ML090980297

Letter from Sean O'Kelly Annual Report for the University of Texas at Austin

ML090980297
Person / Time
Site:	University of Texas at Austin
Issue date:	03/31/2009
From:	O'Kelly S University of Texas at Austin
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML090980297 (46)

Text

Department of Mechanical Engineering THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory

• Austin, Texas 78758

• 512-232-5370 FAX 512-471-4589 - http//www.me.utexas.edu/-netl/net.html March 31, 2009 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington D. C. 20555

Subject:

Annual Report for The University of Texas at Austin, Docket 50-602

Dear Sir:

Enclosed is the 2008 Annual Report for the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory at The University of Texas at Austin. This report is being submitted in accordance with Section 6.6 of the Technical Specifications.

Please contact me at 512-232-5373 if you have any questions.

Sincerely, Sean O'Kelly NETL Associate Director Enclo &8Annual 20 Report cc: A. s, DRI TR Project Manager NI spondence 2008 Annual Report

- ý7QDJD

The University of Texas at Austin Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 2008 Annual Report NRC Docket 50-602 DOE Contract No. DE-AC07-05ID14517

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 2

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Tables of Contents 1 Executive Summary 2 Forward 3 1.0 Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 6 1.1 Introduction 6 Purpose of the Report Availability of the Facility Operating Regulations NETL History 1.2 NETL Building 8 J.J. Pickle Research Campus NETL Building Description Laboratories, Equipment 1.3 UT-TRIGA Mark II Research Reactor 10 Reactor Description Experiment Facilities Beam Port Facilities 1.4 Nuclear Engineering Academic Program 16 1.5 NETL Divisions 18 Operations and Maintenance Laboratory Operations Health Physics 2.0 Annual Progress Report 22 2.1 Faculty, Staff, and Students 2.2 Education and Training Activities 2.3 Research and Development Projects 2.4 Publications, Reports, and Papers 3.0 Facility Operating Summaries 32 3.1 Operating Experience 3.2 Reactor Shutdowns 3.3 Utilization 3.4 Maintenance 3.5 Facility Changes 3.6 Laboratory Inspections 3.7 Radiation Exposures 3.8 Radiation Surveys 3.9 Radioactive Effluents, Radioactive Waste 3

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

The Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory (NETL) facility continues to support the academic and research missions of The University of Texas but also provides these support functions to other institutions. The Nuclear Renaissance has increased the number of nuclear engineering programs in the United States and significantly increased the number of students within those departments. The NETL facility and its TRIGA reactor represent an important investment in national nuclear education infrastructure.

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory FORWARD The mission of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory at The University of Texas at Austin is to:

• Educate the next generation of leaders in nuclear science and engineering.

• Conduct leading research at the forefront of the international nuclear community.

• Apply nuclear technology for solving multidisciplinary problems.

e Provide service to the citizens of Texas, the U.S., and the international community.

This objective is achieved by carrying out a well-balanced program of education, research, aid service. The NETL research reactor supports hands-on education in reactor physics and nuclear science. In addition, students in non-nuclear fields such as physics, chemistry, and biology use the reactor in laboratory course work. It may also be used in education programs for nuclear power plant personnel, secondary schools students and teachers, and the general public.

The NETL research reactor benefits a wide range of on-campus and off-campus users, including academic, medical, industrial, and government organizations. The principal services offered by our reactor involve material irradiation, trace element detection, material analysis, and radiographic analysis of objects and processes. Such services establish beneficial links to off-campus users, expose faculty and students to multi-disciplinary research and commercial applications of nuclear science, and earn revenues to help support Nuclear Engineering activities.

Steven Biegalski Director Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 5

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 1.0 NUCLEAR ENGINEERING TEACHING LABORATORY 1.1 Introduction Purpose of the Report The Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory (NETL) at The University of Texas at Austin prepares an annual report of program activities to comply with requirements of the nuclear reactor license and the Department of Energy's fuel assistance program. Information in this report provides an introduction to the education, research, and service programs of the NETL. A TRIGA nuclear reactor is the major experimental facility at the Laboratory. The reactor operates at power levels up to 1000 kilowatts or with pulse reactivity insertions up to 2.2% Ak/k.

Figure 1-1 NETL - Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory The annual report satisfies requirements of the University Fuel Assistance Program, U.S.

Department of Energy (DOE) [contract number DE-AC07-05ID14517, Subcontract 00078206],

and the licensing agency, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) [docket number 50-602]. This annual report covers the period from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008.

6

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Availability of the Facility The NETL facility serves a multipurpose role. The use of NETL by faculty, staff, and students in the College of Engineering is the Laboratory's primary function. In addition, the development and application of nuclear methods are done to assist researchers from other universities, industry, and government. NETL provides services to industry, government and other laboratories for the testing and evaluation of materials. Public education through tours and demonstrations are also routine functions of the laboratory operation.

Operating Regulations Licensing of activities at NETL involve both Federal and State agencies. The nuclear reactor is subject to the terms and specifications of Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

License R-129, a class 104c research reactor license. Another NRC license, SNM-180, for special nuclear material, provides for the use of a subcritical assembly with neutron sources.

Both licenses are responsibilities of the NETL. For general use of radioisotopes the university maintains a broad license with the State of Texas, L00485. Functions of the broad license are the responsibility of the University Office of Environmental Health and Safety.

NETL History Development of the nuclear engineering program was an effort of both physics and engineering faculty during the late 1950's and early 1960's. The program became part of the Mechanical Engineering Department where it remains to this day. The program installed, operated, and dismantled a TRIGA nuclear reactor at a site on the main campus in the engineering building, Taylor Hall. Initial criticality for the first UT reactor was August 1963 with the final operation in April 1988. Power at startup was 10 kilowatts (1963) with one power upgrade to 250 kilowatts (1968). The total bumup during a 25 year period from 1963 to 1988 was 26.1 megawatt-days. Pulse capability of the reactor was 1.4% Ak/k with a total of 476 pulses during the operating history. Dismantling and decommissioning of the facility were completed in December 1992.

Planning for a new facility, which led to the shutdown of the campus facility, began in October 1983, with construction commencing in December 1986 and continuing until May 1989.

The final license was issued in January 1992, and initial criticality occurred on March 12, 1992.

7

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory The new facility, including support laboratories, administrative offices, and the reactor is the central location for all NETL activities.

Land use in the area of the NETL site began as an industrial site during the 1940's.

Following the 1950's, lease agreements between the University and the Federal government led to .the creation of the Balcones Research Center. In the 1990's, the University became owner of the site, and in 1994 the site name was changed to the J.J. Pickle Research Campus to honor retired U.S. Congressman James "Jake" Pickle.

