ML13331A381
| ML13331A381 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 03/23/1990 |
| From: | Tatum J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Ray H Southern California Edison Co |
| References | |
| GL-89-001, TAC-75527 NUDOCS 9003290029 | |
| Download: ML13331A381 (4) | |
Text
r'arch 23, 1990 Docket No. 50-206 DISTRIBUTION Docket File NRC & LPORS PD5 Reading J. Bradfute J. Zwolinski T. Essig Mr. Harold B. Ray C. Trammell (2)
J. Calvo Vice President P. Shea E. Jordan Southern California Edison Company OGC-White Flint ACRS (10)
Irvine Operations Center PD5 Plant File J. Tatum (2) 23 Parker Irvine, California 92718
Dear Mr. Ray:
SUBJECT:
RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (GL 89-01) SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NO. 1 (TAC NO. 75527)
In reviewing your Amendment Application No. 175 dated December 12, 1989, we have determined that the additional information identified in the enclosure is needed to continue our review. Please provide us with your schedule for responding to this request.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under Pub. L.96-511.
Please contact us if you should have any questions regarding this request.
Sincerely, original signed by James E. Tatum James E. Tatum, Project Manager Project Directorate V Division of Reactor Projects -
- III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/enclosure:
See next page DRSP/P
(/PD5A "PID:PD5 PShe TEssig CTrammell:
3 /
/ 0
/W/903/
90
/-/0 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
[DOCUMENT NAME]
viR ofui RaoPjt0I IV, VandSecialrojec Offic of NclearReactr Reglatio
- pe REG&
0 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 March 23, 1990 Docket No. 50-206 Mr. Harold B. Ray Vice President Southern California Edison Company Irvine Operations Center 23 Parker Irvine, California 92718
Dear Mr. Ray:
SUBJECT:
RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (GL 89-01),SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NO. 1 (TAC NO. 75527)
In reviewing your Amendment Application No. 175 dated December 12, 1989, we have determined that the additional information identified in the enclosure is needed to continue our review. Please provide us with your schedule for responding to this request.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under Pub. L.96-511.
Please contact us if you should have any questions regarding this request.
Sincerely, mes E. Tatum, Project Manager Project Directorate V Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/enclosure:
See next page
Mr. Harold B. Ray San Onofre Nuclear Generating Southern California Edison Company Station, Unit No. 1 cc David R. Pigott Mr. Richard J. Kosiba, Project Manager Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe Bechtel Power Corporation 600 Montgomery Street 12440 E. Imperial Highway San Francisco, California 94111 Norwalk, California 90650 Mr. Robert G. Lacy Mr. Phil Johnson Manager, Nuclear U.S. Nuclear Regualtory Commission San Diego Gas & Electric Company Region V P. 0. Box 1831 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 San Diego, California 92112 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Resident Inspector/San Onofre NPS U.S. NRC P. 0. Box 4329 San Clemente, California 92672 Mayor City of San Clemente San Clemente, California 92672 Chairman Board of Supervisors County of San Diego 1600 Pacific Highway Room 335 San Diego, California 92101 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Mr. John Hickman Senior Health Physicist Environmental Radioactive Management Unit Environmental Management Branch State Department of Health Services 714 P Street, Room 616 Sacramento, California 95814 Mr. Don Womeldorf Chief Environmental Management California Department of Health 714 P Street, Room 616 Sacramento, California 95814
ENCLOSURE Request For Additional Information Re:
Amendment Application No. 175
- 1. By letter dated February 26, 1988, the licensee submitted Amendment Application No. 147. The current Amendment Application No. 175 super sedes the licensee's previous request to some extent, but the licensee has not addressed this matter in the current submittal. The licensee should supplement Amendment Application No. 175 to address this matter.
- 2. The licensee's submittal contains nonstandard verbage in the following proposed specifications:
- a. Sections 6.8.4.f (5), 6.13.2 and 6.14.2.
- b. Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, Section 6.9.1.6 (footnote).
The licensee should revise its amendment application to include the standard verbage suggested by Generic Letter 89-01 or explain why the verbage is not appropriate.
- 3. The licensee's current Technical Specification, Section 6.10.2, does not contain the following Standard Technical Specification requirement for record retention:
6.10.3.n Records of analyses required by the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program that would permit evaluation of the accuracy of the analysis at a later date. This should include procedures effective at specified times and QA records showing that these procedures were followed.
In so far as the guidance provided by Generic Letter 89-01 is based on Standard Technical Specification requirements, the licensee should revise its submittal to include this requirement or explain why this requirement is not appropriate.
- 4. In general, there are certain aspects of the licensee's existing Technical Specifications in the Administrative Controls Section that do not conform to Standard Technical Specification requirements.
For example, the licen see's Technical Specifications do not require the Nuclear Safety Group to conduct audits of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, and the Process Control Program. Such administrative controls are necessary before the changes suggested by Generic Letter 89-01 can be implemented. The licensee should revise its submittal to include those Standard Technical Specification requirements that are of this nature. Where the licensee does not believe a specific requirement is appropriate, an explanation should be provided.
- 5. As discussed with Mr. Llorens of the licensee's staff, the proposed ODCM which was submitted with Amendment Application No. 175 is not in a condition that would support issuance of the requested Technical Specifi cation amendment. The licensee should provide a copy of the proposed ODCM which has been revised accordingly with its next submittal.