ML13004A322
| ML13004A322 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 03/08/2011 |
| From: | Rosenberg S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Lawrence Criscione NRC/RES/DRA |
| Shared Package | |
| ML130040225 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2012-0259 | |
| Download: ML13004A322 (6) | |
Text
Criscione, Lawrence From:
Rosenberg, Stacey Sent:
Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:56 PM To:
Criscione, Lawrence Cc:
Beaulieu, David
Subject:
RE: Non-Concurrence of Draft IN for Reactivity Management Hi Larry, The non-concurrence and the staff's response is now publicly available in ADAMS in response to your request on the non-concurrence form.
Draft MD 10.158, Section "Organizational responsibilities," paragraph (d) states, "Prior to making non-concurrence records publicly available, assure that records are screened in accordance with all requirements related to the public release of agency records."
This issue required coordination and review by several NRC offices, and we prioritized it in accordance with a number of other high priority generic communication tasks.
We appreciate your patience in this matter. If you have any other questions, please feel free to contact me.
- Thanks, Stacey From: Criscione, Lawrence Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 5:37 PM To: Rosenberg, Stacey; Beaulieu, David
Subject:
RE: Non-Concurrence of Draft IN for Reactivity Management Thanks Stacey.
I submitted a FOIA request yesterday and received an acknowledgement letter today (FOIA 2011-00096). I would prefer to have the document released publically via ADAMS, but I wanted you to be aware of the FOIA request, I am able to view and print the document from internal ADAMS, but I do not believe I am allowed to share it since it has not been publically released. There are a few politicians and interveners who have been assisting me in addressing my concerns regarding Callaway, so I need a copy of the Non-Concurrence Form which I can share with people outside the NRC.
From: Rosenberg, Stacey Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 5:29 PM To: Criscione, Lawrence; Beaulieu, David
Subject:
RE: Non-Concurrence of Draft IN for Reactivity Management Hi Larry, That decision is pending. We are aware of your request (as per the form) to make the non-concurrencetresponse publicly available, and we are working with the appropriate staff and OGC to make that determination. I will let you know as soon as we have a decision. I hope to get back to you with a decision within a few weeks.
- Thanks, I
Stacey From: Criscione, Lawrence Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 4:49 PM To: Beaulieu, David; Rosenberg, Stacey
Subject:
RE: Non-Concurrence of Draft IN for Reactivity Management Dave/Stacey, Do you intend to make ML110420293, Non-Concurrence on NRC Information Notice 2011-02, publically available in ADAMS?
Larry From: Beaulieu, David Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 12:37 PM To: Criscione, Lawrence; Rosenberg, Stacey
Subject:
RE: Non-Concurrence of Draft IN for Reactivity Management
- Larry, The non-concurrence is complete. The ADAMS accession number is ML110420293. Lauren said that this afternoon she will create an ADAMS package that will have the IN and the non-concurrence. She will then have the document declared an official record.
From: Cnscione, Lawrence Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 12:21 PM To: Crisdone, Lawrence; Rosenberg, Stacey Cc: Beaulieu, David
Subject:
RE: Non-Concurrence of Draft IN for Reactivity Management
- Stacey, What's the status of the Non-Concurrence? Has it been closed? Are you waiting on me for anything? Do you know why it is not yet in ADAMS?
- Thanks, L arry..
From: Criscione, Lawrence Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 6:54 PM To: Rosenberg, Stacey Cc: Beaulieu, David
Subject:
RE: Non-Concurrence of Draft IN for Reactivity Management
- Stacy,
[Email is included elsewhere]
2
V Criscione, Lawrence From:
Criscione, Lawrence Sent:
Wednesday, February 02, 2011 6:54 PM To:
Rosenberg, Stacey Cc:
Beaulieu, David
Subject:
RE: Non-Concurrence of Draft IN for Reactivity Management Attachments:
DraftNon-ConcurrencePolicy_pagel 0.pdf
- Stacy, I met with Dave today and reviewed Section C of Form 757.