1.2 NETL Building J.J. Pickle Research Campus The J.J. Pickle Research Campus (PRC) is a multidiscipline research campus with a site area of 1.87 square kilometers. Areas of the site consist of two approximately equal east and west tracts of land. An area of about 9000 square meters on the east tract is the location of the NETL building. Sixteen separate research units and at least five other academic research programs, including the NETL facility, have research efforts with locations at the research campus. Adjacent to-the NETL site is the Center for Research in Water Resources and Bureau of Economic Geology, which are examples of the diverse research activities on the campus. A Commons Building provides cafeteria service, recreation areas, meeting rooms, and conference facilities. Access to the NETL site is shown in Figure 1-2.

fi ROAD a- -----

BUREAUOF ECONOMIC aI CONO N.E.T.L. 0 REPOBITORY I Research CENTER FOR ELECTRO-MAGNETICS ENR0 CENTE FORRESEARCH CENTER RESOURCES IN WATER.

6TUDIES L Figure 1-2 NETL Site - J.J. Pickle Research Campus 8

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory NETL Building Description The NETL building is a 1950 sq meter (21,000 sq ft), facility with laboratory and office spaces. Building areas consist of two primary laboratories of 330 sq m (3.600 sq ft) and 80 sq m (900 sq ft), eight support laboratories (217 sq m, 2340 sq ft), and six supplemental areas (130 sq m, 1430 sq ft). Conference and office space is allocated to 12 rooms totaling 244 sq m (2570 sq ft). One of the primary laboratories contains the TRIGA reactor pool, biological shield structure, and the neutron beam experiment areas. A second primary laboratory consists of 1.3 meter (4.25 ft) thick walls for use as a general purpose radiation experiment facility. Other areas of the building include support shops, instrument laboratories, measurement laboratories, and material handling laboratories.

Laboratories, Equipment The NETL facility makes available several types of radiation facilities and an array of radiation detection equipment. In addition to the reactor, facilities include a subcritical assembly, a gamma irradiator, various radioisotope sources, and several radiation producing machines.

Neutron sources of plutonium-beryllium and californium-252 are available. A subcritical assembly of 20% enriched uranium in a polyethylene moderated cylinder provides an experimental device for laboratory demonstrations of neutron multiplication and neutron flux measurements. A full critical loading of fuel from the Manhattan College Zero Power Reactor is currently available for subcritical experiments.

Laboratories provide locations to setup radiation experiments, test instrumentation, prepare materials for irradiation, process radioactive samples and experiment with radiochemical reactions.

9

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 1.3 UT-TRIGA MARK II Research Reactor The TRIGA Mark II nuclear reactor at the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory of The University of Texas at Austin is an above-ground, fixed-core research reactor. The nuclear core, containing uranium fuel, is located at the bottom of an 8.2 meter deep water-filled tank surrounded by a concrete shield structure. The highly purified water in the tank serves as the reactor coolant, neutron moderator, and a transparent radiation shield. Visual and physical access to the core is possible at all times. The TRIGA Mark II reactor is a versatile and inherently safe research reactor conceived and developed by General Atomics to meet the requirements of education and research. The UT-TRIGA research reactor provides sufficient power and neutron flux for comprehensive and productive work in many fields including physics, chemistry, engineering, medicine, and metallurgy. The word TRIGA stands for Training, Research, Isotope production, General Atomics.

Figure 1-3, Reactor Tank and Biological Shield 10

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Reactor Description Reactor Operation. The UT-TRIGA research reactor can operate continuously at nominal powers up to 1 MW, or in the pulsing mode where typical peak powers of 1500 MW can be achieved for durations of about 10 msec. The UT-TRIGA with its digital control system provides a unique facility for performing reactor physics experiments as well as reactor operator training. The pulsing operation is particularly useful in the study of reactor kinetics and control.

Neutrons produced in the reactor core can be used in a wide variety of research applications including nuclear reaction studies, neutron scattering experiments, and nuclear analytical and irradiation services.

Special neutron facilities include a rotary specimen rack, which is located in the reactor graphite reflector, a pneumatically operated "rabbit" transfer system, whichpenetrates the reactor core, and a central thimble, which allows samples to be inserted into the peak flux region of the core. Cylindrical voids in the concrete shield structure, called neutron beam ports, allow neutrons to stream out away from the core. Experiments may be done inside the beam ports or outside the concrete shield in the neutron beams.

Nuclear Core. The reactor core is an assembly of about 100 fuel elements surrounded by an annular graphite neutron reflector. Each element consists of a fuel region capped at top and bottom with a graphite section, all contained within a thin-walled stainless steel tube. The fuel region is a metallic alloy of low-enriched uranium evenly distributed in zirconium hydride (UZrH). The physical properties of the TRIGA fuel provide an inherently safe operation. Rapid power transients to high powers are automatically suppressed without using mechanical control; the reactor quickly returns to normal power levels. Pulse operation, which is a normal mode of operation, is a practical demonstration of this inherent safety feature.

Reactor Reflector. The aluminum-canned graphite neutron reflector surrounding the reactor was flooded in 2000 by the NETL staff to correct pressurization problems. The reflector was replaced in 2004 with slight modification.

11

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Reactor Control. The instrumentation for the UT-TRIGA research reactor is contained in a compact microprocessor-driven control system. This advanced system provides for flexible and efficient operation with precise power and flux control. It also allows permanent retention of all pertinent data. The power level of theUT-TRIGA is controlled by four control rods. Three of these rods, one regulating and two shim, are sealed stainless steel tubes containing powdered boron carbide followed by UZrH. As these rods are withdrawn, boron (a neutron absorber) leaves the core and UZrH (fuel) enters the core, increasing power. The fourth control rod, the transient rod, is a solid cylinder of borated graphite followed by air, clad in aluminum, and operated by pneumatic pressure to permit pulse operation. The sudden ejection of the transient rod produces an immediate burst of power.

(b A-I C -1I i .7 Figure 1-4 TRIGA Reactor Detail 12

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Experiment Facilities The experimental and irradiation facilities of the TRIGA Mark II reactor are extensive and versatile. Experimental tubes can easily be installed in the core region to provide facilities for high-level irradiations or small in-core experiments. Areas outside the core and reflector are available for large experiment equipment or facilities.

The reactor is equipped with a central thimble for access to the point of maximum flux in the core. The central thimble consists of an aluminum tube that fits through the center hole of the top and bottom grid plates. Experiments with the central thimble include irradiation of small samples and the exposure of materials to a collimated beam of neutrons or gamma rays.

