Text

Calculation PRDC-0015, Rev. 2, Addendum A03, Division 2,125 Vdc System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing Calculation
	ML15316A513
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	09/15/2011
From:	Gaffney D; FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	L-15-257 PRDC-0015, Rev 2, Add A03
	Download: ML15316A513 (34)
	v • d • e

CALCULATION ADDENDUM NOP-CC-3002-02 Rev. 05 CALCULATION NO.

PRDC-0015 INITIATING DOCUMENT CR 08-39315 and 08-44299 CALCULATION REV.

2 ADDENDUM NO.

A3 D

BV1 1

D BV2 1

PY TITLE/

SUBJECT:

(MUST MATCH ORIGINAL CALCULATION TITLE (SUBJECT))

Division 2,125 VDC System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing calculation Classification Tier 1 Calculation Safety-Related/Augmented Quality Nonsafety-Related Open Assumptions?

Yes No If Yes, Enter Tracking Number Initiating Document Calc PRDC-0014, Rev 4 (Perry & Davis-Besse Only)

Referenced In Atlas?

SYes D No (Perry Only)

Referenced In USAR Validation Database Yes El No Computer Program(S)

Program Name Version / Revision Category Status Description DCSDM 3.0 B

Active Direct Current System Database Module Originator (Print, Sign & Date)

Darral E.

Reviewer/Design VerifierCPrinf, RyanM.Briggs//^

&Date)

ApproverfPrint Sign & Date)^\\ UIU John P. Maloneyi/-

OBJECTIVE OR PURPOSE OF ADDENDUM:

This Addendum, A3 is created to re-size the Division 2 batteries based on the minimum acceptable voltage for all DC components and the use of Fluke 45, Multimeters during SVI testing.

This addendum will supersede Addendum A2.

Addendum A2 did not re-size the batteries based on the minimum acceptable voltage for all DC components.

This issue has been discussed in previous CRs 08-39315 and 08-44299 and there are no issues related to the operability of Division 2 batteries and the connected components.

SCOPE OF ADDENDUM:

The minimum required battery terminal voltage for all the DC components to operate properly is 111.8 VDC, reference Attachment 1.

This equates to 111.8 / 60 = 1.863 volts per cell (Division 2 batteries have 60 cells).

The final discharge voltage for the Division 2 batteries is 111.8 volts (1.863 volts per cell) compared to previous final discharge voltage of 105 volts (1.75 volts per cell).

This Addendum, A3 has re-sized the Division 3 battery based on 1.863 vpc as the final discharged voltage.

LIST NEW DOCUMENTS TO BE ADDED TO THE DOCUMENT INDEX (DIN).

DIN No.

DocumentNumber/TitleRevision,Edition,Date Reference D

Input

Output

D

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS OF ADDENDUM:, created by the DCSDM software, shows the battery sizing results.

Based on 1.863 volts/cell, 3.40 or more positive plates are required and the battery margin is 105.88%.

The Division 2 batteries have 7 positive plates.

Thus, there was no impact on the calculation results and conclusion by this revision.

LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS CREATED BY ADDENDUM:

None

ftrstEneroy CALCULATION ADDENDUM NOP-CC-3002-02 Rev. 05 CALCULATION NO.

PRDC-0015 INITIATING DOCUMENT CR 08-39315 and 08-44299 CALCULATION REV.

2 ADDENDUM NO.

A3 IMPACT OF ADDENDUM ON OUTPUT DOCUMENTS:

Reviewed all the output documents and none are impacted.

DESCRIBE WHERE THE ADDENDUM WILL BE EVALUATED FOR 10CFR50.59 APPLICABILITY:

Regulatory Applicability Determination (RAD) and 10 CFR50.59 Screen 09-04620.

LIST SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: (Include total number of pages)

PIS (7 Pages), DIEs (9 Pages), PVR (1 Page), Calc Review Checklist (3 Pages)

LIST ATTACHMENTS: (Include total number of pages)

(1 Page), Attachment 2 (7 Pages). Attachment 3 (1 Page). Attachment 4 (1 Page) of Calculation PRDC-0015, R/2, A 3 1

7 10 11 Device Node/Panal Sw#

Time Step Load Step Battery Voltage Node Voltage Device Voltage Required Voltage Batt. - Node Drop Node - Load Drop Mln Required Battery Voltage SPCHGM-1-EH1201-F22 13 117.669 115 49 85.99 80 2 179 29.5 111.679 SPCHGM-1-EH1212-F22 13 27 118056 11591 82.25 80 2 146 33 66 115 806 SOL-1E51-F425 ED1B08, Sw#1 SOL-1-C11-1F110B ED1B08, Sw#2 W

W 117669 116.81 114.9 100 0859 1-7 117.669 116.81 191 102 769 112.83 105 0 859 3.98 109 839 RLY-1E12-K3B ED1B08. Sw#5 W

1-7 117.669 116.81 109.81 100 0.659 107 859 RLY-1B21-K6B/K7B/K8B ED1B08. Sw#7 W

1-7 117.669 116 81 113.89 100 0 859 2.92 103.779 RLY-1E12-K110B10.12 ED1B08, Sw#8 W

1-7 117.669 116 81 112.12 100 0 859 469 105 549 ARI-1C11F160B/F162D/F162B/F1 63B ED1B08, Sw#14 W

1-6 117.669 116.357 95 89 90 1312 20.467 111.779 RLY-1R43-TD1A ED1B06. Sw#7 117.669 116 764 108.33 100 0.905 8434 109339 RLY-1R43-TD1B ED1B06, Sw#8 W

1-7 117.669 116.764 108.04 100 0905 8 724 109.629 CNTCTR-K1 ED1B06. Sw#9 W

117.669 116206 107.48 100 1.463 8.726 110.189 RLY-2P47-K2LUK3/K95 ED1B06, Sw#12 W

1-7 117669 116.764 114.5 100 0905 2.264 103169 PWRSUP-1C95-RACK 1,2 ED1B06, Sw#15 W

1-7 117.669 116 764 110.07 100 0905 6 694 107 599 Details of the Spreadsheet

1) Breaker EH1212 opens and remain open until the end of 2 hrs load cyde It closes at 1 HR 59 MIN and performs its safety function After it closes, the SPCHGM will try to charge.

The reason for charging is to get ready for next reclose which is beyond the 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months load cyde and is not a design basis requirement Therefore, calculation of SPCHGM voltage at 1 HR 59 MIN is not a design basis requirement and is not determined in this spreadsheet.

2) Column 1

- Devices in each switch that has lowest margin, obtained from Attachment L1, PRDC-0015, R/2 SPCHGM that are operated during an accident condition were only considered.

3) Column 2 -

Node numbers from PRDC-0015, R/2, Attachment B for SPCHGM.

For remaining devices that has minimum device voltage for each switch in ED1B06 and ED1B08 panels from Attachment

4) Column 3 - Calculation Time Step from PRDC-0015, R/2.

"W" indicates time step with worst case minimum voltage was used.

5) Column 4 - Applicable SVI Load Step

6) Column 5 - Battery voltage obtained from Attachment F of PRDC-0015, R/2.

7) Column 6 - Node voltage obtained from Attachment B of PRDC-0015, R/2

8) Column 7 - Device voltage for SPCHGM is from Attachment I and B.

Device voltages for the remaining devices are from Attachment L1 of PRDC-0015, R/2.

9) Column 8 - Required voltage for SPCHGM is from Section 5 2 of PRDC-0015, R/2 based on site results For all other devices from Attachment L1

10) Column 9 - Voltage drop between Battery and the Node (Column 5 - Column 6).

11) Column 10 - Voltage drop between Node and the device (Column 6 - Column 7)

12) Column 11

- Minimum Required Battery Voltage at the device is Column 8 + Column 9 + Column 10 Therefore, considering diagnostic instrument accuracy the minimum required voltage is 111 779 + 0.045 = 111 824 *111.8 volts for SVI Testing.

Note. Diagnostic instrument accuracy is obtained from Attachment T of PRDC-0014, R/4 for the Fluke 45.

