MKIJVIIYSIIVKVIVW llWMIIIMMlhl1K W II VVIIIII, M
@Ill'8-49
TRAININGDEPARTMENT STRENGTHS a
implemented Real Time Training Coaches
~
Conducted Basics of Supervision {BOS) Class for Plant Supervisors
~
Developing a Method to Determine/Display Training Effectiveness
~
Enhanced Management Observations ofTraining Classes
~
Developed a Group to Review Changes and Perform Internal Audits
~
Departmental Training Plans
~
Dynamic Learning Activity{DLA)Hands-on Training TRAININGDEPARTMENT CHALLENGES a
Backlog ofTraining Material a
Accreditation Renewal for Operations Programs with Two Outages a
RO Initialand SRO Upgrade Classes Concurrent with Two Outages PERFORMANCE TRENDS a
Open Simulator Issues - Improved a
Management Observations - Improved a
Training Attendance - Improved 50-51
TRAININGDEPARTMENT OPEN SIMULATORISSUES (With Certification/Training Impact)
I I
I ~
~
~ I s~l i~ I TRAININGDEPARTMENT MANAGEMENTOBSERVATIONS l
I C8 ts 0
'A CA \\ 1EA
'0%
t%
JO lOO KOt 52-53
TRAININGDEPARTMENT TRAININGATTENDANCE g KO%
K f
WN Ill% 'tlO "NN 1W 0% I St<
5% ~
S%
0%
W%
0$'II *IVY I
I~
I OP 4t tf Oil I~
~
~
54
HEALTH PHYSICS DEPARTMENT STRENGTHS
~
Reduced Radioactive Material Stored On-Site
- Shipped Approximately 5,000 Cubic Feet Dry Active Waste
- Shipped Approximateiy 1,200 Cubic Feet Blowdown Resin to Waste Processor
~
ALARAReview Board Modification Includes Key Managers with the Plant General Manager as Chairman
- Established an Annual Man-Rem Budget for Each Plant Department
- Top 10 ALARAProjects a
Maintenance Preparing Reactor 0-Ring Surface Underwater Reduced Exposure by a Factor of 100 HEALTH PHYSICS DEPARTMENT CHALLENGES a
Reduce Radioactive Material Generated
- Use of Dissolvable Protective Clothing
~
Unit 1 RCB Atmosphere Monitor Problems
- Strengthened the Sampling Procedure
- Increased Personal Accountability
- Procedure Compliance
~
Reduce Personnel Contaminations
~
Reduced Target of Contaminated Areas in Plant from 2,000 Square Feet to 200 Square Feet 55-56
HEALTH PHYSICS DEPARTMENT PERFORMANGETRENDS e
Contaminated Floor Space-'improved Radioactive Exposure - Improved Rate 57
HEALTH PHYSlCS DEPARTMENT CONTAMINATEDFLOOR SPACE
'WLWI '0 SWI WW WW IWI IltW ODI >DW '000 WW DW ~
WW 'DW DW4 IDW lWL 'IOW
~I>0
~IID II
~
>I IS I
KO I 5(0 tlt S>0 HEALTH PHYSlCS DEPARTMENT RADIATIONEXPOSURE 1991 THRU Y-T-D 1996 0
SIWW WS
~
SW I LWI WW IWI IWS WW 'tW I>W DW 'W DW
>Oil
>000 t>W 'O 0 >OW WW IVW ISW
'IOLWSW LSID tIIS SSS ~ IDI'll~Ill~
SO I 00 IllI tl~ IWI Stl ~
SISS
'SII ~
SWS WIS 58-59
Corrective Actions in progress for improvement:
- Dedicated Facilities (TSC/OSC)
- Upgraded Training from "Read and Sign" to Classroom
- Implemented Duty Roster for ERO Staffing
- Implemented Control Room Communicator Position to Assist with Off-site Notifications and Staff Augmentation
- Upgraded Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures
- Increased DrillFrequency
~
Revised Severe Weather Procedure
~
Hurricane Season Preparation Procedure Further Refined (3/97)
~
Hurricane Procedure to be Exercised Prior to Hurricane Season 1997
~
Implemented New State Telephone System (ESAT COM)
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS CHALLENGES
~ Correcting Identified Weaknesses
- Training
- DrillFrequency
~
Conducting an Integrated Emergency Plan Drill
~
Conducting a Site Evacuation Drill 60-61
SECURITY DEPARTMENT
~
Tampering Event Actions
- Standdown Meetings Held with Plant Personnel Informing Them of the Tampering Event
