ML16076A415

University of Texas, Austin, 2015 Annual Report

ML16076A415
Person / Time
Site:	University of Texas at Austin
Issue date:	03/02/2016
From:	Biegalski S University of Texas at Austin
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
DE-AC07-ER03919
Download: ML16076A415 (47)

Text

The University of Texas at Austin Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 2015 Annual Report NRC Docket 50-602 DOE Contract No. DE-AC07-ER03919 03/02/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report

.... eparrme lr of Mec h nical En~igineering

,..,,..** **TI-I UNIVERSI'FY OF* TEXAS AT AUSTIN

'**,;,;4,*:*."

.::*r: ,* ,....; Nucl'ar Fnr,'ineceinq, fi'achiuit Laboraioy, Austin. *kx'as 78758.

"**:t*'*s"*"u

.. "FX 512-47M-589" .512-232-.5370-hIpltwwusuz.uteaas~edu/-neti/nteihiml FORWARD The mission of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laborato1ry at The University of Texas at Austin is to:

• Educate the next generation of leaders in nuclear science and engineering.

aConduct leading research at the forefront of the international nuclear community.

• Apply nuclear technology for solving multidisciplinary problems.

,, Provide service to the citizens of Texas, the U.S., and the international community.

This objective is achieved by carrying out a well-balanced program of education, research, and service. The NETL research reactor supports hands-on education in reactor physics and nuclear science, In addition, students in non-nuclear fields such as physics, chemistry, and biology use the reactor in laboratory course work. The NETL is also used in education programs for nuclear power plant personnel, secondary schools students and teachers, and the general public.

T[he NETL research reactor benefits a wide range of on-campus and off-campus users.

including academic, medical, industrial, and government organizations. The principal services offered by our reactor involve material irradiation. trace element detection, material analysis. and radiographic analysis of objects and processes. Such services establish beneficial links to off-campus users, expose faculty and students to multidisciplinary research and commercial applications of nuclear science, and gencrate resources to help support Nuclear E.ngineering activities.

Steven lBiegaiski, Ph.D., P.E3.

Director, Nuclear Engineering T'eachingz Laboratory ii ii2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Table of Contents Table of Contents iii Executive Summary v 1.0 NUCLEAR ENGINEERING TEACHING LABORATORY ANNUAL REPORT 1 1.1 General 1 1.2 Purpose of the report 1 2.0 ORGANIZATION AND ADMINSTRATION 3 2.1 Level 1 4 2.2 Level 2 5 2.3 Level 3 8 2.4 Level 4 10 2.5 Other Facility Staff 10 2.6 Faculty and Facility users 10 2.7 NETL Support 12 3.0 FACILITY DESCRIPTION 13 3.1 NETL History 13 3.2 NETL SITE, J.J. Pickle Research Campus 13 3.3 NETL Building Description 13 4.0 UT-TRIGA MARK II RESEARCH REACTOR 15 4.1 Reactor Core 15 4.2 Reactor Reflector 16 4.3 Reactor Control 16 5.0 EXPERIMENT AND RESEARCH FACILITIES 18 5.1 Upper Grid Plate 7L and 3L Experiment Facilities 18 5.2 Central Thimble 18 5.3 Rotary Specimen Rack 18 5.4 Pneumatic Tubes 19 5.5 Beam Port Facilities 19 5.6 Other Experiment and Research Facilities 23 5.7 Experiment Facility Utilization 24 5.8 Nuclear Program Faculty Activities 25 6.0 OPERATING

SUMMARY

32 6.1 Operating Experience 32 6.2 Unscheduled Shutdowns 32 6.3 Utilization 34 6.4 Routine Scheduled Maintenance 36 6.5 Corrective Maintenance 36 6.6 Facility Changes 37 6.7 Oversight & Inspections 38

°°° 111 iii 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report 7.0 RADIOLOGICAL

SUMMARY

39 7.1 Summary of Radiological Exposures 40 7.2 Summary of Radioactive Effluents 40 7.3 Radiological Exposure Received by Facility Personnel and Visitors 40 7.4 Environmental Surveys Performed Outside the Facility 40 iv iv 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

The Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory (NETL) facility supports the academic and research missions of The University of Texas, and provides these support functions to other institutions. The environmental research and analysis services performed by the NETL during the past year have been used to support Idaho National Laboratories, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Environment Canada, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization, and numerous corporate clients.

V V2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 1.0 NUCLEAR ENGINEERING TEACHING LABORATORY ANNUAL REPORT The Nuclear Engineering Laboratory Annual Report covers the period from January through December 2015. The report includes descriptions of the organization, NETL facilities, the reactor, experiment and research facilities and summaries of operations and radiological impact.

1.1 General The NETL facility serves a multipurpose role, with the primary function as a "user facility" for faculty, staff, and students of the Cockrell School of Engineering. The NETL supports development and application of nuclear methods for researchers from other universities, government organizations and industry. The NETL provides nuclear analytic services to researchers, industry, and other laboratories for characterization, testing and evaluation of materials. The NETL provides public education through tours and demonstrations.

igure 1-1, NETL - Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Activities at NETL are regulated by Federal and State agencies. The nuclear reactor is subject to the terms and specifications of Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) License R-129, a class 104 research reactor license. A second NRC license for special nuclear materials, SNM- 180, authorizes possession of a subcritical assembly, neutron sources, and various equipment. The NETL is responsible for administration and management of both licenses. Activities at the University using radioisotopes are conducted under a State of Texas license, L00485. Functions of the broad license are the responsibility of the University Office of Environmental Health and Safety.

1.2 Purpose of this Report This report meets requirements of the reactor Technical Specifications and the Department of Energy Fuels Assistance program, and provides an overview of the education, research, and service programs of the NETL for the calendar year 2015.

1 12/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 1.2.1 TRIGA II Reactor Technical Specifications The NETL TRIGA II reactor Technical Specifications (section 6.6.1) requires submission of an annual report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Table 1.1 correlates specified requirements to the report.

Table 1.1, TRIGA Mark II Technical Specification and the Annual Report Specification Section A narrative summary of reactor operating experience including the energy 5.,6163 produced by the reactor or the hours the reactor was critical, or both.5.,6163 The unscheduled shutdowns & corrective action taken to preclude recurrence 6.2 Major preventive & corrective maintenance operations with safety significance 6.4 Major changes in the reactor facility and procedures, tabulation of new tests or experiments, or both, significantly different from those performed previously, 6.6 including conclusions that no unreviewed safety questions were involved A summary of radioactive effluents (nature & amount) released or discharged to the environs beyond effective control of the university as determined at or before the point of such release or discharge, including to the extent practicable an 7.

estimate of individual radionuclides present in the effluent or a statement that the estimated average release after dilution or diffusion is less than 25% of the concentration allowed or recommended A summary of exposures received by facility personnel and visitors where such exposures are greater than 25% of that allowed or recommended.7.

A summarized result of environmental surveys performed outside the facility 7.4 1.2.2 The Department of Energy Fuels Assistance Program The DOE University Fuels Assistance program (DE-AC07-05ID 14517, subcontract 00078206) supports the facility for utilization of the reactor in a program of education and training of students in nuclear science and engineering, and for faculty and student research. The contract requires an annual progress report in conjunction with submittal of a Material Balance Report and Physical Inventory Listing report. Specific technical details of the report (listed in Table 1.2) are sent under separate cover to the DOE with this Annual Report.

Table 1.2, DOE Reactor Fuel Assistance Report Requirements Fuel usage (grams Uranium 235 & number of fuel elements)

Inventory of unirradiated fuel elements in storage Inventory of fuel elements in core Inventory of useable irradiated fuel elements outside of core Projected 5-year fuel needs Current inventory of other nuclear material items with DOE-ID project identifier (i.e., "J")

Point of contact for nuclear material accountability 2 22/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 2.0 ORGANIZATION AND ADMINSTRATION The University of Texas System (UTS) was established by the Texas Constitution in 1876, and currently consists of eight academic universities and six health institutions. The UTS mission is to provide high-quality educational opportunities for the enhancement of the human resources of Texas, the nation, and the world through intellectual and personal growth.

The Board of Regents is the governing body for the UTS. It is composed of members appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. Terms are of six years each and staggered, with the terms of three members expiring on February 1 of odd-numbered years. Current members of the current Board of Regents are listed in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1 The University of Texas Board for 2015 Paul L. Foster, Chairman Jeffery Hildebrand, Vice Chairman R. Steven Hicks, Vice Chairman Members with term set to expire May 2016 Student Regent Nash M. Home Members with term set to expire February 2017 Regent Alex M. Cranberg Regent Wallace L. Hall, Jr.

Regent Brenda Pejovich Members with term set to expire February2019 Chairman Paul L. Foster Vice Chairman R. Steven Hicks Regent David J. Beck Regent Sara Matrinez Tucker http://www.utsystem.edulboard-of-regents/current-regents, 02/26/2016 The chief executive officer of the UTS is the Chancellor. The Chancellor has direct line responsibility for all aspects of UTS operations, and reports to and is responsible to the Board of Regents. The current Chancellor and Staff are listed in Table 2.2.

Table 2.2 University of Texas System Chancellor's Office William H. McRaven, Chancellor David E. Daniel, PhD, Deputy Chancellor http://www.utsystem.edu/chancellor, 02/26/2016 UT Austin is the flagship campus of the UTS. The facility operating license for the TRIGA Mark II at the NETL is issued to the University of Texas at Austin. Figure 2-1 reflects the organizational structure for 4 levels of line management of the NETL reactor, as identified in the Technical Specifications, as well as oversight functions. Other NETL resources (in addition to line management positions) include staff with specialized functions, and faculty and facility 3 32/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report users. NETL support is through a combination of State allocation, research programs, and remuneration for service.

Prscdoo E of t tgheeigea DieprstmenofTeIa Reacorustriin Radiation Safety PuleroEninosngtean Officer ] Laboratory.Director

[i§3ealhPami]t Reactor Supervisor

.... Oper ation Staff ......

Reactor & Senior Operators Figure 2-1, Organizational Structure for the University of Texas at Ausitn TRILGA Reactor 2.1 Level 1 Personnel Level 1 represents the central administrative functions of the University and the Cockrell School of Engineering. The University of Texas at Austin is composed of 16 separate colleges and schools; the Cockrell School of Engineering manages eight departments with individual degree programs. The Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory (NETL) is one of several education and research functions within the School. Current Level 1 personnel are reported in Table 2.3.

2.1 .1 President, University of Texas at Austin The President is the individual vested by the University of Texas system with responsibility for the University of Texas at Austin.

2.1.2 Executive Vice president and Provost (Provost)

Research and educational programs are administered through the Office of the Executive Vice President and Provost. Separate officers assist with the administration of research activities and 4 42/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report academic affairs with specific management functions delegated to the Dean of the Cockrell School of Engineering and the Chairman of the Mechanical Engineering Department.

2.1.3 Dean of the Cockrell School of Engineering The Dean of the Cockrell School of Engineering reports to the Provost. The School consists of 8 departments and undergraduate degree programs and 12 graduate degree programs.

2.1.4 Department of Mechanical Engineering Chairman The Chairman reports to the Dean of the Cockrell School of Engineering. The Department manages 8 areas of study, including Nuclear and Radiation Engineering.

Table 2.3 The University of Texas at Austin Administration (Level 1)

William Powers Jr., JD, President Greg L. Fenves, PhD, President Judith H. Langlois, PhD, Interim Executive Vice Presidetn and Provost Gregory L. Fenves, PhD, Dean, Cockrell School of Engineering Wood, Sharon, PhD, (interim) Dean, Cockrell School of Engineering Jayathi Murthy, Chair of Department of Mechanical Engineering 2.2 Level 2 Personnel The Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory operates as a unit of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas. Level 2 personnel are those with direct responsibilities for administration and management of resources for the facility, including the Chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department, the NETL Director and Associate Director.

Oversight roles are provided at Level 2 by the Radiation Safety Committee, the Radiation Safety Officer and the Nuclear Reactor Committee. The current complement of Level 2 personnel is reported along with the NETL facility staff and the Nuclear and Radiation Engineering program faculty in Table 2.4.

Table 2.4 Facility Staff & NRE Faculty NETL Facility Staff NRE Faculty Director S. Biegalski S. Biegalski Associate Director P. M. Whaley S. Landsberger Reactor Supervisor M. Krause E. Schneider Health Physicist & Lab manager T. Tipping Administrative Associate D. Judson Electronics Technician!/Reactor Operator G. Kline N. Mohammed U. Chatterjee Health Physics Technician J. Sims 5 52/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 2.2.1 Director, Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory (NETL Director)

Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory programs are directed by an engineering faculty member with academic responsibilities in nuclear engineering and research related to nuclear applications. The Director is a member of the Cockrell School of Engineering, and the Department of Mechanical Engineering.

2.2.2 Associate Director The Associate Director is responsible for safe and effective conduct of operations and maintenance of the TRIGA nuclear reactor. Other activities performed by the Associate Director and staff include neutron and gamma irradiation service, operator/engineering training courses, and teaching reactor short courses. In addition to Level 3 staff, an Administrative Assistant and an Electronics Technician report to the Associate Director. Many staff functions overlap, with significant cooperation required.

2.2.4 Safety Oversight Safety oversight is provided for radiation protection and facility safety functions. A University of Texas Radiation Safety Committee is responsible programmatically for coordination, training and oversight of the University radiation protection program, with management of the program through a Radiation Safety Officer. Current personnel on the Radiation Safety Committee are listed in Table 2.5.

Nuclear reactor facility safety oversight is the responsibility of a Nuclear Reactor Committee; a request has been made to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to change the name "Nuclear Reactor Committee" to "Reactor Oversight Committee" to better describe the committee function for the University and avoid confusion with other NRC organizations. "Reactor Oversight Committee" will be used in this report pending approval. Current personnel on the Reactor Oversight Committee are listed on Table 2.6.

Radiation Safety Committee. The Radiation Safety Committee reports to the President and has the broad responsibility for policies and practices regarding the license, purchase, shipment, use, monitoring, disposal and transfer of radioisotopes or sources of ionizing radiation at The University of Texas at Austin. The Committee meets at least three times each calendar year. The Committee is consulted by the Office of Environmental Health and Safety concerning any unusual or exceptional action that affects the administration of the Radiation Safety Program.

Table 2.5 6 62/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Radiation Safety Committee 2013-2014 Neal E. Armstrong, Ph.D., P.E., BCEE, Vice Provost for Institutional Accreditation Geral Hoffmann, Ph.D., Professor, Department of Physics W. Scott Pennington, ex-officio, Environmental Health and Safety Rick Russell, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Molecular Biosciences John M. Salsman, CHP, Director, Environmental Health and Safety Juan M. Sanchez, Ph.D., Vice President, Research Bob G. Sanders, Ph.D., Professor, Department of Molecular Biosciences Tracy N. Tipping, CHP, Health Physicist Laboratory Manager, Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Karen M. Vasquez, Ph.D., Professor, Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology Kevin N. Dalby, Ph.D., Professor, Division of Medicinal Chemistry Texas Department of State Health Services License L00485, 02/26/20 16 Radiation Safety Officer. A Radiation Safety Officer holds delegated authority of the Radiation Safety Committee in the daily implementation of policies and practices regarding the safe use of radioisotopes and sources of radiation as determined by the Radiation Safety Committee. The Radiation Safety Officer's responsibilities are outlined in The University of Texas at Austin Radiation Safety Manual. The Radiation Safety Officer has an ancillary function rcporting to the NETL Director as required on matters of radiological protection. The Radiation Safety Program is administered through the University Office of Environmental Health and Safety.

A NETL Health Physicist (Level 3) manages daily radiological protection functions at the NETL, and reports to the Radiation Safety Officer as well as the Associate Director. This arrangement assures independence of the Health Physicist through the Radiation Safety Officer while maintaining close interaction with NETL line management.

Reactor Oversight Committee (ROC'). The Reactor Oversight Committee (formerly known as the Nuclear Reactor Committee) evaluates, reviews, and approves facility standards for safe operation of the nuclear reactor and associated facilities. The ROC meets at least semiannually.

The ROC provides reports to the Dean on matters as necessary throughout the year and submits a final report of activities no later than the end of the spring semester. The ROC makes recommendations to the NETL Director for enhancing the safety of nuclear reactor operations.

Specific requirements in the Technical Specifications are incorporated in the committee charter, including an audit of present and planned operations. The ROC is chaired by a professor in the Cockrell School of Engineering. ROC Membership varies, consisting of ex-officio and appointed positions. The Dean appoints at least three members to the Committee that represent a broad spectrum of expertise appropriate to reactor technology, including personnel external to the School.

7 72/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 2.6 ReactorOversightCommittee_2015-2016 ________

Erich Schneider (ME), Chair Ozzie Bayrak (CAEE)

Charlie Werth (CAEE)

Steven Biegalski (ME)

Lawrence R. Jacobi (External Representative)

Jodi Jenkins (External Representative)

Michael Krause, ex-officio (NETL)

Tracy Tipping, ex-officio (NETL)

Mike Whaley, ex-officio (NETL)

John G. Ekerdt, ex-officio Scott Pennington, other (Radiation Safety Officer)

Erich Schneider (ME), Chair https://www.engr.utexas.edu/faculty/committees/225-roc, 02/26/2016 2.3 Level 3 Personnel Level 3 personnel are responsible for managing daily activities at the NETL. The Reactor Supervisor and Health Physicist are Level 3. The current Reactor Supervisor and Health Physicist are listed on Table 2.4.

2.3.1 Reactor Supervisor The Reactor Supervisor function is incorporated in a Reactor Manager position, responsible for daily operations, maintenance, scheduling, and training. The Reactor Manager is responsible for the maintenance and daily operations of the reactor, including coordination and performance of activities to meet the Technical Specifications of the reactor license. The Reactor Manager plans and coordinates emergency exercises with first responders and other local support (Austin Fire Department, Austin/Travis County EMS, area hospitals, etc.).

The Reactor Manager, assisted by Level 4 personnel and other NETL staff, implements modifications to reactor systems and furnishes design assistance for new experiment systems.

The Reactor Manager assists initial experiment design, fabrication, and setup. The Reactor Manager provides maintenance, repair support, and inventory control of computer, electronic, and mechanical equipment. The Administrative Assistant and Reactor Manager schedule and coordinate facility tours, and support coordination of building maintenance.

2.2.1 Health Physicist The Health Physicist function is incorporated into a Laboratory Manager position, responsible for radiological protection (Health Physics), safe and effective utilization of the facility (Lab Management), and research support. Each of these three functions is described below. The Laboratory Manager is functionally responsible to the NETL Associate Director, but maintains a strong reporting relationship to the University Radiation Safety Officer and is a member of the 8 82/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Radiation Safety Committee. This arrangement allows the Health Physicist to operate independent of NETL operational constraints in consideration of radiation safety.

Health Physics. NETL is a radiological facility operating in the State of Texas under a facility operating license issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Radioactive material and activities associated with operation of the reactor are regulated by the NRC, and the uses of radioactive materials at the NETL not associated with the reactor are regulated by the Texas Department of State Health Services (TDSHS) Radiation Control Program. The NETL Health Physicist ensures operations comply with these requirements, and that personnel exposures are maintained ALARA ("as low as is reasonably achievable"). One or more part-time Undergraduate Research Assistant (URA) may assist as Health Physics Technicians.

Lab Management. The lab management function is responsible for implementation of occupational safety and health programs at the NETL. The Laboratory Manager supports University educational activities through assistance to student experimenters in their projects by demonstration of the proper radiation work techniques and controls. The Laboratory Manager participates in emergency planning for NETL and the City of Austin to provide basic response requirements and conducts off-site radiation safety training to emergency response personnel such as the Hazardous Materials Division of the Fire Department, and Emergency Medical Services crews.

Research Support. The mission of The University of Texas at Austin is to achieve excellence in the interrelated areas of undergraduate education, graduate education, research and public service. The Laboratory Manager and research staff supports the research and educational missions of the university at large, as well as development or support of other initiatives.

