LER-2013-004, Safety Injection Flow Path Not Isolated Due to Manual Valve Out of Position |
| Event date: |
|
|---|
| Report date: |
|
|---|
| Reporting criterion: |
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function |
|---|
| 2502013004R00 - NRC Website |
|
text
0FPL.
L-2013-149 10 CFR § 50.73 April 29, 2013 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 Re:
Turkey Point Unit 3 Docket No. 50-250 Reportable Event: 2013-004-00 Safety Injection Flow Path Not Isolated Due to Manual Valve Out of Position The attached Licensee Event Report 05000250/2013-004-00 is submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) as a condition prohibited by the Technical Specifications.
If there are any questions, please call Mr. Robert J. Tomonto at 305-246-7327.
Very truly yours, Michael Kiley Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Attachment cc:
Regional Administrator, USNRC, Region II Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power & Light Company 9760 SW 3 4 4th St., Florida City, FL 33035 ZvV*9
NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 10/31/2013
- 10-2010)
, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.
- 3. PAGE Turkey Point Unit 3 05000250 1 of4
- 4. TITLE Safety Injection Flow Path Not Isolated Due to Manual Valve Out of Position
- 5. EVENT DATE
- 6. LER NUMBER
- 7. REPORT DATE
- 8. OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENTIAL REV MONTH DAY YEAR NUMBER RNEO.
FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 2
27 2013 2013-004 00 4
29 2013
- 9. OPERATING MODE
- 11. THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR§: (Check all that apply)
El 20.2201(b)
Dl 20.2203(a)(3)(i)
Dl 50.73(a)(2)(i)(C)
El 50.73(a)(2)(vii)
Mode 5 El 20.2201(d)
[] 20.2203(a)(3)(ii)
El 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A)
El 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)
El 20.2203(a)(1)
El 20.2203(a)(4)
El 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B)
El 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)
[I 20.2203(a)(2)(i)
[] 50.36(c)(1)(i)(A)
El 50.73(a)(2)(iii)
El 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)
- 10. POWER LEVEL 0l 20.2203(a)(2)(ii)
E] 50.36(c)(l)(ii)(A)
El 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A) 0l 50.73(a)(2)(x)
"l 20.2203(a)(2)(iii)
El 50.36(c)(2) 0l 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A)
El 73.71(a)(4)
El 20.2203(a)(2)(iv)
[I 50.46(a)(3)(ii)0 El 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B)
El 73.71(a)(5) 0 E 20.2203(a)(2)(v)
El 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A) 0l 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C)
El OTHER 0l 20.2203(a)(2)(vi) 0 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B)
El 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D)
Specify in Abstract below or in
- 2. Work planning did not provide for adequate verification of critical installation steps.
ANALYSIS OF THE EVENT
A modification package for the hot leg injection flow path provided the design, basis, installation instructions and functional testing requirements for the installation of valve 3-990, with a manual operator and reach rod.
The reach rod has seven universal joints, one splined joint, one shielded floor penetration assembly, a male drive operating station, wall terminal operating station and a 900 gear box for a total of seventeen connection points which are either pinned or keyed. Each universal joint can be connected to the adjacent components by means of a Woodruff Key or an "S" hole for insertion of a roll pin. If the roll pin option is used vendor documents identify that the "S" hole is to be located, drilled and mated at assembly by the customer in the field. No record, or a requirement for a record, was found indicating pin or key connection points on the reach rod assembly were tracked for completion by the work crew, crew supervisor or installation engineer. The installation of the reach rod was completed on July 5, 2012. The turnover walk down phase of the design process was completed on July 12, 2012.
On July 24, 2012 a post-modification test was performed by cycling valve 3-990 open and closed using the reach rod. The test was recorded as satisfactory. Following completion of testing valve 3-990 remained in the closed and locked position until February 25, 2013.
On February 23, 2013 work began to modify the male driver tab lock on the valve 3-990 reach rod and lubricate reach rod operators. This work and a post maintenance test (PMT) were completed on February 25, 2013 at approximately 1543. For the PMT, an operator cycled the valve open using the remote valve operator on the Auxiliary Building roof while a second operator stationed locally in the pipe and valve room observed valve motion. After the valve was opened, the operator stationed locally commenced closing the valve. The operator at the remote station observed the remote hand wheel rotating. At this point, the operator on the Auxiliary Building roof using the remote hand wheel assumed control and continued closing valve 3-990. The operator in the pipe and valve room relocated to the remote station. With valve 3-990 indicating closed at the remote hand wheel station the operators reported satisfactory completion of the PMT. The valve was not verified closed locally.
On February 27, 2013 at approximately 1750, as previously discussed, power was restored to RCS hot leg injection valve MOV-3-866A in preparation for IST. Compliance with TS LCO 3.4.9.3 was not met, because valve 3-990 was not closed.
