ML100810441

Request for Hearing and Petition to Intervene by San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace

ML100810441
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	03/22/2010
From:	Curran D Harmon, Curran, Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, LLP, San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace
To:	NRC/SECY
SECY RAS
Shared Package
ML100810439	List: ML100810440 ML100810441 ML100810442
References
50-275-LR, 50-323-LR
Download: ML100810441 (49)

Text

March 22, 2010 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION In the matter of Pacific Gas and Electric Company Docket Nos. 50-275-LR Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant 50-323-LR Units 1 and 2 REQUEST FOR HEARING AND PETITION TO INTERVENE BY SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE I. INTRODUCTION In accordance with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRCs) hearing notice, 75 Fed. Reg. 3,493 (January 21, 2010), and pursuant to 10 CFR 2.309(f), San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace (SLOMFP) files this Request for Hearing and Petition to Intervene in the license renewal proceeding for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant (DCNPP).

II. DEMONSTRATION OF STANDING SLOMFP has been a participant in NRC licensing cases involving DCNPP since 1973.

The organization has standing to intervene in this case because many of its members live, work, and own property within 50 miles of the plant, and their interests may be affected by the results of the proceeding. Their health, safety, property value, and means of livelihood could be adversely affected by a licensing decision which permitted DCNPP to continue to operate for an extended period in a manner that is unsafe or harmful to the environment. For instance, if an accident and consequent offsite radiation release were to occur at DCNPP, the health, safety, property value, and means of livelihood of neighbors of the plant, including members of SLOMFP, could be seriously harmed. SLOMFP has attached declarations from four individual members who have authorized SLOMFP to bring this legal action on their behalves. See

Declaration of Elizabeth Apfelberg (Exhibit 1A), Declaration of Elaine Holder (Exhibit 1B),

Declaration of Lucy Jane Swanson (Exhibit 1C) and Declaration of Jill ZamEk (Exhibit 1D).

III. CONTENTIONS SLOMFPs contentions are set forth below. Section A contains SLOMFPs safety contention (labeled with the prefix TC). Section B contains SLOMFPs environmental contentions (labeled with the prefix EC).

A. Safety Contentions Contention TC 1 - Failure to demonstrate adequacy of program for management of aging equipment

1. Statement of the Contention: The applicant, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), has failed to satisfy 10 C.F.R. § 54.29s requirement to demonstrate a reasonable assurance that it can and will manage[e] the effects of aging on equipment that is subject to the license renewal rule, i.e., safety equipment without moving parts. In particular, PG&E has failed to show how it will address and rectify an ongoing pattern of management failures with respect to the operation and maintenance of safety equipment.

2. Brief Summary of Basis for the Contention: The NRCs standard for license renewal, 10 C.F.R. § 54.29(a), states that an operating license may be renewed if the Commission finds, among other things, that:

(a) Actions have been identified and have been or will be taken with respect to the matters identified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section, such that there is reasonable assurance that the activities authorized by the renewed license will continue to be conducted in accordance with the CLB [current licensing basis], and that any changes made to the plants CLB in order to comply with this paragraph are in accord with the Act and the Commissions regulations. These matters are:

(1) managing the effects of aging during the period of extended operation on the functionality of structures and components that have been identified to require review under § 54.21(a)(1).

2

In Appendix B of its license renewal application, PG&E describes its program for managing the aging equipment that is subject to the license renewal rule under 10 C.F.R. § 54.21(a)(1). As explained on page B-4, during the license renewal term, PG&E will use the same personnel to manage aging equipment that are described in the Final Safety Analysis Report for DCNPP, i.e., that PG&E currently uses. PG&Es aging management program is deficient because it does not discuss how it will avoid repeating the chronic and significant errors it is currently committing in the management of safety equipment at DCNPP.

Examples of these errors are provided in recent integrated inspection reports: Diablo Canyon Power Plant NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000275/2008005, 05000323/2008005 AND 07200026/2008001 (February 6, 2008) (IIR 08-05) (ADAMS Accession No. ML090370406); Diablo Canyon Power Plant NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000275/2009003 and 05000323/2009003 (August 5, 2009) (IIR 09-03) (ADAMS Accession No. ML092170781); Diablo Canyon Power Plant NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000275/2009005 and 05000323/2009005 (February 3, 2010) (IIR 09-05) (ML100341199).

These inspection reports document an ongoing failure of PG&E to properly identify, evaluate, and resolve problems and manage safety equipment. For example:

x In IIR-08-05, the NRC inspectors reported on their semi-annual trend review of PG&Es corrective action program and associated documents to identify trends that could indicate the existence of a more significant safety issue. Id., Enclosure at 24. The inspectors found an adverse trend in problem evaluation, concluding that:

PG&E used less than adequate thoroughness when evaluating problems resulting in the failure to identify the extent of conditions; and in some cases, adverse affects (sic) on the operability of Technical Specification required equipment.

3

This adverse trend began during the fourth quarter 2007 and continued through the fourth quarter 2008.

Id. at 24. The inspectors provided 11 separate examples of this adverse trend.

Id. at 24-25.

x In IIR 09-03, the inspectors semi-annual trend review found that the adverse trend in problem evaluation identified in IIR-08-05 continued during the first two quarters of 2009. Id., Enclosure at 21. The inspectors:

analyzed this trend and identified a common theme related to poor licensee management of the plant design/licensing bases and inconsistent implementation of regulatory administrative processes. The inspectors concluded that some issues identified in the trend could indicate the existence of a more significant concern affecting the NRCs ability to regulate the license.

Id. The inspectors then identified thirteen separate examples of instances of poor licensing and design basis management and five instances of deficiencies related to other administrative functions. Examples include:

x Failure to perform an adequate 50.59 evaluation for spent fuel pool special test This minor violation illustrated the licensees failure to implement the industry 50.59 program x Failure to perform an adequate 50.59 evaluation for modifications to the special protection scheme for the 500 kV switchyard This minor violation illustrated the licensees failure to implement the industry 50.59 program x An inadequate 50.59 evaluation for the Unit 1 containment sump modification This violation illustrated a failure to understand when prior NRC approval is required for change to the facility as described in the Final Safety Analysis Report Update.

x Violation of the station 50.59 evaluation procedure This finding illustrated the failure of the licensee to recognize a condition outside of the plant design basis associated with an explosive mixture of oxygen and hydrogen discovered in the Unit 2 reactor coolant drain tank, waste gas surge tank, and interconnecting piping.

x Violation of design control associated with the failure to maintain adequate capacity and capability of the emergency diesel generators. This finding 4

illustrated the failure of the licensee to understand and apply the plant design and licensing basis to onsite emergency power system.

NRC inspectors also noted an Adverse Trend in Design Margin and Capability of ac Power Systems in this report, affecting all three of the plant ac power systems. Id.,

Enclosure at 24.

x In IIR-09-05, once again the NRC inspectors found that adverse trends associated with the thoroughness of Pacific Gas and Electrics program evaluation, originally identified by the NRC in September 2008 [in IIR008-05] continued through 2009. Id., Enclosure at 35. Although IIR-09-05 describes various efforts by PG&E to correct the adverse trend, the NRC inspectors remained dissatisfied with the comprehensiveness of PG&Es analyses and corrective actions. Id. at 36-37.

The inspection reports cited above raise a genuine and material dispute regarding PG&Es ability to manage the effects of aging into the renewal period. The public has no reason for confidence that a renewed Diablo Canyon licensee would reasonably ensure protection of public health and safety. PG&E has shown that it cannot adequately identify, evaluate, and resolve maintenance problems involving safety equipment and systems.

3. Demonstration that the Contention is Within the Scope of the Proceeding: This contention is within the scope of the proceeding because it raises questions about the adequacy of PG&Es program for managing aging equipment under NRC regulations that must be satisfied before DCNPP can be re-licensed.

4. Demonstration that the Contention is Material to the Findings NRC Must Make to Re-License Diablo Canyon: Before the NRC may re-license DCNPP, it must conclude that PG&E can manage the effects of aging on passive equipment. Because PG&E has demonstrated 5

a consistent pattern of inadequate management of safety equipment, the contention is material to the findings that NRC must make in reviewing PG&Es operating license renewal application.

5. Concise Statement of the Facts or Expert Opinion Supporting the Contention, Along With Appropriate Citations to Supporting Scientific or Factual Materials: The facts which support Contention TC-1 are set forth in paragraph 2 above. The facts are reported in Appendix B of PG&Es operating license renewal application and in NRC inspection reports, to which SLOMFP has provided citations.

B. Environmental Contentions

1. Statutory and Regulatory Background The core requirement of NEPA is that for any federal action with a significant adverse effect on the human environment, federal agencies must prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) which includes a detailed statement regarding:

(i) the environmental impact of the proposed action, (ii) any adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided should the proposal be implemented, (iii) alternatives to the proposed action, (iv) the relationship between local short-term uses of man's environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity, and (v) any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources which would be involved in the proposed action should it be implemented.

San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace, 149 F.3d at 1020 (citing Dept. of Transp. v. Pub. Citizen, 541 U.S. 752, 756 (2004), 42 U.S.C. § 4332(2)(C)). NRC regulations also require that an NRC application for operating license renewal must be supported by an environmental report prepared by the applicant (10 C.F.R. § 51.53(c) and a supplemental EIS prepared by the NRC Staff. 10 C.F.R. § 51.95(c). In discussing alternatives to the proposed action, the applicant must discuss alternatives to mitigate severe accidents. 10 C.F.R. § 51.53(c)(3)(iii)(L). The NRC must also discuss mitigative alternatives in its supplemental EIS. 10 C.F.R. § 51.95(c)(2).

6

In addition, an Environmental Report or EIS must also address new and significant information that was not previously addressed in an EIS for the facility. 10 C.F.R. §§ 51.53(c)(iv), 51.92(a)(2).

The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) has promulgated regulations for the implementation of NEPA that are entitled to substantial deference by the NRC. San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. NRC, 449 F.3d 1016 (9th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 127 S.Ct. 1124 (2007)

(citing Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council, 490 U.S. 332, 355, (1989); Andrus v.

Sierra Club, 442 U.S. 347, 358 (1979)). Among those regulations, 40 C.F.R. § 1502.22 requires that:

When an agency is evaluating reasonably foreseeable significant adverse effects on the human environment in an environmental impact statement and there is incomplete or unavailable information, the agency shall always make clear that such information is lacking.

(a) If the incomplete information relevant to reasonably foreseeable significant adverse impacts is essential to a reasoned choice among alternatives and the overall costs of obtaining it are not exorbitant, the agency shall include the information in the environmental impact statement.

(b) If the information relevant to reasonably foreseeable significant adverse impacts cannot be obtained because the overall costs of obtaining it are exorbitant or the means to obtain it are not known, the agency shall include within the environmental impact statement:

1. A statement that such information is incomplete or unavailable.

2. a statement of the relevance of the incomplete or unavailable information to evaluating reasonably foreseeable significant adverse impacts on the human environment;

3. a summary of existing credible scientific evidence which is relevant to evaluating the reasonably foreseeable significant adverse impacts on the human environment, and

4. the agencys evaluation of such impacts based upon theoretical approaches or research methods generally accepted in the scientific community. For the purposes of this section, reasonably foreseeable includes impacts which have 7

catastrophic consequences, even if their probability of occurrence is low, provided that the analysis of the impacts is supported by credible scientific evidence, is not based on pure conjecture, and is within the rule of reason.

As the CEQ explained in promulgating 10 C.F.R. § 1502.22, the overall cost of providing complete information includes the timing of the information: CEQ intends that the term overall costs encompasses financial costs and other costs such as costs in terms of time (delay) and personnel. National Environmental Policy Act Regulations; Incomplete or Unavailable Information, 51 Fed. Reg. 15,618, 15,622 (April 25, 1986).

2. Contentions Contention EC-1: Failure of SAMA Analysis to Include Complete Information About Potential Environmental Impacts of Earthquakes and Related SAMAs

1. Statement of Contention: PG&Es Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) analysis fails to satisfy 40 C.F.R. § 1502.22 because it is not based on complete information that is necessary for an understanding of seismic risks to the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant and because PG&E has failed to acknowledge the absence of the information or demonstrated that the information is too costly to obtain. As a result of PG&Es failure to use complete information, the SAMA analysis does not satisfy the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for consideration of alternatives (see Idaho Conservation League v. Mumma, 956 F.2d 1508, 1519-20 (9th Cir. 1992)) or NRC implementing regulation 10 C.F.R. § 51.53(c)(3)(ii)(L).

8

2. Brief Summary of Basis for the Contention:

a. Factual Background In 2008, PG&E informed the NRC that it had identified a zone of seismicity that may indicate a previously unknown fault located offshore of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, which is known as the Shoreline Fault. NRC Research Information Letter 09-001, Preliminary Deterministic Analysis of Seismic Hazard at Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant from Newly Identified Shoreline Fault at 10-11 (April 8, 2009) (RIL-09-001) (ADAMS Accession No. ML090330523). The fault was identified as a result of a collaborative research program conducted jointly by PG&E and the United States Geological Survey (USGS) under the Collaborative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA). Id. As described in RIL-09-0001, the PG&E-USGS research program focused on increasing the understanding of tectonics in the region of the DCNPP, and included both new geophysical field studies and the application of advanced seismological techniques to small-magnitude recorded earthquakes. Id.

While describing the fault as hypothesized and potential (id.), PG&E and the NRC Staff both immediately took actions to address the significance of the newly discovered fault.

First, both PG&E and the NRC Staff undertook assessments to determine whether the fault posed any hazard to the ongoing operation of DCNPP that had not been previously taken into consideration. Id. These analyses were deterministic in nature and were based on the preliminary information that had been yielded to date by the PG&E-USGS research program.

Id.

Second, PG&E worked with the USGS to reallocate resources to characterize the Shoreline Fault rather than retaining the original focus that is more regional in nature. Id. at 3.

9

At the end of 2008, PG&E issued an Action Plan to carry out this reallocation effort. Id. As described in the Action Plan document:

The Plan has three objectives. The first objective is to characterize the Shoreline fault in terms of its location, geometry, activity rate, rupture characteristics, and relation to the Hosgri fault zone.1 The second objective is to evaluate the ancient (Tertiary) shear zone west of the power block structure for evidence of secondary deformation that may have been associated with the Shoreline fault. The third objective is to estimate potential ground motions from the Shoreline fault, including both independent rupture of the Shoreline fault and possible synchronous rupture with the Hosgri fault.

Action Plan,Section I at 1 (December 17, 2008) (ADAMS Accession No. ML090720505).

With respect to the schedule for implementation of the Action Plan, PG&E stated that it would complete a report on these issues by the fourth quarter of 2010. Id.,Section VII at 6.

PG&E also stated that:

An updated evaluation of the seismic hazard at DCPP will be conducted by PG&E Geosciences as part of the Long Term Seismic Program (LTSP) hazard update, which is scheduled to be completed in 2011. PG&E Geosciences and their consultants will perform the majority of the work; as part of the CRADA, the USGS will perform the balance of their marine magnetic survey and evaluate additional seismicity data in the region.

Id.,Section I at 1.2 In April 2009, the NRC Staff issued RIL-09-0001 for the purpose of describing PG&Es and the Staffs Preliminary Deterministic Analyses of the Shoreline Fault. Id. at 1. The Staff explained that while the NRC is currently using probabilistic methods to license new reactors (id.

at 3, citing 10 C.F.R. § 1000.23), it had used a deterministic approach to evaluate the safety implications of the Shoreline Fault due to the limited and preliminary nature of the required 1

The NRC considers the Hosgri fault to be the controlling fault for the DCPP design. RIL-09-0001 at 2.

2 The NRC Staff noted its approval of the Action Plan in Memorandum to File from Alan Wang re: Diablo Canyon Power Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Review of Potential New Fault at the Diablo Canyon Power Plant Site (November 5, 2009) (ADAMS Accession No. ML093080508).

10

probabilistic input parameters. Id.3 In addition, the Staff noted that a deterministic approach was in keeping with the deterministic design basis for the facility. Id. (citing 10 C.F.R. Part 100, Appendix A).

Although RIL-09-0001 focused on PG&Es and the Staffs preliminary assessment of the Shoreline Fault with regard to the operability of DCPP, the Staff explained that in the future it intended to conduct probabilistic analyses of the information gathered under the CRADA program:

The CRADA program is expected to provide significant new information regarding the larger tectonic picture of the area. The NRC staffs initial assessment was deterministic, consistent with the design basis of the facility. Currently, probabilistic methods are available to more accurately characterize the hazard of the region surrounding the site.

Further, regional moment balancing could also more accurately characterize the regional hazard, both independently and as part of a probabilistic hazard assessment. As more information becomes available (such as the slip rate of the potential Shoreline Fault or any additional information about the Hosgri Fault), the NRC staff expects to evaluate the regional seismic hazard and perform a probabilistic study, when the available data is sufficient.

Id. at 10-11 (emphasis added).

On January 20, 2010, the NRC issued a report summarizing a January 5, 2010, meeting with PG&E regarding the Shoreline Fault. Summary of January 5, 2010, Meeting With Pacific Gas and Electric Company (Meeting Summary) (ADAMS Accession No. ML100130753).

3 RIL-09-0001 is rife with disclaimers about the preliminary nature of the information relied on the Staff for its operability analysis. For example, it:

x refers to PG&Es preliminary assessment that the hazard potential of the Shoreline Fault is bounded by the current review ground motion spectrum for the facility. Id. at 1.

x refers to the initial information provided by PG&E and the USGS. Id.

x states that this work is based on the limited preliminary information currently available to the NRC Staff. Id.

x describes the PG&E-USGS investigation as recently begun. Id. at 2.

x describes its interpretations of data as preliminary. Id.

x States that although the quality of the preliminary data is high and the data sets provide a consistent picture, the picture is also blurry. Id.

11

While both PG&E and the NRC Staff had previously referred to the Shoreline Fault as potential or hypothetical, the Meeting Summary dropped those adjectives and referred to the fault as newly identified. Id. at 1. The NRC Staff reported that the Shoreline fault study had determined that:

1. The microseismicity is a real feature,

2. The Shoreline fault zone has 3 segments,

3. The Shoreline fault is a vertical, strike-slip fault which is consistent with the earlier assumptions, and

4. The Shoreline fault is 300 meters from the intake structure and 600 meters from the power block as compared to the 1,000 meters previously assumed.