The Laboratory Manager is responsible for coordinating all phases of a project, including proposal and design, fabrication and testing, operation, evaluation, and removal/dismantlement.

Researchers are generally focused on accomplishing very specific goals, and the research support function ensures the NETL facilities are utilized in a safe efficient manner to produce quality data. The Laboratory Manager obtains new, funded research programs to promote the capabilities of the neutron beam projects division for academic, government and industrial organizations and/or groups.

The NETL provides unique facilities for nuclear analytic techniques, including but not limited to elemental analysis (instrumental neutron activation analysis, prompt gamma analysis),

measurements of physical characteristics (neutron depth profiling, neutron radiography) and experimental techniques investigating fundamental issues related to nuclear physics and condensed matter. Nuclear analytical techniques support individual projects ranging from class assignments to measurements for faculty research.

The Laboratory Manager manages the use of the five beam ports with the Texas Cold Neutron Source, Neutron Depth Profiling, Neutron Guide and Focusing System, Prompt Gamma Activation Analysis Neutron Radiography and Texas Intense Positron Source. Projects are supported in engineering, chemistry, physics, geology, biology, zoology, and other areas.

Research project support includes elemental measurements for routine environmental and 9 92/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report innovative research projects. The neutron activation analysis technique is made available to different state agencies to assist with quality control of sample measurements.

2.4 Level 4 Personnel Reactor Operators and Senior Reactor Operators (RO/SRO) operate and maintain the reactor and associated facilities. An RO/SRO may operate standard reactor experiment facilities as directed by the Reactor Supervisor.

2.5 Other Facility Staff In addition to the line management positions defined in Figure 2-1, NETL staff includes an Administrative Assistant, an Electronics Technician, and variously one or more Undergraduate Research Assistants assigned either non-licensed maintenance support (generally but not necessarily in training for Reactor Operator licensure) or to support the Laboratory Manager as Health Physics Technicians and/or research support.

2.6 Faculty and Facility Users The complement of faculty and facility users at the NETL is extremely variable. Functionally faculty and facility users are associated with the NETL in the capacity of academic utilization, other educational efforts, or research & service. A description of these activities follows.

2.6.1 Academic Utilization The NETL is integrated in the Nuclear and Radiation Engineering program (NRE) of Mechanical Engineering (ME). The ME faculty complement directly supporting the nuclear education program is listed in Table 2.7. Successful participation in the undergraduate program results in a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering, Nuclear Engineering certification; the degree is essentially a major in Mechanical Engineering with a minor in Nuclear Engineering. All Mechanical Engineering degree requirements must be met with an additional set of specific nuclear engineering courses successfully completed.

Table 2.7 University of Texas Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Program Faculty Dr. Steven Biegalski, Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Associate Professor Dr. Dale Klein, Associate Vice Chancellor for Research Dr. Kendra M. Foltz-Biegalski, Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Research Engineer Dr. Sheldon Landsberger, Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Professor Dr.Mitch Pryor, Robotics Research Group Research Associate Dr. Erich Schneider, Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Assistant Professor https://nuclear.engr.utexas.edulindex.php/faculty-and-staff, 02/26/2016 Of the five undergraduate Nuclear Engineering courses and the dozen graduate Nuclear Engineering courses, five courses make extensive use of the reactor facility. Table 2.8 lists the 10 10 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report courses currently in the UT course catalog, many of which use the reactor and its experiment facilities.

Table 2.8, Nuclear Engineering Courses Undergraduate ME 136N, 236N: Concepts in Nuclear and Radiological Engineering ME 337C: Introduction to Nuclear Power Systems ME3 37F: Nuclear Environmental Protection ME 337G: Nuclear Safety and Security~ll ME 361E: Nuclear Operations and Reactor Engineering ME 361iF: Radiation and Radiation protection Laboratory Graduate ME 388C: Nuclear Power Engineering ME 388D: Nuclear Reactor Theory I[]1 ME 388F: Computational Methods in Radiation Transport' 11 ME 388G: Nuclear Radiation Shielding[ 11 ME 388H: Nuclear Safety and Security' 11 ME 388J: Neutron Interactions and their Applications in Nuclear Science and Engineering[11 ME 388M: Mathematical Methods for Nuclear and Radiation Engineers* 1 1 ME 388N: Design of Nuclear Systems It" ME 388P: Applied Nuclear Physics[ 1 1 ME 388S: Modem Trends in Nuclear and Radiation Engineering~ll ME 389C: Nuclear Environmental Protection NE 389F: The Nuclear Fuel Cycle~' 1 ME 390F: Nuclear Analysis Techniques ME 390G: Nuclear Engineering Laboratory ME390T: Nuclear- and Radio-Chemistry NOTEfI], Academic courses with minimal or no use of the reactorfacilities The NRE program's graduate degrees are completely autonomous; they are Master of Science in Engineering (Concentration in Nuclear Engineering) and Doctor of Philosophy (Concentration in Nuclear Engineering). Course requirements for these degrees and the qualifying examination for the Ph.D. are separate and distinct from other areas of Mechanical Engineering. A Dissertation Proposal and Defense of Dissertation are required for the Ph.D. degree and acted on by a NRE dissertation committee.

2.6.2 Other Education Efforts The NETL has participated in the IAEA Fellowship programs for the past decade. Several Fellows and Visiting Scientists spend 3-6 months at the NETL per year.

The Nuclear Engineering Teaching Lab also extends its facilities to two Historically Black Colleges or Universities (HBCUs). Both Hutson-Tillotson University in Austin and Florida Memorial University in Miami Gardens, Florida have participated in this these educational efforts.

11 11 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report The NETL provides a reactor based training course to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, with 2 courses in 2015.

In addition to formal classes, the NETL routinely provides short courses or tours for Texas agencies, high schools and pre-college groups such as the Boy Scouts of America. Tours and special projects are available to promote public awareness of nuclear energy issues. A typical tour is a general presentation for high school and civic organizations. Other tours given special consideration are demonstrations for interest groups such as physics, chemistry and science groups.

2.6.3 Research & Service A more comprehensive description of the nuclear analytic techniques and facilities available at the NETL is provided in section 5. Personnel support for these activities includes faculty, graduate and undergraduate research assistants, and NETL staff.

2.7 NETL Support NETL funding is provided by state appropriations, research grants, and fees accrued from service activities. Research funding supplements the base budget provided by the State and is generally obtained through competitive research and program awards. Funds from service activities supplement base funding to allow the facility to provide quality data acquisition and analysis capabilities. Both sources of supplemental funds (competitive awards and service work) are important to the education and research environment for students.

12 12 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 3.0 FACILITY DESCRIPTION 3.1 NETL History Development of the nuclear engineering program was an effort of both physics and engineering faculty during the late 1950's and early 1960's. The program became part of the Mechanical Engineering Department where it currently resides. The program installed and operated the first UT TRIGA nuclear reactor in Taylor Hall on the main campus. Initial criticality for the first UT reactor was August 1963. Power at startup was 10 kilowatts with a power upgrade to 250 kilowatts in 1968. Total bumnup during the 25 year period from 1963 to final operation in April 1988 was 26.1 megawatt-days. Pulse capability of the reactor was 1.4% Ak/k with a total of 476 pulses during the operating history.

In October 1983, planning was initiated for the NETL to replace the original UT TRIGA installation. Construction was initiated December 1986 and completed in May 1989. The NETL facility operating license was issued in January 1992, with initial criticality on March 12, 1992.

Dismantling and decommissioning of the first UT TRIGA reactor facility was completed in December 1992.

3.2 NETL SITE, J.J. Pickle Research Campus Land development in the area of the current NETL installation began as an industrial site during the 1940's. Following the 1940's, lease agreements between the University and the Federal government led to the creation of the Balcones Research Center. The University became owner of the site in the 1960's, and in 1994 the site name was changed to the J.J. Pickle Research Campus (PRC) in honor of retired U.S. Congressman James "Jake" Pickle.

The PRC is a multidiscipline research campus on 1.87 square kilometers. The site consists of two approximately equal areas, east and west. An area of about 9000 square meters on the east tract is the location of the NETL building. Sixteen separate research units and at least five other academic research programs conduct research at locations on the PRC. Adjacent to the NETL site are the Center for Research in Water Resources, the Bureau of Economic Geology, and the Research Office Complex, illustrating the diverse research activities on the campus. A Commons Building provides cafeteria service, recreation areas, meeting rooms, and conference facilities.

3.3 NETL Building Description The NETL building is a 1950 sq meter (21,000 sq fi), facility with laboratory and office spaces.

Building areas consist of two primary laboratories of 330 sq m (3600 sq ft) and 80 sq m (900 sq fi), eight support laboratories (217 sq m, 2340 sq fi), and six supplemental areas (130 sq m, 1430 sq ft). Conference and office space is allocated to 12 rooms totaling 244 sq m (2570 sq fi). One of the primary laboratories contains the TRIGA reactor pool, biological shield structure, and neutron beam experiment area. A second primary laboratory consists of 1.3 meter (4.25 fi) thick walls for use as a general purpose radiation experiment facility. Other areas of the building include shops, instrument & measurement laboratories, and material handling facilities.

13 13 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report The NETL Annex was installed in 2005, a 24 by 60 foot modular class room building adjacent to the NETL building. The building provides classroom space and offices for graduate students working at the NETL.

14 14 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 4.0 UT-TRIGA MARK II RESEARCH REACTOR TRIGA is an acronym for Training, Research, Isotope production, General Atomics. The TRIGA Mark II reactor is a versatile and inherently safe research reactor conceived and developed by General Atomics to meet education and research requirements. The UT-TRIGA reactor provides sufficient power and neutron flux for comprehensive and productive work in many fields including physics, chemistry, engineering, medicine, and metallurgy REIlCTOUl E--C RG;

• - CJTRR1."'- ,ALUNINIOfUl TfINk uuHIIrBRT

• . .4..IC

• T. .l -

Fiue41 T TRIAMr I ula eeac eco Th NT U-TIA eatr s nabvegoud fie-oersac eco.Teratrcr 4.1 Core.

Reactor The reacto core is n assembl of abot-00ue

• elmet surune bya nuargaht netoelco.Fe elements are poiioe ban uppeTradlwrgi ltwt waled saNlEss sTeelG tue.ctheferrgo is an ixdcor rsalloo lwereactrThed ureanium inra metallu, 15 15 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report zirconium hydride (UZrH) matrix. Physical properties of the TRIGA fuel provide an inherently safe operation. Rapid power transients to high powers are automatically suppressed without using mechanical control; the reactor quickly and automatically returns to normal power levels.

Pulse operation, a normal mode, is a practical demonstration of this inherent safety feature.

N.t Figure 4-2, Core and Support Structure Details 4.2 Reactor Reflector.

The reflector is a graphite cylinder in a welded aluminum-canister. A 10" well in the upper surface of the reflector accommodates an irradiation facility, the rotary specimen rack (RSR), and horizontal penetrations through the side of the reflector allow extraction of neutron beams. In 2000 the canister was flooded to limit deformation stemming from material failure in welding joints. In 2004, the reflector was replaced with some modification, including a modification to the upper grid plate for more flexible experiment facilities.

4.3 Reactor Control.

The UT-TRIGA research reactor can operate continuously at nominal powers up to 1.1 MW, or in the pulsing mode with maximum power levels up to 1500 MW (with a trip setpoint of 1750 MW) for durations of about 10 msec. The pulsing mode is particularly useful in the study of reactor kinetics and control. The UT-TRIGA research reactor uses a compact microprocessor-driven control system. The digital control system provides a unique facility for performing reactor physics experiments as well as reactor operator training. This advanced system provides for flexible and efficient operation with precise power level and flux control, and permanent retention of operating data.

The power level of the UT-TRIGA is controlled by a regulating rod, two shim rods, and a transient rod. The control rods are fabricated with integral extensions containing fuel (regulating 16 16 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report and shim rods) or air (transient rod) that extend through the lower grid plate for full span of rod motion. The regulating and shim rods are fabricated from B4 C contained in stainless steel tubes; the transient rod is a solid cylinder of borated graphite clad in aluminum. Removal of the rods from the core allows the rate of neutron induced fission (power) in the UZrH fuel to increase.

The regulating rod can be operated by an automatic control system that adjusts the rod position to maintain an operator-selected reactor power level. The shim rods provide a coarse control of reactor power. The transient rod can be operated by pneumatic pressure to permit rapid changes in control rod position. The transient rod moves within a perforated aluminum guide tube.

17 17 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 5.0 EXPERIMENT AND RESEARCH FACILITIES Neutrons produced in the reactor core can be used in a wide variety of research applications including nuclear reaction studies, neutron scattering experiments, nuclear analytical techniques, and irradiation of samples. Facilities for positioning samples or apparatus in the core region include cut-outs fabricated in the upper grid plate, a central thimble in the peak flux region of the core, a rotary specimen rack in the reactor graphite reflector, and a pneumatically operated transfer system accessing the core in an in-core section. Beam ports, horizontal cylindrical voids in the concrete shield structure, allow neutrons to stream out away from the core. Experiments may be performed inside the beam ports or outside the concrete shield in the neutron beams.

Areas outside the core and reflector are available for large equipment or experiment facilities.

Current NRE and NETL personnel and active projects are tabulated at the end of this section (Table 5.4).

In addition to reactor facilities, the NETL has a subcritical assembly, various radioisotope sources, radiation producing machines, and laboratories for spectroscopy and radiochemistry.

5.1 Upper Grid Plate 7L and 3L Facilities The upper grid plate of the reactor contains four removable sections configured to provide space for experiments otherwise occupied by fuel elements (two three-element and two seven-element spaces). Containers can be fabricated with appropriate shielding or neutron absorbers to tailor the gamma and neutron spectrum to meet specific needs. Special cadmium-lined facilities have been constructed that utilize three element spaces.

5.2 Central Thimble The reactor is equipped with a central thimble for access to the point of maximum flux in the core. The central thimble is an aluminum tube extending through the central penetration of the top and bottom grid plates. Typical experiments using the central thimble include irradiation of small samples and the exposure of materials to a collimated beam of neutrons or gamma rays.

5.3 Rotary Specimen Rack (RSR)

A rotating (motor-driven) multiple-position specimen rack located in a well in the top of the graphite reflector provides for irradiation and activation of multiple samples and/or batch production of radioisotopes. Rotation of the RSR minimizes variations in exposure related to sample position in the rack. Samples are loaded from the top of the reactor through a tube into the RSR using a specimen lifting device. A design feature provides the option of using pneumatic pressure for inserting and removing samples.

18 18 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 5.4 Pneumatic Tubes A pneumatic transfer system supports applications using short-lived radioisotopes. The in-core terminus of the system is normally located in the outer ring of fuel element positions, with specific in-core sections designed to support thermal and epithermal irradiations. The sample capsule is conveyed to a sender-receiver station via pressure differences in the tubing system. An optional transfer box permits the sample to be sent and received to three different sender-receiver stations. One station is in the reactor confinement, one is in a fume hood in a laboratory room, and the third operates in conjunction with an automatic sample changer and counting system.

5.5 Beam Port Facilities Five neutron beam ports penetrate the concrete biological shield and reactor water tank at core level. Specimens may be placed inside a beam port or outside the beam port in a neutron beam from the beam port. The beam ports were designed with different characteristics to accommodate a wide variety of experiments. Shielding reduces radiation levels outside the concrete biological shield to safe values when beam ports are not in use. Beam port shielding is configured with an inner shield plug, outer shield plug, lead-filled shutter, and circular steel cover plate. A neutron beam coming from a beam port may be modified by using collimators, moderators and/or neutron filters. Collimators are used to limit beam size and beam divergence. Moderators and filters are used to change the energy distribution of neutrons in beams (e.g., cold moderator).

BP #5 . ... . BP #1 Figure 5-2, Beam Ports 19 19 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 5-2, Dimensions of Standard Beam Ports BP# 1, BP#2, BP#4 At Core 6 in. 15.24 cm At Exit 8 in. 20.32 cm BP #3, BP#5 At Core 6 in. 15.24 cm 8 in. 20.32 cm 10 in. 25.40 cm At Exit: 16 in. 40.64 cm 5.5.1 Beam Port 1 (BP1)

BP1 is connected to BP5, forming a through port. The through port penetrates the graphite reflector tangential to the reactor core, as seen in Figure 5-2. This configuration allows introduction of specimens adjacent to the reactor core to gain access to a high neutron flux from either side of the concrete biological shield, and can provide beams of thermal neutrons with relatively low fast-neutron and gamma-ray contamination.

A reactor-based slow positron beam facility is being fabricated at BP 1. The facility (Texas Intense Positron Source) will be one of a few reactor-based slow positron beams in the world.

The Texas Intense Positron Source consists of a copper source, a source transport system, a combined positron moderator/remoderator assembly, a positron beam line and a sample chamber.

The copper source will be irradiated in the middle section of the through port (BP 1-BP5).

The isotope 6 4 Cu formed by neutron capture in 6 3 Cu (69 % in natural copper) has a half life of 12.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br />, with the branching ratio for 13+ emission of 19 %.. A source transport system in a 4 meter aluminum system will be used to move the source to the irradiation location and out of the biological shield. The source will be moved away from the neutron beam line outside the biological shielding to an ultra high vacuum (at around 10-10 torr) chamber, where the moderator assembly is located. High energy positrons from the source will be slowed down to a few eV by a tungsten foil moderator that also acts as a remoderator to reduce the beam size to enable beam transport to a target for experimentation. The beam will be electrostatically guided to deliver about 108 positrons/sec in the energy range of 0 - 50 keV.

5.5.2 Beam Port 2 (BP2)

BP2 is a tangential beam port, terminating at the outer edge of the reflector. A void in the graphite reflector extends the effective source of neutrons into the reflector for a thermal neutron beam with minimum fast-neutron and gamma-ray backgrounds. Tangential beams result in a "softer" (or lower average-) energy neutron beam because the beam consists of scattered reactor neutrons. BP2 is configured to support neutron depth profiling applications.

Neutron Depth Profiling (NDP) Some elements produce charged particles with characteristic energy in neutron interactions. When these elements are distributed near a surface, the particle 20 20 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report energy spectrum is modulated by the distance the particle traveled through the surface. NDP uses this information to determine the distribution of the elements as a function of distance to the surface.

5.5.3 Beam Port 3 (BP3)

BP3 is a radial beam port. BP3 pierces the graphite reflector and terminates at the inner edge of the reflector. This beam port permits access to a position adjacent to the reactor core, and can provide a neutron beam with relatively high fast-neutron and gamma-ray fluxes. BP3 contains the Texas Cold Neutron Source Facility, a cold source and neutron guide system.

.m i Bo1 inshit~r

- C~uvsw~bon-- thitsalm

,-- *a~maagmile comt~~lr Figure 5-4, Prompt Gamma Focused-Neutron Activation Analysis Facility Texas Cold Neutron Source. The TCNS provides a low background subthermal neutron beam for neutron reaction and scattering research. The TCNS consists of a cooled moderator, a heat pipe, a cryogenic refrigerator, a vacuum jacket, and connecting lines. The TCNS uses eighty milliliters of mesitylene moderator, maintained by the cold source system at *3 6 K in a chamber within the reactor graphite reflector. A three-meter aluminum neon heat pipe, or thermosyphon, is used to cool the moderator chamber. The heat pipe working fluid evaporates at the moderator chamber and condenses at the cold head.

Cold neutrons from the moderator chamber are transported by a 2-in-long neutron guide inside the beam port to a 4-in-long neutron guide (two 2-in sections) outside the beam port. Both neutron guides have a radius of curvature equal to 300 m. All reflecting surfaces are coated with Ni-5 8. The guide cross-sectional areas are separated into three channels by 1-mm-thick vertical walls that block line-of-sight radiation streaming.