A rotary multiple-position specimen rack located in a well in the top of the graphite reflector provides for batch production of radioisotopes and for the activation and irradiation of multiple samples. When rotated, all forty positions in the rack are exposed to neutron fluxes of the same intensity. Samples are loaded from the top of the reactor through a tube into the rotary rack using a specimen lifting device. A rack design feature provides pneumatic pressure for insertion and removal of samples from the sample rack positions.

A pneumatic transfer system permits applications with short-lived radioisotopes. The in-core terminus of the system is normally located in the outer ring of fuel element positions, a region of high neutron flux. The sample capsule (rabbit) is conveyed to a sender-receiver station via pressure differences in the tubing system. An optional transfer box permits the sample to be sent and received from one to three different sender-receiver, stations.

Special cadmium-lined facilities have been constructed that utilize an internal area of the core created by removing three to seven fuel elements.

Beam Port Facilities Five neutron beam ports penetrate the concrete biological shield and reactor water tank at core level. These beam ports were designed with different characteristics to accommodate a wide variety of experiments. Specimens may be placed inside a beam port or outside the beam port in a neutron beam from the beam port. When a beam port is not in use, special shielding reduces the radiation levels outside the concrete biological shield to safe values. This shielding consists of an inner shield plug, outer shield plug, lead-filled shutter, and circular steel cover plate.

13

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Beam Port (BP) #1 is connected to BP #5, end to end, to form a through beam port. The through beam port penetrates the graphite reflector tangential to the reactor core, as seen in Figure 1-6. This configuration allows introduction of specimens adjacent to the reactor core to gain access to a high neutron flux, allows access from either side of the concrete biological shield, and can provide beams of thermal neutrons with relatively low fast-neutron and gamma-ray contamination.

Beam Port #2 is a tangential beam port, terminating at the outer edge of the reflector.

However, a void in the graphite reflector extends the effective source of neutrons into the reflector to provide a thermal neutron beam with minimum fast-neutron and gamma-ray backgrounds. The beam port was recently configured to provide neutron depth profiling applications and potential thermal prompt neutron capabilities.

Beam Port #3 is a radial beam port. The beam port pierces the graphite reflector and terminates at the inner edge of the reflector. This beam port permits access to a position adjacent to the reactor core, and can provide a neutron beam with relatively high fast-neutron and gamma-ray fluxes. Beam Port #3 contains the Texas Cold Neutron Source Facility.

Beam Port #4 is a radial beam port which also terminates at the outer edge of the reflector. A void in the graphite reflector extends the effective source of neutrons to the reactor core. This configuration is useful for neutron-beam experiments which require neutron energies higher than thermal energies. Beam Port #4 was configured in 2005 to provide student laboratories.

A neutron beam coming from a beam port may be modified by using collimators, moderators and neutron filters. Collimators are used to limit beam size and beam divergence.

Moderators are used to change the energy of neutron beams (e.g., cold moderator). Filters allow neutrons in selected energy intervals to pass through while attenuating neutrons with other energies.

14

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Table 1-1 Physical Dimensions of Standard Beam Ports Beam Port Port Diameter BP#1, BP#2, BP#4 At Core: 6 in. 15.24 cm At Exit: 8 in. 20.32 cm BP #3, BP#5 At Core: 6 in. 15.24 cm 8 in. 20.32 cm 10 in. 25.40 cm At Exit: 16 in. 40.64 cm BP#3 BP #4 BP #5

~II1 BP #1 Figure 1-5 Beam Ports 15

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 1.4 Nuclear Engineering Academic Program The Nuclear Engineering Program (NE) at The University of Texas at Austin is located within the Mechanical Engineering Department. The Program's undergraduate degree is the Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering, Nuclear Engineering Option. It is best described as a major in Mechanical Engineering with a minor in Nuclear Engineering. As such, all Mechanical Engineering degree requirements must be met.

The Program's graduate degrees are completely autonomous; they are Master of Science in Engineering (Concentration in Nuclear Engineering) and Doctor of Philosophy (Concentration in Nuclear Engineering). Course requirements for these degrees and the qualifying examination for the Ph.D. are separate and distinct from other areas of Mechanical Engineering. A Dissertation Proposal and Defense of Dissertation are also required for the Ph.D. degree and are acted on by a NE dissertation committee.

Of the five undergraduate Nuclear Engineering courses and the dozen graduate Nuclear Engineering courses, five courses make extensive use of the reactor facility. Table 1-3 lists the courses that use the reactor and its experiment facilities.

Table 1-3 Nuclear Engineering Courses Undergraduate ME 361F Instrumentation and Methods ME 361G Reactor Operations and Control ME 177K Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Concepts Graduate ME 388R.3 Kinetics and Dynamics of Nuclear Systems ME 3 89R. 1 Nuclear Engineering Laboratory ME 389R.2 Nuclear Analytical Measurement Techniques ME 397M Radioactive Waste Management ME 337D Radiation and Radiation Protection In addition to these formal classes the NETL often provides short, one day short courses or tours for Texas agencies, high schools and the Boy Scouts of America. The NETL has 16

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory participated in the IAEA Fellowship programs for over ten years. Several Fellows and Visiting Scientists spend 3-6 months at the NETL per year.

17

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 1.5 NETL Divisions The Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory operates as a unit of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas. Figure 1-8 shows the responsibility line organization of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory. The staff includes the Health Physics and Reactor Operations to support the Experimenter and Users groups and to insure compliance with all licensed activities.

The Operation and Maintenance Division (OMD) is responsible for the safe and effective operations of the TRIGA nuclear reactor. Activities of OMD include neutron and gamma irradiation service, operator/engineering training courses, and teaching reactor short courses.

Figure 1-6 NETL Staff Organization 18

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Reactor Operations and Maintenance The role of these individuals is the routine maintenance and safe operation of the TRIGA Mark II Research Reactor. With the assistance of the NETL licensed operators, Health Physicists and Electronics Technician this division performs most of the work necessary to meet the Technical Specifications of the reactor license. Personnel implement modifications to reactor systems and furnish design assistance for new experiment systems. The reactor operators may operate standard reactor experiment facilities.

Services provided to other divisions at the laboratory include assistance in the areas of initial experiment design, fabrication, and setup. Maintenance, repair support, and inventory control of computer, electronic, and mechanical equipment is also provided. Building systems maintenance is also coordinated by the OMD. Other activities include scheduling and coordination of facility tours.

Laboratory and Research Activities The principal objectives of the Laboratory research staff involve support of the research and educational missions of the university at large. Elemental measurements using instrumental neutron activation analysis provide nuclear analytical support for individual projects ranging from student project support for classes to measurements for faculty research projects. Project support is in the areas of engineering, chemistry, physics, geology, biology, zoology, and other areas. Research project support includes elemental measurements for routine environmental and innovative research projects. In the area of education, the division, with available state-of-the-art equipment, helps stimulate the interest of students to consider studies in the areas of science and engineering. Education in the irradiation and measurement of radioactivity is presented to college, high school and other student groups in class demonstrations or on a one-on-one basis.

