L-15-257, Calculation PRDC-0015, Rev. 2, Addendum A02, Division 2,125 Vdc System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing Calculation

Calculation PRDC-0015, Rev. 2, Addendum A02, Division 2,125 Vdc System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing Calculation

ML15316A517
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	08/08/2008
From:	Chatterjee P FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-15-257 PRDC-0015, Rev 2, Add A02
Download: ML15316A517 (16)

Text

CALCULATION ADDENDUM NOP-CC-3002-02 Rev. 05 Pg1of2 CALCULATION NO. PRDC-0015 INITIATING DOCUMENT CA 08-44299-1 CALCULATION REV.

2 ADDENDUM NO.

A 02 D

BV1 1

D BV2 DB PY TITLE/

SUBJECT:

(MUST MATCH ORIGINAL CALCULATION TITLE (SUBJECT))

Division 2,125 VDC System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing Calculation Classification Tier 1 Calculation Safety-Related/Augmented Quality D

Nonsafety-Related Open Assumptions?

Yes No If Yes, Enter Tracking Number N/A Initiating Document CA 08-44299-1 (Perry & Davis-Besse Only)

Referenced In Atlas?

I Yes U No (Perry Only)

Referenced In USAR Validation Database Yes No Computer Program(S)

Program Name Version / Revision Category Status Description DCSDM 3.0.

B Active Direct Current System Database Module Originator (Print, Sign & Datey^

• y&/0 Reviewer/Design VerifierfP/fnf, Sign & Date)

PARI CHATTERJEE)

ApproverfPrint, Sign RAY TANNEY /

OBJECTIVE OR PURPOSE OF ADDENDUM:

/

Revise allowable voltage for Battery SVI Load Profile in section 4.6.4~of the calculation as shown in Attachment 1.

SCOPE OF ADDENDUM:

CR 08-44299 identified that Unit 2 Division 2 Battery Service Test did not meet the allowable voltage as shown in the SVI which is derived from Section 4.6.4 of this calculation Addendum A01, R/2.

As a result of this CR, Division 2 battery SVI allowable voltage as shown in Section 4.6.4, Addendum A01, R/2 of this calculation will be changed as shown in Attachment LIST NEW DOCUMENTS TO BE ADDED TO THE DOCUMENT INDEX (DIN).

DIN No.

1 DocumentNumber/Title,EvaluationofDivision2BatterySVIAllowableVoltage Revision,Edition,Date N/A Reference D

D Input El

Output

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS OF ADDENDUM:

The revised load profile for section 4.6.4 is shown in Attachment 1.

There is no change or impact on battery/battery charger sizing, device voltage and overall results and conclusion of the calculation.

There is no change to USAR Table 8.3-7 load profile currents.

Therefore, this Addendum does not change or impact USAR Table 8.3-7.

Results of this Addendum will be used to revise the appropriate Division 1 battery SVIs.

LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS CREATED BY ADDENDUM:

None IMPACT OF ADDENDUM ON OUTPUT DOCUMENTS:

There is no change or impact on USAR Table 8.3-7.

The affected SVIs will be revised per results of this Addendum.

Reviewed the other two output documents PRDC-0012 and PSTG-0001 and found no impact on these documents by this Addendum.

DESCRIBE WHERE THE ADDENDUM WILL BE EVALUATED FOR 10CFR50.59 APPLICABILITY:

RrstEnergy CALCULATION ADDENDUM NOP-CC-3002-02 Rev. 05 Pg 2 of 2 CALCULATION NO. PRDC-0015 INITIATING DOCUMENT CA 08-44299-1 CALCULATION REV.

2 ADDENDUM NO.

A 02 There is no change in Battery/Battery Charger sizing, load evaluation and device voltage drop by this Addendum.

There is no impact on calculation results and conclusion by this Addendum.

Therefore, the 10CFR50.59 Evaluation 08-02693 (RAD &

Screen only) for R/3 of this calculation is also applicable for this Addendum.

LIST SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: (Include total number of pages)

DIS - 3 Pages, DIEs - 5 Pages, DVR -1 Page, Calc Review Checklist - 3 Pages.

LIST ATTACHMENTS: (Include total number of pages) -

1 Page -1 Page to PRDC-0015. R/2. API 4.6.4 USAR TABLE 8.3.7 LOAD PROFILE USAR Table 8.3-7 provides the DC load profile for Division 2 battery for the design basis accident scenario.

Service tests (per SVIs) for the batteries are performed utilizing the load profile from Table 8.3-7.

The Battery load profile in this Addendum has both the current and the voltage information and is shown in Attachment 2 of this Addendum.

The current at different nodes is obtained from Attachment G of the calculation.

The voltage is based on worst case minimum acceptable voltage of the components and adding the cable drop between the components and the battery.

See Attachment 2 for detail evaluation.

These currents and voltages were increased to account for measuring instrument error of 0.5 volts [Typical Fluke Model 77 error is +/-(0.3% of Reading +

1 LSD)] for this load profile The load profile below is per IEEE Std. 450-1995, Paragraph 6.6 for Service Tests which states that the test should not be corrected for temperature or age, if the battery was sized in accordance with IEEE Std 485-1983 that already accounts for margin for age and temperature.

The batteries are sized per above referenced IEEE Std. for discharge voltage of 105 volts in this calculation.

To support this load profile, the battery sizing was recalculated per above IEEE Std. for discharge voltage of 1.92 volts/cell (115.2 battery volts) accounting for aging and temperature correction and found to have adequate margin. shows the battery sizing worksheet for Division 2 battery using the 1.92 volts per cell discharge curve.

The revised load profile is as follows:

Period 1

is - 0 to 1min -Duration 1 min ->>210 amp and voltage is s 113 volts Period 2 is -1 to 2 min ->>Duration 1 min -+ 105 amp and voltage is a 113 volts Period 3 is - 2 to 3 min -> Duration 1 min -* 125 amp and voltage is s 113 volts Period 4 is - 3 to 10 min -* Duration 7 min -> 105 amp and voltage is fc 113 volts Period 5 is -10 to 11 min ->> Duration 1 min -+ 125 amp and voltage is & 113 volts Period 6 is -11 to 119 min ->> Duration 108 min ->>105 amp and voltage is 2 113 volts Period 7 is -119 to 120 min -> Duration 1 min -125 amp and voltage is a 116.5 volts CHANGES FOR THIS ADDENDUM ARE SHOWN BOLD Pglofl

Evaluation of Division 2 Minimum Required Voltage Evaluation 1

Device SPCHGM-1-EH1201-F22 SPCHGM-1-EH1212-F22 SOL-1E51-F425 SOL-1-C11-1F110B RLY-1E12-K3B RLY-1B21-K6B/K7B/K8B RLY-1E12-K110B10.12 ARI-1C11F160B/F162D/F162B/F1 63B RLY-1R43-TD1A RLY-1R43-TD1B CNTCTR-K1 RLY-2P47-K2LL/K3/K95 PWRSUP-1C95-RACK 1,2 2

Node/Panel Sw#

13 13 ED1B08. Sw#1 ED1B08, Sw#2 ED1B08. Sw#5 ED1B08, Sw#7 ED1B08, Sw<<8 ED1B08, Sw#14 ED1B06, Sw#7 ED1B06. Sw#8 ED1B06, Sw#9 ED1B06, Sw#12 ED1B06, Sw#15 3

Time Step 5

27 W

W W

W W

W W

W W

W 4

Load Step 1

7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-6 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 5

Battery Voltage 117.669 118.056 117 669 117.669 117.669 117 669 117.669 117669 117669 117669 117.669 117669 117 669 6

Node Voltage 115.49 11591 116 81 116.81 116.81 116.81 116.81 116.357 116.764 116.764 116 206 116.764 116.764 7

Device Voltage 85.99 82 25 1149 112.83 109.81 113 89 11212 95 89 108.33 108 04 107 48 1145 110 07 8

Required Voltage 80 80 100 105 100 100 100 90 100 100 100 100 100 9

Batt

- Node Drop 2179 2146 0.859 0.859 0 859 0 859 0.859 1.312 0905 0.905 1463 0.905 0.905 10 Node - Load Drop 29.5 33 66 191 398 7

2.92 469 20 467 8.434 8 724 8.726 2264 6694 Details of the Spreadsheet:

1) Breaker EH1212 is required to close at 1 HR 59 MIN when the SPCHGM charges and the Node voltage is 115.91 from Attachment B, PRDC-0015, R/2.