Id. at 1. The Staff reported its conclusion that this updated information had not changed its determination that the Hosgri fault is bounding with respect to the safety of operating DCPP.

In addition, the Staff reported that PG&E had performed additional analysis showing that damage due to secondary faulting is very unlikely and the impact on the DCPP seismic core damage frequency is negligible. Id. at 2.

Like the Action Plan, the Meeting Summary reported that under the current schedule, PG&E would complete the Shoreline fault study by the end of 2010. Id. at 2. Reporting on the broader regional study that had commenced in 2007, the Meeting Summary stated that:

The rest of the tectonic modeling for the central California region is due to be complete in 2012. Barbara Bryon (sic) from the California Energy Commission (CEC) asked if three-dimensional imaging studies as recommended by the CEC are going to be performed.

PG&E stated it is looking into the funding for this project, and, if funded, would extend the central California study until 2013.

Id. at 1-2.

PG&Es SAMA analysis acknowledges that both fire and seismic contributors are disproportionately dominant when compared to all external events. Environmental Report at 12

F-65. But nowhere in the SAMA analysis, including twenty pages of description of the Diablo Canyon PRA and its updates (id. at F F-23), does PG&E mention the Shoreline Fault or the Shoreline Fault study.

Elsewhere in the Environmental Report, PG&E does acknowledge the existence of the potential Shoreline Fault (id. at 5-2 and 5 5-5), but it does not discuss its own ongoing study of the fault. Instead, the discussion is limited to descriptions of PG&Es and the Staffs preliminary deterministic analyses in support of their operability determinations (i.e., PG&Es initial evaluation of the potential ground motion levels at DCPP from the hypothesized fault and the NRC Staffs preliminary independent review of possible implications of the potential Shoreline Fault to DCPP using the initial information provided by USGS through PG&E).

Environmental Report at 5-4. PG&E also mentions that PG&E has been collaborating with the USGS to collect and analyze new geological, geophysical, and seismic data to develop improved tectonic models for the central California coastal region through the Collaborative Research and Development Agreement (id. at 5-4) -- but never acknowledges that the collaborative study was accelerated and re-focused on the Shoreline Fault or that PG&E has an NRC-approved Action Plan for completing the study.

b. Discussion NRC regulation 10 C.F.R. § 51.53(c)(3)(ii)(L) requires that PG&E must address alternatives for mitigating severe accidents or SAMAs in its Environmental Report. CEQ regulation 40 C.F.R. § 1502.22 also requires that where information is essential to a reasoned choice among alternatives, the Environmental Report must be based on information that is complete, or its absence must be acknowledged and justified. Only if the overall costs of obtaining information are exorbitant can PG&E omit essential information. Id.

13

PG&Es SAMA analysis is inadequate to satisfy NEPA or its implementing regulations because PG&Es consideration of severe accident mitigation alternatives is based on incomplete information about earthquake risks at Diablo Canyon, and because PG&E fails to acknowledge that it can obtain complete information by simply waiting for the completion of the information.

PG&E appears to believe that it could lawfully rely on its preliminary and deterministic operability analysis to eliminate the Shoreline Fault from any consideration in its SAMA analysis. Setting aside the question of whether PG&Es operability analysis was legally sufficient under the Atomic Energy to ensure the protection of public safety during DCPPs ongoing operation, the NRCs standard for SAMA analyses is quite different: PRA is the accepted and standard practice in SAMA analyses. Entergy Nuclear Generation Company and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station), LBP-06-23, 64 NRC 257, 340 (2006). In addition, the information collected by PG&E to date is concededly preliminary.

Thus, information sufficient to conduct a probabilistic analysis of the risks posed by the Shoreline Fault is essential to the SAMA, and must be included unless the cost is exorbitant.

40 C.F.R. § 1502.22. In this case, the only cost of obtaining the information is the cost of waiting for completion of the Shoreline Fault study - which has been planned by PG&E since 2008.4 PG&E does not address the cost of waiting for completion of those studies in the Environmental Report, and therefore fails to comply with 40 C.F.R. § 1502.22(b).

In any event, no justification can be found for PG&Es decision not to await the information. As discussed above, completion of the Shoreline Fault study is scheduled for the end of 2010, and PG&E plans to update its probabilistic LTSP with that information in 2011.

4 As discussed in the Action Plan, PG&E plans to finish the Shoreline Fault study in 2010 and prepare a probabilistic analysis of the Shoreline Fault in 2011. In RIL-09-0001, the Staff does not provide a date for its own probabilistic analysis, but states that it will do so when the data is sufficient.

14

Tectonic modeling and three-dimensional modeling, is scheduled for completion by 2013. Thus it appears that all of the information needed by PG&E to conduct a probabilistic evaluation of the risk of an earthquake in light of the Shoreline Fault will be available by 2013 at the latest. Given that 2013 is more than ten years before PG&Es licenses are due to expire in 2024 and 2025, PG&E has ample time to conduct a SAMA analysis that is based on complete seismic information.5 Moreover, as the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has recognized, it makes no economic sense to rush through a license renewal proceeding without adequate information on seismic risks. As stated by the President of the CPUC, PG&Es decision not to include a rigorous and up-to-date seismic study in its license renewal application:

does not allow the CPUC to properly undertake its AB 1632 [California Energy Commissions study, An Assessment of Californias Nuclear Power Plants: AB1632 Report] obligations to ensure plant reliability, and in turn to ensure grid reliability, in the event Diablo Canyon has a prolonged or permanent outage.

Letter from CPUC President Michael R. Peevey to PG&E President and CEO Peter A. Darbee (June 25, 2009) (copy attached as Exhibit 2). In other words, as CPUC correctly observes, the cost of going forward with an inadequate SAMA analysis is far greater than the cost of waiting until complete information is available.

3. Demonstration that the Contention is Within the Scope of the Proceeding: This contention is within the scope of this proceeding because it relates to the SAMA analysis required by NRC regulations for the re-licensing of Diablo Canyon.

4. Demonstration that the Contention is Material to the Findings NRC Must Make to Re-License Diablo Canyon: The contention is material to the findings the NRC must make 5

The schedules posted on the NRCs webpage for license renewal show that the NRC has not completed any contested license renewal case that lasted more than four years, and the two pending license renewal cases that have now been completed to the stage of Commission review

- Pilgrim and Vermont Yankee - have not taken more than four years to reach the Commission review stage. See http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html 15

to re-license Diablo Canyon because it demonstrates a deficiency in PG&Es Environmental Report which, if left uncured, will undermine the NRCs ability to adequately evaluate measures to mitigate the adverse impacts of severe accidents at DCNPP.

5. Concise Statement of the Facts or Expert Opinion Supporting the Contention, Along With Appropriate Citations to Supporting Scientific or Factual Materials: This contention is based on facts and opinions stated in documents issued by PG&E, the NRC Staff, and the State of California, which are cited in paragraph 2 above.

Contention EC-2: Failure of SAMA Analysis to Address Environmental Impacts of Spent Fuel Pool Accidents

1. Statement of Contention: PG&Es Environmental Report is inadequate to satisfy NEPA because it does not address the airborne environmental impacts of a reasonably foreseeable spectrum of spent fuel pool accidents, including accidents caused by earthquakes.

2. Brief Summary of Basis for the Contention: In its Environmental Report, PG&E omits any discussion of spent fuel storage impacts because it is a Category 1 issue that was addressed in the 1996 GEIS. Environmental Report at 4-1. Therefore the license renewal GEIS is the appropriate focus of this contention.

In the 1996 License Renewal GEIS, the NRC asserts, with very little discussion, that the environmental impacts of spent fuel storage are small. Id. at 6-83. The 2009 Draft Revised License Renewal GEIS updates the 1996 License Renewal GEIS by addressing additional analyses performed since 1996. Id., § E.3.7, page E E-37. According to the Draft Revised License Renewal GEIS, the key document in this regard is NUREG-1738, Technical Study of Spent Fuel Pool Accident Risk at Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants (October 2000),

which examines a range of accident initiating events. Id. at E E-34. These initiating events 16

include seismic events, cask drop, loss of offsite power, internal fire, loss of pool cooling, loss of pool coolant inventory, accidental aircraft impact, and tornado missile. Id. Relying on NUREG-1738, the Draft Revised License Renewal GEIS concludes that the health-related environmental impacts of a spent fuel pool accident would be comparable to or lower than the impacts of a reactor accident and are bounded by the 1996 GEIS.

Concededly, however, neither the Draft Revised License Renewal GEIS nor NUREG-1738 addresses spent fuel pool accidents outside the eastern and central United States. Id. at E-

33. Moreover, Diablo Canyon is specifically excluded. Id., note 1. As explained in NUREG-1738, western nuclear reactor sites like Diablo Canyon would need to be considered on a site-specific basis because of important differences in seismically induced failure potential of the SFPs [spent fuel pools]. Id. at ix. This conclusion is consistent with PG&Es SAMA analysis for Diablo Canyon, which states that while it is generally reasonable to conclude that the risk of external and internal events are approximately equal, seismic accident risk contributors (along with fire) are disproportionately dominant when compared to all external events. Id. at F-65.

In the Draft Revised License Renewal GEIS, the NRC amends NUREG-1738 by stating that recent and more rigorous accident progression analyses, mitigation enhancements, and NRC site evaluations of every SFP in the United States have led it to conclude that the risk of an SFP zirconium fire initiation is expected to be less than reported in NUREG-1738 . . . and previous studies. Id. at E-36. Given that the risk evaluation in NUREG-1738 does not apply to Diablo Canyon, however, this assertion has no meaningful application to Diablo Canyon. And 17

nothing else in the Draft Revised License Renewal GEIS indicates that the NRC has re-evaluated the conclusions of NUREG-1738 in light of the seismic risks at Diablo Canyon.6 As stated in NUREG-1738, if a spent fuel pool fire occurred at Diablo Canyon, it could result in high consequences in terms of property damage and land contamination. Id. at A6-26.

The effects of a pool fire also include the societal and economic impacts of relocating large numbers of people: indeed, NUREG-1738s conclusion that latent fatalities would be relatively low is based on the presumption that the people in the area of a nuclear plant will be evacuated and relocated after a pool fire. Id. at A4C-4. The economic consequences of a pool fire could be particularly high for California as the highest-earning agricultural state in the union.7 While it may be possible to relocate people, schools and businesses, it is not possible to relocate fertile farmland. These potential consequences are not discussed in the Environmental Report or any other existing EIS for license renewal.

In order to comply with NEPA, the Environmental Report should contain a complete analysis of the potential for a pool fire at Diablo Canyon. The analysis should consider a full spectrum of potential causes, including seismic contributors. As discussed in Contention EC-3, intentional attacks on the fuel pool should also be included in the spectrum of considered events.

6 The Draft Revised License Renewal GEIS does not state that the NRC site evaluations of every SFP in the United States included an evaluation of earthquake risks to the spent fuel storage pools at Diablo Canyon. Indeed, the content of the site evaluation for Diablo Canyon cannot be determined at all because the Draft Revised License Renewal GEIS provides no citation to any site evaluation for Diablo Canyon or any other reactor.

7 See 2007 Census of Agriculture - State Data (http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_2_US_State

_Level/st99_2_002_002.pdf), which shows that 2007 total farm sales in California were over $33 billion, more than 10% of the total farm sales in the entire United States of $297 billion. In the same year, average farm income in California was $418,164, more than three times the national average of $134,807. A copy of the California census data is attached as Exhibit 3.

18

The Environmental Report should also provide a complete analysis of the consequences, including not only health effects but economic and societal effects of widespread land contamination and the need to relocate the population. The Environmental Report should address those impacts, including the health, societal and economic impacts of long-term radiological contamination. In addition, the Environmental Report should address alternatives for avoiding or mitigating those impacts, including the no-action alternative.

3. Demonstration that the Contention is Within the Scope of the Proceeding: This contention is within the scope of the Diablo Canyon license renewal proceeding because it seeks consideration, in the Environmental Report, of information regarding the potentially significant environmental impacts of spent fuel pool accidents that is not considered in the 1996 License Renewal GEIS, that has been identified as new and significant information in the Draft Revised License Renewal GEIS, and that is concededly not generic in nature. Nevertheless, because NRC regulations excuse PG&E from considering the environmental impacts of spent fuel storage in this proceeding, SLOMFP seeks a waiver of those regulations. See attached San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peaces Petition for Waiver of 10 C.F.R. Part 51 Subpart A Appendix B and 10 C.F.R. § 51.53(c)(2) (March 22, 2010) (Waiver Petition).

4. Demonstration that the Contention is Material to the Findings NRC Must Make to Re-License Diablo Canyon: The contention is material to the findings NRC must make regarding the environmental impacts of re-licensing the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant and a reasonable array of alternative measures to avoid or mitigate those impacts, including the no-action alternative. As discussed in the attached Waiver Petition, while the NRC previously made a generic finding about the environmental impacts of spent fuel storage, in this case it is appropriate to make a site-specific finding.

19

5. Concise Statement of the Facts or Expert Opinion Supporting the Contention, Along With Appropriate Citations to Supporting Scientific or Factual Materials: This contention is based on factual information contained in the Environmental Report, NRC documents, and U.S. census data as cited in paragraph 2 above.

Contention EC-3: Failure to Address Environmental Impacts of an Attack on the Diablo Canyon Spent Fuel Pool

1. Statement of contention: The Environmental Report fails to satisfy NEPA because it does not evaluate the environmental impacts of an attack on the Diablo Canyon spent fuel pool during the operating license renewal term.

2. Brief statement of basis for the contention: In the Environmental Report, PG&E does not discuss the environmental impacts of spent fuel storage but instead relies on the 1996 License Renewal GEIS and related regulations. Environmental Report at 4-1. Therefore the GEIS is the appropriate focus of this contention.

As discussed above in Contention EC-2, the Draft Revised GEIS contains significant new information about the risks of spent fuel storage which was not previously considered in the 1996 License Renewal GEIS. While the NRC continues to assert that spent fuel storage impacts are low, it does so based on analyses and mitigation measures that it has never mentioned before.

Mitigation measures relied on by NRC for its conclusion include mitigation enhancements and NRC site evaluations of every SFP in the United States. Id. at E-36. Thus, to some extent, the NRC appears to be relying on site-specific analyses and mitigation measures to reduce the environmental impacts of spent fuel pool attacks. Unfortunately, the NRC does not provide any citations to these references, and thus it is impossible to determine what exactly they consist of.

20

As required by the Commission in Pacific Gas and Electric Company (Diablo Canyon Power Plant Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation), CLI-08-1, 67 NRC 1, 14-16 (2008),

the NRC must provide identifying information for all reference documents on which it relies, including references to both site-specific and generic analyses and mitigation measures; and it should disclose those portions that are releasable. Assuming those documents confirm that the NRC did indeed rely on site-specific measures for its evaluation of the impacts of attacks on the DCNPP spent fuel pool and appropriate mitigation measures, the Commission should also waive its regulations to permit a site-specific evaluation of the environmental impacts of an attack on the Diablo Canyon spent fuel pool.

3. Demonstration that the Contention is Within the Scope of the Proceeding: This contention is within the scope of the Diablo Canyon license renewal proceeding because it seeks consideration, in the Environmental Report, of information regarding the potentially significant environmental impacts of spent fuel pool accidents that is not considered in the 1996 License Renewal GEIS, that has been identified as new and significant information in the Draft Revised License Renewal GEIS, and that is concededly not generic in nature. Nevertheless, because NRC regulations excuse PG&E from considering the environmental impacts of spent fuel storage in this proceeding, SLOMFP seeks a waiver of those regulations. See attached Waiver Petition.

4. Demonstration that the Contention is Material to the Findings NRC Must Make to Re-License Diablo Canyon: The contention is material to the findings NRC must make regarding the environmental impacts of re-licensing the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant and a reasonable array of alternative measures to avoid or mitigate those impacts, including the no-action alternative. As discussed in the attached Waiver Petition, while the NRC previously made 21

a generic finding about the environmental impacts of spent fuel storage, in this case it is appropriate to make a site-specific finding.

5. Concise Statement of the Facts or Expert Opinion Supporting the Contention, Along With Appropriate Citations to Supporting Scientific or Factual Materials: This contention is based on factual information contained in the Environmental Report, the 1996 License Renewal GEIS and the Draft Revised License Renewal GEIS, as discussed and cited in paragraph 2 above.

Contention EC-4: Failure to Address Environmental Impacts of Attack on Diablo Canyon reactor

1. Statement of Contention: The Environmental Report fails to satisfy the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) because it does not discuss the cost-effectiveness of measures to mitigate the environmental impacts of an attack on the Diablo Canyon reactor during the license renewal term.

2. Brief Summary of Basis for the Contention: The NRC has conceded that, for reactors located in the Ninth Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals, it must address the environmental impacts of an attack on any facility it proposes to re-license. Draft GEIS at E E-8 (citing San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. NRC). In its Environmental Report, PG&E relies on an analysis of the impacts of attacks that is presented in the Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) for License Renewal. Environmental Report at 5-5. See also id. at F-

83. According to PG&E, the GEIS is sufficient to address the impacts of a terrorist attack on Diablo Canyon because it concluded that if an attack were to occur, the Commission would expect that the resultant core damage and radiological releases would be no worse than those 22

expected from internally initiated events. Id. (quoting License Renewal GEIS without a page citation).

The discussion in the License Renewal GEIS that is cited by PG&E is completely inadequate to satisfy NEPA, however, because it does not include any analysis of the relative costs and benefits of measures to avoid or mitigate the effects of an attack. A discussion of mitigative measures is required by NEPA and by NRC regulations that require the analysis of severe accident mitigation alternatives (SAMAs) in license renewal decisions. 10 C.F.R. § 51.53(c)(3)(ii)(L). Just as mitigative measures are specific to the types of severe accidents to which a particular reactor design and site are vulnerable, they are also specific to the types of attacks to which the particular reactor design and site are vulnerable.