Per PRDC-0014, R/4, the Fluke 45 is commonly used for measuring voltage and is more accurate than Fluke 77.

Fluke 45 has an M&TE accuracy error of 0.045 V.

Fluke 77 has a M&TE accuracy error of Pgiofi

Battery Sizing Results Generation Date: 09/09/2011 09:04 am Battery:

DIV2 Scenario ID Description DBE2 Unit 1

Div. 2 Design Basis Event (LOOP / LOCA).

Required Plates 3.40 Actual Plates 7

Margin 105.88%

Comments CalcPRDC-0015,R/2,A3 Pg 1 of 7 Battery Data:

Minimum Electrolyte Temperature (degF):

Cell Manufacturer:

Cell Type:

3attery Float Voltage:

3attery Nominal Voltage:

3attery Minimum Volts per Cell:

Mumber of Cells:

1 minute Rating (ADC):

design Margin:

Aging Factor:

70 Exide GN-15(GC-15) 135 125 1.863 60 133.38 1.15 1.25 First Energy / Perry Nuclear Power Plant Calc No. PRDC-015 Rev. 2 DCSDM Version 3.0 Attachment HDBE2 of Scenario DBE2 Page HDBE2 2 of HDBE2 2

Cell Sizing Worksheet Generation Date: 09/09/2011 09:04 am CalcPRDC-0015, R/2, A 3 Pg2of7 Battery:

DIV2 Lowest Expected Electrolyte Temp:

70 F Minimum Cell Voltage:

1.86 VPC Cell Mfg:

Cell Type:

Exide GN-15(GC-1S)

Sized By:

(D Period (2)

Load (amperes)

(3)

Change In Load (amperes)

(4)

Duration of Period (minutes)

(5)

Time to End of Section (minutes)

(6)

Capacity At T Min Rate Amps/Pos (RT)

(7)

Required Section Size Positive Plates Section 1

- First 1

Periods Only - If A2 is greater than A1, go to Section A2.

A1= 201.4 A1 -A0 = 201.4 T=M1

+...+ M1 =

1 94.48 2.13 Sec 1 Total:

2.13 Section 3

- First 3 Periods Only If A4 is greater than A3, go to Section A4.

1 2

3 A1 =201.4 A2 = 99.36 A3 = 120.32 A1 A2 A3

-A0 = 201.4

-A1 =-102.04

- A2 = 20.96 M1

=

M2 =

M3 =

1 1

1 T = M1

+...+ M3 = 3 T = M2 +...+ M3 = 2 T = M3 +...+ M3 =

1 93.40 93.98 94.48 2.16

-1.09 0.22 Sec 3 Total:

1.29 Section 5 - First 5 Periods Only -

If A6 is greater than A5, go to Section A6.

1 2

3 4

5 A1 =201.4 A2 = 99.36 A3 = 120.32 A4 = 99.36 A5 = 120.33 A1-A0 = 201.4 A2-A1 =-102.04 A3 - A2 = 20.96 A4 - A3 = -20.96 A5 - A4 = 20.97 M1 =1 M2=1 M3 =

1 M4 = 7 M5=1 T = M1

+.

T = M2 +.

T = M3 +.

T = M4 +.

T = M5 +.

..+ M5 = 11

..+ M5 = 10

..+ M5 = 9

..+ M5 = 8

..+ M5 =

1 88.64 89.05 89.52 90.05 94.48 2.27

-1.15 0.23

-0.23 0.22 Sec 5 Total:

1.34 Section 8 - First 8 Periods Only - If A9 is greater than A8, go to Section A9.

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 8

A1 =201.4 A2 = 99.36 A3 = 120.32 A4 = 99.36 A5 = 120.33 A6 = 99.42 A7 = 99.53 A8= 120.41 A1

- A0 = 201.4 A2-A1 =-102.04 A3 - A2 = 20.96 A4 - A3 = -20.96 A5 - A4 = 20.97 A6 - A5 = -20.92 A7-A6 = 0.11 A8 - A7 = 20.88 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8

= 1

=

1

=

1

= 7

=

1

= 49

= 59

=

1 T = M1

+.

T = M2 +.

T = M3 +.

T = M4+.

T = M5 +.

T = M6 +.

T = M7 +.

T = M8 +.

..+ M8 = 120

..+ M8 = 119

..+ M8= 118

..+ M8 = 117

..+ M8=110

..+ M8 = 109

..+ M8 = 60

..+ M8 = 1 48.70 48.92 49.14 49.36 50.97 51.21 65.80 94.48 4.14

-2.09 0.43

-0.42 0.41

-0.41 0.00 0.22 Sec 8 Total:

2.28 Maximum Section Size (8) 2.28 + Random Section Size (9) 0.00 = Unconnected Size * (US) (10) 2.28 US (11) 2.28 x Temp. Corr. (12) 1.040 x Design Margin (13) 1.15 x Aging Factor (14) 1.25 = (15) 3.41 When the cell size (15) is greater than the standard cell size, the next larger cell Is required.

Required cell size (16) 4 Positive Plates.

Therefore cell (177

~Z 3

yp is required.

First Energy/ Perry Nuclear Power Plant Calc No. PRDC-015 Rev. 2 DCSDM Version 3.0 Attachment RDBE2 Page RDBE2 2 of RDBE2 2

Voltage Profile Generation Date: 09/09/20111 Battery:

DIV2 Load (amperes)

Corrected Load (amps) 201.40 99.36 120.32 99.36 99.36 99.36 99.36 99.36 99.36 99.36 120.33 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.'42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 261.83 129.17 156.42 129.17 129.17 129.17 129.17 129.17 129.17 129.17 156.43 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 19:04 am Time (min.)

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 AMP-HRS Removed 4.36 6.52 9.12 11.28 13.43 15.58 17.74 19.89 22.04 24.19 26.80 28.96 31.11 33.26 35.42 37.57 39.73 41.88 44.03 46.19 48 34 50.50 52.65 54.80 56.96 59.11 61.27 63.42 65.57 67.73 69.88 72.04 74.19 76.34 78.50 80.65 82.81 84.96 87.11 89.27 91.42 AMP-HR/ Pos Pit 0.62 0.93 1.30 1.61 1.92 2.23 2.53 2.84 3.15 3.46 3.83 4.14 4.44 4.75 5.06 5.37 5.68 5.98 6.29 6.60 6.91 7.21 7.52 7.83 8.14 8.44 8.75 9.06 9.37 9.68 9.98 10.29 10.60 10.91 11.21 11.52 11.83 12.14 12.44 12.75 13.06 AMPS/ Pos Pit 37.40 18.45 22.35 18.45 18.45 18.45 18.45 18.45 18.45 18.45 22.35 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 CalcPRDC-0015,R/2,A3 Pg 3 of 7 Cell Voltage (Volts)

Terminal Voltage (Volts) 1.961 1.995 1.987 1.994 1.993 1.992 1.990 1.990 1.989 1.990 1.983 1.989 1.989 1.988 1.988 1.987 1.987 1.986 1.986 1.986 1.985 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.985

1.985 1.985 1.986 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 117.67 119.68 119.24 119.62 119.58 119.53 119.43 119.38 119.34 119.37 118.96 119.35 119.33 119.29 119.27 119.24 119.22 119.19 119.16 119.14 119.09 119.07 119.06 119.04 119.04 119.03 119.03 119.03 119.04 119.05 119.06 119.07 119.09 119.11 119.14 119.03 119.03 119.03 119.03 119.03 119.03

' Denotes Extrapolated Data.

Please Verify the Battery Characteristics Library.

First Energy / Perry Nuclear Power Plant DCSDM Version 3.0 Attachment PDBE2 Page PDBE2 2 of PDBE2 4

Calc No. PRDC-015 Rev. 2

Voltage Profile Generation Date: 09/09/2011 Battery:

DIV2 Load (amperes)

I 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.42 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 09:04 am Corrected Load Time (min.)

