ML12348A184
| ML12348A184 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs |
| Issue date: | 10/16/2012 |
| From: | Moore R Constellation Energy Nuclear Group |
| To: | D'Antonio J Operations Branch I |
| Jackson D | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML12067A049 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC U01849 | |
| Download: ML12348A184 (25) | |
Text
~~9-supJ -final-fows-ills doc Form ES-201-1 Facility: Calvert Cliffs Date of Examination:
Developed by: Written - Facility X NRCD II Operating - Facility X NRCD Target Chief Date*
Task Description (Reference)
Examiner's Initials
-180
- 1.
Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b)
..~
-120
- 2.
NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)
~
-120
- 3.
Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)
~
-120
- 4.
Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)
~
[-90]
[5.
Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)]
~
{-75}
- 6.
Integrated examination outline(s) due, including FomlS ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)
/f
{-70}
{7.
Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility
/
licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}
(f
{-45}
- 8.
Proposed examinations (including written, walk-thmugh JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form /)
ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)
-30
- 9.
Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)
- J
-14
- 10.
Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES-202)
.~
-14
- 11.
Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) iJ
-14
- 12.
Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j!; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)
It-
-7
- 13.
Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h) 17
-7
- 14.
Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (Lr (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)
-7
- 15.
Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed rr with facility licensee (C.3.k)
-7
- 16.
Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions
(/
distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)
- Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Date of Examination: August 2, 2010 Initials Item Task Description a
b*
c#
L
- a.
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.
W lJL k \\f1; R
- b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.I of ES-40 1 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
4JL I
a
- ~
I c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
1£ T
T
('
!'-..J -z E
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
N 1Jt r ~
- 2.
- a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number ofnormal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, it(, d' S
and major transients,
~
I
- b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number M
and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation U
schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested L
using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated ilL d,rt from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
A
- c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) confbrm(s) with the qualitative o
and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
R T
Ui... d n,
- a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(I) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number ofcontrol room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form
- 3.
(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form W
(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit testes)
A (4) the number ofnew or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form L
(5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria K
on the form.
T
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the ta~ks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form R
(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified
~
H J ~%
U (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
- c.
Determine ifthere are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
~
~.
<t
\\
- 4.
in the appropriate exam sections.
"ti..
tl ~
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
fir G
~
lS--P N
E C.
Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
"lJL (
~~
E
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
1<Ji....
v v-;;
R lJL t
-.s-y;..
- e. Check the entire exam for balance ofcoverage.
A
L
~ tV
-.s":l v
/
F Date
~nted Name/S!gn~, --P r
- a. Author Domenlc F, Lavalo
~ ~~""T ~~
5l2CJ i12...
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
Richard C. Jones
~./'\\
I s.. 2q-rZ c, NRC Chief Examiner (#)
{; III /rL d, NRC Supervisor 6/-1'1 ~L L/
Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c": chief examiner concurrence required.
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines
1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway Lusby, Maryland 20657 CENG
(::ALVERT CUFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT To:
Joe D'Antonio, NRC Region 1 Chief Examiner From: Nick Lavato, Principal Operations Training Specialist Subj: 2012 Initial Licensed Operator Exam Material Date: May 29, 2012 Please find enclosed materials supporting administration of the 2012 Initial Licensed Operator Exam at Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant.
The following documents are enclosed as per our telephone conversation and as specified on Form ES-201-1:
- 1. Form ES-201-2, Examination Outline Quality Checklist
- 2. Form ES-201-3, Examination Security Agreement (Copy of)
- 5. Form ES-301-1, Administrative Topics Outline (SROU)
- 7. Form ES-D-1, Scenario Outline (Scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4)
- 10. Form ES-401-4, Record of Rejected K/As
- 11. JPM Description Document The PWR Examination Outline for RO and SRO Exams and the Generic Knowledge and Abilities Outline for RO and SRO Exams were developed using NKEG (NRC KA Exam Generator) software developed by Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC.
The Enclosed materials must be withheld from public disclosure until after the examinations are complete. Administration of the exam will take place beginning August 13th, 2012 and conclude on or about August 22nd, 2012.
Principal Operations Training Specialist ~~ S/2!I/1Z Signature Date
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knorij~ not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE DATE NOTE
?~~1t..~
I~I~'
~~~;oo=.._fi--~
- 4.
~~~rt'Jl-. -
).. -=="-!!!!6oI=i~-~'
-=::..;.:~-=--
- 5.