3. Demonstration that the Contention is Within the Scope of the Proceeding:

The contention is within the scope of the proceeding because (a) the Ninth Circuits decision in San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace established that the impacts of attacks on the Diablo Canyon reactor are cognizable under NEPA, (b) an evaluation of mitigation measures is required by NEPA and NRC regulations, and (c) an evaluation of measures to mitigate attacks on nuclear reactors cannot be found in the License Renewal GEIS.

4. Demonstration that the Contention is Material to the Findings NRC Must Make to Re-License Diablo Canyon: The contention is material to the findings NRC must make in order to re-license Diablo Canyon because it demonstrates the absence of legal and factual analyses that are required by NEPA before the NRC may renew the license.

5. Concise Statement of the Facts or Expert Opinion Supporting the Contention, Along With Appropriate Citations to Supporting Scientific or Factual Materials: This 23

contention relies on factual information presented in the Environmental Report and the Draft Revised License Renewal GEIS, as discussed in paragraph 2 above.

IV. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, SLOMFP should be granted intervenor status and its contentions should be admitted.

Respectfully submitted, Electronically signed by Diane Curran Harmon, Curran, Spielberg, & Eisenberg, L.L.P.

1726 M Street N.W., Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 202/328-3500 e-mail: dcurran@harmoncurran.com March 22, 2010 24

Exhibit 1A UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION In the matter of Pacific Gas and Electric Company Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323 Units Nos. 1 and 2 Renewal of Operating Licenses DECLARATION OF Elizabeth Apfelberg Under penalty of perjury, I, Elizabeth Apfelberg, declare as follows:

1. My name is Elizabeth Apfelberg, I live at 86 Los Palos Drive, San Luis Obispo, California. My home lies within 20 miles of Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant (DCNPP).

2. I am a member of San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace (SLOMFP).

3. I am concerned that the renewed operation of DCNPP will jeopardize the health and safety of myself and my family, and decrease the value of our property. I am also concerned that the operation of DCNPP will have an adverse effect on the health of the environment in which I live.

5. Therefore, I have authorized SLOMFP to request a hearing and intervene on my behalf in the license renewal proceeding for DCNPP.

NAM~~L~

Dated:

Exhibit 1B UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION In the matter of Pacific Gas and Electric Company Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323 Units Nos. 1 and 2 Renewal of Operating Licenses DECLARATION OF ELAINE E. HOLDER Under penalty of perjury, I, Elaine E. Holder, declare as follows:

1. My name is Elaine E. Holder. I live at 274 Cuesta Drive, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405. My home lies within 11 miles of Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant (DCNPP). I also own a house at1166 Nice Ave, Grover Beach, CA 93433, which lies within 11 miles of Diablo Canyon.

2. I am a member of San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace (SLOMFP).

3. I am concerned that the renewed operation of DCNPP will jeopardize my health and safety, and the value of my property. I am also concerned that the operation of DCNPP will have an adverse effect on the health of the environment in which I live.

Because I am 83 and I do not drive, I am also concerned about evacuation plans.

5. Therefore, I have authorized SLOMFP to request a hearing and intervene on my behalf in the license renewal proceeding for DCNPP.

e<

til /} d-e

:...- '~-zA.-..k.:'~.q£-

NAME

Exhibit 1C UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION In the matter of Pacific Gas and Electric Company Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323 Units Nos. 1 and 2 Renewal of Operating Licenses DECLARATION OF Lucy Jane Swanson Under penalty of perjury, I, Lucy Jane Swanson, declare as follows:

1. My name is Lucy Jane Swanson. I live at 475 Squire Canyon Road, San Luis Obispo, California. My home lies within 15 miles of Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant (DCNPP).

2. I am a member of San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace (SLOMFP).

3. I am concerned that the renewed operation of DCNPP will jeopardize the health and safety of myself and my family, and the value of our property. I am also concerned that the operation of DCNPP will have an adverse effect on the health of the environment in which I live.

5. Therefore, I have authorized SLOMFP to request a hearing and to intervene on my behalf in the license renewal proceeding for DCNPP.

-f ."-",,

v<. A

• NAM E -'-'---c NAME 7 ;/

n'"'-~-C7 iIl-.

n

'-!--" c C

~ " ...-~~'-"-~'---

..._/'\..!~'-'t/

. - / '\..!--'-'t/ '-"-~

/

, .1

/1') i' Dated: , I (/ Q .r'./c. j'L

Exhibit 1D UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION In the matter of Pacific Gas and Electric Company Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323 Units Nos. 1 and 2 Renewal of Operating Licenses DECLARATION OF Jill ZamEk Under penalty of perjury, I, Jill ZamEk, declare as follows:

1. My name is Jill ZamEk. I live at 1123 Flora Road, Arroyo Grande, CA. My home lies within 25 miles of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant (DCNPP).

2. I am a member and Board Member of San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace (SLOMFP).

3 . I am concerned that the renewed operation of DCNPP will jeopardize the health and 3.

safety of myself and my family, and the value of our property. I am also concerned that the operation of DCNPP will have an adverse effect on the health of the environment in which I live.

5. Therefore, I have authorized SLOMFP to request a hearing and intervene on my behalf in the license renewal proceeding for DCNPP.

21/1/10 I ,

Date P{ease see CaCifomia f, Notary .ft:c~9Wk4eTll6nt yl!l J",,{ct attaclietf.

Exhibit 2 June 25, 2009 Mr. Peter A. Darbee President & Chief Executive Officer Pacific Gas & Electric Company 1 Market, Spear Tower, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94105

Dear Mr. Darbee:

As required by Assembly Bill (AB) 1632 (Blakeslee), the Energy Commission completed a comprehensive assessment of Diablo Canyon and San Onofre and adopted the study, An Assessment of Californias Nuclear Power Plants: AB1632 Report (AB 1632 Report) as part of its 2008 Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR). This AB 1632 study recommended that the CPUC take certain steps to ensure plant reliability when we review PG&Es license renewal feasibility study for Diablo Canyon. In particular, we need to ensure that we thoroughly evaluate the overall economic and environmental costs and benefits of a license extension for Diablo Canyonespecially in light of the facilitys geographic location vis--vis seismic hazard and vulnerability assessment. As part of this evaluation, PG&E should report on its progress in implementing the AB 1632 Reports recommendation on Diablo Canyon. The CPUC will be looking to the Energy Commissions IEPR for information and input to its license renewal decisions for Diablo Canyon.

It has come to my attention that PG&E does not believe that it should include a seismic study, and other AB 1632 Report recommended studies, as part of its Diablo Canyon license extension studies for the CPUC. Apparently, PG&E bases this position on the fact that the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) license renewal application review process does not require that such a study be included within the scope of a license extension application.

That position, however, does not allow the CPUC to properly undertake its AB 1632 obligations to ensure plant reliability, and in turn to ensure grid reliability, in the event Diablo Canyon has a prolonged or permanent outage. Therefore, the Commission directs PG&E to perform the following tasks as part of its license renewal feasibility studies for Diablo Canyon:

1. Report on the major findings and conclusions from Diablo Canyons seismic/tsunami studies, as recommended in the AB 1632 Report (pp. 6, 7, 10 and 13), as well as studies that are directed by any subsequent legislative mandates,

and report on the implications of these findings and conclusions for the long-term seismic vulnerability and reliability of the plant.

2. Summarize the lessons learned from the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant experience in response to the 2007 earthquake and discuss the implications that an earthquake of the same, or greater, magnitude could have on Diablo Canyon. In particular, the Commission needs PG&E to evaluate whether there are any additional pre-planning or mitigation steps that the utility could take for the power plant that could minimize plant outage times following a major seismic event.

3. Reassess the adequacy of access roads to the Diablo Canyon plant and surrounding roadways for allowing emergency personnel to reach the plants and local communities and plant workers to evacuate. This assessment needs to consider todays local population and not rely on the situation extant when the plant was constructed.

4. Conduct a detailed study of the local economic impacts that would result from a shut-down of the nuclear plant and compare that impact with alternate uses of the Diablo Canyon site.

5. Assess low-level waste disposal costs for waste generated through a 20-year plant license extension, including the low-level waste disposal costs for any major capital projects that might be required during this period. In addition, PG&E should include its plans for storage and disposal of low-level waste and spent fuel through decommissioning of the Diablo Canyon plant as well as the cost associated with the storage and disposal.

6. Study alternative power generation options to quantify the reliability, economic and environmental impacts of replacement power options.

7. Include PG&Es responses to nuclear-related data requests and recommendations in future IEPRs.

PG&Es rate case, D. 07-03-044, specifically linked PG&Es license renewal feasibility study for Diablo Canyon to the AB 1632 assessment and PG&E is obligated to address the above itemized issues in its plant relicensing application. This commission will not be able to adequately and appropriately exercise its authority to fund and oversee Diablo Canyons license extension without these AB 1632 issues being fully developed.

Sincerely, Michael R. Peevey President California Public Utilities Commission

Exhibit 3 Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item United States Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Total sales (see text) .......................................................farms, 2007 2,204,792 48,753 686 15,637 49,346 81,033 2002 2,128,982 45,126 609 7,294 47,483 79,631

$1,000, 2007 297,220,491 4,415,550 57,019 3,234,552 7,508,806 33,885,064 2002 200,646,355 3,264,949 46,143 2,395,447 4,950,397 25,737,173 Average per farm ................................................... dollars, 2007 134,807 90,570 83,119 206,852 152,166 418,164 2002 94,245 72,352 75,768 328,413 104,256 323,205 2007 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) .............................................. farms 688,833 17,042 143 7,266 12,814 18,111

$1,000 84,357 2,040 17 1,103 1,735 2,219

$1,000 to $2,499 ............................................................... farms 211,494 5,540 88 2,366 4,996 5,854

$1,000 350,588 9,198 140 3,682 8,390 9,652

$2,500 to $4,999 ............................................................... farms 200,302 5,458 81 1,721 5,353 6,548

$1,000 718,027 19,369 279 5,975 19,279 23,510

$5,000 to $9,999 ............................................................... farms 218,531 5,702 91 1,377 6,263 7,208

$1,000 1,552,543 40,413 628 9,415 44,563 51,093

$10,000 to $19,999 ........................................................... farms 190,402 5,217 72 862 5,576 7,761

$1,000 2,682,120 72,543 969 11,632 77,750 108,885

$20,000 to $24,999 ........................................................... farms 57,883 1,240 19 201 1,571 2,720

$1,000 1,277,703 27,238 413 4,413 34,598 59,120

$25,000 to $39,999 ........................................................... farms 107,046 1,895 49 307 2,278 5,081

$1,000 3,367,661 58,808 1,505 9,542 70,441 158,823

$40,000 to $49,999 ........................................................... farms 47,686 643 19 126 740 2,497

$1,000 2,112,835 28,145 831 5,531 32,541 108,929

$50,000 to $99,999 ........................................................... farms 125,456 1,287 47 358 1,685 6,212

$1,000 8,961,255 89,616 3,251 25,023 116,773 435,855

$100,000 to $249,999 ....................................................... farms 147,500 1,003 40 298 1,587 6,544

$1,000 24,212,940 164,905 5,901 47,690 267,171 1,026,860

$250,000 to $499,999 ....................................................... farms 93,373 1,386 18 204 1,884 3,917

$1,000 33,409,883 536,916 6,246 74,022 702,517 1,361,005

$500,000 or more ............................................................. farms 116,286 2,340 19 551 4,599 8,580

$1,000 218,490,577 3,366,360 36,839 3,036,525 6,133,048 30,539,114 2002 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) .............................................. farms 570,919 13,298 127 2,538 9,750 16,529

$1,000 63,223 1,680 19 259 1,387 1,872

$1,000 to $2,499 ............................................................... farms 255,639 6,260 80 907 6,658 6,833

$1,000 422,136 10,453 119 1,543 11,104 11,130

$2,500 to $4,999 ............................................................... farms 213,326 6,428 59 647 5,975 6,038

$1,000 762,554 23,068 201 2,308 21,479 21,417

$5,000 to $9,999 ............................................................... farms 223,168 6,083 96 598 6,237 7,262

$1,000 1,577,184 42,770 660 4,248 43,808 50,730

$10,000 to $19,999 ........................................................... farms 197,967 4,203 65 491 5,023 7,169

$1,000 2,781,507 58,176 916 6,752 69,165 101,385

$20,000 to $24,999 ........................................................... farms 58,190 1,003 24 184 1,285 2,286

$1,000 1,285,921 22,113 529 4,029 28,134 50,081

$25,000 to $39,999 ........................................................... farms 109,310 1,425 31 310 1,581 4,957

$1,000 3,438,976 44,272 941 9,810 49,138 155,635

$40,000 to $49,999 ........................................................... farms 48,596 509 22 120 595 2,174

$1,000 2,154,772 22,526 982 5,244 26,226 95,767

$50,000 to $99,999 ........................................................... farms 140,479 1,246 34 307 1,865 6,798

$1,000 10,024,295 86,863 2,282 22,066 135,583 478,765

$100,000 to $249,999 ....................................................... farms 159,052 1,280 33 320 2,655 7,281

$1,000 25,401,608 212,895 5,210 49,562 447,409 1,146,367

$250,000 to $499,999 ....................................................... farms 81,694 1,441 23 232 3,120 4,145

$1,000 28,530,105 529,623 8,308 82,714 1,177,094 1,455,208

$500,000 or more ............................................................. farms 70,642 1,950 15 640 2,739 8,159

$1,000 124,204,073 2,210,510 25,977 2,206,913 2,939,871 22,168,817 Value of sales by commodity or commodity group:

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse ...............farms, 2007 986,080 13,681 384 4,513 15,966 48,901 2002 944,656 11,059 337 2,576 12,995 48,634

$1,000, 2007 143,657,928 676,987 24,749 1,913,014 2,900,973 22,903,021 2002 95,151,954 590,268 20,543 1,587,775 1,620,384 19,152,722 Grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas .............................................................farms, 2007 479,467 2,359 21 434 5,220 4,261 2002 485,124 2,195 23 485 5,971 4,952

$1,000, 2007 77,215,262 120,656 587 117,494 2,252,907 1,105,369 2002 39,957,698 62,949 (D) 80,408 1,122,883 722,093 Corn .................................................................farms, 2007 347,540 1,856 - 156 1,411 1,811 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 39,909,600 74,138 - 40,187 356,930 309,402 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Wheat ..............................................................farms, 2007 159,527 518 - 200 2,112 1,188 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 10,623,640 13,680 - 46,107 118,354 155,566 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Soybeans .........................................................farms, 2007 285,089 924 - - 4,711 15 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 20,283,986 29,511 - - 769,976 326 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Sorghum ..........................................................farms, 2007 27,142 88 - 130 707 150 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 1,651,798 801 - 15,167 73,348 7,909 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Barley ..............................................................farms, 2007 18,326 - 19 113 - 160 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 701,047 - 497 11,115 - 11,146 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Rice .................................................................farms, 2007 6,085 - - - 2,752 1,305 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 2,020,231 - - - 932,782 501,046 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Other grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas .........................................................farms, 2007 55,228 275 5 72 62 967 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 2,024,959 2,526 90 4,917 1,516 119,976 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 294 UNITED STATES 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Total sales (see text) ....................................................... farms, 2007 37,054 4,916 2,546 47,463 47,846 7,521 2002 31,369 4,191 2,391 44,081 49,311 5,398

$1,000, 2007 6,061,134 551,553 1,083,035 7,785,228 7,112,866 513,626 2002 4,525,196 470,637 618,853 6,242,272 4,911,752 533,423 Average per farm .................................................. dollars, 2007 163,576 112,195 425,387 164,027 148,662 68,292 2002 144,257 112,297 258,826 141,609 99,608 98,819 2007 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) ............................................... farms 14,235 1,307 433 16,150 18,405 1,646

$1,000 1,457 246 66 1,999 2,033 299

$1,000 to $2,499 ............................................................... farms 3,331 626 250 5,379 4,986 1,286

$1,000 5,382 1,038 406 8,840 8,228 2,032

$2,500 to $4,999 ............................................................... farms 3,002 719 201 4,839 4,450 1,012

$1,000 10,597 2,453 709 17,331 16,014 3,588

$5,000 to $9,999 ............................................................... farms 3,122 561 159 4,668 4,527 996

$1,000 21,896 3,886 1,154 32,863 31,999 7,048

$10,000 to $19,999 ........................................................... farms 2,749 499 216 4,093 3,860 939

$1,000 38,794 6,959 2,997 57,225 53,584 12,962

$20,000 to $24,999 ........................................................... farms 851 153 56 1,311 1,046 204

$1,000 18,768 3,383 1,233 28,538 23,011 4,418

$25,000 to $39,999 ........................................................... farms 1,628 228 100 2,301 1,651 401

$1,000 51,246 7,026 2,968 71,667 51,361 12,480

$40,000 to $49,999 ........................................................... farms 755 101 27 1,054 657 156

$1,000 33,349 4,424 1,209 45,631 29,145 6,716

$50,000 to $99,999 ........................................................... farms 2,283 231 115 2,435 1,491 353

$1,000 162,360 16,111 8,056 170,114 103,044 24,332

$100,000 to $249,999 ....................................................... farms 2,348 222 140 2,103 2,182 274

$1,000 378,950 35,505 23,150 331,134 378,793 40,897

$250,000 to $499,999 ....................................................... farms 1,247 91 141 1,063 1,232 106

$1,000 450,488 31,071 52,303 373,432 459,611 37,691

$500,000 or more .............................................................. farms 1,503 178 708 2,067 3,359 148

$1,000 4,887,846 439,451 988,785 6,646,454 5,956,045 361,164 2002 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) ............................................... farms 9,429 1,312 324 12,027 17,108 661

$1,000 777 177 66 1,564 1,671 165

$1,000 to $2,499 ............................................................... farms 3,587 588 283 7,087 6,878 746

$1,000 5,813 949 475 11,404 11,370 1,207

$2,500 to $4,999 ............................................................... farms 2,979 523 141 4,544 5,046 714

$1,000 10,545 1,797 479 16,093 17,996 2,549

$5,000 to $9,999 ............................................................... farms 2,967 398 133 4,285 5,131 916

$1,000 20,955 2,751 876 30,120 36,111 6,366

$10,000 to $19,999 ........................................................... farms 2,882 379 120 3,910 3,881 807

