ML16232A167

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Technical Specifications for the Affri Reactor Facility
ML16232A167
Person / Time
Site: Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute
Issue date: 08/05/2016
From: Miller S
US Dept of Defense, Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML16232A177 List:
References
TAC ME1587
Download: ML16232A167 (60)
v • d • e


Text

DRAFT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE

. AFRRI REACTOR FACILITY 5August 2016 LICENSE R-84 DOCKET 50-170

Preface Included in this document are the Technical Specifications and the Bases for the Technical Specifications. These bases, which provide the technical support for the individual Technical Specifications, are included for information purposes only. They are not part of the Technical Specifications, and they do not constitute limitations or requirements to which the licensee must adhere.

i

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE AFRRI REACTOR FACILITY LICENSE NO. R-84 DOCKET 50-170 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0. DEFINITIONS 1.1. ALARA ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Channel ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.3. Channel Calibration ..................................................................................................... 1 1.4. Channel Check ............................................................................................................. 1 1.5. Channel Test ............................................. .-.................................................................. 1 1.6. Confinement ................................................................................................................ 1 1.7. Control Rod ................................................................................................................. 1 1.8. Core Configuration ...................................................................................................... 2 1.9. Core Grid Position ....................................................................................................... 2 1.10. Emergency Stop ........................................................................................................... 2 1.11. Excess Reactivity ......................................................................................................... 2 1.12. Experiment................................................................................................................... 2 1.13. Experimental Facilities ................................................................................................ 2 1.14. Fuel Element ................................................................................................................ 3 1.15. High Flux Safety Channel ........................................................................................... 3 1.16. Initial Startup and Approach to Power ........................................................................ 3 1.17. Instrumented Fuel Element .......................................................................................... 3 1.18. Long-Term ................................................................................................................... 3 1.19. Measured Value ........................................................................................................... 3 1.20. Movable Experiment ................................................................................................... 3 1.21. On Call. ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.22. Operable ....................................................................................................................... 4 1.23. Operational Channel .................................................................................................... 4 1.24. Operating ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.25. Power Level Monitoring Channel ............................................................................... 4 1.26. Protective Action ......................................................................................................... 4 1.27. Pulse Mode .................................................................................................................. 4 1.28. Reactivity Worth of an Experiment.. .......................................................................... .4 1.29. Reactor Operating ........................................................................................................ 4 1.30. Reactor Operator .......................................................................................................... 5 1.31. Reactor Safety Systems ............................................................................................... 5 1.32. Reactor Secured ........................................................................................................... 5 1.33. Reactor Shutdown........................................................................................................ 5 1.34. Reference Core Condition ........................................................................................... 5 1.35. Safety Channel. ............................................................................................................ 6 1.36. Scram Time .................................................................................................................. 6 1.3 7. Secured Experiment ..................................................................................................... 6 11

1.38. Senior Reactor Operator .............................................................................................. 6 1.39. Shall, Should, and May ................................................................................................ 6 1.40. Shutdown Margin ........................................................................................................ 6 1.41. Standard Control Rod .................................................................................................. 6 1.42. Steady State Mode ....................................................................................................... 6 1.43. Surveillance Intervals .................................................................................................. 7 1.44. Transient Rod .............................................................................................................. 7 1.45. True Value ................................................................................................................... 7 1.46. Unscheduled Shutdown ............................................................................................... 7 2.0. SAFETY LIMIT AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTING 2.1. Safety Limit: Fuel Element Temperature ................................................................... 8 2.2. Limiting Safety System Setting for Fuel Temperature ................................................ 8 3.0. LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATIONS 3.1. Reactor Core Parameters ........................................................................................... 10 3 .1.1. Steady State Operation .................................................................................... 10 3 .1.2. Pulse Mode Operation ..................................................................................... 10 3 .1.3. Reactivity Limitations ..................................................................................... 11 3.2. Reactor Control and Safety Systems ........................................................................ .12 3.2.1. Reactor Control System ................................................................................... 12 3.2.2. Reactor Safety Systems ................................................................................... 13 3.2.3. Facility Interlock System ................................................................................. 15 3 .3. Coolant Systems ........................................................................................................ 16 3.4. Ventilation System .................................................................................................... 17 3.5. Radiation-Monitoring System and Effluents ............................................................. 19 3.5.1. Monitoring System .......................................................................................... 19

3.5.2. Effluents

Argon-41 Discharge Limit ............................................................ .20 3.6. Limitations on Experiments ....................................................................................... 21

3. 7. Fuel Parameters ......................................................................................................... 24 4.0. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.1. Reactor Core Parameters ........................................................................................... 25 4.2. Reactor Control and Safety Systems ......................................................................... 26 4.2.1. Reactor Control Systems ................................................................................. 26 4.2.2. Reactor Safety Systems ................................................................................... 27 4.2.3. Fuel Temperature ............................................................................................. 28 4.2.4 Facility Interlock System ................................................................................ .29 4.3. Coolant Systems ........................................................................................................ 30 4.4. Ventilation System .................................................................................................... 31 4.5. Radiation-Monitoring System and Effluents ............................................................ .31 4.5.1. Monitoring System .......................................................................................... 31 4.5.2. Effluents .......................................................................................................... 32 4.6. Reactor Fuel Elements ............................................................................................... 33 111

5.0. DESIGNFEATURES 5 .1. Site and Facility Description .................................................................................... .34 5.2. Reactor Core and Fuel ............................................................................................... 35 5.2.1. Reactor Fuel ..................................................................................................... 35 5.2.2. Reactor Core .................................................................................................... 36 5.2.3. Control Rods .................................................................................................... 37 5.3. Fuel Storage ............................................................................................................... 38 6.0. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.1. Organization .............................................................................................................. 39 6.1.1. Structure ........................................................................................................... 39 6.1.2. Responsibility .................................................................................................. 40 6.1.3. Staffing ............................................................................................................ 40 6.1.3.1. Selection of Personnel ...................................................................... .40 6.1.3.2. Operations ........................................................................................... 41 6.1.3.3. Training of Personnel ........................................................................ 42 6.2. Review and Audit - The Reactor and Radiation Facilities Safety Subcommittee (RRFSS) ............................................................................................ 43 6.2.1. Composition and Qualifications ..................................................................... .43 6.2.1.1. Composition....................................................................................... 43 6.2.1.2. Qualifications ..................................................................................... 43 6.2.2. Function and Authority .................................................................................... 44 6.2.2.1. Function ............................................................................................. 44 6.2.2.2. Authority ............................................................................................ 44 6.2.3. Rules ................................................................................................................ 44 6.2.3 .1. Alternates ........................................................................................... 44 6.2.3.2. Meeting Frequency ............................................................................ 44 6.2.3.3. Quorum .............................................................................................. 44 6.2.3.4. Voting Rules ...................................................................................... 44 6.2.3.5. Minutes .............................................................................................. 45 6.2.4. Review Function .............................................................................................. 45 6.2.5. Audit Function ................................................................................................. 45 6.3. Procedures ................................................................................................................. 46 6.4. Review and Approval ofExperiments ...................................................................... .47 6.5. Required Actions ....................................................................................................... 48 6.5.1. Actions to be Taken in Case of Safety Limit Violation ................................. .48 6.5.2. Reportable Occurrences ................................................................................... 48 6.5.3. Actions to be Taken in Case of Reportable Occurrences ............................... .49 6.6. Operating Reports ...................................................................................................... 50 6.7. Records ...................................................................................................................... 53 lV

6. 7 .1. Records to be Retained for a Period of At Least Five Years .................... 53
6. 7 .2. Records to be Retained for At Least One Certification Cycle .................. 53 6.7.3. Records to be Retained for the Life of the Facility ............................... 53 v

1.0. DEFINITIONS 1.1. ALARA The ALARA program (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) is a program for maintaining occupational exposures to radiation and release of radioactive effluents to the environment as low as reasonably achievable.

1.2. CHANNEL A channel is the combination of sensor, line, amplifier, and output devices that are connected for the purpose of measuring the value of a parameter.

1.3. CHANNEL CALIBRATION A channel calibration is an adjustment of the channel such that its output corresponds with acceptable accuracy to known values of the parameter that the channel measures.

Calibration shall encompass the entire channel, including equipment actuation, alarm, or trip, and shall be deemed to include a channel test.

1.4. CHANNEL CHECK A channel check is a qualitative verification of acceptable performance by observation of channel behavior, or by comparison of the channel with other independent channels or systems measuring the same parameter.

1.5. CHANNEL TEST A channel test is the introduction of a signal into the channel for verification that it is operable.

1.6 CONFINEMENT Confinement is an enclosure of the overall facility that is designed to limit the release of effluents between the enclosure and its external environment through controlled or defined pathways.

1.7 CONTROL ROD A control rod is a device fabricated from neutron absorbing material or fuel, or both, that is used to establish neutron flux changes and to compensate for routine reactivity losses.

Scrammable control rods can be quickly uncoupled from their drive units to rapidly shutdown the reactor if needed.

1

1.8. CORE CONFIGURATION The core configuration includes the number, type, or arrangement of fuel elements and standard control rods/transient rod occupying the core grid.

1.9. CORE GRID POSITION The core grid position refers to the location of a fuel element, control rod, or experiment in the grid plate. It is specified by a letter indicating the specific ring in the grid plate and a number indicating a particular position within that ring.

1.10. EMERGENCY STOP Emergency Stop is a safety interlock designed to prevent or cease reactor operations. Emergency stop buttons are provided in Exposure Room 1, Exposure Room 2 and on the console 1.11. EXCESS REACTIVITY Excess reactivity is that amount of reactivity that would exist if all control rods were moved to the maximum reactive condition from the point where the reactor is exactly critical (keff = 1) at reference core conditions or at a specific set of conditions.