Prompt-Gamma Neutron Activation Analysis (PGNAA) Characteristic gamma radiation is produced when a neutron is absorbed in a material. PGNAA analyzes gamma radiation to 21 21 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report identify the material and concentration in a sample. PGNAA applications include: i) determination of B and Gd concentration in biological samples which are used for Neutron Capture Therapy studies, ii) determination of H and B impurity levels in metals, alloys, and semiconductor, iii) multi-element analysis of geological, archeological, and environmental samples for determination of major components such as Al, 5, K, Ca, Ti, and Fe, and minor or trace elements such as H, B, V, Mn, Co, Cd, Nd, Sm, and Gd, and iv) multi-element analysis of biological samples for the major and minor elements H, C, N, Na, P, 5, Cl, and K, and trace elements like B and Cd.

1.E+01 1.E-01Cl**!

C= 1.E-02 1.E-03 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 Energy [keV]

Figure 5-3, PGAA Spectra of Carbon Composite Flywheel Prompt Gamma Focused-Neutron Activation Analysis Facility The UT-PGAA facility utilizes the focused cold-neutron beam from the Texas Cold Neutron Source. The PGAA sample is located at the focal point of the converging guide focusing system to provide an enhanced reaction rate with lower background at the sample-detector area as compared to other facilities using filtered thermal neutron beams. The sample handling system design permits the study of a wide range of samples and quick, reproducible sample-positioning.

5.5.4 Beam Port 4 (BP4)

BP4 is a radial beam port that terminates at the outer edge of the reflector. A void in the graphite reflector extends the effective source of neutrons to the reactor core. This configuration is useful for neutron-beam experiments which require neutron energies higher than thermal energies. BP4 is currently not used due to space limitations created by shielding for BP5.

5.5.5 Beam Port 5 (BPS)

A Neutron Radiography Facility is installed at BPS (Figure 5-5). Neutrons from BPS illuminate a sample. The intensity of the exiting neutron field varies according to absorption and scattering characteristics of the sample. A conversion material generates light proportional to the intensity of the neutron field as modified by the sample.

22 22 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Reactor IleotCollimator co*Firs Second Collimao Collimator Figure 5-5, Neutron Radiography System The conversion material is integral in one imaging system at the NETL; there are two independent conversion devices available at the NETL. A Micro-Channel Plate image intensifying technology system (NOVA Scientific) is characterized by high resolution (up to 30 gtm) over a small (approximately 1/22 in.) field of view. A larger image can be obtained using a more conventional 7X7 in. 2 6 LiF/ZnS scintillation screen.

A conversion screen mounted on a video tube provides a direct single in one neutron radiography camera at the NETL. The image produced by the independent conversion apparatuses can be recorded in one of three available digital cameras. Cameras include a charge injection device (CID) camera, a cryogenically cooled charge coupled device (CCD) camera, and an electronically cooled CCD camera. The digital image is captured in a computer, where image analysis software produces the final product.

In 2015, the conventional imaging system was temporarily moved to BP3 due to the loss of use of BP5.

5.6 Other Experiment and Research Facilities The NETL facility makes available several types of radiation facilities and an array of radiation detection equipment. In addition to the reactor, facilities include a subcritical assembly, various radioisotope sources, machine produced radiation fields, and a series of laboratories for spectroscopy and radiochemistry.

5.6.1 Subcritical Assembly A subcritical assembly of 20% enriched uranium in a polyethylene moderated cylinder provides an experimental device for laboratory demonstrations of neutron multiplication and neutron flux mcasurements. A full critical loading of fuel previously at the Manhattan College Zero Power Reactor is currently at the facility.

23 23 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report 5.6.2 Radioisotopes Radioisotopes are available in a variety of quantities. Alpha, beta, and gamma sources generally in microcurie to millicurie quantities are available for calibration and testing of radiation detection equipment. Neutron sources of plutonium-beryllium and californium-252 are available. Laboratories provide locations to setup radiation experiments, test instrumentation, prepare materials for irradiation, process radioactive samples and experiment with radiochemical reactions.

5.6.3 Radiation Producing Machines The NETL houses a 14-MeV neutron generator. The generator is available for high-energy neutron activation analysis and various other applications.

5.6.4 Support Laboratories There are several laboratories adjacent to the reactor. One laboratory supports sample and standards preparation. Labs are also used for various types of radio assay, with one dedicated to a receiving station for rabbit system operations and sample counting. A control system permits automated operations.

The DOE is anticipating a loss of nuclear workforce with limited prospects for replacement of radio chemists in the national laboratory system. Therefore, a graduate-level radiochemistry laboratory was developed with support from the Department of Energy (DOE). The laboratory consists of state-of-the-art Alpha Spectroscopy Systems, Liquid Scintillation Counting System and several High Resolution Gamma Counting Systems. Students are encouraged to develop skills and interests that make them viable replacements for the nuclear workforce.

5.7 Experiment Facility Utilization Figure 5-1 provides the number of hours of reactor operation allocated to experiments in the applicable facility. There were 409 hours0.00473 days <br />0.114 hours <br />6.762566e-4 weeks <br />1.556245e-4 months <br /> utilized for experiments in 2015. In addition, operations supported irradiation in more than one experiment facility simultaneously for 39.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />. Therefore, total time for reactor operations was 560.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br />. The number of operating hours allocated to experiments includes the "console key on" time.

24 24 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report F%!..?L a.!.....

2015 Operating Hours LuisI[rlUUl~OO NAA RSR Maintenance Classroom and Operator 16% -

Training Tour*%

and ,...

Pulses B4 1% 0%

I BPS JI 0%

SPb3L BP2 BP1 1% 0%

Figure 5-1, Utilization of Experiment Hours 5.8 Nuclear Program Faculty Activities Projects and publications associate with the NETL during 2015 are provided below.

Table 5.4, Publications - 2015 PUBLICATIONS Schneider, E. A., Kung, S., Britt, P., Gill, G. Bonheyo, G., Dai, S., Hay, B., Janke, C., Jeters, R.,

Khangaonkar, T., Kuo, L., Long, W., Mayes, R., Park, J., Rao, L., Saito, T., Tsouris, T., Wang, T., and J. Wood, "Seawater Uranium Recovery by a Polymeric Adsorbent: Development, Characterization and Economics," Proceedingsof URAM 2014: InternationalSymposium on Uranium Raw Materialfor the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Exploration, Mining, Production,Supply and Demand, Economics and Environmental Issues, InternationalAtomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, (2015) (to appear).

Landsberger, S., "Neutron Activation Analysis of Solid Foods", Handbook of Mineral Elements in Foods: Chemistry, Analysis and Food Composition; Chapter 17, pp 375-390, eds. Miguel de la Guardia and Salvador Garrigues, John Wiley & Sons 2015.

http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd- 11186543 66.html Tsoulfanidis, N. and S. Landsberger Measurement and Detection of Radiation, Fourth Edition, CRC Press (2015). http ://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/978 1482215496 Landsberger, S., Lara, R. and S. G. Landsberger, "Non-Destructive Determination of Uranium, 25 25 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 5.4, Publications - 2015 Thorium and 4 °K in Tobacco and their Implication on Radiation Dose Levels to the Human Body", Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 167, 243-246 (2015).

Milisap, D. W., M. E. Cournoyer, S. Landsberger, J. Tesmer and Y. Wang, "Degradation of Nylon 6,6 Fire Suppression Casing From Plutonium Gloveboxes Under Alpha and Neutron Irradiation" Polymer Nuclear Technology, 191, 106-112 (2015).

Palomares, R. I., K. Dayman, S. Landsberger, S.R. Biegalski, C. Z. Soderquist, A.J. Casella, M.C. Brady Raap, and J. M. Schwantes "Measuring the Noble Metal and Iodine Composition of Extracted Noble Metal Phase from Spent Nuclear Fuel Using Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis" App. Radiat. Isotop. 98, 66-70 (2015).

Milisap, D. W and S. Landsberger, "Self-Attenuation as a Function of Gamma-Ray Energy in Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material from Oil Exploration", App. Radiat. Isotop. 97, 21-23 (2015).

Abuhanil, W. A., N. Dasgupta-Schubert, L. M. Villasefior, C. Johnston, D. Garcia Avila, ,M. C.

Sufirez, S.E. Borj as, S.A. Alexander, S. Landsberger, and L. Sufirez. "Naturally Occurring Heavy Radioactive Elements in The Geothermal Microcosm of The Los Azufres (Mexico) Volcanic Complex", J. Environ. Radioact., 139, 33-42, (2015).

Dietz, T.C., Tomaszewski, C. E., Tsinas, Z., Poster, D., Barkatt, A., Adel-Hadadi, M., Bateman, F., Cumberland, L.T., Schneider, E.A., Gaskell, K., LaVerne, J. and M. A1-Sheikhly, "Uranium removal from seawater by means of polymeric fabrics grafted with diallyl oxalate through a single-step, solvent-free process," Industrialand Engineering Chemistry Research, invited contribution, published online December 4 (2015).

Gurecky, W. L., Schneider E. A. and D. Ballew, "Reduced Order Modeling of Flashing Two-phase Jets," Nuclear Engineeringand Design, 294, 1, 60-72, December (2015).

Flicker Byers, M. and E. A. Schneider, "Optimization of the Passive Recovery of Uranium from Seawater," Industrialand Engineering Chemistry Research, invited contribution, published online November 19 (2015).

Peterson, J., and Pryor, M., "Automated industrial manufacturing in hazardous glovebox environments," Proceedings of the ANS Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, November, 2015.

Das, S., Liao, W-P., Tsouris, C., Janke, C. J., Mayes, R.T., Flicker Byers, M., Schneider, E.A.,

Kuo, L-J., Gill, G. and S. Dai, "Alternative Alkaline Conditioning of Amidoxime based Adsorbent for Uranium Extraction from Seawater," Industrialand Engineering Chemistry Research, invited contribution, published online October 18 (2015).

Zelenak, A., Peterson, C., Thompson, J., and Pryor, M., "The advantages of velocity control for reactive robot motion," Proceeding of the ASME Dynamics Systems and Control Conference, Columbus, OH, October, 2015.

Zelenak, A., and Pryor, M., "Stabilization of nonlinear systems by switched Lyapunov function,"

Proceedingof the ASME Dynamics Systems and Control Conference, Columbus, OH, October, 2015.

Pryor, M., and O'Neil, B., "Autonomous mobile system for inventory and inspection tasks in 26 26 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 5.4, Publications - 2015 hazardous environments," 2 nd workshop on robotics and automation in nuclearfacilities at the JEEE/RSJInternationalConference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Hamburg, Germany, September, 2015.

Silverstrim, K. J., Schneider, B. A. and C. van der Hoeven, "Image Optimization in Digital Dental Radiography," Health Physics Journal, 108, 6, 580-591, June (2015).

Hashem, J., and Pryor, M., "Performing neutron imaging of mock uranium fuel rods with a robotic manipulator," Proceedingsof the ANS Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, June, 2015.

Fetter, S. and B. A. Schneider, "The New York Times was wrong; Russian uranium deals don't threaten world supply security," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May 19 (2015).

Olsen,K.B., Kirkham R.R., Woods,V.T., Haas,D.H ,Hayes,J.C., Bowyer, .W., Mendoza, D.P.,

Lowrey,J.D. , Lukins,C.D., Suarez,R.D., Humble,P.H., Ellefson,M.D, Ripplinger,M.D.,

Zhong,L., Mitroshkov,A.V., Aalseth,C.E., Prinke, A.M., Mace, E.K., Mclntyre, J.I., Stewart, T.L., Mackley, R.D., Milbrath,B.D., Emer,D.F., Biegalski,S.R., "Noble Gas Migration Experiment to Support The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Verification" accepted to the Journal of Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, April 2015.

Lindner, H. and E. A. Schneider, "Review of Cost Estimates for Uranium Recovery from Seawater," Energy Economics, 49, 9-22, May (2015).

Dayman, K., Biegalski, S. ; Haas, D. ,Prinke, A. , Stave, S. "Evaluation of Independent and Cumulative Fission Product Yields with Gamma Spectroscopy" submitted to the Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, April 2015.

C. Johnson , Justin Lowrey , Derek Haas, Steven Biegalski "Examination of Local Atmospheric Transport of Radioxenon in the Ottawa River Valley" submitted to the Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, April 2015.

Hans, D.A., Biegalski, S.R., Bowyer, T.W., Hayes, J.C., Lowrey, J.D., Olsen, K.B. "Production of Radioxenon and Radioargon Sources for ues in Simulation of Gas Release from and Underground Nuclear Test" submitted to the Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, April 2015.

Klingberg, F.J., Biegalski, S.R. ,Prinke, A. , Haas, D., Lowrey, J. "Analysis of Non-Traditional Radioxenon Isotopes" submitted to the Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, April 2015.

Lowrey, J.D., Hans, D.A., Biegalski, S.R. "Consideration of Impact of Atmospheric Intrusion in Subsurface Sampling for Investigation of Suspected Underground Nuclear Explosions" submitted to the Journal of Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, April 2015.

Thoreson, G. G., Schneider, E. A., Armstrong, H. A. and C. van der Hoeven, "The Application of Neutron Transport Green's Functions to Threat Scenario Simulation," IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 62, 1, 236-249, February (2015).

Van der Hoeven, C., Schneider, B. A. and L. Leal, "Generation of Improved Isotopic Molybdenum Covariances from Elemental Cross Section Data Using SAMMY," Nuclear Science and Engineering 179, 1-21, January (2015).

27 27 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 5.4, Publications - 2015 Schneider, E. A., Flicker, M. and X. Zhu, "Technology Cost and Systems Analysis," Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Fuel Resources Program Meeting, Oak Ridge, TN, January 13 (2015).

REFEREED CONFERENCE & JOURNAL PROCEEDINGS Biegalski, S.R., Tipping, T.N., Klingberg, F.J., "Preparation of Radioxenon and Radioargon Mixed Sources for IFE 2014" Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, DOI 10.1007/s 10967-015-4398-5, 2015.

Lowrey, J.D., Johnson, C.M., Biegaiski, S.R., Haas, D.A. "Investigation of Dynamic Natural Backgrounds for Discrimination in Soil-Gas after a Nuclear Explosion" accepted to the Journal of Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, 2015.

F.J. Klingberg, S. Biegalski, "Improvements in High Purity Radioxenon Sample Preparation and Analysis", Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemisty,304(3), 1145-1152, (2015).

W.H. Wilson, S.R. Biegalski, C. Johnson, D. Haas, J. Lowrey, "Cosmic-Ray Induced Production of Radioactive Noble Gases in the Atmosphere, Ground, and Seawater," Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, 305:183-192 (2015). (Role: Project PI, student advisor, and data analysis)

C. Johnson, S. Biegalski, J. Lowrey, and D. Haas, "Local Transport of Radioxenon Released from the Chalk River Laboratories Medical Isotope Facility," Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, 305:183-192 (2015) (Role: Project P1, student advisor, and data analysis)

K. Dayman, S. Biegalski, "Determination of Short-Lived Fission Product Yields with Gamma Spectroscopy," Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, 205:213-223 (2015). (Role:

Project PI, student advisor, and data analysis).

F. J. Klingberg, S. R. Biegalski, D.A. Haas, A. Prinke, " 12 7Xe coincidence decay analysis in support of CTBT Verification," Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, 305( 1), 225-232 (2015). (Role: Project P1, student advisor, and data analysis)

R.I. Palomares, K.J. Dayman, S. Landsberger, S.R. Biegalski, C.Z. Soderquist, A.J. Casella, M.C. Brady Ranp, J.M. Schwantes, "Measuring the Noble Metal and Iodine Composition of Extracted Noble Metal Phase from Spent Nuclear Fuel Using Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis," Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 98, 66-70, 2015. (Role: student advisor, experimental design, and data analysis).

C. Johnson, S. Biegalski, H. Armstrong, W. Wilson, "Examination of radioargon production by cosmic neutron interactions," Environmental Radioactivity, 140, 123-129, 2015. (Role: Project P1, student advisor, and data analysis)

J.D. Lowrey, A.G. Osborne, S.R. Biegalski, M.R. Deinert, "Comparison of numerically stable methods for implementation of a double-porosity model with first order reaction terms,"

Transport in Porous Media, 106 (1), 33-45, 2015. (Role: Project PI, student advisor, and review of data.)

W. H. Wilson, S. R. Biegalski "Evaluating the Feasibility of a Simple Experiment to Validate the Existence of a Low-Energy Component to the 4 °Ca(n,at)37Ar Reaction Cross-Section,"

28 28 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 5.4, Publications - 2015 Transactionsof the American Nuclear Society, Vol. 112, 2015.

Phathanapirom, U. B. and E. A. Schneider, "Hedging Strategies in Fuel Cycle Decision-making,"

Transactionsof the American Nuclear Society, 113, Washington DC, November (2015).

Phathanapirom, U. B. and E. A. Schneider, "A Method for Hedging Against Uncertainties in Nuclear Futures," in Proceedings of GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paper 5307, Paris, France, September (2015).

Phathanapirom, U. B. and E. A. Schneider, "Resource Intensities of the Back End of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle," in Proceedingsof GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paper 5269, Paris, France, September (2015).

Bagdatlioglu, C., Morneau, R., Knapp, C., and E. A. Schneider, "The Revolver Reactor Feasibility Study," in Proceedings of GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paper 5243, Paris, France, September (2015).

Flanagan, R., Bagdatlioglu, C. and E. A. Schneider, "Multidimensional Cross Section Library Interpolation for the Bright-lite Reactor Modeling Software," in Proceedings of GLOBAL 2015 -

Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paper 5304, Paris, France, September (2015).

Morneau, R., Schneider, E. A. and C. Forsberg, "Potential Benefits of Energy Storage Using Texas as a Case Study," in Proceedings of GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paper 5256, Paris, France, September (2015).

Byers, M. and E. A. Schneider, "Sensitivity of Seawater Uranium Cost to System and Design Parameters," in Proceedings of GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paris, France, September (2015).

Boldon, L., Sabharwall, P., Schneider, E., A., and L. Liu, "Study of the Parameters that Influence Small Modular Reactor Investment Costs," Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, 112, San Antonio, TX, June (2015).

Bagdatlioglu, C., Schneider, E., A., and R. Flanagan, "Using Spatial Flux Calculations to Improve the Fluence-Based Neutron Balance Approach," Transactionsof the American Nuclear Society, 112, San Antonio, TX, June (2015).

Flanagan, R. R., and E. A. Schneider, "Cyclus Graphical User Interface User Experience Testing," Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, 112, San Antonio, TX, June (2015).

Reimers, A., Schneider, E. A., M. Flicker and J. Morton, "Desalination Applications of 10 MWe Toshiba 4S," Transactionsof the American Nuclear Society, 112, San Antonio, TX, June (2015).

Forsberg, C. and E. A. Schneider, "Variable Electricity from Base-load Nuclear Power Plants Using Stored Heat," in Proceedingsof InternationalConference on Advances in Power Plants (JCAPP) 2015, Paper 15125, Nice, France, May (2015).

Phathanapirom, U. B. and E. A. Schneider, "Hedging Against Uncertainty in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle," in Proceedingsof InternationalHigh Level Radioactive Waste Management (IHLR WM) 2015, Charleston, SC, April (2015).

ORAL PRESENTATIONS 29 29 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 5.4, Publications - 2015 Tsai,C-H., Deetjen, T., Gulen, G., Mann, N., Morneau, R. and E. A. Schneider, "Long-term Simulation for ERCOT 2030," UT-Austin Energy Institute Full Cost of Electricity Project Review Meeting, Austin, TX, December 14 (2015).

Phathanapirom, U. B. and E. A. Schneider, "Hedging Strategies in Fuel Cycle Decision-making,"

American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting, Washington DC, November 10 (2015).

Schneider, B. A., "Recovery of Uranium from Seawater: Technologies, Economics, and Prospects," MIT Energy Initiative Seminar Series, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, October 13 (2015).

Schneider, E. A. and U. B. Phathanapirom, "Hedging Against Uncertainty in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle," Nuclear Engineering Departmental Seminar Series, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, October 7 (2015).

Tsouris, C., Liao, W-P., Das, S., Mayes, R., Janke, C., Dai, S., Kuo, L-J., Wood, J., Gill, G.,

Flicker Byers, M., and B. A. Schneider, "Adsorbent Alkali Conditioning for Uranium Adsorption from Seawater: Adsorbent Performance and Technology Cost Evaluation," Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report FCRD-20 15 -M2FT- 15OR03 10042, September (2015).