$1,000 40,344 5,294 1,688 55,050 54,211 11,035

$20,000 to $24,999 ........................................................... farms 896 123 39 1,330 997 249

$1,000 19,647 2,713 865 29,469 22,063 5,346

$25,000 to $39,999 ........................................................... farms 1,725 170 93 2,227 1,702 341

$1,000 54,476 5,252 2,914 70,153 53,332 10,519

$40,000 to $49,999 ........................................................... farms 795 71 54 1,078 704 165

$1,000 35,098 3,092 2,365 47,857 30,950 7,109

$50,000 to $99,999 ........................................................... farms 2,179 188 180 2,486 1,592 314

$1,000 154,391 13,160 12,581 175,907 112,269 20,907

$100,000 to $249,999 ....................................................... farms 2,064 195 195 2,092 1,804 249

$1,000 322,541 32,391 31,975 328,219 297,953 37,734

$250,000 to $499,999 ....................................................... farms 867 114 499 1,147 1,997 103

$1,000 299,380 37,906 196,263 395,446 734,621 36,198

$500,000 or more .............................................................. farms 999 130 330 1,868 2,471 133

$1,000 3,561,229 365,155 368,306 5,080,991 3,539,204 394,287 Value of sales by commodity or commodity group:

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse ............... farms, 2007 13,897 2,937 1,517 17,307 15,305 5,376 2002 10,613 2,376 1,366 17,327 14,837 4,317

$1,000, 2007 1,981,399 401,372 210,635 6,256,228 2,142,270 429,916 2002 1,216,278 327,527 150,404 5,041,433 1,579,596 445,356 Grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas ............................................................ farms, 2007 5,304 157 1,098 730 4,422 15 2002 4,829 116 1,014 509 3,828 13

$1,000, 2007 1,049,754 2,316 117,073 33,344 300,754 19,353 2002 448,378 1,410 72,393 17,798 102,464 14,647 Corn ................................................................ farms, 2007 2,926 142 855 555 3,190 15 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 487,703 2,182 67,837 17,583 178,260 19,353 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Wheat .............................................................. farms, 2007 3,649 3 339 79 1,318 -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 435,716 (D) 14,661 2,988 45,390 -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Soybeans ........................................................ farms, 2007 67 7 830 117 1,653 -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 3,261 (D) 31,079 2,349 61,703 -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Sorghum .......................................................... farms, 2007 418 1 10 37 448 -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 21,707 (D) (D) 671 6,569 -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Barley .............................................................. farms, 2007 326 - 137 - 11 -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 24,066 - 3,319 - 80 -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Rice ................................................................. farms, 2007 - - - 7 - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 - - - 8,332 - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Other grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas ........................................................ farms, 2007 1,248 18 23 141 914 -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 77,301 29 (D) 1,421 8,751 -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA UNITED STATES 295 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Total sales (see text) .......................................................farms, 2007 25,349 76,860 60,938 92,856 65,531 85,260 2002 25,017 73,027 60,296 90,655 64,414 86,541

$1,000, 2007 5,688,765 13,329,107 8,271,291 20,418,096 14,413,182 4,824,561 2002 3,908,262 7,676,239 4,783,158 12,273,634 8,746,244 3,080,080 Average per farm ................................................... dollars, 2007 224,418 173,421 135,733 219,890 219,944 56,586 2002 156,224 105,115 79,328 135,388 135,782 35,591 2007 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) .............................................. farms 8,089 22,411 17,258 23,698 18,554 25,918

$1,000 958 2,051 2,300 1,292 1,578 3,805

$1,000 to $2,499 ............................................................... farms 2,683 4,468 5,212 3,032 4,177 9,882

$1,000 4,467 7,486 8,760 5,079 6,871 16,482

$2,500 to $4,999 ............................................................... farms 2,192 4,278 4,971 3,986 3,863 9,787

$1,000 7,870 15,496 17,878 14,496 14,020 35,359

$5,000 to $9,999 ............................................................... farms 2,281 4,877 5,686 5,100 5,198 11,150

$1,000 16,259 34,909 40,403 37,069 37,249 79,547

$10,000 to $19,999 ........................................................... farms 1,938 4,316 4,842 4,715 5,845 9,752

$1,000 27,249 61,816 68,895 68,106 83,766 137,218

$20,000 to $24,999 ........................................................... farms 679 1,594 1,483 1,948 1,999 2,890

$1,000 14,979 35,448 33,033 43,388 44,260 63,772

$25,000 to $39,999 ........................................................... farms 1,166 3,484 3,120 4,670 4,195 4,626

$1,000 36,612 110,770 99,362 149,361 132,914 144,188

$40,000 to $49,999 ........................................................... farms 500 1,897 1,411 2,844 1,902 1,670

$1,000 22,142 84,608 62,858 127,565 84,762 73,819

$50,000 to $99,999 ........................................................... farms 1,505 6,245 4,273 9,805 5,609 3,663

$1,000 106,929 456,299 307,348 723,244 400,420 256,024

$100,000 to $249,999 ....................................................... farms 1,630 9,029 5,283 14,181 6,423 2,892

$1,000 266,828 1,504,558 875,041 2,396,707 1,043,707 458,770

$250,000 to $499,999 ....................................................... farms 1,031 7,101 3,372 9,399 3,751 1,417

$1,000 366,846 2,569,946 1,206,047 3,372,226 1,343,309 498,767

$500,000 or more ............................................................. farms 1,655 7,160 4,027 9,478 4,015 1,613

$1,000 4,817,628 8,445,720 5,549,365 13,479,563 11,220,326 3,056,810 2002 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) .............................................. farms 8,351 16,559 15,523 19,668 16,466 18,452

$1,000 552 1,328 1,516 915 1,300 2,819

$1,000 to $2,499 ............................................................... farms 3,236 4,242 6,097 3,768 3,978 14,466

$1,000 5,345 7,088 10,072 6,246 6,623 24,263

$2,500 to $4,999 ............................................................... farms 2,123 4,316 5,169 3,737 4,594 11,778

$1,000 7,453 15,621 18,587 13,593 16,686 42,440

$5,000 to $9,999 ............................................................... farms 1,998 5,146 5,760 4,902 6,102 13,561

$1,000 14,353 36,776 41,002 35,352 43,855 95,820

$10,000 to $19,999 ........................................................... farms 1,897 5,866 5,555 6,631 6,936 10,659

$1,000 26,483 84,771 79,007 96,195 99,523 148,506

$20,000 to $24,999 ........................................................... farms 547 2,114 1,774 2,778 2,320 2,495

$1,000 12,058 46,948 39,366 61,731 51,604 55,155

$25,000 to $39,999 ........................................................... farms 1,137 4,767 3,438 6,437 4,621 4,832

$1,000 35,629 151,807 108,843 205,720 146,204 150,233

$40,000 to $49,999 ........................................................... farms 467 2,491 1,674 3,601 2,096 1,693

$1,000 20,586 110,695 74,501 160,367 93,441 75,155

$50,000 to $99,999 ........................................................... farms 1,368 8,052 4,945 11,718 6,282 3,486

$1,000 97,522 581,380 353,319 846,783 448,705 242,915

$100,000 to $249,999 ....................................................... farms 1,679 10,911 5,646 14,920 6,521 2,915

$1,000 269,113 1,773,481 907,375 2,417,878 1,033,957 444,138

$250,000 to $499,999 ....................................................... farms 910 5,718 2,859 7,731 2,684 1,250

$1,000 319,331 1,978,684 1,001,820 2,679,591 923,282 433,969

$500,000 or more ............................................................. farms 1,304 2,845 1,856 4,764 1,814 954

$1,000 3,099,838 2,887,662 2,147,748 5,749,264 5,881,064 1,364,666 Value of sales by commodity or commodity group:

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse ...............farms, 2007 10,688 49,658 36,142 59,196 36,158 35,077 2002 9,261 50,786 35,457 60,303 36,152 46,370

$1,000, 2007 2,324,789 10,876,415 5,319,019 10,343,585 4,887,212 1,404,769 2002 1,787,172 5,871,542 2,992,747 6,071,272 2,418,447 1,110,209 Grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas .............................................................farms, 2007 4,649 42,901 29,038 53,417 28,543 8,729 2002 4,500 45,989 28,463 55,294 30,326 8,326

$1,000, 2007 806,299 10,257,765 5,021,216 10,123,033 4,510,045 867,298 2002 479,728 5,335,107 2,646,983 5,858,528 2,102,432 518,327 Corn .................................................................farms, 2007 1,361 38,668 24,597 49,970 11,839 7,107 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 132,097 7,073,343 3,114,306 6,796,492 1,697,262 553,127 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Wheat ..............................................................farms, 2007 2,839 9,395 5,033 570 22,430 1,406 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 458,767 229,850 99,664 5,859 1,403,043 58,632 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Soybeans .........................................................farms, 2007 - 34,682 22,569 42,597 13,987 4,447 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 - 2,914,745 1,772,861 3,306,656 688,080 249,237 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Sorghum ..........................................................farms, 2007 - 736 88 50 11,419 107 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 - 21,872 3,302 697 673,559 3,825 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Barley ..............................................................farms, 2007 2,121 40 32 72 152 47 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 151,675 (D) 48 398 1,675 239 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Rice .................................................................farms, 2007 - 3 - - - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 - (D) - - - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Other grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas .........................................................farms, 2007 1,156 1,043 704 2,558 1,616 113 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 63,760 16,849 31,036 12,930 46,426 2,239 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 296 UNITED STATES 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Total sales (see text) ....................................................... farms, 2007 30,106 8,136 12,834 7,691 56,014 80,992 2002 27,413 7,196 12,198 6,075 53,315 80,839

$1,000, 2007 2,617,981 617,190 1,835,090 489,820 5,753,219 13,180,466 2002 1,815,803 463,603 1,293,303 384,314 3,772,435 8,575,627 Average per farm .................................................. dollars, 2007 86,959 75,859 142,987 63,687 102,710 162,738 2002 66,239 64,425 106,026 63,262 70,757 106,083 2007 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) ............................................... farms 11,583 2,866 3,745 2,380 18,648 26,286

$1,000 1,135 493 451 438 2,372 2,275

$1,000 to $2,499 ............................................................... farms 3,043 1,058 1,240 949 5,502 4,392

$1,000 5,018 1,752 2,062 1,546 9,234 7,350

$2,500 to $4,999 ............................................................... farms 2,934 838 1,248 839 5,229 4,451

$1,000 10,400 2,991 4,522 3,022 18,659 16,031

$5,000 to $9,999 ............................................................... farms 3,295 846 1,272 769 5,292 4,795

$1,000 23,228 5,944 8,991 5,329 37,544 34,430

$10,000 to $19,999 ........................................................... farms 2,448 747 1,112 791 4,715 4,926

$1,000 34,099 10,538 15,590 10,979 66,930 70,768

$20,000 to $24,999 ........................................................... farms 719 202 357 244 1,379 1,751

$1,000 15,792 4,410 7,865 5,299 30,734 38,828

$25,000 to $39,999 ........................................................... farms 1,288 328 629 362 2,791 3,819

$1,000 40,064 10,213 19,730 11,523 88,022 122,318

$40,000 to $49,999 ........................................................... farms 483 151 281 156 1,150 1,918

$1,000 21,304 6,737 12,462 6,865 51,181 85,686

$50,000 to $99,999 ........................................................... farms 1,091 328 691 398 3,342 6,490

$1,000 75,816 22,723 49,466 27,591 235,867 470,986

$100,000 to $249,999 ....................................................... farms 1,030 377 734 397 3,492 9,479

$1,000 174,107 59,785 118,385 60,648 549,825 1,566,188

$250,000 to $499,999 ....................................................... farms 787 197 555 212 2,054 6,259

$1,000 294,521 67,611 201,269 73,831 732,045 2,228,906

$500,000 or more .............................................................. farms 1,405 198 970 194 2,420 6,426

$1,000 1,922,496 423,992 1,394,298 282,750 3,930,806 8,536,699 2002 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) ............................................... farms 7,948 2,659 3,633 1,727 17,442 23,766

$1,000 971 422 428 289 1,558 1,649

$1,000 to $2,499 ............................................................... farms 3,890 975 1,483 865 5,849 5,258

$1,000 6,376 1,589 2,412 1,376 9,665 8,662

$2,500 to $4,999 ............................................................... farms 3,203 777 1,199 647 4,749 4,417

$1,000 11,391 2,736 4,286 2,243 17,092 16,010

$5,000 to $9,999 ............................................................... farms 3,194 682 1,067 623 5,107 5,491

$1,000 22,192 4,783 7,500 4,281 36,516 39,423

$10,000 to $19,999 ........................................................... farms 2,435 578 1,006 555 4,930 5,994

$1,000 33,615 8,051 14,179 7,728 70,100 85,952

$20,000 to $24,999 ........................................................... farms 604 149 313 160 1,499 2,105

$1,000 13,336 3,292 6,914 3,491 33,184 46,663

$25,000 to $39,999 ........................................................... farms 970 269 531 279 2,839 4,813

$1,000 30,362 8,353 16,467 8,821 89,520 153,426

$40,000 to $49,999 ........................................................... farms 449 118 197 143 1,180 2,429

$1,000 19,826 5,231 8,685 6,277 52,353 108,292

$50,000 to $99,999 ........................................................... farms 1,295 310 670 385 3,229 8,024

$1,000 90,766 22,145 48,317 26,885 228,371 579,548

$100,000 to $249,999 ....................................................... farms 1,529 350 814 380 3,231 9,895

$1,000 245,071 56,012 134,476 58,644 513,700 1,597,222

$250,000 to $499,999 ....................................................... farms 944 163 630 176 1,807 5,022

$1,000 331,184 55,647 223,996 58,991 625,875 1,734,453

$500,000 or more .............................................................. farms 952 166 655 135 1,453 3,625

$1,000 1,010,714 295,343 825,642 205,289 2,094,500 4,204,328 Value of sales by commodity or commodity group:

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse ............... farms, 2007 8,241 4,427 6,763 4,162 32,167 46,189 2002 8,370 3,825 6,252 3,629 29,697 45,614

$1,000, 2007 1,604,647 326,573 629,303 364,481 3,329,928 7,048,913 2002 1,065,611 222,356 450,202 277,069 2,362,628 4,562,882 Grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas ............................................................ farms, 2007 3,097 254 3,501 126 17,140 36,298 2002 3,655 308 3,510 110 16,819 36,628

$1,000, 2007 850,540 9,146 307,944 1,781 1,710,733 5,936,153 2002 368,691 7,794 167,555 1,358 990,921 3,551,017 Corn ................................................................ farms, 2007 1,386 62 2,758 117 13,472 30,207 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 337,958 2,574 170,038 1,737 915,597 3,316,564 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Wheat .............................................................. farms, 2007 809 8 1,486 5 6,235 6,699 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 42,975 148 46,832 (D) 159,397 451,147 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Soybeans ........................................................ farms, 2007 1,518 12 2,165 3 10,749 27,407 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 181,781 (D) 84,062 (D) 540,606 2,017,731 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Sorghum .......................................................... farms, 2007 621 - 80 - 68 5 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 61,212 - 734 - 157 6 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Barley .............................................................. farms, 2007 - 66 638 - 320 1,038 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 - (D) 5,430 - 1,778 18,393 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Rice ................................................................. farms, 2007 848 - - - - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 226,279 - - - - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Other grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas ........................................................ farms, 2007 52 161 225 6 3,136 5,635 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 335 3,811 848 (D) 93,198 132,312 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA UNITED STATES 297 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire Total sales (see text) .......................................................farms, 2007 41,959 107,825 29,524 47,712 3,131 4,166 2002 42,186 106,797 27,870 49,355 2,989 3,363

$1,000, 2007 4,876,781 7,512,926 2,803,062 15,506,035 513,269 199,051 2002 3,116,295 4,983,255 1,882,114 9,703,657 446,989 144,835 Average per farm ................................................... dollars, 2007 116,227 69,677 94,942 324,992 163,931 47,780 2002 73,870 46,661 67,532 196,609 149,545 43,067 2007 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) .............................................. farms 18,389 30,541 9,986 9,086 878 1,434

$1,000 1,447 3,392 715 754 106 246

$1,000 to $2,499 ............................................................... farms 3,816 8,938 1,991 1,956 306 634

$1,000 6,307 15,075 3,327 3,233 507 1,048

$2,500 to $4,999 ............................................................... farms 3,659 10,172 1,784 1,792 269 466

$1,000 13,107 36,799 6,393 6,494 941 1,686

$5,000 to $9,999 ............................................................... farms 4,029 12,872 1,934 2,186 333 469

$1,000 28,572 92,203 13,790 15,794 2,329 3,258

$10,000 to $19,999 ........................................................... farms 3,630 12,377 2,070 2,819 262 362

$1,000 50,987 175,934 29,483 40,942 3,788 5,030

$20,000 to $24,999 ........................................................... farms 890 3,884 700 1,059 72 104

$1,000 19,597 85,945 15,502 23,477 1,585 2,246

$25,000 to $39,999 ........................................................... farms 1,361 7,346 1,458 2,568 154 195

$1,000 42,187 230,505 45,919 82,100 4,779 6,153

$40,000 to $49,999 ........................................................... farms 569 3,217 757 1,409 63 68

$1,000 25,155 142,415 33,612 62,519 2,767 2,992

$50,000 to $99,999 ........................................................... farms 1,070 6,634 2,464 5,261 179 148

$1,000 74,371 473,382 176,539 384,139 12,856 10,230

$100,000 to $249,999 ....................................................... farms 1,049 5,688 3,440 7,947 255 136

$1,000 171,387 931,139 563,632 1,314,877 41,570 20,713

$250,000 to $499,999 ....................................................... farms 852 2,959 1,807 5,708 157 85

$1,000 315,923 1,072,242 633,257 2,052,520 53,671 29,596

$500,000 or more ............................................................. farms 2,645 3,197 1,133 5,921 203 65

$1,000 4,127,741 4,253,896 1,280,893 11,519,186 388,370 115,854 2002 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) .............................................. farms 16,445 23,617 7,968 8,002 758 1,250