~.d!&1lAaC1...
'I
~
- 6.
JrA}Lt2:;;;;;;:1i;c
~ r~~ ~
- 7.
~
I"!D~¢.. <3., "t'
~.
'Bm3DZ=~
~=0!
b/y#'2---Ai//~
10.,
_~Rf. ~,
)~
t:{f!.lIl.,~L 12:xJ;l
_...-r
- 11.
j~~;tt'*\\,~b
~ {*~
NOTES:
~ 6=.
(D V.£V1'-d<.tCW\\ J ~A.,v..~ h.t)..1 ~& ~ 0\\ NU ~
~
1}L ~~ o..,~ Rf)~ i1~ 't-fo.. U(2 c@l tf.~~~,
Page 86 L
APPENDIX 1.1 NRC ~xam Security Agreement - Developers, Reviewers, Approvers, and Evaluators j~ ;,
DI "
to,2
- 1. Pre-Examination
~ ~
~II'/
I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC r~~on examinations scheduled for the week(s) otps ofthe date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those operators scheduled to be administered these examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation ofthe conditions ofthis agreement may result in cancellation ofthe examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or oo""finn" that examination security may have been
- 2. Post-Examination h '~'JLlII Jk To the best of my knowledge, I did not 'vulg to y unaut rized persons any information concerning the NRC~ tisR ~nations administered during the week(s) of ~D (-z-" From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, 1 did not in truct, eval ate, or provide performance feedback to those operators who were administered these examinations, except as specit1cally noted below and authorized by the NRC I es04' ii4i I £'It,,.i ~
-I
--=1 IF YOU SIGN ON TO THIS EXAM SECURITY AGREEMENT YOU MUST WEAR A BADGE o p~ fduM. C:rD(::~ol~~Df::2xAMSE~RI~~R;:;W~~
~ (l-£A. ~1h- ~6.LJbvf.
'i-~-I'L@ o~?
J 1-.
Cl 0'00
~
C'J
=
o =
<D =
=
=
<I:
I CJ.)
Cl
~
~
Cl l..C'I (Y"'o C'J C'J
=
C'J
~
=
<1.>
CJ.)
Page 86 APPENDIX 1.1 NRC Requal Exam Security Agreement...,. DevelopeTS, Reviewers, Approvers, and Evaluators
- 1. Pre-Examination l acknowledge that) have acquired specialized k:nowledge about the NRC requalification examinations scheduled far the week(s) of as ofthe date of my srgnatwra. 1 agree thnJ f will not knowingly divulge any infor.mation aboullhese examinations to allY persons who have not been authorized by ttJe NRC's chiefexamiller. ) understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those operators schedul¢d to he administered Lhese exruninalioTlS from this date untiJ completion ofe.xaminalion administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator i~ acceptable if the indivLdual does notseJed.lhe trBtning eontent or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthennore, 1 am aware ofthe physical security measures and requirements (as documented in tile facUlty licensee's prwedures) and understand that vlo!alion ofthe conditjons ofthis agreement may result [n cancellation of the ex.aminations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I wnl immediafely report to facility management <u the NRC's chiefexaminer any indlcations or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised,
- 2. Post-Examio II Hon To the best of my knowledge, J did not ivuJg to
,y u uthorized pe.rsons any information ooncemrng the NRC requaHlication examinations administered d\\1ring Ihe week{s)of r
, From the date that renlered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, 1 did not instruct, eva[uatc, r provjde pelformance feedback to those operators who were administeTcd these examination~ except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC JOp TJTtl;!
P~TEDNAmE StGNATURE-(l)
DATE SIGNATU8£ (2)-
DATE NO-T-E
- RESPOMi lBrLl'rY
, J~~...J a_,,~
c.to OJe~
A..
1'*II..JI
- 2.
~~... c.......t-.
tA.D l~~
__~l--_
. ~
~
.-~
~
- 3.
(..,f!<J
~
f ~'" '--c>o..J T
~p..'-1. lJ. - ~ ~
sr:.?o
~~~'/'
t~~~~~ IK~.w.~
- s. I),I1U.14M. ~... 'IlArt'Ar'Ii
'ntL.tz,..
~C.~R EIr""lf~~
~--
~ -Mle It,,A...rl*.*:"~
- jdr;-1M".....71#'
fZi2.1
~- -
r~......21/L
... ---."j 1 1.
l.siiar..--.