1.12. EXPERIMENT Any operation, hardware, or target (excluding devices such as detectors, foils, etc.)

that is designed to investigate nonroutine reactor characteristics or that is intended for irradiation within an experimental facility. Hardware rigidly secured to the core or shield structure so as to be a part of its design to carry out experiments is not normally considered an experiment.

1.13. EXPERIMENTAL FACILITIES The experimental facilities associated with the AFRRl TRIGA reactor shall be:

a. Exposure Room # 1
b. Exposure Room #2
c. Reactor Pool
d. Core Experiment Tube (CET)
e. Portable Beam Tubes
f. Pneumatic Transfer System 2
g. In-core Locations 1.14. FUEL ELEMENT A fuel element is a single TRJGA fuel rod or the fuel portion of a fuel follower control rod(FFCR).

1.15 HIGH FLUX SAFETY CHANNEL A high flux safety channel is a power measuring safety channel in the reactor safety system 1.16. INITIAL STARTUP AND APPROACH TO POWER The first reactor startup and approach to power following fuel element relocation within the core and/or any significant (>$0.25) core configuration changes.

1.17. INSTRUMENTED FUEL ELEMENT An instrumented fuel element is a fuel element in which one or more thermocouples have been embedded for the purpose of measuring fuel temperatures.

1.18. LONG-TERM STORAGE Long-term storage of fuel applies to fuel that has been taken out of service with no plans for use for more than one fuel measurement cycle.

1.19. MEASURED VALUE The measured value is the value of a parameter as it appears on the output of a channel.

1.20. MOVABLE EXPERJMENT A movable experiment is one where it is intended that all or part of the experiment may be moved near the core or into and out of the core while the reactor is operating.

1.21. ON CALL A person is considered on call if:

a. The individual has been specifically designated and the operator knows of the designation;
b. The individual keeps the operator posted as to their whereabouts and telephone number; 3
c. The individual remains at a reachable location and is capable of getting to the reactor facility Within 60 minutes under normal circumstances; and
d. The individual remains in a state of readiness to perform their duties.

1.22. OPERABLE Operable means a component or system is capable of performing its intended function.

1.23. OPERATIONAL CHANNEL Operational Channel: The Operational Channel is a power measuring channel used during steady state and square wave operations 1.24. OPERATING Operating means a component or system is performing its intended function.

1.25. POWER LEVEL MONITORING CHANNEL A power level monitoring channel is defined to be a channel that is intended to provide real time power level readings to the operator.

1.26. PROTECTIVE ACTION Protective action is the initiation of a signal or the operation of equipment within the reactor safety system in response to a parameter or condition of the reactor facility having reached a specified set point.

1.27. PULSE MODE Operation in the pulse mode shall mean that the reactor is intentionally placed on a prompt critical excursion by making a step insertion of reactivity above critical with the transient rod. The reactor may be pulsed from a critical or subcritical state.

1.28. REACTIVITY WORTH OF AN EXPERIMENT The reactivity worth of an experiment is the value of the reactivity change that results from the experiment being inserted into or removed from its intended position.

1.29. REACTOROPERATING The reactor is operating whenever it is not secured or shutdown.

4

1.30. REACTOR OPERATOR A reactor operator is an individual who is licensed to manipulate the controls of a reactor.

1.31. REACTOR SAFETY SYSTEMS Reactor safety systems are those systems, including their associated input channels that are designed to initiate a reactor scram for the primary purpose of protecting the reactor or to provide information for initiation of manual protective action.

1.32. REACTOR SECURED The reactor is secured when:

a. Either there is insufficient moderator available in the reactor to attain criticality or there is insufficient fissile material in the reactor to attain criticality under optimum available conditions of moderation and reflection; or,
b. All of the following conditions exist:
1. All control rods are fully inserted into the core;
2. The console key switch is in the off position and the key is removed;
3. No work is in progress involving fuel movement, core structure, installed control rods, or control rod drives unless they are physically decoupled from the control rods; and
4. No experiments are being moved or serviced that have, on movement, a reactivity worth exceeding $1.00.

1.33. REACTOR SHUTDOWN The reactor is shutdown when it is subcritical by at least $1.00 of reactivity in the reference core condition with the reactivity worth of all installed experiments included.

1.34. REFERENCE CORE CONDITION The reference core condition is when the core it is at ambient temperature and the reactivity worth of xenon is negligible (<$0.01).

5

1.35. SAFETY CHANNEL A safety channel is a high flux safety channel with scram capability.

1.36. SCRAM TIME Scram time is the elapsed time between the initiation of a scram signal and the full insertion of the control rod.

1.37. SECURED EXPERIMENT A secured experiment is any experiment or experimental component held in a stationary position relative to the reactor by mechanical means. The restraining forces must be greater than those to which the experiment might be subjected by hydraulic, pneumatic, buoyant, or other forces that are normal to the operating environment, or by forces which can arise as a result of credible malfunctions.

1.38. SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR A senior reactor operator is an individual who is licensed to direct the activities of reactor operators. Such an individual is also a reactor operator.

1.39. SHALL, SHOULD, AND MAY The word "shall" is used to denote a requirement; the word "should" is used to denote a recommendation; and the word "may" is used to denote permission, neither a requirement nor a recommendation.

1.40. SHUTDOWN MARGIN Shutdown margin is the minimum shutdown reactivity necessary to provide confidence that the reactor can be made subcritical by means of the control and safety systems, starting from any permissible operating condition and with the most reactive rod in the most reactive position, and that the reactor will remain subcritical without further operator action..

1.41. STANDARD CONTROL ROD A standard control rod is a control rod having* electromechanical drive and scram capabilities. It is withdrawn by an electromagnet/armature system.

1.42. STEADY STATE MODE Operation in the steady state mode shall mean operation of the reactor either by manual operation of the control rods or by automatic operation of one or more control rods at power levels not exceeding 1.1 MW.

6

1.43. SURVEILLANCE INTERVALS Allowable surveillance intervals shall not exceed the following:

a. Biennial- interval not to exceed 30 months
b. Annual-interval not to exceed 15 months
c. Semi-annual- interval not to exceed 7.5 months
d. Quarterly - interval not to exceed 4 months
e. Monthly - interval not to exceed 6 weeks
f. Weekly - interval not to exceed 10 days 1.44. TRANSIENT ROD The transient rod is a control rod with scram capabilities that can be rapidly ejected from the reactor core to produce a pulse. It is activated by applying compressed air to a piston.

1.45. TRUE VALUE The true value is the actual value of a parameter.

1.46. UNSCHEDULED SHUTDOWN An unscheduled shutdown is defined as any unplanned shutdown of the reactor caused by actuation of the reactor safety systems, operator error, equipment malfunction, or a manual shutdown in response to conditions that could adversely affect safe operation, not including shutdowns that occur during testing or checkout.

7

2.0. SAFETY LIMIT AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTING 2.1. SAFETY LIMIT: FUEL ELEMENT TEMPERATURE Applicability This specification applies to the temperature of the reactor fuel.

Objective The objective is to define the maximum fuel element temperature that can be permitted with confidence that no damage to the fuel element cladding shall result.

Specification The maximum temperature in a TRIGA fuel element shall not exceed 1,000°C under any mode of operation.

The important parameter for a TRI GA reactor is the fuel element temperature. This parameter is well suited as a single specification because it can be measured. A loss in the integrity of the fuel element cladding could arise from a buildup of excessive pressure between the fuel-moderator and cladding ifthe fuel temperature exceeds the safety limit. The pressure is caused by the presence of air, fission product gases, and hydrogen from the dissociation of the hydrogen and zirconium in the fuel-moderator. The magnitude of this pressure is determined by the fuel-moderator temperature and the ratio of hydrogen to zirconium in the alloy. ,

The safety limit for the TRIGA fuel is based on data which indicates that the stress in the cladding will remain below the ultimate stress, provided that the temperature of the fuel does not exceed l,000°C and the fuel cladding is water cooled.

2.2. LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTING FOR FUEL TEMPERATURE Applicability This specification applies to the scram settings which prevent the safety limit from being reached.

Objective The objective is to prevent the safety limit from being reached.

Specification 8

The limiting safety system setting shall be equal to or less than 600°C, as measured in the instrumented fuel elements. There shall be two fuel temperature safety channels. One channel shall utilize an instrumented fuel element in the Bring, and the second channel shall utilize an instrumented fuel element in the C ring.

Basis The limiting safety system setting is a temperature which, if exceeded, shall cause a reactor scram to be initiated, preventing the safety limit from being exceeded. A setting of 600°C provides a safety margin of 400°C for TRIGA fuel elements. Part of the safety margin is used to account for the difference between the true and the measured temperatures resulting from the actual location of the thermocouple. If the instrumented fuel element is located in the hottest position in the core, the difference between the true and measured temperatures will be only a few degrees. There are two fuel temperature monitoring channels within the reactor core (one in the B ring and one in the C ring). The highest power density occurs in these two rings, and therefore provides temperature monitoring in the hottest locations of the reactor core. Table 4-14 of the AFRRI Safety Analysis Report identifies the rod power factors for each fuel location in the reactor core. Within the B ring, the highest and lowest power factors are 1.552 and 1.525, respectively. Assuming the instrumented fuel element is located in the lowest power density position (B-1 ), a temperature indication of 600°C would yield a peak temperature at the highest power density location (B-4) of 611°C. Within the Cring, the highest and lpwest power factors are 1.438 and 1.374, respectively. Assuming the instrumented fuel element is located in the lowest power density position (C-12), a temperature indication of 600°C would yield a peak temperature at the highest power density location (C-9) of 628°C.

9

3.0. LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATIONS 3.1. REACTOR CORE PARAMETERS 3.1.1. STEADY STATE OPERATION Applicability This specification applies to the maximum reactor power attained during steady state operation.