(amps) 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.24 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129 38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 AMP-HRS Removed 93.58 95.73 97.88 100.04 102.19 104.35 106.50 108.65 110.81 112.96 115.12 117.27 119.43 121.58 123.73 125.89 128.04 130.20 132.35 134.51 136.66 138.82 140.97 143.13 145.29 147.44 149.60 151.76 153.91 156.07 158.23 160.38 162.54 164.69 166.85 169.01 171.16 173.32 175.48 177.63 179.79 AMP-HR/ Pos Pit 13.37 13.68 13.98 14.29 14.60 14.91 15.21 15.52 15.83 16.14 16.45 16.75 17.06 17.37 17.68 17.98 18.29 18.60 18.91 19.22 19.52 19.83 20.14 20.45 20.76 21.06 21.37 21.68 21.99 22.30 22.60 22.91 23.22 23.53 23.84 24.14 24.45 24.76 25.07 25.38 25.68 AMPS/ Pos Pit 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46 18.46

18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 CalcPRDC-0015,R/2,A3 Pg4of7 Cell Voltage (Volts)

Terminal Voltage (Volts) 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.983 1.983 1.983 1.983 1.983 1.983 1.982 1.982 1.981 1.981 1.981 1.981 1.980 1.979 1.979 1.979 1.979 1.979 1.979 1.979 1.979 1.978 1.978 119.03 119.04 119.04 119.04 119.04 119.05 119.05 119.05 119.03 119.03 119.03 119.06 119.05 119.05 119.04 119.03 119.02 119.02 119.01 118.99 118.98 118.97 118.96 118.95 118.94 118.93 118.88 118.86 118.85 118.84 118.82 118.76 118.76 118.75 118.74 118.73 118.72 118.72 118.71 118.71 118.70

' Denotes Extrapolated Data.

Please Verify the Battery Characteristics Library.

First Energy / Perry Nuclear Power Plant DCSDM Version 3.0 Attachment PDBE2 Page PDBE2 3 of PDBE2 4

Calc No. PRDC-015 Rev. 2

Voltage Profile Generation Date: 09/09/2011 Battery:

DIV2 Load (amperes)

I 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 99.53 120.41 Corrected Loac (amps) 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 129.38 156.53 09:04 am 1

Time (min.)

83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 AMP-HRS Removed 181.95 184.10 186.26 188.42 190.57 192.73 194.88 197.04 199.20 201.35 203.51 205.67 207.82 209.98 212.14 214.29 216.45 218.60 220.76 222.92 225.07 227.23 229.39 231.54 233.70 235.86 238.01 240.17 242.32 244.48 246.64 248.79 250.95 253.11 255.26 257.42 259.58 262.18 AMP-HR/ Pos Pit 25.99 26.30 26.61 26.92 27.22 27.53 27.84 28.15 28.46 28.76 29.07 29.38 29.69 30.00 30.31 30.61 30.92 31.23 31.54 31.85 32.15 32.46 32.77 33.08 33.39 33.69 34.00 34.31 34.62 34.93 35.23 35.54 35.85 36.16 36.47 36.77 37.08 37.45 AMPS/ Pos Pit 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 18.48 22.36 CalcPRDC-0015,R/2,A3 Pg5of7 Cell Voltage (Volts) 1.978 1.978 1.978 1.978 1.978 1.978 1.978 1.978 1.978 1.979 1.979 1.979 1.979 1.979 1.979 1.979 1.979 1.979 1.979 1.979 1.979 1.978 1.978 1.978 1.978 1.978 1.978 1.977 1.977 1.977 1.977 1.977 1.976 1.976 1.976 1.976 1.975 1.968 Terminal Voltage (Volts) 118.69 118.69 118.68 118.68 118.68 118.67 118.67 118.67 118.66 118.74 118.74 118.74 118.74 118.74 118.74 118.73 118.73 118.73 118.72 118.72 118.71 118.70 118.70 118.69 118.68 118.67 118.66 118.65 116.64 118.63 118.60 118.59 118.58 118.56 118.55 118.53 118.52 118.06

- ' Denotes Extrapolated Data.

Please Verify the Battery Characteristics Library.

Rrst Energy / Perry Nuclear Power Plant DCSDM Version 3.0 Attachment PDBE2 Page PDBE2 4 of PDBE2 4

Calc No. PRDC-015 Rev. 2 VOLTAGE PROFILE

% °" c"°°15' "*A 3 140-Battery Name:

div2 Generation Date: 09/09/2011 09:04 am 135--i V

130-O L

T A

G E

125-1 120-115-0 24 48 72 Time (Minutes) 96 120 First Energy / Perry Nuclear Power Plant Calc No. PRDC-015 Rev. 2 DCSDM Version 3.0 Attachment QDBE2 Page QDBE2 2ofQDBE2 2

LOAD PROFILE 225-Battery Name:

DIV2 CaIcPRDC-0015,R/2,A3 Pg7of7 Generation Date: 09/09/2011 09:04 am 195-A 165-j M

P E

R E

S 135-75 24 48 72 Time (Minutes) 96 120 First Energy / Perry Nuclear Power Plant Calc No. PRDC-015 Rev. 2 DCSDM Version 3.0 Attachment ODBE2 Page ODBE2 2 of ODBE2 2

Page 6 of 20 CALCULATION COMPUTATION NOP-CC-3002-01 Rev. 03 CALCULATION NO.:

PRDC-0015 REVISION: 2 4.4.2 The battery sizing calculation is performed using a design margin of 15%, aging margin of 25%

and applying temperature correction factor as recommended in IEEE Std 485.

4.4.3 The battery voltage analysis is performed using aging margin of 25% and applying temperature correction factor as recommended in IEEE Std 485 and with no design margin because of the following:

IEEE Std. 485-1997, Section 6.22 states "It is prudent to provide a capacity margin to allow for unforeseen additions to the dc system and less than optimum operating conditions of the battery due to improper maintenance, recent discharge, or ambient temperatures lower than anticipated, or a combination of these factors.

Design change process at Perry is controlled per site Engineering Change procedure.

Addition of new DC load will be reviewed and appropriate action including revision to battery capability calculation will be performed as needed.

Battery cell parameters (electrolyte level, specific gravity and float voltage) are checked every 7 days.

Battery cells, cell plates, connections, and rack inspection is performed every 92 days.

Each battery has strict Technical Specification surveillance test requirements.

Acceptance criteria of these tests must be met to continue battery operation.

Therefore, it is highly unlikely that the.

batteries will have less than optimum operating conditipn of battery due to improper maintenance.

To ensure that the batteries are fully charged and have their full capacity after discharge test, the following sequential steps are taken:

Place the battery on float charge for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months (typical), place the battery on equalizing charge for 5-7 days (typical), place the battery back on float charge for 3 days (typical), perform weekly Category A limit check of cell parameters.

After satisfactory meeting acceptance criteria of the tests, the battery is returned to service.

It should be noted that unlike other plants, Perry has two sets of batteries (Unit 1 & 2) to serve Unit 1 DC bus.

Therefore, after discharge test, there is adequate time to restore the discharged battery while the second battery supply the load.

Equalizing voltage can also be increased without affecting the Unit 1 DC bus due to presence of the second battery.

Therefore, it is highly unlikely that the batteries will have less than optimum operating condition of battery due to recent discharge test Battery cell average electrolyte temperature is monitored every 92 days per Technical Specification surveillance requirement and the acceptance criteria is £ 72°F.

The battery room average temperature is 75°F per drawing B-022-010.

Also, each battery room has temperature monitoring device (OM23N0120/OM23K0226, Drg 208-115-201) that sends alarm to the control room when the room temperature falls below the low set point of 73°F.

This calculation conservatively uses temperature correction factor based on 71 °F.

Based on the above discussion, use of no design margin in the voltage analyse is not a concern.

4.4.4 BATTERY CHARGER SIZING CONDITION OF ANALYSIS The charger shall be capable of recharging a fully discharged battery within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months while supplying the maximum continuous load of that battery.

A fully discharged battery is a battery where the cells are discharged to(j*/6 volte'por'c'eira)the 2-hour discharge rate.