$1,000 1,331 2,719 499 502 79 187

$1,000 to $2,499 ............................................................... farms 6,001 12,492 2,149 1,818 350 507

$1,000 9,964 20,924 3,565 3,028 569 822

$2,500 to $4,999 ............................................................... farms 4,572 11,663 1,776 2,172 256 382

$1,000 16,267 42,110 6,327 7,889 921 1,327

$5,000 to $9,999 ............................................................... farms 4,260 15,249 2,162 3,077 291 344

$1,000 29,853 108,657 15,484 22,370 1,998 2,394

$10,000 to $19,999 ........................................................... farms 3,130 14,053 2,271 4,220 238 247

$1,000 43,316 197,248 32,405 60,740 3,350 3,434

$20,000 to $24,999 ........................................................... farms 762 4,034 772 1,633 74 56

$1,000 16,716 89,156 17,111 36,352 1,623 1,223

$25,000 to $39,999 ........................................................... farms 1,155 6,682 1,780 4,083 149 136

$1,000 36,173 209,274 56,409 129,416 4,676 4,090

$40,000 to $49,999 ........................................................... farms 433 2,660 938 1,947 65 58

$1,000 19,158 117,894 41,508 86,639 2,799 2,540

$50,000 to $99,999 ........................................................... farms 1,071 6,931 3,027 6,619 227 130

$1,000 75,649 487,292 215,811 477,834 16,309 9,255

$100,000 to $249,999 ....................................................... farms 1,206 5,271 3,399 8,834 276 130

$1,000 197,863 844,286 526,723 1,411,344 43,170 20,320

$250,000 to $499,999 ....................................................... farms 1,269 2,513 1,108 4,126 145 75

$1,000 465,843 869,753 373,328 1,421,255 50,710 25,996

$500,000 or more ............................................................. farms 1,882 1,632 520 2,824 160 48

$1,000 2,204,162 1,993,941 592,944 6,046,287 320,784 73,246 Value of sales by commodity or commodity group:

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse ...............farms, 2007 10,712 44,864 12,102 31,099 1,051 2,259 2002 9,724 42,853 11,439 31,493 968 1,730

$1,000, 2007 1,668,028 3,494,938 1,273,721 6,843,325 219,341 106,467 2002 1,025,385 1,992,446 733,324 3,388,265 157,730 83,149 Grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas .............................................................farms, 2007 3,918 22,731 6,386 26,753 76 60 2002 3,884 24,793 6,517 28,070 97 47

$1,000, 2007 1,089,873 2,963,208 1,009,039 6,528,508 8,455 838 2002 457,364 1,546,535 507,090 3,091,884 (D) 1,246 Corn .................................................................farms, 2007 2,113 15,663 461 23,236 31 55 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 430,983 1,365,543 28,168 4,427,937 2,392 837 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Wheat ..............................................................farms, 2007 1,003 7,612 5,428 8,012 38 1 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 85,569 171,548 816,021 407,325 5,678 (D) 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Soybeans .........................................................farms, 2007 2,695 19,048 8 17,192 - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 405,236 1,272,702 (D) 1,487,283 - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Sorghum ..........................................................farms, 2007 305 1,098 2 1,994 1 -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 32,893 33,141 (D) 74,590 (D) -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Barley ..............................................................farms, 2007 - 54 2,307 35 6 -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 - 163 102,202 194 283 -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Rice .................................................................farms, 2007 341 435 - - - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 134,617 115,434 - - - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Other grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas .........................................................farms, 2007 72 443 1,240 2,274 3 4 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 574 4,675 62,527 131,180 (D) (D) 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 298 UNITED STATES 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Total sales (see text) ....................................................... farms, 2007 10,327 20,930 36,352 52,913 31,970 75,861 2002 9,924 15,170 37,255 53,930 30,619 77,797

$1,000, 2007 986,885 2,175,080 4,418,634 10,313,628 6,084,218 7,070,212 2002 749,872 1,700,030 3,117,834 6,961,686 3,233,366 4,263,549 Average per farm .................................................. dollars, 2007 95,564 103,922 121,551 194,917 190,310 93,200 2002 75,561 112,065 83,689 129,087 105,600 54,804 2007 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) ............................................... farms 3,194 7,613 9,847 15,855 10,650 20,019

$1,000 1,071 976 1,394 2,484 397 2,940

$1,000 to $2,499 ............................................................... farms 1,754 2,883 3,157 6,753 736 7,537

$1,000 2,766 4,669 5,178 11,000 1,241 12,511

$2,500 to $4,999 ............................................................... farms 999 2,520 3,075 5,863 868 7,357

$1,000 3,522 8,934 11,042 20,983 3,131 26,333

$5,000 to $9,999 ............................................................... farms 1,007 2,252 3,770 5,805 1,215 7,793

$1,000 7,011 15,518 26,785 41,134 8,884 55,802

$10,000 to $19,999 ........................................................... farms 806 1,650 3,674 4,704 1,428 6,827

$1,000 11,271 22,945 51,093 64,868 20,723 97,442

$20,000 to $24,999 ........................................................... farms 302 414 1,032 1,124 539 2,218

$1,000 6,573 9,124 22,778 24,723 12,005 49,279

$25,000 to $39,999 ........................................................... farms 468 753 1,883 1,956 1,361 4,478

$1,000 14,747 23,397 59,246 61,285 43,335 142,141

$40,000 to $49,999 ........................................................... farms 188 312 811 809 802 2,023

$1,000 8,280 13,830 35,982 35,730 35,518 90,602

$50,000 to $99,999 ........................................................... farms 462 844 2,253 1,718 2,891 5,565

$1,000 31,849 60,242 161,929 121,445 211,633 402,232

$100,000 to $249,999 ....................................................... farms 461 759 3,295 1,854 4,303 5,720

$1,000 72,630 120,633 544,576 309,261 721,316 927,974

$250,000 to $499,999 ....................................................... farms 286 376 1,805 1,866 3,552 3,237

$1,000 99,373 132,249 630,352 688,110 1,269,432 1,153,405

$500,000 or more .............................................................. farms 400 554 1,750 4,606 3,625 3,087

$1,000 727,792 1,762,563 2,868,278 8,932,607 3,756,602 4,109,551 2002 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) ............................................... farms 2,927 5,519 9,825 13,520 8,634 18,939

$1,000 937 429 1,101 1,841 250 2,474

$1,000 to $2,499 ............................................................... farms 2,306 1,993 4,418 8,576 677 9,979

$1,000 3,596 3,251 7,245 14,088 1,151 16,517

$2,500 to $4,999 ............................................................... farms 991 1,408 3,364 6,350 1,004 9,022

$1,000 3,432 4,981 12,045 22,575 3,690 32,110

$5,000 to $9,999 ............................................................... farms 820 1,443 3,223 5,925 1,471 8,718

$1,000 5,604 10,168 22,764 41,283 10,702 61,886

$10,000 to $19,999 ........................................................... farms 692 1,208 3,278 4,585 2,165 8,161

$1,000 9,562 16,848 45,447 63,873 31,196 115,285

$20,000 to $24,999 ........................................................... farms 259 378 898 1,273 915 2,482

$1,000 5,664 8,258 19,765 28,108 20,292 55,021

$25,000 to $39,999 ........................................................... farms 347 623 1,880 1,848 1,965 4,431

$1,000 10,858 19,442 59,326 57,476 62,353 139,281

$40,000 to $49,999 ........................................................... farms 142 270 845 854 1,108 1,900

$1,000 6,185 11,878 37,496 37,749 49,187 84,619

$50,000 to $99,999 ........................................................... farms 381 740 3,073 2,208 3,851 5,297

$1,000 26,794 51,971 225,097 158,105 277,864 373,061

$100,000 to $249,999 ....................................................... farms 463 773 3,878 2,630 5,221 5,384

$1,000 72,918 123,777 616,540 439,924 831,944 845,567

$250,000 to $499,999 ....................................................... farms 256 349 1,491 2,579 2,381 2,288

$1,000 88,966 123,763 504,859 931,601 816,893 780,893

$500,000 or more .............................................................. farms 340 466 1,082 3,582 1,227 1,196

$1,000 515,357 1,325,264 1,566,149 5,165,062 1,127,844 1,756,836 Value of sales by commodity or commodity group:

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse ............... farms, 2007 6,505 7,441 20,009 23,575 18,127 45,060 2002 6,199 4,739 18,743 24,587 16,938 45,454

$1,000, 2007 851,653 553,140 1,561,927 2,606,279 5,038,521 4,109,722 2002 657,494 397,257 1,135,129 2,008,634 2,460,372 2,304,895 Grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas ............................................................ farms, 2007 1,120 1,054 5,249 9,803 15,377 30,658 2002 1,083 742 4,786 9,513 15,015 30,873

$1,000, 2007 59,860 132,548 315,647 697,792 4,567,800 3,361,418 2002 29,885 68,256 156,300 359,296 2,083,788 1,541,122 Corn ................................................................ farms, 2007 797 398 4,332 6,476 6,401 24,006 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 32,981 70,667 210,169 347,995 821,072 1,643,456 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Wheat .............................................................. farms, 2007 317 525 1,039 3,179 12,282 11,426 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 6,656 43,005 28,470 96,691 1,845,619 204,871 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Soybeans ........................................................ farms, 2007 533 4 1,239 7,080 5,994 24,360 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 19,279 108 61,789 246,716 780,507 1,495,598 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Sorghum .......................................................... farms, 2007 16 260 45 233 12 50 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 118 12,546 122 1,495 44 909 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Barley .............................................................. farms, 2007 46 9 301 222 4,839 190 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 416 303 1,118 2,273 254,809 482 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Rice ................................................................. farms, 2007 - - - - - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 - - - - - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Other grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas ........................................................ farms, 2007 116 179 1,583 791 8,719 2,397 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 410 5,920 13,979 2,621 865,748 16,103 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA UNITED STATES 299 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Total sales (see text) .......................................................farms, 2007 86,565 38,553 63,163 1,219 25,867 2002 83,300 40,033 58,105 858 24,541

$1,000, 2007 5,806,061 4,386,143 5,808,803 65,908 2,352,681 2002 4,456,404 3,195,497 4,256,959 55,546 1,489,750 Average per farm ................................................... dollars, 2007 67,072 113,769 91,965 54,067 90,953 2002 53,498 79,822 73,263 64,740 60,705 2007 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) ...............................................farms 26,638 11,763 21,425 361 11,291

$1,000 3,400 2,196 3,032 54 1,177

$1,000 to $2,499 ................................................................farms 8,031 5,687 6,070 126 3,045

$1,000 13,365 9,327 10,163 202 5,041

$2,500 to $4,999 ................................................................farms 9,059 4,651 5,609 140 2,609

$1,000 32,379 16,493 20,095 511 9,290

$5,000 to $9,999 ................................................................farms 10,731 3,934 5,746 147 2,875

$1,000 75,936 27,592 41,029 1,054 20,269

$10,000 to $19,999 ............................................................farms 10,529 2,807 4,943 133 1,800

$1,000 147,880 38,969 70,203 1,874 25,452

$20,000 to $24,999 ............................................................farms 2,965 923 1,545 46 489

$1,000 65,247 20,252 34,269 1,004 10,809

$25,000 to $39,999 ............................................................farms 4,932 1,592 2,884 68 964

$1,000 153,476 49,613 90,821 2,092 30,345

$40,000 to $49,999 ............................................................farms 1,954 680 1,219 25 325

$1,000 86,245 29,850 54,101 1,101 14,318

$50,000 to $99,999 ............................................................farms 4,563 1,838 3,067 56 664

$1,000 320,139 129,394 222,378 3,896 46,571

$100,000 to $249,999 ........................................................farms 3,651 1,939 5,695 57 515

$1,000 588,738 307,708 972,348 8,642 82,697

$250,000 to $499,999 ........................................................farms 1,675 1,077 2,718 31 329

$1,000 603,357 380,667 955,587 10,369 119,053

$500,000 or more ..............................................................farms 1,837 1,662 2,242 29 961

$1,000 3,715,900 3,374,081 3,334,777 35,109 1,987,659 2002 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) ...............................................farms 20,060 11,060 17,658 207 10,752

$1,000 2,257 1,891 1,891 28 1,066

$1,000 to $2,499 ................................................................farms 9,867 7,813 6,736 80 3,744

$1,000 16,412 12,606 11,172 132 6,148

$2,500 to $4,999 ................................................................farms 9,925 4,737 5,881 110 2,543

$1,000 35,590 16,704 21,088 388 9,104

$5,000 to $9,999 ................................................................farms 12,452 4,043 5,134 98 2,204

$1,000 87,909 28,351 36,297 659 15,466

$10,000 to $19,999 ............................................................farms 10,056 3,107 4,643 94 1,683

$1,000 139,858 43,427 65,183 1,310 23,216

$20,000 to $24,999 ............................................................farms 2,777 804 1,341 36 434

$1,000 61,345 17,698 29,660 795 9,515

$25,000 to $39,999 ............................................................farms 5,437 1,591 2,217 45 676

$1,000 169,164 49,857 69,945 1,404 20,988

$40,000 to $49,999 ............................................................farms 1,936 815 1,075 20 245

$1,000 85,330 35,978 47,701 864 10,854

$50,000 to $99,999 ............................................................farms 4,340 1,876 3,823 56 600

$1,000 302,570 131,951 282,356 4,042 41,875

$100,000 to $249,999 ........................................................farms 3,647 1,935 6,195 65 571

$1,000 568,762 313,626 956,471 10,375 92,109

$250,000 to $499,999 ........................................................farms 1,609 1,113 1,977 19 399

$1,000 561,561 389,960 678,145 6,753 142,294

$500,000 or more ..............................................................farms 1,194 1,139 1,425 28 690

$1,000 2,425,646 2,153,448 2,057,051 28,797 1,117,115 Value of sales by commodity or commodity group:

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse ...............farms, 2007 26,515 16,488 33,119 705 8,781 2002 22,786 16,853 28,094 526 7,869

$1,000, 2007 1,187,625 2,976,087 1,869,706 55,602 798,490 2002 819,078 2,194,911 1,320,914 47,138 593,245 Grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas .............................................................farms, 2007 9,450 1,845 15,771 20 3,365 2002 10,524 2,217 13,621 23 2,755

$1,000, 2007 698,093 316,772 500,428 94 214,661 2002 432,194 149,648 203,156 171 81,580 Corn .................................................................farms, 2007 1,034 379 13,436 17 2,591 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 149,778 37,084 319,930 93 129,332 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Wheat ..............................................................farms, 2007 8,555 1,400 4,463 - 711 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 464,517 255,159 45,332 - 17,941 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Soybeans .........................................................farms, 2007 951 2 5,713 - 1,974 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 36,486 (D) 122,103 - 64,675 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Sorghum ..........................................................farms, 2007 981 4 158 - 87 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 38,706 (D) 506 - 1,003 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Barley ..............................................................farms, 2007 42 331 1,787 - 25 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 (D) 12,468 5,325 - 115 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Rice .................................................................farms, 2007 3 - - - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 (D) - - - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Other grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas .........................................................farms, 2007 535 382 4,175 3 460 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 7,543 12,017 7,232 1 1,595 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 300 UNITED STATES 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Total sales (see text) ....................................................... farms, 2007 31,169 79,280 247,437 16,700 6,984 2002 31,736 87,595 228,926 15,282 6,571

$1,000, 2007 6,570,450 2,617,394 21,001,074 1,415,678 673,713 2002 3,834,625 2,199,814 14,134,744 1,115,898 473,065 Average per farm .................................................. dollars, 2007 210,801 33,015 84,874 84,771 96,465 2002 120,829 25,113 61,744 73,020 71,993 2007 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) ............................................... farms 6,981 27,068 86,279 4,806 1,778

$1,000 465 4,089 11,329 685 341

$1,000 to $2,499 ............................................................... farms 1,296 11,454 30,608 2,253 803

$1,000 2,174 19,346 50,794 3,710 1,297

$2,500 to $4,999 ............................................................... farms 1,077 9,539 28,630 1,857 695

$1,000 3,860 34,108 102,467 6,595 2,511

$5,000 to $9,999 ............................................................... farms 1,433 11,217 30,256 1,951 841

$1,000 10,349 79,899 213,977 13,855 5,930

$10,000 to $19,999 ........................................................... farms 1,809 7,476 23,546 1,528 710

$1,000 26,034 104,602 328,934 21,289 9,633

$20,000 to $24,999 ........................................................... farms 706 2,012 6,554 466 192

$1,000 15,727 44,182 144,638 10,255 4,207

$25,000 to $39,999 ........................................................... farms 1,576 3,393 10,804 948 365

$1,000 50,300 105,537 338,673 29,897 11,501

$40,000 to $49,999 ........................................................... farms 939 1,319 4,406 415 132

$1,000 41,910 58,180 194,666 18,463 5,850

$50,000 to $99,999 ........................................................... farms 3,409 2,001 8,774 860 390

$1,000 247,296 139,821 612,408 60,967 28,264

$100,000 to $249,999 ....................................................... farms 5,511 1,630 7,238 785 473

$1,000 919,156 262,088 1,154,800 125,943 77,936

$250,000 to $499,999 ....................................................... farms 3,588 956 4,296 400 314

$1,000 1,267,732 342,793 1,544,859 141,815 108,787

$500,000 or more .............................................................. farms 2,844 1,215 6,046 431 291

$1,000 3,985,447 1,422,750 16,303,529 982,202 417,456 2002 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) ............................................... farms 5,765 24,910 64,572 5,628 1,705

$1,000 327 3,698 9,765 597 281

$1,000 to $2,499 ............................................................... farms 1,187 17,831 37,501 1,664 968

$1,000 1,977 29,551 62,090 2,698 1,545

$2,500 to $4,999 ............................................................... farms 1,412 12,859 32,353 1,455 699

$1,000 5,047 45,398 115,234 5,185 2,508

$5,000 to $9,999 ............................................................... farms 1,774 12,311 29,248 1,399 610

$1,000 12,886 86,097 205,491 9,822 4,224

$10,000 to $19,999 ........................................................... farms 2,528 8,129 23,027 1,350 517

$1,000 36,479 112,444 319,231 19,116 7,265

$20,000 to $24,999 ........................................................... farms 1,002 1,883 5,565 383 116