Objective The objective is to ensure that the fuel temperature safety limit shall not be exceeded during steady state operation.

Specification The reactor steady state power level shall not exceed 1.1 MW.

The thermal-hydraulic analysis of steady state operation using the RELAP5 computer code, as detailed in the AFRRI Safety Analysis Report, indicates that the reactor may be safely operated with TRI GA fuel at a power level of 1.1 MW.

3.1.2. PULSE MODE OPERATION Applicability This specification applies to the maximum thermal energy produced in the reactor as a result of a prompt critical insertion of reactivity.

Objective The objective is to ensure that the fuel temperature safety limit shall not be exceeded during pulse mode operation.

Specification The maximum step insertion ofreactivity shall be $3.50 (2.45% ~k/k) in pulse mode.

10

Based upon calculations detailed in the AFRRI Safety Analysis Report, an insertion of $3.50 (2.45% ~)results in a peak fuel temperature ofless than 830°C.

3.1.3. REACTIVITY LIMITATIONS Applicability These specifications apply to the reactivity condition of the reactor and the reactivity worth of control rods and experiments. They apply for all modes of operation.

Objective The objective is to guarantee that the reactor can be shut down at all times and that the fuel temperature safety limit shall not be exceeded.

Specifications

a. The reactor shall not be operated with the maximum available excess reactivity greater than $5.00 (3.5% ~).
b. The shutdown margin provided by the remaining control rods with the most reactive control rod in the most reactive position shall be greater than $0.50 (0.35% ~k/k) with the reactor in the reference core condition, all irradiation facilities and experiments in place, and the total worth of all non-secured experiments in their most reactive state.
a. The limit on available excess reactivity establishes the maximum achievable power should all control rods be in their most reactive positions.
b. The value of the shutdown margin ensures that the reactor can be shut down from any operating condition, even if the most reactive control rod remains in its most reactive position.

11

3.2. REACTOR CONTROL AND SAFETY SYSTEMS 3.2.1. REACTOR CONTROL SYSTEM Applicability This specification applies to the channels monitoring the reactor core which shall provide information to the reactor operator during reactor operation. It also specifies the minimum number of operable control rod drives.

Objective The objective is to require that sufficient information be available to the operator as well as a sufficient number of operable control rod drives to ensure safe operation of the reactor.

Specifications

a. The reactor shall not be operated unless the measuring channels listed in Table 1 are operable for the specific mode of operation.
b. The reactor shall not be operated unless the four control rod drives are operable or the control rod associated with an inoperable control rod drive is/are fully inserted.
c. The time from scram initiation to the full insertion of any control rod from a full up position shall be less than 1 second.

Table 1. Minimum Measuring Channels Effective Mode Measuring Channel Steady State Pulse f<'uel Temperature Safety Channel 2 2 Linear Power Channel 1 0

!Log Power Channel 1 0 High-Flux Safety Channel 2 1 Power Pulsing Channel 0 1 (1) Any Linear Power, Log Power, High-Flux Safety or Fuel Temperature Safety Channels may be inoperable while the reactor is operating for the purpose of performing a channel check, test, or calibration.

(2) If any required measuring channel becomes inoperable while the reactor is operating for reasons other than that identified in the previous footnote (1) above, 12

the channel shall be restored to operation within five minutes or the reactor shall be immediately shutdown.

Fuel temperature displayed at the control console gives continuous information on this parameter, which has a specified safety limit. The power level channels ensure that radiation-indicating reactor core parameters are adequately monitored for both steady state and pulsing modes of operation.

The specifications on reactor power level indication are included in this section because power level is related to the fuel temperature. The four control rod drives must be operable or the control rods inserted for the safe operation of the reactor. This specification ensures that the reactor will be promptly shut down when a scram signal is initiated. Experience and analysis indicate that, for the range of transients in a TRIGA reactor, the specified scram time is adequate to ensure the safety of the reactor.

For footnote (1), talcing these measuring channels off-line for short durations for the purpose of a check, test, or calibration is considered acceptable because, in some cases, the reactor must be in operation in order to perform the check, test or calibration. For footnote (2), events which lead to these circumstances are self-revealing to the operator.

3.2.2. REACTOR SAFETY SYSTEMS Applicability This specification applies to the reactor safety systems.

Objective The objective is to specify the minimum number of reactor safety system channels that shall be operable for safe operation.

Specification The reactor shall not be operated unless the safety systems described in Tables 2 and 3 are operable for the specific mode of operation.

13

Table 2. Minimum Reactor Safety System Scrams Channel Maximum Set Point Effective Mode Steady State Pulse Fuel Temperature 600°C 2 2 Percent Power, High Flux 1.1 MW 2 0 Console Manual Scram Button Closure switch 1 1 High Voltage Loss to Safety Channel ~0% Loss 2 1 Emergency Stop Closure switch 3 3 (1 in each exposure room, 1 on console) 14 feet from the top of Pool Water Level ~he core 1 1 Watchdog (DAC to CSC) On digital console 1 1 The fuel temperature and power level scrams provide protection to ensure that the reactor can be shut down before the fuel temperature safety limit is exceeded. The manual scram allows the operator to shut down the system at any time if an unsafe or abnormal condition occurs. In the event of failure of the power supply for the safety channels, operation of the reactor without adequate instrumentation is prevented. The preset pulse timer ensures that the reactor power level will return to a low level after pulsing. The emergency stop allows personnel trapped in a potentially hazardous exposure room, or the reactor operator, to scram the reactor through the facility interlock system. The pool water level ensures that a loss of biological shielding would result in a reactor scram. The watchdog scram ensures reliable communication between the Data Acquisition Computer (DAC) and the Control System Computer (CSC).

14

Table 3. Minimum Reactor Safety System Interlocks Effective Mode Action Prevented Steady State Pulse Pulse initiation at power levels greater than 1 kW x Withdrawal of any control rod except transient x lAny rod withdrawal with count rate below 0.5 cps as measured by

~he operational channel x x Simultaneous manual withdrawal of two standard rods x

!Any rod withdrawal if high voltage is lost to the operational channel x x Withdrawal of any control rod if reactor period is less than 3 seconds x lApplication of air if the transient rod drive is not fully down x

  • Reactor safety system interlocks shall be tested daily whenever operations involving these functions are planned Tue interlock preventing the initiation of a pulse at a power level above 1 kW ensures that the pulse magnitude will not allow the fuel element temperature to exceed the safety limit. Tue interlock that prevents movement of standard control rods in pulse mode will prevent the inadvertent increase in steady state reactor power prior to initiation of a pulse. Requiring a minimum count rate to be measured by the operational channel ensures sufficient source neutrons to bring the reactor critical under controlled conditions. Tue interlock that prevents the simultaneous manual withdrawal of two standard control rods limits the amount of reactivity added per unit time. Correct high voltage to the operational channel ensures accurate power indications. Preventing the withdrawal of any control rod if the period is less than 3 seconds minimizes the possibility of exceeding the maximum permissible power level or the fuel temperature safety limit.

3.2.3. FACILITY INTERLOCK SYSTEM Applicability This specification applies to the interlocks that prevent the accidental exposure of an individual in either exposure room.

Objective 15

The objective is to provide sufficient warning and interlocks to prevent movement of the reactor core to the exposure room in which someone may be working, or prevent the inadvertent contact between the core and the lead shield doors.

Specifications Facility interlocks shall be provided so that:

a. The reactor cannot be operated unless the lead shield doors within the reactor pool are either fully opened or fully closed;
b. The reactor cannot be operated unless the exposure room plug door adjacent to the reactor core position is fully closed and the lead shield doors are fully closed; or ifthe lead shield doors are fully opened, both exposure rooms plug doors must be fully closed; and
c. The lead shield doors cannot be opened to allow movement into the exposure room projection unless a warning horn has sounded in that exposure room, or unless two licensed reactor operators have visually inspected the room to ensure that no personnel remain in the room prior to securing the plug door.

These interlocks prevent the operation and movement of the reactor core into an area until there is assurance that inadvertent exposures or facility damage will be prevented.

3.3. COOLANT SYSTEMS Applicability This specification refers to operation of the reactor with respect to the temperature and condition of the pool water.

Objective

a. To ensure the effectiveness of the resins in the water purification system;
b. To prevent activated contaminants from becoming a radiological hazard; and
c. To protect the integrity of the reactor core Specifications 16
a. The reactor shall not be operated above a thermal power of S kW when the bulk water temperature exceeds SSC;
b. The reactor shall not be operated ifthe conductivity of the bulk water is greater than S micromhos/cm; and
c. Both audible and visual alarms shall be provided to alert the AFRRJ security guards and other personnel to any drop in reactor pool water level greater than 6 inches.

Manufacturer data states that the resins in the water purification system break down with sustained operation in excess of 60°C. Based on experience, activation of impurities in the bulk water at power levels below S kW does not pose a significant radiological hazard. The conductivity limits are established to provide acceptable control of corrosion and are consistent with the fuel vendor recommendation and experience at similar reactors. The water level monitoring system provides prompt notification of a potential loss of primary coolant.

Analysis shows that full power operations are safe with bulk water temperature of 60° C. At a power level of lMW thermal, the fuel temperature reaches approximately 400 ° C, a temperature rise of approximately 380 ° C. At a power level of SkW thermal, the fuel temperature remains at ambient water temperature.

TRIGA fuel has been tested to be safe beyond 1000 ° C. The overarching objective is to protect the integrity of the fuel. If the reactor were operated at SkW indefinitely with the cooling system secured the worst case would be a fuel temperature equal to maximum ambient water temperature of 100 ° C. The published safety limit for the AFRRI TRI GA is 1000 ° C. This leaves a safety margin of 900 ° C, assuming that no repairs have been made to the cooling system during this postulated operation. These TS provides more than reasonable assurance that safe operations are maintained 3.4. VENTILATION SYSTEM Applicability This specification applies to the operation of the facility ventilation system.