H 4.5 BATTERY SIZING, LOAD FLOW, & VOLTAGE DROP ETHODOLOGY/CALCULATION The system battery sizing, load flow and voltage drop analysis will be performed using a combination of the following software programs: DCSDM Version 3.0 and Microsoft Excel.

4.6.1 BATTERY SIZING CALCULATION to PRDC-0015. Rev./2. A03 4.6.4 USAR TABLE 8.3.7 LOAD PROFILE USAR Table 8.3-7 provides the DC load profile for Division 2 battery for the design basis accident scenario.

Service tests (per SVIs) for the batteries are performed utilizing the load profile from Table 8.3-7.

The Battery load profile in this Addendum has both the current and the voltage information and is shown in Attachment 2 of this Addendum.

The current at different nodes is obtained from Attachment G of the calculation.

The voltage is based on worst case minimum acceptable voltage of the components and adding the cable drop between the components and the battery. See of Addendum A01 for detail evaluation.

These currents and voltages were increased to account for measuring instrument error of 0.045 volts [Typical Fluke Model 45 error is as documented in Attachment 1 of this Addendum.

The load profile below is per IEEE Std. 450-1995, Paragraph 6.6 for Service Tests which states that the test should not be corrected for temperature or age, if the battery was sized in accordance with IEEE Std 485-1983 that already accounts for margin for age and temperature.

The batteries are sized per above referenced IEEE Std. for discharge voltage of 111.8 volts in this calculation.

To support this load profile, the battery sizing was recalculated per above IEEE Std. for discharge voltage of 1.863 volts/cell(111.8 battery volts) accounting for aging and temperature correction and found to have adequate margin. of this Addendum shows the battery sizing worksheet for Division 2 battery using the 1.863 volts per cell discharge curve.

The revised load profile is as follows:

Period 1

is - 0 to Imin > Duration 1 rnin > 210 amp and voltage is £ 113 volts Period 2 is -

1 to 2 rnin -> Duration 1

rnin -> 105 amp and voltage is a 113 volts Period 3 is - 2 to 3 min ->>.Duration 1

rnin -> 125 amp and voltage is *113 volts Period 4 is - 3 to 10 rnin ^Duration 7 min -* 105 amp and voltage is £ 113 volts Period 5 is -10 to 11 min -^.Duration 1 min -125 amp and voltage is a113 volts Period 6 is-11 to 119 rnin.Duration 108 rnin > 105 amp and voltage is a 113 volts Period 7 is - 119 to 120 rnin ->Duration 1 rnin -125 amp and voltage is a 116.5 volts CHANGES FOR THIS ADDENDUM ARE SHOWN BOLD

DESIGN INTERFACE

SUMMARY

NOP-CC-2004-09 Calculation No.

Rev. No 0

Page 1 of 8 PRDC-0015, R/2, A 3 2

BVX BV2

[J PY OB Chemistry - Environmental [6]

DIE ISSUED SMA

1.2 2.1 6.3 6.11 General Impacts Misc Mechanical Interfaces Plant Controls

- Human Factors Chemical / Environmental NOTE: All fields marked with an astensk are mandatory.

Chemistry - Plant Chemistry [28]

DIE ISSUED SMA I

I 1 2 General Impacts NOTE:

All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Design Eng - Configuration Control [19]

DIE ISSUED SMA 1.2 General Impacts NOTE: All fields marked with an astensk are mandatory.

Design Eng - Elec / I&C, Misc Electrical [20]

DIE ISSUED SMA

1.2 2.1 3.1 General Impacts Misc Mechanical Interfaces Misc Electrical Interfaces i

I I""]

6.1 FIRE Protection / Safe Shutdown NOTE:

All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory Design Eng

- Elec / I&C, Misc I&C [51]

DIE ISSUED SHA

1 2

General Impacts 2.1 Misc Mechanical Interfaces 4.1 Misc I&C Interfaces 6.3 Plant Controls - Human Factors NOTE:

All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Design Eng - Elec / I&C, Security Systems [81]

DIE ISSUED SMA

rr DESIGN INTERFACE

SUMMARY

NOP-CC-2004-09 Page 2 of 8 Calculation No.

PRDC-0015, R/2, A 3 2

Rev. No 0

rr BVl BV2 PY I X I

DB 1.1 Mandatory DIEs, Program & Procedure Interfaces

ii iT NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Design Eng

Elec / I&C, Safe Shutdown [52]

DIE ISSUED

SMA 1.1 1.2 3.1 6.1 6.9 Mandatory DIEs, Program & Procedure Interfaces General Impacts Misc Electrical Interfaces FIRE Protection / Safe Shutdown Reactivity Ctrl, Accident, & Core Reload Analysis NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Design Eng - Engineering Analysis, Misc. [1]

DIE ISSUED SMA 1.2

2.1 5.3 6.2 6.3 6.8 6.9 General Impacts Misc Mechanical Interfaces Materials Rx Containment Bldg & Drywell Plant Controls - Human Factors Internal Missile Hazards Reactivity Ctrl, Accident, & Core Reload Analysis NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Design Eng - Engineering Analysis, PSA [2]

DIE ISSUED SMA l

l 6 5 PSA - Probabilistic Safety Assessment NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory Design Eng, Mech / Structural - Buildings & Struct [67]

DIE ISSUED SMA 1.2 General Impacts NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Design Eng, Mech / Structural - Misc. Mechanical [21]

DIE ISSUED SMA

1.2 General Impacts

Page 3 of 8 DESIGN INTERFACE

SUMMARY

oonrn e

Calculation No.

PRDC-0015, R/2, A 3 2

NOP-CC-2004-09 Rev. No 0

D BV2 BV1 BV2 PY X

DB II 2.1 Misc Mechanical Interfaces 5.3 Materials l

l 6.2 Rx Containment Bldg & Drywell

[~]

6.7 NSSS Design Basis NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Design Eng, Mech / Structural - Misc. Structural [60]

DIE ISSUED SNA I

I 1.2 General Impacts rn 2.1 Misc Mechanical Interfaces l

l 5.1 Misc Structural Interfaces II 5 2 Seismic Considerations l

l 6.2 Rx Containment Bldg & Drywell NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Design Eng, Mech / Structural - Seismic [65]

DIE ISSUED SMA I""]

3.1 Misc Electrical Interfaces J~J 5.2 Seismic Considerations NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Emergency Response [9]

DIE ISSUED SMA l

l 1.2 General Impacts NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Industrial Safety [18]

DIE ISSUED SMA I

I 1.2 General Impacts NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Maintenance - Procedures [40]

DIE ISSUED SMA l x l

1 1

'Mandatory DIEs, Program & Procedure Interfaces NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

FirstEnergv TJ DESIGN INTERFACE

SUMMARY

NOP-CC-2004-09 TT Calculation No.

Rev. No 0

Page 4 of 8 PRDC-001S, R/2, A 3 2

TT BVl BV2 py I x I

DB Maintenance - Support Programs [48]

DIE ISSUED SMA j

l 1.2 General Impacts NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Maintenance - Work Planning [33]

DIE ISSUED SMA l

I 1.1 "Mandatory DIEs, Program & Procedure Interfaces l

l 1.2 General Impacts NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Operations - Unit 1 [5]

DIE ISSUED SMA I

I 5.2

6.3 6.9 General Impacts Misc Mechanical Interfaces Seismic Considerations Plant Controls

- Human Factors Reactivity Ctrl, Accident, & Core Reload Analysis NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Operations Services

Emergency Response Squad [53]

DIE ISSUED SMA l

l 1 2 General Impacts NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Operations Services - Fire Marshal [54]

DIE ISSUED SMA

n i.i 1.2 2.1 6.1 Mandatory OIEs, Program & Procedure Interfaces General Impacts Misc Mechanical Interfaces FIRE Protection / Safe Shutdown NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Operations Services - Procedures [30]

DIE ISSUED SMA

1.1 "Mandatory DIEs, Program & Procedure Interfaces

rr DESIGN INTERFACE

SUMMARY

NOP-CC-2004-09 rr Page 5 of 8 Calculation No.