Phathanapirom, U. B. and B. A. Schneider, "A Method for Hedging Against Uncertainties in Nuclear Futures," GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paris, France, September 21 (2015).

Phathanapirom, U. B. and E. A. Schneider, "Resource Intensities of the Back End of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle," GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paris, France, September 24 (2015).

Bagdatlioglu, C., Morneau, R., Knapp, C., and E. A. Schneider, "The Revolver Reactor Feasibility Study," GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paris, France, September 23 (2015).

Morneau, R., Schneider, E. A. and C. Forsberg, "Potential Benefits of Energy Storage Using Texas as a Case Study," GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paris, France, September 22 (2015).

Byers, M. and E. A. Schneider, "Sensitivity of Seawater Uranium Cost to System and Design Parameters," GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paris, France, September 23 (2015).

Montgomery, M., Schneider, B. A. and C. Torres-Verdin, "Preliminary laboratory measurements of neutron capture cross-section and neutron-induced hgamma spectroscopy of fluid and saturated rock samples," The University of Texas at Austin, 1 5 th Annual Formation Evaluation Research Consortium Meeting, August 17 (2015).

Schneider, B. A., Byers, M. and X. Zhu, "Technology Cost and Systems Analysis: University Collaborations," University of Maryland, Fuel Resources Program Meeting, College Park, MD, August 7 (2015).

Schneider, B. A., Byers, M. and X. Zhu, "Technology Cost and Systems Analysis," University of 30 30 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 5.4, Publications - 2015 Maryland, Fuel Resources Program Meeting, College Park, MD, August 6 (2015).

Schneider, E. A. and U. B. Phathanapirom, "Simulating Flexibility: Hedging Against Uncertainty in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle," University of Wisconsin-Madison, July 24 (2015).

Schneider, E. A., Dixon, B., Ganda, F., Harrison, T. J., Hoffman, B., Williams, K., Wood, T.,

Feng, B., "Cost Correlations: Examples and Implementation," Vanderbilt University, 4 th Annual EPRI-Vanderbilt Nuclear Fuel Cycle Assessment Workshop, Nashville, TN, July 22 (2015).

Schneider, B. A., Morneau, R., "Grid Modeling in PLEXOS: Case Study of Nuclear-Renewable Compatibility on the Texas ERCOT Grid," Massachusetts Institute of Technology, US-Japan Joint Study on the Future of Nuclear Energy First Workshop, Cambridge, MA, June 19 (2015).

Boldon, L., Sabharwall, P., Schneider, E., A., and L. Liu, "Study of the Parameters that Influence Small Modular Reactor Investment Costs," American Nuclear Society Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, June 10 (2015).

Bagdatlioglu, C., Schneider, B., A., and R. Flanagan, "Using Spatial Flux Calculations to Improve the Fluence-Based Neutron Balance Approach," American Nuclear Society Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, June 9 (2015).

Flanagan, R. R., and E. A. Schneider, "Cyclus Graphical User Interface User Experience Testing," American Nuclear Society Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, June 9 (2015).

Reimers, A., Schneider, E. A., M. Flicker and J. Morton, "Desalination Applications of 10 MWe Toshiba 4S," American Nuclear Society Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, June 8 (2015).

Schneider, B. A., "Options and Cost Analysis Methods for Research Reactor Spent Fuel Management," International Atomic Energy Agency, 1st RCM for the IAEA Coordinated Research Project on Options and Technologies for Managing the Back End of the Research Reactor Nuclear Fuel Cycle, Vienna, Austria, June 9 (2015).

Forsberg, C. and E. A. Schneider, "Variable Electricity from Base-load Nuclear Power Plants Using Stored Heat," International Conference on Advances in Power Plants (ICAPP) 2015, Nice, France, May 4 (2015).

Phathanapirom, U. B. and E. A. Schneider, "Hedging Against Uncertainty in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle," International High Level Radioactive Waste Management (IHLRWM) 2015, Charleston, SC, April 15 (2015).

Schneider, E. A., Flicker, M., Chen, X., and H. Lindner, "Cost assessment for the recovery of uranium from seawater via a textile adsorbent," 2 4 9 th American Chemical Society National Meeting, Denver, CO, March 23 (2015).

31 31 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 6.0 FACILITY OPERATING SUMMARIES 6.1 Operating Experience The UT-TRIGA reactor operated for 409 hours0.00473 days <br />0.114 hours <br />6.762566e-4 weeks <br />1.556245e-4 months <br /> on 124 days in 2015, producing a total energy output of 196.4 MW-hrs. The history of operations over the past 24 years of facility operation is provided in Figures 6-1 and 6-2. As illustrated, operating time has shown a marked increase from the first several years and has been relatively stable for the past decade. Varying research requirements over the past few years have led to a decrease in total energy generation.

250

"* 2O00

~P 150 I..

E 0 Z 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 Year of Operation 35.00 30.00 S 25.00 920.00 U15.00 10.00 4'

2 5.00 0.00 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 Year of Operation Figure 6-2, Energy Generation 6.2 Unscheduled Shutdowns Reactor safety system protective actions are classified as limiting safety system (LSSS) trip, a limiting condition for operation (LCO) trip or a trip of the SCRAM manual switch. The use of the manual scram switch in normal reactor shutdowns is not a protective action. The following definitions in Table 6.1 classify the types of protective actions recorded.

32 32 2/2016

2015 NEIL Annual Report Table 6.1, Protective Action Definitions Protective Action Description Safety System Setting Automatic shutdown actuated by detection of limiting LSS S safety system setting such as fuel temperature or percent power Condition for Operation Automatic shutdown actuated by detection of a LCO - (analog detection) limiting condition for operation within a safety channel or the instrument control and safety system such as pool water level, a loss of detector high voltage or an external circuit trip Condition for Operation Automatic shutdown actuated by software action LCO - (digital detection) detecting inoperable conditions within a program function of the instrument control and safety system such as watchdog timers or program database errors Manual Switch Manually initiated emergency shutdown (protective action)

Table 6.2 lists 3 unscheduled shutdowns that occurred in 2015, all of which were initiated by the reactor safety system.

Table 6.2, SCRAM Log for 2015 Date Time Type Comments 02/04/2015 15:14 SCRAM FT1 Thermocouple, Intermittent Failure 05/08/20 15 13:38 SCRAM FTl Thermocouple, Intermittent Failure 05/19/2015 15:11 SCRAM FTi Thermocouple, Intermittent Failure 06/16/2015 14:32 SCRAM Manual TRO operator error 07/02/2015 14:11 SCRAM FT1 Thermocouple, Intermittent Failure 12/10/2015 14:50 SCRAM %NP, DAC, Intermittent Failure, Playback showed max 4%,

%NPP 3% NP, NPP respectively 12/15/2015 12:26 SCRAM FT1 Thermocouple, Intermittent Failure There were five temperature channel trips in 2015 related to thermocouple intermittent signal failure. In all cases, time dependent data indicates fuel temperatures were normal and dile trips occurred because of signal transients not indicative of actual fuel temperature. Attempts to isolate the trip to a specific component or recreate the failure have not been successful. The failure mode is conservative and acceptable until either the channel fails in a more consistent mode or the characteristics leading to the actuations can be identified.

There was one error by an operator in training responding to an alert that did not require operator action. The action was in a conservative manor. Operations and experiments were not disrupted.

There was an intermittent NP, NPP high percent power on startup. Playback revealed the highest powers recorded were 4% and 3% on the NP and NPP respectively. Reactor power was above criticality but below the point of adding heat. Thorough inspection of DAC component and values was performed satisfactorily. Playback was thoroughly analyzed by two SROs and post 33 33 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report scram checks were performed satisfactorily. The issue was logged and deemed intermittent.

Regular operations resumed.

6.3 Utilization Utilization of the NETL reactor facility is near the maximum possible under a 5-day per week schedule. The main categories of facility utilization include education, undergraduate research, graduate research, and external research collaborations. Table 6.3 lists the external research collaborations at NETL since 2009. Facility usage is largely dominated by the use of nuclear analytical techniques for sample analysis. These techniques include neutron activation analysis, neutron radiography, neutron depth profiling, and prompt gamma activation analysis.

Table 6.3, NETL External Research Collaborations since 2009 External Collaborator Location Facility Utilization Trinitek Services, Inc. Sandia Park, NM Soil sample analysis Gatineau, Quebec, Environment Canada Arctic air filter analysis Canada Bridgeport Instruments Austin, TX Radiation detector development Carollo Engineering Austin, TX Radiation damage studies Evergreen Solar Marlboro, MA Silicon wafer trace element analysis Kaizen Innovations Georgetown, TX Soil sample analysis Idaho National Laboratory Idaho Falls, ID Isotope production Illinois State Geological Champaign, IL Water sample analysis Survey UT Biology Austin, TX Soil sample analysis Department of Geological Austin, TX Geological sample irradiation Sciences Los Alamos National Los Alamos, NM Sample irradiations Laboratory Lolodine, LLC Jersey City, NJ Nut Analysis UT Health Science Center Houston, TX Nanoparticle analysis Pacific Northwest National Richland, WA Isotope Production Laboratory RMT, Inc. Madison, WI Water sample analysis Material irradiations and shrapnel Signature Science Austin, TX analysis Biomedical Engineering Austin, TX Tissue sample analysis Department Plant sample analysis and student Southwestern University Georgetown, TX laboratories Comprehensive Nuclear-Vienna, Austria Radioxenon production Test-Ban Treaty Organization Clarkson University Potsdam, NY Air filter analysis JWK Corporation Annandale, VA Sample irradiations Civil and Environmental Austin, TX Fly ash sample analysis Engineering Department National Center for Energy, Rabat, Morocco Soil sample analysis 34 34 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 6.3, NF*TL External Research Collaborations since 2009 External Collaborator Location Facility Utilization Science and Nuclear Technologies Nanospectra Biosciences, Inc. Houston, TX Tissue sample analysis U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Rockville, MD Reactor operations training Commission NTS Albuquerque, NM Isotope production Omaha Public Power District Blair, NE Boral coupon analysis TEKLAB Collinsville, IL Water sample analysis XIA Hayward, CA Radioxenon production Lawrence Livermore Livermore, CA Isotope production National Laboratory Angelo State University San Angelo, TX Motor oil sample analysis UT Bureau of Economic Austin, TX NORM analysis Geology Duracell Bethel, CT Material analysis Eckert & Ziegler Analytics Atlanta, GA Isotope production Freescale Semiconductor Austin, TX Detector development International Atomic Energy Vienna, Austria Nuclear security training Agency Various activation and analysis services were carried out in support of the overall UT mission and for public service. Analytical service work was performed for outside agencies. There were 585 samples irradiated during 2015 as illustrated in Figure 6-4. Nearly half of these were pneumatic tube system, a quarter of the total samples were RSR facility and the rest were mostly BP-3 PGAA irradiations and few 3L irradiations. Beam lines 1, 2, and 4 have not been utilized in a few years. BP-5 operations were suspended in 2014 due to leak. Due to repair of the BP1-5 bellows, experiments were suspended for approximately five months, leading to the decrease in sample irradiations. While the pneumatic system led to more samples, the nature of the experiments led to BP-3, the TCNS, being a majority of the actual operating time. Some of these experiments included shielding analysis, hydrogen embrittlement, and investigation into the thermal absorption characteristics of Ar-37.

35 35 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report Number of Samples Irradiated Each Year for a 10-Year Trend 3500 ,

3000 isooo E

• .50 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Year Figure 6-4, NETL Sample Activation 6.4 Routine Scheduled Maintenance All surveillances and scheduled maintenance activities were completed during the reporting year at the required frequencies. All results met or exceeded the requirements of the Technical Specifications.

6.5 Corrective Maintenance Activities this reporting period predominately consisted of adjustment and replacement of radiation monitor components, pool water system components, room confinement system components and periodic maintenance due to wear. All replacements were done in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59. Corrective maintenance activities included the replacement of individual components or assemblies with like or similar replacement parts. The following list is a summary of the corrective maintenance activities accomplished by facility staff:

• Replacement of beam line bellows

• Repair of BP-3 HPGE auto fill detector

• Replacement of purification system ion exchanger resin

• Replacement of purification filters as needed

• Replacement of Particulate CAM GM tube

• Replacement of QNX computer power supply 36 36 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report

• Replaced NM- 100 power supplies (5VDC, ++/-15VDC)

• Replaced electrolytic capacitors in NM- 1000 preamp

• Replaced Shim #1 drive gear shaft pin 6.6 Facility Changes During the 2015 calendar year, changes in the facility and staffing are included below. These include a number of operator changes.

6.6.1 Staff changes:

During the 2015 calendar year, changes in the facility staffing included the graduation of two reactor operators, one will not be retaining a license and the other reports during each quarter to help in the facility and meet training requirements. A senior reactor operator has returned and is fully qualified; in addition, a new senior reactor operator has been initially licensed and qualified.

6.6.2 Facility changes Facility changes in in 2015 principally included replacement of obsolete parts. During 2015 enhancements to the existing facility access control and security monitoring systems supported by the Global Threat Reduction Initiative (DOE/NNSA) continued. Facility modifications included the upgrading and addition of security systems for the reactor facility. A mass spectrometer was added to the list of experimental facilities.

6.6.3 Procedure revision/updates There were neither procedure revisions nor updates made in 2015 6.6.4 Facility Changes Accomplished in Accordance with Other Regulatory Requirements:

There were no changes the license, or Technical Specifications.

Proposed or Pending Changes:

Some Technical Specifications and license changes have been proposed and submitted to the USRNC for final review and approval, including:

i. A set of changes for clarification and correction of terminology, ii. A request for a license amendment/revision to permit byproduct and source material under the control and used by the reactor facility to support reactor operations to be controlled under the reactor license, iii. A request to define initial startup, and iv. A request to require an operator at the controls when the reactor is not secured (currently required when the reactor is not shutdown).

37 37 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report In 2011, a request for renewal of the facility operating license was made, with notification by the USNRC that the UT facility meets requirements for operation under "timely renewal." Work to address requests for additional information is in progress.

6.7 Oversight & Inspections Inspections of laboratory operations are conducted by university and licensing agency personnel.

Two committees, a Radiation Safety Committee and a Reactor Oversight Committee review operations of the NETL facility. The Reactor Oversight Committee convened on the dates listed in Table 6.4.

Table 6.4, Reactor Oversight Committee Reviews First Quarter None Second Quarter 21 April 2015 Third Quarter None Fourth Quarter 22 October 2015 Inspections by licensing agencies include federal license activities by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Nuclear Reactor Regulation Branch (NRR), and state license activities by the Texas Department of State Health Services (TDSHS) Radiation Control Program. Licensing agency inspections conducted in calendar year 2015 are indicated in Table 6.5. No findings of significance were identified.

Table 6.5, License Inspections License Dates R-129 31 August 2015 to 3 September 2015 SNM- 180 None L00485 (89) None Routine inspections by the Office of Environmental Health and Safety (OEHS) for compliance with university safety rules and procedures are conducted at varying intervals throughout the year. In response to safety concerns at other sites on the main campus, several additional OEHS inspections have been made. Inspections cover fire, chemical, and radiological hazards. No significant safety problems were found at NETL, which reflects favorably on the positive safety culture for all hazard classes at the NETL. Safety concerns included such items as storage of combustibles, compressed gases, and fire extinguisher access.

38 38 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 7.0 RADIOLOGICAL

SUMMARY

7.1 Summary of Radiological Exposures The Radiation Protection Program for the NETL facility provides monitoring for personnel radiation exposure, surveys of radiation areas and contamination areas, and measurements of radioactive effluents as indicated in Table 7.1. Site area measurements include exterior points adjacent to and distant from the building.

Table 7.1, Radiation Protection Program Requirements and Frequencies Frequency Radiation Protection Requirement Weekly Gamma survey of all Restricted Areas.

Swipe survey of all Restricted Areas.

Response check of the continuous air monitor.

Response checks of the area radiation monitors.

Monthly Gamma surveys of exterior walls and roof.

Exchange personnel dosimeters & interior area monitoring dosimeters.

Review dosimetry reports.

Response check emergency locker portable rad. measuring equipment.

Review Radiation Work Permits.

Response check of the argon monitor.

Response check hand and foot monitor.

As Required Process and record solid wastes and liquid effluent discharges.

Prepare and record radioactive material shipments.

Survey and record incoming radioactive materials.

Perform and record special radiation surveys.

Issue radiation work permits, provide HP coverage for maintenance operations.

Conduct orientations and training.

Neutron surveys following shielding changes Quarterly Exchange environmental monitoring dosimeters.

Gamma and swipe surveys of all non-restricted areas.

Collect and analyze TRIGA pool water Swipe survey of building exterior areas.

Semi-Annual Calibrate continuous air monitor, argon monitor, area rad.

monitors.

Leak test and inventory sealed sources.

Annual Inventory emergency lockers Conduct ALARA Committee meeting.

Calibrate portable radiation monitoring instruments.

Calibrate personnel pocket dosimeters.

Calibrate emergency locker portable radiation detection equipment 39 39 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 7.2 Summary of Radioactive Effluents The radioactive effluent paths are ventilation for air-borne radionuclides, and the sanitary sewer system for liquid radionuclides. The most significant airborne radionuclide effluent is argon-41.

Two other airborne radionuclides, nitrogen-16 and oxygen-19, decay rapidly and do not contribute to effluent releases. Argon-4 1, with a half-life of 109 minutes, is the only airborne radionuclide emitted by the facility during normal operations.

7.2.1 Released There were no releases of solid radioactive materials during calendar year 2015. A small quantity of radioactive waste is stored for decay or aggregation for a shipment.

7.2.2 Discharged Airborne Releases. A differential pressure control system in the facility assures airborne radioactive releases are controlled. The reactor room is ventilated by a general area system, and a sub-system to collect and discharge argon-4 1 generated from routine reactor operations. There were 1.96x 106 jCi of argon-4 1 discharged during calendar year 2015 which is approximately 2%

of the value permitted by Technical Specifications.

Liqiuid Discharges. There are no routine releases from the facility associated with reactor operation. Large liquid-volume radioactive waste may be captured in holding tanks, where liquid radioactive waste may be held for decay or processed to remove the radioactive contaminants as appropriate. Small quantities of liquid scintillation cocktail or dilute concentrations below the limits of 10 CFR 20 in the NETL laboratories may be disposed directly to the sanitary sewer.

Liquid disposals are infrequent.

Approximately 250 liters of water contaminated with tritium and approximately 0.5 liters of water contaminated with Co-60 was discharged to the sanitary sewer in 2015. The average concentration was orders of magnitude below the limits of 10OCFR20 for discharge to sewerage, with total discharge approximately 80 btCi.

7.4 Environmental Surveys Performed Outside the Facility NETL monitors exterior locations indicated as positions 1 through 6 on the exterior dosimeter map. For 2015, "minimal" doses (< 1 mrem) were reported for all positions except position 3 for 2015. The dose for position 3 was "minimal" for the first three quarters of 2015. During the fourth quarter, the dose was 15 mrem due to fuel movement required for repair of the leaking bellows. This is well below the 100 mrem annual limit for dose to the general public.

40 40 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report NZTh 5ervico 4o.~r PARK ING Figure 7-1, NETL Environmental Monitor Locations In addition to the NETL monitors, the Texas Department of State Health Services monitors exterior locations near NETL indicated as positions 1 through 5 on the TDSHS TLD map. The reported doses for 2015 were:

• Position 1 - 1 mrem

• Position 2 - 3 mrem

• Position 3 - 2 mrem

• Position 4 - 12 mrem

• Position 5 - 6 mrem 41 41 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report i

Go ~gIc maps NEIL ltD location.

