|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML23173A1522023-06-22022 June 2023 Request for Additional Information NextEra Fleet Emergency Plan Amendment Request ML23156A3042023-05-31031 May 2023 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Remove Period of Applicability from Pressure Temperature Limits and Low Temperature Over Pressure Protection Curves ML23109A1862023-04-19019 April 2023 and Turkey Point Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Proposed Alternative to Asme Section XI Authorizing Implementation of Asme Code Case N-752-1 ML23066A1892023-03-0303 March 2023 OEDO-22-00419: Email Dated 3-3-2023 to Petitioner on Seabrook ASR Petition ML23066A0892023-02-24024 February 2023 OEDO-22-00419 - Email Dated 02/24/2023 to Petitioner on Seabrook Unit 1 ASR Petition ML23020A9392023-01-19019 January 2023 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise Cooling Tower Service Water Loop or Cell Requirements (EPID L-2022-LLA-0183) (Email) ML23011A3082023-01-11011 January 2023 Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request 4RA-22-001 (L-2022-LLR-0074) ML22341A0012022-12-0606 December 2022 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Request 4RA-22-001, Proposed Alternative in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2) ML22333A7452022-11-22022 November 2022 OEDO-22-00419 - Email: C-10 Response on PRB Initial Assessment - C-10 Petition on Seabrook ASR Concrete Degradation ML22287A1472022-10-13013 October 2022 2.026 Petition Screen-in Email ML22228A0552022-08-15015 August 2022 Request for Additional Information Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report Review ML22200A1082022-07-19019 July 2022 Acceptance Review for TSTF-577 Amendment ML22153A4152022-05-31031 May 2022 Request for Additional Information Re 120V Inverter LAR from TS Branch - Final ML22116A2442022-04-26026 April 2022 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Request 3IR-18 and 3IR-19 for End of Third 10-Year ISI Interval for Examinations with Limited Coverage ML22048B5522022-02-17017 February 2022 LTR-22-0010 Reply to Geoff Gilbert Email Concern About Seabrook Station Concrete Degradation ML22062B6642022-02-0707 February 2022 Request for Additional Information 120V Inverter LAR from the Electrical Branch ML22063A0002022-01-25025 January 2022 Requests for Additional Information from Risk Branch Regarding 120V Inverter LAR ML22020A2542022-01-20020 January 2022 LTR-22-0010 Geoff Gilbert, E-mail Concern About Seabrook Station Concrete Degradation ML21097A2512021-04-0707 April 2021 Request for Additional Information Regarding Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report Review for RFO 20 (EPID L-2020-LRO-0066) (Email) ML21054A0482021-02-23023 February 2021 Request for Additional Information Regarding Heat Flux Hot Channel Requirement Amendment Request ML20343A0942020-12-0303 December 2020 Request for Additional Information Regarding Seabrook (COVID-19) Part 73 Force-on-Force Exemption Request (L-2020-LLE-0219) ML20273A2812020-09-22022 September 2020 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action License Amendment Request to Resolve Non-Conservative Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor Requiments ML20258A1502020-09-14014 September 2020 Request for Additional Information Related to Seabrook License Amendment Request Regarding One-Time Change to the AC Sources Operating TS ML20260H4932020-09-11011 September 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Comanche Peak - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action - Request to Use Later Code Edition of ASME OM Code ML20230A2962020-08-14014 August 2020 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action License Amendment Request to Allow a One-Time Change to the AC Sources Operating TS ML20167A1842020-06-11011 June 2020 Request for Additional Information Related to Seabrook License Amendment Request Regarding TSTF-411 and TSTF-418 (L-2019-LLA-0237) ML20124A0012020-05-0101 May 2020 Cancellation of Call with Seabrook on Steam Generator Tube Inspections ML20114E1592020-04-23023 April 2020 Email and Request for Additional Information Related to Seabrook License Amendment Request to Degraded Voltage Time Delay Setpoint (L-2020-LLA-0012) ML20101N0932020-04-10010 April 2020 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re Relief Request to Defer ASME Inspections Due COVID-19 (EPIDs L-2020-LLR-0055, -56, and -57) ML20101L0402020-04-10010 April 2020 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Request to Use Code Case OMN-13 with 2012 Edition of the OM Code ML20101H3912020-04-0808 April 2020 Verbal Authorization for