Objective The objective is to ensure that the ventilation system is operable to mitigate the consequences of possible releases of radioactive material resulting from reactor operation.

17

Specification

a. The reactor shall not be operated unless the facility ventilation system is operating, except for periods of time not to exceed two continuous hours to permit repair, maintenance, or testing. In the event of a release of airborne radioactivity in the reactor room above routine reactor operation and normal background values, the ventilation system to the reactor room shall be automatically secured via closure dampers by a signal from the reactor deck continuous air particulate monitor.
b. The reactor shall not be operated in exposure room 1 or 2
1. If the relative air pressure in the exposure room in use is greater than the reactor prep area (room 1105) except for periods of time not to exceed two continuous hours to permit repair, maintenance, or testing when the dampers shall be closed.

or;

2. The prep area RAM E3 or E6 is alarming.

During normal operation of the ventilation system, the concentration of argon-41 in unrestricted areas is below the limits allowed by 10 CFR Part 20. In the event of a fuel cladding rupture resulting in a substantial release of airborne particulate radioactivity, the ventilation system dampers shall be closed, thereby isolating the reactor room. Therefore, operation of the reactor with the ventilation secured for short periods of time ensures the same degree of control of release of radioactive materials. Moreover, radiation monitors within the building independent of those in the ventilation system provide warning if high levels of radiation are detected with the ventilation system secured.

18

3.5. RADIATION-MONITORING SYSTEM AND EFFLUENTS 3.5.1. MONITORING SYSTEM Applicability This specification applies to the functions and essential components of the radiation-monitoring system which shall be operable during reactor operations.

Objective The objective is to ensure that adequate radiation monitoring channels shall be available to the operator to ensure safe operation of the reactor.

Specifications The reactor shall be secured unless the following radiation monitoring systems are operable:

a. Radiation Area Monitoring System:
1. 2 RAMS on the reactor Deck (Room 3160) are operable
11. If operating in an exposure room (ERl or ER2) the RAM adjacent to the exposure room in use shall be operable
b. Stack Gas Monitor: The stack gas monitor (SGM) shall sample and measure the gaseous effluent in the exhaust system;
c. Continuous Air Particulate Monitor: The continuous air particulate monitor (CAM) shall sample the air above the reactor pool. This unit shall be sensitive to radioactive particulate matter. Alarm of this unit shall initiate closure of the ventilation system dampers, restricting air leakage from the reactor room; and
d. Table 4 specifies the alarm and readout system for the above monitors.

19

Table 4. Locations of Radiation Monitoring Systems Readout Sampling Location Location(s)

Audible and Visual M

eactor Room (2 required) eactor and Control Rooms xp. Room 1 Area rep Area and Control Room xp. Room 2 Area rep Area and Control Room SGM eactor Exhaust eactor and Control Rooms eactor and Control Rooms This system is intended to characterize the normal operational radiological environment of the facility and to aid in evaluating abnormal operations or conditions. The radiation monitoring system provides information to the operating personnel of any existing or impending danger from radiation. The automatic closure of the ventilation system dampers restricts the flow of airborne radioactive material to the environment.

3.5.2. EFFLUENTS

ARGON-41 DISCHARGE LIMIT Applicability This specification applies to the quantity of argon-41 that may be discharged from the AFRRI TRIGA reactor facility.

Objective The objective is to ensure that the radiation dose to members of the public due to the discharge of argon-41 from the AFRRI TRI GA reactor facility shall be below the value specified in 10 CFR Part 20.

Specifications

a. An environmental radiation monitoring program shall be maintained to determine the effects of the facility on the environs; and
b. If calculations, which shall be performed at least quarterly but not to exceed 20 MWh of operation, indicate that argon-41 release in excess of 20

313 .5 curies to the unrestricted environment could be reached during the year as a result of normal reactor operations, reactor operations that generate and release significant quantities of argon-41 shall be curtailed for the remainder of the year as needed to ensure adherence with the 10 mRem constraint.

As described in the AFRRI Safety Analysis Report, COMPLY analysis indicates that the release of 313.5 curies from the stack to the unrestricted environment in one calendar year yields a dose to the maximally exposed member of the public of 9.9 mrem. Therefore, limiting argon-41 release to less than 313.5 curies ensures that 10 CPR Part 20 limits on doses to the public are not exceeded. The upper limit of 20 MWh of reactor operation between gaseous effluent analyses ensures it is not possible to exceed 15% of the 10 mrem limit between reports.

3.6. LIMITATIONS ON EXPERIMENTS Applicability This specification applies to experiments installed in the reactor and its experimental facilities.

Objective The objective is to prevent damage to the reactor or excessive release of radioactive materials in the event of an experiment malfunction such that airborne concentrations of activity averaged over a year do not exceed 10 CPR Part 20, AppendixB.

Specifications The following limitations shall apply to the irradiation of experiments:

a. If the possibility exists that a release of radioactive gases or aerosols may occur, the amount and type of material irradiated shall be limited to ensure yearly compliance with Table 2, Appendix B, of 10 CPR Part 20, assuming that 100%

of the gases or aerosols escape;

b. Each fueled experiment shall be limited such that the total inventory of iodine isotopes 131 through 13 5 in the experiment is not greater than 1. 0 curies, and the maximum strontium-90 inventory is not greater than 5 .0 millicuries; 21
c. Known explosive materials shall not be irradiated in the reactor in quantities greater than 25 milligrams. In addition, the pressure produced in the experiment container upon detonation of the explosive shall have been determined experimentally, or by calculations, to be less than half the design failure of the container;
d. Samples shall be doubly contained when release of the contained material could cause corrosion of the experimental facility or damage to the reactor;
e. The sum of the absolute reactivity worth of all experiments in the reactor and in the associated experimental facilities shall not exceed $3.00 (2.1% Mdk). This includes the total potential reactivity insertion that might result from experiment malfunction, accidental experiment flooding or voiding, and accidental removal or insertion of experiments. The absolute reactivity worth of any single secured experiment shall not exceed $3.00 (2.1 % Afdk). The absolute reactivity worth of any single moveable or unsecured experiment shall be less than $1.00 (0.70%

Afdk). The combined absolute reactivity worth of multiple moveable or unsecured experiments in the reactor and associated experimental facilities at the same time shall be less than $1.00 (0.70% Af</k);

f. In calculations regarding experiments, the following assumptions shall be made:
1. If the effluent exhausts through a filter installation designed for greater than 99% efficiency for 0.3 micron particles, at least 10% of the particles produced can escape; and
2. For a material whose boiling point is above 55°C and where vapor formed by boiling the material can escape only through an undisturbed column of water above the core, up to 10% of the vapor can escape;
g.
  • If an experimental container fails and releases materials that could damage the reactor fuel or structure by corrosion or other means, physical inspection of the reactor fuel and structure shall be performed to identify damage and potential need for corrective action. The results of the inspection and any corrective action taken shall be reviewed by the Reactor Facility Director and shall be determined to be satisfactory before operation of the reactor is resumed; and
h. Experiments shall be designed such that failure of one experiment shall not contribute to the failure of any other experiment. All operations in an experimental facility shall be supervised by a member of the reactor operations staff. All experiments shall be either secured or observed for mechanical stability to ensure that unintended movement will not cause an unplanned reactivity change in excess of$1.00.

22

a. This specification is intended to provide assurance that airborne activities in excess of the limits of Appendix B of 10 CFR Part 20 will not be released to the atmosphere outside the facility boundary.
b. The 1.0 curie limitation on iodine isotopes 131through135 and 5.0 millicurie limitation on strontium-90 ensures that, in the event of malfunction of a fueled experiment leading to total release of radioactive material including fission products, the dose to any individual will not exceed the limits of 10 CFR Part 20.
c. This specification is intended to prevent damage to reactor components resulting from malfunction of an experiment involving explosive materials.
d. This specification is intended to provide an additional safety factor where damage to the reactor and components is possible if an experiment container fails.
e. The maximum worth of experiments is limited such that their removal from the reactor at the reference core condition will not result in the reactor achieving a power level high enough to exceed the core temperature safety limit. The $3.00 limit is less than the authorized pulse magnitude. Limiting moveable or unsecured experiments to a worth less than $1.00 will prevent unintended pulsing of the reactor and unnecessary fuel mechanical stress.
f. This specification is intended to ensure that the limits of 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, are not exceeded in the event of an experiment malfunction.
g. This specification is intended to ensure that operation of the reactor with damaged reactor fuel or structure is prevented.
h. This specification ensures that unintended movement will not cause an unplanned reactivity change, physical damage or contribute to the failure of any other experiment.

23

3.7. FUEL PARAMETERS Applicability This specification applies to all fuel elements.

Objective The objective is to maintain integrity of the fuel element cladding.

Specification

1. The reactor shall not operate with damaged fuel elements, except for the purpose of locating damaged fuel elements. A fuel element shall be considered damaged and removed from the core if:
a. The transverse bend exceeds 0.0625 inches over the length of the cladding;
b. The length exceeds its original length by 0.100 inches;
c. A cladding defect exists as indicated by the release of fission products; or
d. Visual inspection identifies bulges, gross pitting, or corrosion.
2. The bumup ofuranium-235 in the UZrH fuel matrix shall not exceed 50 percent of the initial concentration.

Gross failure or obvious visual deterioration of the fuel is sufficient to warrant declaration of the fuel element as damaged. The elongation and bend limits are the values found acceptable to the USNRC (NUREG-1537).

24

4.0. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS Surveillance requirements may be deferred during reactor shutdown (except TS 4.4, TS 4.5.1 and TS 4.5.2) however; they shall be completed prior to reactor startup unless reactor operation is required for performance of the surveillance. Such surveillance shall be performed as soon as practical after reactor startup. Scheduled surveillance which cannot be performed with the reactor operating may be deferred until a planned reactor shutdown.