I.....A.I
~
~~~.
-l)~
o..JIIl:Jt't""
- 9.
.L.;~
~7£w~*~~
- ~-~~lE Tci'
~flj, j)
~
I" II
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
I F YOU SIGN ON TO THIS EXAM SECURITY AGREEMENT YOU MUST WEAR A BADGE IDENTIFYING YOU AS COVERED BY THE EXAM SECURITY AGREEMENT
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 'Soa +8/tbas of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised,
- 2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I d.idi:.tPJ.QtyI,Jlge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 3/1UI2.':\\ ~~Om'thtn:rate that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY
- 1.
\\), E lA\\lAfc) leAb ~h.L11-\\OJ2, fii'::>l..AM. A-"-"11r+ [) (L
~.~
- 6. %Y I, C tn I£lrt!)
- 7.
f'f""'::1 \\=\\"....\\"'
- 8.
- IPSt:: pl >'6 Of '?7
- 9.
Be joJJ6 10
~~: E~~fra~
~~!l3kftC
- 13. m~=J~
- 14.
&n'D-AYP
- 15. v'~d; z' 6df'Y' S~
~~n;.- A'Y~~"'"
S;~ ""'.::;;:\\'..(
$vop,,("'.
$//",",IAnl? 's-""PI.>/{/
r;s-o;
"""" ~......-lcpA't cJ/'c-r....6"r
~
I L(t>.......
..,s...n~...
li1if1iC7t:J1l.. - P Control tZaO'f'tll.. f'lDvod:o,,...
~Ot... A:x:>1\\.\\ -OPE'r~
$"~p NOTES:
- ~SCHJfJ6L 'S16tJD 0" 10 "'\\"HE- ~~c.. eXAM. se<z'u(2ITY AC;zF-tMT AfZE. AlSo covC1Z.F-})
Fa fL. 11+1.2 AU VIT GXA-M
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Date of Examination: August 13,2012 Operating Test Number: 2012
- 1. General Criteria a,
The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e,g" 10 CFR 55.45. operational Importance. safety function distribution),
- b.
There!s no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination, The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s), (See Section D,1,8,)
Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.
It appears that the opera1lng test wiUdifferentiate between competent and less-than competent applicants at the designated Ii~nse level.
- 2. Walk-Through Criteria a,
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable; Initial conditions initiating ctles refererieesang lools, including assoqiatedprocedl4res reasonable and vallQ8tEld time limitS (average time allowed f9r completion) and specific designation ifdeernecl to Qe tlmEKtitical by the facility llcenSee operationally ImpOrtant specific performance criteria that include:
detailed eXpected actions with exact crlta~ and nomenclatl4re system respons$Brtd other examIner cues
$t!'~!!l~ts~~&gr:i~!I2!LItnJ?2~~ObS~!!~ti~!l~ to~~~~e~y the applit:lint criteria for successful cbmpletion Qf the t~sk identification of crfflcal steps anq thai( assoclo'lted perform!;l~ stand~rds resi.rlctionson tttllsequence Qf steps, if appilcaQle.
- b.
EtJ$ure th~tt;AY cbangesff9111 the~vloU$ly approv!!d~y$t~sand ~dmlr!lstnltive walk-throi.lgh oullliles (Forms E~1.fand 2)haveoot ~l.Ised the test topeviate frOIl'l any of the acceptance crl!er~(e,9., item gjlitrlblltion.l>a.n~ use, repetition from the last t NRC examinations) specifjed on tholie fOrm}> am1 Form ES.2Q1*2.
~
- 3. Slfnufator Cl'Itarta The associated siml,llator operating tests (scenario sets) have beell revieWed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
a Author*
b, Facility Reviewer (.)
C. NRC ChiefExaminer (fi)
- d. NRC Supervisor I
/
NOTE:
.. The facility signature is hot applicable for NRC-devel~pedte;t$.
a OC, 1fi
~
~I
~
Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column *c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
Initials b*
C#
rJ.
f fY (f'
IY r
~
1-tv'
- 1.
IJ Date fp}&::'>/J2
"/30 liZ, lJ/r/r i
ES-301 Simulator Scenario QuaUty Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: CCNPP Date ofExam: 8/13/12 Scenario Numbers: 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 Operating Test #: 2012 Initials a
b*
c#
j)
} ~
k [P III {
I) r
(
J) ! r '(y flFL r /V JLL I~
~
1)1} & /}/'
/)
}
N J IJ
~ tV tl/! d-r
.! JJj
~ r nIL
~
~
IiI
(~ rr
!JII I---
/'"
I )1{
tY'"
'!)Il r
I)
V
- V' I !f V
'.iIF!