The procedure only says I need to be "informed" by the sponsor so you are not required to meet with me. My input to Dave was that I would like the following blocks checked at the bottom of Section C:
NON-CONCURS WANTS NCP FORM PUBLIC If you would like to meet with me tomorrow to debrief the process, I am more than willing to come down to One White Flint. Otherwise, I'm satisfied with the discussion I had today with Dave (assuming the NCP form will be a public record).
Thanks for all your work on this, Larrry From: Rosenberg, Stacey Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 11:49 AM To: Criscione, Lawrence
Subject:
RE: Non-Concurrence of Draft IN for Reactivity Management
- Larry, Dave is going to send you a copy of Section C (it is not in ADAMS yet) and then we can schedule a meeting. I am working from home today. I plan to be in the office tomorrow so possibly tomorrow, or if not, then Monday afternoon.
- Thanks, Stacey From: Criscione, Lawrence Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 9:09 AM To: Rosenberg, Stacey Cc: Beaulieu, David
Subject:
FW: Non-Concurrence of Draft IN for Reactivity Management
- Stacey, Please see the attached page from the Draft Non-Concurrence Policy. I've highlighted where I believe we are at in the policy.
Regardless of where we are at in the process, I am available to meet with you and Dave to discuss Section C of Form 757 any time that you would like. It will be a more productive (i.e. shorter) meeting if I can see the response in Section C ahead of time (and a meeting might not be required based on the response).
I am taking off work this Friday and the following Monday morning. My Outlook calendar is up to date regarding my time off and my workday meetings/commitments. I can come down to OWF any time, but I often attend the 1:30 OpE Clearinghouse meeting so any time before or after that meeting works best for me. The meeting typically ends between 1400 and 1430 based on the number of incidents being screened.
- Thanks, Larry From: Rosenberg, Stacey Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 1:19 PM To: Criscione, Lawrence
Subject:
RE: Non-Concurrence of Draft IN for Reactivity Management That's interesting. Let me do some digging and get back to you.
I...
From: Criscione, Lawrence Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 12:42 PM To: Rosenberg, Stacey
Subject:
RE: Non-Concurrence of Draft IN for Reactivity Management
- Stacey, When I call up ML101810282 in ADAMS, all I find is the five page Information Notice (with the duplicate 5th page showing the routing). Where is the form 757 located?
- Thanks, 1.a r rY...
From: Rosenberg, Stacey Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 10:21 AM To: Criscione, Lawrence Cc: Beaulieu, David
Subject:
RE: Non-Concurrence of Draft IN for Reactivity Management Hi Larry, The IN on reactivity management was issued yesterday. It can be found in ADAMS at ML101810282. The package includes your non-concurrence form as well as the agency response.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact either me or Dave.
- Best, Stacey From: Criscione, Lawrence Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 3:23 PM To: Rosenberg, Stacey; Beaulieu, David
Subject:
FW: Non-Concurrence of Draft IN for Reactivity Management Stacey/Dave:
Please update me on the status of the draft IN on reactivity management. What still needs to happen for us to issue this IN? Who is addressing the items in my Non-Concurrence form? Is there anything I can do to assist?
- Thanks, Larry
From: Criscione, Lawrence Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 4:17 PM To: Rosenberg, Stacey Cc: Beaulieu, David Subjec: FW: Non-Concurrence of Draft IN for Reactivity Management
- Stacey, Attached is my Form 757 (Non-Concurrence) for the draft IN on "Operator Performance Issues Involving Reactivity Management at Nuclear Power Plants."
In Section A of the form I ask two questions. I realize you probably are not the one to answer those questions, but I would appreciate it if you get an answer to those questions from Region IV or the appropriate office at headquarters.
I will be leaving for Illinois at 9 am tomorrow and will not return until Janur lease do not hesitate to call me over the holidays if you have any questions for me. My phone number is=b(
!Jl should be checking my NRC email account daily, but since I am unable to rprpiyiv attachmpnte via wphm.il, if you send me any documents needing review, please copy my personal email account! (b)(6)I I appreciate all the work that you and Dave have put into the Information Notice.
V/r, Larry From: Criscione, Lawrence Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 6:51 AM To: Beasley, Benjamin
Subject:
Non-Concurrence of Draft IN for Reactivity Management
- Ben,
[This email is included elsewhere]
DRAFT HANDBOOK 10.158 10