2) Column 1 - Devices in each switch that has lowest margin, obtained from Attachment L1, PRDC-0015, R/2 SPCHGM that are operated during an accident condition were only consic

3) Column 2-Node numbers from PRDC-0015, R/2, Attachment B for SPCHGM For remaining devices that has minimum device voltage for each switch in ED1B06and ED1B08pan<

L1.

4) Column 3 - Calculation Time Step from PRDC-0015, R/2. "W indicates time step with worst case minimum voltage was usec

5) Column 4 - Applicable SVI Load Step.

6) Column 5 - Battery voltage obtained from Attachment F of PRDC-0015, R/2

7) Column 6 - Node voltage obtained from Attachment B of PRDC-0015. R/2

8) Column 7 - Device voltac

9) Column 8 - Required voll

11) Column 10 - Voltage drt

12) Column 11

- Minimum P Devices selected above An M&TE accuracy error of Therefore, considering diag Therefore, considering diag

<< for SPCHGM is from Attachment 1 and B Device voltages for the remaining devices are from Attachment L1 of PRDC-0015, R/2.

age for SPCHGM is from Section 5 2 of PRDC-0015, R/2 based on site results. For all other devices from Attachment L1

> between Battery and the Node (Column 5 - Column 6).

>p between Node and the device (Column 6 - Column 7) equired Battery Voltage at the device is Column 8 + Column 9 + Column 10 0 5V is being used This is consistant with calculation PRDC-0015 nostic instrument accuracy the minimum required voltage is for Step 1-6111.779 + 05=112.279 >> 113 volts for SVI Testing, nostic instrument accuracy the minimum required voltage is for Step 7 is 115.8+0.5 = 116.34 >>116.5 volts for SVI Testing I

I 11 Mm Required Battery Vottage 111679 115.806 102 769 109.839 107.859 103 779 105.549 111.779 109 339 109.629 110189 103.169 107 599 lered to Calc PROC-0015, A 02

DESIGN VERIFICATION RECORD Page 1 of 1 NOP-CC-2001-01 Rev. 00 SECTION I: TO BE COMPLETED BYDESIGN ORIGINATOR DOCUMENT(S)/ACTIVITY TO BE VERIFIED:

PRDC-0015, Revision 2, Addendum 02 SAFETY RELATED AUGMENTED QUALITY NONSAFETY RELATED SUPPORTING/REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Calculation Review Checklist DESIGN ORIGINATOR: (Print and Sign Name)

Pan Chatterjee /

DATE SECTION II:

TO BE COMPLETED BY VERIF4ER VERIFICATION METHOD (Check one)

E DESIGN REVIEW (Complete Design Review Checklist or Calculation Review Checklist)

D ALTERNATE CALCULATION I QUALIFICATION TESTING JUSTIFICATION FOR SUPERVISOR PERFORMING VERIFICATION:

N/A APPROVAL:

(Print and Sign Name)

N/A DATE EXTENT OF VERIFICATION:

A review of PRDC-0015 R/2 was performed, and the sources of the numbers used in Attachment 2 of the addendum were verified.

The calculation methodology outlined in the text of Attachment 2 as reviewed and found to be applicable.

A complete check of mathematical calculations was performed with no errors found.

Lastly it was confirmed that the results from the calculations in Attachment 2were correctly revised in the SVI Load Profile shown on Attachment 1 of the addendum.

COMMENTS, ERRORS OR DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED?

YES NO RESOLUTION: (For Alternate Calculation or Qualification Testing only)

RESOLVED BY: (Print and Sign Name)

N/A DATE VERIFIER: (Print and Sign Name)

RyanMBriggs/

DATE 9/t/o*

APPROVED BY:

Ray Tanney /

DATE

rfns§Cfjfuy CALCULATION REVIEW CHECKLIST NOP-CC-2001-04 Rev. 05 QUESTION General 1

Does the stated objective/purpose clearly describe why the calculation is being performed?

2.

Are design input / output documents and references listed and clearly identified in the document index, including edition and addenda, where applicable?

3.

Were verbal inputs from third parties properly documented?

4.

Are design input parameters, such as physical and geometric characteristic and regulatory or code and standard requirements, accurately taken from the design input documents and correctly incorporated, including tolerances and units?

5.

Are the design inputs relevant, current, consistent with design/licensing bases and directly applicable to the purpose of the calculation, including appropriate tolerances and ranges/modes of operation?

6.

Are all design inputs retrievable?

If not, have they been added as attachments?

7.

Are preliminary or conceptual inputs clearly identified for later confirmation as open assumptions?

8.

Where applicable, were construction and operating considerations included as input information?

9.

Were design input / output documents properly updated to reference this calculation?

ASSUMPTIONS 10.

Have the assumptions necessary to perform the analysis been clearly identified and adequately described?

11.

Are all assumptions for the calculation reasonable and consistent with design/licensing bases?

12.

Have all open assumptions needing later confirmation been clearly identified on the Calculation cover sheet, including when the open assumption needs to be closed?

13.

Has an SAP Activity Initiation Form been created for open assumptions?

14.

Have engineering judgments been clearly identified?

15.

Are engineering judgments reasonable and adequately documented?

16.

Is suitable justification provided for all assumptions/engineering judgements (except those based upon recognized engineering practice, physical constants or elementary scientific principles)?

Method of Analysis 17.

Is the method used appropriate considering the purpose and type of calculation?

18.

Is the method in accordance with applicable codes, standards, and design/licensing bases?

Identification of Computer Codes (Ref: NOP-SS-1001) 19.

Have the versions of the computer codes employed in the design analysis been certified for this application?

20.

Are codes property identified along with source (vendor, organization, etc.)?

21.

Is the code applicable for the analysis being performed?

22.

Is the computer program(s) being used listed on the FENOC Usable Software List for the site?

NA X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X X

Yes X

X X

X X

X X

X X

No Page 1 of 3 CALCULATION NO.

PRDC-0015 REV.

02 ADDENDUM NO.

02 UNIT 1&2 COMMENTS RESOLUTION

ftreffihgfgy CALCULATION REVIEW CHECKLIST NOP-CC-2001-04 Rev. 05 QUESTION 23.

Does the computer model, that has been created, adequately reflect actual (or to be modified) plant conditions (e.g., dimensional accuracy, type of model/code options used, time steps, etc.)?

24.

Did the computer output generate any ERROR or WARNING Messages that could invalidate the results?

25.

Is the computer output reasonable when compared to inputs and what was expected?

Computations 26.

Are the equations used consistent with recognized engineering practice and design/licensing bases?

27.

Is there a reasonable justification provided for the uses of any equations not in common use?

28.

Were the mathematical operations performed properly and the results accurate?

29.

Have adjustment factors, uncertainties, empirical correlations, etc., used in the analysis been correctly applied?

30.

Is the result presented with proper units and tolerance?

31.

Has proper consideration been given to results that may be overly sensitive to very small changes in input?

Conclusions 32:

Is the magnitude of the result reasonable and expected when compared to inputs?

33.

Is there a reasonable justification provided for deviations from the acceptance criteria?

34.

Are stated conclusions justifiable based on the calculation results?

35.

Are all pages sequentially numbered and marked with a valid calculation and revision number?

36.

Is all information legible and reproducible?

37.

Is the calculation presentation complete and understandable without any need to refer back to the Originator for clarification or explanations?

38.

Is calculation format presented in a logical and orderly manner, in conformance with the standard calculation content of NOP-CC-3002 (Attachment 1)?

39.

Have all changes in the documentation been initialed (or signed) and dated by the author of the change and all required reviewers?

Design/Licensing 40.

Have all calculation results stayed within existing design/licensing basis parameters?

41.

If the response to Question 40 is NO, has Licensing been notified as appropriate? (i.e.

UFSAR or Tech Spec Change Request has been initiated).

42.

Is the direction of trends reasonable?

43.

Has the calculation Preparer used all applicable design information/requirements provided?

44.