- t/
QUAUTA TIVE ATTRIBUTES
- 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out ofservice, but it does not cue the operators into expected eVlmts.
- 2. The scenarios consist mostly ofrelated events.
- 3. Each event description consists of
- the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
- the malfunction( s) that are entered to initiate the event
- the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
- the expected operator actions (by shift position)
- the event termination point (ifapplicable)
- 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
- 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
- 6. Sequencing and timing ofevents is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
- 7. Iftime compression techniques are used. the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
Cues are given.
- 8. The simulator modeling is not altered.
- 9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 ofES 301.
- 11. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number oftransients and events specified on Form ES-30 1*5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
- 12. The level ofdifficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d)
- 1. Total malfunctions (5-8)
- 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)
- 3. Abnormal events (2-4)
- 4. Major transients (1-2)
- 5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)
- 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)
- 7. Critical tasks (2-3)
Actual Attributes 5/7/6/6 11112/2 2/2/2/2 1111111 1111111 0/0/0/1 3/3/3/3 I
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 IFacility: CCNPP Date ofExam: 8/13/12 Operating Test #: 20121 Scenarios A
E V
E 1
2 3
4 P
P N
MINIMUM L
T T
Crew
(*)
I Crew Position Crew Position Crew Position 0
Position C
T T
A A
Y S
A B
S A
B S
A B
S
\\.
B N
P L
R T
0 R
T 0
R T
0 R
0 R
I U
T E
0 C
P 0
C P
0 C
P 0
C P
RX 1
I 1
1 1
1 0
NOR 2
2 1
I 0
1 I
1 Ii I2J RO-l 3
2 3
4 2
4 5
I 4
6 4
4 2
S+/-if MAJ 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
I 1
I I
2 2
2 I
TS 2
2
.)
2 0
0 2
2 RX 1
1 I
1 1
1 1
0 NOR 2
2 1
1 0
1 1
1 I2J RO-2 IIC 3
2 3
5 4
4 4
2 4
5 1
4 6
4 4
2 MAJ I
1 I
1 I
I 1
1 1
I 1
1 2
2 2
1 TS 2
2 3
2 0
0 2
2 RX 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
0 NOR 2
2 1
I 0
1 I
1 I2J RO-3 IIC 3
2 3
5 4
4 4
2 4
5 1
4 10 I2J RO-4 MAJ 1
1 I
1 I
1 I
1 1
1 1
1 3
TS 2
2
.)
2 0
0 2
2 RX I
1 I
1 1
1 1
0 NOR 2
2 I
1 1
ili+/-]
rrn= 1 I2J SROI-l IIC 3
2 3
5 4
4 4
2 4
5 4
11 4
4 2
MAJ 1
I I
1 1
1 1
I I
1 I
3 2
2 1
TS 2
2 3
2 5
0 2
2 RX 1
1 I
1 1
1 1
0 NOR 2
1 1
2 1
1 1
~ SROI-2 IIC 3
2 5
4 4
4 2
4 5
1 4
10 4
4 2
MAJ 1
1 1
1 I
1 I
1 1
1 1
I 3
2 2
1 TS 2
1 3
2 2
0 2
2 RX 1
1 1
I 1
1 1
0 NOR 2
2 I
1 2
1 1
1
~ SROI-3 IIC 3
2 3
5 4
4 4
2 4
5 I
4 7
4 4
2 MAJ 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
I 2
2 2
I TS 2
2 3
2 2
0 1
2
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: CCNPP Date of Exam: 8113/12 Operating Test #: 2012 E
Scenarios A
V P
E 1
2 3
4 MINIMUM P
T N
(*)
L 0
T Crew I
Crew Position Crew Position Crew Position T
Position C
A T
A L
Y S
A B
S A
B S
A B
S A
B N
P R
T 0
R T
0 R
T 0
R T
0 R
I U
T E
0 C
P 0
C P
0 C
P 0
C P
RX I
I I
1 1
1 1
0 NOR 2
2 1
1 0
J 1
1
~ SROI-4 I1C 3
2 3