TS Possible to defer Reqriired prior to during shutdowns? routine operations?

1. 4.1 Reactor core parameters Yes Yes
2. 4.2.1 Reactor Control Systems Yes Yes
3. 4.2.2 Reactor Safety Systems Yes Yes
4. 4.2.3 Fuel Temperature Yes Yes
5. 4.2.4 Facility Interlock System Yes Yes
6. 4.3 Coolant Systems Yes Yes
7. 4.4 Ventilation Systems No NIA
8. - 4-.5-.1-Monitoring-System - No Yes
9. 4.5.2 Effluents No NIA
10. 4.6 Reactor Fuel Elements Yes Yes 4.1. REACTOR CORE PARAMETERS Applicability These specifications apply to the surveillance requirements for reactor core parameters.

Objective The objective is to verify that the reactor does not exceed the authorized limits for power, shutdown margin, core excess reactivity, and verification of the total reactivity worth of each control rod.

Specifications

a. The reactivity worth of each standard control rod/transient rod and the shutdown margin shall be determined annually, not to exceed 15 months, or following any significant (>$0.25) changes to core configuration (excluding in-core experiments).
b. The reactivity worth of an experiment shall be estimated before reactor power operation with the experiment the first time it is performed. If the absolute reactivity worth is estimated to be greater than $0.25, the worth shall be measured at a power level less than 1 kW.

25

c. The core excess reactivity shall be measured each day of operation involving the movement of control rods, or prior to each continuous operation exceeding more than a day, and following any significant (>$0.25) core configuration changes.

At a minimum excess reactivity shall be measured annually, not to exceed 15 months. This measurement is also a complete channel test of the linear power channel and log power channel..

d. The power coefficient ofreactivity at 100 kW and 1 MW shall be measured annually, not to exceed 15 months.

The reactivity worth of the control rods is measured to ensure that the required shutdown margin is available and to provide an accurate means for determining the reactivity worth of experiments inserted in the core. Past experience with TRIGA reactors gives assurance that measurement of the reactivity worth, on an annual basis, is adequate to ensure that no significant changes in the shutdown margin have occurred.

Excess reactivity measurements ensure that core configuration remains unchanged.

Knowledge of power coefficients allows the operator to accurately predict the reactivity necessary to achieve required power levels.

4.2. REACTOR CONTROL AND SAFETY SYSTEMS 4.2.1. REACTOR CONTROL SYSTEMS Applicability These specifications apply to the surveillance requirements for reactor control systems.

Objective The objective is to verify the operability of system components that affect the safe and proper control of the reactor.

Specifications

a. The standard control rods/transient rod shall be visually inspected for damage and deterioration annually, not to exceed 15 months.
b. The control rod drop times of all rods shall be measured semiannually, not to exceed 7.5 months. After work is done on any rod or its rod drive mechanical components, the drop time of that particular rod shall be verified.

26

c. On each day that pulse mode operation of the reactor is planned, the transient rod system is channel tested to verify that the system is operable. Semiannually, not to exceed 7.5 months, the transient rod drive cylinder and the associated air supply system shall be inspected, cleaned, and lubricated as necessary.

Visual inspection of the standard control rods/transient rod is made to evaluate corrosion and wear characteristics caused by operation in the reactor. Channel tests along with periodic maintenance ensure consistent performance.

Measurement of the rod drop times on a semiannual basis or after mechanical maintenance is a verification of the scram system and provides an indication of the capability of the control rods to perform properly.

4.2.2. REACTOR SAFETY SYSTEMS Applicability -- - - - -

These specifications apply to the surveillance requirements for measurement, test, and calibration of the reactor safety systems.

Objective The objective is to verify the performance and operability of the systems and components that are directly related to reactor safety.

Specifications

a. A channel test of the scram function of the high-flux safety channels shall be made each day that the reactor is to be operated.
b. A channel test of each of the reactor high flux safety channels for the intended mode of operation shall be performed weekly, whenever operations are planned.
c. Channel calibration shall be made of the NP, NPP, NMl 000, NL W, NMP or any other console instrumentation designated to provide direct power level information to the operator, annually not to exceed 15 months ..
d. A thermal power calibration shall be completed annually, not to exceed 15 months.

27

TRJGA system components have proven operational reliability. Daily tests ensure reliable scram functions and ensure the detection of channel drift or other possible deterioration of operating characteristics. The channel checks ensure that the safety system channel scrams are operable on a daily basis or prior to an extended run. The power level channel calibration will ensure that the reactor is operated within the authorized power levels.

4.2.3. FUEL TEMPERATURE Applicability These specifications apply to the surveillance requirements for the safety channels measuring the fuel temperature.

Objective The objective is to ensure operability of the fuel temperature measuring channels.

Specifications

a. A channel check of the fuel temperature scrams shall be made each day that the reactor is to be operated.
b. A channel calibration of the fuel temperature measuring channels shall be made annually, not to exceed 15 months.
c. A weekly channel test shall be performed on fuel temperature measuring channels, whenever operations are planned.
d. If a reactor scram caused by high fuel element temperature occurs, an evaluation shall be conducted to determine whether the fuel element temperature exceeded the safety limit.

Operational experience with the TRIGA systems demonstrates that annual calibration and weekly channel tests provides reliable fuel temperature measurements. The daily scram channel check ensures scram capabilities.

28

4.2.4. FACILITY INTERLOCK SYSTEM Applicability This specification applies to the surveillance requirements that ensure the integrity of the facility interlock system.

Objective The objective is to ensure performance and operability of the facility interlock system.

Specifications Functional checks shall be made annually, not to exceed 15 months, to ensure the following-: -

a. With the lead shield doors open, neither exposure room plug door can be electrically opened.
b. The core dolly cannot be moved into region 2 with the lead shield doors closed.
c. The lead shield doors cannot be opened to allow movement into the exposure room projection unless a warning horn has sounded in that exposure room, or unless two licensed reactor operators have visually inspected the room to ensure that no personnel remain in the room prior to securing the plug door.

These functional checks will verify operation of the interlock system.

Experience at AFRRI indicates that this is adequate to ensure operability.

29

4.3. COOLANT SYSTEMS Applicability This specification applies to the surveillance requirements for monitoring the pool water and the water conditioning system.

Objective The objective is to ensure the integrity of the water purification system, thus maintaining the purity of the reactor pool water, minimizing possible radiation hazards from activated impurities in the water system, and limiting the potential corrosion of fuel cladding and other components in the primary water system.

Specifications

a. The pool water temperature, as measured near the input to the water purification system, shall be measured daily, whenever operations are planned.
b. The conductivity of the bulk water shall be measured monthly, not to exceed 6 weeks.
c. The reactor coolant shall be measured for radioactivity quarterly, not to exceed 4 months.
d. The audible and visual reactor pool level alarms shall be tested quarterly, not to exceed 4 months.

Based on experience, observation at these intervals provides acceptable surveillance of limits that ensure that fuel cladding corrosion and neutron activation of dissolved materials are minimized. Testing of the audible and visual alarms ensures that personnel will be able to detect and respond to pool water loss in a timely manner.

The pool water temperature is continuously displayed on the reactor console and is manually recorded at the beginning of each day of reactor operations. The conductivity of the bulk pool water is monitored to help minimize the activation of impurities in the water system and monitor the possibility of corrosion in the fuel cladding or reactor system components.

30

4.4. VENTILATION SYSTEM Applicability This specification applies to isolation of the facility ventilation system.

Objective The objective is to ensure the proper operation of the ventilation system in controlling the release of radioactive material into the unrestricted environment.

Specification

1. The operating mechanism of the ventilation system dampers in the reactor room shall be verified to be operable and visually inspected monthly, not to exceed 6

-weeks.- -

2. The relative air pressure in the exposure room to be used shall be verified to be negative each day operations in the affected exposure room are planned.
3. The reactor exhaust damper flow failure closure system shall be tested each day that reactor operations are planned.

Experience accumulated over years of operation has demonstrated that tests of the ventilation system dampers on a monthly basis are sufficient to ensure proper operation of the system and control of the release of radioactive material.

4.5. RADIATION-MONITORING SYSTEM AND EFFLUENTS 4.5.1. MONITORING SYSTEM Applicability This specification applies to surveillance requirements for the radiation monitoring system.

Objective The objective is to ensure that the radiation monitoring equipment is operating and to verify the appropriate alarm settings.

31

Specification The radiation area monitoring, continuous air particulate monitoring, and stack gas monitoring systems shall be channel tested quarterly, not to exceed 4 months. A channel check of these systems shall be performed daily to verify operability when operations are planned. These systems shall be calibrated annually, not to exceed 15 months.

Experience has shown that quarterly verification of radiation area monitoring, continuous air particulate monitoring, and stack gas monitoring systems set points in conjunction with a quarterly channel test is adequate to correct for any variation in the system due to a change of operating characteristics over a long time span.

4.5.2. EFFLUENTS Applicability This specification applies to surveillance requirements for environmental monitoring.

Objective The objective is to ensure the health and safety of the public through detection of the release of radioactive material to the environment.

Specifications

a. The unrestricted area outside of AFRRI shall be monitored by dosimeters that shall be analyzed quarterly, not to exceed 4 months.
b. Samples of soil, vegetation, and water in the vicinity of the reactor shall be collected and tested for radioactivity quarterly, not to exceed 4 months.
c. A gaseous effluent release report shall be generated quarterly or every 20 MW hours of reactor operations (whichever comes first) to ensure radioactive effluents will not exceed the annual dose limits to the public.

32

Experience has shown that quarterly environmental monitoring is sufficient to detect and quantify any release of radioactive material from research reactors. The requirement for gaseous effluent release reports will ensure that Ar-41 production from normal reactor operations does not exceed 10CFR20 annual dose limits to the public.