Did the calculation Preparer determine if the calculation was referenced in design basis documents and/or databases?

45.

Did the Preparer determine if the calculation was used as a reference in the UFSAR?

46.

If the calculation is used as a reference in the UFSAR, is a change to the UFSAR required or an update to the UFSAR Validation Database, if applicable, required?

47.

If the answer to Question 46 is YES, have the appropriate documents been initiated?

NA X

X X

X X

X X

X Yes X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X No X

Page 2 of 3 CALCULATION NO.

PRDC-0015 REV.

02 ADDENDUM NO.

02 UNIT 1&2 COMMENTS RESOLUTION

rtrsttji&uy CALCULATION REVIEW CHECKLIST NOP-CC-2001-04 Rev. 05 QUESTION 48.

Has the applicability of 10CFR50.59 to this calculation been considered and documented?

Acceptable 49.

Does the calculation meet its purpose/objective?

50.

Is the calculation acceptable for use?

51.

What checking method was used to review the calculation?

Check all that apply.

spot check for math complete check for math comparison with tests check by alternate method comparison with previous calculation 52.

If the calculation was prepared by a vendor, does it comply with the technical and quality requirements described in the Procurement Documents?

Reference the Purchase Order number or other procurement document number in the Comments Section of this question.

53.

Have Professional Engineer (PE) certification requirements been addressed and documented where required by ASME Code (if applicable).

NA X

X Yes X

X X

X No CALCULATION NO.

PRDC-00 REV.

02 ADDENDUM NO.

02 UNIT 1&2 COMMENTS Page 3 of 3 15 RESOLUTION Review Summary:

Addendum 02 to PRDC-0015, Revision 2 is complete and accurate and is acceptable for use.

Technical Review (Print and Sign Name)

N/A Design Verificati Ryan M Briggs /

t on (Print and Sign Name)

Date Date Owner's Acceptance Review (Required for calculations prepared by a vendor)

Reviewer (Print and Sign Name)

N/A Approver (Print am1 Sign Name)

Date Date

FirstEnerw DIE BV1 l

1 Interface Organization DESIGN INTERFACE

SUMMARY

NOP-CC-2004-09 BV2 l

l PY l X l Subject Matter Area Page 1 of 3 Calculation No.

PRDC-0015, A 02 Rev. No o

Department Name r

SMA#

Subject Matter Area Title Chemistry - Environmental 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 6.11 Special Interests, Chemical / Environmental 6.3 Special Interests, Plant Controls - Human Factors 28 19 20 Chemistry - Plant Chemistry 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts Design Eng - Configuration Control 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts Design Eng - Elec / lac, Misc Electrical 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 3.1 Electrical Systems, Misc Electrical Interfaces 6.1 Special Interests, FIRE Protection / Safe Shutdown 6.3 Special Interests, Plant Controls - Human Factors 51 Design Eng - Elec / lac, Misc I&C 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 4.1 Instruments & Controls, Misc I&C Interfaces 81 Design Eng - Elec / I&C, Security Systems 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 6.6 Special Interests, Radiation Protection

- ALARA 52 Design Eng - Elec / I&C, Safe Shutdown 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 3.1 Electrical Systems, Misc Electrical Interfaces 6.1 Special Interests, FIRE Protection / Safe Shutdown Design Eng - Engineering Analysis, Misc.

1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 5.3 Structures & Structural, Materials 6.2 Special Interests, Rx Containment Bldg & Drywell 6.3 Special Interests, Plant Controls - Human Factors 6.8 Special Interests, Internal Missile Hazards 6.9 Special Interests, Reactivity Ctrl, Accident, & Core Reload Analysis 2

67 21 Design Eng - Engineering Analysis, PSA 6.5 Special Interests, PSA - Probabilistic Safety Assessment Design Eng, Mech / Structural - Buildings ft Struct 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts Design Eng, Mech / Structural - Misc. Mechanical 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 5.3 Structures & Structural, Materials 6.2 Special Interests, Rx Containment Bldg & Drywell 6.7 Special Interests, NSSS Design Basis 60 Design Eng, Mech / Structural - Misc. Structural 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 5.1 Structures & Structural, Misc Structural Interfaces 5.2 Structures & Structural, Seismic Considerations 6.2 Special Interests, Rx Containment Bldg & Drywell 65 Design Eng, Mech / Structural - Seismic 3.1 Electrical Systems, Misc Electrical Interfaces 5.2 Structures & Structural, Seismic Considerations 9

18 Emergency Response 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts Industrial Safety 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts

DIE DESIGN INTERFACE

SUMMARY

NOP-CC-2004-09 BV1 ___

Calculation No.

Page 2 of 3 PRDC-0015, A 02 BV2 Interface Organization Subject Matter Area Department Name r

SMA#

Subject Matter Area Title 40 48 33 Maintenance -

17 i.i Maintenance -

1.2 Maintenance -

1.1 1.2 Procedures General Interfaces, Support Programs General Interfaces, Work Planning General Interfaces, General Interfaces, Departments / Units General Impacts Departments / Units General Impacts Operations - Unit 1 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 5.2 Structures & Structural, Seismic Considerations 6.3 Special Interests, Plant Controls

- Human Factors 6 9 Special Interests, Reactivity Ctrl, Accident, & Core Reload Analysis 54 30 22 76 24 77 7

42 59 55 80 56 57 58 Operations Services - Fire Marshal 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 6.1 Special Interests, FIRE Protection / Safe Shutdown Operations Services - Procedures 1.1 General Interfaces, Departments / Units 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts Plant & Equip Reliability Eng l7 1.1 General Interfaces, Departments / Units 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces Plant & Equip Reliability Eng - Cyber Security 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 6 3 Special Interests, Plant Controls - Human Factors Plant & Equip Reliability Eng - Reactor Eng 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 6.9 Special Interests, Reactivity Ctrl, Accident, & Core Reload Analysis Project Management - Refueling Engineering 6.10 Special Interests, Refueling Equipment & Rx Assembly Radiation Protection 6.6 Special Interests, Radiation Protection

- ALARA Site Protection 1.2 6.6 Tech Svcs Eng, 3.1 6.2

- Operations General Interfaces, General Impacts Special Interests, Radiation Protection

- ALARA Eng Programs - Appendix 3 Electrical Systems, Misc Electrical Interfaces Special Interests, Rx Containment Bldg & Drywell Tech Svcs Eng, Eng Programs - EQ 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 3.1 Electrical Systems, Misc Electrical Interfaces Tech Svcs Eng, 2.1 Tech Svcs Eng, 1.2 2.1 Tech Svcs Eng, 1.2 2.1 Tech Svcs Eng, 6.4 Eng Programs - FAC Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces Eng Programs - ISI General Interfaces, General Impacts Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces Eng Programs - 1ST, NDE, Boric Add General Interfaces, General Impacts Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces Eng Programs - Maintenance Rule Special Interests, Maintenance Rule 10CFR 50.65 27 Tech Svcs Eng, Eng Programs - Misc Programs

FirstB DESIGN INTERFACE

SUMMARY

NOP-CC-2004-09 BV1 BV2 DIE L_Q_

Page 3 of 3 PRDC-0015, A 02 Interface Organization Subject Matter Area Department Name SMA#

Subject Matter Area Title 1.2 2.1 General Interfaces, General Impacts Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 46 Training - Services 1.1 General Interfaces, Departments / Units 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces Training - Simulator 1.1 General Interfaces, Departments / Units 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 6.3 Special Interests, Plant Controls - Human Factors Comments This Addendum revises battery SVI load profile allowable voltage.

Review of the DIRC indicates that no DIE from Training and Operations Procedure is necessary or required for this activity.

The calculation is prepared by Electrical personnel and question on Electrical System has been considered and addressed in the calculation.

In summary, none of the above disciplines except the above two requires a design Interface for this adda<<flfrn.

t Prepared By:

[chatterjee, Date:

Page 1 of 2 DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation - PRDC-0015, A 02 Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

22/0

BV1 To: Interfacing Organization Plant & Equip Reliability Eng From/Return To: Responsible Engineer Chatterfee, Part

BV2 Point of Contact Kuntz, Marc

<<>B Mall Stop PY-A2S0 Mall Stop PY-A16S PY Due Date 08/21/2008 Phone 440-280-5209 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE/AREAS OF CONCERN PRDC 0015 Rev.2 Addendum 2 provides for a minimum acceptable Div. 2 battery terminal voltage of 113VDC for the first six periods of the battery load profile and a minimum acceptable battery terminal voltage of 116.5VDC for the seventh period of the battery load profile.

