ML12291A688
| ML12291A688 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 08/06/2012 |
| From: | David Reeser NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Nelson J Exelon Generation Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML11354A121 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML12291A688 (2) | |
Text
2012 DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION INITIAL EXAMINATION OUTLINE SUBMITTAL
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Dresden Date of Examination: 8/G,/J2..
Item Task Description Initials a
b*
c#
- 1.
W A
I T
T E
N
- a.
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.
1ft "'P I~
- b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section 0.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
- c.
Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
I~
I~
.~
IP
'D
~
t?
- d.
Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
D
-~
- 2.
S I
M U
L A
T 0
A
- a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, Instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
fA
-;::::> Ol
- b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants In accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity. and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit testes), and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
~ "D UZ-
- c.
To the extent pOSSible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
tJv D ~
- 3.
W I
T
- a.
Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1 ) the outllne(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of altemate path, low-power, emergency. and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form
~
-;:::> e.
- b.
Verify that the ad,ministrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1 ) the tasks are distributed among the topics as speCified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
!f rY
~e CD"
- c.
Determine If there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subseauent davs.
~ D J?
- 4.
G E
N E
A A
L
- a.
Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PAA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section.
~. D rJZ
- b.
Assess whether the 10 CFA 55,41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
- a. U iJZ
- c.
Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
-~ V
~
- d.
Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
'~ C UZ-
- e.
Check the entire exam for baiance of coverage.
-a,. V iJZ.
- f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SAO).
a-. 'D oz
.:r~..AJt!.Jso:rint~N~~~L Date
- a. Author
- $lu../f,t..
..",./
- b. Facility Aeviewer (*)
.,-HO....A'!o "D,TCH,:'t.<<..t:::l I.
"7A:~
~ E
- c. NAC Chief Examiner (#)
~\\J~ W Keese r / lU£.l )/1.) fL(}'I.i~V
- d. NAC Supervisor
/JLA....." IJ L
£¥.,;..I'lIM.
I e~,,'.L'5 Wt.lltl'1or l.t I'lL.
I NOTE:
- Independent NRC Reviewer initial items in Column "CO; chief examiner concurrence required.
- Not applicable for NAC-preoared examination outlines.
ES-201, Page 26 of 28