$1,000 22,154 41,581 122,625 8,512 2,544

$25,000 to $39,999 ........................................................... farms 2,472 2,822 9,582 720 262

$1,000 78,246 87,591 299,157 22,509 8,254

$40,000 to $49,999 ........................................................... farms 1,366 869 3,645 308 134

$1,000 60,739 38,353 161,380 13,581 5,864

$50,000 to $99,999 ........................................................... farms 4,564 2,133 8,769 788 393

$1,000 327,010 148,735 610,754 56,270 29,418

$100,000 to $249,999 ....................................................... farms 6,117 1,915 7,465 788 716

$1,000 967,274 309,966 1,185,554 126,338 116,150

$250,000 to $499,999 ....................................................... farms 2,324 1,131 3,836 419 269

$1,000 794,925 396,453 1,336,948 146,615 92,123

$500,000 or more .............................................................. farms 1,225 802 3,363 380 182

$1,000 1,527,562 899,948 9,706,516 704,654 202,890 Value of sales by commodity or commodity group:

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse ............... farms, 2007 18,146 23,108 67,997 6,974 4,027 2002 17,585 29,143 56,090 5,088 3,521

$1,000, 2007 3,383,497 1,147,786 6,565,576 372,396 99,262 2002 1,575,910 1,072,548 3,731,751 257,797 71,583 Grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas ............................................................ farms, 2007 15,123 5,533 14,713 1,496 232 2002 14,792 5,361 16,490 1,158 138

$1,000, 2007 3,238,162 496,727 2,472,814 58,897 5,439 2002 1,406,137 344,880 1,099,460 30,139 2,768 Corn ................................................................ farms, 2007 12,076 4,494 5,124 640 218 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 1,412,488 279,356 1,089,321 21,199 4,890 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Wheat .............................................................. farms, 2007 7,144 1,340 8,372 599 6 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 713,110 46,088 689,274 30,173 124 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Soybeans ........................................................ farms, 2007 10,122 3,133 494 - 13 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 949,942 164,911 29,210 - 401 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Sorghum .......................................................... farms, 2007 421 78 6,154 7 -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 19,786 3,083 540,821 89 -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Barley .............................................................. farms, 2007 190 16 26 456 1 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 3,795 148 425 4,433 (D) 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Rice ................................................................. farms, 2007 - 6 385 - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 - 2,293 98,385 - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Other grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas ........................................................ farms, 2007 2,564 62 1,393 353 7 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 139,042 848 25,379 3,003 (D) 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA UNITED STATES 301 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Total sales (see text) .......................................................farms, 2007 47,383 39,284 23,618 78,463 11,069 2002 47,606 35,939 20,812 77,131 9,422

$1,000, 2007 2,906,188 6,792,856 591,665 8,967,358 1,157,535 2002 2,360,911 5,330,740 482,814 5,623,275 863,887 Average per farm ................................................... dollars, 2007 61,334 172,917 25,051 114,288 104,575 2002 49,593 148,327 23,199 72,906 91,688 2007 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) ...............................................farms 14,738 13,826 7,589 24,588 3,222

$1,000 2,248 1,852 1,777 3,130 298

$1,000 to $2,499 ................................................................farms 5,453 4,617 4,844 5,708 698

$1,000 9,177 7,694 7,720 9,485 1,138

$2,500 to $4,999 ................................................................farms 5,391 3,817 3,531 5,955 918

$1,000 19,645 13,456 12,477 21,676 3,249

$5,000 to $9,999 ................................................................farms 6,191 3,717 2,913 6,732 947

$1,000 44,218 26,073 20,363 48,316 6,739

$10,000 to $19,999 ............................................................farms 5,141 2,582 2,050 5,865 883

$1,000 72,012 36,135 28,205 83,710 12,428

$20,000 to $24,999 ............................................................farms 1,456 841 488 1,867 378

$1,000 32,187 18,438 10,783 41,568 8,363

$25,000 to $39,999 ............................................................farms 2,428 1,507 724 3,866 617

$1,000 75,928 47,606 22,468 123,068 19,602

$40,000 to $49,999 ............................................................farms 971 683 309 1,838 305

$1,000 42,772 30,190 13,760 81,988 13,600

$50,000 to $99,999 ............................................................farms 1,886 1,729 421 5,397 975

$1,000 132,093 121,344 28,982 389,003 70,601

$100,000 to $249,999 ........................................................farms 1,421 1,950 314 8,550 1,176

$1,000 230,589 321,930 50,839 1,406,417 187,899

$250,000 to $499,999 ........................................................farms 926 1,579 176 4,639 555

$1,000 339,141 563,523 61,461 1,603,196 196,789

$500,000 or more ..............................................................farms 1,381 2,436 259 3,458 395

$1,000 1,906,175 5,604,614 332,829 5,155,802 636,830 2002 value of sales:

Less than $1,000 (see text) ...............................................farms 11,418 10,420 7,835 24,161 2,067

$1,000 1,605 1,143 1,015 1,767 160

$1,000 to $2,499 ................................................................farms 7,006 4,585 4,219 6,330 828

$1,000 11,788 7,454 6,709 10,461 1,393

$2,500 to $4,999 ................................................................farms 6,669 3,244 2,712 5,389 575

$1,000 23,933 11,473 9,647 19,454 2,057

$5,000 to $9,999 ................................................................farms 6,946 3,106 2,398 5,788 935

$1,000 48,954 21,600 16,732 41,633 6,652

$10,000 to $19,999 ............................................................farms 5,424 2,628 1,533 6,128 900

$1,000 75,413 36,480 21,013 87,632 12,611

$20,000 to $24,999 ............................................................farms 1,313 826 342 2,234 324

$1,000 29,035 18,162 7,543 49,569 7,164

$25,000 to $39,999 ............................................................farms 2,200 1,643 523 3,924 622

$1,000 69,178 51,515 16,072 124,830 19,665

$40,000 to $49,999 ............................................................farms 860 735 172 2,005 366

$1,000 38,088 32,358 7,596 89,555 16,255

$50,000 to $99,999 ............................................................farms 1,849 2,157 383 7,242 998

$1,000 129,275 155,079 26,226 529,536 72,729

$100,000 to $249,999 ........................................................farms 1,708 2,893 297 9,247 1,069

$1,000 277,501 470,504 46,513 1,454,143 168,621

$250,000 to $499,999 ........................................................farms 1,137 1,741 172 2,945 441

$1,000 396,285 606,439 60,455 999,152 148,552

$500,000 or more ..............................................................farms 1,076 1,961 226 1,738 297

$1,000 1,259,855 3,918,533 263,294 2,215,542 408,030 Value of sales by commodity or commodity group:

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse ...............farms, 2007 16,493 16,374 9,086 43,189 3,622 2002 17,672 17,117 5,883 36,708 2,701

$1,000, 2007 858,301 4,754,898 78,308 2,669,326 213,808 2002 718,219 3,582,818 69,693 1,690,071 137,776 Grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas .............................................................farms, 2007 4,119 3,378 697 27,775 1,051 2002 4,164 4,036 496 25,170 896

$1,000, 2007 269,782 958,931 11,960 1,643,341 72,618 2002 157,985 581,991 9,575 893,272 44,522 Corn .................................................................farms, 2007 3,125 849 565 24,112 450 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 115,268 134,673 6,549 1,136,931 25,840 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Wheat ..............................................................farms, 2007 1,328 2,591 113 5,377 345 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 51,197 696,309 1,779 96,576 15,817 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Soybeans .........................................................farms, 2007 2,121 11 119 13,821 2 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 97,961 642 3,399 390,672 (D) 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Sorghum ..........................................................farms, 2007 53 - 3 11 6 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 245 - (D) 25 (D) 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Barley ..............................................................farms, 2007 472 827 35 479 338 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 3,863 58,084 89 1,272 15,346 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Rice .................................................................farms, 2007 - - - - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 - - - - -

2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

Other grains, oilseeds, dry beans, and dry peas .........................................................farms, 2007 352 816 113 5,718 344 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

$1,000, 2007 1,247 69,223 (D) 17,865 15,562 2002 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 302 UNITED STATES 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item United States Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Total sales (see text) - Con.

Value of sales by commodity or commodity group - Con.

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse - Con.

Tobacco .............................................................. farms, 2007 16,228 - - - - -

2002 56,879 6 - - - -

$1,000, 2007 1,268,114 - - - - -

2002 1,616,533 698 - - - -

Cotton and cottonseed ........................................ farms, 2007 18,591 918 - 301 915 854 2002 24,721 1,305 - 409 1,192 1,392

$1,000, 2007 4,898,608 104,632 - 147,761 473,019 586,267 2002 4,005,366 125,232 - 150,682 379,253 682,996 Vegetables, melons, potatoes, and sweet potatoes 1 .......................................................... farms, 2007 69,100 1,602 95 2,518 809 3,958 2002 59,044 1,407 86 282 516 4,131

$1,000, 2007 14,683,058 33,902 4,281 865,260 38,145 5,435,521 2002 12,785,898 40,649 4,017 749,667 23,342 4,785,101 Fruits, tree nuts, and berries ............................... farms, 2007 112,690 1,708 41 1,326 620 38,034 2002 107,707 1,548 22 1,192 599 36,386

$1,000, 2007 18,625,459 27,610 75 97,745 13,209 11,054,581 2002 13,770,603 20,543 (D) (D) 12,920 8,720,660 Nursery, greenhouse, floriculture, and sod (see text) .................................................... farms, 2007 50,784 675 138 281 357 3,634 2002 56,070 797 111 367 330 4,423

$1,000, 2007 16,632,734 264,807 15,478 417,792 48,049 3,647,057 2002 14,686,390 251,463 12,680 284,463 46,982 3,286,627 Cut Christmas trees and short-rotation woody crops ...................................................... farms, 2007 13,374 59 - 10 51 322 2002 14,744 91 2 15 41 403

$1,000, 2007 384,594 1,036 - 19 1,168 5,704 2002 399,848 1,200 (D) (D) 332 12,028 Other crops and hay (see text) ............................ farms, 2007 434,502 8,976 201 849 9,555 5,265 2002 359,262 6,234 198 777 5,915 5,730

$1,000, 2007 9,950,098 124,344 4,328 266,943 74,476 1,068,522 2002 7,929,618 87,535 3,057 186,297 34,672 943,216 Livestock, poultry, and their products ...................... farms, 2007 1,080,312 28,121 303 8,301 29,296 23,192 2002 1,094,608 28,496 262 3,220 30,956 22,342

$1,000, 2007 153,562,563 3,738,563 32,271 1,321,538 4,607,833 10,982,043 2002 105,494,401 2,674,681 25,600 807,672 3,330,014 6,584,451 Poultry and eggs ................................................. farms, 2007 148,911 4,884 88 1,022 5,640 4,114 2002 83,381 3,839 47 303 5,148 1,980

$1,000, 2007 37,065,947 3,113,194 207 (D) 3,716,164 1,536,763 2002 23,972,333 2,137,299 104 (D) 2,617,592 1,017,988 Cattle and calves ................................................. farms, 2007 798,290 21,356 75 4,078 23,731 12,681 2002 851,971 23,088 83 2,030 25,955 12,897

$1,000, 2007 61,209,970 408,276 768 585,479 625,996 2,536,571 2002 45,115,184 348,253 759 403,959 421,266 1,582,334 Milk and other dairy products from cows ............. farms, 2007 69,763 165 7 190 369 1,953 2002 78,963 266 18 127 396 2,422

$1,000, 2007 31,848,029 38,270 1,487 634,509 44,770 6,569,172 2002 20,281,166 46,129 3,246 352,784 54,049 3,739,213 Hogs and pigs ..................................................... farms, 2007 74,789 547 50 284 954 1,267 2002 82,028 561 47 168 867 1,513

$1,000, 2007 18,056,981 54,618 242 (D) 84,202 34,188 2002 12,400,977 39,441 205 (D) 123,803 27,488 Sheep, goats, and their products ......................... farms, 2007 121,171 2,410 40 3,437 1,584 4,635 2002 96,249 1,383 36 441 1,033 4,256

$1,000, 2007 704,855 3,128 48 (D) 2,573 71,890 2002 541,745 1,534 29 4,028 1,604 52,418 Horses, ponies, mules, burros, and donkeys ............................................................. farms, 2007 114,317 3,039 44 1,452 2,512 3,937 2002 128,045 2,885 29 900 2,707 4,033

$1,000, 2007 2,061,862 13,434 247 12,126 9,877 72,433 2002 1,328,733 13,851 111 (D) 12,865 32,397 Aquaculture (see text) ........................................ farms, 2007 6,409 313 51 15 248 217 2002 6,653 449 47 10 244 204

$1,000, 2007 1,415,271 99,504 28,540 2,713 118,744 102,228 2002 1,132,524 80,976 20,807 755 92,638 64,557 Other animals and other animal products (see text) ............................................. farms, 2007 43,226 586 66 249 668 1,583 2002 29,391 412 59 151 509 1,665

$1,000, 2007 1,199,649 8,140 731 7,206 5,507 58,798 2002 721,738 7,198 339 1,976 6,196 68,057 Value of agricultural products sold directly to individuals for human consumption (see text) .............................................. farms, 2007 136,817 2,175 149 863 1,657 7,068 2002 116,733 1,822 110 711 1,476 6,436

$1,000, 2007 1,211,270 8,325 1,682 5,247 8,161 162,896 2002 812,204 8,039 829 3,911 5,674 114,356 See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA UNITED STATES 303 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Total sales (see text) - Con.

Value of sales by commodity or commodity group - Con.

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse - Con.

Tobacco ...............................................................farms, 2007 - 75 - 23 224 -

2002 - 80 - 115 822 -

$1,000, 2007 - 56,976 - 4,715 56,978 -

2002 - 36,233 - 15,919 89,058 -

Cotton and cottonseed .........................................farms, 2007 - - - 213 2,577 -

2002 - - - 267 3,206 -

$1,000, 2007 - - - 28,469 434,014 -

2002 - - - 21,037 318,013 -

Vegetables, melons, potatoes, and sweet potatoes 1 ...........................................................farms, 2007 738 733 234 1,493 1,346 866 2002 654 582 248 1,559 1,715 666

$1,000, 2007 289,345 30,230 71,479 1,422,150 459,612 61,256 2002 297,752 19,120 50,773 1,013,022 383,556 54,554 Fruits, tree nuts, and berries ................................farms, 2007 767 499 64 8,858 3,397 3,667 2002 582 366 67 9,674 3,611 2,582

$1,000, 2007 23,192 28,641 (D) 2,144,718 201,504 154,315 2002 15,735 14,721 2,496 1,611,562 122,151 179,475 Nursery, greenhouse, floriculture, and sod (see text) .....................................................farms, 2007 564 638 175 4,778 1,030 1,628 2002 535 685 129 4,718 1,199 1,386

$1,000, 2007 299,585 269,221 17,114 2,115,641 317,291 119,593 2002 261,426 245,773 22,420 1,844,064 315,324 110,282 Cut Christmas trees and short-rotation woody crops .......................................................farms, 2007 122 338 41 53 144 44 2002 91 382 58 79 188 19

$1,000, 2007 1,238 3,840 (D) 390 3,380 282 2002 398 3,407 401 1,056 2,095 336 Other crops and hay (see text) ............................farms, 2007 9,415 1,493 218 3,312 8,593 274 2002 6,410 1,064 227 2,484 7,691 271

$1,000, 2007 318,285 10,148 2,375 506,801 368,738 75,118 2002 192,590 6,863 1,921 516,974 246,936 86,061 Livestock, poultry, and their products ......................farms, 2007 17,525 2,040 1,372 21,333 23,271 1,531 2002 16,866 1,490 1,306 20,824 25,319 1,007

$1,000, 2007 4,079,735 150,181 872,400 1,529,000 4,970,596 83,711 2002 3,308,918 143,110 468,449 1,200,839 3,332,156 88,067 Poultry and eggs ..................................................farms, 2007 2,515 801 978 2,984 5,041 282 2002 861 415 857 1,387 3,883 110

$1,000, 2007 161,320 45,274 837,378 410,148 4,246,765 (D) 2002 113,256 62,411 440,774 336,295 2,780,214 12,545 Cattle and calves .................................................farms, 2007 11,963 805 307 14,146 16,261 713 2002 11,877 715 276 14,149 18,770 550

$1,000, 2007 3,156,348 9,405 7,567 436,193 342,392 44,011 2002 2,632,740 7,025 3,254 328,820 240,070 30,719 Milk and other dairy products from cows .............farms, 2007 447 261 83 227 651 5 2002 260 218 89 452 517 10

$1,000, 2007 456,076 72,338 21,715 412,211 264,423 7,018 2002 247,095 56,523 20,651 371,691 212,720 21,745 Hogs and pigs ......................................................farms, 2007 1,230 251 84 1,326 830 148 2002 1,158 176 86 1,090 995 158

$1,000, 2007 159,808 616 2,754 2,220 68,369 (D) 2002 179,415 (D) 2,853 3,154 65,384 4,612 Sheep, goats, and their products .........................farms, 2007 2,273 434 140 2,001 2,244 266 2002 1,926 269 78 1,249 1,792 145

$1,000, 2007 84,730 1,094 (D) 2,419 4,137 923 2002 72,479 528 45 1,348 1,940 1,081 Horses, ponies, mules, burros, and donkeys .............................................................farms, 2007 3,324 221 92 3,576 2,357 96 2002 3,764 156 150 3,996 2,677 82

$1,000, 2007 29,304 4,868 2,278 167,784 21,326 (D) 2002 21,365 2,671 588 73,858 16,573 418 Aquaculture (see text) ......................................... farms, 2007 55 49 4 469 146 59 2002 66 41 13 777 159 67

$1,000, 2007 11,258 15,142 (D) 61,340 14,075 14,057 2002 28,805 12,848 240 56,949 5,310 14,005 Other animals and other animal products (see text) .............................................farms, 2007 1,052 271 57 1,206 762 196 2002 896 221 23 1,062 433 65

$1,000, 2007 20,890 1,444 203 36,686 9,109 5,787 2002 13,763 (D) 43 28,724 9,944 2,940 Value of agricultural products sold directly to individuals for human consumption (see text) ..............................................farms, 2007 2,777 1,099 216 3,181 1,890 1,141 2002 2,343 853 149 2,479 1,626 796

$1,000, 2007 22,584 29,752 3,505 19,363 13,146 8,657 2002 17,406 17,108 2,856 12,370 8,958 7,089 See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 304 UNITED STATES 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Total sales (see text) - Con.