DIRC IMPACT?st (Evaluate impact identified by the following questions from the Design Interface Checklist)

Topic / Ques No.

QUESTION 1.1/3 Does the change impact any Plant Engineering NSSS (Nuclear Steam Supply), BOP (Balance Of Plant), Engineering Electrical & Controls, OR Plant Computer System SSC ?

IMPACT:

OTHER IMPACTS (Evaluate impact from the following General and Subject Matter Expert level questions)

QUESTION Identify potential failure mechanisms and failure consequences IMPACT: Not within the scope of this review.

Identify any limitations such as open assumptions or engineering holds.

Identify what is restrained and what is required to release the hold.

IMPACT: Not within the scope of this review.

Describe affect of proposed change on existing design basis.

IMPACT: Not within the scope of this evalaution.

Describe the affect on the current licensing basis for the system / structure / component (SSC) involved.

IMPACT: Not within the scope of this review.

Describe impact on operational configuration, system interactions, and any other pertinent considerations.

Identify required actions.

IMPACT: 1. This calculation revision for battery loading makes no physical changes to the plant DC system. Thus system installation and configuration are unchanged.

2. Since no physical changes are being made to the plant Dc system, there Is no system operational impact and no change to system maintenance requirements.

3. No component repetitive calibrations need to be added or revised. 4. No SAP functional location or component classification Is affected by this calculation revision.

5. Because there Is no impact on system configuration, operation or maintenance requirements, no performance monitoring plans or Maintenance Rule functions are affected.

IF the change will add, modify, or delete equipment, components, systems, or processes that result fn the need for personnel to acquire additional skills and knowledge, THEN complete the Affected Documents section below.

Identify Training as the Document Type, assign an Action Code, and Responsible Organization.

IMPACT: 6. No procedures under the control of PES are affected by this calculation revision.

Identify appropriate Installation requirements and acceptance criteria for testing.

IMPACT: 7. A calculation revision Is being reviewed, nothing is being Installed or physically changed, thus Installation requirements are not necessary. This calculation revision changes the acceptance criteria for Division 2 Battery Service Tests. The test Instructions are under the control of the Maintenance Dept. and will be revised accordingly. Test methodology and frequency are not changed. The revised acceptance limits will be verified as part of routine battery testing. 8. Because nothing is being procured, no enhanced procurement requirements are necessary. No vendor is involved In this calculation revision, so vendor oversight Is not applicable.

Identify relevant design criteria and standards (Including applicable revision/addenda).

IMPACT: Not within the scope of this review.

COMMENTS/ADDTIONAL INPUT/ INFORMATION (Include observations, recommendations & suggestions not provided in response to the above questions)

MB*/

Page 2 of 2 DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation

- PRDC-0015, A 02 Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

22/0 AFFECTED DOCUMENTS UST List new and/or existing documents requiring issue/update as a result of this activity (e.g., drawings, procedures, databases, lesson plans, and vendor manuals). It Is presumed the latest revision/version of the document was used when identifying the impact.

Document Type Document ID Unit 1

Rev.

Version Document Owner/

Responsible Organization Affected Functional Locatlon(s)

Action Code*

Tracking Number"

'Action Codes:

1 - Required for Operational Acceptance 2

- Required for Implementation. Requires an Engineering Hold per NOP-CC-2003 3

- Required to be issued concurrent with the change package 4 - Required for closeout of the activity 5 - Later - can be completed when responsible organization deems appropriate. "'Requires a SAP Notification number I

I Interface Not Required (Provide Justification)

Interface Provided (Indicate if Final Review Required) l l

Final Review Required Date Approval*** (Print 08/08/2008 Interface Evalqajtor (Print ttfme and Sign)

Slack, Bill I

I Comments need to be resolved Interface Evaluator Date I

I My comments/input have been properly Incorporated and/or addressed.

Interface Evaluator Date Required for Engineering Organizations

FustEnegj, Page 1 of 3 DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation

- PRDC-0015, A 02 Propoaed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

40/0 CH BVl To: Interfacing Organization Maintenance - Procedures From/Return To: Responsible Engineer Chatterjee, Pan D

BV2 Point of Contact Swartz, R

>>B GO Mail Stop Mail Stop PY-A165 PY Due Date 08/21/2008 Phone 440-280-5209 DESCRIPTION Of CHANCE/AREAS OF CONCERN Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are in draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SV1-R42-T5212 and SV1-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

DIRC IMPACTS (Evaluate impact identified by the following questions from the Design interface Checklist)

Topic / Ques No.

QUESTION 1.1/1 Does the change impact any Maintenance procedure ?

Examples include Corrective or Preventive maintenance procedures impacted by changes in stock codes or special tools or processes.

IMPACT:

Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are in draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SVI-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for Impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

OTHER IMPACT*

(Evaluate impact from the following General and Subject Matter Expert level questions)

QUESTION Describe affect of proposed change on existing design basis.

IMPACT: Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are in draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SV1-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for Impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Describe Impact on operational configuration, system Interactions, and any other pertinent considerations.

Identify required actions.

IMPACT: Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are In draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SVT-R42-T5212 and SVI-R42-TS214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Page 2 of 3 DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation

- PRDC-0015, A 02 Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

40/0 Describe the affect on the current licensing basis for the system / structure / component (SSC) involved.

IMPACT: Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SV1-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are in draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SVI-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for Impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

IF the change will add, modify, or delete equipment, components, systems, or processes that result In the need for personnel to acquire additional skills and knowledge, THEN complete the Affected Documents section below.

Identify Training as the Document Type, assign an Action Code, and Responsible Organization.

IMPACT: Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The Instructions are currently on hold and are in draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SV1-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Identify any limitations such as open assumptions or engineering holds.

Identify what is restrained and what is required to release the hold.

/

IMPACT: Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SV1-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are in draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SVI-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for Impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Identify appropriate installation requirements and acceptance criteria for testing.

IMPACT: Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1

SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are in draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SVI-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for Impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Identify potential failure mechanisms and failure consequences IMPACT: Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1

SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are in draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PROC-0015.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SV1-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Identify relevant design criteria and standards (including applicable revision/addenda).

IMPACT: Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SV1-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are In draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SVI-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for Impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Page 3 of 3 DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation

- PRDC-OOIS, A 02 Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

40/0 COMMENTS/ADDTIONAL INPUT/ INFORMATION (Include observations, recommendations & suggestions not provided In response to the above questions)

Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are In draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-OOIS.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SVI-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for Impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

AFFECTED DOCUMENTS UST List new and/or existing documents requiring issue/update as a result of this activity (e.g., drawings, procedures, databases, lesson plans, and vendor manuals).

It is presumed the latest revision/version of the document was used when identifying the impact.

Document Type Proced.,

non-eng Proced.,

non-eng Document ID Unit SVI-R42-T5212 Enter Document Here Enter Document Here SVI-R42-TS214 1

1 Rev.

7 6

Version Document Owner/

Responsible Organization Maintenance

- Procedures Maintenance

- Procedures Affected Functional Location(s)

Enter FLOC Enter FLOC Enter FLOC Enter FLOC Action Code*

5 5

Tracking Number**

CR 08-39315 NA NA CR 08-39315

• Action Codes:

1

- Required for Operational Acceptance 2 - Required for Implementation. Requires an Engineering Hold per NOP-CC-2003 3 - Required to be issued concurrent with the change package 4 - Required for closeout of the activity 5 - Later - can be completed when responsible organization deems appropriate. "Requires a SAP Notification number l~1 Interface Not Required (Provide Justification)

I I

Interface Provided (Indicate If Final Review Required^

Final Review Required Approval * * * (Print Name and Sign) 11 Comments need to be resolved 1

1 My comments/input have been properly Incorporated and/or addressed.

Interface Evaluator Interface Evaluator Date Date Required for Engineering Organizations

CALCULATION ADDENDUM NOP-CC-3002-02 Rev. 05 Pg1of2 CALCULATION NO. PRDC-0015 INITIATING DOCUMENT CA 08-44299-1 CALCULATION REV.