S 4
4 4
2 4
5 I
4 7
4 4
2 MAJ 1
I I
1 1
I 1
I 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
1 TS 2
2 3
2 2
0 2
2 RX I
1 1
1 1
1 I
0 NOR 2
2 1
1 2
1 1
1
~ SROI-S I1C 3
2 3
5 4
4 4
2 4
5 1
4 11 4
4 2
MAJ 1
1 I
I 1
I 1
I I
1 1
1 3
2 2
I TS 2
2 3
2 S
0 2
2 RX 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
0 NOR 2
2 1
1 2 lEE
~ SROI-6 I/C 3 21 3 5
4 4
4 2
4 5
1 4
11 4
4 2
MAl 1
1 1
1 1
1 I
1 1
1 1
1 3
2 2
I TS 2
2 3
2 3
0 2
2 RX I
I 1
1 1
1 1
0 R
2 2
1 1
2 1
1 1
[8J SROI-7 I1C 3
2 I 3 5
4 4
4 2
4 5
1 4
9 4
4 2
MAJ 1
1 1
1 1
I 1
1 1
1 1
1 3
2 2
I TS 2
2 3
2 2
0 2
2 RX 1
1 1
1 0
1 1
0 NOR 2
2 I
1 2
I 1
1
~ SROU-I I1C 3
2 3
5 4
4 4
2 4
5 1
4 8
4 4
2 MAJ I
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
1 TS 2
2 3
2 2
0 2
2 RX 1
I I
1 0
1 1
0 NOR 2
2 I
1 2
1 1
1
~ SROU-2 I/C 3
2 3
S 4
4 4
2 4
5 1
4 8
4 4
2 MAl 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
I 1
1 I
I 2
2 2
1 TS 2
2 3
2 2
0 2
2
ES-30t Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Instructions:
I. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-I event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the A TC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IJC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the A TC position. Ifan Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IJC malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.S.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a ofAppendix D. ("') Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a I-for-l basis.
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 II Facility: CCNPP Date ofExam: 8/13/12 Operating Test #: 2012 SCENARIO 1 I
I APPLICANTS
~CRO OCRO OCRO o SRO-I o SRO-I
~SRO-I o SRO-I COMPETENCIES o SRO-U OSRO-U OSRO-U
~SRO-U InterpreU1)ia~ose 2,3,6 & 7 I, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 1,2,3,4,5,6& 7 Events and Conditions Comply With and Use 2,3,6 & 7 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,6 & 7 1,2,3,4,5,6& 7 Procedures (1)
Operate Control 2,3,6& 7 1,3,4,5,6& 7 N/A N/A Boards (2)
Communicate and 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6 & 7 1,2,3,4,5,6& 7 1,2,3,4,5,6&7 1,2,3,4,5,6&7 Interact Demonstrate N/A N/A 1,2,3,4,5,6& 7 1,2,3,4,5,6&7 Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use N/A N/A 2,4 2,4 Tech Specs (3)
Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 1Facility: CCNPP Date of Exam: 8113/12 Operating Test #: 20121 SCENAlRI02 I
I APPLICANTS 181 RO ORO ORO ORO OCRO 181 CRO OCRO OCRO o SRO-I o SRO-I 181 SRO-I o SRO-I COMPETENCIES OSRO-U OSRO-U OSRO-U 181 SRO-U InterpretIDia~ose 1,2,3,4,5, & 6 3,4,5,6& 7 1,2,3,4,5,6 & 7 1,2,3,4, 5,6 & 7 Events and Conditions Comply With and Use 1,2,3,4, 5, & 6 3,4,5,6 & 7 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 1,2,3,4,5,6& 7 Procedures (1)
Operate Control 1,2,3,4,5, & 6 3,4,5,6 & 7 N/A N/A Boards (2)
Communicate and 1,2,3,4,5, & 6 3,4,5,6& 7 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 1,2,3,4,5,6& 7 Interact Demonstrate N/A N/A 1,2,3,4,5,6& 7 1,2,3,4,5,6 & 7 Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use N/A N/A 3,4 3,4 Tech Specs (3)
Notes:
(4) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(5) Optional for an SRO-U.