Value of sales by commodity or commodity group - Con.

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse - Con.

Tobacco .............................................................. farms, 2007 - 13 267 - - 8,112 2002 - 6 1,286 3 12 29,253

$1,000, 2007 - 2,620 6,598 - - 314,151 2002 - 955 13,290 29 (D) 403,991 Cotton and cottonseed ........................................ farms, 2007 - - - - 110 -

2002 - - - - 162 -

$1,000, 2007 - - - - 13,673 -

2002 - - - - 15,762 -

Vegetables, melons, potatoes, and sweet potatoes 1 .......................................................... farms, 2007 1,259 1,382 1,380 885 474 2,098 2002 1,307 1,115 1,175 757 270 1,474

$1,000, 2007 783,807 103,914 78,719 16,310 24,767 20,937 2002 752,994 98,067 77,583 19,491 14,317 17,757 Fruits, tree nuts, and berries ............................... farms, 2007 420 627 749 735 344 713 2002 340 772 676 412 209 723

$1,000, 2007 30,036 10,246 19,193 7,371 7,293 3,088 2002 17,471 18,559 15,787 4,496 (D) 5,941 Nursery, greenhouse, floriculture, and sod (see text) .................................................... farms, 2007 548 1,159 888 536 399 1,191 2002 458 1,108 1,117 554 369 1,193

$1,000, 2007 87,373 435,073 126,241 93,813 77,031 87,748 2002 66,297 357,506 187,529 77,610 57,561 96,094 Cut Christmas trees and short-rotation woody crops ...................................................... farms, 2007 80 248 202 169 67 129 2002 56 338 265 215 102 143

$1,000, 2007 2,096 6,473 2,662 1,026 473 876 2002 862 7,633 2,775 1,424 (D) 1,019 Other crops and hay (see text) ............................ farms, 2007 7,853 9,216 8,493 12,209 13,231 21,670 2002 6,911 8,005 8,449 12,703 12,466 17,200

$1,000, 2007 615,179 60,325 64,391 102,032 253,930 110,671 2002 469,820 53,716 48,800 109,695 225,361 67,080 Livestock, poultry, and their products ...................... farms, 2007 12,627 22,851 23,677 38,275 31,417 46,912 2002 12,155 23,957 24,616 40,829 32,818 47,382

$1,000, 2007 3,363,976 2,452,692 2,952,272 10,074,511 9,525,971 3,419,792 2002 2,121,090 1,804,697 1,790,411 6,202,362 6,327,797 1,969,871 Poultry and eggs ................................................. farms, 2007 1,075 2,708 3,798 3,174 2,388 4,088 2002 631 1,063 1,614 1,572 1,102 1,649

$1,000, 2007 12,673 163,507 887,196 872,263 69,807 978,025 2002 12,636 83,807 455,153 511,949 (D) 561,178 Cattle and calves ................................................. farms, 2007 9,662 16,046 15,088 27,535 27,565 38,212 2002 9,035 17,699 16,879 29,515 29,589 40,429

$1,000, 2007 1,383,742 808,487 456,657 3,606,633 8,542,872 935,611 2002 1,149,407 624,976 324,054 2,119,935 5,715,204 622,855 Milk and other dairy products from cows ............. farms, 2007 809 1,255 2,071 2,465 795 2,273 2002 790 1,442 2,345 2,913 842 2,208

$1,000, 2007 1,843,788 340,336 583,212 689,680 376,511 250,305 2002 869,526 226,761 333,339 442,431 248,542 214,365 Hogs and pigs ..................................................... farms, 2007 728 3,063 3,790 8,758 1,542 1,210 2002 980 4,313 4,603 11,275 1,939 1,220

$1,000, 2007 6,757 1,105,271 974,290 4,827,224 506,448 90,198 2002 3,260 844,360 633,112 3,078,455 297,505 69,722 Sheep, goats, and their products ......................... farms, 2007 1,516 2,551 3,000 4,386 1,876 3,508 2002 1,398 2,049 2,525 3,842 1,569 2,270

$1,000, 2007 27,373 6,523 7,422 40,199 12,027 7,208 2002 22,212 3,591 4,419 23,366 5,986 4,679 Horses, ponies, mules, burros, and donkeys ............................................................. farms, 2007 1,873 1,801 2,749 2,706 1,862 5,391 2002 2,396 2,269 3,538 2,845 2,120 5,315

$1,000, 2007 12,808 16,748 15,472 12,681 8,637 952,384 2002 10,267 15,327 17,440 13,643 (D) 491,345 Aquaculture (see text) ........................................ farms, 2007 70 54 31 40 26 81 2002 85 54 47 47 30 146

$1,000, 2007 56,219 4,011 2,567 3,507 2,228 2,683 2002 39,840 2,282 3,151 2,308 745 2,017 Other animals and other animal products (see text) ............................................. farms, 2007 527 896 1,057 940 671 1,262 2002 301 458 651 563 393 744

$1,000, 2007 20,615 7,807 25,457 22,324 7,441 203,380 2002 13,940 3,594 19,743 10,276 5,002 3,709 Value of agricultural products sold directly to individuals for human consumption (see text) .............................................. farms, 2007 2,076 2,818 3,576 2,987 2,140 3,445 2002 1,632 2,333 3,205 2,455 1,796 2,565

$1,000, 2007 7,840 25,893 22,268 16,506 9,272 15,173 2002 5,889 18,412 17,968 11,651 9,001 10,497 See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA UNITED STATES 305 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Total sales (see text) - Con.

Value of sales by commodity or commodity group - Con.

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse - Con.

Tobacco ...............................................................farms, 2007 - - 69 59 - -

2002 6 - 160 50 - -

$1,000, 2007 - - 1,367 15,775 - -

2002 (D) - 2,713 15,355 - -

Cotton and cottonseed .........................................farms, 2007 644 - - - - -

2002 1,072 - - - - -

$1,000, 2007 173,959 - - - - -

2002 158,806 - - - - -

Vegetables, melons, potatoes, and sweet potatoes 1 ...........................................................farms, 2007 748 976 940 1,010 2,871 2,720 2002 659 977 843 880 2,676 2,774

$1,000, 2007 53,448 155,147 56,394 59,180 347,305 275,912 2002 40,319 126,049 60,488 38,289 322,510 291,285 Fruits, tree nuts, and berries ................................farms, 2007 926 1,102 608 1,207 3,407 934 2002 886 998 468 1,086 2,797 655

$1,000, 2007 19,358 85,183 19,393 100,623 392,472 18,517 2002 (D) 33,970 12,967 55,508 181,469 12,948 Nursery, greenhouse, floriculture, and sod (see text) .....................................................farms, 2007 498 676 691 814 2,128 918 2002 665 769 769 902 2,185 983

$1,000, 2007 103,154 51,687 208,692 169,167 623,097 239,354 2002 87,833 37,334 188,484 153,540 628,699 224,410 Cut Christmas trees and short-rotation woody crops .......................................................farms, 2007 87 236 180 280 900 280 2002 113 216 204 306 1,076 327

$1,000, 2007 4,670 (D) 2,398 (D) 29,155 4,984 2002 (D) 2,293 2,313 1,800 30,411 11,855 Other crops and hay (see text) ............................farms, 2007 3,521 2,401 2,850 1,906 14,547 16,042 2002 2,816 1,757 2,129 1,449 12,504 15,306

$1,000, 2007 399,517 (D) 33,115 (D) 227,165 573,994 2002 396,391 14,916 15,682 11,220 208,618 471,367 Livestock, poultry, and their products ......................farms, 2007 15,107 3,233 5,970 3,187 20,306 31,511 2002 15,050 2,546 5,426 2,114 18,203 33,319

$1,000, 2007 1,013,334 290,617 1,205,787 125,338 2,423,291 6,131,554 2002 750,192 241,247 843,101 107,244 1,409,807 4,012,745 Poultry and eggs ..................................................farms, 2007 1,568 1,195 1,833 1,269 4,831 4,392 2002 1,081 734 1,316 565 2,206 2,667

$1,000, 2007 575,989 75,831 903,531 13,207 258,994 1,045,674 2002 417,755 78,848 583,343 12,107 146,700 750,088 Cattle and calves .................................................farms, 2007 10,977 1,447 2,947 1,066 11,631 22,122 2002 11,925 1,223 3,004 795 11,293 22,961

$1,000, 2007 223,922 15,660 58,293 12,444 449,371 1,385,740 2002 170,569 15,994 50,570 9,612 298,517 873,074 Milk and other dairy products from cows .............farms, 2007 321 461 676 310 2,453 5,258 2002 445 436 730 264 2,738 6,226

$1,000, 2007 72,020 126,392 192,426 50,485 1,285,571 1,475,929 2002 82,866 87,544 169,458 (D) 697,920 931,754 Hogs and pigs ......................................................farms, 2007 525 460 454 350 2,930 4,748 2002 540 310 379 250 2,336 6,390

$1,000, 2007 1,235 813 (D) 2,108 357,495 2,139,877 2002 (D) (D) 8,268 (D) 200,027 1,398,234 Sheep, goats, and their products .........................farms, 2007 893 709 1,137 697 2,762 2,944 2002 594 490 745 459 2,307 2,891

$1,000, 2007 889 1,979 (D) (D) 8,867 18,725 2002 392 801 1,179 1,127 6,613 13,351 Horses, ponies, mules, burros, and donkeys .............................................................farms, 2007 2,554 322 813 348 3,010 2,238 2002 1,940 393 674 324 3,286 3,184

$1,000, 2007 20,118 (D) 31,815 5,703 23,550 11,424 2002 (D) 2,802 23,760 3,879 23,743 14,669 Aquaculture (see text) ......................................... farms, 2007 729 98 48 273 87 104 2002 474 78 48 140 83 103

$1,000, 2007 109,138 26,300 4,023 18,548 5,721 12,492 2002 41,285 31,944 1,459 9,481 3,316 8,991 Other animals and other animal products (see text) .............................................farms, 2007 386 359 452 449 1,497 1,193 2002 280 278 270 312 1,152 1,039

$1,000, 2007 10,022 (D) 3,920 (D) 33,721 41,692 2002 24,979 (D) 5,065 19,589 32,972 22,584 Value of agricultural products sold directly to individuals for human consumption (see text) ..............................................farms, 2007 1,276 1,705 1,407 1,659 6,373 4,293 2002 1,216 1,454 1,168 1,259 4,925 3,847

$1,000, 2007 9,175 18,419 21,220 42,065 58,923 34,667 2002 4,897 11,237 12,551 31,315 37,269 22,763 See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 306 UNITED STATES 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire Total sales (see text) - Con.

Value of sales by commodity or commodity group - Con.

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse - Con.

Tobacco .............................................................. farms, 2007 - 111 - - - -

2002 7 338 - - - -

$1,000, 2007 - 5,022 - - - -

2002 496 5,854 - - - -

Cotton and cottonseed ........................................ farms, 2007 980 498 - - - -

2002 1,590 596 - - - -

$1,000, 2007 362,705 164,714 - - - -

2002 444,136 137,378 - - - -

Vegetables, melons, potatoes, and sweet potatoes 1 .......................................................... farms, 2007 1,156 1,340 315 344 49 426 2002 903 961 242 261 54 320

$1,000, 2007 82,498 61,705 39,429 63,840 56,356 12,716 2002 39,942 36,723 28,027 58,337 35,689 8,465 Fruits, tree nuts, and berries ............................... farms, 2007 962 606 412 253 42 419 2002 1,001 1,113 372 158 51 278

$1,000, 2007 33,498 4,315 7,877 2,594 (D) 12,968 2002 14,093 22,823 5,771 1,375 (D) 9,321 Nursery, greenhouse, floriculture, and sod (see text) .................................................... farms, 2007 479 913 367 371 45 382 2002 390 932 318 355 50 337

$1,000, 2007 46,007 121,280 29,472 41,215 11,949 65,554 2002 38,967 101,316 33,832 34,259 10,115 53,691 Cut Christmas trees and short-rotation woody crops ...................................................... farms, 2007 147 131 51 71 1 181 2002 162 196 54 84 2 173

$1,000, 2007 7,936 1,078 232 592 (D) (D) 2002 7,611 1,843 623 797 (D) 2,028 Other crops and hay (see text) ............................ farms, 2007 4,907 25,596 6,981 9,733 942 1,453 2002 3,702 21,460 6,234 9,395 856 1,099

$1,000, 2007 45,511 173,618 187,672 206,577 141,930 (D) 2002 22,776 139,973 157,980 201,613 108,678 8,398 Livestock, poultry, and their products ...................... farms, 2007 19,262 60,300 14,392 23,869 1,808 1,827 2002 21,399 65,589 14,587 26,809 1,855 1,301

$1,000, 2007 3,208,753 4,017,988 1,529,340 8,662,710 293,928 92,584 2002 2,090,909 2,990,809 1,148,791 6,315,392 289,259 61,686 Poultry and eggs ................................................. farms, 2007 3,262 6,114 1,396 1,875 213 793 2002 2,867 3,103 501 722 148 391

$1,000, 2007 2,438,690 1,265,166 7,975 165,265 (D) 15,390 2002 1,490,748 784,986 5,243 142,442 (D) 6,251 Cattle and calves ................................................. farms, 2007 14,535 52,060 11,526 20,218 1,260 599 2002 16,494 57,957 11,793 23,416 1,283 526

$1,000, 2007 323,621 1,676,632 1,368,699 7,358,555 181,758 6,743 2002 228,346 1,285,288 1,015,169 5,401,018 215,054 5,140 Milk and other dairy products from cows ............. farms, 2007 219 2,777 380 494 57 225 2002 431 3,233 235 642 47 194

$1,000, 2007 62,875 302,684 54,761 172,066 98,526 59,132 2002 67,954 300,460 41,842 148,941 62,074 (D)

Hogs and pigs ..................................................... farms, 2007 439 2,971 565 2,482 70 298 2002 504 3,752 542 3,594 102 212

$1,000, 2007 129,424 725,738 36,331 923,209 (D) 518 2002 82,298 570,551 26,531 590,581 930 (D)

Sheep, goats, and their products ......................... farms, 2007 1,026 3,677 1,522 1,637 330 514 2002 794 2,598 1,860 1,481 338 351

$1,000, 2007 1,659 9,580 20,962 10,072 7,003 (D) 2002 673 5,508 21,210 8,288 6,352 785 Horses, ponies, mules, burros, and donkeys ............................................................. farms, 2007 2,004 4,482 2,086 1,657 398 198 2002 2,684 5,710 2,527 1,761 448 174

$1,000, 2007 9,259 21,369 13,683 9,130 3,370 (D) 2002 11,390 27,111 12,870 11,098 2,928 875 Aquaculture (see text) ........................................ farms, 2007 488 72 28 38 5 25 2002 515 85 26 39 16 16

$1,000, 2007 237,883 9,506 3,188 3,826 (D) 3,734 2002 207,181 11,107 4,185 2,170 (D) 3,340 Other animals and other animal products (see text) ............................................. farms, 2007 514 1,254 407 408 64 289 2002 272 874 444 309 76 165

$1,000, 2007 5,343 7,313 23,742 20,585 898 (D) 2002 2,319 5,796 21,740 10,853 650 1,024 Value of agricultural products sold directly to individuals for human consumption (see text) .............................................. farms, 2007 1,229 4,341 1,287 1,288 200 982 2002 1,192 3,942 1,164 1,088 246 748

$1,000, 2007 9,659 20,982 6,321 5,902 1,074 16,021 2002 7,506 14,712 4,523 4,015 1,606 10,420 See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA UNITED STATES 307 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Total sales (see text) - Con.

Value of sales by commodity or commodity group - Con.

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse - Con.