4.6. REACTOR FUEL ELEMENTS Applicability This specification applies to the surveillance requirements for the fuel elements.

Objective The objective is to verify the specifications for fuel elements are met.

Specifications Fuel elements shall be inspected visually for damage or deterioration and measured for length and bend in accordance with the following:

a. Before being placed in the core for the first time or following long-term storage;
b. Every two years, not to exceed 30 months, or at intervals not to exceed 500 pulses of insertion greater than $2.00, whichever comes first, for fuel elements in the B, C, and D rings;
c. Every four years (not to exceed 54 months), or at intervals not to exceed 500 pulses of insertion greater than $2.00, whichever comes first, for fuel elements in the E and Frings; and
d. If damage, deterioration, or unacceptable length and bend measurements are found in one or more fuel elements, all fuel elements in the core shall be inspected for damage or deterioration and measured for length and bend.

The frequency of inspection and measurement is based on the parameters most likely to affect the fuel cladding of a pulse reactor. Inspecting fuel elements in rings with higher power factors more frequently will provide early indication of fuel damage while significantly reducing the amount of fuel movement required.

33

5.0. DESIGNFEATURES 5.1. SITE AND FACILITY DESCRIPTION Applicability This specification applies to the reactor building.

Objective The objective is to restrict the amount ofradioactivity released into the environment.

Specifications

a. The reactor building, as a structurally independent building in the AFRRI complex, shall have its own ventilation system branch. The effluent from the reactor ventilation system shall exhaust through absolute filters to a stack having a minimum elevation that is 18 feet above the roof of the highest building in the AFRRI complex.
b. The reactor room shall contain a minimum free volume of 22,000 cubic feet.
c. The ventilation system air ducts to the reactor room shall be equipped with dampers which automatically close off ventilation to the reactor room upon a signal from the reactor room continuous air particulate monitor.
d. The reactor room shall be designed to restrict air leakage when the ventilation system dampers are closed.
e. The reactor areas exhausting through the reactor ventilation system shall include the Controlled Access Area (CAA) and the Reactor Control Area (RCA). The specific rooms included in each of those areas shall be listed in the Physical Security Plan for the AFRRI TRI GA Reactor Facility.
f. The reactor is housed in building #42 of the AFRRI complex and the restricted areas are located within that structure. The restricted areas are described in the SAR for the AFRRI reactor facility section 1.3.1 including figures 2-2 through 2-4 which describe the location of the reactor in the AFRRI complex.

Figures 3-1 through 3-4 are the floor plan layouts which identify the reactor areas The facility is designed so that the ventilation system will normally maintain a negative pressure with respect to adjacent areas, limiting personnel exposure. The free air volume within the reactor building is confined when there is an emergency shutdown of the ventilation system. Building construction and gaskets around 34

doorways help restrict leakage of air into or out of the reactor room. The stack height ensures an adequate dilution of effluents well above ground level. The separate ventilation system branch ensures a dedicated air flow system for reactor effluents and shall exhaust from all reactor spaces.

5.2. REACTOR CORE AND FUEL 5.2.1. REACTORFUEL Applicability These specifications apply to the fuel elements including fuel follower control rods used in the reactor core.

Objective The objectives are to (1) ensure that the fuel elements are designed and fabricated in such a manner as to permit their use with a high degree of reliability with respect to their physical and nuclear characteristics, and (2) ensure that the fuel elements used in the core are comparable to those analyzed in the Safety Analysis Report.

Specifications The individual non-irradiated TRIGA fuel elements shall have the following

.characteristics:

a. Uranium content: Maximum of9.0 weight percent enriched to less than 20% uranium-235. In the fuel follower, the maximum uranium content shall be 12.0 weight percent enriched to less than 20% uranium-235.
b. Hydrogen-to-zirconium atom ratio (in the ZrHx): Nominal 1.7 H atoms to 1.0 Zr atoms with a range between 1.6 and 1.7.
c. Cladding: 304 stainless steel, nominal 0.020 inches thick.
d. Any burnable poison used for the specific purpose of compensating for fuel burnup or long-term reactivity adjustments shall be an integral part of the manufactured fuel elements.

35

A maximum uranium content of9.0 weight percent in a TRIGA element is greater than the design value of 8.5 weight percent and encompasses the maximum probable variation in individual elements. Such an increase in loading would result in an increase in power density of less than 6%. The hydrogen-to-zirconium ratio of 1. 7 will produce a maximum pressure within the cladding that is well below the rupture strength of the cladding. The local power density of a 12.0 weight percent fuel follower is 21 % greater than an 8.5 weight percent TRIGA fuel element in the D ring. The volume of fuel in a fuel follower control rod is 56% of the volume of a TRIGA fuel element.

Therefore, the actual power produced in the fuel follower rod is 33% less than the power produced in a TRI GA fuel element in the D ring.

5.2.2. REACTOR CORE Applicability These specifications apply to the configuration of fuel and in-core experiments.

Objective The objective is to restrict the arrangement of fuel elements and experiments to provide assurance that excessive power densities will not be produced.

Specifications

a. The reactor core shall consist ofTRIGA reactor fuel elements in a close packed array with a minimum of two thermocouple instrumented TRIGA reactor fuel elements.
b. There shall be four single core positions occupied by the three standard control rods and transient rod, a neutron startup source with holder, and positions for possible in-core experiments.
c. The core shall be cooled by natural convection water flow.
d. In-core experiments shall not replace Bring, Cring, and/or D ring fuel elements within the reactor core.

36

TRIGA cores have been in use for decades and their safe operational characteristics are well documented. Analysis has shown that natural convection water flow provides sufficient cooling to ensure that the fuel temperature safety limit is not exceeded during reactor operations in accordance with the Technical Specifications. Placement of in-core experiments in the Bring, Cring, and/or D ring is restricted to ensure safe power peaking in adjacent fuel element positions.

5.2.3. CONTROL RODS Applicability These specifications apply to the control rods used in the reactor core.

Objective The objective is to ensure that the control rods are designed to permit their use with a high degree of reliability with respect to their physical and nuclear characteristics.

Specifications

a. The standard control rods shall have scram capability, contain borated graphite, B4C powder, or boron and its compounds in solid form as a poison in aluminum or stainless steel cladding. These rods may have an aluminum, air, or fuel follower. If fuel followed, the fuel region will conform to Technical Specification 5.2.1.
b. The transient control rod shall have scram capability and contain borated graphite, B4C powder, or boron and its compounds in solid form as a poison in aluminum or stainless steel cladding. This rod may incorporate an aluminum, poison, or air follower.

The poison requirements for the control rods are satisfied by using neutron absorbing borated graphite, B4C powder, or boron and its compounds. These materials must be contained in a suitable cladding material, such as aluminum or stainless steel, to ensure mechanical stability during movement and to isolate the poison from the pool water environment. Scram capabilities are provided by the rapid insertion of the control rods, which is the primary operational safety feature of the reactor. The transient control rod is designed for use in a pulsing TRI GA reactor.

37

5.3. FUEL STORAGE Applicability This specification applies to the storage of reactor fuel at times when it is not in the reactor core.

Objective The objective is to ensure that stored fuel does not become critical and does not reach an unsafe temperature.

Specification All fuel elements not in the reactor core shall be stored and handled in accordance with applicable regulations. Irradiated fuel elements and fueled devices shall be stored in an array that will permit sufficient natural convective cooling by water or air and the fuel element or fueled device temperature will not exceed design values.

Storage shall be such that stored fuel elements remain subcritical under all conditions of moderation and reflection in a configuration where keff is not greater than 0.90.

The limits imposed by this specification are conservative and ensure safe storage and handling. Experience shows that approximately 67 TRIGA fuel elements in a closely packed array are required to achieve criticality. Calculations show that in the event of a full storage rack failure with all 12 elements falling in the most reactive nucleonic configuration, the mass would be less than that required for criticality.

Therefore, under normal storage conditions, criticality cannot be reached.

38

6.0. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.1 . ORGANIZATION 6.1.1. STRUCTURE Organizational changes to the general AFRRI organizational structure may occur based on AFRRI requirements and will be depicted in internal documents, however, organizational changes to the management and operation of the reactor facility shall not be made without a change to TS 6.1.1.

Figure 1. Organization of Personnel for Management and Operation of the AFRRI Reactor Facility Level 1 AFRRI Licensee Level2 AFRRI A:Ms~ty Head, Radiation

... ____ _ Reactor and Radiation Safety Officer

Sciences Department, A_ ~'I' Radiation Facilities Safety Reactor Facility Subcommittee Director Level3 Reactor Operations Supervisor Level4 Reactor Operations Staff *

  • Any reactor staff member has di rect acce.ss to the AFRRI Li censee for matters concern i ng saf ety.

39

MANAGEMENT LEVELS Level 1: AFRRI Director: Responsible for the facility license.

Level 2: Reactor Facility Director: Responsible for reactor facility operations and administration shall report to Level 1.

Level 3: Reactor Operations Supervisor: Responsible for the day-to-day operation of the reactor and shall report to Level 2.

Level 4: Reactor Operating Staff: Licensed reactor operators and senior reactor operators and trainees. These individuals shall report to Level 3 for matters involving reactor operations.

6.1.2. RESPONSIBILITY The AFRRI Licensee shall have license responsibility for the reactor facility.

The Reactor Facility Director (RFD) shall be responsible for administration and operation of the reactor facility and for determination of applicability of procedures, experiment authorizations, maintenance, and operations. The Reactor Facility Director may designate an individual who meets the requirements of Technical Specifications 6.1.3.1.a to discharge these responsibilities during an extended absence. During brief absences (periods less than 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />) of the Reactor Facility Director and his designee, the Reactor Operations Supervisor shall discharge these responsibilities The Radiation Safety Officer shall be responsible for implementing the radiation safety program for the AFRRI TRIGA reactor. The requirements of the radiation safety program are established in 10CFR20. The program shall comply with the requirements in 10CFR20. Additional guidelines from ANSI/ANS-15 .11-1993 ;R2004 "Radiation Protection at Research Reactor Facilities" should be considered.