~ ~r UTNu~ Er~g~n~g Th~i~tg C ~I *< 1/2t > V t~

? 1W ~mt

? rLI~1~t~

, RD ~ ~

, ltD ~*d

? RD ~4 ~Mt~

, E~uM S~n~ ~n ~ E SE V

~t~i e~

? Ba~ 1W k.f at~

42 42 2/20 16

The University of Texas at Austin Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 2015 Annual Report NRC Docket 50-602 DOE Contract No. DE-AC07-ER03919 03/02/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report

.... eparrme lr of Mec h nical En~igineering

,..,,..** **TI-I UNIVERSI'FY OF* TEXAS AT AUSTIN

'**,;,;4,*:*."

.::*r: ,* ,....; Nucl'ar Fnr,'ineceinq, fi'achiuit Laboraioy, Austin. *kx'as 78758.

"**:t*'*s"*"u

.. "FX 512-47M-589" .512-232-.5370-hIpltwwusuz.uteaas~edu/-neti/nteihiml FORWARD The mission of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laborato1ry at The University of Texas at Austin is to:

• Educate the next generation of leaders in nuclear science and engineering.

aConduct leading research at the forefront of the international nuclear community.

• Apply nuclear technology for solving multidisciplinary problems.

,, Provide service to the citizens of Texas, the U.S., and the international community.

This objective is achieved by carrying out a well-balanced program of education, research, and service. The NETL research reactor supports hands-on education in reactor physics and nuclear science, In addition, students in non-nuclear fields such as physics, chemistry, and biology use the reactor in laboratory course work. The NETL is also used in education programs for nuclear power plant personnel, secondary schools students and teachers, and the general public.

T[he NETL research reactor benefits a wide range of on-campus and off-campus users.

including academic, medical, industrial, and government organizations. The principal services offered by our reactor involve material irradiation. trace element detection, material analysis. and radiographic analysis of objects and processes. Such services establish beneficial links to off-campus users, expose faculty and students to multidisciplinary research and commercial applications of nuclear science, and gencrate resources to help support Nuclear E.ngineering activities.

Steven lBiegaiski, Ph.D., P.E3.

Director, Nuclear Engineering T'eachingz Laboratory ii ii2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Table of Contents Table of Contents iii Executive Summary v 1.0 NUCLEAR ENGINEERING TEACHING LABORATORY ANNUAL REPORT 1 1.1 General 1 1.2 Purpose of the report 1 2.0 ORGANIZATION AND ADMINSTRATION 3 2.1 Level 1 4 2.2 Level 2 5 2.3 Level 3 8 2.4 Level 4 10 2.5 Other Facility Staff 10 2.6 Faculty and Facility users 10 2.7 NETL Support 12 3.0 FACILITY DESCRIPTION 13 3.1 NETL History 13 3.2 NETL SITE, J.J. Pickle Research Campus 13 3.3 NETL Building Description 13 4.0 UT-TRIGA MARK II RESEARCH REACTOR 15 4.1 Reactor Core 15 4.2 Reactor Reflector 16 4.3 Reactor Control 16 5.0 EXPERIMENT AND RESEARCH FACILITIES 18 5.1 Upper Grid Plate 7L and 3L Experiment Facilities 18 5.2 Central Thimble 18 5.3 Rotary Specimen Rack 18 5.4 Pneumatic Tubes 19 5.5 Beam Port Facilities 19 5.6 Other Experiment and Research Facilities 23 5.7 Experiment Facility Utilization 24 5.8 Nuclear Program Faculty Activities 25 6.0 OPERATING

SUMMARY

32 6.1 Operating Experience 32 6.2 Unscheduled Shutdowns 32 6.3 Utilization 34 6.4 Routine Scheduled Maintenance 36 6.5 Corrective Maintenance 36 6.6 Facility Changes 37 6.7 Oversight & Inspections 38

°°° 111 iii 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report 7.0 RADIOLOGICAL

SUMMARY

39 7.1 Summary of Radiological Exposures 40 7.2 Summary of Radioactive Effluents 40 7.3 Radiological Exposure Received by Facility Personnel and Visitors 40 7.4 Environmental Surveys Performed Outside the Facility 40 iv iv 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

The Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory (NETL) facility supports the academic and research missions of The University of Texas, and provides these support functions to other institutions. The environmental research and analysis services performed by the NETL during the past year have been used to support Idaho National Laboratories, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Environment Canada, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization, and numerous corporate clients.

V V2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 1.0 NUCLEAR ENGINEERING TEACHING LABORATORY ANNUAL REPORT The Nuclear Engineering Laboratory Annual Report covers the period from January through December 2015. The report includes descriptions of the organization, NETL facilities, the reactor, experiment and research facilities and summaries of operations and radiological impact.

1.1 General The NETL facility serves a multipurpose role, with the primary function as a "user facility" for faculty, staff, and students of the Cockrell School of Engineering. The NETL supports development and application of nuclear methods for researchers from other universities, government organizations and industry. The NETL provides nuclear analytic services to researchers, industry, and other laboratories for characterization, testing and evaluation of materials. The NETL provides public education through tours and demonstrations.

igure 1-1, NETL - Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Activities at NETL are regulated by Federal and State agencies. The nuclear reactor is subject to the terms and specifications of Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) License R-129, a class 104 research reactor license. A second NRC license for special nuclear materials, SNM- 180, authorizes possession of a subcritical assembly, neutron sources, and various equipment. The NETL is responsible for administration and management of both licenses. Activities at the University using radioisotopes are conducted under a State of Texas license, L00485. Functions of the broad license are the responsibility of the University Office of Environmental Health and Safety.

1.2 Purpose of this Report This report meets requirements of the reactor Technical Specifications and the Department of Energy Fuels Assistance program, and provides an overview of the education, research, and service programs of the NETL for the calendar year 2015.

1 12/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 1.2.1 TRIGA II Reactor Technical Specifications The NETL TRIGA II reactor Technical Specifications (section 6.6.1) requires submission of an annual report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Table 1.1 correlates specified requirements to the report.

Table 1.1, TRIGA Mark II Technical Specification and the Annual Report Specification Section A narrative summary of reactor operating experience including the energy 5.,6163 produced by the reactor or the hours the reactor was critical, or both.5.,6163 The unscheduled shutdowns & corrective action taken to preclude recurrence 6.2 Major preventive & corrective maintenance operations with safety significance 6.4 Major changes in the reactor facility and procedures, tabulation of new tests or experiments, or both, significantly different from those performed previously, 6.6 including conclusions that no unreviewed safety questions were involved A summary of radioactive effluents (nature & amount) released or discharged to the environs beyond effective control of the university as determined at or before the point of such release or discharge, including to the extent practicable an 7.

estimate of individual radionuclides present in the effluent or a statement that the estimated average release after dilution or diffusion is less than 25% of the concentration allowed or recommended A summary of exposures received by facility personnel and visitors where such exposures are greater than 25% of that allowed or recommended.7.

A summarized result of environmental surveys performed outside the facility 7.4 1.2.2 The Department of Energy Fuels Assistance Program The DOE University Fuels Assistance program (DE-AC07-05ID 14517, subcontract 00078206) supports the facility for utilization of the reactor in a program of education and training of students in nuclear science and engineering, and for faculty and student research. The contract requires an annual progress report in conjunction with submittal of a Material Balance Report and Physical Inventory Listing report. Specific technical details of the report (listed in Table 1.2) are sent under separate cover to the DOE with this Annual Report.

Table 1.2, DOE Reactor Fuel Assistance Report Requirements Fuel usage (grams Uranium 235 & number of fuel elements)

Inventory of unirradiated fuel elements in storage Inventory of fuel elements in core Inventory of useable irradiated fuel elements outside of core Projected 5-year fuel needs Current inventory of other nuclear material items with DOE-ID project identifier (i.e., "J")

Point of contact for nuclear material accountability 2 22/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 2.0 ORGANIZATION AND ADMINSTRATION The University of Texas System (UTS) was established by the Texas Constitution in 1876, and currently consists of eight academic universities and six health institutions. The UTS mission is to provide high-quality educational opportunities for the enhancement of the human resources of Texas, the nation, and the world through intellectual and personal growth.

The Board of Regents is the governing body for the UTS. It is composed of members appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. Terms are of six years each and staggered, with the terms of three members expiring on February 1 of odd-numbered years. Current members of the current Board of Regents are listed in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1 The University of Texas Board for 2015 Paul L. Foster, Chairman Jeffery Hildebrand, Vice Chairman R. Steven Hicks, Vice Chairman Members with term set to expire May 2016 Student Regent Nash M. Home Members with term set to expire February 2017 Regent Alex M. Cranberg Regent Wallace L. Hall, Jr.

Regent Brenda Pejovich Members with term set to expire February2019 Chairman Paul L. Foster Vice Chairman R. Steven Hicks Regent David J. Beck Regent Sara Matrinez Tucker http://www.utsystem.edulboard-of-regents/current-regents, 02/26/2016 The chief executive officer of the UTS is the Chancellor. The Chancellor has direct line responsibility for all aspects of UTS operations, and reports to and is responsible to the Board of Regents. The current Chancellor and Staff are listed in Table 2.2.

Table 2.2 University of Texas System Chancellor's Office William H. McRaven, Chancellor David E. Daniel, PhD, Deputy Chancellor http://www.utsystem.edu/chancellor, 02/26/2016 UT Austin is the flagship campus of the UTS. The facility operating license for the TRIGA Mark II at the NETL is issued to the University of Texas at Austin. Figure 2-1 reflects the organizational structure for 4 levels of line management of the NETL reactor, as identified in the Technical Specifications, as well as oversight functions. Other NETL resources (in addition to line management positions) include staff with specialized functions, and faculty and facility 3 32/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report users. NETL support is through a combination of State allocation, research programs, and remuneration for service.

Prscdoo E of t tgheeigea DieprstmenofTeIa Reacorustriin Radiation Safety PuleroEninosngtean Officer ] Laboratory.Director

[i§3ealhPami]t Reactor Supervisor

.... Oper ation Staff ......

Reactor & Senior Operators Figure 2-1, Organizational Structure for the University of Texas at Ausitn TRILGA Reactor 2.1 Level 1 Personnel Level 1 represents the central administrative functions of the University and the Cockrell School of Engineering. The University of Texas at Austin is composed of 16 separate colleges and schools; the Cockrell School of Engineering manages eight departments with individual degree programs. The Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory (NETL) is one of several education and research functions within the School. Current Level 1 personnel are reported in Table 2.3.

2.1 .1 President, University of Texas at Austin The President is the individual vested by the University of Texas system with responsibility for the University of Texas at Austin.

2.1.2 Executive Vice president and Provost (Provost)

Research and educational programs are administered through the Office of the Executive Vice President and Provost. Separate officers assist with the administration of research activities and 4 42/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report academic affairs with specific management functions delegated to the Dean of the Cockrell School of Engineering and the Chairman of the Mechanical Engineering Department.

2.1.3 Dean of the Cockrell School of Engineering The Dean of the Cockrell School of Engineering reports to the Provost. The School consists of 8 departments and undergraduate degree programs and 12 graduate degree programs.

2.1.4 Department of Mechanical Engineering Chairman The Chairman reports to the Dean of the Cockrell School of Engineering. The Department manages 8 areas of study, including Nuclear and Radiation Engineering.

Table 2.3 The University of Texas at Austin Administration (Level 1)

William Powers Jr., JD, President Greg L. Fenves, PhD, President Judith H. Langlois, PhD, Interim Executive Vice Presidetn and Provost Gregory L. Fenves, PhD, Dean, Cockrell School of Engineering Wood, Sharon, PhD, (interim) Dean, Cockrell School of Engineering Jayathi Murthy, Chair of Department of Mechanical Engineering 2.2 Level 2 Personnel The Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory operates as a unit of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas. Level 2 personnel are those with direct responsibilities for administration and management of resources for the facility, including the Chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department, the NETL Director and Associate Director.

Oversight roles are provided at Level 2 by the Radiation Safety Committee, the Radiation Safety Officer and the Nuclear Reactor Committee. The current complement of Level 2 personnel is reported along with the NETL facility staff and the Nuclear and Radiation Engineering program faculty in Table 2.4.

Table 2.4 Facility Staff & NRE Faculty NETL Facility Staff NRE Faculty Director S. Biegalski S. Biegalski Associate Director P. M. Whaley S. Landsberger Reactor Supervisor M. Krause E. Schneider Health Physicist & Lab manager T. Tipping Administrative Associate D. Judson Electronics Technician!/Reactor Operator G. Kline N. Mohammed U. Chatterjee Health Physics Technician J. Sims 5 52/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 2.2.1 Director, Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory (NETL Director)

Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory programs are directed by an engineering faculty member with academic responsibilities in nuclear engineering and research related to nuclear applications. The Director is a member of the Cockrell School of Engineering, and the Department of Mechanical Engineering.

2.2.2 Associate Director The Associate Director is responsible for safe and effective conduct of operations and maintenance of the TRIGA nuclear reactor. Other activities performed by the Associate Director and staff include neutron and gamma irradiation service, operator/engineering training courses, and teaching reactor short courses. In addition to Level 3 staff, an Administrative Assistant and an Electronics Technician report to the Associate Director. Many staff functions overlap, with significant cooperation required.

2.2.4 Safety Oversight Safety oversight is provided for radiation protection and facility safety functions. A University of Texas Radiation Safety Committee is responsible programmatically for coordination, training and oversight of the University radiation protection program, with management of the program through a Radiation Safety Officer. Current personnel on the Radiation Safety Committee are listed in Table 2.5.

Nuclear reactor facility safety oversight is the responsibility of a Nuclear Reactor Committee; a request has been made to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to change the name "Nuclear Reactor Committee" to "Reactor Oversight Committee" to better describe the committee function for the University and avoid confusion with other NRC organizations. "Reactor Oversight Committee" will be used in this report pending approval. Current personnel on the Reactor Oversight Committee are listed on Table 2.6.

Radiation Safety Committee. The Radiation Safety Committee reports to the President and has the broad responsibility for policies and practices regarding the license, purchase, shipment, use, monitoring, disposal and transfer of radioisotopes or sources of ionizing radiation at The University of Texas at Austin. The Committee meets at least three times each calendar year. The Committee is consulted by the Office of Environmental Health and Safety concerning any unusual or exceptional action that affects the administration of the Radiation Safety Program.

Table 2.5 6 62/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Radiation Safety Committee 2013-2014 Neal E. Armstrong, Ph.D., P.E., BCEE, Vice Provost for Institutional Accreditation Geral Hoffmann, Ph.D., Professor, Department of Physics W. Scott Pennington, ex-officio, Environmental Health and Safety Rick Russell, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Molecular Biosciences John M. Salsman, CHP, Director, Environmental Health and Safety Juan M. Sanchez, Ph.D., Vice President, Research Bob G. Sanders, Ph.D., Professor, Department of Molecular Biosciences Tracy N. Tipping, CHP, Health Physicist Laboratory Manager, Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Karen M. Vasquez, Ph.D., Professor, Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology Kevin N. Dalby, Ph.D., Professor, Division of Medicinal Chemistry Texas Department of State Health Services License L00485, 02/26/20 16 Radiation Safety Officer. A Radiation Safety Officer holds delegated authority of the Radiation Safety Committee in the daily implementation of policies and practices regarding the safe use of radioisotopes and sources of radiation as determined by the Radiation Safety Committee. The Radiation Safety Officer's responsibilities are outlined in The University of Texas at Austin Radiation Safety Manual. The Radiation Safety Officer has an ancillary function rcporting to the NETL Director as required on matters of radiological protection. The Radiation Safety Program is administered through the University Office of Environmental Health and Safety.

A NETL Health Physicist (Level 3) manages daily radiological protection functions at the NETL, and reports to the Radiation Safety Officer as well as the Associate Director. This arrangement assures independence of the Health Physicist through the Radiation Safety Officer while maintaining close interaction with NETL line management.

Reactor Oversight Committee (ROC'). The Reactor Oversight Committee (formerly known as the Nuclear Reactor Committee) evaluates, reviews, and approves facility standards for safe operation of the nuclear reactor and associated facilities. The ROC meets at least semiannually.

The ROC provides reports to the Dean on matters as necessary throughout the year and submits a final report of activities no later than the end of the spring semester. The ROC makes recommendations to the NETL Director for enhancing the safety of nuclear reactor operations.

Specific requirements in the Technical Specifications are incorporated in the committee charter, including an audit of present and planned operations. The ROC is chaired by a professor in the Cockrell School of Engineering. ROC Membership varies, consisting of ex-officio and appointed positions. The Dean appoints at least three members to the Committee that represent a broad spectrum of expertise appropriate to reactor technology, including personnel external to the School.

7 72/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 2.6 ReactorOversightCommittee_2015-2016 ________

Erich Schneider (ME), Chair Ozzie Bayrak (CAEE)

Charlie Werth (CAEE)

Steven Biegalski (ME)

Lawrence R. Jacobi (External Representative)

Jodi Jenkins (External Representative)

Michael Krause, ex-officio (NETL)

Tracy Tipping, ex-officio (NETL)

Mike Whaley, ex-officio (NETL)

John G. Ekerdt, ex-officio Scott Pennington, other (Radiation Safety Officer)

Erich Schneider (ME), Chair https://www.engr.utexas.edu/faculty/committees/225-roc, 02/26/2016 2.3 Level 3 Personnel Level 3 personnel are responsible for managing daily activities at the NETL. The Reactor Supervisor and Health Physicist are Level 3. The current Reactor Supervisor and Health Physicist are listed on Table 2.4.

2.3.1 Reactor Supervisor The Reactor Supervisor function is incorporated in a Reactor Manager position, responsible for daily operations, maintenance, scheduling, and training. The Reactor Manager is responsible for the maintenance and daily operations of the reactor, including coordination and performance of activities to meet the Technical Specifications of the reactor license. The Reactor Manager plans and coordinates emergency exercises with first responders and other local support (Austin Fire Department, Austin/Travis County EMS, area hospitals, etc.).

The Reactor Manager, assisted by Level 4 personnel and other NETL staff, implements modifications to reactor systems and furnishes design assistance for new experiment systems.

The Reactor Manager assists initial experiment design, fabrication, and setup. The Reactor Manager provides maintenance, repair support, and inventory control of computer, electronic, and mechanical equipment. The Administrative Assistant and Reactor Manager schedule and coordinate facility tours, and support coordination of building maintenance.

2.2.1 Health Physicist The Health Physicist function is incorporated into a Laboratory Manager position, responsible for radiological protection (Health Physics), safe and effective utilization of the facility (Lab Management), and research support. Each of these three functions is described below. The Laboratory Manager is functionally responsible to the NETL Associate Director, but maintains a strong reporting relationship to the University Radiation Safety Officer and is a member of the 8 82/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Radiation Safety Committee. This arrangement allows the Health Physicist to operate independent of NETL operational constraints in consideration of radiation safety.

Health Physics. NETL is a radiological facility operating in the State of Texas under a facility operating license issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Radioactive material and activities associated with operation of the reactor are regulated by the NRC, and the uses of radioactive materials at the NETL not associated with the reactor are regulated by the Texas Department of State Health Services (TDSHS) Radiation Control Program. The NETL Health Physicist ensures operations comply with these requirements, and that personnel exposures are maintained ALARA ("as low as is reasonably achievable"). One or more part-time Undergraduate Research Assistant (URA) may assist as Health Physics Technicians.

Lab Management. The lab management function is responsible for implementation of occupational safety and health programs at the NETL. The Laboratory Manager supports University educational activities through assistance to student experimenters in their projects by demonstration of the proper radiation work techniques and controls. The Laboratory Manager participates in emergency planning for NETL and the City of Austin to provide basic response requirements and conducts off-site radiation safety training to emergency response personnel such as the Hazardous Materials Division of the Fire Department, and Emergency Medical Services crews.

Research Support. The mission of The University of Texas at Austin is to achieve excellence in the interrelated areas of undergraduate education, graduate education, research and public service. The Laboratory Manager and research staff supports the research and educational missions of the university at large, as well as development or support of other initiatives.

The Laboratory Manager is responsible for coordinating all phases of a project, including proposal and design, fabrication and testing, operation, evaluation, and removal/dismantlement.