PRDC-O015, R/2, A 3 2

Rev. No 0

TT BVl BV2 PY X

DB 1.2 General Impacts NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Operations Services - Radwaste [111]

DIE ISSUED SMA 6.9 Reactivity Ctrl, Accident, & Core Reload Analysis NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Plant & Equip Reliability Eng - Cyber Security [76]

DIE ISSUED SMA

1.2 General Impacts 6.3 Plant Controls - Human Factors NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Plant & Equip Reliability Eng - Reactor Eng [24]

DIE ISSUED SMA l

l 1.2 General Impacts l

l 2.1 Misc Mechanical Interfaces 6 9 Reactivity Ctrl, Accident, & Core Reload Analysis NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Plant & Equip Reliability Eng [22]

DIE ISSUED SMA

1.1

'Mandatory DIEs, Program & Procedure Interfaces 1.2 General Impacts 2.1 Misc Mechanical Interfaces NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Plant & Equip Reliability Engr - E & IC [110]

DIE ISSUED SMA I

I 1.2 General Impacts NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Project Management - Refueling Engineering [77]

DIE ISSUED SMA l

l 6.10 Refueling Equipment & Rx Assembly NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

DESIGN INTERFACE

SUMMARY

NOP-CC-2004-09 Page 6 of 8 Calculation No.

PRDC-0015, R/2, A 3 2

Rev. No 0

BVl

[J BV2

[J PY DB Radiation Protection [7]

I DIE ISSUED SMA D

1.2 6.6 General Impacts Radiation Protection

- ALARA NOTE:

All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Site Protection

- Operations [42]

DIE ISSUED SMA

1.1

'Mandatory DIEs, Program & Procedure Interfaces 1.2 General Impacts 6.6 Radiation Protection

- ALARA NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Tech Svcs Eng, Eng Programs - Appendix J [59]

DIE ISSUED SMA

[""I 3.1 Misc Electrical Interfaces I

I 6.2 Rx Containment Bldg & Drywell NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Tech Svcs Eng, Eng Programs - EQ [55]

DIE ISSUED SMA I

I 1.2 General Impacts rl 2.1 Misc Mechanical Interfaces Q]

3.1 Misc Electrical Interfaces NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Tech Svcs Eng, Eng Programs - FAC [80]

DIE ISSUED SMA 2.1 Misc Mechanical Interfaces NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Tech Svcs Eng, Eng Programs - ISI [56]

DIE ISSUED SMA

1.2 General Impacts 2.1 Misc Mechanical Interfaces NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

fil DESIGN INTERFACE

SUMMARY

NOP-CC-2004-09 BV1 BV2 Page 7 of 8 Calculation No.

PRDC-0015, R/2,1 2

Rev. No 0

OB Tech Svcs Eng, Eng Programs - 1ST, NDE, Boric Acid [57]

DIE ISSUED SMA l

l 1.2 General Impacts 2

1 Misc Mechanical Interfaces NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Tech Svcs Eng, Eng Programs - Maintenance Rule [58]

DIE ISSUED SMA f~l 6.4 Maintenance Rule 10CFR 50.65 NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory Tech Svcs Eng, Eng Programs - Misc Programs [27]

DIE ISSUED SMA

n 1.2 2.1 4.1 General Impacts Misc Mechanical Interfaces Misc I&C Interfaces NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

Training - Services [46]

DIE ISSUED SMA l

l 1

1

["""I 2.1 "Mandatory DIEs, Program & Procedure Interfaces Misc Mechanical Interfaces NOTE:

All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory Training - Simulator [8]

DIE ISSUED SMA l

l 1.1 Mandatory DIEs, Program & Procedure Interfaces I

1.2 General Impacts l

j 6.3 Plant Controls - Human Factors NOTE: All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory.

COMMENTS

DESIGN INTERFACE

SUMMARY

NOP-CC-2004-09 BV1 Calculation No.

Page 8 of 8 PRDC-0015, R/2, A 3 2

Rev. No 0

PY B

Calculation PRDC-0015, R/2 A 3 established minimum terminal voltage for Division 2 battery as 111 8 volts (111.8/60=1.863 volts per cell) to ensure all the DC components to operate properly The final discharge voltage for the Division 2 batteries now is 111 8 volts (1 863 volts per cell) compared to previous final discharge voltage of 105 volts (1.75 volts per cell)

The calculation has been prepared and reviewed by qualified electrical engineering personnel All the electrical aspects of the calculation have been considered Therefore, the Electrical review (DIE 20) is waived Review of Potential Interfaces using DIRC (NOP-CC-2004-08) as provided in CMIS indicates that no DIE from any discipline including Design Engineenng Security Systems. Design Engineenng Safe Shutdown, Maintenance Work Planning, Operations Services Fire Marshall, Operations Procedures, Site Protection Operations, Training Semites and Jfaining Simulator are required This Therefore these Interface reviews have been waived Supervisor Approval Date _

Note The signed DIE'S which were issued in 2009 identified the minimum terminal voltage for Division 2 battery as 112 5 volts (112 5/60=1 875 volts per cell)

Subsequent analysis resulted in the standardization of the Fluke 45 (0 045 V) as the recommended test instrument for battery testng versus the Fluke 77 (0 48 V)

This has resulted in the reduction of the minimum terminal voltage for Division 2 battery as 111.8 volts (111.8/60=1 863 volts per cell)

This change would not result in a different conclusion on any of the completed DIEs The associated SVI's will stll have to be revised accordingly as noted in the affected documents listing for DIE 40

/

Prepared By:

I Gaffney, Darral Date:

07/14/2011 Reviewed By lDate:

07/14/2011

DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Page 1 of 3 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation

- PRDC-0015, R/2, A 3 Division 2, 125 VDC System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing calculation Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

19/0

SUMMARY

OF CHANGE & POTENTIAL IMPACT BV1 D DB PY To: Interfacing Organization Design Eng

- Configuration Control Point of Contact Mackey, Todd Mail Stop PY-A180 Due Date 11/07/2009 From/Return To: Responsible Engineer Chatterjee, Pan Mail Stop PY-A165 Phone 440-280-5209 Description of Change/Areas of Concern Calculation PRDC-0015, R/2 A 3 determined that the Division 2 battery terminal voltage should be 112.5 for all the DC components to operate properly.

This equates to 112.5 / 60 = 1.875 volts per cell (Division 2 battery has 60 cells).

The final discharge voltage for the Division 2 batteries now is 112.5 volts (1.875 volts per cell) compared to previous final discharge voltage of 105 volts (1.75 volts per cell).

This Addendum A3 has re-sized the Division 2 batteries based on 1.875 vpc as the final discharged voltage. Atlas database may require update to reflect correct calculation reference and the changes described above.

RESPONSE

o NOP-CC-200*

DIRC IMPACTfs)

Topic / Ques No.

1.2/40 (Evaluate impact Identified by the following questions from the Design Interface Review Checklist)

QUESTION Does the change impact an systems described in the site Design Basis Documents /

Database ?

M15 Annulus Exhaust Gas Treatment M25 Control Room HVAC M26 Control Room Emergency Recirculation M51 Combustible Gas Control M56 Hydrogen Ignition N27 Feedwater N64 Off Gas P41 Service Water P42 Emergency Closed Cooling P43 Nuclear Closed Cooling P45 Emergency Service Water P50 Containment Vessel Chilled Water System P54 Fire Protection P57 Safety Related Instrument Air R10 Plant Electrical R43 Div.

1 & 2 Standby Diesel Generator R44 Div.

1 & 2 Standby Diesel Generator Starting Air R45 Div.

1 & 2 Standby Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Sys., High Pressure Core Spray Div. 3 Diesel Generator R46 Div.

1 & 2 Standby Diesel Generator Jacket Water Cooling R47 Div.

1 & 2 Standby Diesel Generator Lube Oil R48 Div.

