ML13331A484
| ML13331A484 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 08/31/1990 |
| From: | Ray H Southern California Edison Co |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13331A483 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9009060182 | |
| Download: ML13331A484 (3) | |
Text
BEFORE THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
)
COMPANY and SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
)
DOCKET NO. 50-206 for a Class 104(b) License to Acquire,
)
Possess, and Use a Utilization Facility as
)
Part of Unit No. 1 of the San Onofre Nuclear
)
Amendment Application Generating Station
)
No. 188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY and SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, hereby submit Amendment Application No. 188.
This amendment application consists of Proposed Change No. 151 to Provisional Operating License No. DPR-13.
Proposed Change No. 151 modifies the Technical Specifications incorporated in Provisional Operating License No. DPR-13 as Appendix A.
The proposed change will entirely replace the existing Section 3.3, "Safety Injection and Containment Spray System," with a new Section 3.3, "Emergency Core Cooling Systems." This proposed change incorporates new specifications for the operation of the recirculation system and provides new specifications for the operation of Emergency Core Cooling System components to reduce the need to apply Technical Specification 3.0.3.
Section 3.5, "Containment Isolation," is being revised to remove a conflict in the operability requirements for the safety injection sequencer. Section 4.2, "Safety Injection and Containment Spray System," is being revised to incorporate the additional surveillance requirements for the ECCS and inspection of the containment.
9009060182 900831 PDR ADOCK 05000206 P
FEDC
-2 In the event of conflict, the information in Amendment Application No. 188 supersedes the information previously submitted.
Based on the significant hazards analysis provided in the Description of Proposed Change and Significant Hazards Consideration Analysis of Proposed Change No. 151, it is concluded that (1) the proposed change does not involve a significant hazards consideration as defined in 10 CFR 50.92, and (2) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by the proposed change.
-3 Subscribed on the 31st day of August 1990.
Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY By:
Hafold B. Ray Senior Vice Presid nt Subscribed and sworn begfre me this
/L day of
(________
Notary Publfi in and for the State of California NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange HOLLY D. ROSET My Appointment Exp. 7-18-94 James A. Beoletto Attorney for Southern California Edison Company By:
Jabes A. Beol tto