- Random Security Patrol Frequency Increased in Vital Areas of the Plant
- Historicai Review Performed to Identify Any Potential Additional Instances ofTampering
- Vital Area Access/Reduced the Number of Personnel with Access
- Inspections for Tampering Have Been Incorporated into Plant Material Inspection Activities
- System Engineering Walkdowns Include Inspections for Tampering
- Remote Shutdown Rooms Have Been Locked with "Break Away" Locks
- Security Surveillance Equipment Installed Throughout the Plant SECURITY DEPARTMENT
~
Strong Operational Assessment
- Valve line-up verification
- Surveillance of stand-by equipment
- Site-wide Inspections
- Standardized response by procedure development 62-63
SECURlTY DEPARTMENT CHALLENGES
~
Effectively Processing Personnel for Outages a
Improve Reliability ofTwo Microwave Stations
~
Manage Fitness For Duty Program 64
PROCEDURE UPGRADE AND MAINTENANCE
~
Centralized Procedures Development Group (One Supervisor and Five Operations, Five Maintenance)
~
Low Number of Procedures with Temporary Changes
~
Matching Writer with Worker for Development Time
~
Upgraded Unit 1 Procedures
- Turbine Start-Up
- Reactor Start-Up
- Turbine Shut Down
- Reactor Shut Down
- Reactor Coolant System Cooldown
- Reactor Coolant System Heat Up PROCEDURE UPGRADE AND MAINTENANCE
~
Annunciator Procedures Upgrade Program
- Unit 1 A and B Panels Written
- Unit 2 A and B Panels in Process a
Evaluating and Benchmarking Upgrade Process in Industry
- On-line Procedures
~
- First Time Procedure Use
- Level of Usage 65-66
PROCEDURE UPGRADE AND MAlNTENANCE CHALLENGES
~
Timely Technical Reviews
~
Managing Backlog - Procedure Maintenance vs.
Procedure Upgrade
~
Incorporating Technology PERFORMANCETRENDS a Procedures with Temporary Changes PROCEDURE UPGRADE AND MAlNTENANCE PROCEDURES WITHTEMPORARY CHANGES 67-68
CORRECTIVE ACTION GROUP
~
Condition Report Event Codes - 2Q/3Q 1996 Non-Equipment Events The most numerous non-equipment event code categories for the last two quarters have been:
- Procedure/Policy, Less Than Adequate
- Procedure/Policy, Adherence
- Procedure/Policy, Work Package Issues
- Engineering Items/Plant Standards, Engineering, Specifications, Documents
- Planning/Scheduling/Support
- Engineering Items/Plant Standards, Design CORRECTIVE ACTION GROUP
~
Equipment Events The most numerous equipment event code categories for the last two quarters have been:
- Equipment/System Control, Equipment out of Norm
- Equipment/System Control, Inspection Test Failure
- Degradation/Corrosion/Erosion
- Repeat Failures
- Abnormal Operation (including actuations)
- Component/System Leaks 69-70
CORRECTIVE ACTION GROUP CHALLENGES
~
Establish increasing Standards for Corrective Actions as the Organization Matures
~
Identify Training Needs
~
Improve Root Cause Capabilities On-Site a
Establish a Hierarchy to Effectively Manage Backlog CORRECTIVE ACTION GROUP PERFORMANCE TRENDS a
Self-Identified Condition Reports-Improved a
Condition Reports Initiated By Department-Improved a
Condition Reports Initiated By Quarter - Improved 71-72
CORRECTIVE ACTION GROUP SELF-IDENTIFIED CONDITION REPORTS
[~ssganea 4 4I CA\\
I
~\\ ~
I II4 73
CORRECTIVE ACTION GROUP 1996 YTD CONDITION REPORTS BY INITIATINGDEPARTMENT rrliee
'i +)i F1 010
.'i:~10 115
$/4 M AINT 0IiS OAIOC KIIO SSIIY LIC CORRECTIVE ACTION GROUP 1996 YTD CONDITION REPORTS GENERATED BY QUARTER I
1000 II 000 1 Il I
0 "i,
i' 4
$.(MI
'.'. )
~a
'/elr
+
C le.e.