The neutron activation analysis technique is made available to different state agencies to assist with quality control of sample measurements. Analysis of samples for the presence of various elements and measurements of environmental effects assists detection of toxic elements.

Radiation measurement systems available include several high purity germanium detectors with relative efficiencies ranging from 20 to 40%. The detectors are coupled to several Canberra and ORTEC PC-based systems. Two of the detectors are equipped with an automatic sample changer for full-time (i.e., 24 hrs a day) utilization of the counting equipment. Two 19

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory detectors operate as a Compton Gamma Ray Suppression System that provides improved low background measurements. A PC based acquisition and analysis system supports the analysis of Compton Suppression spectra and short half-life nuclear reaction.

The group also manages the use of the five beam ports. Experiments at the beam ports may be permanent systems which function for periods in excess of one or two years or temporary systems. Temporary systems function once or for a few months, and generally require removal and replacement as part of the setup and shutdown process. The reactor bay contains floor space for each of the beam ports. Available beam paths range from 6 meters (20 ft) to 12 meters (40 ft). The objectives of the research function are to apply nuclear methods at the forefront of modern technology and to investigate fundamental issues related to nuclear physics and condensed matter. Another mission of the division is to obtain new, funded research programs to promote the capabilities of the neutron beam projects division for academic, government and industrial organizations and/or groups.

The Laboratory Manager is responsible for coordinating all phases of a project, beginning with the proposal and design, proceeding to the fabrication and testing, and concluding with the operation, evaluation and dismantlement. Projects available at NETL are the Texas Cold Neutron Source, Neutron Depth Profiling, Neutron Guide and Focusing System, Prompt Gamma Activation Analysis, Neutron Radiography and Texas Intense Positron Source.

The Laboratory Management group is also responsible for radiation safety and protection of personnel at the NETL as well as the protection of the general public. The laws mandated by Federal and State government agencies are enforced at the facility through various measures. Health physics procedures have been developed that are facility-specific to ensure that all operations comply with the regulations. Periodic monitoring for radiation and contamination assures that the use of the reactor and radioactive nuclides is conducted safely with no hazard to personnel outside of the facility. Personnel exposures are always maintained ALARA ("as low as is reasonably achievable"). This practice is consistent with the mission of the NETL. Collateral duties of the Health Physics group include the inventory and monitoring of hazardous materials, and environmental health.

The Laboratory and Health Physics group consists of one full time Health Physicist/Nuclear Laboratory Manager with part-time student support. The Health Physicist is functionally responsible to the Management of the NETL and the Department Chairman, but maintains a reporting relationship to the University Radiation Safety Office. This arrangement 20

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory allows the Health Physicist to operate independent of NETL operations constraints to insure that safety is not compromised. One or more part-time Undergraduate Research Assistant (URA) may assist as Health Physics Technicians. The URA reports to the Health Physicist and assists with technical tasks including periodic surveys, equipment maintenance, equipment calibration, and record keeping.

The Laboratory Safety Group provides radiation monitoring, personnel exposure monitoring, and educational activities. Personnel for whom permanent dosimeters are required must attend an eight hour course given by the Health Physicist. This course covers basic radiation principles including general safety practices, and facility-specific procedures and rules.

Each trainee is given a guided tour of the facility to familiarize him with emergency equipment and to reinforce safety/emergency procedures. The group supports University educational activities through assistance to student experimenters in their projects by demonstration of the proper radiation work techniques and controls. The Health Physics group participates in emergency planning between NETL and the City of Austin to provide basic response requirements and conducts off-site radiation safety training to emergency response personnel such as the Hazardous Materials Division of the Fire Department, and Emergency Medical Services crews.

21

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 2.0 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 2.1 Faculty, Staff, and Students Organization. The University administrative structure overseeing the NETL program is presented in Figure 2-1. A description follows, including titles and names of personnel, of the administration and committees that set policy important to NETL.

Figure 2 University Administrative Structure over NETL Administration. The University of Texas at Austin is one campus of 15 campuses of the University of Texas System. As the flagship campus, UT Austin consists of 16 separate colleges and schools. The College of Engineering consists of six engineering departments with separate degree programs. NETL is one of several education and research functions within the college.

22

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Table 2-1 and Table 2-2 list The University of Texas System Board of Regents which is the governing organization and the pertinent administrative officials of The University of Texas at Austin.

Table 2-1 The University of Texas System Board of Regents Chairpersons for 2008 Chairman H. Scott Caven, Jr.

Vice Chairman James R. Huffines Vice Chairman Robert B. Rowling Executive Secretary Francie A. Frederick UT System Chancellor Francisco G. Cigarroa, M.D.

Table 2-2 The University of Texas at Austin Administration President William Powers, Jr.

Executive Vice President and Provost ad interim Steven W. Leslie Dean of College of Engineering Gregory L. Fenves Chairman of Department of Mechanical Engineering Joseph J. Beaman 23

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Radiation Safety Committee. The Radiation Safety Committee convenes to review radiological safety practices at the University during each academic term. The committee composition is shown in Table 2-3. Committee general responsibilities are review of activities of University research programs that utilize radiation source materials.

Table 2-3 2008 Radiation Safety Committee Chair G. Hoffmann Vice-Chair J. M. Sanchez Member N.E. Armstrong Member J. Robertus Member B.G. Sanders Member D. J. O'Kelly Member K. Dalby Ex-Officio member S. Pennington Ex-Officio Member G. R. Harkins Nuclear Reactor Committee. The Nuclear Reactor Committee convenes to review the activities related to facility operation during each quarter of the calendar year. The committee composition is shown in Table 2-4. Committee general responsibilities are review of reactor operation and associated activities.

Table 2-4 Nuclear Reactor Committee Chairman H. M. Liljestrand Member S. Biegalski Member L. Katz Member E. Schneider Member S. Pennington Ex officio member J. Beaman Ex officio member J. G. Ekerdt Ex officio member D. J. O'Kelly Ex officio member M. Krause Ex officio member D. S. O'Kelly 24

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Table 2-5 NETL Personnel NETL Facility Staff Director S. Biegalski Associate Director D. S. O'Kelly Reactor Supervisor M.G. Krause Laboratory and Safety Manager D. J O'Kelly Electronics Technician/Reactor Operator L. Welch Reactor Operators H. Fuentes Health Physics Technician J. Sims Administrative Associate D. Judson NRE Faculty S. Biegalski D.E. Klein M. Dienert E. Schneider S. Landsberger 25

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Funding. NETL funding is provided by state appropriations, research grants, and service activities. Research funding supplements the base budget provided by the State and is obtained mostly through the process of competitive project proposals. Funds from service activities supplement the base funds to allow the facility to provide quality data acquisition and analysis capabilities. Both sources of supplemental funds, research projects and service activities, contribute to the education and research environment for students.