Tobacco ...............................................................farms, 2007 - - - 2,622 - 475 2002 - - 1 7,836 - 1,835

$1,000, 2007 - - - 549,636 - 10,229 2002 - - (D) 630,397 - 17,244 Cotton and cottonseed .........................................farms, 2007 - 198 - 1,305 - -

2002 - 271 - 2,091 - -

$1,000, 2007 - 26,006 - 211,129 - -

2002 - 25,704 - 181,835 - -

Vegetables, melons, potatoes, and sweet potatoes 1 ...........................................................farms, 2007 1,453 1,706 3,189 3,745 227 2,902 2002 1,442 446 2,759 3,005 261 2,376

$1,000, 2007 181,543 88,996 338,037 333,939 162,655 135,355 2002 167,956 96,914 322,577 215,247 133,894 136,844 Fruits, tree nuts, and berries ................................farms, 2007 1,064 2,484 3,227 1,765 66 1,865 2002 966 2,102 2,989 1,376 23 1,814

$1,000, 2007 147,933 105,867 363,295 79,288 (D) 45,419 2002 87,148 59,061 180,540 55,756 (D) 34,532 Nursery, greenhouse, floriculture, and sod (see text) .....................................................farms, 2007 1,682 231 2,009 2,317 71 2,104 2002 1,828 223 2,552 2,587 78 2,678

$1,000, 2007 442,953 60,267 389,117 573,529 9,126 444,855 2002 356,863 41,585 344,320 424,478 11,025 464,617 Cut Christmas trees and short-rotation woody crops .......................................................farms, 2007 884 17 844 934 12 594 2002 899 20 1,001 1,043 15 775

$1,000, 2007 2,612 8 8,819 65,023 (D) 7,285 2002 3,852 369 (D) 57,625 (D) 9,323 Other crops and hay (see text) ............................farms, 2007 2,493 3,691 12,091 9,366 6,819 16,062 2002 2,054 2,187 11,028 8,400 4,972 15,079

$1,000, 2007 16,751 139,447 147,013 95,943 298,303 105,160 2002 11,791 105,368 118,837 84,001 231,530 101,213 Livestock, poultry, and their products ......................farms, 2007 4,017 10,550 17,317 26,448 11,352 33,031 2002 3,553 7,171 17,570 26,948 12,273 34,837

$1,000, 2007 135,233 1,621,940 2,856,706 7,707,350 1,045,697 2,960,490 2002 92,378 1,302,773 1,982,706 4,953,052 772,994 1,958,654 Poultry and eggs ..................................................farms, 2007 1,360 1,150 3,810 6,003 578 5,539 2002 910 465 1,742 4,807 243 3,452

$1,000, 2007 33,044 (D) 123,727 4,087,004 28,496 883,301 2002 26,041 17,468 106,620 2,382,365 22,365 604,808 Cattle and calves .................................................farms, 2007 1,136 7,021 10,898 15,953 10,025 21,438 2002 1,227 5,622 11,972 18,584 10,944 22,938

$1,000, 2007 9,559 576,025 318,080 288,801 856,489 565,746 2002 7,094 533,952 251,121 185,222 625,070 408,242 Milk and other dairy products from cows .............farms, 2007 158 253 5,799 472 410 3,681 2002 138 182 6,681 706 551 4,255

$1,000, 2007 34,091 1,009,671 2,280,218 161,373 78,959 861,632 2002 29,154 730,083 1,560,895 150,406 65,450 551,877 Hogs and pigs ......................................................farms, 2007 381 351 1,817 2,459 351 4,505 2002 378 306 1,490 2,332 474 4,976

$1,000, 2007 2,349 375 28,302 3,104,731 34,910 571,685 2002 2,313 381 14,005 2,183,646 25,888 322,687 Sheep, goats, and their products .........................farms, 2007 1,218 2,577 2,252 3,544 742 4,907 2002 949 904 2,432 2,267 820 4,848

$1,000, 2007 1,784 (D) 10,246 6,632 8,479 14,186 2002 1,482 9,433 9,421 2,960 6,979 9,971 Horses, ponies, mules, burros, and donkeys .............................................................farms, 2007 847 1,354 2,026 2,730 831 3,404 2002 878 1,186 2,200 2,621 972 5,658

$1,000, 2007 33,732 7,856 50,616 17,959 (D) 26,271 2002 18,314 6,600 15,223 15,202 (D) 31,260 Aquaculture (see text) ......................................... farms, 2007 116 16 127 311 4 140 2002 50 19 157 202 6 100

$1,000, 2007 6,637 3,228 20,417 32,175 (D) 6,582 2002 2,223 1,604 15,185 17,669 (D) 3,338 Other animals and other animal products (see text) .............................................farms, 2007 444 304 1,439 1,591 369 2,576 2002 313 170 1,021 683 349 1,707

$1,000, 2007 14,036 2,982 25,101 8,676 33,986 31,088 2002 5,758 3,254 10,235 15,581 20,866 26,471 Value of agricultural products sold directly to individuals for human consumption (see text) ..............................................farms, 2007 1,931 1,529 5,338 3,712 444 6,827 2002 1,769 1,071 4,651 3,054 452 6,205

$1,000, 2007 30,106 11,193 77,464 29,144 2,429 54,270 2002 19,126 6,582 59,724 17,245 1,765 37,217 See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 308 UNITED STATES 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Total sales (see text) - Con.

Value of sales by commodity or commodity group - Con.

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse - Con.

Tobacco .............................................................. farms, 2007 - - 1,151 - 257 2002 - - 893 - 874

$1,000, 2007 - - 28,156 - 73,026 2002 - - 15,413 - 104,521 Cotton and cottonseed ........................................ farms, 2007 421 - - - 456 2002 581 - - - 489

$1,000, 2007 68,169 - - - 46,274 2002 43,685 - - - 33,101 Vegetables, melons, potatoes, and sweet potatoes 1 .......................................................... farms, 2007 842 1,462 4,300 208 1,511 2002 586 1,879 3,779 142 1,080

$1,000, 2007 25,315 339,388 125,623 8,111 126,311 2002 19,276 353,996 125,923 5,527 90,457 Fruits, tree nuts, and berries ............................... farms, 2007 2,204 4,187 3,222 159 1,013 2002 2,078 4,755 2,547 102 1,077

$1,000, 2007 17,543 515,582 151,101 4,483 34,481 2002 11,863 277,745 109,383 2,358 40,003 Nursery, greenhouse, floriculture, and sod (see text) .................................................... farms, 2007 471 2,583 2,719 260 623 2002 578 3,039 3,073 225 771

$1,000, 2007 204,020 989,483 892,279 40,739 227,041 2002 168,259 806,851 732,709 37,593 219,980 Cut Christmas trees and short-rotation woody crops ...................................................... farms, 2007 63 1,320 1,205 49 179 2002 73 1,106 1,326 60 152

$1,000, 2007 785 116,759 22,727 (D) 7,558 2002 636 107,984 31,193 658 2,427 Other crops and hay (see text) ............................ farms, 2007 16,697 8,626 17,525 238 3,893 2002 12,234 8,225 13,818 156 2,933

$1,000, 2007 173,699 698,104 149,392 (D) 69,138 2002 143,166 498,687 103,136 831 21,177 Livestock, poultry, and their products ...................... farms, 2007 54,100 19,757 31,208 444 10,604 2002 58,248 21,030 29,152 305 10,133

$1,000, 2007 4,618,436 1,410,055 3,939,097 10,306 1,554,190 2002 3,637,326 1,000,586 2,936,045 8,408 896,505 Poultry and eggs ................................................. farms, 2007 5,014 3,070 7,885 162 2,090 2002 2,726 2,478 4,028 76 1,113

$1,000, 2007 748,776 119,812 1,015,843 1,908 1,289,876 2002 508,373 86,506 745,624 1,766 694,290 Cattle and calves ................................................. farms, 2007 45,512 13,077 19,784 148 6,782 2002 51,414 13,654 20,571 118 7,139

$1,000, 2007 3,062,020 800,336 556,192 846 105,282 2002 2,448,916 543,231 441,671 735 76,146 Milk and other dairy products from cows ............. farms, 2007 1,022 592 8,407 39 115 2002 989 515 9,146 28 215

$1,000, 2007 191,775 401,786 1,890,190 4,599 52,550 2002 163,006 293,927 1,393,992 3,859 46,240 Hogs and pigs ..................................................... farms, 2007 2,274 1,466 3,440 81 700 2002 2,256 1,558 3,785 51 736

$1,000, 2007 555,521 5,662 336,437 354 77,211 2002 462,849 3,540 269,318 227 61,589 Sheep, goats, and their products ......................... farms, 2007 3,972 3,671 4,462 97 1,363 2002 3,032 3,699 3,425 65 991

$1,000, 2007 12,109 20,987 10,322 168 1,458 2002 6,672 17,397 7,355 104 878 Horses, ponies, mules, burros, and donkeys ............................................................. farms, 2007 4,706 2,578 3,398 30 1,443 2002 5,711 3,918 3,220 36 1,444

$1,000, 2007 36,191 18,935 49,320 313 21,622 2002 33,979 18,960 41,809 436 13,825 Aquaculture (see text) ........................................ farms, 2007 56 96 292 27 93 2002 74 131 267 15 66

$1,000, 2007 3,253 16,270 44,519 1,653 4,775 2002 3,467 17,054 15,325 863 3,173 Other animals and other animal products (see text) ............................................. farms, 2007 778 1,256 2,283 63 578 2002 664 1,176 1,456 40 215

$1,000, 2007 8,792 26,267 36,275 465 1,415 2002 10,064 19,973 20,951 419 363 Value of agricultural products sold directly to individuals for human consumption (see text) .............................................. farms, 2007 3,194 6,274 7,537 249 1,323 2002 1,920 6,383 6,082 180 1,175

$1,000, 2007 11,534 56,362 75,893 6,292 12,660 2002 3,735 21,411 53,760 3,697 8,287 See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA UNITED STATES 309 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Total sales (see text) - Con.

Value of sales by commodity or commodity group - Con.

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse - Con.

Tobacco ...............................................................farms, 2007 - 1,613 - - -

2002 - 8,151 - - -

$1,000, 2007 - 70,634 - - -

2002 - 141,412 - - -

Cotton and cottonseed .........................................farms, 2007 - 779 7,226 - -

2002 - 920 8,866 - -

$1,000, 2007 - 147,468 1,885,146 - -

2002 - 178,354 1,088,675 - -

Vegetables, melons, potatoes, and sweet potatoes 1 ...........................................................farms, 2007 140 1,483 2,348 532 506 2002 158 1,601 2,527 347 422

$1,000, 2007 3,464 71,870 373,704 16,092 13,192 2002 5,192 68,516 298,997 13,620 10,140 Fruits, tree nuts, and berries ................................farms, 2007 61 327 7,033 615 499 2002 43 718 7,496 460 325

$1,000, 2007 412 2,552 219,819 17,022 15,875 2002 (D) 6,363 114,822 6,162 9,270 Nursery, greenhouse, floriculture, and sod (see text) .....................................................farms, 2007 121 1,517 1,958 254 437 2002 119 2,323 2,137 275 418

$1,000, 2007 19,984 325,079 862,183 128,626 24,795 2002 18,350 282,815 704,699 92,646 22,803 Cut Christmas trees and short-rotation woody crops .......................................................farms, 2007 19 177 254 33 255 2002 14 202 310 26 252

$1,000, 2007 202 2,018 7,606 342 3,448 2002 (D) 2,312 6,541 103 2,372 Other crops and hay (see text) ............................farms, 2007 6,579 14,786 45,419 5,505 3,050 2002 6,573 14,741 30,044 3,986 2,710

$1,000, 2007 121,272 31,438 744,302 151,418 36,513 2002 145,766 47,896 418,557 115,127 24,231 Livestock, poultry, and their products ......................farms, 2007 17,573 47,350 145,480 9,271 3,395 2002 19,625 51,367 148,859 8,059 3,161

$1,000, 2007 3,186,953 1,469,608 14,435,499 1,043,281 574,451 2002 2,258,715 1,127,266 10,402,993 858,101 401,482 Poultry and eggs ..................................................farms, 2007 977 4,369 12,747 1,133 1,001 2002 451 2,554 6,319 645 571

$1,000, 2007 140,798 572,866 2,113,086 140,359 10,996 2002 70,820 359,286 1,260,951 84,178 5,875 Cattle and calves .................................................farms, 2007 15,171 38,961 116,626 6,257 1,937 2002 17,060 42,017 125,518 5,617 2,104

$1,000, 2007 2,307,618 633,303 10,503,774 347,299 57,581 2002 1,693,838 499,143 8,083,024 371,418 45,106 Milk and other dairy products from cows .............farms, 2007 672 1,115 1,268 422 1,222 2002 982 1,048 1,162 451 1,393

$1,000, 2007 279,765 180,503 1,245,441 292,141 493,926 2002 156,498 173,410 676,703 196,812 342,440 Hogs and pigs ......................................................farms, 2007 1,042 1,160 4,053 630 239 2002 1,738 1,130 3,962 480 206

$1,000, 2007 381,360 33,797 237,504 196,595 697 2002 (D) 42,632 128,231 153,112 374 Sheep, goats, and their products .........................farms, 2007 1,829 3,839 18,416 1,699 645 2002 2,074 3,331 15,314 1,372 436

$1,000, 2007 36,697 6,712 107,807 23,377 3,851 2002 31,285 4,196 94,164 17,804 1,581 Horses, ponies, mules, burros, and donkeys .............................................................farms, 2007 1,408 5,149 14,107 1,610 266 2002 1,850 6,847 15,477 1,725 235

$1,000, 2007 8,884 31,212 117,744 10,020 2,454 2002 (D) 38,201 91,567 7,776 2,853 Aquaculture (see text) ......................................... farms, 2007 12 106 275 27 23 2002 10 197 392 41 26

$1,000, 2007 3,108 4,893 46,102 4,074 1,989 2002 (D) 4,799 31,058 5,746 1,325 Other animals and other animal products (see text) .............................................farms, 2007 351 1,494 4,211 543 332 2002 313 977 2,404 308 258

$1,000, 2007 28,723 6,322 64,042 29,415 2,957 2002 23,179 5,599 37,295 21,255 1,927 Value of agricultural products sold directly to individuals for human consumption (see text) ..............................................farms, 2007 752 3,581 8,619 1,584 1,474 2002 713 3,392 8,459 1,115 1,163

$1,000, 2007 6,158 15,380 38,696 10,098 22,863 2002 3,789 11,227 25,639 6,983 9,567 See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued 310 UNITED STATES 2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Table 2. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Direct Sales: 2007 and 2002 - Con.

[For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text]

Item Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Total sales (see text) - Con.

Value of sales by commodity or commodity group - Con.

Crops, including nursery and greenhouse - Con.

Tobacco .............................................................. farms, 2007 892 - 70 195 -

2002 4,163 - 530 452 -

$1,000, 2007 68,073 - 758 3,400 -

2002 112,503 - 3,413 6,111 -

Cotton and cottonseed ........................................ farms, 2007 196 - - - -

2002 312 - - - -

$1,000, 2007 25,203 - - - -

2002 20,718 - - - -

Vegetables, melons, potatoes, and sweet potatoes 1 .......................................................... farms, 2007 1,619 2,082 712 3,320 48 2002 1,303 2,041 411 2,957 28

$1,000, 2007 93,988 809,963 5,811 422,639 3,501 2002 79,345 805,567 4,613 341,615 1,798 Fruits, tree nuts, and berries ............................... farms, 2007 1,358 5,988 365 1,719 22 2002 1,251 6,215 404 1,331 11

$1,000, 2007 68,193 2,081,031 14,206 218,248 (D) 2002 40,954 1,354,238 11,443 107,972 87 Nursery, greenhouse, floriculture, and sod (see text) .................................................... farms, 2007 1,040 1,472 323 1,635 56 2002 1,241 1,883 371 1,487 50

$1,000, 2007 248,153 327,046 23,371 244,216 6,339 2002 218,698 391,930 26,849 197,439 5,301 Cut Christmas trees and short-rotation woody crops ...................................................... farms, 2007 352 534 173 849 3 2002 514 508 184 859 4

$1,000, 2007 6,949 23,225 935 17,822 (D) 2002 9,633 26,270 1,182 23,412 41 Other crops and hay (see text) ............................ farms, 2007 10,432 6,900 7,771 21,691 3,166 2002 9,156 6,399 4,378 16,449 2,298

$1,000, 2007 77,961 554,702 21,267 119,660 130,888 2002 78,384 422,822 12,618 120,249 86,027 Livestock, poultry, and their products ...................... farms, 2007 27,744 17,178 14,261 39,619 6,797 2002 29,060 14,372 11,616 38,793 6,433

$1,000, 2007 2,047,887 2,037,958 513,357 6,298,032 943,728 2002 1,642,692 1,747,922 413,121 3,933,204 726,111 Poultry and eggs ................................................. farms, 2007 3,790 3,810 2,434 7,058 610 2002 2,140 1,540 995 3,110 254

$1,000, 2007 971,851 228,825 301,708 375,284 997 2002 750,035 143,962 250,922 224,968 663 Cattle and calves ................................................. farms, 2007 21,884 9,521 10,474 30,193 4,880 2002 23,970 8,979 9,513 31,807 4,997

$1,000, 2007 574,506 716,720 164,962 1,014,553 801,833 2002 471,703 709,585 117,967 834,895 643,123 Milk and other dairy products from cows ............. farms, 2007 1,173 823 161 14,270 32 2002 1,253 884 395 16,972 81

$1,000, 2007 330,344 873,365 31,386 4,573,294 22,331 2002 275,402 634,908 32,202 2,651,018 7,473 Hogs and pigs ..................................................... farms, 2007 964 1,596 1,042 3,516 368 2002 834 1,067 717 3,245 247

$1,000, 2007 56,960 5,921 2,089 100,309 41,923 2002 72,213 6,803 1,992 79,836 23,057 Sheep, goats, and their products ......................... farms, 2007 2,951 2,762 1,860 3,212 1,004 2002 2,278 1,971 1,397 2,456 1,019

$1,000, 2007 7,710 6,738 3,241 17,141 34,292 2002 6,030 4,902 2,168 10,545 28,853 Horses, ponies, mules, burros, and donkeys ............................................................. farms, 2007 2,247 2,938 1,291 2,845 1,967 2002 3,007 2,698 891 2,949 1,555

$1,000, 2007 46,876 26,134 4,476 12,873 24,631 2002 40,581 18,599 3,787 14,986 12,400 Aquaculture (see text) ........................................ farms, 2007 182 355 39 169 20 2002 182 334 50 208 17

$1,000, 2007 53,032 162,867 3,478 14,182 7,157 2002 19,945 215,130 2,712 14,262 3,213 Other animals and other animal products (see text) ............................................. farms, 2007 1,293 1,398 737 1,640 225 2002 682 798 390 1,216 174

$1,000, 2007 6,606 17,388 2,017 190,395 10,564 2002 6,782 14,033 1,372 102,694 7,329 Value of agricultural products sold directly to individuals for human consumption (see text) .............................................. farms, 2007 2,855 5,418 1,990 6,243 645 2002 2,513 4,527 1,434 4,918 521

$1,000, 2007 28,878 43,537 7,097 43,491 3,025 2002 16,825 34,753 4,588 29,072 2,381 1

2002 data do not include potatoes, sweet potatoes, or ginseng.

2007 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE - STATE DATA UNITED STATES 311 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on March 22, 2010, I posted San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peaces Hearing Request and Petition to Intervene and San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peaces Petition for Waiver of 10 C.F.R. Part 51 Subpart A Appendix B and 10 C.F.R. § 51.53(C)(2) on the NRCs Electronic Information Exchange. It is my understanding that as a result, the following persons were served:

Office of the Secretary David A. Repka, Esq.

Rules and Adjudications Branch Tyson R. Smith, Esq.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Winston & Strawn, LLP 11555 Rockville Pike 1700 K Street N.W.

Rockville, MD 20852 Washington, D.C. 20006-3817 hearingdocket@nrc.gov drepka@winston.com, trsmith@winston.com Susan Uttal, Esq. E. Roy Hawkens Lloyd Subin, Esq. Chief Administrative Judge Office of General Counsel Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop O-15D21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555 Roy.Hawkens@nrc.gov Susan.Uttal@nrc.gov Lloyd.Subin@nrc.gov Electronically signed by Diane Curran