1 & 2 Standby Diesel Generator Exhaust, Intake, And Exhaust T23 Containment Design Atlas contains the following systems: B13 Reactor And Internals B21 Nuclear Boiler Process Instrumentation, Auto Depressunzation, Nuclear Steam Supply Shutoff(NSSS) B33 Reactor Recirculation, Jet Pump Instrumentation Cll Control Rod Drive C22 Redundant Reactivity Control C34 Feedwater Control C41 Standby Liquid Control C51 Neutron Monitoring Startup Range (SRM, ARM), Power Range (LPRM, APRM), Startup Range Detector Drive, Transverse Incore Probe (TIP) C61 Remote Reactor Shutdown C71 Reactor Protection, Motor Generator Set Controls C85 Steam Bypass & Pressure Reg. E12 Residual Heat Removal E21 Low Pressure Core Spray E22 High Pressure Core Spray Division 3 Diesel Generator E31 Leak Detection E51 Reactor Core Iso. Cooling G33 Reactor Water Clean Up G41 Fuel Pool Cooling Drain And Clean Up G42 Suppression Pool Drain And Clean Up G43 Suppression Pool Make Up IMPACT:

Addendum 3 to Calculation PRDC-0015 impacts the R42 System in Atlas. This change resizes the Division 2 batteries to a final discharge voltage for all DC components to operate correctly.

DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-O7 Page 2 of 3 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation - PRDC-0015, R/2, A 3 Division 2, 125 VDC System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing calculation Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

19/0 OTHER IMPACTS (Evaluate impact from the following General and Subject Matter Expert level questions)

QUESTION Describe the effect on the current licensing basis for the system / structure / component (SSC) involved.

IMPACT:

None with respect to Atlas.

Describe effect of proposed change on existing design basis.

IMPACT:

With respect to Atlas, the change does not change the capability of the Division 2 batteries to perform their function. The design remains the same, but the only thing that has changed is the sizing of the battery for final discharge voltage.

Identify relevant design criteria and standards (including applicable revision/addenda).

IMPACT:

22A2722 Plant DC Power Specification Identify potential failure mechanisms and failure consequences IMPACT:

None with respect to Atlas.

Describe the impact on operational configuration, system interactions, and any other pertinent considerations.

Identify required actions.

IMPACT:

Addendum 3 to Calculation PRDC-0015 will require some changes to the Atlas database. This will include adding Addendum 3 to PRDC-0015 as a reference as well as editing current information that's in Atlas.

Identify appropriate installation requirements and acceptance criteria for testing.

IMPACT:

None with respect to Atlas.

Identify any limitations such as open assumptions or engineering holds.

Identify what is restrained and what is required to release the hold.

IMPACT:

None with respect to Atlas.

IF the change will add, modify, or delete equipment, components, systems, or processes that result in the need for personnel to acquire additional skills and knowledge, THEN complete the Affected Documents section below.

Identify Training as the Document Type, assign an Action Code, and Responsible Organization.

IMPACT:

Addendum 3 to calculation PRDC-0015 will be added to the Atlas database as a reference.

Also, this will require some modifications to information that is currently in the Atlas database.

COMMENTS/ADDTIONAL INPUT/ INFORMATION (Include observations, recommendations & suggestions not provided in response to the above questions)

Addendum 3 to Calculation PRDC-0015 impacts the R42 System in Atlas. This change resizes the Division 2 batteries to a final discharge voltage for all DC components to operate correctly. This will require some changes to the Atlas database. See Notification 600579544.

DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation

- PRDC-0015, R/2, A 3 Division 2, 125 VDC System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing calculation Page 3 of 3 Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

19/0 AFFECTED DOCUMENTS LIST List new and/or existing documents requiring issue/update as a result of this activity (e.g.,

drawings, procedures, databases, lesson plans, and vendor manuals).

It is presumed the latest revision/version of the document was used when identifying the impact.

Doc Type xDataba se Document ID Atlas Unit 1

Action Codes:

1

- Required for Operational Acceptance 2 - Required for Implementation. Requires an 3 - Required to be issued concurrent with the 4 - Required for closeout of the activity 5 - Later - can be completed when responsible Rev.

N/A Version 2.1.0 Document Owner/

Responsible Organization Design Eng Configuratio n Control Affected Functional Location(s)

Enter FLOC Action Code*

5 Engineering Hold per NOP-CC-2003 change package organization deems appropriate.

"""Requires a SAP Tracking Number**

600579544 SECTION 3

- CONCLUSION LJ Interface Not Required (Provide Justification)

Interface Provided (Indicate if Final Review Required)

Final Review Required Interface Evaluator (Print Name and Sign)

Mackey,Todd Date 11/12/2009 Comments need to be resolved Interface Evaluator My comments/input have been properly incorporated and/or addressed.

Required for Engineering Organizations

DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Page 1 of 3 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation

- PRDC-0015, R/2, A 3 Division 2, 125 VDC System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing calculation Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

22/0 NUMMARY OF CHANGE 8t POTENTIAL IMPAC D

BV2 DB PY To: Interfacing Organization Plant & Equip Reliability Eng Point of Contact Kuntz, Marc Mail Stop PY-A250 Due Date 11/07/2009 From/Return To: Responsible Engineer Chatterjee, Pan Mail Stop PY-A165 Phone 440-280-5209 Description of Change/Areas of Concern Calculation PRDC-0015, R/2 A 3 determined that the Division 2 battery terminal voltage should be 112.5 for all the DC components to operate properly.

This equates to 112.5 / 60 = 1.875 volts per cell (Division 2 battery has 60 cells).

The final discharge voltage for the Division 2 batteries now is 112.5 volts (1.875 volts per cell) compared to previous final discharge voltage of 105 volts (1.75 volts per cell).

This Addendum A3 has re-sized the Division 2 batteries based on 1.875 vpc as the final discharged voltage. Necessary SVI/GEI/CMI procedures for Division 2 battery require revision to reflect 112.5 volts (1.875 volts per cell) from 105 volts (1.75 volts per cell).

DIRC IMPACT(s)

Topic / Ques No.

1.1/3 (Evaluate impact identified by the following questions from the Design Interface Review Checklist)

QUESTION Does the change impact any Plant Engineering NSSS (Nuclear Steam Supply), BOP (Balance Of Plant), Engineering Electrical & Controls, OR Plant Computer System SSC ?

IMPACT:

1. Impact of change on system (installation and final configuration).

This calcualtion addendum does not affect system configuration.

No physical changes are being made.

2. Change to system operation or maintenance.

This calcualtion addendum does not affect system operation or maintenance. No physical changes are being made.

3. Impact on procedures or instructions under the responsibility of Plant Engineering.

No procedures or instructions under the responsibility of Plant Engineering are affected.

4. Test requirements and plant and or system configuration required.

No system changes are being made by this calculation addendum.

There are no test requirements.

5. Increased vendor oversight or enhanced procurement.

Not applicable to this calculation addendum. No system changes are being made. Nothing is being procured.

6. Changes to SAP functional location or component classification.

Not applicable to this calculation addendum. No system changes are being made.

7.

Is there a need to revise, add or delete a component repetitive calibration?

Not applicable to this calculation addendum. No system changes are being made.

8. Mamtenence Rule or performance monitoring changes.

This calculation addendum will result in a change to the

DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Page 2 of 3 Modification/Document/ Activity ID Calculation

- PRDC-0015, R/2, A 3 Division 2, 125 VDC System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing calculation Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

22/0 acceptance criteria of the Division 2 battery Service Tests.

Performance monitoring will be changed by the revised acceptance criteria for this testing.

OTHER IMPACTS (Evaluate impact from the following General and Subject Matter Expert level questions)

QUESTION Describe the effect on the current licensing basis for the system / structure / component (SSC) involved.

IMPACT:

Not applicable to this review per NOP-CC-2004 DIE guidelines.

Describe effect of proposed change on existing design basis.

IMPACT:

Not applicable to this review per NOP-CC-2004 DIE guidelines.

Identify relevant design criteria and standards (including applicable revision/addenda).

IMPACT:

Not applicable to this review per NOP-CC-2004 DIE guidelines.

Identify potential failure mechanisms and failure consequences IMPACT:

Not applicable to this review per NOP-CC-2004 DIE guidelines.

Describe the impact on operational configuration, system interactions, and any other pertinent considerations.