On February 28, 2013 at approximately 0230, MOV-3-866A and MOV-3-866B were verified closed and de-energized with their breakers locked in the off position, restoring compliance with TS LCO 3.4.9.3.
When the incorrect valve position was investigated, it was discovered that two universal joints in the reach rod system still had their temporary assembly set screws installed and one of those had failed. Temporary set screws are used to facilitate assembly and set up, but then the set screws are to be replaced with more robust roll pins. As a result, the reach rod was not engaged to the remote operator and could be rotated without
affecting the local hand wheel. The local hand wheel was used to close valve 3-990. Both universal joint connections were repaired by installing the missing roll pins.
ANALYSIS OF SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE While TS LCO 3.4.9.3 was not met when power was restored to MOV-3-866A at approximately 1750 on February 27, 2013, the RCS hot leg injection flow path was effectively isolated except for the brief periods during which MOV-3-866A and MOV-3-866B were stroked at approximately 0048 and 0100, respectively, on February 28, 2013. Upon recognition that flow path isolation had not been maintained as required, TS 3.4.9.3 Action a, was entered. At approximately 0230 on February 28, 2013, MOV-3-866A and MOV 866B were verified closed and de-energized with their breakers locked in the off position and TS LCO 3.4.9.3, Action a, was exited.
The hot leg injection flow path did not meet TS requirements for approximately 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> and 40 minutes which exceeded the allowed time of 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />. The probability for a low temperature overpressure event occurring during this time is judged to be low. Parallel RCS hot leg injection valves MOV-3-866A and MOV-3-866B are normally closed, do not receive a safety injection initiation signal, and are manually opened in accordance with procedures during the later phases of a loss of coolant accident. As a result, the safety significance of this event is very low.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
Corrective actions are documented in AR 1852222 and include the following:
- 1. The similar valve in Unit 4, 4-990, was verified locally to be closed.
- 2. The reach rod assemblies for the three other recently installed valves with reach rod systems will be inspected to ensure all roll pins are installed.
- 3. Revise the Operations Department Instruction for valve manipulation and the Conduct of Operations procedure to provide guidelines to verify reach rod operation. Guidance will include stationing operators at both remote operator and local valve communicating with each other, to monitor reach rod operation during the entire valve travel cycle.
- 4. Establish a means to better control work in the field that ensures critical installation steps are verified complete.
FAILED COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED: None
PREVIOUS SIMILAR EVENTS
None
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000251/LER-2013-001, Regarding Power Operated Relief Valve Inoperable for Greater than Allowed Outage Time Due to Lifted Leads | Regarding Power Operated Relief Valve Inoperable for Greater than Allowed Outage Time Due to Lifted Leads | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000250/LER-2013-001, Regarding Procedure Noncompliance Causes Incorrect Instrument Setting and Condition Prohibited by Technical Specifications | Regarding Procedure Noncompliance Causes Incorrect Instrument Setting and Condition Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000251/LER-2013-002, Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Offsite Power Resulting from Generator Testing | Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Offsite Power Resulting from Generator Testing | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000250/LER-2013-002, Regarding Automatic Reactor Trip Due to Low Condenser Vacuum | Regarding Automatic Reactor Trip Due to Low Condenser Vacuum | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000250/LER-2013-003, Regarding Manual Reactor Trip Due to Increasing Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Leakage | Regarding Manual Reactor Trip Due to Increasing Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Leakage | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000250/LER-2013-004, Safety Injection Flow Path Not Isolated Due to Manual Valve Out of Position | Safety Injection Flow Path Not Isolated Due to Manual Valve Out of Position | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000250/LER-2013-005, Reactor Trip Due to Turbine Header Pressure Spike While Testing Turbine Control Valves | Reactor Trip Due to Turbine Header Pressure Spike While Testing Turbine Control Valves | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000250/LER-2013-006, Regarding Reactor Protection and Auxiliary Feed Water System Actuations Due to Trip of Operating Feed Water Pumps | Regarding Reactor Protection and Auxiliary Feed Water System Actuations Due to Trip of Operating Feed Water Pumps | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000250/LER-2013-007, Regarding Manual Reactor Trip Due to Generator Load Drop | Regarding Manual Reactor Trip Due to Generator Load Drop | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000250/LER-2013-008, Regarding Through-Wall Leak in 3A CCW Pump Threaded Fitting Caused Pump to Be Inoperable Longer than AOT | Regarding Through-Wall Leak in 3A CCW Pump Threaded Fitting Caused Pump to Be Inoperable Longer than AOT | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000250/LER-2013-009, Regarding Loose Breaker Control Power Fuse Holder Caused 3B Jcw Pump to Be Inoperable Longer than AOT | Regarding Loose Breaker Control Power Fuse Holder Caused 3B Jcw Pump to Be Inoperable Longer than AOT | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) |
|