ML15112A496

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards SE of TR DPC-NE-2005P, Use of BWU-Z Critical Heat Flux Correlation for Mark-B11 Fuel. Rept Acceptable
ML15112A496
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/08/1999
From: Labarge D
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Mccollum W
DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML15112A497 List:
References
TAC-M98660, TAC-M98661, TAC-M98662, NUDOCS 9906110141
Download: ML15112A496 (3)


Text

June 8, 1999 Mr. W. R. McCollum, Jr.

Distribution:

T.Huang Vice President, Oconee Site Docket File e-mail RScholl - SE only Duke Energy Corporation PUBLIC OGC P. O. Box 1439 PD 11-1 R/F ACRS Seneca, SC 29679 J. Zwolinski/S.Black C.Ogle, RII

SUBJECT:

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 RE: TOPICAL REPORT NUMBER DPC-NE-2005P USE OF BWU-Z CRITICAL HEAT FLUX CORRELATION FOR MARK-B1 1 FUEL (TAC NOS. M98660, M98661, AND M98662)

Dear Mr. McCollum:

By letter dated April 22, 1997, and supplemented by letters dated September 21, 1998, and May 13, 1999, Duke Energy Corporation requested NRC review and approval of the use of the BWU-Z Critical Heat Flux Correlation for Mark-B1 1 Fuel, which is described in Appendix D to Topical Report DPC-NE-2005P, "Duke Power Company Thermal - Hydraulic Statistical Core Design Methodology." The submittal contains analyses of the Mark-B1 1 fuel assemblies (which were analyzed using the BWU-Z critical heat flux correlation) and justifications for the specific uncertainties and distributions used in the application, and for the selected statepoints used to generate the statistical design limit.

The NRC staff was assisted in this review by its consultant, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Based on the information provided and the analysis and recommendations provided by PNNL, we find the proposed Appendix D to DPC-NE-2005P to be acceptable.

However, this approval is subject to the conditions described in the Safety Evaluation, which are also the commitments made in your letter dated May 13, 1999.

Sincerely, original signed by:

David E. LaBarge, Senior Project Manager, Section 1 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management

/

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270 and 50-287

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: See next page 9906110141990608 PDR ADOCK 05000269 P

PDR Document Name: G:\\PDII-1\\OCONEE\\OM98660.SE.WPD To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box:

"C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy OFFICE PM:

I LA:PDII/S1 e

SC:PDII/S1 NAME DI aLge:cn CHawes REmch DATE (p /7 /99

& /

/99

/ 3/99 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 June 8, 1999 Mr. W. R. McCollum, Jr.

Vice President, Oconee Site Duke Energy Corporation P. 0. Box 1439 Seneca, SC 29679

SUBJECT:

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION UN!TS 1, 2 AND 3 RE: TOPICAL REPORT NUMBER DPC-NE-2005P USE OF B,"U-Z CRITICAL HEAT FLUX CORRELATION FOR MARK-B1 1 FUEL (TAC NOS. M98660, M98661, AND M98662)

Dear Mr. McCollum:

By letter dated April 22,1997, and supplemented by letters dated September 21, 1998, and May 13, 1999, Duke Energy Corporation requested NRC review and approval of the use of the BWU-Z Critical Heat Flux Correlation for Mark-B1 1 Fuel, which is described in Appendix D to Topical Report DPC-NE-2005P, "Duke Power Company Thermal - Hydraulic Statistical Core Design Methodology." The submittal contains analyses of the Mark-B1 1 fuel assemblies (which were analyzed using the BWU-Z critical heat flux correlation) and justifications for the specific uncertainties and distributions used in the application, and for the selected statepoints used to generate the statistical design limit.

The NRC staff was assisted in this review by its consultant, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Based on the information provided and the analysis and recommendations provided by PNNL, we find the proposed Appendix D to DPC-NE-2005P to be acceptable.

However, this approval is subject to the conditions described in the Safety Evaluation, which are also the commitments made in your letter dated May 13, 1999.

Sincerely, David E. LaBarge, Senior Project Manager, Section 1 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270 and 50-287

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: See next page

Oconee Nuclear Station cc:

Ms. Lisa F. Vaughn Mr. J. E. Burchfield Legal Department (PBO5E)

Compliance Manager Duke Energy Corporation Duke Energy Corporation 422 South Church Street Oconee Nuclear Site Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1006 P. 0. Box 1439 Seneca, South Carolina 29679 Anne Cottington, Esquire Winston and Strawn Ms. Karen E. Long 1400 L Street, NW.

Assistant Attorney General Washington, DC 20005 North Carolina Department of Justice Mr. Rick N. Edwards P. 0. Box 629 Framatome Technologies Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Suite 525 1700 Rockville Pike L. A. Keller Rockville, Maryland 20852-1631 Manager - Nuclear Regulatory Licensing Manager, LIS Duke Energy Corporation NUS Corporation 526 South Church Street 2650 McCormick Drive, 3rd Floor Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1006 Clearwater, Florida 34619-1035 Mr. Richard M. Fry, Director Senior Resident Inspector Division of Radiation Protection U. S. Nuclear Regulatory North Carolina Department of Commission Environment, Health, and 7812B Rochester Highway Natural Resources Seneca, South Carolina 29672 3825 Barrett Drive Raleigh, North Carolina 27609-7721 Virgil. R. Autry, Director Division-of Radioactive Waste Management Mr. Steven P. Shaver Bureau of Land and Waste Management Senior Sales Engineer Department of Health and Environmental Westinghouse Electric Company Control 5929 Carnegie Blvd.

2600 Bull Street Suite 500 Columbia, South Carolina 29201-1708 Charlotte, North Carolina 28209 County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, South Carolina 29621