(6) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: CCNPP Date of Exam: 8/13/12 Operating Test #: 2012 SCENARIO 3 I
I APPLICANTS I8IRO ORO ORO ORO OCRO 181 CRO OCRO OCRO o SRO-I o SRO-I 181 SRO-I o SRO-I COMPETENCIES o SRO-U o SRO-U OSRO-U 181 SRO-U InterpretlDiagnose Events and Conditions 1,2,3,4& 5 1,2,3,4.&5 1,2, 5&6 1,2,3,4,5 & 6 Comply With and Use Procedures (1) 1,2,3,4& 5 L 2, 3,4, & 5 1,2,3,4,5&6 I, 2, 3,4, 5 & 6 Operate Control Boards (2) 1,2,3,4& 5 I, 2, 3,4, & 5 N/A N/A Communicate and Interact 1,2,3.4& 5 I. 2. 3.4, & 5 1,2,3,4,5&6 1,2,3,4.5&6 Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)
NiA N/A 1,2.3,4,5&6 I. 2, 3,4, 5 & 6 Comply With and Use Tech Specs (3)
N/A N/A 1,2&4 1.2&4 Notes:
(7) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(8) Optional for an SRO-U.
(9) Only applicable to SROs, Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: CCNPP Date of Exam: 8/13/12 Operating Test #: 2012 SCENARIO 4 I
I APPLICANTS I2J RO ORO ORO ORO OCRO I2J CRO OCRO OCRO o SRO-I o SRO-I I2J SRO-I o SRO-I COMPETENCIES o SRO-U o SRO-U o SRO-U I2J SRO-U InterpretlDiagnose 4,5 & 6 1,2,3,4,&5 I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8 I, 2, 3, 4, 5,6, 7 & 8 Events and Conditions Comply With and Use 4,5,6,7& 8 1,2,3,4, & 5 I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8 I, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7 & 8 Procedures (1)
Operate Control 4,5,6,7& 8 I, 2, 5, 6, 7 & 8 N/A N/A Boards (2)
Communicate and I, 2, 3, 4, 5., 6, 7 & 8 I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8 I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8 I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8 Interact Demonstrate NiA NiA I, 2, 3,4, 5,6, 7 & 8 I, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7 & 8 Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use N/A NiA 1&3 1&3 Tech Specs (3)
Notes:
(lO)Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(l1)Optional for an SRO-U.
(l2)Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301 Transient and Event Cbecklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: CCNPP Date ofExam: 8113/12 Operating Test #: 2012 A
E Scenarios P
P v
E I
2 3
4 L
I C
N T
T Crew Position Crew Position Crew Position Crew Position T
0 T
MINIMUM
(*)
A N
T Y
p E
S R
0 A
T C
B 0
P S
R 0
A T
C B
0 P
S R
0 A
T C
B 0
P S
R 0
A T
C B
0 P
A L
R I
U RX 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
0 NOR 2
2 1
1 0
1 1
1 I:8J RO-I IIC 3
2 3
5 4
4 4
1 4
4 1
4 6
4 4
2 MAJ 1
1 1
1 I
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
1 TS 2
2 2
1 0
0 2
2 RX 1
I 1
1 1
1 0
NOR 2
2 1
1 0
1 1
I I:8J RO-2 IIC 3
2 3
5 4
4 1
4 4
1 4
6 4
4 2
MAJ 1
1 1
1 1
1 I
I 1
I 1
2 2
2 1
TS 2
2 2
1 0
0 2
2 RX 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
0 I:8J RO-3 IZI RO-4 NOR I/C 2
3 2
2 3
5 4
4 4
1 4
1 4
I 1
4 0
10 1
4 1
4 1
2 MAJ I
1 1
1 I
I 1
1 1
1 1
1 3
2 2
1 TS 2
2 2
1 0
0 2
2 RX 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
0 NOR 2
2 1
1 2
1 1
1 IZI SROI-I IIC 3
2 3
5 4
4 4
1 4
4 1
4 11 4
4 2
MAJ 1
1 1
1 1
I 1
1 1
1 1
I 3
2 2
1 I:8J SROI-2 TS RX NOR IIC 2
2 3
1 2
2 3 H 2
S 4
4 4
1 1
4 1
1 4
1 1
1 4
4 1
2 9
0 1
1 4
2 1
1 4
2 0
1 2
MAJ TS RX NOR 1
2 2
I 1
1 2
1 2
1 1
1 1
2 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 3
2 1
2 tlili 1
1 1
IZI SROI-3 IIC 3
2 3
5 4
4 4
1 4
4 1
4 7
4 4
2 MAJ 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 J
1 1
1 2
2 2
I TS 2
2 2
I 2
0 2
2