Education and Training Activities Tours and special projects are available to promote public awareness of nuclear energy issues. Tours of the NETL facility are routine activities of NETL staff and students. A typical tour is a general presentation for high school and civic organizations. Other tours given special consideration are demonstrations for interest groups such as physics, chemistry and science groups.

Visitor groups were given access to the facility during the reporting period but in reduced numbers due to security changes implemented since 2001. The total includes tour groups, official visitors, and facility maintenance personnel. The number of tours has decreased over the past several years due to security checks and access restrictions. Tours for 15 groups with an average 20 persons/group were taken through the facility during the reporting period. The NETL typically hosts three international visitors on JAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)

Fellowships a year.

26

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 2.3 Research Acitivities Beam Port 2 Area Neutron Depth Profiling and Prompt Gamma Activation System Beam Port 2 is a tangential beam and this results in a "softer" energy neutron beam because the beam is resulting only from scattered reactor neutrons. The thermal neutron energies have been optimized by installing a sapphire neutron energy filter in the beam. Current projects in development include a neutron depth profiling system and a thermal prompt gamma activation analysis system as an installed co-experiment sharing the neutron beam.

Texas Cold Neutron Source The Texas Cold Neutron Source. (TCNS) is located in one of the radial beam ports (BP

1. 3) and consists of a cold source system and a neutron guide system. The facility was originally constructed using Texas Advance Research Program funding but later improvements were funded by the Department of Energy or using internal NETL sources.

The cold source system includes a cooled moderator, a heat pipe, a cryogenic refrigerator, a vacuum jacket, and connecting lines. Eighty milliliters of mesitylene moderator is maintained by the cold source system at -36 K in a chamber within the reactor graphite reflector.

Mesitylene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, was selected for the cold moderator because it has been shown to be an effective and safe cold moderator. The moderator chamber for the mesitylene is a 7.5 cm diameter right-circular cylinder 2.0 cm thick. The neon heat pipe (properly called thermosyphon) is a 3-m long aluminum tube which is used for cooling the moderator chamber.

The heat pipe contains neon as the working fluid that evaporates at the moderator chamber and condenses at the cold head.

Cold neutrons coming from the moderator chamber are transported by a 2-m-long neutron guide inside the beam port and a 4-m-long neutron guide (two 2-m sections) outside the beam port. Both the internal neutron guide and the external neutron guide are curved with a radius of curvature equal to 300 m. To block line-of-sight radiation streaming in the guides, the cross-sectional area of the guides is separated into three channels by 1-mm-thick vertical walls.

All reflecting surfaces are coated with Ni-58.

The TCNS system provides a low background sub-thermal neutron beam for neutron reaction and scattering research. Installation and testing of the external curved neutron guides, the shielding structure, neutron focusing and a Prompt Gamma Activation Analysis facility are completed. The only other operating reactor cold neutron source in the United States is at the 27

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Techmology and uses liquid hydrogen. At least four major centers for cold neutron research exist in Europe, with another two in Japan.

The TCNS was upgraded in 2004 with a larger cryorefrigerator, cold head and instrumentation system. The larger refrigerator (22 watts from 4 watts) cools the thermosyphon system faster and produce a more rapid cooldown and better thermal control at higher reactor powers. The automatic control system (shown below) will provide alarms and automatic shutdowns if normal parameters are exceeded.

I 'dl

[KI 330 T024.00 0 -2

~3 12:01:47 13.01.18 _12147 _ __ 13:0'1:.8 Figure 2-2 TCNS Control and Instrumentation Console Prompt Gamma Activation Analysis Facility The UT-PGAA facility utilizes the focused cold-neutron beam from the Texas Cold Neutron Source. The PGAA sample is located at the focal point of the converging guide focusing system. The use of a guided focused cold-neutron beam provides a higher capture reaction rate and a lower background at the sample-detector area as compared to other facilities using filtered thermal neutron beams.

The UT-PGAA facility has been designed taking into account the advantage of the low background. The following criteria have been used during the design: a) The structure and 28

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory shielding materials for the UT-PGAA facility were chosen to minimize the background contribution for elements to be detected in the samples to be studied. b) The sample handling system was designed to be versatile to permit the study of a wide range of samples with quick and reproducible sample positioning with a minimum of material close to the samples. The shielding was improved this reporting year to reduce the hydrogen capture gamma ray background.

A 25% efficient n-type gamma-ray detector in a configuration with an offset-port dewar was purchased to be used at the UT-PGAA facility in the early 1990's. The detector was selected in order to incorporate a Compton suppression system at a later date. Vacuum failures required repeated repairs to this detector. Thus, a new 66% p-type detector was purchased as a replacement. This system could be configured for Compton suppression if required. A gamma-spectrum analysis system with 16,000 channels is used for data acquisition and processing.

The applications of the UT-PGAA includes: i) determination of B and Gd concentration in biological samples which are used for Neutron Capture Therapy studies, ii) determination of H and B impurity levels in metals, alloys, and semiconductor, iii) multielemental analysis of geological, archeological, and environmental samples for determination of major components such as Al, S, K, Ca, Ti, and Fe, and minor or trace elements such as H, B, V, Mn, Co, Cd, Nd, Sm, and Gd, and iv) multielemental analysis of biological samples for the major and minor elements H, C, N, Na, P, S, Cl, and K, and trace elements like B and Cd.

Neutron Radiography Facility The Neutron Radiography Facility at Beam Port 5 had not been significantly modified prior to 2003. That year, the NETL began to use the existing video-con radiography camera, upgraded the image capture boards and PC image analysis software and purchased a much improved neutron imaging system from NOVA Scientific based on Micro-Channel Plate technology. A cryogenically cooled CCD camera system was installed in 2006 and paired with a 64-bit software package for image reconstruction and manipulation. The system is still under initial testing but resolutions are on the order of 30- 50 microns.

29

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Figure 2-4 MCP Neutron Imaging Detector (NOVA Scientific)

Texas Intense Positron Source A reactor-based slow positron beam facility is being fabricated at the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory (NETL). The facility (Texas Intense Positron Source ) will be one of a few reactor-based slow positron beams in the world when completed. The Texas Intense Positron Source consists of a copper source, a source transport system, a combined positron moderator/remoderator assembly, a positron beam line and a sample chamber. High energy positrons from the source will be slowed down to a few eV by a tungsten foil moderator that also acts as a remoderator to reduce the beam size to enable beam transport to a target for experimentation. The beam will be electrostatically guided and will deliver about 108 positrons/sec in the energy range of 0 - 50 keV.