Researchers are generally focused on accomplishing very specific goals, and the research support function ensures the NETL facilities are utilized in a safe efficient manner to produce quality data. The Laboratory Manager obtains new, funded research programs to promote the capabilities of the neutron beam projects division for academic, government and industrial organizations and/or groups.

The NETL provides unique facilities for nuclear analytic techniques, including but not limited to elemental analysis (instrumental neutron activation analysis, prompt gamma analysis),

measurements of physical characteristics (neutron depth profiling, neutron radiography) and experimental techniques investigating fundamental issues related to nuclear physics and condensed matter. Nuclear analytical techniques support individual projects ranging from class assignments to measurements for faculty research.

The Laboratory Manager manages the use of the five beam ports with the Texas Cold Neutron Source, Neutron Depth Profiling, Neutron Guide and Focusing System, Prompt Gamma Activation Analysis Neutron Radiography and Texas Intense Positron Source. Projects are supported in engineering, chemistry, physics, geology, biology, zoology, and other areas.

Research project support includes elemental measurements for routine environmental and 9 92/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report innovative research projects. The neutron activation analysis technique is made available to different state agencies to assist with quality control of sample measurements.

2.4 Level 4 Personnel Reactor Operators and Senior Reactor Operators (RO/SRO) operate and maintain the reactor and associated facilities. An RO/SRO may operate standard reactor experiment facilities as directed by the Reactor Supervisor.

2.5 Other Facility Staff In addition to the line management positions defined in Figure 2-1, NETL staff includes an Administrative Assistant, an Electronics Technician, and variously one or more Undergraduate Research Assistants assigned either non-licensed maintenance support (generally but not necessarily in training for Reactor Operator licensure) or to support the Laboratory Manager as Health Physics Technicians and/or research support.

2.6 Faculty and Facility Users The complement of faculty and facility users at the NETL is extremely variable. Functionally faculty and facility users are associated with the NETL in the capacity of academic utilization, other educational efforts, or research & service. A description of these activities follows.

2.6.1 Academic Utilization The NETL is integrated in the Nuclear and Radiation Engineering program (NRE) of Mechanical Engineering (ME). The ME faculty complement directly supporting the nuclear education program is listed in Table 2.7. Successful participation in the undergraduate program results in a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering, Nuclear Engineering certification; the degree is essentially a major in Mechanical Engineering with a minor in Nuclear Engineering. All Mechanical Engineering degree requirements must be met with an additional set of specific nuclear engineering courses successfully completed.

Table 2.7 University of Texas Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Program Faculty Dr. Steven Biegalski, Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Associate Professor Dr. Dale Klein, Associate Vice Chancellor for Research Dr. Kendra M. Foltz-Biegalski, Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Research Engineer Dr. Sheldon Landsberger, Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Professor Dr.Mitch Pryor, Robotics Research Group Research Associate Dr. Erich Schneider, Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Assistant Professor https://nuclear.engr.utexas.edulindex.php/faculty-and-staff, 02/26/2016 Of the five undergraduate Nuclear Engineering courses and the dozen graduate Nuclear Engineering courses, five courses make extensive use of the reactor facility. Table 2.8 lists the 10 10 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report courses currently in the UT course catalog, many of which use the reactor and its experiment facilities.

Table 2.8, Nuclear Engineering Courses Undergraduate ME 136N, 236N: Concepts in Nuclear and Radiological Engineering ME 337C: Introduction to Nuclear Power Systems ME3 37F: Nuclear Environmental Protection ME 337G: Nuclear Safety and Security~ll ME 361E: Nuclear Operations and Reactor Engineering ME 361iF: Radiation and Radiation protection Laboratory Graduate ME 388C: Nuclear Power Engineering ME 388D: Nuclear Reactor Theory I[]1 ME 388F: Computational Methods in Radiation Transport' 11 ME 388G: Nuclear Radiation Shielding[ 11 ME 388H: Nuclear Safety and Security' 11 ME 388J: Neutron Interactions and their Applications in Nuclear Science and Engineering[11 ME 388M: Mathematical Methods for Nuclear and Radiation Engineers* 1 1 ME 388N: Design of Nuclear Systems It" ME 388P: Applied Nuclear Physics[ 1 1 ME 388S: Modem Trends in Nuclear and Radiation Engineering~ll ME 389C: Nuclear Environmental Protection NE 389F: The Nuclear Fuel Cycle~' 1 ME 390F: Nuclear Analysis Techniques ME 390G: Nuclear Engineering Laboratory ME390T: Nuclear- and Radio-Chemistry NOTEfI], Academic courses with minimal or no use of the reactorfacilities The NRE program's graduate degrees are completely autonomous; they are Master of Science in Engineering (Concentration in Nuclear Engineering) and Doctor of Philosophy (Concentration in Nuclear Engineering). Course requirements for these degrees and the qualifying examination for the Ph.D. are separate and distinct from other areas of Mechanical Engineering. A Dissertation Proposal and Defense of Dissertation are required for the Ph.D. degree and acted on by a NRE dissertation committee.

2.6.2 Other Education Efforts The NETL has participated in the IAEA Fellowship programs for the past decade. Several Fellows and Visiting Scientists spend 3-6 months at the NETL per year.

The Nuclear Engineering Teaching Lab also extends its facilities to two Historically Black Colleges or Universities (HBCUs). Both Hutson-Tillotson University in Austin and Florida Memorial University in Miami Gardens, Florida have participated in this these educational efforts.

11 11 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report The NETL provides a reactor based training course to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, with 2 courses in 2015.

In addition to formal classes, the NETL routinely provides short courses or tours for Texas agencies, high schools and pre-college groups such as the Boy Scouts of America. Tours and special projects are available to promote public awareness of nuclear energy issues. A typical tour is a general presentation for high school and civic organizations. Other tours given special consideration are demonstrations for interest groups such as physics, chemistry and science groups.

2.6.3 Research & Service A more comprehensive description of the nuclear analytic techniques and facilities available at the NETL is provided in section 5. Personnel support for these activities includes faculty, graduate and undergraduate research assistants, and NETL staff.

2.7 NETL Support NETL funding is provided by state appropriations, research grants, and fees accrued from service activities. Research funding supplements the base budget provided by the State and is generally obtained through competitive research and program awards. Funds from service activities supplement base funding to allow the facility to provide quality data acquisition and analysis capabilities. Both sources of supplemental funds (competitive awards and service work) are important to the education and research environment for students.

12 12 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 3.0 FACILITY DESCRIPTION 3.1 NETL History Development of the nuclear engineering program was an effort of both physics and engineering faculty during the late 1950's and early 1960's. The program became part of the Mechanical Engineering Department where it currently resides. The program installed and operated the first UT TRIGA nuclear reactor in Taylor Hall on the main campus. Initial criticality for the first UT reactor was August 1963. Power at startup was 10 kilowatts with a power upgrade to 250 kilowatts in 1968. Total bumnup during the 25 year period from 1963 to final operation in April 1988 was 26.1 megawatt-days. Pulse capability of the reactor was 1.4% Ak/k with a total of 476 pulses during the operating history.

In October 1983, planning was initiated for the NETL to replace the original UT TRIGA installation. Construction was initiated December 1986 and completed in May 1989. The NETL facility operating license was issued in January 1992, with initial criticality on March 12, 1992.

Dismantling and decommissioning of the first UT TRIGA reactor facility was completed in December 1992.

3.2 NETL SITE, J.J. Pickle Research Campus Land development in the area of the current NETL installation began as an industrial site during the 1940's. Following the 1940's, lease agreements between the University and the Federal government led to the creation of the Balcones Research Center. The University became owner of the site in the 1960's, and in 1994 the site name was changed to the J.J. Pickle Research Campus (PRC) in honor of retired U.S. Congressman James "Jake" Pickle.

The PRC is a multidiscipline research campus on 1.87 square kilometers. The site consists of two approximately equal areas, east and west. An area of about 9000 square meters on the east tract is the location of the NETL building. Sixteen separate research units and at least five other academic research programs conduct research at locations on the PRC. Adjacent to the NETL site are the Center for Research in Water Resources, the Bureau of Economic Geology, and the Research Office Complex, illustrating the diverse research activities on the campus. A Commons Building provides cafeteria service, recreation areas, meeting rooms, and conference facilities.

3.3 NETL Building Description The NETL building is a 1950 sq meter (21,000 sq fi), facility with laboratory and office spaces.

Building areas consist of two primary laboratories of 330 sq m (3600 sq ft) and 80 sq m (900 sq fi), eight support laboratories (217 sq m, 2340 sq fi), and six supplemental areas (130 sq m, 1430 sq ft). Conference and office space is allocated to 12 rooms totaling 244 sq m (2570 sq fi). One of the primary laboratories contains the TRIGA reactor pool, biological shield structure, and neutron beam experiment area. A second primary laboratory consists of 1.3 meter (4.25 fi) thick walls for use as a general purpose radiation experiment facility. Other areas of the building include shops, instrument & measurement laboratories, and material handling facilities.

13 13 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report The NETL Annex was installed in 2005, a 24 by 60 foot modular class room building adjacent to the NETL building. The building provides classroom space and offices for graduate students working at the NETL.

14 14 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 4.0 UT-TRIGA MARK II RESEARCH REACTOR TRIGA is an acronym for Training, Research, Isotope production, General Atomics. The TRIGA Mark II reactor is a versatile and inherently safe research reactor conceived and developed by General Atomics to meet education and research requirements. The UT-TRIGA reactor provides sufficient power and neutron flux for comprehensive and productive work in many fields including physics, chemistry, engineering, medicine, and metallurgy REIlCTOUl E--C RG;

• - CJTRR1."'- ,ALUNINIOfUl TfINk uuHIIrBRT

• . .4..IC

• T. .l -

Fiue41 T TRIAMr I ula eeac eco Th NT U-TIA eatr s nabvegoud fie-oersac eco.Teratrcr 4.1 Core.

Reactor The reacto core is n assembl of abot-00ue

• elmet surune bya nuargaht netoelco.Fe elements are poiioe ban uppeTradlwrgi ltwt waled saNlEss sTeelG tue.ctheferrgo is an ixdcor rsalloo lwereactrThed ureanium inra metallu, 15 15 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report zirconium hydride (UZrH) matrix. Physical properties of the TRIGA fuel provide an inherently safe operation. Rapid power transients to high powers are automatically suppressed without using mechanical control; the reactor quickly and automatically returns to normal power levels.

Pulse operation, a normal mode, is a practical demonstration of this inherent safety feature.

N.t Figure 4-2, Core and Support Structure Details 4.2 Reactor Reflector.

The reflector is a graphite cylinder in a welded aluminum-canister. A 10" well in the upper surface of the reflector accommodates an irradiation facility, the rotary specimen rack (RSR), and horizontal penetrations through the side of the reflector allow extraction of neutron beams. In 2000 the canister was flooded to limit deformation stemming from material failure in welding joints. In 2004, the reflector was replaced with some modification, including a modification to the upper grid plate for more flexible experiment facilities.

4.3 Reactor Control.

The UT-TRIGA research reactor can operate continuously at nominal powers up to 1.1 MW, or in the pulsing mode with maximum power levels up to 1500 MW (with a trip setpoint of 1750 MW) for durations of about 10 msec. The pulsing mode is particularly useful in the study of reactor kinetics and control. The UT-TRIGA research reactor uses a compact microprocessor-driven control system. The digital control system provides a unique facility for performing reactor physics experiments as well as reactor operator training. This advanced system provides for flexible and efficient operation with precise power level and flux control, and permanent retention of operating data.

The power level of the UT-TRIGA is controlled by a regulating rod, two shim rods, and a transient rod. The control rods are fabricated with integral extensions containing fuel (regulating 16 16 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report and shim rods) or air (transient rod) that extend through the lower grid plate for full span of rod motion. The regulating and shim rods are fabricated from B4 C contained in stainless steel tubes; the transient rod is a solid cylinder of borated graphite clad in aluminum. Removal of the rods from the core allows the rate of neutron induced fission (power) in the UZrH fuel to increase.

The regulating rod can be operated by an automatic control system that adjusts the rod position to maintain an operator-selected reactor power level. The shim rods provide a coarse control of reactor power. The transient rod can be operated by pneumatic pressure to permit rapid changes in control rod position. The transient rod moves within a perforated aluminum guide tube.

17 17 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 5.0 EXPERIMENT AND RESEARCH FACILITIES Neutrons produced in the reactor core can be used in a wide variety of research applications including nuclear reaction studies, neutron scattering experiments, nuclear analytical techniques, and irradiation of samples. Facilities for positioning samples or apparatus in the core region include cut-outs fabricated in the upper grid plate, a central thimble in the peak flux region of the core, a rotary specimen rack in the reactor graphite reflector, and a pneumatically operated transfer system accessing the core in an in-core section. Beam ports, horizontal cylindrical voids in the concrete shield structure, allow neutrons to stream out away from the core. Experiments may be performed inside the beam ports or outside the concrete shield in the neutron beams.

Areas outside the core and reflector are available for large equipment or experiment facilities.

Current NRE and NETL personnel and active projects are tabulated at the end of this section (Table 5.4).

In addition to reactor facilities, the NETL has a subcritical assembly, various radioisotope sources, radiation producing machines, and laboratories for spectroscopy and radiochemistry.

5.1 Upper Grid Plate 7L and 3L Facilities The upper grid plate of the reactor contains four removable sections configured to provide space for experiments otherwise occupied by fuel elements (two three-element and two seven-element spaces). Containers can be fabricated with appropriate shielding or neutron absorbers to tailor the gamma and neutron spectrum to meet specific needs. Special cadmium-lined facilities have been constructed that utilize three element spaces.

5.2 Central Thimble The reactor is equipped with a central thimble for access to the point of maximum flux in the core. The central thimble is an aluminum tube extending through the central penetration of the top and bottom grid plates. Typical experiments using the central thimble include irradiation of small samples and the exposure of materials to a collimated beam of neutrons or gamma rays.

5.3 Rotary Specimen Rack (RSR)

A rotating (motor-driven) multiple-position specimen rack located in a well in the top of the graphite reflector provides for irradiation and activation of multiple samples and/or batch production of radioisotopes. Rotation of the RSR minimizes variations in exposure related to sample position in the rack. Samples are loaded from the top of the reactor through a tube into the RSR using a specimen lifting device. A design feature provides the option of using pneumatic pressure for inserting and removing samples.

18 18 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 5.4 Pneumatic Tubes A pneumatic transfer system supports applications using short-lived radioisotopes. The in-core terminus of the system is normally located in the outer ring of fuel element positions, with specific in-core sections designed to support thermal and epithermal irradiations. The sample capsule is conveyed to a sender-receiver station via pressure differences in the tubing system. An optional transfer box permits the sample to be sent and received to three different sender-receiver stations. One station is in the reactor confinement, one is in a fume hood in a laboratory room, and the third operates in conjunction with an automatic sample changer and counting system.

5.5 Beam Port Facilities Five neutron beam ports penetrate the concrete biological shield and reactor water tank at core level. Specimens may be placed inside a beam port or outside the beam port in a neutron beam from the beam port. The beam ports were designed with different characteristics to accommodate a wide variety of experiments. Shielding reduces radiation levels outside the concrete biological shield to safe values when beam ports are not in use. Beam port shielding is configured with an inner shield plug, outer shield plug, lead-filled shutter, and circular steel cover plate. A neutron beam coming from a beam port may be modified by using collimators, moderators and/or neutron filters. Collimators are used to limit beam size and beam divergence. Moderators and filters are used to change the energy distribution of neutrons in beams (e.g., cold moderator).

BP #5 . ... . BP #1 Figure 5-2, Beam Ports 19 19 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 5-2, Dimensions of Standard Beam Ports BP# 1, BP#2, BP#4 At Core 6 in. 15.24 cm At Exit 8 in. 20.32 cm BP #3, BP#5 At Core 6 in. 15.24 cm 8 in. 20.32 cm 10 in. 25.40 cm At Exit: 16 in. 40.64 cm 5.5.1 Beam Port 1 (BP1)

BP1 is connected to BP5, forming a through port. The through port penetrates the graphite reflector tangential to the reactor core, as seen in Figure 5-2. This configuration allows introduction of specimens adjacent to the reactor core to gain access to a high neutron flux from either side of the concrete biological shield, and can provide beams of thermal neutrons with relatively low fast-neutron and gamma-ray contamination.

A reactor-based slow positron beam facility is being fabricated at BP 1. The facility (Texas Intense Positron Source) will be one of a few reactor-based slow positron beams in the world.

The Texas Intense Positron Source consists of a copper source, a source transport system, a combined positron moderator/remoderator assembly, a positron beam line and a sample chamber.

The copper source will be irradiated in the middle section of the through port (BP 1-BP5).

The isotope 6 4 Cu formed by neutron capture in 6 3 Cu (69 % in natural copper) has a half life of 12.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br />, with the branching ratio for 13+ emission of 19 %.. A source transport system in a 4 meter aluminum system will be used to move the source to the irradiation location and out of the biological shield. The source will be moved away from the neutron beam line outside the biological shielding to an ultra high vacuum (at around 10-10 torr) chamber, where the moderator assembly is located. High energy positrons from the source will be slowed down to a few eV by a tungsten foil moderator that also acts as a remoderator to reduce the beam size to enable beam transport to a target for experimentation. The beam will be electrostatically guided to deliver about 108 positrons/sec in the energy range of 0 - 50 keV.

5.5.2 Beam Port 2 (BP2)

BP2 is a tangential beam port, terminating at the outer edge of the reflector. A void in the graphite reflector extends the effective source of neutrons into the reflector for a thermal neutron beam with minimum fast-neutron and gamma-ray backgrounds. Tangential beams result in a "softer" (or lower average-) energy neutron beam because the beam consists of scattered reactor neutrons. BP2 is configured to support neutron depth profiling applications.

Neutron Depth Profiling (NDP) Some elements produce charged particles with characteristic energy in neutron interactions. When these elements are distributed near a surface, the particle 20 20 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report energy spectrum is modulated by the distance the particle traveled through the surface. NDP uses this information to determine the distribution of the elements as a function of distance to the surface.

5.5.3 Beam Port 3 (BP3)

BP3 is a radial beam port. BP3 pierces the graphite reflector and terminates at the inner edge of the reflector. This beam port permits access to a position adjacent to the reactor core, and can provide a neutron beam with relatively high fast-neutron and gamma-ray fluxes. BP3 contains the Texas Cold Neutron Source Facility, a cold source and neutron guide system.

.m i Bo1 inshit~r

- C~uvsw~bon-- thitsalm

,-- *a~maagmile comt~~lr Figure 5-4, Prompt Gamma Focused-Neutron Activation Analysis Facility Texas Cold Neutron Source. The TCNS provides a low background subthermal neutron beam for neutron reaction and scattering research. The TCNS consists of a cooled moderator, a heat pipe, a cryogenic refrigerator, a vacuum jacket, and connecting lines. The TCNS uses eighty milliliters of mesitylene moderator, maintained by the cold source system at *3 6 K in a chamber within the reactor graphite reflector. A three-meter aluminum neon heat pipe, or thermosyphon, is used to cool the moderator chamber. The heat pipe working fluid evaporates at the moderator chamber and condenses at the cold head.

Cold neutrons from the moderator chamber are transported by a 2-in-long neutron guide inside the beam port to a 4-in-long neutron guide (two 2-in sections) outside the beam port. Both neutron guides have a radius of curvature equal to 300 m. All reflecting surfaces are coated with Ni-5 8. The guide cross-sectional areas are separated into three channels by 1-mm-thick vertical walls that block line-of-sight radiation streaming.

Prompt-Gamma Neutron Activation Analysis (PGNAA) Characteristic gamma radiation is produced when a neutron is absorbed in a material. PGNAA analyzes gamma radiation to 21 21 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report identify the material and concentration in a sample. PGNAA applications include: i) determination of B and Gd concentration in biological samples which are used for Neutron Capture Therapy studies, ii) determination of H and B impurity levels in metals, alloys, and semiconductor, iii) multi-element analysis of geological, archeological, and environmental samples for determination of major components such as Al, 5, K, Ca, Ti, and Fe, and minor or trace elements such as H, B, V, Mn, Co, Cd, Nd, Sm, and Gd, and iv) multi-element analysis of biological samples for the major and minor elements H, C, N, Na, P, 5, Cl, and K, and trace elements like B and Cd.