2 ADDENDUM NO.

A 02 D

BV1 1

D BV2 DB PY TITLE/

SUBJECT:

(MUST MATCH ORIGINAL CALCULATION TITLE (SUBJECT))

Division 2,125 VDC System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing Calculation Classification Tier 1 Calculation Safety-Related/Augmented Quality D

Nonsafety-Related Open Assumptions?

Yes No If Yes, Enter Tracking Number N/A Initiating Document CA 08-44299-1 (Perry & Davis-Besse Only)

Referenced In Atlas?

I Yes U No (Perry Only)

Referenced In USAR Validation Database Yes No Computer Program(S)

Program Name Version / Revision Category Status Description DCSDM 3.0.

B Active Direct Current System Database Module Originator (Print, Sign & Datey^

• y&/0 Reviewer/Design VerifierfP/fnf, Sign & Date)

PARI CHATTERJEE)

ApproverfPrint, Sign RAY TANNEY /

OBJECTIVE OR PURPOSE OF ADDENDUM:

/

Revise allowable voltage for Battery SVI Load Profile in section 4.6.4~of the calculation as shown in Attachment 1.

SCOPE OF ADDENDUM:

CR 08-44299 identified that Unit 2 Division 2 Battery Service Test did not meet the allowable voltage as shown in the SVI which is derived from Section 4.6.4 of this calculation Addendum A01, R/2.

As a result of this CR, Division 2 battery SVI allowable voltage as shown in Section 4.6.4, Addendum A01, R/2 of this calculation will be changed as shown in Attachment LIST NEW DOCUMENTS TO BE ADDED TO THE DOCUMENT INDEX (DIN).

DIN No.

1 DocumentNumber/Title,EvaluationofDivision2BatterySVIAllowableVoltage Revision,Edition,Date N/A Reference D

D Input El

Output

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS OF ADDENDUM:

The revised load profile for section 4.6.4 is shown in Attachment 1.

There is no change or impact on battery/battery charger sizing, device voltage and overall results and conclusion of the calculation.

There is no change to USAR Table 8.3-7 load profile currents.

Therefore, this Addendum does not change or impact USAR Table 8.3-7.

Results of this Addendum will be used to revise the appropriate Division 1 battery SVIs.

LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS CREATED BY ADDENDUM:

None IMPACT OF ADDENDUM ON OUTPUT DOCUMENTS:

There is no change or impact on USAR Table 8.3-7.

The affected SVIs will be revised per results of this Addendum.

Reviewed the other two output documents PRDC-0012 and PSTG-0001 and found no impact on these documents by this Addendum.

DESCRIBE WHERE THE ADDENDUM WILL BE EVALUATED FOR 10CFR50.59 APPLICABILITY:

RrstEnergy CALCULATION ADDENDUM NOP-CC-3002-02 Rev. 05 Pg 2 of 2 CALCULATION NO. PRDC-0015 INITIATING DOCUMENT CA 08-44299-1 CALCULATION REV.

2 ADDENDUM NO.

A 02 There is no change in Battery/Battery Charger sizing, load evaluation and device voltage drop by this Addendum.

There is no impact on calculation results and conclusion by this Addendum.

Therefore, the 10CFR50.59 Evaluation 08-02693 (RAD &

Screen only) for R/3 of this calculation is also applicable for this Addendum.

LIST SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: (Include total number of pages)

DIS - 3 Pages, DIEs - 5 Pages, DVR -1 Page, Calc Review Checklist - 3 Pages.

LIST ATTACHMENTS: (Include total number of pages) -

1 Page -1 Page to PRDC-0015. R/2. API 4.6.4 USAR TABLE 8.3.7 LOAD PROFILE USAR Table 8.3-7 provides the DC load profile for Division 2 battery for the design basis accident scenario.

Service tests (per SVIs) for the batteries are performed utilizing the load profile from Table 8.3-7.

The Battery load profile in this Addendum has both the current and the voltage information and is shown in Attachment 2 of this Addendum.

The current at different nodes is obtained from Attachment G of the calculation.

The voltage is based on worst case minimum acceptable voltage of the components and adding the cable drop between the components and the battery.

See Attachment 2 for detail evaluation.

These currents and voltages were increased to account for measuring instrument error of 0.5 volts [Typical Fluke Model 77 error is +/-(0.3% of Reading +

1 LSD)] for this load profile The load profile below is per IEEE Std. 450-1995, Paragraph 6.6 for Service Tests which states that the test should not be corrected for temperature or age, if the battery was sized in accordance with IEEE Std 485-1983 that already accounts for margin for age and temperature.

The batteries are sized per above referenced IEEE Std. for discharge voltage of 105 volts in this calculation.

To support this load profile, the battery sizing was recalculated per above IEEE Std. for discharge voltage of 1.92 volts/cell (115.2 battery volts) accounting for aging and temperature correction and found to have adequate margin. shows the battery sizing worksheet for Division 2 battery using the 1.92 volts per cell discharge curve.

The revised load profile is as follows:

Period 1

is - 0 to 1min -Duration 1 min ->>210 amp and voltage is s 113 volts Period 2 is -1 to 2 min ->>Duration 1 min -+ 105 amp and voltage is a 113 volts Period 3 is - 2 to 3 min -> Duration 1 min -* 125 amp and voltage is s 113 volts Period 4 is - 3 to 10 min -* Duration 7 min -> 105 amp and voltage is fc 113 volts Period 5 is -10 to 11 min ->> Duration 1 min -+ 125 amp and voltage is & 113 volts Period 6 is -11 to 119 min ->> Duration 108 min ->>105 amp and voltage is 2 113 volts Period 7 is -119 to 120 min -> Duration 1 min -125 amp and voltage is a 116.5 volts CHANGES FOR THIS ADDENDUM ARE SHOWN BOLD Pglofl

Evaluation of Division 2 Minimum Required Voltage Evaluation 1

Device SPCHGM-1-EH1201-F22 SPCHGM-1-EH1212-F22 SOL-1E51-F425 SOL-1-C11-1F110B RLY-1E12-K3B RLY-1B21-K6B/K7B/K8B RLY-1E12-K110B10.12 ARI-1C11F160B/F162D/F162B/F1 63B RLY-1R43-TD1A RLY-1R43-TD1B CNTCTR-K1 RLY-2P47-K2LL/K3/K95 PWRSUP-1C95-RACK 1,2 2

Node/Panel Sw#

13 13 ED1B08. Sw#1 ED1B08, Sw#2 ED1B08. Sw#5 ED1B08, Sw#7 ED1B08, Sw<<8 ED1B08, Sw#14 ED1B06, Sw#7 ED1B06. Sw#8 ED1B06, Sw#9 ED1B06, Sw#12 ED1B06, Sw#15 3

Time Step 5

27 W

W W

W W

W W

W W

W 4

Load Step 1

7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-6 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 5

Battery Voltage 117.669 118.056 117 669 117.669 117.669 117 669 117.669 117669 117669 117669 117.669 117669 117 669 6

Node Voltage 115.49 11591 116 81 116.81 116.81 116.81 116.81 116.357 116.764 116.764 116 206 116.764 116.764 7

Device Voltage 85.99 82 25 1149 112.83 109.81 113 89 11212 95 89 108.33 108 04 107 48 1145 110 07 8

Required Voltage 80 80 100 105 100 100 100 90 100 100 100 100 100 9

Batt

- Node Drop 2179 2146 0.859 0.859 0 859 0 859 0.859 1.312 0905 0.905 1463 0.905 0.905 10 Node - Load Drop 29.5 33 66 191 398 7

2.92 469 20 467 8.434 8 724 8.726 2264 6694 Details of the Spreadsheet:

1) Breaker EH1212 is required to close at 1 HR 59 MIN when the SPCHGM charges and the Node voltage is 115.91 from Attachment B, PRDC-0015, R/2.

2) Column 1 - Devices in each switch that has lowest margin, obtained from Attachment L1, PRDC-0015, R/2 SPCHGM that are operated during an accident condition were only consic

3) Column 2-Node numbers from PRDC-0015, R/2, Attachment B for SPCHGM For remaining devices that has minimum device voltage for each switch in ED1B06and ED1B08pan<

L1.