Reactor-based positron beams utilizing a copper source have been implemented at Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands. There are several differences between TIPS and these reactor based positron beams. The source/moderator array of the Delft positron beam is located inside one of the neutron beam ports of their reactor and the positron beam is transported out of the reactor and then remoderated before it enters into an experimental chamber.

Based on general experience on reactor based positron sources, we have decided that the moderator/remoderator assembly and the positron beam optics should be entirely outside the reactor biological shield. A source transport system will be placed in a 4 meter aluminum system for low activation that will be inserted into one of the neutron beam ports of the NETL 1-MW TRIGA Mark II research reactor. The transport system will be used to move the source to the irradiation location and out of the biological shield. The source will be moved away from the neutron beam line to an ultra high vacuum (at around 10-10 torr) chamber, where the moderator 30

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory assembly is located. The transporter, load-lock transfer sytem and ultra high vacuum systems will be separated by gate valves.

The copper source of TIPS will be irradiated across from the core in the graphite reflector, in the middle section of the through port (BP1-BP5). The isotope 6 4 Cu formed by neutron capture in 6 3 Cu (69 % in natural copper) has a half life of 12.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br />, and the branching ratio for b + emission is 19 %. Our current source design consists of copper electroplated thinly onto a carbon backing. This source minimizes the unnecessary activation products because the positrons produced are relatively near the surface of the copper.

Radiochemistry Laboratory The Department of Energy provided initial funding to equip and develop a graduate-level radiochemistry laboratory to encourage students to enter this field and replace retiring radio chemists in the DOE laboratories. The laboratory consist of state-of-the-art Alpha Spectroscopy Systems, Liquid Scintillation Counting System and several High Resolution Gamma Counting Systems.

Figure 2-7, Room 3.106 Radiochemistry Laboratory 31

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 3.0 FACILITY OPERATING SUMMARIES 3.1 Operating Experience The UT-TRIGA reactor operated for 157 days in 2008. The reactor produced a total energy output of 327.9 MW-hrs during this period. The number of days of operations this year were twenty days less than the previous year but many of the hours of operation were at reduced power to accommodate neutron activation analysis experiments requiring lower neutron fluence and hands-on training workshops at low power. The bumup per year in the sixteen years of operation is shown in Figure 3-1. This year, two lengthy maintenance periods reduced the available operational days and essentially the entire month of August had no operations to allow staff vacations and minor shutdown maintenance. The graph below indicates that the average reactor operating schedule in the last 5 years (6 month shutdown in 2000 and 5 month shutdown in 2004) is substantially increased from the early years of operation.

II Figure 3-1 History of Reactor Operations 32

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 3.2 Reactor Shutdowns The reactor safety system classifies protective action trips as one of three types, a limiting safety system (LSSS) trip, a limiting condition for operation (LCO) trip or a trip of the SCRAM manual switch. In the event the switch is used for a normal reactor shutdown, the operation is not considered a protective action shutdown. The following definitions in Table 3-1 classify the types of protective actions recorded.

Table 3-1 Protective Action Definitions Protective Action Description Safety System Setting Setpoint corresponds to detection of limiting LSSS safety system setting.

Examples:

fuel temperature percent power Condition for Operation Hardware action detects inoperable conditions LCO - (analog detection) within a safety channel or the instrument control and safety system.

Examples:

pool water level detector high voltage external circuit trips Condition for Operation Software action detects inoperable conditions LCO - (digital detection) within a program function of the instrument control and safety system.

Examples:

watchdog timers program database errors Manual Switch Operator emergency shutdown (protective action)

Manual Switch Operator routine shutdown (intentional operation) 33

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Non-Scheduled Scrams for 2008 Calendar Year Date 2/14/08-10/7/08 Scram Type: Fuel Temperature 1 Intermittent fuel temperature scram. Total of 4 spurious fuel temperature scrams recorded in 2008. Problem is very intermittent and has been investigated. All other signs indicate that the fuel temperatures remained normal.

Date 2/19/08 Scram Type: NM % High Power Scram Scram caused by statistical fluctuations in NM indicated power while running at near full power.

Date 2/22/08 Scram Type: Loss of electrical power.

Scram caused by a loss of AC power due to off-site transformer failure Date 3/19/08 Scram Type: NM % High Power Scram Scram caused by statistical fluctuations in NM indicated power while running at near full power.

Date 4/14/08 Scram Type: NM % High Power Scram Scram while in automatic after just full power.

Date 6/4/08 Scram Type: NM % High Power Scram Scram in automatic after just reaching full power.

34

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory It should be noted that the four of these shutdowns were due to operation near the scram setupoint of 105%. The setpoint was determined to avoid tripping at 1.1 MW which is considered the license limit. The actual nominal operating power for the NETL TRIGA is 0.95 MW to avoid more frequent scrams.

3.3 Utilization The NETL staff continues to perform activation and analysis services as a public service and in support of the overall UT mission. Neutron activation analysis accounted for much of the reactor utilization time with teaching labs and beam port research projects making up the remainder.

3.4 Routine Scheduled Maintenance All surveillances and scheduled maintenance were completed during the reporting year.

All results met or exceeded the limits of the Technical Specifications.

3.5 Facility Changes and Corrective Maintenance No facility changes requiring a 10 CFR 50.59 review were performed. New experiments were reviewed and approved:

a. Seven-L In-core reactor experiment

b. In-Core Thermocouple Coolant Temperature Profile

c. Fast Automatic Pneumatic System 3.6 Laboratory Inspections Inspections of laboratory operations are conducted by university and licensing agency personnel. Two committees, a Radiation Safety Committee and a Reactor Oversight Committee, review operations of the NETL facility. The Reactor Oversight Committee convened at the times listed in Table 3-6.

35

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Table 3-6 Committee Meetings Reactor Oversight Committee First Quarter March 31, 2008 Second Quarter No meeting Third Quarter September 25, 2008

.Fourth Quarter No meeting Inspections by licensing agencies include federal license activities by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Nuclear Reactor Regulation Branch (NRR), and state license activities by the Texas Department of Safety and Health Services (DSHS). NRC and DSHS inspections were held at the times presented in Table 3-7. An NRC inspection was performed the October 2008. The inspection included organizational structure and staffing, review and audit of design changes (50.59), reactor operations and maintenance. No violations or safety concerns were noted.