Seabrook Relief Request 3IIR-7 ML20087K8262020-03-27027 March 2020 Upcoming Steam Generator Tube Inservice Inspection ML20063J9792020-02-28028 February 2020 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise Degraded Voltage Time Delay Setpoint ML19347C6732019-12-13013 December 2019 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-418 ML19296D9122019-10-23023 October 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information Related to Seabrook Inverter Amendment (L-2019-LLA-0216) ML19295F5422019-10-15015 October 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise Onsite Power Distribution Requirements ML19275G7832019-10-0101 October 2019 Limited Appearance Statement from New Hampshire State Representative, Robert Harb Regarding the Seabrook Station Unit 1 License Amendment Application ML19270E6512019-09-27027 September 2019 Limited Appearance Statement from Joanna Hammond Regarding the Seabrook Station Unit 1 License Amendment Application ML19270E6542019-09-26026 September 2019 Limited Appearance Statement from Brian Campbell Regarding the Seabrook Station Unit 1 License Amendment Application ML19196A3592019-07-15015 July 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise the Emergency Core Cooling System Accumulator Technical Specifications ML19169A2412019-06-13013 June 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Requests for the Containment Building Spray Pump Flow and Vibration Testing (Epids L-2019-LLR-00 and L-2019-LLR-00) ML19162A0662019-06-0404 June 2019 Reply to Mr. Rick Jakious'S E-mail of 5-29-2019 to Stephen B. Comley Sr., We the People with Attachments ML19112A1782019-04-22022 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Point Beach; Seabrook; Turkey Point - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-563 ML19101A4042019-04-11011 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Point Beach; Seabrook; St. Lucie; Turkey Point - Acceptance of Licensing Action Relief Request to Use Encoded Phased Array Ultrasonic Examination Techniques for Ferritic and Austenitic Welds ML19070A2382019-03-10010 March 2019 LTR-19-0088 Maura Healey, Attorney General, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Ltr NextEras Requests for a License Amendment and Twenty-year Extension Prior to Issuance of a Final Decision in Adjudicatory Hearing on Concrete Degradation at ML19056A4522019-02-25025 February 2019 Comment from Philip Hurzeler Regarding the Emergency Petition Filed by C-10 on February 13, 2019 ML19056A4582019-02-25025 February 2019 Comment from Deborah A. Jones Regarding the Emergency Petition Filed by C-10 on February 13, 2019 ML19056A4602019-02-25025 February 2019 Comment from Lisa Conti Regarding the Emergency Petition Filed by C-10 on February 13, 2019 ML19050A2212019-02-19019 February 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Request Proposed Alternative 3IR-17 Implementation of an Extended Reactor Vessel Inservice Inspection Interval ML19050A3202019-02-13013 February 2019 Package from Stephen B. Comley, Sr. at February 13, 2019 Seabrook Station, Unit 1, Public Meeting 2023-06-22
[Table view] |
Text
1 Lee, Erika From: Ossing, Michael <Michael.Ossing@nexteraenergy.com>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 11:35 PM To: Lamb, John Cc:Connolly, James
Subject:
Seabrook Station Response to NRC Draft RA Is on the Seabrook Station Relief Request RA-13-001 Attachments:
C-S-1-45893-CALC_000_4.pdfJohn Below are the Seabrook Station responses to the Draft RAI questions discussed at 2200 on August 30, 2013.
- 1. The licensee submitted the proposed relief request pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i). The NRC staff finds this is not appropriate because 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i) is for the alternative that provides equivalent level of quality and safety as the ASME Code requirement. The NRC does not believe the proposed repair could achieve the equivalent quality and safety. The NRC staff finds that the relief request should be submitted under 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii).
Response: Seabrook concurs that the appropriate basis for this relief request is 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii). Change Section 5 header to "hardship".
2 (a) Provide the pressure rating of the weldolet and blind flange. (b) Provide the design and normal operation pressure and temperature.
Response:
(a) The pressure rating of the weldolet and blind flange is 150 psi and 200 degrees F. (b) Design - 150 psi and 200 degrees F. Normal operating pressure is 75 psi and Normal operating temperature is 65 degrees F maximum and 35 degrees F minimum.