1.E+01 1.E-01Cl**!

C= 1.E-02 1.E-03 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 Energy [keV]

Figure 5-3, PGAA Spectra of Carbon Composite Flywheel Prompt Gamma Focused-Neutron Activation Analysis Facility The UT-PGAA facility utilizes the focused cold-neutron beam from the Texas Cold Neutron Source. The PGAA sample is located at the focal point of the converging guide focusing system to provide an enhanced reaction rate with lower background at the sample-detector area as compared to other facilities using filtered thermal neutron beams. The sample handling system design permits the study of a wide range of samples and quick, reproducible sample-positioning.

5.5.4 Beam Port 4 (BP4)

BP4 is a radial beam port that terminates at the outer edge of the reflector. A void in the graphite reflector extends the effective source of neutrons to the reactor core. This configuration is useful for neutron-beam experiments which require neutron energies higher than thermal energies. BP4 is currently not used due to space limitations created by shielding for BP5.

5.5.5 Beam Port 5 (BPS)

A Neutron Radiography Facility is installed at BPS (Figure 5-5). Neutrons from BPS illuminate a sample. The intensity of the exiting neutron field varies according to absorption and scattering characteristics of the sample. A conversion material generates light proportional to the intensity of the neutron field as modified by the sample.

22 22 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Reactor IleotCollimator co*Firs Second Collimao Collimator Figure 5-5, Neutron Radiography System The conversion material is integral in one imaging system at the NETL; there are two independent conversion devices available at the NETL. A Micro-Channel Plate image intensifying technology system (NOVA Scientific) is characterized by high resolution (up to 30 gtm) over a small (approximately 1/22 in.) field of view. A larger image can be obtained using a more conventional 7X7 in. 2 6 LiF/ZnS scintillation screen.

A conversion screen mounted on a video tube provides a direct single in one neutron radiography camera at the NETL. The image produced by the independent conversion apparatuses can be recorded in one of three available digital cameras. Cameras include a charge injection device (CID) camera, a cryogenically cooled charge coupled device (CCD) camera, and an electronically cooled CCD camera. The digital image is captured in a computer, where image analysis software produces the final product.

In 2015, the conventional imaging system was temporarily moved to BP3 due to the loss of use of BP5.

5.6 Other Experiment and Research Facilities The NETL facility makes available several types of radiation facilities and an array of radiation detection equipment. In addition to the reactor, facilities include a subcritical assembly, various radioisotope sources, machine produced radiation fields, and a series of laboratories for spectroscopy and radiochemistry.

5.6.1 Subcritical Assembly A subcritical assembly of 20% enriched uranium in a polyethylene moderated cylinder provides an experimental device for laboratory demonstrations of neutron multiplication and neutron flux mcasurements. A full critical loading of fuel previously at the Manhattan College Zero Power Reactor is currently at the facility.

23 23 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report 5.6.2 Radioisotopes Radioisotopes are available in a variety of quantities. Alpha, beta, and gamma sources generally in microcurie to millicurie quantities are available for calibration and testing of radiation detection equipment. Neutron sources of plutonium-beryllium and californium-252 are available. Laboratories provide locations to setup radiation experiments, test instrumentation, prepare materials for irradiation, process radioactive samples and experiment with radiochemical reactions.

5.6.3 Radiation Producing Machines The NETL houses a 14-MeV neutron generator. The generator is available for high-energy neutron activation analysis and various other applications.

5.6.4 Support Laboratories There are several laboratories adjacent to the reactor. One laboratory supports sample and standards preparation. Labs are also used for various types of radio assay, with one dedicated to a receiving station for rabbit system operations and sample counting. A control system permits automated operations.

The DOE is anticipating a loss of nuclear workforce with limited prospects for replacement of radio chemists in the national laboratory system. Therefore, a graduate-level radiochemistry laboratory was developed with support from the Department of Energy (DOE). The laboratory consists of state-of-the-art Alpha Spectroscopy Systems, Liquid Scintillation Counting System and several High Resolution Gamma Counting Systems. Students are encouraged to develop skills and interests that make them viable replacements for the nuclear workforce.

5.7 Experiment Facility Utilization Figure 5-1 provides the number of hours of reactor operation allocated to experiments in the applicable facility. There were 409 hours0.00473 days <br />0.114 hours <br />6.762566e-4 weeks <br />1.556245e-4 months <br /> utilized for experiments in 2015. In addition, operations supported irradiation in more than one experiment facility simultaneously for 39.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />. Therefore, total time for reactor operations was 560.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br />. The number of operating hours allocated to experiments includes the "console key on" time.

24 24 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report F%!..?L a.!.....

2015 Operating Hours LuisI[rlUUl~OO NAA RSR Maintenance Classroom and Operator 16% -

Training Tour*%

and ,...

Pulses B4 1% 0%

I BPS JI 0%

SPb3L BP2 BP1 1% 0%

Figure 5-1, Utilization of Experiment Hours 5.8 Nuclear Program Faculty Activities Projects and publications associate with the NETL during 2015 are provided below.

Table 5.4, Publications - 2015 PUBLICATIONS Schneider, E. A., Kung, S., Britt, P., Gill, G. Bonheyo, G., Dai, S., Hay, B., Janke, C., Jeters, R.,

Khangaonkar, T., Kuo, L., Long, W., Mayes, R., Park, J., Rao, L., Saito, T., Tsouris, T., Wang, T., and J. Wood, "Seawater Uranium Recovery by a Polymeric Adsorbent: Development, Characterization and Economics," Proceedingsof URAM 2014: InternationalSymposium on Uranium Raw Materialfor the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Exploration, Mining, Production,Supply and Demand, Economics and Environmental Issues, InternationalAtomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, (2015) (to appear).

Landsberger, S., "Neutron Activation Analysis of Solid Foods", Handbook of Mineral Elements in Foods: Chemistry, Analysis and Food Composition; Chapter 17, pp 375-390, eds. Miguel de la Guardia and Salvador Garrigues, John Wiley & Sons 2015.

http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd- 11186543 66.html Tsoulfanidis, N. and S. Landsberger Measurement and Detection of Radiation, Fourth Edition, CRC Press (2015). http ://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/978 1482215496 Landsberger, S., Lara, R. and S. G. Landsberger, "Non-Destructive Determination of Uranium, 25 25 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 5.4, Publications - 2015 Thorium and 4 °K in Tobacco and their Implication on Radiation Dose Levels to the Human Body", Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 167, 243-246 (2015).

Milisap, D. W., M. E. Cournoyer, S. Landsberger, J. Tesmer and Y. Wang, "Degradation of Nylon 6,6 Fire Suppression Casing From Plutonium Gloveboxes Under Alpha and Neutron Irradiation" Polymer Nuclear Technology, 191, 106-112 (2015).

Palomares, R. I., K. Dayman, S. Landsberger, S.R. Biegalski, C. Z. Soderquist, A.J. Casella, M.C. Brady Raap, and J. M. Schwantes "Measuring the Noble Metal and Iodine Composition of Extracted Noble Metal Phase from Spent Nuclear Fuel Using Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis" App. Radiat. Isotop. 98, 66-70 (2015).

Milisap, D. W and S. Landsberger, "Self-Attenuation as a Function of Gamma-Ray Energy in Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material from Oil Exploration", App. Radiat. Isotop. 97, 21-23 (2015).

Abuhanil, W. A., N. Dasgupta-Schubert, L. M. Villasefior, C. Johnston, D. Garcia Avila, ,M. C.

Sufirez, S.E. Borj as, S.A. Alexander, S. Landsberger, and L. Sufirez. "Naturally Occurring Heavy Radioactive Elements in The Geothermal Microcosm of The Los Azufres (Mexico) Volcanic Complex", J. Environ. Radioact., 139, 33-42, (2015).

Dietz, T.C., Tomaszewski, C. E., Tsinas, Z., Poster, D., Barkatt, A., Adel-Hadadi, M., Bateman, F., Cumberland, L.T., Schneider, E.A., Gaskell, K., LaVerne, J. and M. A1-Sheikhly, "Uranium removal from seawater by means of polymeric fabrics grafted with diallyl oxalate through a single-step, solvent-free process," Industrialand Engineering Chemistry Research, invited contribution, published online December 4 (2015).

Gurecky, W. L., Schneider E. A. and D. Ballew, "Reduced Order Modeling of Flashing Two-phase Jets," Nuclear Engineeringand Design, 294, 1, 60-72, December (2015).

Flicker Byers, M. and E. A. Schneider, "Optimization of the Passive Recovery of Uranium from Seawater," Industrialand Engineering Chemistry Research, invited contribution, published online November 19 (2015).

Peterson, J., and Pryor, M., "Automated industrial manufacturing in hazardous glovebox environments," Proceedings of the ANS Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, November, 2015.

Das, S., Liao, W-P., Tsouris, C., Janke, C. J., Mayes, R.T., Flicker Byers, M., Schneider, E.A.,

Kuo, L-J., Gill, G. and S. Dai, "Alternative Alkaline Conditioning of Amidoxime based Adsorbent for Uranium Extraction from Seawater," Industrialand Engineering Chemistry Research, invited contribution, published online October 18 (2015).

Zelenak, A., Peterson, C., Thompson, J., and Pryor, M., "The advantages of velocity control for reactive robot motion," Proceeding of the ASME Dynamics Systems and Control Conference, Columbus, OH, October, 2015.

Zelenak, A., and Pryor, M., "Stabilization of nonlinear systems by switched Lyapunov function,"

Proceedingof the ASME Dynamics Systems and Control Conference, Columbus, OH, October, 2015.

Pryor, M., and O'Neil, B., "Autonomous mobile system for inventory and inspection tasks in 26 26 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 5.4, Publications - 2015 hazardous environments," 2 nd workshop on robotics and automation in nuclearfacilities at the JEEE/RSJInternationalConference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Hamburg, Germany, September, 2015.

Silverstrim, K. J., Schneider, B. A. and C. van der Hoeven, "Image Optimization in Digital Dental Radiography," Health Physics Journal, 108, 6, 580-591, June (2015).

Hashem, J., and Pryor, M., "Performing neutron imaging of mock uranium fuel rods with a robotic manipulator," Proceedingsof the ANS Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, June, 2015.

Fetter, S. and B. A. Schneider, "The New York Times was wrong; Russian uranium deals don't threaten world supply security," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May 19 (2015).

Olsen,K.B., Kirkham R.R., Woods,V.T., Haas,D.H ,Hayes,J.C., Bowyer, .W., Mendoza, D.P.,

Lowrey,J.D. , Lukins,C.D., Suarez,R.D., Humble,P.H., Ellefson,M.D, Ripplinger,M.D.,

Zhong,L., Mitroshkov,A.V., Aalseth,C.E., Prinke, A.M., Mace, E.K., Mclntyre, J.I., Stewart, T.L., Mackley, R.D., Milbrath,B.D., Emer,D.F., Biegalski,S.R., "Noble Gas Migration Experiment to Support The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Verification" accepted to the Journal of Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, April 2015.

Lindner, H. and E. A. Schneider, "Review of Cost Estimates for Uranium Recovery from Seawater," Energy Economics, 49, 9-22, May (2015).

Dayman, K., Biegalski, S. ; Haas, D. ,Prinke, A. , Stave, S. "Evaluation of Independent and Cumulative Fission Product Yields with Gamma Spectroscopy" submitted to the Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, April 2015.

C. Johnson , Justin Lowrey , Derek Haas, Steven Biegalski "Examination of Local Atmospheric Transport of Radioxenon in the Ottawa River Valley" submitted to the Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, April 2015.

Hans, D.A., Biegalski, S.R., Bowyer, T.W., Hayes, J.C., Lowrey, J.D., Olsen, K.B. "Production of Radioxenon and Radioargon Sources for ues in Simulation of Gas Release from and Underground Nuclear Test" submitted to the Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, April 2015.

Klingberg, F.J., Biegalski, S.R. ,Prinke, A. , Haas, D., Lowrey, J. "Analysis of Non-Traditional Radioxenon Isotopes" submitted to the Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, April 2015.

Lowrey, J.D., Hans, D.A., Biegalski, S.R. "Consideration of Impact of Atmospheric Intrusion in Subsurface Sampling for Investigation of Suspected Underground Nuclear Explosions" submitted to the Journal of Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, April 2015.

Thoreson, G. G., Schneider, E. A., Armstrong, H. A. and C. van der Hoeven, "The Application of Neutron Transport Green's Functions to Threat Scenario Simulation," IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 62, 1, 236-249, February (2015).

Van der Hoeven, C., Schneider, B. A. and L. Leal, "Generation of Improved Isotopic Molybdenum Covariances from Elemental Cross Section Data Using SAMMY," Nuclear Science and Engineering 179, 1-21, January (2015).

27 27 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 5.4, Publications - 2015 Schneider, E. A., Flicker, M. and X. Zhu, "Technology Cost and Systems Analysis," Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Fuel Resources Program Meeting, Oak Ridge, TN, January 13 (2015).

REFEREED CONFERENCE & JOURNAL PROCEEDINGS Biegalski, S.R., Tipping, T.N., Klingberg, F.J., "Preparation of Radioxenon and Radioargon Mixed Sources for IFE 2014" Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, DOI 10.1007/s 10967-015-4398-5, 2015.

Lowrey, J.D., Johnson, C.M., Biegaiski, S.R., Haas, D.A. "Investigation of Dynamic Natural Backgrounds for Discrimination in Soil-Gas after a Nuclear Explosion" accepted to the Journal of Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, 2015.

F.J. Klingberg, S. Biegalski, "Improvements in High Purity Radioxenon Sample Preparation and Analysis", Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemisty,304(3), 1145-1152, (2015).

W.H. Wilson, S.R. Biegalski, C. Johnson, D. Haas, J. Lowrey, "Cosmic-Ray Induced Production of Radioactive Noble Gases in the Atmosphere, Ground, and Seawater," Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, 305:183-192 (2015). (Role: Project PI, student advisor, and data analysis)

C. Johnson, S. Biegalski, J. Lowrey, and D. Haas, "Local Transport of Radioxenon Released from the Chalk River Laboratories Medical Isotope Facility," Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, 305:183-192 (2015) (Role: Project P1, student advisor, and data analysis)

K. Dayman, S. Biegalski, "Determination of Short-Lived Fission Product Yields with Gamma Spectroscopy," Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, 205:213-223 (2015). (Role:

Project PI, student advisor, and data analysis).

F. J. Klingberg, S. R. Biegalski, D.A. Haas, A. Prinke, " 12 7Xe coincidence decay analysis in support of CTBT Verification," Journalof Radioanalyticaland Nuclear Chemistry, 305( 1), 225-232 (2015). (Role: Project P1, student advisor, and data analysis)

R.I. Palomares, K.J. Dayman, S. Landsberger, S.R. Biegalski, C.Z. Soderquist, A.J. Casella, M.C. Brady Ranp, J.M. Schwantes, "Measuring the Noble Metal and Iodine Composition of Extracted Noble Metal Phase from Spent Nuclear Fuel Using Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis," Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 98, 66-70, 2015. (Role: student advisor, experimental design, and data analysis).

C. Johnson, S. Biegalski, H. Armstrong, W. Wilson, "Examination of radioargon production by cosmic neutron interactions," Environmental Radioactivity, 140, 123-129, 2015. (Role: Project P1, student advisor, and data analysis)

J.D. Lowrey, A.G. Osborne, S.R. Biegalski, M.R. Deinert, "Comparison of numerically stable methods for implementation of a double-porosity model with first order reaction terms,"

Transport in Porous Media, 106 (1), 33-45, 2015. (Role: Project PI, student advisor, and review of data.)

W. H. Wilson, S. R. Biegalski "Evaluating the Feasibility of a Simple Experiment to Validate the Existence of a Low-Energy Component to the 4 °Ca(n,at)37Ar Reaction Cross-Section,"

28 28 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 5.4, Publications - 2015 Transactionsof the American Nuclear Society, Vol. 112, 2015.

Phathanapirom, U. B. and E. A. Schneider, "Hedging Strategies in Fuel Cycle Decision-making,"

Transactionsof the American Nuclear Society, 113, Washington DC, November (2015).

Phathanapirom, U. B. and E. A. Schneider, "A Method for Hedging Against Uncertainties in Nuclear Futures," in Proceedings of GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paper 5307, Paris, France, September (2015).

Phathanapirom, U. B. and E. A. Schneider, "Resource Intensities of the Back End of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle," in Proceedingsof GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paper 5269, Paris, France, September (2015).

Bagdatlioglu, C., Morneau, R., Knapp, C., and E. A. Schneider, "The Revolver Reactor Feasibility Study," in Proceedings of GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paper 5243, Paris, France, September (2015).

Flanagan, R., Bagdatlioglu, C. and E. A. Schneider, "Multidimensional Cross Section Library Interpolation for the Bright-lite Reactor Modeling Software," in Proceedings of GLOBAL 2015 -

Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paper 5304, Paris, France, September (2015).

Morneau, R., Schneider, E. A. and C. Forsberg, "Potential Benefits of Energy Storage Using Texas as a Case Study," in Proceedings of GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paper 5256, Paris, France, September (2015).

Byers, M. and E. A. Schneider, "Sensitivity of Seawater Uranium Cost to System and Design Parameters," in Proceedings of GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paris, France, September (2015).

Boldon, L., Sabharwall, P., Schneider, E., A., and L. Liu, "Study of the Parameters that Influence Small Modular Reactor Investment Costs," Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, 112, San Antonio, TX, June (2015).

Bagdatlioglu, C., Schneider, E., A., and R. Flanagan, "Using Spatial Flux Calculations to Improve the Fluence-Based Neutron Balance Approach," Transactionsof the American Nuclear Society, 112, San Antonio, TX, June (2015).

Flanagan, R. R., and E. A. Schneider, "Cyclus Graphical User Interface User Experience Testing," Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, 112, San Antonio, TX, June (2015).

Reimers, A., Schneider, E. A., M. Flicker and J. Morton, "Desalination Applications of 10 MWe Toshiba 4S," Transactionsof the American Nuclear Society, 112, San Antonio, TX, June (2015).

Forsberg, C. and E. A. Schneider, "Variable Electricity from Base-load Nuclear Power Plants Using Stored Heat," in Proceedingsof InternationalConference on Advances in Power Plants (JCAPP) 2015, Paper 15125, Nice, France, May (2015).

Phathanapirom, U. B. and E. A. Schneider, "Hedging Against Uncertainty in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle," in Proceedingsof InternationalHigh Level Radioactive Waste Management (IHLR WM) 2015, Charleston, SC, April (2015).

ORAL PRESENTATIONS 29 29 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 5.4, Publications - 2015 Tsai,C-H., Deetjen, T., Gulen, G., Mann, N., Morneau, R. and E. A. Schneider, "Long-term Simulation for ERCOT 2030," UT-Austin Energy Institute Full Cost of Electricity Project Review Meeting, Austin, TX, December 14 (2015).

Phathanapirom, U. B. and E. A. Schneider, "Hedging Strategies in Fuel Cycle Decision-making,"

American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting, Washington DC, November 10 (2015).

Schneider, B. A., "Recovery of Uranium from Seawater: Technologies, Economics, and Prospects," MIT Energy Initiative Seminar Series, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, October 13 (2015).

Schneider, E. A. and U. B. Phathanapirom, "Hedging Against Uncertainty in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle," Nuclear Engineering Departmental Seminar Series, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, October 7 (2015).

Tsouris, C., Liao, W-P., Das, S., Mayes, R., Janke, C., Dai, S., Kuo, L-J., Wood, J., Gill, G.,

Flicker Byers, M., and B. A. Schneider, "Adsorbent Alkali Conditioning for Uranium Adsorption from Seawater: Adsorbent Performance and Technology Cost Evaluation," Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report FCRD-20 15 -M2FT- 15OR03 10042, September (2015).

