|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML24149A3532024-05-24024 May 2024 Change in Estimated Review Schedule for Nextera Common Emergency Plan Amendment ML24122C6922024-05-0101 May 2024 NextEra Fleet EP Amendment - Demonstration Drill ML24115A2362024-03-28028 March 2024 Acceptance Review: Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME Code for Examination of Control Rod Drive Mechanism (Rod) Housing H-4 Canopy Seal Weld ML23173A1522023-06-22022 June 2023 Request for Additional Information NextEra Fleet Emergency Plan Amendment Request ML23156A3042023-05-31031 May 2023 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Remove Period of Applicability from Pressure Temperature Limits and Low Temperature Over Pressure Protection Curves ML23109A1862023-04-19019 April 2023 and Turkey Point Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Proposed Alternative to Asme Section XI Authorizing Implementation of Asme Code Case N-752-1 ML23066A1892023-03-0303 March 2023 OEDO-22-00419: Email Dated 3-3-2023 to Petitioner on Seabrook ASR Petition ML23066A0892023-02-24024 February 2023 OEDO-22-00419 - Email Dated 02/24/2023 to Petitioner on Seabrook Unit 1 ASR Petition ML23020A9392023-01-19019 January 2023 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise Cooling Tower Service Water Loop or Cell Requirements (EPID L-2022-LLA-0183) (Email) ML23011A3082023-01-11011 January 2023 Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request 4RA-22-001 (L-2022-LLR-0074) ML22341A0012022-12-0606 December 2022 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Request 4RA-22-001, Proposed Alternative in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2) ML22333A7452022-11-22022 November 2022 OEDO-22-00419 - Email: C-10 Response on PRB Initial Assessment - C-10 Petition on Seabrook ASR Concrete Degradation ML22287A1472022-10-13013 October 2022 2.026 Petition Screen-in Email ML22228A0552022-08-15015 August 2022 Request for Additional Information Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report Review ML22200A1082022-07-19019 July 2022 Acceptance Review for TSTF-577 Amendment ML22153A4152022-05-31031 May 2022 Request for Additional Information Re 120V Inverter LAR from TS Branch - Final ML22116A2442022-04-26026 April 2022 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Request 3IR-18 and 3IR-19 for End of Third 10-Year ISI Interval for Examinations with Limited Coverage ML22048B5522022-02-17017 February 2022 LTR-22-0010 Reply to Geoff Gilbert Email Concern About Seabrook Station Concrete Degradation ML22062B6642022-02-0707 February 2022 Request for Additional Information 120V Inverter LAR from the Electrical Branch ML22063A0002022-01-25025 January 2022 Requests for Additional Information from Risk Branch Regarding 120V Inverter LAR ML22020A2542022-01-20020 January 2022 LTR-22-0010 Geoff Gilbert, E-mail Concern About Seabrook Station Concrete Degradation ML21097A2512021-04-0707 April 2021 Request for Additional Information Regarding Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report Review for RFO 20 (EPID L-2020-LRO-0066) (Email) ML21054A0482021-02-23023 February 2021 Request for Additional Information Regarding Heat Flux Hot Channel Requirement Amendment Request ML20343A0942020-12-0303 December 2020 Request for Additional Information Regarding Seabrook (COVID-19) Part 73 Force-on-Force Exemption Request (L-2020-LLE-0219) ML20273A2812020-09-22022 September 2020 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action License Amendment Request to Resolve Non-Conservative Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor Requiments ML20258A1502020-09-14014 September 2020 Request for Additional Information Related to Seabrook License Amendment Request Regarding One-Time Change to the AC Sources Operating TS ML20260H4932020-09-11011 September 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Comanche Peak - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action - Request to Use Later Code Edition of ASME OM Code ML20230A2962020-08-14014 August 2020 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action License Amendment Request to Allow a One-Time Change to the AC Sources Operating TS ML20167A1842020-06-11011 June 2020 Request for Additional Information Related to Seabrook License Amendment Request Regarding TSTF-411 and TSTF-418 (L-2019-LLA-0237) ML20124A0012020-05-0101 May 2020 Cancellation of Call with Seabrook on Steam Generator Tube Inspections ML20114E1592020-04-23023 April 2020 Email and Request for Additional Information Related to Seabrook License Amendment Request to Degraded Voltage Time Delay Setpoint (L-2020-LLA-0012) ML20101N0932020-04-10010 April 2020 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re Relief Request to Defer ASME Inspections Due COVID-19 (EPIDs L-2020-LLR-0055, -56, and -57) ML20101L0402020-04-10010 April 2020 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Request to Use Code Case OMN-13 with 2012 Edition of the OM Code ML20101H3912020-04-0808 April 2020 Verbal Authorization for Seabrook Relief Request 3IIR-7 ML20087K8262020-03-27027 March 2020 Upcoming Steam Generator Tube Inservice Inspection ML20063J9792020-02-28028 February 2020 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise Degraded Voltage Time Delay Setpoint ML19347C6732019-12-13013 December 2019 Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-418 ML19296D9122019-10-23023 October 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information Related to Seabrook Inverter Amendment (L-2019-LLA-0216) ML19295F5422019-10-15015 October 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise Onsite Power Distribution Requirements ML19275G7832019-10-0101 October 2019 Limited Appearance Statement from New Hampshire State Representative, Robert Harb Regarding the Seabrook Station Unit 1 License Amendment Application ML19270E6512019-09-27027 September 2019 Limited Appearance Statement from Joanna Hammond Regarding the Seabrook Station Unit 1 License Amendment Application ML19270E6542019-09-26026 September 2019 Limited Appearance Statement from Brian Campbell Regarding the Seabrook Station Unit 1 License Amendment Application ML19196A3592019-07-15015 July 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise the Emergency Core Cooling System Accumulator Technical Specifications ML19169A2412019-06-13013 June 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Relief Requests for the Containment Building Spray Pump Flow and Vibration Testing (Epids L-2019-LLR-00 and L-2019-LLR-00) ML19162A0662019-06-0404 June 2019 Reply to Mr. Rick Jakious'S E-mail of 5-29-2019 to Stephen B. Comley Sr., We the People with Attachments ML19112A1782019-04-22022 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Point Beach; Seabrook; Turkey Point - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-563 ML19101A4042019-04-11011 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Point Beach; Seabrook; St. Lucie; Turkey Point - Acceptance of Licensing Action Relief Request to Use Encoded Phased Array Ultrasonic Examination Techniques for Ferritic and Austenitic Welds ML19070A2382019-03-10010 March 2019 LTR-19-0088 Maura Healey, Attorney General, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Ltr NextEras Requests for a License Amendment and Twenty-year Extension Prior to Issuance of a Final Decision in Adjudicatory Hearing on Concrete Degradation at ML19056A4602019-02-25025 February 2019 Comment from Lisa Conti Regarding the Emergency Petition Filed by C-10 on February 13, 2019 ML19056A4582019-02-25025 February 2019 Comment from Deborah A. Jones Regarding the Emergency Petition Filed by C-10 on February 13, 2019 2024-05-24
[Table view] |
Text
Lehman, Bryce From: Sheikh, Abdul Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 3:21 PM To: Thomas, George; Lehman, Bryce Cc: Erickson, Alice; Plasse, Richard
Subject:
RE: Items identified in Today's Meeting Relevant to Seabrook Ok. Please do not communicate any information.
