|
---|
Category:- No Document Type Applies
MONTHYEARML23192A1212023-07-0606 July 2023 FAQ 23-03 - Peach Bottom Unit 1 Unplanned Scram with Complications Interpretation ML23136A6052023-05-12012 May 2023 FAQ 23-02 Peach Bottom Performance Indicator Interpretation Request ML23023A1992023-01-20020 January 2023 ISI Owners Activity Report for the 24th Refueling Cycle Covering ISI Activities Associated with the First Period of the 5th ISI Inspection Interval for Unit 2 RS-20-140, Proposed Changes to Decommissioning Trust Agreements2020-10-30030 October 2020 Proposed Changes to Decommissioning Trust Agreements ML20008D2232020-01-0808 January 2020 NRC Region I Twitter Feeds 10-1 to 12-31-2019 ML19247D2872019-09-0404 September 2019 Fws to NRC, Concurrence That Peach Bottom License Renewal Is Not Likely to Adversely Affect the Indiana Bat or Northern Long-eared Bat ML18283B2782018-10-15015 October 2018 PBAPS PRA System Importance List ML17128A0162017-05-0808 May 2017 May 3, 2017 Peach Bottom Attendance List for Public Meeting ML16102A1152016-04-0606 April 2016 Aam Attendance List ML15113A2982015-04-23023 April 2015 Aam Attendance List, April 2015 ML15097A1142015-04-0707 April 2015 Soarca Peach Bottom 2006 Meteorological File RA-15-019, Attachment 1 - Response to the Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Schemes Pursuant to NEI 99-01, Revision 6, Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors2015-03-0202 March 2015 Attachment 1 - Response to the Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Schemes Pursuant to NEI 99-01, Revision 6, Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors ML15071A1192015-03-0202 March 2015 Attachment 1 - Response to the Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Schemes Pursuant to NEI 99-01, Revision 6, Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors ML14153A5352014-05-29029 May 2014 May 29, 2014 Aam, Attendance List ML15120A2292014-03-11011 March 2014 NRC Comments on Fpra FAQ 14-0007, Transient Fire Frequency Likelihood (4/30/2015) ML13364A2832013-12-30030 December 2013 Announcement of 2014 Generic Fundamentals Examination Administration Dates-Letter Dated Dec 30, 2013 ML13211A4032013-07-30030 July 2013 EPU LAR Supplement 6 Attachment 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information - Snpb ML13143A3312013-06-0606 June 2013 Operating Boiling-Water Reactor Licensees with Mark 1 and Mark 2 Containments Addresses List - Enclosure 2 ML13133A1482013-03-0404 March 2013 Attendee List for Peach Bottom Aam on April 18, 2013 ML12056A0522012-03-12012 March 2012 Enclosure 6 - List of Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status ML1127100332011-09-28028 September 2011 ROP Tabletop Examples and Results ML11255A3402011-08-25025 August 2011 State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (Soarca), Peach Bottom Initial Information Needs ML1117502192011-06-22022 June 2011 NRC Inspection Findings Related to Closed Cooling Water Systems (1/1/2004 to 6/22/2011) ML1110801202011-04-13013 April 2011 Public Meeting Attendance List, April 13, 2011 ML1011100692010-04-20020 April 2010 PBAPS Aam Sign-in Sheets, April 19, 2010 ML1019304602010-03-25025 March 2010 List of Historical Leaks and Spills at Us Commercial Nuclear Power Plants ML1021103752010-03-0202 March 2010 Action Request Number: 00939717, Elevated Tritium Identified in New Sample Point ML12024A0732009-03-31031 March 2009 Don Dube Comments; Soarca Secy and Associated Enclosures ML12024A0742009-03-0909 March 2009 RES Response Comments; Don Dube Comments: Soarca Secy and Associated Enclosures ML0903500432009-02-0303 February 2009 Peter Stockton Comments to NRC Public Meeting, 2/3/09 ML0816503082008-06-0909 June 2008 Annual Assessment Meeting, Sign-In Sheet ML0815003772008-04-29029 April 2008 Summary of Enhanced Monitoring of Security, Regarding Peach Bottom'S Security Officers