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: CCNPP Date ofExam: 8/13/12 Operating Test #: 20121 A
E Scenarios P
P L
I C
V E
N T
T I
Crew Position 2
Crew Position 3
Crew Position 4
Crew Position T
0 T
A MINIMUM
(*)
A N
T Y
P E
S R
0 A
T C
B 0
P S
R 0
A T
C B
0 P
S R
0 A
T C
B 0
P S
R 0
A T
C B
0 P
L R
I U
RX 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
0 NOR 2
2 1
1 0
1 1
1 IZI SROI-4 I/C 3
2 3
5 4
4 4
1 4
4 1
4 6
4 4
2 MAJ 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
1 TS 2
2 2
1 2
0 2
2 RX I
1 1
1 1
1 1
0 NOR 2
2 1
1 2
1 1
1 IZI SROI-5 IIC 3
2 3
5 4
4 4
1 4
4 1
4 11 4
4 2
MAJ 1
1 1
1 1
I 1
I I
I 1
I 3
2 2
I TS 2
2 2
1 4
0 2
2 RX I
1 1
1 1
1 1
0 NOR 2
2 1
1 2
I 1
I IZI SROI-6 IIC 3
2 3
5 4
4 4
1 4
4 1
4 11 4
4 2
MAJ 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 3
2 2
1 TS 2
2 2
1 2
0 2
2 RX 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
0 NOR 2
2 1
1 2
1 1
1 IZI SROI-7 IIC 3
2 3
5 4
4 4
1 4
4 1
4 8
4 4
2 MAJ 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 3
2 2
1 TS 2
2 2
1 2
0 2
2 RX 1
1 1
1 0
1 1
0 NOR 2
2 1
1 2
1 1
1 IZI SROU-I I/C 3
2 3
5 4
4 4
1 4
4 1
4 8
4 4
2 MAJ 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
1 TS 2
2 2
1 2
0 2
2 RX 1
1 1
1 0
1 1
0 NOR 2
2 1
1 2
1 1
1 IZI SROU-2 IIC 3
2 3
5 4
4 4
1 4
4 1
4 8
4 4
2 MAJ 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
1 TS 2
2 2
1 2
0 2
2
Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Instructions:
- 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-I event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the A TC position. Ifan Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the A TC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a ofAppendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a I-for-l basis.
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand colunms.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-30t-6 Facility: CCNPP Date ofExam: 8/13/12 Operating Test #: 2012 SCENARIO 1 I
I APPLICANTS I8IRO ORO ORO ORO OCRO 181 CRO OCRO OCRO o SRO-I o SRO-I 181 SRO-I o SRO-I COMPETENCIES OSRO-U o SRO-U OSRO-U 181 SRO-U InterpretlDiagnose 2,3,6& 7 1,3,4,5,6& 7 1,2,3,4,5,6& 7 1,2,3,4,5,6& 7 Events and Conditions Comply With and Use 2,3,6 & 7 1,3,4, 5,6 & 7 1,2,3,4,5,6& 7 1,2,3,4,5,6& 7 Procedures (1)
Operate Control 2,3,6& 7 1,3,4, 5,6 & 7 N/A N/A Boards (2)
Communicate and 1,2,3,4,.5,6& 7 1,2,3,4, 5, 6 & 7 1,2,3,4,5, 6 & 7 1,2,3,4,5,6& 7 Interact Demonstrate N/A N/A 1,2,3,4, 5, 6 & 7 1,2,3,4, 5, 6 & 7 Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use N/A N/A 2
2 Tech Specs (3)
Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 II Facility: CCNPP Date ofExam: 8113/12 Operating Test #: 2012 SCENARIO 2 I
I APPLICANTS
[g1 CRO OCRO OCRO o SRO-I o SRO-I
[g1 SRO-I o SRO-I COMPETENCIES OSRO-U OSRO-U OSRO-U
[g1 SRO-U InterpretIDiagnose 1, 2, 3,4, 5, & 6 3,4,5,6& 7 1,2,3,4,5,6& 7 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 Events and Conditions Comply With and Use 1,2,3,4,5, & 6 3,4,5,6& 7 1,2,3,4,5,6& 7 1,2,3,4,5,6 & 7 Procedures (1)
Operate Control 1,2,3,4,5, & 6 3,4,5,6 & 7 N/A N/A Boards (2)
Communicate and 1,2,3,4,5, & 6 3,4,5,6& 7 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 1,2,3,4,5,6& 7 Interact Demonstrate N/A N/A 1,2,3,4,5,6& 7 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use N/A N/A 1,3 1,3 Tech Specs (3)
Notes:
(4) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(5) Optional for an SRO-U.