Table 3-7 Dates of License Inspections License Dates R- 129 October, 2008 SNM-180 None L00485(48) August, 2008 Routine inspections by the Office of Environmental Health and Safety (OEHS) for compliance with university safety rules and procedures are conducted at varying intervals 36

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory throughout the year. In response to safety concerns at other sites on the main campus, several.

additional OEHS inspections have been made. Inspections cover fire, chemical, and radiological hazards. No significant safety problems were found at NETL, which reflects favorably on the positive safety culture for all hazard classes at the NETL.

37

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 3.7 Radiation Exposures A radiation protection program for the NETL facility provides monitoring for personnel radiation exposure, surveys of radiation areas and contamination areas, and measurements of radioactive effluents. Radiation exposures for personnel, building work areas and areas of the NETL site are shown in the following tables. Site area measurements include exterior points adjacent to the building and exterior points away from the building.

Table 3-8 summarizes NETL personnel dose exposure data for the calendar year. In general, personnel exposures for 2008 were in line and less than 10% of the allowed 5000 mrem.

Figure 3-3 locates the building internal and external dosimetry sites. Dots locate fixed monitoring points within the building. Numbers identify the immediate site area radiation measurement points exterior to the building. These measurements do not indicate any measurable dose from work within the NETL building. Table 3-9 and Table 3-10 summarize doses recorded in facility work areas and the site areas. Table 3-11 contains a list of the basic requirements and frequencies of measurements.

Additional measurement data is available from the State of Texas Department of Health.

The state agency records environmental radiological exposures at five sites in the vicinity of the research reactor site. Samples are also taken for analysis of soil, vegetation, and sanitary waste effluents.

38

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Table 3-8 Personnel exposures for Year 2008

" Personnel exposures for 2008 were less than 10% of the federally allowed maximum of 5000 mrem. The greatest whole body exposure was 33 mrem.

• The highest exposures for 2008 were 75 mrem SDE and 1080 mrem extremity. The highest exposures were due to a single person in a single event.

Personnel #I Average Annual Dose Greatest Individual Dose Total Person mrem2 per Group (mrem) (mrem) Group (mrem)

Shallow Lens of Extremity Shallow Lens Extremity Shallow Lens Extremity (SDE) Eye (SDE) (SDE) of Eye (SDE) of Eye (SDE)

(LDE) (R/L) (LDE) (R/L) (SDE) (LDE) (R/L)

Facility Personnel 10.5 18.6 13.4 58/158 75 33 300/1080 195 141 610/1660 (Landauer) 3 Facility Personnel PLanoaner 10.5 14.76 - - 375 - 141 -

(Landauer

+ PD)4 Facility Personnel5 14.5 1.93 - 28 (PD only)

Facility Personnel 25 6.76 19 169 (PD total)6 Visitors 1 N/A N/A 13 N/A N/A (PD) 7 486 0.030 N/A N/A Radiation Workers fro er 13 2.15 3 28 from other Facilities

1. The number of facility personnel is calculated by summing the fraction of the year that an individual person worked.

2 The total recorded dose equivalent values reported in mrem do not include the contribution from natural background and reflect the summation of the results of 12 monthly beta, x-, and gamma ray and/or neutron dosimeters in each location. A total dose equivalent of "M" indicates that each of the dosimeters during the period was below the vendor's minimum measurable quantity of I mrem for x- and gamma rays, 10 mrem for energetic betas, 20 mrem for fast neutrons, and 10 mrem for thermal neutrons. "N/A" indicates that the measurement was not applicable and/or not measured.

3. This only includes those personnel assigned dosimetry from Landauer.

4. This indicates those personnel who were assigned from Landauer as well as facility pocket dosimetryý

5. This indicates personnel who were assigned facility pocket dosimetry only.

6. This indicates all personnel working at the facility as radiation workers.

.7. This includes members of the public as well as those students enrolled in classes at the University of Texas at Austin.

8. Includes those Facilities Services personnel who have undergone the NETL training.

39

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Table 3-9 TOTAL DOSE EQUIVALENT RECORDED ON AREA DOSIMETERS LOCATED WITHIN THE NETL FACILITY 2008 Reactor Facility Location Monitor ID Total Dose (1,2) Eye (4) Shallow (5)

R a cn,y,x Deep (3)

Reactor Bay, North Wall 00277 M 7 34 Reactor Bay, East Wall 00278 5 13 48 Reactor Bay, West Wall 00279 45677 49147 54197 Water Treatment Room 00280 20970 21459 21743 Area, Room 1.102 00281 M M M Sample Processing, Room 3.102 00173 M M I Gamma Spectroscopy Lab, Room 3.112 00174 M M M Radiation Experiment Lab, Room 3.106 00175 M M M Reception Area, Room 2.102 00176 M M M Office, Room 3.104 00222 5 5 6

1) The total recorded dose equivalent values reported in mrem do not include natural background contribution and reflect the summation of the results of 12 monthly beta, x-, and gammy ray or neutron dosimeters for each location. A total dose equivalent of"M" indicates that each of the dosimeters during the period was below the vendor's minimum measurable quantity of I mrem for x and gamma rays, 10 mrem for energetic betas, 20 mrem for fast neutrons, and 10 mrem for thermal neutron. "N/A" indicates that there was no neutron monitor in that location.

2) These dose equivalent values do not represent radiation exposure through an exterior wall directly into an unrestricted area.

3) Deep indicates Deep Dose Equivalent and applies to external whole-body exposure and is the dose equivalent at a tissue depth of 1 cm.

4) Eye indicates Eye Dose Equivalent and applies to external exposure of the lens at a depth of 0.3 cm.

5) Shallow indicates Shallow Dose Equivalent and applies to external exposure of the skin or an extremity, and is taken as the dose equivalent at a tissue depth of 0.007 cm averaged over an area of I cm2 .

Table 3-10 TOTAL DOSE EQUIVALENT RECORDED ON TLD ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORS AROUND THE NETL REACTOR FACILITY 2008*

Total Recorded Dose Equivalent' Monitor ID Reactor Facility Location (mrem) 00252 Sidewalk, NETL Front Entrance M 00253 NETL Power Transformer M 00254 NETL Roof Stack M 00255 Reactor bay exterior wall, East M 00256 Reactor bay exterior wall, West M 00257 NETL Service Door _ I 40

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory

• Environmental monitors were replaced in the second quarter 2008 from a Special TLD that measured x-, beta, and gamma radiation. The new optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters also measure the same radiations and are the same as the interior monitors.