6.1.3. STAFFING 6.1.3 .1. Selection of Personnel

a. AFRRI Licensee The AFRRI Licensee is the AFRRI Director. The AFRRI Director has management responsibility for adhering to the terms and conditions of the AFRRI reactor license R-84, the AFRRI 02 byproduct license, the AFRRI Technical Specifications and for protecting the health and safety of the facility staff and members of the public.
b. Reactor Facility Director 40

At the time of appointment to this position, the Reactor Facility Director shall have six or more years of nuclear experience.

The individual shall have a baccalaureate or higher degree in an engineering or scientific field. The degree may fulfill up to four years of experience on a one-for-one basis. The Reactor Facility Director shall have held a USNRC Senior Reactor Operator license on the AFRRI reactor for at least one year before appointment to this position.

c. Reactor Operations Supervisor At the time of appointment to this position, the Reactor Operations Supervisor shall have three years nuclear experience. Higher education in a scientific or engineering field may fulfill up to two years of experience on a one-for-one basis. The Reactor Operations Supervisor shall hold a USNRC Senior Reactor Operator license on the AFRRI reactor. In addition, the Reactor Operations Supervisor shall have one year of experience as a USNRC licensed Senior Reactor Operator at AFRRI or at a similar facility before the appointment to this position.
d. Reactor Operators/Senior Reactor Operators At the time of appointment to this position, an individual shall have a high school diploma or equivalent, and shall possess the appropriate USNRC license.
e. Additional reactor staff as required for support and training At the time of appointment to the reactor staff, an individual shall possess a high school diploma or equivalent.

6.1.3.2. Operations

a. Minimum staff when the reactor is not secured shall include:

I. A licensed Senior Reactor Operator on call, but not necessarily on site;

2. Radiation control technician on call, but not necessarily on site;
3. At least one licensed Reactor Operator or Senior Reactor Operator present in the control room; and 41
4. Another person within the AFRRI complex who is able to carry out written emergency procedures, instructions of the operator, or to summon help in case the operator becomes incapacitated.
5. One licensed Senior Reactor Operator may fill both the on call and control room positions simultaneously. In that case, the minimum staff is three persons.
b. A Senior Reactor Operator shall be present at the reactor during the following operations:
1. All fuel or control rod relocations within the reactor core region (control rod movement associated with routine reactor operation is not considered to be a relocation);
2. Initial reactor startup and approach to power;
3. Recovery from an unplanned or unscheduled shutdown.;

and

4. Relocation of any experiment with reactivity worth greater than $1. 00.
c. A list of the names and telephone numbers of the following personnel shall be readily available to the operator on duty:
1. Management personnel (Reactor Facility Director, AFRRI Licensee) or designee;
2. Radiation safety personnel (AFRRI Radiation Safety Officer) or designee; and
3. Other operations personnel (Reactor Staff, Reactor Operations Supervisor) 6.1.3.3. Training of Personnel Training and retraining program shall be maintained to ensure adequate levels of proficiency in persons involved in the reactor and reactor operations. The training and retraining program will be consistent with the NRC-approved reactor requalification plan.

42

6.2. REVIEW AND AUDIT - THE REACTOR AND RADIATION FACILITIES SAFETY SUBCOMMITTEE CRRFSS) 6.2.1. COMPOSITION AND QUALIFICATIONS 6.2.1.1. Composition

a. Regular RRFSS Members (Permanent Members)
1. The following shall be members of the RRFSS:
a. AFRRI Radiation Safety Officer
b. AFRRI Reactor Facility Director
2. The following shall be appointed to the RRFSS by the AFRRI Licensee:
a. Chairman
b. One to three non-AFRRI members who are knowledgeable in fields related to reactor safety. At least one shall be a Reactor Operations Specialist or a Health Physics Specialist.
b. Special RRFSS Members (Temporary Members)
1. Other knowledgeable persons to serve as alternates in section 6.2.1.1.a.2.b above as appointed by the AFRRI Licensee.
2. Voting ad hoc members, appointed by the AFRRI Licensee to assist in review of a particular problem.
c. Nonvoting members as appointed by the AFRRI Licensee.

6.2.1.2. Qualifications The minimum qualifications for a person on the RRFSS shall be six years of professional experience in the discipline or specific field represented. A baccalaureate degree may fulfill four years of experience.

43

6.2.2. FUNCTION AND AUTHORITY 6.2.2.1. Function The RRFSS is directly responsible to the AFRRI Licensee. The subcommittee shall review all radiological health and safety matters concerning the reactor and its associated equipment, the structural reactor facility, and those items listed in Section 6.2.4.

6.2.2.2. Authority The RRFSS shall report to the AFRRI Licensee and shall advise the Reactor Facility Director in those areas of responsibility specified in Section 6.2.4.

6.2.3. RULES 6.2.3. I. Alternates Alternate members may be appointed in writing by the RRFSS Chairman to serve on a temporary basis. No more than two alternates shall participate on a voting basis in RRFSS activities at any one time.

6.2.3.2. Meeting Frequency The RRFSS shall meet at least two times during a calendar year.

Any member of the RRFSS may submit a written request to the RRFSS Chairman to convene a special meeting of the RRFSS to discuss urgent matters.

6.2.3.3. Quorum A quorum of the RRFSS for review shall consist of a minimum of four members that can vote and occupy the following positions; the Chairman (or designated alternate), the Reactor Facility Director (or designated alternate), the Radiation Safety Officer (or designated alternate), and one or more non-AFRRI member. A majority of those present shall be regular members. The operating staff shall not constitute a majority. A member may occupy two positions but may only vote once.

6.2.3 .4. Voting Rules 44

Each regular RRFSS member shall have one vote. Each special RRFSS member shall have one vote. The majority is 51 % or more of the regular and special members present and voting and concurrence between the Radiation Safety Officer and the Reactor Facility Director.

6.2.3.5. Minutes

a. Draft minutes of the previous meeting should be available to regular members at least one week before a regular scheduled meeting.
b. Once approved by the subcommittee, final minutes shall be submitted to level one management for review.

6.2.4. REVIEW FUNCTION The RRFSS shall review:

a. Safety evaluations for (1) changes to procedures, equipment, or systems having safety significance and (2) tests or experiments conducted without NRC approval under provisions of Section 50.59 of 10 CPR.
b. Changes to procedures, equipment, or systems that change the original intent or use, are non-conservative, or those that meet any of the applicable criteria in Section 50.59 of 10 CPR;
c. Proposed tests or experiments that could affect reactivity or result in the uncontrolled release of radioactivity, or those that might meet any of the applicable criteria in Section 50.59 of 10 CPR;
d. Proposed changes in Technical Specifications, the Safety Analysis Report; or other license conditions;
e. Violations of applicable statutes, codes, regulations, orders, technical specifications, license requirements, or of internal procedures or instructions having safety significance;
f. Operating abnormalities having safety significance;
g. Events that have been reported to the NRC; and
h. Audit reports of the reactor facility operations.

6.2.5. AUDIT FUNCTION 45

Audits of reactor facility operations shall be performed under the cognizance of the RRFSS, but in no case by the personnel responsible for the item audited. The audits shall be performed annually, not to exceed 15 months. A report of the findings and recommendations resulting from the audit shall be submitted to the AFRRI Licensee within three months after the report has been received. Audits may be performed by one or more individuals who need not be RRFSS members. These audits shall examine the operating records and the conduct of operations, and shall encompass the following:

a. Conformance of facility operation to the Technical Specifications and the license;
b. Performance, training, and qualifications of the reactor facility staff;
c. Results of all actions taken to correct deficiencies occurring in facility equipment, structures, systems, or methods of operation that affect safety;
d. Facility emergency plan and implementing procedures;
e. Facility Physical Security Plan;
f. Any other area of facility operations considered appropriate by the RRFSS or the AFRRI Licensee; and
g. Reactor Facility ALARA Program. This program may be a section of the total AFRRI program.

6.3. PROCEDURES Written procedures for certain activities shall be approved by the Reactor Facility Director and reviewed by the RRFSS. The procedures shall be adequate to ensure safe operation of the reactor, but shall not preclude the use of independent judgment and action as deemed necessary. Operational procedures shall be used for the following items:

a. Conduct of irradiation and experiments that could affect the operation and safety of the reactor;
b. Surveillance, testing, maintenance, and calibration of instruments, components, and systems involving nuclear safety;
c. Personnel radiation protection consistent with 10 CFR Part 20;
d. Implementation of required plans such as the Physical Security Plan and the Emergency Plan, consistent with restrictions on safeguards information; 46
e. Fuel loading, unloading, and movement within the reactor core; and
f. Reactor startup checklist, standard operations, and securing the facility.

Although substantive changes to the above procedures shall be made only with approval by the Reactor Facility Director, temporary changes to the procedures that do not change their original intent may be made by the Reactor Operations Supervisor. All such temporary changes shall be documented and subsequently reviewed and approved by the Reactor Facility Director.

6.4. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF EXPERIMENTS Before issuance of a reactor authorization, new experiments shall be reviewed for radiological safety and approved by the following:

a. Reactor Facility Director
b. Health Physics Department
c. Reactor and Radiation Facilities Safety Subcommittee (RRFSS)

Prior to its performance, an experiment shall be included under one of the following types of authorizations:

a. Special Reactor Authorization for new experiments or experiments not included in a Routine Reactor Authorization. These experiments shall be performed under the direct supervision of the Reactor Facility Director or designee.
b. Routine Reactor Authorization for approved experiments safely performed at least once. These experiments may be performed at the discretion of the Reactor Facility Director and coordinated with the Health Physics Department, when appropriate.