From: Thomas, George \ýV-Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 3:19 PM To: Lehman, Bryce; Sheikh, Abdul Cc: Erickson, Alice; Plasse, Richard
Subject:
RE: Items identified in Today's Meeting Relevant to Seabrook
- Bryce, What I was trying to say was that the ASTM C1293 "StandardTest Method for Determination of Length Change of Concrete Due to Alkali-Silica Reaction (also known as the Concrete Prism Test or CPT)" test is similar to Canadian test CSA A23.2-14A and is adopted from the Canadian Standard, and therefore, to address Abdul's concern, may be more effective than C1260 test in identifying ASR reactivity in granite aggregates. My source for the information is the attached PCA guide specification document - see Section 5.1.2 and Note 5. The ASTM C1567 test is a fast alternative to C1293. It is OK to convey a concern to the licensee but I agree with Rick Plasse that we should not be telling the licensee what to do over the phone. We can critique their test plan when they have a finalized plan for testing, or take a position elsewhere such as the TIA response if we have a firm one.
Thanks.
George __
From: Plasse, Richard Sent: Wednesday, Novembar 30, 2011 2:17 PM To: Lehman, Bryce; Thomas, George; Sheikh, Abdul Cc: Erickson, Alice
Subject:
RE: Items identified in Today's Meeting Relevant to Seabrook I am not saying anything to the licensee until NRC staff has a firm position. Shouldn't product of TIA address which standards are appropriate?
From: Lehman, Bryce Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 2:13 PM To: Thomas, George; Sheikh, Abdul Cc: Plasse, Richard; Erickson, Alice
Subject:
RE: Items identified in Today's Meeting Relevant to Seabrook I agree that standard may not be adequate for detecting reactive granite; however, I think George Thomas was trying to comment that ASTM C1293 is similar to the Canadian standard and may be more effective at detecting reactive granites. George could you comment on that?
If that is the case then it may be unnecessary to discuss the Canadian standard, especially with the licensee.
- Thanks, B/ryce
From: Sheikh, Abdul Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 12:36 PM To: Erickson, Alice; Lehman, Bryce; Plasse, Richard
Subject:
FW: Items identified in Today's Meeting Relevant to Seabrook I had an action item from this morning's call about the correct ASTM standard number. The correct number is ASTM C1260. As noted below, this ASTM standard is not as effective as the Canadian Standard. Can you please pass this information to the licensee. I did not write the telephone number.
From: Sheikh, Abdul Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 5:01 PM To: Raymond, William Cc: Auluck, Rajender; Lehman, Bryce; Conte, Richard; Modes, Michael; Chaudhary, Suresh; Thomas, George
Subject:
Items identified in Today's Meeting Relevant to Seabrook
- a. Mr. Katayama from Japan stated that:
- 1. ASTM C289, C227, and C295 tests for aggregates cannot identify ASR reactivity for slow expansive aggregates.
- 2. ASTM C1260, that is an improvement from the previous standard, cannot also effectively identify ASR reactivity in granite aggregates.
- 3. Tests specified in Canadian standard CSA A.2.23.2-14.A can identify ASR reactivity in granite aggregates.
If Seabrook has granite aggregates, it is better to test them in accordance with CSA A.2.23.2-14.A.
- b. Professor Sauoma stated that to determine the structural integrity of ASR affected concrete structures, it is better to perform non-linear analysis to capture the effect of cracking in concrete.
It may be useful to pass this message to the applicant.
Abdul From: Raymond, William Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 3:32 PM To: Sheikh, Abdul
Subject:
RE: ASR OK, thanks.
Too bad.
Bill From: Sheikh, Abdul Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 3:30 PM To: Raymond, William
Subject:
RE: ASR No From: Raymond, William Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 10:44 AM To: Erickson, Alice 2
Cc: Sheikh, Abdul
Subject:
RE: ASR
- Alice, Will these slides be put into Adams to be available publically?
There is information here that might be useful to the licensee's.
Bill From: Erickson, Alice Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 8:42 AM To: Raymond, William
Subject:
ASR
- Bill, Let me know if you can get to them through this zip file. Meanwhile, I will try to fix the SharePoint issue.
3