Identify required actions.

IMPACT:

No system changes are being made. Operational configuration and system interactions are not affected.

Identify appropriate installation requirements and acceptance critena for testing.

IMPACT:

Not applicable. Nothing is being installed. No testing is necessary.

Identify any limitations such as open assumptions or engineering holds.

Identify what is restrained and what is required to release the hold.

IMPACT:

Not applicable to this review per NOP-CC-2004 DIE guidelines.

IF the change will add, modify, or delete equipment, components, systems, or processes that result in the need for personnel to acquire additional skills and knowledge, THEN complete the Affected Documents section below.

Identify Training as the Document Type, assign an Action Code, and Responsible Organization.

IMPACT:

Not applicable to this review per NOP-CC-2004 DIE guidelines.

COMMENTS/ADDTIONAL INPUT/ INFORMATION (Include observations, recommendations & suggestions not provided in response to the above questions)

DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Page 3 of 3 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation

- PRDC-0015, R/2, A 3 Division 2, 125 VDC System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charqer Sizinq calculation Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

22/0 AFFECTED DOCUMENTS LIST List new and/or existing documents requiring issue/update as a result of this activity (e.g.,

drawings, procedures, databases, lesson plans, and vendor manuals).

It is presumed the latest revision/version of the document was used when identifying the impact.

Doc Type Document ID Unit Rev.

Version Document Owner/

Responsible Organization Affected Functional Location(s)

Action Code*

Tracking Number**

Action Codes:

1

- Required for Operational Acceptance 2

- Required for Implementation. Requires an Engineering Hold per NOP-CC-2003 3

- Required to be issued concurrent with the change package 4

- Required for closeout of the activity 5

- Later - can be completed when responsible organization deems appropriate. **Requires a SAP Interface Not Required (Provide Justification)

Interface Provided (Indicate if Final Review Required)

Final Review Required Interface Evaluator (Print Name and Sign)

Slack, Bill Date 11/10/2009 Approval*** (Print Name and Sign)

Date CD Comments need to be resolved l~~1 My comments/input have been properly incorporated and/or addressed.

Interface Evaluator Interface Evaluator Date Date Required for Engineering Organizations

FirstBneqgy DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation

- PRDC-0015, R/2, A 3 Division 2, 125 VDC System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing calculation Page 1 of 3 Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

40/0 ON 1

SUMMARY

OF CHANGE Pi IMPACT

BV1

BV2 DB PY To: Interfacing Organization Maintenance - Procedures Point of Contact Swartz, R Mail Stop Due Date 11/07/2009 From/Return To: Responsible Engineer Chatterjee, Pari Mail Stop PY-A165 Phone 440-280-5209 Description of Change/Areas of Concern Calculation PRDC-0015, R/2 A 3 determined that the Division 2 battery terminal voltage should be 112.5 for all the DC components to operate properly.

This equates to 112.5 / 60 = 1.875 volts per cell (Division 2 battery has 60 cells).

The final discharge voltage for the Division 2 batteries now is 112.5 volts (1.875 volts per cell) compared to previous final discharge voltage of 105 volts (1.75 volts per cell).

This Addendum A3 has re-sized the Division 2 batteries based on 1.875 vpc as the final discharged voltage. All the procedures for battery testing require revision to reflect 112.5 volts (1.875 volts per cell) from 105 volts (1.75 volts per cell).

iCTION 2

RESPONSE

DIRC IMPACTf si d Attachment 1

for quidan (Evaluate impact identified by the following questions from the Design Interface Review Checklist)

Topic / Ques No.

QUESTION 1.1/1 Does the change impact any Maintenance procedure ? Examples include Corrective or Preventive maintenance procedures impacted by changes in stock codes or special tools or processes.

IMPACT:

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Change will impact the Division 2 (Unit 1 and 2) service tests and Performance Tests OTHER IMPACTS (Evaluate impact from the following General and Subject Matter Expert level questions)

QUESTION Describe the effect on the current licensing basis for the system / structure / component (SSC) involved.

IMPACT:

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Describe effect of proposed change on existing design basis.

IMPACT:

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Identify relevant design criteria and standards (including applicable revision/addenda).

IMPACT:

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Identify potential failure mechanisms and failure consequences IMPACT:

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Describe the impact on operational configuration, system interactions, and any other pertinent considerations.

Identify required actions.

IMPACT:

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Page 2 of 3 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation

- PRDC-0015, R/2, A 3 Division 2, 125 VDC System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing calculation Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

40/0 Identify appropriate installation requirements and acceptance criteria for testing.

IMPACT:

Reviewed for Impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Identify any limitations such as open assumptions or engineering holds.

Identify what is restrained and what is required to release the hold.

IMPACT:

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

IF the change will add, modify, or delete equipment, components, systems, or processes that result in the need for personnel to acquire additional skills and knowledge, THEN complete the Affected Documents section below.

Identify Training as the Document Type, assign an Action Code, and Responsible Organization.

IMPACT:

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

COMMENTS/ADDTIONAL INPUT/ INFORMATION (Include observations, recommendations & suggestions not provided in response to the above questions)

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

AFFECTED DOCUMENTS LIST List new and/or existing documents requiring issue/update as a result of this activity (e.g.,

drawings, procedures, databases, lesson plans, and vendor manuals).

It is presumed the latest revision/version of the document was used when identifying the impact.

Doc Type Document ID Unit Rev.

Version Document Owner/

Responsible Organization Affected Functional Location(s)

Action Code*

Tracking Number**

Proced.,

non-eng SVI-R42-T5216 Maintenance Procedures Enter FLOC 600578043 Proced.,

non-eng SVI-R42-T5218 Maintenance Procedures Enter FLOC 600578043 S

Proced.,

non-eng SVI-R42-T5212 Maintenance Procedures Enter FLOC 600578043 Proced.,

non-eng ESVI-R42-T5214 Maintenance Procedures Enter FLOC 600578043 s

Action Codes:

1

- Required for Operational Acceptance 2

- Required for Implementation. Requires an Engineering Hold per NOP-CC-2003 3

- Required to be issued concurrent with the change package 4

- Required for closeout of the activity 5 - Later - can be completed when responsible organization deems appropriate. **Requires a SAP

FirsiEnejm DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation

- PRDC-0015, R/2, A 3 Division 2, 125 VDC System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing calculation Page 3 of 3 Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

40/0 l_l Interface Not Required (Provide Justification)

Interface Provided (Indicate if Fipal Review Required)

CD Final Review Required Interface Evaluator (Print Name and Sign},

Sanford, Timothy ate 11/10/2009 Approval*** (Print Name and Sign)

N/A Date 11/10/2009 EH Comments need to be resolved SECTION 4

- COMPLETE FINAL REVIEW Interface Evaluator Date I

l My comments/input have been properly incorporated and/or addressed.

Interface Evaluator Date Required for Engineering Organizations

FjrstEnergy DESIGN VERIFICATION RECORD Page 1 of 1 NOP-CC-2001-01 Rev 00 SECTION I:

TO BE COMPLETED"BY DESIGN ORIGINATOR 3fl&

DOCUMENT(S)/ACTIVITYTO BE VERIFIED:

PRDC-0015, R2.A3 SAFETY RELATED AUGMENTED QUALITY D

NONSAFETY RELATED SUPPORTING/REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ECP 09-0081 DESIGN ORIGINATOR: (Print and Sign Namp),

Darral E. Gaffney /

/T/ ^ *>

DATE section ih VERIFICATION METHOD (Check one)

£3 DESIGN REVIEW (Complete Design Review Checklist or Calculation Review Checklist)

I ALTERNATE CALCULATION QUALIFICATION TESTING JUSTIFICATION FOR SUPERVISOR PERFORMING VERIFICATION:

N/A APPROVAL:

(Pnnt and Sign Name)

N/A DATE EXTENT OF VERIFICATION:

A complete check of all mathematical computations not performed by DCSDM was performed, as well as a verification of inputs used in the calculation.

COMMENTS, ERRORS OR DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED?

