ML15112A254

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards SER of Topical Rept DPC-NE-3005-P, UFSAR Chapter 15 Transient Analysis Methodology, Submitted by Duke Energy Corp on 970730.Review of Topical Rept Finds Rept Acceptable with Some Exceptions,As Explained in SER
ML15112A254
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/01/1998
From: Labarge D
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Mccollum W
DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML15112A255 List:
References
TAC-M99349, TAC-M99350, TAC-M99351, NUDOCS 9810050251
Download: ML15112A254 (4)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 lo October 1, 1998 Mr. W. R. McCollum Vice President, Oconee Site Duke Energy Corporation P. 0. Box 1439 Seneca, SC 29679

SUBJECT:

REVIEW OF UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT, CHAPTER 15, TRANSIENT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY SUBMITTAL - OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 (TAC NOS. M99349, M99350, AND M99351)

Dear Mr. McCollum:

By letter dated July 30, 1997, Duke Energy Corporation (DEC) submitted Topical Report DPC-NE-3005-P, "UFSAR [Updated Final Safety Analysis Report] Chapter 15 Transient Analysis Methodology," for NRC staff review and approval. Additional information was supplied by DEC by letter dated July 23, 1993. The topical report describes the methodology DEC used to analyze the nonloss-of-coolant accident (non-LOCA) UFSAR Chapter 15 transients and accidents for the Oconee Nuclear Station (Oconee), Units 1, 2, and 3. The objective of this topical report is to implement a revised non-LOCA transient and accident analysis methodology and establish a new licensing basis for Oconee. As you explained in the submittal, most of the computer codes and simulation models referenced in the report have been previously reviewed by the staff and approved for application to the Oconee reload design and in response to Generic Letter 83-11. This topical report is a specific application of these models to the analysis of the Oconee UFSAR Chapter 15 transients and accidents.

The staff has reviewed the topical report and finds it acceptable with some exceptions, as explained in the enclosed safety evaluation. These exceptions have been discussed with your staff and will be addressed in a revision to the topical report that will be submitted for staff review and approval. As a result, staff activity concerning this topical report is not completed and will be reinitiated using new TAC numbers when the revision is received.

However, some of the methodology described in this topical report is also important in certain design basis considerations for conversion of the current Oconee Technical Specifications (TS) to the improved TS. The submittal for this conversion is under staff review (TAC Nos. M99912, 9810050251 981001O.

PDR ADOCK 05000269 P

PDR

W.

October 1, 1998 M99913, and M99914). All of the methodology needed for this application has been found to be acceptable, as described in the enclosed safety evaluation. This action closes TAC Nos.

M99349, M99350, and M99351.

Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

David E. LaBarge, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate 11-2 Division of Reactor Projects - 1/11 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/encl: See next page Distribution:

CYLiang COgle, Rll

.066ket' File TLH3 (e-mail SE only)

PUBLIC OGC PD 11-2 Rdg.

ACRS JZwolinski LPlisco, RII Document Name: G:\\OCONEE\\OCO99349.SE To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box:

"C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E = Copy with attachmentlenclosure "N" = No copy OFFICE PD1J?

NAME D

aL e:cn Berry Be w

DATE 9/zil98 I g/98

/98 (L/ /98 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

W. R. McCollum

-2 M99913, and M99914). All of the methodology needed for this application has been found to be acceptable, as described in the enclosed safety evaluation. This action closes TAC Nos.

M99349, M99350, and M99351.

Sincerely, David E. LaBarge, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate 11-2 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/encl: See next page

Oconee Nuclear Station cc:

Mr. Paul R. Newton Mr. J. E. Burchfield Legal Department (PBO5E)

Compliance Manager Duke Energy Corporation Duke Energy Corporation 422 South Church Street Oconee Nuclear Site Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1006 P. 0. Box 1439 Seneca, South Carolina 29679 J. Michael McGarry, Ill, Esquire Winston and Strawn Ms. Karen E. Long 1400 L Street, NW.

Assistant Attorney General Washington, DC 20005 North Carolina Department of Justice Mr. Rick N. Edwards P. 0. Box 629 Framatome Technologies Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Suite 525 1700 Rockville Pike L. A. Keller Rockville, Maryland 20852-1631 Manager - Nuclear Regulatory Licensing Manager, LIS Duke Energy Corporation NUS Corporation 526 South Church Street 2650 McCormick Drive, 3rd Floor Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1006 Clearwater, Florida 34619-1.035 Mr. Richard M. Fry, Director Senior Resident Inspector Division of Radiation Protection U. S. Nuclear Regulatory North Carolina Department of Commission Environment, Health, and 7812B Rochester Highway Natural Resources Seneca, South Carolina 29672 3825 Barrett Drive Raleigh, North Carolina 27609-7721 Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. Steven P. Shaver Atlanta Federal Center Senior Sales Engineer 61 Forsyth Street, S.W., Suite 23T85 Westinghouse Electric Company Atlanta, Georgia 30303 5929 Carnegie Blvd.

Suite 500 Virgil R. Autry, Director Charlotte, North Carolina 28209 Division of Radioactive Waste Management Bureau of Land and Waste Management Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201-1708 County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, South Carolina 29621