4) Column 3 - Calculation Time Step from PRDC-0015, R/2. "W indicates time step with worst case minimum voltage was usec

5) Column 4 - Applicable SVI Load Step.

6) Column 5 - Battery voltage obtained from Attachment F of PRDC-0015, R/2

7) Column 6 - Node voltage obtained from Attachment B of PRDC-0015. R/2

8) Column 7 - Device voltac

9) Column 8 - Required voll

11) Column 10 - Voltage drt

12) Column 11

- Minimum P Devices selected above An M&TE accuracy error of Therefore, considering diag Therefore, considering diag

<< for SPCHGM is from Attachment 1 and B Device voltages for the remaining devices are from Attachment L1 of PRDC-0015, R/2.

age for SPCHGM is from Section 5 2 of PRDC-0015, R/2 based on site results. For all other devices from Attachment L1

> between Battery and the Node (Column 5 - Column 6).

>p between Node and the device (Column 6 - Column 7) equired Battery Voltage at the device is Column 8 + Column 9 + Column 10 0 5V is being used This is consistant with calculation PRDC-0015 nostic instrument accuracy the minimum required voltage is for Step 1-6111.779 + 05=112.279 >> 113 volts for SVI Testing, nostic instrument accuracy the minimum required voltage is for Step 7 is 115.8+0.5 = 116.34 >>116.5 volts for SVI Testing I

I 11 Mm Required Battery Vottage 111679 115.806 102 769 109.839 107.859 103 779 105.549 111.779 109 339 109.629 110189 103.169 107 599 lered to Calc PROC-0015, A 02

DESIGN VERIFICATION RECORD Page 1 of 1 NOP-CC-2001-01 Rev. 00 SECTION I: TO BE COMPLETED BYDESIGN ORIGINATOR DOCUMENT(S)/ACTIVITY TO BE VERIFIED:

PRDC-0015, Revision 2, Addendum 02 SAFETY RELATED AUGMENTED QUALITY NONSAFETY RELATED SUPPORTING/REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Calculation Review Checklist DESIGN ORIGINATOR: (Print and Sign Name)

Pan Chatterjee /

DATE SECTION II:

TO BE COMPLETED BY VERIF4ER VERIFICATION METHOD (Check one)

E DESIGN REVIEW (Complete Design Review Checklist or Calculation Review Checklist)

D ALTERNATE CALCULATION I QUALIFICATION TESTING JUSTIFICATION FOR SUPERVISOR PERFORMING VERIFICATION:

N/A APPROVAL:

(Print and Sign Name)

N/A DATE EXTENT OF VERIFICATION:

A review of PRDC-0015 R/2 was performed, and the sources of the numbers used in Attachment 2 of the addendum were verified.

The calculation methodology outlined in the text of Attachment 2 as reviewed and found to be applicable.

A complete check of mathematical calculations was performed with no errors found.

Lastly it was confirmed that the results from the calculations in Attachment 2were correctly revised in the SVI Load Profile shown on Attachment 1 of the addendum.

COMMENTS, ERRORS OR DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED?

YES NO RESOLUTION: (For Alternate Calculation or Qualification Testing only)

RESOLVED BY: (Print and Sign Name)

N/A DATE VERIFIER: (Print and Sign Name)

RyanMBriggs/

DATE 9/t/o*

APPROVED BY:

Ray Tanney /

DATE

rfns§Cfjfuy CALCULATION REVIEW CHECKLIST NOP-CC-2001-04 Rev. 05 QUESTION General 1

Does the stated objective/purpose clearly describe why the calculation is being performed?

2.

Are design input / output documents and references listed and clearly identified in the document index, including edition and addenda, where applicable?

3.

Were verbal inputs from third parties properly documented?

4.

Are design input parameters, such as physical and geometric characteristic and regulatory or code and standard requirements, accurately taken from the design input documents and correctly incorporated, including tolerances and units?

5.

Are the design inputs relevant, current, consistent with design/licensing bases and directly applicable to the purpose of the calculation, including appropriate tolerances and ranges/modes of operation?

6.

Are all design inputs retrievable?

If not, have they been added as attachments?

7.

Are preliminary or conceptual inputs clearly identified for later confirmation as open assumptions?

8.

Where applicable, were construction and operating considerations included as input information?

9.

Were design input / output documents properly updated to reference this calculation?

ASSUMPTIONS 10.

Have the assumptions necessary to perform the analysis been clearly identified and adequately described?

11.

Are all assumptions for the calculation reasonable and consistent with design/licensing bases?

12.

Have all open assumptions needing later confirmation been clearly identified on the Calculation cover sheet, including when the open assumption needs to be closed?

13.

Has an SAP Activity Initiation Form been created for open assumptions?

14.

Have engineering judgments been clearly identified?

15.

Are engineering judgments reasonable and adequately documented?

16.

Is suitable justification provided for all assumptions/engineering judgements (except those based upon recognized engineering practice, physical constants or elementary scientific principles)?

Method of Analysis 17.

Is the method used appropriate considering the purpose and type of calculation?

18.

Is the method in accordance with applicable codes, standards, and design/licensing bases?

Identification of Computer Codes (Ref: NOP-SS-1001) 19.

Have the versions of the computer codes employed in the design analysis been certified for this application?

20.

Are codes property identified along with source (vendor, organization, etc.)?

21.

Is the code applicable for the analysis being performed?

22.

Is the computer program(s) being used listed on the FENOC Usable Software List for the site?

NA X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X X

Yes X

X X

X X

X X

X X

No Page 1 of 3 CALCULATION NO.

PRDC-0015 REV.

02 ADDENDUM NO.

02 UNIT 1&2 COMMENTS RESOLUTION

ftreffihgfgy CALCULATION REVIEW CHECKLIST NOP-CC-2001-04 Rev. 05 QUESTION 23.

Does the computer model, that has been created, adequately reflect actual (or to be modified) plant conditions (e.g., dimensional accuracy, type of model/code options used, time steps, etc.)?

24.

Did the computer output generate any ERROR or WARNING Messages that could invalidate the results?

25.

Is the computer output reasonable when compared to inputs and what was expected?

Computations 26.

Are the equations used consistent with recognized engineering practice and design/licensing bases?

27.

Is there a reasonable justification provided for the uses of any equations not in common use?

28.

Were the mathematical operations performed properly and the results accurate?

29.

Have adjustment factors, uncertainties, empirical correlations, etc., used in the analysis been correctly applied?

30.

Is the result presented with proper units and tolerance?

31.

Has proper consideration been given to results that may be overly sensitive to very small changes in input?

Conclusions 32:

Is the magnitude of the result reasonable and expected when compared to inputs?

33.

Is there a reasonable justification provided for deviations from the acceptance criteria?

34.

Are stated conclusions justifiable based on the calculation results?

35.

Are all pages sequentially numbered and marked with a valid calculation and revision number?

36.

Is all information legible and reproducible?

37.

Is the calculation presentation complete and understandable without any need to refer back to the Originator for clarification or explanations?

38.

Is calculation format presented in a logical and orderly manner, in conformance with the standard calculation content of NOP-CC-3002 (Attachment 1)?

39.

Have all changes in the documentation been initialed (or signed) and dated by the author of the change and all required reviewers?

Design/Licensing 40.

Have all calculation results stayed within existing design/licensing basis parameters?

41.

If the response to Question 40 is NO, has Licensing been notified as appropriate? (i.e.

UFSAR or Tech Spec Change Request has been initiated).

42.

Is the direction of trends reasonable?

43.

Has the calculation Preparer used all applicable design information/requirements provided?

44.

Did the calculation Preparer determine if the calculation was referenced in design basis documents and/or databases?

45.

Did the Preparer determine if the calculation was used as a reference in the UFSAR?

46.

If the calculation is used as a reference in the UFSAR, is a change to the UFSAR required or an update to the UFSAR Validation Database, if applicable, required?

47.

If the answer to Question 46 is YES, have the appropriate documents been initiated?

NA X

X X

X X

X X

X Yes X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X No X

Page 2 of 3 CALCULATION NO.

PRDC-0015 REV.