YES NO RESOLUTION: (For Alternate Calculation or Qualification Testing only)

N/A RESOLVED BY: (Print and Sign Name)

Darral E Gaffney /

DATE

/

"7'*A" VERIFIER: (Print and Sign Name)

RyanMBnggs S

g

/

I

/

Vol.

DATE

,^pifTr APPROVES BY.

(

^wvA r

ftrst&ragv CALCULATION REVIEW CHECKLIST NOP-CC-2001-04 Rev. 05 QUESTION General 1

Does the stated objective/purpose clearly describe why the calculation is being performed?

2.

Are design input / output documents and references listed and clearly identified in the document index, including edition and addenda, where applicable?

3.

Were verbal inputs from third parties properly documented?

4.

Are design input parameters, such as physical and geometric characteristic and regulatory or code and standard requirements, accurately taken from the design input documents and correctly incorporated, including tolerances and units?

5.

Are the design inputs relevant, current, consistent with design/licensing bases and directly applicable to the purpose of the calculation, including appropriate tolerances and ranges/modes of operation?

6.

Are all design inputs retrievable?

If not, have they been added as attachments?

7.

Are preliminary or conceptual inputs clearly identified for later confirmation as open assumptions?

8.

Where applicable, were construction and operating considerations included as input information?

9.

Were design input / output documents property updated to reference this calculation?

Assumptions 10.

Have the assumptions necessary to perform the analysis been clearly identified and adequately described?

11.

Are all assumptions for the calculation reasonable and consistent with design/licensing bases?

12.

Have all open assumptions needing later confirmation been clearly identified on the Calculation cover sheet, including when the open assumption needs to be closed?

13.

Has an SAP Activity Initiation Form been created for open assumptions?

14.

Have engineering judgments been clearly identified?

15.

Are engineering judqments reasonable and adequately documented?

16.

Is suitable justification provided for all assumptions/engineering judgements (except those based upon recognized engineering practice, physical constants or elementary scientific principles)?

Method of Analysis 17.

Is the method used appropriate considering the purpose and type of calculation?

18.

Is the method in accordance with applicable codes, standards, and design/licensing bases?

Identification of Computer Codes (Ref: NOP-SS-1001) 19.

Have the versions of the computer codes employed in the design analysis been certified for this application?

20.

Are codes properly identified along with source (vendor, organization, etc.)?

21.

Is the code applicable for the analysis being performed?

22.

Is the computer program(s) being used listed on the FENOC Usable Software List for the site?

NA X

X X

Yes X

X X

No Page 1 of

<<f CALCULATION NO. PUpC-OOly REV. 09k ADDENDUM NO. 8*3 UNIT 1

COMMENTS There are no open assumptions associated with this calculation.

RESOLUTION

FirstEnetnv CALCULATION REVIEW CHECKLIST NOP-CC-2001-04 Rev. 05 QUESTION 23.

Does the computer model, that has been created, adequately reflect actual (or to be modified) plant conditions (e.g., dimensional accuracy, type of model/code options used, time steps, etc.)?

24.

Did the computer output generate any ERROR or WARNING Messages that could invalidate the results?

25.

Is the computer output reasonable when compared to inputs and what was expected?

Computations 26.

Are the equations used consistent with recognized engineering practice and design/licensing bases?

27.

Is there a reasonable justification provided for the uses of any equations not in common use?

28.

Were the mathematical operations performed properly and the results accurate?

29.

Have adjustment factors, uncertainties, empirical correlations, etc., used in the analysis been correctly applied?

30.

Is the result presented with proper units and tolerance?

31.

Has proper consideration been given to results that may be overly sensitive to very small changes in input?

Conclusions 32.

Is the magnitude of the result reasonable and expected when compared to inputs?

33.

Is there a reasonable justification provided for deviations from the acceptance criteria?

34.

Are stated conclusions justifiable based on the calculation results?

35.

Are all pages sequentially numbered and marked with a valid calculation and revision number?

36.

Is all information legible and reproducible?

37.

Is the calculation presentation complete and understandable without any need to refer back to the Originator for clarification or explanations?

38.

Is calculation format presented in a logical and orderly manner, in conformance with the standard calculation content of NOP-CC-3002 (Attachment 1)?

39.

Have all changes in the documentation been initialed (or signed) and dated by the author of the change and all required reviewers?

Design/Licensing 40.

Have all calculation results stayed within existing design/licensing basis parameters?

41.

If the response to Question 40 is NO, has Licensing been notified as appropriate? (i.e.

UFSAR or Tech Spec Change Request has been initiated).

42.

Is the direction of trends reasonable?

43.

Has the calculation Preparer used all applicable design information/requirements provided?

44.

Did the calculation Preparer determine if the calculation was referenced in design basis documents and/or databases?

45.

Did the Preparer determine if the calculation was used as a reference in the UFSAR?

46.

If the calculation is used as a reference in the UFSAR, is a change to the UFSAR required or an update to the UFSAR Validation Database, if applicable, required?

NA X

X X

X Yes X

X X

X No Page 2 of *j CALCULATION NO. PrtPC -OolK REV. ©>

ADDENDUMNO.fi) ?

UNIT 1

COMMENTS All the acceptance criteria were met RESOLUTION

CALCULATION REVIEW CHECKLIST NOP-CC-2001-04 Rev. 05 QUESTION 47.

If the answer to Question 46 is YES, have the appropriate documents been initiated?

48.

Has the applicability of 10CFR50.59 to this calculation been considered and documented?

Acceptable 49.

Does the calculation meet its purpose/objective?

50.

Is the calculation acceptable for use?

51.

What checkinq method was used to review the calculation?

Check all that apply.

spot check for math complete check for math comparison with tests check by alternate method comparison with previous calculation 52.

If the calculation was prepared by a vendor, does it comply with the technical and quality requirements described in the Procurement Documents?

Reference the Purchase Order number or other procurement document number in the Comments Section of this question.

53.

Have Professional Engineer (PE) certification requirements been addressed and documented where required by ASME Code (if applicable).

NA X

X X

Yes X

X X

No Page 3 of *f CALCULATION NO. fHVC~OOt$'

REV.&f<

ADDENDUM NO.& 3 UNIT 1

COMMENTS RESOLUTION Review Summary:

See Design Verification Record (DVR).

Technical Review (Print and Sign Name)

N/A Design Veriflcat Ryan M Briggs /

on (Print and Sign Name)

Date Date Owner's Acceptance Review (Required for calculations prepared by a vendor)

Reviewer (Print and Sign Name)

N/A Approver (Print and Sign Name)

N/A Date Date

Document Number, Revision &

Title:

PRDC-0015 Revision 2, Addendum A03 Division 2,125VDC System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing Calculation.

Type (comment):

1.

Technical 2.

Editorial 3.

Preference Status:

Resolution accepted by reviewer (Initial)

Initiating Document:

CR 08-39315 &

08-44299

ttM, r/af, Reviewed by:

Ryan M Briggs Date:

4/22/10 Resolved by:

Darral E. Gaffney Date:

Page* of4" Item Ref Comment Type Response/ Resolution Status Approved Calc Section 4.4.4 Section 4.4.4 still lists 1.75 VPC as the fully discharged voltage and is not being updated by this addendum.

This page should be updated to reflect 1.875 VPC.

Revised last sentence; Fully discharged battery VPC is unknown at this section of the calculation.

VPC will be determined later in this calculation.

There is no discussion as to why Attachment 1 calculates 112.25 as the minimum required voltage, but 112.5 V is used when calculating the minimum VPC.

Revised Attachment 1, the new minimum required voltage is 111.8 VDC; The Fluke 45 (0.045 V) will become the recommended test instrument for battery testing versus the Fluke 77 (0.48 V); associated SVI's will have to be revised accordingly.

DIS Several of the mandatory DIEs were not issued however, the comments on the DIS do not mention them as being waived.

DIS has been revised.

DIE 40 Tracking numbers are listed for the identified maintenance procedures however, no action code is listed.

I am assuming these should be Action Code 5.

Action Code #5 has been added.

Km Coversheet See attached markup Coversheet has been revised.