ML17299B009
| ML17299B009 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 02/13/1986 |
| From: | Van Brunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| To: | Knighton G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17299B010 | List: |
| References | |
| ANPP-35041-EEVB, TAC-60706, NUDOCS 8602180060 | |
| Download: ML17299B009 (6) | |
Text
REGULATOR NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION S TEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR: 8602180060 DOC. DATE: 86/02/13 NOTAR1 ZED:
NO DOCKET 0 FACIL:STN-50-529 Palo Verde Nuclear Stat'ioni Unit 2i Arizona Publi 05000529 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION VAN BRUNT> E. E.
Arizona Nuclear Power Prospect (formerly Arizona Public Serv RECIP. NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION KNIGHTONiG. W.
PWR Prospect Directorate 7
SUBJECT:
Application. For amend to License NPF-46'haning Tech Specs to reflect administrative changs 5 addi limitations DISTRIBUTION CODE:
A001D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR ~ ENCL SIZE:
TITLE:
OR Submi tta1:
General Distributi on NOTES: Standardi zed plant.
05000529 REC IP IENT ID CODE/NAME PWR-8 ADTS PWR-8 EB PWR-8 FOB PWR-8 PEICSB INTERNAL: ACRS 09 ELD/HDS3 N
/RRAB G FIL 04 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
0 1
1 1
6 6
1 0
1 1
1 1
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PWR-8 PD7 PD 01 PWR-8 PEICSB LICITRAzE PWR-8 RSB ADM/LFMB NRR/DHFT/TSCB NRR/ORAS RGN5 COPIES LTTR ENCL 5
5 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
0 1
1 1
0 1
1 EXTERNAL: 24X LPDR NSIC 03 05 1
1 1
1 1
1 EGSG BRUSKEi S NRC PDR 02 1
1 1
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 30 ENCL 26
Arizona Nuclear Power Project P.o. BOX 52034
~
PHOENIX, ARIZONA85072-2034 February 13, 1986 ANPP-35041-EEVB/JRP/98.05 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
Mr. George M. Knighton, Project Director PMR Project Directorate 87 Division of Pressurized Water Reactor Licensing B U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission washington, D.C.
20555
Subject:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)
Unit 2 Docket No.
STN 50-529 (License NPF-46)
Change to Technical Specifications for Full Power License File: 86-056-026
Dear Mr. Knighton:
- Attached, please find proposed changes to the Unit 2 Technical Specifications.
These changes have been previously discussed with members of your staff.
Attachment 1
contains changes to the Unit 2 Technical Specifications which are purely administrative
- changes, for example:
a change to achieve consistency throughout the Technical Specifications, correction of an error, or a
change in nomenclature.
Attachment 2 contains other changes to the Unit 2 Technical Specifications which include changes that constitute additional limitations and restrictions or controls not presently included in the Technical Specifications.
Me hereby request that the NRC incorporate these proposed changes into the Unit 2 Technical Specifications at the issuance of a full power license.
In order to expedite any questions or concerns which may arise, we would be pleased to meet with you and your staff concerning the attached changes during the week of February 21, 1986, to ensure a timely review and approval.
If you have any questions, please call.
Very truly yours,
.ssoaisoobo shoals PDR ADOCN 050OOM9 P
PDR EEVB/RAB/rw Attachment E. E.
Van Brunt, Jr.
Executive Vice President Project Director
Mr. George W. Knighton Change to Technical Specifications for Full Power License ANPP-350gl Page 2
cc:
Director, Region V, USNRC NRC Project Manager, E. A. Licitra NRC Resident Inspector, R. P.
Zimmerman
Mr. Georgw W. Knighton Change to Technical Specifications for Full Power License ANPP-35041 Page 3
bcc: J.
R.
Bynum J.
M. Allen M. F. Quinn R. A. Bernier LCTS Coordinator
58602180060" NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION DOCUMENTATION Unit 2 Technical S ecification Index The proposed amendment request does Consideration because:
not involve a
Significant Hazards (A)
The operation of PVNGS Unit 2 in accordance with this change would not:
1)
Involve a
significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or 2)
Create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously analyzed; or 3)
Involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety; and (B)
The proposed amendment is a 'urely administrative change to technical specification.
The Pre-Planned Alternate Sampling Program is not required by the Standard Technical Specification Review Plan.
The design of our high range monitors is consistent with regulatory
- guidance, therefore, no special tech.
spec.
considerations are necessary.
Deletion of the Pre-Planned Alternate Sampling Program from Technical Specifications The need to maintain the Pre-Planned Alternate Sampling Program (PASP) as a
Technical Specification Program is unnecessary.
The PASP has no precedented counterpart in the Standard Technical Specifications.
Notification of deficiencies in the Operability status of High Range and Accident Analysis monitors and system may be achieved by the existing system of Special Report submittals.
Enforcement action may be initiated based on the submittals should efforts of the facility staff to correct these situations be found to be repeatedly inadequate.
The existing Pre-Planned Alternate Sampling Program and other pre-planned contingencies should be maintained by the facility outside the scope of Technical Specification requirements.
Regardless of the deletion of PASP as a Technical Specification
- Program, items I and III on the following table are requested to be deleted for the reasons listed.