These authorizations do not require additional RRFSS review.

c. Reactor Parameters Authorization for routine measurements ofreactor parameters, routine core measurements, instrumentation and calibration checks, maintenance, operator training, tours, testing to verify reactor outputs, and other reactor testing procedures. This shall constitute a single authorization. These operations shall be performed under the authorization of the Reactor Facility Director or the Reactor Operations Supervisor.

Substantive(> $0.25) changes to previously approved experiments shall be made only after review by the RRFSS and after approval (in writing) by the Reactor Facility Director or designated alternate to ensure that the change does not impact compliance with TS 3.6, LIMITATIONS ON EXPERIMENTS. Minor changes that do not significantly alter the experiment (<$0.25) may be approved by the Reactor 47

Operations Supervisor. Approved experiments shall be carried out in accordance with established procedures.

48

6.5. REQUIRED ACTIONS 6.5.1. ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN CASE OF SAFETY LIMIT VIOLATION

a. The reactor shall be shut down immediately, and reactor operation shall not be resumed without authorization by the USNRC.
b. The safety limit violation shall be reported to the USNRC, the AFRRI Licensee, and the RRFSS not later than the next working day.
c. A Safety Limit Violation Report shall be prepared. This report shall be reviewed by the RRFSS, and shall describe (1) applicable circumstances preceding the violation, when known, the cause and contributing factors (2) effects of the violation on facility components, structures, or systems, the health and safety of personnel and the public and (3) corrective action taken to prevent or reduce the probability of recurrence ..
d. The Safety Limit Violation Report shall be submitted to the USNRC, the AFRRI Licensee, and the RRFSS within 14 days of the violation.

6.5.2. REPORTABLE OCCURRENCES The types of events listed below shall be reported as soon as possible by telephone and confirmed in writing by facsimile, e-mail, or similar transmission to the USNRC no later than the following working day after confirmation of the event, with a written follow-up report within 14 days.

The report shall include (as a minimum) the circumstances preceding the event, current effects on the facility, and status of corrective action. The report shall contain as much supplemental material as possible to clarify the situation. Supplemental reports may be required to fully describe the final resolution of the occurrence.

a. Operation with any safety system setting less conservative than specified in Section 2.2, Limiting Safety System Setting for Fuel Temperature.
b. Operation in violation of any Limiting Condition for Operation, Section 3, unless prompt remedial action is taken.
c. Malfunction of a required reactor safety system component during operation that could render the system incapable of performing its intended safety function unless the malfunction or condition is caused by maintenance.
d. Any unanticipated or uncontrolled change in reactivity greater than $1.00.
e. An observed inadequacy in the implementation of either administrative or procedural controls, such that the inadequacy causes or could have 49

caused the existence or development of a condition that could result in operation of the reactor in a manner less safe than conditions covered in the Safety Analysis Report.

f. The release of fission products from a fuel element through degradation of the fuel cladding. Possible degradation may be determined through an increase in the background activity level of the reactor pool water.
g. Significant degradation of the reactor coolant boundary (excluding minor leaks).
h. A release of radioactivity that exceeds or could have exceeded the limits allowed by 10 CFR Part 20, or these Technical Specifications.
1. Unscheduled conditions arising from natural or man-made events that, as a direct result of the event, require operation of safety systems or other protective measures required by Technical Specifications.

J. Errors discovered in the transient or accident analyses or in the methods used for such analyses as described in the Safety Analysis Report or in the bases for the Technical Specifications that have or could have permitted reactor operation with a smaller margin of safety than in the erroneous analysis.

k. Performance of structures, systems, or components that requires remedial action or corrective measures to prevent operation in a manner less conservative than assumed in the accident analyses in the Safety Analysis Report or Technical Specifications bases, or discovery during facility life of conditions not specifically considered in the Safety Analysis Report or Technical Specifications that require remedial action or corrective measures to prevent the existence or development of an unsafe condition.

6.5.3. ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN CASE OF REPORTABLE OCCURRENCES

a. Reactor conditions shall be returned to normal, or the reactor shall be shut down. If it is necessary to shut down the reactor to correct the occurrence, operations shall not be resumed unless authorized by the Reactor Facility Director or designated alternate.
b. The occurrence shall be reported to the Reactor Facility Director or designated alternate and to the USNRC.
c. The occurrence shall be reviewed by the RRFSS at its next scheduled meeting.

50

6.6. OPERATING REPORTS In addition to the applicable reporting requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the following reports shall be submitted to USNRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation unless otherwise noted:

a. Startup Report: A summary report of planned startup and pqwer escalation testing shall be submitted following (1) receipt of an operating license; (2) amendment of the license involving a planned increase in power level; (3) installation of fuel that has a different design; and (4) modifications that may have significantly altered the nuclear, thermal, or hydraulic performance of the reactor. The report shall address each of the tests identified in the Safety Analysis Report and shall, in general, include a description of the measured values of the operating conditions or characteristics obtained during the test program and a comparison of these values with design predictions and specifications. Any corrective actions that were required to obtain satisfactory operation shall also be described. Any additional specific details required in license conditions based on other commitments shall be included in this report.

Startup Reports shall be submitted within (1) 90 days following completion of the startup test program, (2) 90 days following resumption or commencement of power operation, or (3) nine months following initial criticality, whichever is earliest. If the Startup Report does not cover all three events (i.e., initial criticality, completion of startup test program, and resumption or commencement of power operation), supplementary reports shall be submitted at least every three months until all three events have been completed.

b. Annual Operating Report: Routine operating reports covering the operation of the reactor during the previous calendar year shall be submitted by March 31 of each year. The Annual Operating Report shall provide a comprehensive summary of the operating experience having safety significance during the year, even though some repetition of previously reported information may be involved. References in the Annual Operating Report to previously submitted reports shall be clear.

Each Annual Operating Report shall include:

1. A brief narrative summary of:
a. Changes in facility design, performance characteristics, and operating procedures related to reactor safety that occurred during the reporting period;
b. Results of surveillance test and inspections; 51
2. A tabulation showing the energy generated by the reactor on a monthly basis, the cumulative total energy since initial criticality, and the number of pulses greater than $2.00;
3. List of the unscheduled shutdowns for which corrective was required to ensure safe operation of the reactor, including the reasons and the corrective actions taken;
4. Discussion of the major safety-significant corrective and/or preventive maintenance performed during the period, including the effects (if any) on the safe operation of the reactor, and the reasons for the corrective maintenance required;
5. A brief description of:
a. Each change to the facility to the extent that it changes a description of the facility in the Safety Analysis Report;
b. Changes to the procedures as described in the Safety Analysis Report;
c. Any new experiments or tests performed during the reporting period that is not encompassed in the Safety Analysis Report;
6. A summary of the safety evaluation made for each change, test, or experiment not submitted for Commission approval pursuant to Section 50.59 of 10 CFR Part 50. The summary shall show the reason leading to the conclusion that the criteria in paragraph (c)(2) of that Section were not met and that no change to the Technical Specifications was required;
7. A summary of the nature and amount of radioactive effluents released or discharged to the environs beyond the effective control of the licensee as determined at or prior to the point of such release or discharge. If the estimated average release after dilution or diffusion is less than 25% of the concentration allowed, a statement to this effect is sufficient.
a. Liquid Waste (summarized on a monthly basis)
1. Radioactivity discharged during the reporting period:

Total radioactivity released (in curies);

Concentration limits used and isotopic composition for fission and activation products Total radioactivity of each nuclide released during the reporting period and, based on representative isotopic analysis, average concentration at point of release during the reporting period; 52

11. Total volume of effluent water (including diluents) during periods of release;
b. Gaseous Waste (summarized on a quarterly basis)

Radioactivity discharged during the reporting period for:

Argon-41; Particulates with half-lives greater than eight days;

c. Solid Waste (summarized on a quarterly basis)

Total cubic feet and combined activity in curies of materials in solid form disposed of under license R-84;

8. A description of the results of any environmental radiological surveys performed outside the facility;
9. A list of exposures greater than 25% of the allowed I 0 CFR Part 20 limit received by reactor personnel or visitors to the reactor facility;
c. Other Reports: A report shall be submitted to the USNRC within 30 days describing:

I. Any permanent change of either the AFRRI Licensee or the Reactor Facility Director; or

2. Significant changes in the transient or accident analysis described in the SAR.

53

6.7. RECORDS

6. 7.1 RECORDS THAT SHALL BE RETAINED FOR A PERIOD OF AT LEAST FIVE YEARS
a. Normal reactor operations;
b. Principal maintenance operations;
c. Reportable occurrences;
d. Surveillance activities required by Technical Specifications;
e. Reactor facility radiation and contamination surveys;
f. Experiments performed with the reactor;
g. Changes to operating procedures;
h. Fuel inventories and fuel transfers;
i. Records of reviews performed for changes made to procedures or equipment, or reviews of tests and experiments pursuant to Section 50.59 of 10 CFR Part 50; and
j. Records of meetings of the RRFSS.

6.7.2. RECORDS TO BE RETAINED FOR AT LEAST ONE CERTIFICATION CYCLE Records of retraining and requalification of certified reactor operators and senior reactor operators shall be retained at all times the individual is employed or until the certification is renewed.

6.7.3. RECORDS TO BE RETAINED FOR THE LIFE OF THE FACILITY

a. Gaseous and liquid radioactive effluents released to the environs;
b. Appropriate offsite environmental monitoring surveys;
c. Radiation exposures for all reactor personnel monitored; and
d. Drawings of the reactor facility.

54

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16232A167&oldid=2443065"