ML110530084

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

E-mail, Acceptance Review of ME5409 and ME5410 Application for Revision of TS 5.3.1 and COLR References for M5 Cladding: 1/13/11
ML110530084
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/18/2011
From: Mozafari B
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Caves J, Corlett D, Bass K, Lingham S
- No Known Affiliation
Mozafari B, NRR/ADRO/DORL, 415-2020
References
TAC ME5410, TAC ME5409
Download: ML110530084 (1)


Text

From: Mozafari, Brenda Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 12:36 PM To: 'Bass, Kimberly'; 'dave.corlett@pgnmail.com'; 'john.caves@pgnmail.com' Cc: Lingam, Siva

Subject:

FW: Acceptance review of ME5409 and ME 5410 Application for revision ofTS 5.3.1 and COLR References for M5 Cladding. 1/13/2011 Importance: High Acceptance review of ME5409 Application for revision ofTS 5.3.1 and COLR References for M5 Cladding. 1/13/2011 The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this amendment request . The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),

an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and follow as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the NRC staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Brenda L. Mozafari Senior Project Manager, NRR/DORL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-2020 email: brenda.mozafari@nrc.gov