02 ADDENDUM NO.

02 UNIT 1&2 COMMENTS RESOLUTION

rtrsttji&uy CALCULATION REVIEW CHECKLIST NOP-CC-2001-04 Rev. 05 QUESTION 48.

Has the applicability of 10CFR50.59 to this calculation been considered and documented?

Acceptable 49.

Does the calculation meet its purpose/objective?

50.

Is the calculation acceptable for use?

51.

What checking method was used to review the calculation?

Check all that apply.

spot check for math complete check for math comparison with tests check by alternate method comparison with previous calculation 52.

If the calculation was prepared by a vendor, does it comply with the technical and quality requirements described in the Procurement Documents?

Reference the Purchase Order number or other procurement document number in the Comments Section of this question.

53.

Have Professional Engineer (PE) certification requirements been addressed and documented where required by ASME Code (if applicable).

NA X

X Yes X

X X

X No CALCULATION NO.

PRDC-00 REV.

02 ADDENDUM NO.

02 UNIT 1&2 COMMENTS Page 3 of 3 15 RESOLUTION Review Summary:

Addendum 02 to PRDC-0015, Revision 2 is complete and accurate and is acceptable for use.

Technical Review (Print and Sign Name)

N/A Design Verificati Ryan M Briggs /

t on (Print and Sign Name)

Date Date Owner's Acceptance Review (Required for calculations prepared by a vendor)

Reviewer (Print and Sign Name)

N/A Approver (Print am1 Sign Name)

Date Date

FirstEnerw DIE BV1 l

1 Interface Organization DESIGN INTERFACE

SUMMARY

NOP-CC-2004-09 BV2 l

l PY l X l Subject Matter Area Page 1 of 3 Calculation No.

PRDC-0015, A 02 Rev. No o

Department Name r

SMA#

Subject Matter Area Title Chemistry - Environmental 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 6.11 Special Interests, Chemical / Environmental 6.3 Special Interests, Plant Controls - Human Factors 28 19 20 Chemistry - Plant Chemistry 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts Design Eng - Configuration Control 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts Design Eng - Elec / lac, Misc Electrical 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 3.1 Electrical Systems, Misc Electrical Interfaces 6.1 Special Interests, FIRE Protection / Safe Shutdown 6.3 Special Interests, Plant Controls - Human Factors 51 Design Eng - Elec / lac, Misc I&C 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 4.1 Instruments & Controls, Misc I&C Interfaces 81 Design Eng - Elec / I&C, Security Systems 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 6.6 Special Interests, Radiation Protection

- ALARA 52 Design Eng - Elec / I&C, Safe Shutdown 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 3.1 Electrical Systems, Misc Electrical Interfaces 6.1 Special Interests, FIRE Protection / Safe Shutdown Design Eng - Engineering Analysis, Misc.

1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 5.3 Structures & Structural, Materials 6.2 Special Interests, Rx Containment Bldg & Drywell 6.3 Special Interests, Plant Controls - Human Factors 6.8 Special Interests, Internal Missile Hazards 6.9 Special Interests, Reactivity Ctrl, Accident, & Core Reload Analysis 2

67 21 Design Eng - Engineering Analysis, PSA 6.5 Special Interests, PSA - Probabilistic Safety Assessment Design Eng, Mech / Structural - Buildings ft Struct 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts Design Eng, Mech / Structural - Misc. Mechanical 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 5.3 Structures & Structural, Materials 6.2 Special Interests, Rx Containment Bldg & Drywell 6.7 Special Interests, NSSS Design Basis 60 Design Eng, Mech / Structural - Misc. Structural 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 5.1 Structures & Structural, Misc Structural Interfaces 5.2 Structures & Structural, Seismic Considerations 6.2 Special Interests, Rx Containment Bldg & Drywell 65 Design Eng, Mech / Structural - Seismic 3.1 Electrical Systems, Misc Electrical Interfaces 5.2 Structures & Structural, Seismic Considerations 9

18 Emergency Response 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts Industrial Safety 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts

DIE DESIGN INTERFACE

SUMMARY

NOP-CC-2004-09 BV1 ___

Calculation No.

Page 2 of 3 PRDC-0015, A 02 BV2 Interface Organization Subject Matter Area Department Name r

SMA#

Subject Matter Area Title 40 48 33 Maintenance -

17 i.i Maintenance -

1.2 Maintenance -

1.1 1.2 Procedures General Interfaces, Support Programs General Interfaces, Work Planning General Interfaces, General Interfaces, Departments / Units General Impacts Departments / Units General Impacts Operations - Unit 1 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 5.2 Structures & Structural, Seismic Considerations 6.3 Special Interests, Plant Controls

- Human Factors 6 9 Special Interests, Reactivity Ctrl, Accident, & Core Reload Analysis 54 30 22 76 24 77 7

42 59 55 80 56 57 58 Operations Services - Fire Marshal 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 6.1 Special Interests, FIRE Protection / Safe Shutdown Operations Services - Procedures 1.1 General Interfaces, Departments / Units 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts Plant & Equip Reliability Eng l7 1.1 General Interfaces, Departments / Units 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces Plant & Equip Reliability Eng - Cyber Security 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 6 3 Special Interests, Plant Controls - Human Factors Plant & Equip Reliability Eng - Reactor Eng 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 6.9 Special Interests, Reactivity Ctrl, Accident, & Core Reload Analysis Project Management - Refueling Engineering 6.10 Special Interests, Refueling Equipment & Rx Assembly Radiation Protection 6.6 Special Interests, Radiation Protection

- ALARA Site Protection 1.2 6.6 Tech Svcs Eng, 3.1 6.2

- Operations General Interfaces, General Impacts Special Interests, Radiation Protection

- ALARA Eng Programs - Appendix 3 Electrical Systems, Misc Electrical Interfaces Special Interests, Rx Containment Bldg & Drywell Tech Svcs Eng, Eng Programs - EQ 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 3.1 Electrical Systems, Misc Electrical Interfaces Tech Svcs Eng, 2.1 Tech Svcs Eng, 1.2 2.1 Tech Svcs Eng, 1.2 2.1 Tech Svcs Eng, 6.4 Eng Programs - FAC Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces Eng Programs - ISI General Interfaces, General Impacts Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces Eng Programs - 1ST, NDE, Boric Add General Interfaces, General Impacts Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces Eng Programs - Maintenance Rule Special Interests, Maintenance Rule 10CFR 50.65 27 Tech Svcs Eng, Eng Programs - Misc Programs

FirstB DESIGN INTERFACE

SUMMARY

NOP-CC-2004-09 BV1 BV2 DIE L_Q_

Page 3 of 3 PRDC-0015, A 02 Interface Organization Subject Matter Area Department Name SMA#

Subject Matter Area Title 1.2 2.1 General Interfaces, General Impacts Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces 46 Training - Services 1.1 General Interfaces, Departments / Units 2.1 Mechanical Systems, Misc Mechanical Interfaces Training - Simulator 1.1 General Interfaces, Departments / Units 1.2 General Interfaces, General Impacts 6.3 Special Interests, Plant Controls - Human Factors Comments This Addendum revises battery SVI load profile allowable voltage.

Review of the DIRC indicates that no DIE from Training and Operations Procedure is necessary or required for this activity.

The calculation is prepared by Electrical personnel and question on Electrical System has been considered and addressed in the calculation.

In summary, none of the above disciplines except the above two requires a design Interface for this adda<<flfrn.

t Prepared By:

[chatterjee, Date:

Page 1 of 2 DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation - PRDC-0015, A 02 Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

22/0

BV1 To: Interfacing Organization Plant & Equip Reliability Eng From/Return To: Responsible Engineer Chatterfee, Part

BV2 Point of Contact Kuntz, Marc

<<>B Mall Stop PY-A2S0 Mall Stop PY-A16S PY Due Date 08/21/2008 Phone 440-280-5209 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE/AREAS OF CONCERN PRDC 0015 Rev.2 Addendum 2 provides for a minimum acceptable Div. 2 battery terminal voltage of 113VDC for the first six periods of the battery load profile and a minimum acceptable battery terminal voltage of 116.5VDC for the seventh period of the battery load profile.