1. The total recorded dose equivalent values reported in mrem do not include natural background contribution and reflect the summation of the results of 12 monthly beta, x-, and gamma or neutron dosimeters in each location. A total dose equivalent of "M" indicates that each of the dosimeters during the period was below the vendor's minimum measurable quantity of I mrem for x- and gamma rays, 10 mrem for energetic betas, 20 mrem for fast neutrons, and 10 mrem for thermal neutrons.

Figure 3-3 Environmental TLD Locations ACCESS ROAD PARKING 0

2 3

S 6

NETL 5

E PARKING 4

1 Sidewalk, NETL facility front entrance 2 Reactor bay exterior wall, east 3 Reactor bay exterior wall, west 4 NETL power transformer 5 NETL service door 6 NETL roof stack

• Indicates location of dosimetry within the building SERVICE DRIVE 41

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Table 3-11 Radiation Protection Program Requirements and Frequencies Frequency Radiation Protection Requirement Weekly Gamma survey of all Restricted Areas.

Swipe survey of all Restricted Areas.

Swipe survey of Radioactive Materials Areas.

Response check of the continuous air monitor.

Response checks of the area radiation monitors.

Neutron survey of the reactor bay (during reactor operation).

Monthly Gamma, neutron and swipe surveys of exterior walls and roof.

Exchange personnel dosimeters and interior area monitoring.

dosimeters.

Review dosimetry reports.

Response check emergency locker portable radiation measuring equipment.

Review Radiation Work Permits.

Response check of the argon monitor.

Response check hand and foot monitor.

Conduct background checks of low background alpha/beta counting system.

Collect and analyze TRIGA primary water.

As Required Process and record solid wastes and liquid effluent discharges.

Prepare and record radioactive material shipments.

Survey and record incoming radioactive materials.

Perform and record special radiation surveys.

Issue radiation work permits and provide health physics coverage for maintenance operations.

Conduct orientations and training.

Quarterly Exchange OSL environmental monitors.

Gamma and swipe surveys of all non-restricted areas.

Swipe survey of building exterior areas.

Calibrate area monitors in neutron generator room.

Perform Chi-square test, and determine 1-V plateaus and detection efficiencies on the low background alpha/beta counting system.

Semi-Annual Inventory emergency locker.

Calibrate portable radiation monitoring instruments.

Calibrate continuous air monitor, argon monitor, and area radiation monitors.

Calibrate personnel pocket dosimeters.

Leak test and inventory sealed sources.

Annual Conduct ALARA Committee meeting.

Conduct personnel refresher training.

Calibrate emergency locker portable radiation detection equipment 42

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Radiation Surveys Radiation surveys of NETL work areas are shown in Table 3-12. Surveys with portable instruments and measurements of radioactive contamination are routine. Supplemental measurements are also made any time unusual conditions occur. Values in the table represent the result of routine measurements. Environmental monitoring at sample sites exterior to the building are generally done at random times or as a case by case evaluation.

Table 3-12 Annual Summary of Radiation and Contamination Levels within the NETL Reactor Facility 2008 Area Radiation Levels Contamination Levels Accessible Location: (mrem/hr) (dpm/100 cm 2)

Avg. Max. Avg Max TRIGA Reactor Bay Reactor Bay North BKG BKG MDA MDA Reactor Bay South BKG BKG MDA MDA Reactor Bay East BKG BKG MDA MDA Reactor Bay West 5.2 75 MDA MDA Reactor Pool Deck (3 rd Floor) BKG BKG MDA MDA NETL Facility NAA Sample Processing BKG BKG MDA MDA (Rm 3.102)

NAA Sample Counting BKG BKG MDA MDA (Rm 3.112)

Health Physics Laboratory <0.1 2 MDA MDA NAA Lab (Rm. 3.106) BKG BKG MDA MDA 43

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 3.9 Radioactive Effluents, Radioactive Waste Radioactive effluents are releases to the air and to the sanitary sewer system. The most significant effluent is an airborne radionuclide, argon-41. Two other airborne radionuclides, nitrogen-16 and oxygen-19, decay rapidly and do not contribute to effluent releases. Argon-41, with a half-life of 109 minutes is the only airborne radionuclide emitted by the facility. A summary of the argon-41 releases are shown in Table 3-13. Total quantity of Ar-41 released in 2008 was 4.19% of the T.S. allowance. This is based on a conservative dilution factor.

Evaluation of the radioactive gaseous effluent by the COMPLY code indicates the NETL is in compliance with dose limits to the public with a calculated effective dose equivalent of 3.0 mRem/yr at the conservative receptor point.

Table 3-13 Monthly Summary. of Argon-41 Effluent Releases 2008' Total Quantity 41Ar Average Concentration Percentage of 4 1Ar Discharge Date, 2008 Toteal Q ed tity of4'Ar at Point of Released relative to Released (*Ci) Release Tech Spec.

January 6.28E3 1.08E-9 0.054 February 1.68E6 2.88E-7 14.38 March 9.94E5 1.70E-7 8.51 April 6.84E5 1.17E-7 5.85 May LO1E5 1.73E-8 0.867 June 3.74E5 6.40E-8 3.20 July 3.45E5 5.90E-8 2.95 August 5.98E3 1.02E-9 0.051 September 1.88E5 3.21 E-8 1.61 October 8.77E5 1.50E-7 7.51 November 5.53E5 9.46E-8 4.73 December 7.03 E4 1.20E-8 0.601 ANNUAL VALUE 5.88E6 1.OIE-6 4.19

1) Point of release is roof exhaust stack. Concentration includes dilution factor of 0.2 for mixing with main exhaust.

2) Technical Specification limit for continuous release is 2.OOE-6 laCi/cm 3.

Large liquid releases to the sanitary sewer are done from waste hold up tanks at irregular intervals. To date, no releases have been made. The liquid radioactive waste tanks allow for segregation of liquids for decay of the activity. Liquids may also be processed on-site to concentrate the radionuclides into other forms prior to disposal. Small quantities of liquid scintillation cocktail or dilute concentrations may be disposed directly to the sanitary sewer if below the limits of 10 CFR 20. There were no solid waste transfers off the NETL R-129 License in 2008.

44

2008 Annual Report of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Table 3-14 Monthly Summary of Solid Waste Transfers for Disposal and Liquid Effluent Releases to the Sanitary Sewer from the NETL Facility 2008 3

Total Activity (PCi) Total Activity (TaCi) Released Discharge/Disposal Date Volume Released (cm )

January 0 NONE No Releases February 0 NONE No Releases March 0 NONE No Releases April 0 NONE No Releases May 0 NONE No Releases June 0 NONE No Releases July 0 NONE No Releases August 0 NONE No Releases September 0 NONE No Releases October 0 NONE No Releases November 0 NONE No Releases December 0 NONE No Releases 45