- 3. (a) Discuss whether the weldolet is an ASME Code component (satisfies the ASME Code). (b) Discuss whether the welding of the weldolet on the degraded pipe satisfies the ASME Code,Section III or Construction Code.
Response a) The weldolet is ASME SA material and meets the ASME Section III ND requirement for branch connections.
b) The welding will be performed using a qualified procedure that meets the ASME Section IX requirements for an open root, full penetration weld. The branch connection will meet the ASME Section III ND requirements for fabrication.
- 4. (a) Discuss the pre-installation and post-installation (pre-service) nondestructive examinations (NDE) for the weldolet. (b) Discuss the acceptance criteria for the welding of the weldolet (c) Discuss whether the NDE method is based on the ASME Code,Section XI.
Response:
a) The pre-installation NDE requirements for the weldolet consists of the verification of ASME material, the verification of proper weld joint fit-up and a final Visual and Magnetic Particle exam of the final weld. The post installation NDE requirements consist of a VT-2 for leakage in accordance Section XI, IWA-5000.
b) The acceptance criteria are in accordance with the original construction code, ASME Section III ND, requirements.
2c) The NDE examination methods performed will meet the ASME Section XI, IWA-4500 requirements.
- 5. Provide Reference 2-- Seabrook Station Calculation C-S-1-45893-CALC Rev. 000 "Code Case N-513-3 Pipe Wall Flaw Evaluation for: SW-1802-004-153-24"
Response: Calculation C-S-1-45893 Rev 000 is attached.
- 6. (a) Provide calculations to demonstrate that the pipe wall thickness underneath the weldolet and associated weldment will not be reduced by the corrosion during the effective duration of the relief request. (b) Discuss the minimum pipe wall thickness underneath the weldolet and its weldment that is required to maintain the structural integrity of the repair. (c) Discuss what is the wall thickness of the pipe that the weldolet will be weld on.
Response: The sizing of the weldolet (6 inch nominal) was based upon the identified wall thickness of the piping and it's installation position with respect to the bounded flaw size (2.327 by 1.5 inch). The weldolet will be welded to pipe wall thickness verified to be of a thickness of 0.375 inch or better. The typical corrosion rate used by Seabrook is 30 mils per year. To address the unknown corrosion rate within the bounded area, a factor of 4 is applied resulting in a rate of 120 mils per year. Although the installation duration is less than a year (next refueling outage is April 2014) 120 m ils is used. The resulting pipe wall under the weldolet and weldment will therefore be reduced from to 0.375 - 0.120 = 0.255 inch. The ASME Section III Code requirement for minimum pipe wall is 0.105 inch, calculated in calculation C-S-1-45893. As the pipe wall with future metal loss, calculated to be 0.255inch, exceeds the Code minimum of 0.105 inch, structural integrity of the repair will be maintained. The 6.6875 inside diameter of the weldolet in relationship with the major axis dimension of the bounded flaw (2.327) provides sufficient metal such that further corrosion will not affect the integrity of the repair.
- 7. Describe the pipe supports (hangers or lateral restraints?) that are located to the defective area. How far these pipe supports are from the defect area?
Response: The weight of the repair components is determined as follows: 14.20 lbs (weldolet) + 27 lbs (weld neck flange with bolting) + 26 lbs (blind flange) + 10 lbs (water content) = 77.2 lbs. The pipe supports adjacent to the defective area are:
1802-SG Vertical support (+) approx imately three feet downstream of th e defect area (providing strainer anchorage) 1802-RG Lateral support (+) approximately 1.5 feet downstream of the defect area on the strainer bypass piping 1802-SG Vertical support (+) appr oximately 9.0 feet downstream of the defect area on the strainer bypass piping. 1802-SG Vertical and lateral support (+) approximately 19 feet upstream of the defect area. A review of the pipe support design documentation has concluded that the existing pipe support scheme canaccommodate the weight addition of 77.2 lbs.
Additionally, Seabrook understands the following:
- 1. Seabrook will not install the blind flange prior to NRC verbal authorization. 2. Seabrook will remove IWA 4340 references in the relief request.
Michael Ossing Licensing Manager 3Seabrook Station 603-773-7512