DIRC IMPACT?st (Evaluate impact identified by the following questions from the Design Interface Checklist)

Topic / Ques No.

QUESTION 1.1/3 Does the change impact any Plant Engineering NSSS (Nuclear Steam Supply), BOP (Balance Of Plant), Engineering Electrical & Controls, OR Plant Computer System SSC ?

IMPACT:

OTHER IMPACTS (Evaluate impact from the following General and Subject Matter Expert level questions)

QUESTION Identify potential failure mechanisms and failure consequences IMPACT: Not within the scope of this review.

Identify any limitations such as open assumptions or engineering holds.

Identify what is restrained and what is required to release the hold.

IMPACT: Not within the scope of this review.

Describe affect of proposed change on existing design basis.

IMPACT: Not within the scope of this evalaution.

Describe the affect on the current licensing basis for the system / structure / component (SSC) involved.

IMPACT: Not within the scope of this review.

Describe impact on operational configuration, system interactions, and any other pertinent considerations.

Identify required actions.

IMPACT: 1. This calculation revision for battery loading makes no physical changes to the plant DC system. Thus system installation and configuration are unchanged.

2. Since no physical changes are being made to the plant Dc system, there Is no system operational impact and no change to system maintenance requirements.

3. No component repetitive calibrations need to be added or revised. 4. No SAP functional location or component classification Is affected by this calculation revision.

5. Because there Is no impact on system configuration, operation or maintenance requirements, no performance monitoring plans or Maintenance Rule functions are affected.

IF the change will add, modify, or delete equipment, components, systems, or processes that result fn the need for personnel to acquire additional skills and knowledge, THEN complete the Affected Documents section below.

Identify Training as the Document Type, assign an Action Code, and Responsible Organization.

IMPACT: 6. No procedures under the control of PES are affected by this calculation revision.

Identify appropriate Installation requirements and acceptance criteria for testing.

IMPACT: 7. A calculation revision Is being reviewed, nothing is being Installed or physically changed, thus Installation requirements are not necessary. This calculation revision changes the acceptance criteria for Division 2 Battery Service Tests. The test Instructions are under the control of the Maintenance Dept. and will be revised accordingly. Test methodology and frequency are not changed. The revised acceptance limits will be verified as part of routine battery testing. 8. Because nothing is being procured, no enhanced procurement requirements are necessary. No vendor is involved In this calculation revision, so vendor oversight Is not applicable.

Identify relevant design criteria and standards (Including applicable revision/addenda).

IMPACT: Not within the scope of this review.

COMMENTS/ADDTIONAL INPUT/ INFORMATION (Include observations, recommendations & suggestions not provided in response to the above questions)

MB*/

Page 2 of 2 DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation

- PRDC-0015, A 02 Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

22/0 AFFECTED DOCUMENTS UST List new and/or existing documents requiring issue/update as a result of this activity (e.g., drawings, procedures, databases, lesson plans, and vendor manuals). It Is presumed the latest revision/version of the document was used when identifying the impact.

Document Type Document ID Unit 1

Rev.

Version Document Owner/

Responsible Organization Affected Functional Locatlon(s)

Action Code*

Tracking Number"

'Action Codes:

1 - Required for Operational Acceptance 2

- Required for Implementation. Requires an Engineering Hold per NOP-CC-2003 3

- Required to be issued concurrent with the change package 4 - Required for closeout of the activity 5 - Later - can be completed when responsible organization deems appropriate. "'Requires a SAP Notification number I

I Interface Not Required (Provide Justification)

Interface Provided (Indicate if Final Review Required) l l

Final Review Required Date Approval*** (Print 08/08/2008 Interface Evalqajtor (Print ttfme and Sign)

Slack, Bill I

I Comments need to be resolved Interface Evaluator Date I

I My comments/input have been properly Incorporated and/or addressed.

Interface Evaluator Date Required for Engineering Organizations

FustEnegj, Page 1 of 3 DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation

- PRDC-0015, A 02 Propoaed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

40/0 CH BVl To: Interfacing Organization Maintenance - Procedures From/Return To: Responsible Engineer Chatterjee, Pan D

BV2 Point of Contact Swartz, R

>>B GO Mail Stop Mail Stop PY-A165 PY Due Date 08/21/2008 Phone 440-280-5209 DESCRIPTION Of CHANCE/AREAS OF CONCERN Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are in draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SV1-R42-T5212 and SV1-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

DIRC IMPACTS (Evaluate impact identified by the following questions from the Design interface Checklist)

Topic / Ques No.

QUESTION 1.1/1 Does the change impact any Maintenance procedure ?

Examples include Corrective or Preventive maintenance procedures impacted by changes in stock codes or special tools or processes.

IMPACT:

Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are in draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SVI-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for Impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

OTHER IMPACT*

(Evaluate impact from the following General and Subject Matter Expert level questions)

QUESTION Describe affect of proposed change on existing design basis.

IMPACT: Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are in draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SV1-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for Impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Describe Impact on operational configuration, system Interactions, and any other pertinent considerations.

Identify required actions.

IMPACT: Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are In draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SVT-R42-T5212 and SVI-R42-TS214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Page 2 of 3 DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation

- PRDC-0015, A 02 Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

40/0 Describe the affect on the current licensing basis for the system / structure / component (SSC) involved.

IMPACT: Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SV1-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are in draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SVI-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for Impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

IF the change will add, modify, or delete equipment, components, systems, or processes that result In the need for personnel to acquire additional skills and knowledge, THEN complete the Affected Documents section below.

Identify Training as the Document Type, assign an Action Code, and Responsible Organization.

IMPACT: Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The Instructions are currently on hold and are in draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SV1-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Identify any limitations such as open assumptions or engineering holds.

Identify what is restrained and what is required to release the hold.

/

IMPACT: Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SV1-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are in draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SVI-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for Impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Identify appropriate installation requirements and acceptance criteria for testing.

IMPACT: Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1

SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are in draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SVI-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for Impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Identify potential failure mechanisms and failure consequences IMPACT: Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1

SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are in draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PROC-0015.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SV1-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Identify relevant design criteria and standards (including applicable revision/addenda).

IMPACT: Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SV1-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are In draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-0015.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SVI-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for Impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Page 3 of 3 DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Modification/Document/Activity ID Calculation

- PRDC-OOIS, A 02 Proposed Rev.

0 DIE No./Rev.

40/0 COMMENTS/ADDTIONAL INPUT/ INFORMATION (Include observations, recommendations & suggestions not provided In response to the above questions)

Division 2 Battery Service Tests are conducted with:

SVI-R42-T5212, Division 2, Unit 1 SVI-R42-T5214, Division 2, Unit 2 The instructions are currently on hold and are In draft form awaiting the completion of changes to PRDC-OOIS.

SVI-R42-T5212 and SVI-R42-T5214 will be revised and released from Admin hold following the completion of PRDC-0015.

Reviewed for Impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

AFFECTED DOCUMENTS UST List new and/or existing documents requiring issue/update as a result of this activity (e.g., drawings, procedures, databases, lesson plans, and vendor manuals).

It is presumed the latest revision/version of the document was used when identifying the impact.

Document Type Proced.,

non-eng Proced.,

non-eng Document ID Unit SVI-R42-T5212 Enter Document Here Enter Document Here SVI-R42-TS214 1

1 Rev.

7 6

Version Document Owner/

Responsible Organization Maintenance

- Procedures Maintenance

- Procedures Affected Functional Location(s)

Enter FLOC Enter FLOC Enter FLOC Enter FLOC Action Code*

5 5

Tracking Number**

CR 08-39315 NA NA CR 08-39315

• Action Codes:

1

- Required for Operational Acceptance 2 - Required for Implementation. Requires an Engineering Hold per NOP-CC-2003 3 - Required to be issued concurrent with the change package 4 - Required for closeout of the activity 5 - Later - can be completed when responsible organization deems appropriate. "Requires a SAP Notification number l~1 Interface Not Required (Provide Justification)

I I

Interface Provided (Indicate If Final Review Required^

Final Review Required Approval * * * (Print Name and Sign) 11 Comments need to be resolved 1

1 My comments/input have been properly Incorporated and/or addressed.

Interface Evaluator Interface Evaluator Date Date Required for Engineering Organizations