le a lv~Il
~ ~
~ll lv ll lv %
IV 00 74-75
PERSONNEL INDICATORS PERFORMANCE TRENDS
~
Industrial Safety Accident Rate - Improved PERSONNEL INDICATORS INDUSTRIALSAFETY ACCIDENT RATE (12-MONTH RUNNINGAVERAGE) aoo o
ooo ace R
QUALITYASSURANCE ST. LUCIE PLANTQUALITYASSURANCE SRE OVAUlYASSVANCE MANAGER AVOITSIPERPORMANCE MONflORNO SVPEWOOR
. LCi7iilPiS
~CEP ENOENl lECN MCALREVlfW SVPE RVNOR OYÃfSPRif'VARY CONTROL SVPEWiSORfx 78-79
0
QUALITYASSURANCE DISTRIBUTIONOF QA FINDINGS BY PRIMARYCAUSE
~!a IC S
4$
r Adhdfrrcg ro rraccoures PAigf:
QUALITYASSURANCE DISTRIBUTIONOF QA FINDINGS BY DEPARTMENT/GROUP 12r 1
10!
ro z
6 o
I
~4 6
0 o
i 2
I l
0 r4 C
Fe p
AK Eng Procd CA Ops HP Msint Proc Trna Myra DEPT/GROUP 80-81
QUALITYASSURANCE Results of QA/QC Oversight Activities
~
Corrective Action Program
- Recurring problems are indicative of less than effective corrective actions
- Poor coordination between departments to resolve findings
- Recent improvements in responses to audit findings and response timeliness noted
~
Design Control and Configuration Management
- Inadequate 10 CFR 50.59 screening of Guidelines
- Procedures and the UFSAR were not always updated to reflect design changes and plant modifications QUALITYASSURANCE Results of QA/QC Oversight Activities (cont.)
~
Maintenance Rule
- St. Lucie Plant was slow to implement the Maintenance Rule
- The EDG system was initiallynot placed in 10 CFR 50.65 (a)(1) status as required
- Formal program elements necessary to assess the overall effect on performance of safety functions due to equipment out of service were not implemented as required 82-83
QUALITYASSURANCE Results of QA/QC Oversight Activities (cont.)
~
Procedural Adherence
- Examples of lack of procedure adherence continue to be identified
~
Procedure Quality
- The procedures do not have sufficient detail
- Recent improvements noted in that operators and maintenance personnel are much less tolerant of inadequate procedures QUALITYASSURANCE Results of QA/QC Oversight Activities (cont.)
~
- Numerous instances of non-compliance with FME requirements were noted during the Unit 1 refueling outage
~
Overtime
- Workers and supervisors repeatedly exceeded overtime policy 84-85
QUALITYASSURANCE Results of QAIQC Oversight Activities (cont.)
~
Security Program
- Security force personnel training and performance have historicaliy been strong
- Recent security events are indicative of weaknesses in access control QUALITYASSURANCE
~
QA DEPARTMENTSTRENGTHS
- Aggressive identification of safety/quality issues
- Accurate assessment of plant performance
- Established a balance of performance-based and compliance-based evaluations
- Interaction with Plant Senior Management
~
QA SELF ASSESSMENT ISSUES ADDRESSED IN 1996
- Stagnation of QA personnel within the QA organization
- Timeliness of QA reporting mechanisms
- Maintaining focus on primary accountabilities
- Clarity of communications with the line organization 86-87
QUALlTYASSURANCE Initiatives to Improve QA Performance
~
Organizational Changes
- Allnew Quality Supervisors (two former NRC Resident Inspectors)
- New Technical Reviews and Assessments (TRA) Group provides real-time oversight of plant operations in all four SALP functional areas a
QA/Line Rotation & Transfer Program
- Rotated 2 Quality Supervisors and two auditors into the line organizations
- Rotated an l&Csupervisor and personnel from Operations and Maintenance into QA
~
Replacing the Periodic Performance Audits with Real-Time Surveillance Reports
- Improves timeliness of QA/QC reporting QUALlTYASSURANCE Initiatives to Improve QA Performance a
Safety Focus - Concentrating Resources on Safety Significant Activities
- Improves utilization of QA'resources
~
Daily QA Report to the Site Vice President and Other Managers
- Real-time communication with site and corporate management a
Quarterly Engineered Safety Features (ESF) System Walk Downs
- Comparing ESF systems to drawings, procedures, and the UFSAR 88-89
QUALlTYASSURANCE Overall QA Assessment of Plant Performance
~
Significant numbers of discrepant conditions continue to be identified by both internal and external oversight organizations
~
However, the site is showing an improving trend, as evidenced by the improved operating performance of both units, by improvements in the material condition of the plant, and by an increasing number of site performance indicators trending positively a
QA is cautiously optimistic that recent performance trends indicate that management initiatives are having the desired effect 90