ML16295A285

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Safety Sys Functional Insp Repts 50-269/86-16, 50-270/86-16 & 50-287/86-16 on 860505-0611.Weaknesses Identified Re Functionality of Emergency Feedwater Sys
ML16295A285
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/01/1986
From: Taylor J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Tucker H
DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML16161A760 List:
References
TAC-61519, TAC-61520, NUDOCS 8608130041
Download: ML16295A285 (4)


See also: IR 05000269/1986016

Text

~pP REG,,

05

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

~WASHINGTON,

D. C. 20555

August 1, 196

Docket Nos. 50-269,

50-270

and 50-287

Duke Power Company

ATTN:

Mr. H. B. Tucker, Vice President

Nuclear Production Department

422 South Church Street

Charlotte, North Carolina

28242

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

SAFETY SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL INSPECTION REPORT NUMBERS 50-269/86-16,

50-270/86-16, AND 50-287/86-16

This letter forwards the report of the Safety System Functional Inspection

performed by an NRC inspection team over the period May 5 to June 11, 1986,

involving activities authorized by NRC Operating License Numbers DPR-38,

DPR-47, and DPR-55 for the Oconee Nuclear Station. This inspection was

conducted jointly by members of Region II, the Office of Inspection and

Enforcement, and NRC contractors. At the conclusion of the inspection, the

findings were discussed at an exit meeting with you and those members of your

staff identified in the appendix to the enclosed inspection report.

The NRC effort involved an assessment of the operational readiness and

functionality of the emergency feedwater (EFW) system. Particular attention

was directed to the details of modifications and design control, maintenance,

operation, and testing applicable to this system.

This report includes findings that may result in enforcement action, which

would be the subject of subsequent correspondence. The report also addresses

other observations and conclusions made by the inspection team. Section 2

of the report is a summary of the more significant findings. The detailed

findings are presented in Section 3.

The team identified weaknesses regarding the functionality of your EFW system.

These weaknesses included concerns involving the availability of sufficient

water supplies; the ability of the EFW system to function following a seismic

event or a high energy line break; design problems, such as the susceptibility

of EFW pumps to runout and inadequate design of the turbine-driven EFW pump

steam supply; and maintenance problems, such as the use of incorrect greases in

motor-operated valves and repetitive equipment failures. On the other hand,

Oconee was found to have versatile systems for supplying water to steam generators

for post-accident decay heat removal.

This versatility included EFW and main

feed systems with the capability of being cross-connected between the three units

and a separate high pressure feed system with the potential for supplying raw

water to the steam generators of all three units. Notwithstanding this versatil

ity, this inspection identified significant problems to be considered by Duke

PDR

ADOCI4 05000269

'0

PDR

Duke Power Company

- 2

management. These are summarized in Section 2 of the attached report entitled,

"Summary of Significant Inspection Findings."

We request that you respond to

this office within 60 days describing such actions that you have taken or intend to

take in regard to the weaknesses identified in Sections 2.1 and 2.3 of the

enclosed report.

We recognize that you have either already taken or plan to take corrective

actions relating to several of our concerns, including improving the availability

of the condenser hotwell water supply in Units 2 and 3 to the suction of the

motor-driven EFW pumps and improving your capability to perform a controlled

plant cooldown or steam generator depressurization using the main steam atmos

pheric dump valves.

Please include in your response the actions planned and

the schedule for these improvements.

While planning corrective actions based on the weaknesses identified in the

enclosed report, it is important that you realize that the focus of this

inspection was only on the EFW system. Therefore, consideration should be

given to identifying and correcting similar problems in other safety-related

systems.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we would be

pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

Ja es M. Taylo

Director

fice of Inspection and Enforcement

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 50-269/86-16,

50-270/86-16, and 50-287/86-16

Duke Power Company

- 3

cc w/enclosure:

Mr. William L. Porter

Duke Power Company

Duke Power Company

P. 0. Box 33189

422 South Church Street

422 South Church Street

Charlotte, North Carolina 28242

Charlotte, North Carolina 28242

J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.

Mr. Michael S. Tuckman

Bishop, Liberman, Cook, Purcell & Reynolds

Duke Power Company

1200 Seventeenth Street, N.W.

Post Office Box 1439

Washington, D.C. 20036

Seneca, South Carolina 29678

Mr. Robert B. Borsum

Babcock & Wilcox

Nuclear Power Generation Division

Suite 220

7910 Woodmont Avenue

Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Manager, LIS

NUS Corporation

2536 Countryside Boulevard

Clearwater, Florida 33515

Senior Resident Inspector

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Route 2, Box 610

Seneca, South Carolina 29678

Regional Administrator

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

101 Marietta Street, N.W.

Suite 3100

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Mr. Heyward G. Shealy, Chief

Bureau of Radiological Health

South Carolina Department of Health

and Environmental Control

2600 Bull Street

Columbia, South Carolina 29201

Office of Intergovernmental Relations

116 West Jones Street

Raleigh, North Carolina 27603

Honorable James M. Phinney

County Supervisor of Oconee County

lWalhalla,

South Carolina 29621

Duke Power Company

- 4

DISTRIBUTION:

DCS

NRC PDR

Local PDR

ORPB Reading

DI Reading

VStello, EDO.

JMTaylor, IE

HRDenton, NRR

CJHeltemes, AEOD

JGPartlow

RLSpessard

BKGrimes

JAxelrad

ELJordan

TMurley, Region I

JNGrace, Region II

JGKeppler, Region III

RDMartin, Region IV

JBMartin, Region .V

RDWalker, Region II

AFGibson, Region II

VLBrownlee, Region II

O

TPeebles, Region .II

HPastis, NRR

JFStolz, NRR

HRBooher, NRR

All Licensees (Distribution 6P)

NSIC

NTIS

INPO

Regional Division Directors

OFC :IE:OR B

IE: RPB
I
IE:D

I

IE
IE: DI:

NAME :TOMartin

LJCallan
P

K e

RLSpessard
J

rtlow

J Ta lor

DATE :7/7,14/86

7,/86
7Ae'/86
7/q /86

.7/c/86

7/3 Y86