(6) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: CCNPP Date ofExam: 8/13/12 Operating Test #: 2012 SCENARIO 3 I
I APPLICANTS IZI RO ORO ORO ORO OCRO IZI CRO OCRO OCRO o SRO-I o SRO-I IZI SR()..)
o SRO-I COMPETENCIES OSRO-U OSRO-U OSRO-U IZI SR()"U lnterpretIDia~ose 1,2,3, & 4 1,2,3,4, & 5 1,2,3,4, & 5 1,2,3,4, & 5 Events and Conditions Comply With and Use 1,2,3, &4 1,2,3,4, & 5 1,2,3,4, & 5 1,2,3,4, & 5 Procedures (1)
Operate Control 1,2,3,&4 1,2,3,4, & 5 N/A N/A Boards (2)
Communicate and 1,2,3, & 4 1,2,3,4, & 5 1,2,3,4, & 5 1,2,3,4, & 5 Interact Demonstrate N/A N/A 1,2,3,4,&5 1,2,3,4, & 5 Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use N/A N/A 1,3 1,3 Tech Specs (3)
Notes:
(7) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(8) Optional for an SRO-U.
(9) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: CCNPP Date of Exam: 8/13/12 Operating Test #: 20ll SCENARIO 4 I
I APPLICANTS
[8i CRO OCRO OCRO o SRO-I o SRO-I r8I SRO-I o SRO-J COMPETENCIES OSRO-U OSRO-U OSRO-U r8I SRO-U InterpreV1)ia~ose 4,5&6 1,2,3,4,&5 1,2,3,4,5 & 6 1,2,3,4,5&6 Events and Conditions Comply With and Use 3,4,5&6 1,2,3,4,&5 1,2,3,4, 5 & 6 1,2,3,4,5&6 Procedures (1)
Operate Control 4,5&6 1,2,3,4,&5 N/A N/A Boards (2)
Communicate and 1,2,3,4,5 & 6 1,2,3,4,5 & 6 1,2,3,4,5&6 I, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 Interact Demonstrate N/A N/A 1,2,3,4,5 & 6 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use N/A N/A 1
I Tech Specs (3)
Notes:
(10)Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(l1)Optional for an SRO-U.
(l2)Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type andenter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Calvert Cliffs Date of Exam: 8/23/12 Exam Level:
RO 123:]
SRO 123:]
Item Description
- 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
- 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
~.
- 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
- 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
- 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants I
a
~
@L l:\\:G
~
~
- a. Grader:
- b. Facility Reviewer(*):
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*):
- d. NRC Supervisor (*):
Printed Name/Signature IJ.F, \\.AvA'fb ~CvJJo
'l<kvt'd~~/~
J ylJ,JiY 4-J
'!j;aL
]),..,,(,t f. J~2r.J~ )
Initials b
c flub,:?
tJJA-p BM y fJ'
~
j2JA 7 r?
~
Date 8/2!lLJZ
~(V1.l}v C) 6. J LL~(L r[ 17 [2t)f L.
(*)
The facility reviewer's Signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Date of Exam: August 13,2012 Exam Level: RO ~ SRO ~
Initial II Item Description
- 1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.
- 2. a. NRC KlAs are referenced for all questions.
- b. Facility leaming objectives are referenced as available.
- 4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office).
- 5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
o the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or o the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or o the examinations were developed independently; or
~ the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or o other (explain)
- 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only question distribution(s) at right.
- 7. Between 50 and 60 percent ofthe questions on the RO exam are written at the comprehension! analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KlAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right.
- 8. Referenceslhandouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.
~
'8 IY
- 9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; rr deviations are justified.
'8 ~
- 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.
1!Ir II e ~
- 11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.
b } Iv II Printed Na~ature Date
- a.
Author Domenic F. Lavato
/flY'/UN}b 1-27-12
- b.
Facility Reviewer (Oo)
Richard C. Jones
/r\\ A 1.. Z~* t7.
- c.
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
!,-f
- Il
- d.
NRC Regional Supervisor
)
8-1-1Z I
Note:
- The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NR~eveiOPed examinations.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column *c n
- chief examiner concurrence required.