Phathanapirom, U. B. and B. A. Schneider, "A Method for Hedging Against Uncertainties in Nuclear Futures," GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paris, France, September 21 (2015).

Phathanapirom, U. B. and E. A. Schneider, "Resource Intensities of the Back End of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle," GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paris, France, September 24 (2015).

Bagdatlioglu, C., Morneau, R., Knapp, C., and E. A. Schneider, "The Revolver Reactor Feasibility Study," GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paris, France, September 23 (2015).

Morneau, R., Schneider, E. A. and C. Forsberg, "Potential Benefits of Energy Storage Using Texas as a Case Study," GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paris, France, September 22 (2015).

Byers, M. and E. A. Schneider, "Sensitivity of Seawater Uranium Cost to System and Design Parameters," GLOBAL 2015 - Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Low-Carbon Future, Paris, France, September 23 (2015).

Montgomery, M., Schneider, B. A. and C. Torres-Verdin, "Preliminary laboratory measurements of neutron capture cross-section and neutron-induced hgamma spectroscopy of fluid and saturated rock samples," The University of Texas at Austin, 1 5 th Annual Formation Evaluation Research Consortium Meeting, August 17 (2015).

Schneider, B. A., Byers, M. and X. Zhu, "Technology Cost and Systems Analysis: University Collaborations," University of Maryland, Fuel Resources Program Meeting, College Park, MD, August 7 (2015).

Schneider, B. A., Byers, M. and X. Zhu, "Technology Cost and Systems Analysis," University of 30 30 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 5.4, Publications - 2015 Maryland, Fuel Resources Program Meeting, College Park, MD, August 6 (2015).

Schneider, E. A. and U. B. Phathanapirom, "Simulating Flexibility: Hedging Against Uncertainty in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle," University of Wisconsin-Madison, July 24 (2015).

Schneider, E. A., Dixon, B., Ganda, F., Harrison, T. J., Hoffman, B., Williams, K., Wood, T.,

Feng, B., "Cost Correlations: Examples and Implementation," Vanderbilt University, 4 th Annual EPRI-Vanderbilt Nuclear Fuel Cycle Assessment Workshop, Nashville, TN, July 22 (2015).

Schneider, B. A., Morneau, R., "Grid Modeling in PLEXOS: Case Study of Nuclear-Renewable Compatibility on the Texas ERCOT Grid," Massachusetts Institute of Technology, US-Japan Joint Study on the Future of Nuclear Energy First Workshop, Cambridge, MA, June 19 (2015).

Boldon, L., Sabharwall, P., Schneider, E., A., and L. Liu, "Study of the Parameters that Influence Small Modular Reactor Investment Costs," American Nuclear Society Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, June 10 (2015).

Bagdatlioglu, C., Schneider, B., A., and R. Flanagan, "Using Spatial Flux Calculations to Improve the Fluence-Based Neutron Balance Approach," American Nuclear Society Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, June 9 (2015).

Flanagan, R. R., and E. A. Schneider, "Cyclus Graphical User Interface User Experience Testing," American Nuclear Society Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, June 9 (2015).

Reimers, A., Schneider, E. A., M. Flicker and J. Morton, "Desalination Applications of 10 MWe Toshiba 4S," American Nuclear Society Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, June 8 (2015).

Schneider, B. A., "Options and Cost Analysis Methods for Research Reactor Spent Fuel Management," International Atomic Energy Agency, 1st RCM for the IAEA Coordinated Research Project on Options and Technologies for Managing the Back End of the Research Reactor Nuclear Fuel Cycle, Vienna, Austria, June 9 (2015).

Forsberg, C. and E. A. Schneider, "Variable Electricity from Base-load Nuclear Power Plants Using Stored Heat," International Conference on Advances in Power Plants (ICAPP) 2015, Nice, France, May 4 (2015).

Phathanapirom, U. B. and E. A. Schneider, "Hedging Against Uncertainty in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle," International High Level Radioactive Waste Management (IHLRWM) 2015, Charleston, SC, April 15 (2015).

Schneider, E. A., Flicker, M., Chen, X., and H. Lindner, "Cost assessment for the recovery of uranium from seawater via a textile adsorbent," 2 4 9 th American Chemical Society National Meeting, Denver, CO, March 23 (2015).

31 31 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 6.0 FACILITY OPERATING SUMMARIES 6.1 Operating Experience The UT-TRIGA reactor operated for 409 hours0.00473 days <br />0.114 hours <br />6.762566e-4 weeks <br />1.556245e-4 months <br /> on 124 days in 2015, producing a total energy output of 196.4 MW-hrs. The history of operations over the past 24 years of facility operation is provided in Figures 6-1 and 6-2. As illustrated, operating time has shown a marked increase from the first several years and has been relatively stable for the past decade. Varying research requirements over the past few years have led to a decrease in total energy generation.

250

"* 2O00

~P 150 I..

E 0 Z 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 Year of Operation 35.00 30.00 S 25.00 920.00 U15.00 10.00 4'

2 5.00 0.00 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 Year of Operation Figure 6-2, Energy Generation 6.2 Unscheduled Shutdowns Reactor safety system protective actions are classified as limiting safety system (LSSS) trip, a limiting condition for operation (LCO) trip or a trip of the SCRAM manual switch. The use of the manual scram switch in normal reactor shutdowns is not a protective action. The following definitions in Table 6.1 classify the types of protective actions recorded.

32 32 2/2016

2015 NEIL Annual Report Table 6.1, Protective Action Definitions Protective Action Description Safety System Setting Automatic shutdown actuated by detection of limiting LSS S safety system setting such as fuel temperature or percent power Condition for Operation Automatic shutdown actuated by detection of a LCO - (analog detection) limiting condition for operation within a safety channel or the instrument control and safety system such as pool water level, a loss of detector high voltage or an external circuit trip Condition for Operation Automatic shutdown actuated by software action LCO - (digital detection) detecting inoperable conditions within a program function of the instrument control and safety system such as watchdog timers or program database errors Manual Switch Manually initiated emergency shutdown (protective action)

Table 6.2 lists 3 unscheduled shutdowns that occurred in 2015, all of which were initiated by the reactor safety system.

Table 6.2, SCRAM Log for 2015 Date Time Type Comments 02/04/2015 15:14 SCRAM FT1 Thermocouple, Intermittent Failure 05/08/20 15 13:38 SCRAM FTl Thermocouple, Intermittent Failure 05/19/2015 15:11 SCRAM FTi Thermocouple, Intermittent Failure 06/16/2015 14:32 SCRAM Manual TRO operator error 07/02/2015 14:11 SCRAM FT1 Thermocouple, Intermittent Failure 12/10/2015 14:50 SCRAM %NP, DAC, Intermittent Failure, Playback showed max 4%,

%NPP 3% NP, NPP respectively 12/15/2015 12:26 SCRAM FT1 Thermocouple, Intermittent Failure There were five temperature channel trips in 2015 related to thermocouple intermittent signal failure. In all cases, time dependent data indicates fuel temperatures were normal and dile trips occurred because of signal transients not indicative of actual fuel temperature. Attempts to isolate the trip to a specific component or recreate the failure have not been successful. The failure mode is conservative and acceptable until either the channel fails in a more consistent mode or the characteristics leading to the actuations can be identified.

There was one error by an operator in training responding to an alert that did not require operator action. The action was in a conservative manor. Operations and experiments were not disrupted.

There was an intermittent NP, NPP high percent power on startup. Playback revealed the highest powers recorded were 4% and 3% on the NP and NPP respectively. Reactor power was above criticality but below the point of adding heat. Thorough inspection of DAC component and values was performed satisfactorily. Playback was thoroughly analyzed by two SROs and post 33 33 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report scram checks were performed satisfactorily. The issue was logged and deemed intermittent.

Regular operations resumed.

6.3 Utilization Utilization of the NETL reactor facility is near the maximum possible under a 5-day per week schedule. The main categories of facility utilization include education, undergraduate research, graduate research, and external research collaborations. Table 6.3 lists the external research collaborations at NETL since 2009. Facility usage is largely dominated by the use of nuclear analytical techniques for sample analysis. These techniques include neutron activation analysis, neutron radiography, neutron depth profiling, and prompt gamma activation analysis.

Table 6.3, NETL External Research Collaborations since 2009 External Collaborator Location Facility Utilization Trinitek Services, Inc. Sandia Park, NM Soil sample analysis Gatineau, Quebec, Environment Canada Arctic air filter analysis Canada Bridgeport Instruments Austin, TX Radiation detector development Carollo Engineering Austin, TX Radiation damage studies Evergreen Solar Marlboro, MA Silicon wafer trace element analysis Kaizen Innovations Georgetown, TX Soil sample analysis Idaho National Laboratory Idaho Falls, ID Isotope production Illinois State Geological Champaign, IL Water sample analysis Survey UT Biology Austin, TX Soil sample analysis Department of Geological Austin, TX Geological sample irradiation Sciences Los Alamos National Los Alamos, NM Sample irradiations Laboratory Lolodine, LLC Jersey City, NJ Nut Analysis UT Health Science Center Houston, TX Nanoparticle analysis Pacific Northwest National Richland, WA Isotope Production Laboratory RMT, Inc. Madison, WI Water sample analysis Material irradiations and shrapnel Signature Science Austin, TX analysis Biomedical Engineering Austin, TX Tissue sample analysis Department Plant sample analysis and student Southwestern University Georgetown, TX laboratories Comprehensive Nuclear-Vienna, Austria Radioxenon production Test-Ban Treaty Organization Clarkson University Potsdam, NY Air filter analysis JWK Corporation Annandale, VA Sample irradiations Civil and Environmental Austin, TX Fly ash sample analysis Engineering Department National Center for Energy, Rabat, Morocco Soil sample analysis 34 34 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report Table 6.3, NF*TL External Research Collaborations since 2009 External Collaborator Location Facility Utilization Science and Nuclear Technologies Nanospectra Biosciences, Inc. Houston, TX Tissue sample analysis U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Rockville, MD Reactor operations training Commission NTS Albuquerque, NM Isotope production Omaha Public Power District Blair, NE Boral coupon analysis TEKLAB Collinsville, IL Water sample analysis XIA Hayward, CA Radioxenon production Lawrence Livermore Livermore, CA Isotope production National Laboratory Angelo State University San Angelo, TX Motor oil sample analysis UT Bureau of Economic Austin, TX NORM analysis Geology Duracell Bethel, CT Material analysis Eckert & Ziegler Analytics Atlanta, GA Isotope production Freescale Semiconductor Austin, TX Detector development International Atomic Energy Vienna, Austria Nuclear security training Agency Various activation and analysis services were carried out in support of the overall UT mission and for public service. Analytical service work was performed for outside agencies. There were 585 samples irradiated during 2015 as illustrated in Figure 6-4. Nearly half of these were pneumatic tube system, a quarter of the total samples were RSR facility and the rest were mostly BP-3 PGAA irradiations and few 3L irradiations. Beam lines 1, 2, and 4 have not been utilized in a few years. BP-5 operations were suspended in 2014 due to leak. Due to repair of the BP1-5 bellows, experiments were suspended for approximately five months, leading to the decrease in sample irradiations. While the pneumatic system led to more samples, the nature of the experiments led to BP-3, the TCNS, being a majority of the actual operating time. Some of these experiments included shielding analysis, hydrogen embrittlement, and investigation into the thermal absorption characteristics of Ar-37.

35 35 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report Number of Samples Irradiated Each Year for a 10-Year Trend 3500 ,

3000 isooo E

• .50 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Year Figure 6-4, NETL Sample Activation 6.4 Routine Scheduled Maintenance All surveillances and scheduled maintenance activities were completed during the reporting year at the required frequencies. All results met or exceeded the requirements of the Technical Specifications.

6.5 Corrective Maintenance Activities this reporting period predominately consisted of adjustment and replacement of radiation monitor components, pool water system components, room confinement system components and periodic maintenance due to wear. All replacements were done in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59. Corrective maintenance activities included the replacement of individual components or assemblies with like or similar replacement parts. The following list is a summary of the corrective maintenance activities accomplished by facility staff:

• Replacement of beam line bellows

• Repair of BP-3 HPGE auto fill detector

• Replacement of purification system ion exchanger resin

• Replacement of purification filters as needed

• Replacement of Particulate CAM GM tube

• Replacement of QNX computer power supply 36 36 2/20 16

2015 NETL Annual Report

• Replaced NM- 100 power supplies (5VDC, ++/-15VDC)

• Replaced electrolytic capacitors in NM- 1000 preamp

• Replaced Shim #1 drive gear shaft pin 6.6 Facility Changes During the 2015 calendar year, changes in the facility and staffing are included below. These include a number of operator changes.

6.6.1 Staff changes:

During the 2015 calendar year, changes in the facility staffing included the graduation of two reactor operators, one will not be retaining a license and the other reports during each quarter to help in the facility and meet training requirements. A senior reactor operator has returned and is fully qualified; in addition, a new senior reactor operator has been initially licensed and qualified.

6.6.2 Facility changes Facility changes in in 2015 principally included replacement of obsolete parts. During 2015 enhancements to the existing facility access control and security monitoring systems supported by the Global Threat Reduction Initiative (DOE/NNSA) continued. Facility modifications included the upgrading and addition of security systems for the reactor facility. A mass spectrometer was added to the list of experimental facilities.

6.6.3 Procedure revision/updates There were neither procedure revisions nor updates made in 2015 6.6.4 Facility Changes Accomplished in Accordance with Other Regulatory Requirements:

There were no changes the license, or Technical Specifications.

Proposed or Pending Changes:

Some Technical Specifications and license changes have been proposed and submitted to the USRNC for final review and approval, including:

i. A set of changes for clarification and correction of terminology, ii. A request for a license amendment/revision to permit byproduct and source material under the control and used by the reactor facility to support reactor operations to be controlled under the reactor license, iii. A request to define initial startup, and iv. A request to require an operator at the controls when the reactor is not secured (currently required when the reactor is not shutdown).

37 37 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report In 2011, a request for renewal of the facility operating license was made, with notification by the USNRC that the UT facility meets requirements for operation under "timely renewal." Work to address requests for additional information is in progress.

6.7 Oversight & Inspections Inspections of laboratory operations are conducted by university and licensing agency personnel.

Two committees, a Radiation Safety Committee and a Reactor Oversight Committee review operations of the NETL facility. The Reactor Oversight Committee convened on the dates listed in Table 6.4.

Table 6.4, Reactor Oversight Committee Reviews First Quarter None Second Quarter 21 April 2015 Third Quarter None Fourth Quarter 22 October 2015 Inspections by licensing agencies include federal license activities by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Nuclear Reactor Regulation Branch (NRR), and state license activities by the Texas Department of State Health Services (TDSHS) Radiation Control Program. Licensing agency inspections conducted in calendar year 2015 are indicated in Table 6.5. No findings of significance were identified.

Table 6.5, License Inspections License Dates R-129 31 August 2015 to 3 September 2015 SNM- 180 None L00485 (89) None Routine inspections by the Office of Environmental Health and Safety (OEHS) for compliance with university safety rules and procedures are conducted at varying intervals throughout the year. In response to safety concerns at other sites on the main campus, several additional OEHS inspections have been made. Inspections cover fire, chemical, and radiological hazards. No significant safety problems were found at NETL, which reflects favorably on the positive safety culture for all hazard classes at the NETL. Safety concerns included such items as storage of combustibles, compressed gases, and fire extinguisher access.

38 38 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 7.0 RADIOLOGICAL

SUMMARY

7.1 Summary of Radiological Exposures The Radiation Protection Program for the NETL facility provides monitoring for personnel radiation exposure, surveys of radiation areas and contamination areas, and measurements of radioactive effluents as indicated in Table 7.1. Site area measurements include exterior points adjacent to and distant from the building.

Table 7.1, Radiation Protection Program Requirements and Frequencies Frequency Radiation Protection Requirement Weekly Gamma survey of all Restricted Areas.

Swipe survey of all Restricted Areas.

Response check of the continuous air monitor.

Response checks of the area radiation monitors.

Monthly Gamma surveys of exterior walls and roof.

Exchange personnel dosimeters & interior area monitoring dosimeters.

Review dosimetry reports.

Response check emergency locker portable rad. measuring equipment.

Review Radiation Work Permits.

Response check of the argon monitor.

Response check hand and foot monitor.

As Required Process and record solid wastes and liquid effluent discharges.

Prepare and record radioactive material shipments.

Survey and record incoming radioactive materials.

Perform and record special radiation surveys.

Issue radiation work permits, provide HP coverage for maintenance operations.

Conduct orientations and training.

Neutron surveys following shielding changes Quarterly Exchange environmental monitoring dosimeters.

Gamma and swipe surveys of all non-restricted areas.

Collect and analyze TRIGA pool water Swipe survey of building exterior areas.

Semi-Annual Calibrate continuous air monitor, argon monitor, area rad.

monitors.

Leak test and inventory sealed sources.

Annual Inventory emergency lockers Conduct ALARA Committee meeting.

Calibrate portable radiation monitoring instruments.

Calibrate personnel pocket dosimeters.

Calibrate emergency locker portable radiation detection equipment 39 39 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report 7.2 Summary of Radioactive Effluents The radioactive effluent paths are ventilation for air-borne radionuclides, and the sanitary sewer system for liquid radionuclides. The most significant airborne radionuclide effluent is argon-41.

Two other airborne radionuclides, nitrogen-16 and oxygen-19, decay rapidly and do not contribute to effluent releases. Argon-4 1, with a half-life of 109 minutes, is the only airborne radionuclide emitted by the facility during normal operations.

7.2.1 Released There were no releases of solid radioactive materials during calendar year 2015. A small quantity of radioactive waste is stored for decay or aggregation for a shipment.

7.2.2 Discharged Airborne Releases. A differential pressure control system in the facility assures airborne radioactive releases are controlled. The reactor room is ventilated by a general area system, and a sub-system to collect and discharge argon-4 1 generated from routine reactor operations. There were 1.96x 106 jCi of argon-4 1 discharged during calendar year 2015 which is approximately 2%

of the value permitted by Technical Specifications.

Liqiuid Discharges. There are no routine releases from the facility associated with reactor operation. Large liquid-volume radioactive waste may be captured in holding tanks, where liquid radioactive waste may be held for decay or processed to remove the radioactive contaminants as appropriate. Small quantities of liquid scintillation cocktail or dilute concentrations below the limits of 10 CFR 20 in the NETL laboratories may be disposed directly to the sanitary sewer.

Liquid disposals are infrequent.

Approximately 250 liters of water contaminated with tritium and approximately 0.5 liters of water contaminated with Co-60 was discharged to the sanitary sewer in 2015. The average concentration was orders of magnitude below the limits of 10OCFR20 for discharge to sewerage, with total discharge approximately 80 btCi.

7.4 Environmental Surveys Performed Outside the Facility NETL monitors exterior locations indicated as positions 1 through 6 on the exterior dosimeter map. For 2015, "minimal" doses (< 1 mrem) were reported for all positions except position 3 for 2015. The dose for position 3 was "minimal" for the first three quarters of 2015. During the fourth quarter, the dose was 15 mrem due to fuel movement required for repair of the leaking bellows. This is well below the 100 mrem annual limit for dose to the general public.

40 40 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report NZTh 5ervico 4o.~r PARK ING Figure 7-1, NETL Environmental Monitor Locations In addition to the NETL monitors, the Texas Department of State Health Services monitors exterior locations near NETL indicated as positions 1 through 5 on the TDSHS TLD map. The reported doses for 2015 were:

• Position 1 - 1 mrem

• Position 2 - 3 mrem

• Position 3 - 2 mrem

• Position 4 - 12 mrem

• Position 5 - 6 mrem 41 41 2/2016

2015 NETL Annual Report i

Go ~gIc maps NEIL ltD location.

~ ~r UTNu~ Er~g~n~g Th~i~tg C ~I *< 1/2t > V t~

? 1W ~mt

? rLI~1~t~

, RD ~ ~

, ltD ~*d

? RD ~4 ~Mt~

, E~uM S~n~ ~n ~ E SE V

~t~i e~

? Ba~ 1W k.f at~

42 42 2/20 16