ML0815003782008-04-29029 April 2008 Allegation Receipt Report, Regarding Allegation ML0812702892008-03-24024 March 2008 Sign-in Sheet, Pb, Security Deviation Memo, 3/24/08 ML0806704192008-03-0707 March 2008 CDBI Findings ML0804603992008-02-13013 February 2008 Power Reactor Inattentive Officer Findings 2004-Present ML0803602952008-01-23023 January 2008 Talking Points on Transition from Wackenhut/Wcbs ML0803600752008-01-23023 January 2008 Pennsylvania Senate Standing Committee Hearing Prep Book ML0803600522008-01-23023 January 2008 AR 00673505 Report, Aff Fac: Peach Bottom, AR Type: CR ML0732400242007-10-25025 October 2007 Examples of Max Thermal Power License Conditions ML0726303192007-09-14014 September 2007 P. Paquin Ltr Amendment to Certificate of Compliance No. 6574 for the Model No. 3-82B Package (TAC L24116)/ Register User List ML0726301142007-09-14014 September 2007 / P. Paquin Ltr Amendment to Certificate of Compliance No. 9208 for the Model No. 10-142B Package (TAC L24117)/S121170 ML0703000342007-01-12012 January 2007 Public Comments Submitted by E-mail: Eric Epstein, Three Mile Island Alert, Inc ML0615101792006-05-30030 May 2006 FOL Pages Associated W/License Transfer DPR-44 ML0516401312005-05-27027 May 2005 Advisory Committee Reports to AEC on Safety Aspects of Two Reactor Projects ML0516402382005-05-27027 May 2005 Paper Subject: Consultant to Dl&R, Graphite for Gas Cooled Reactors ML0505404642004-02-0909 February 2004 Dynamic Web Page Printout Dated 02/09/2004 Regarding Applied Violations for Nuclear Power Plants ML0309304702003-03-18018 March 2003 Comments on Peach Bottom SER 2023-07-06
[Table view] |
Text
Peter Stockton Comments to NRC Public Meeting, 2/3/09 Great job staff for recognizing there is a security problem at the power plants. Unfortunately, they were voted down on recent DBT increase and security information transparency issue.
We are agnostic on a policy statement. The current one states that reactor operators should not be drunk or asleep in the control room. The policy statement seems self-evident. But, the process of trying to identify these culture problems can be productive.
Problem starts at the top with NRC Commissioners o A year ago POGO interviewed each Commissioner. Some simply dont believe there is a serious terrorist threat to the nuclear power plants. One measure of this problem is the vote last week to turn down the staff recommendation to make the DBT more robust (the number of adversaries included and number of lethal weapons available to terrorists, 50 cal. Bangalore torpedoes and RPGs).
o One Commissioner made misleading and disparaging remarks to Congress about a security whistleblower in a Senate Peach Bottom hearing, that lead to an IG investigation o Recently, Commissioners voted against increasing the transparency and public information about the results of security inspections. (TA-18) o President Obama should appoint someone to the Commission who has a commitment to nuclear security. This is an opportunity to show that he is serious about his commitment to prevent nuclear terrorism.
Since 2002, POGO has interviewed or met with several hundred security officers. From those interviews, we believe security culture is a real problem.
Security officers recognize that the DBT is unrealistic and that they would be cannon-fodder in a real attack. They refer to the DBT as the Dollar Based Threat.
o BRE - are iron coffins o They know they wont get effective outside help because of timelines o They know they will be outgunned o Excessive overtime leads to lack of attentiveness o When questioned about the lame DBTNRC claims, that is all you can expect of private guard force. This is dangerous. This attitude trickles down to create a culture.
There is too much advance notice of security tests (force-on-force). There is a culture of wanting the plants to look good. Not a culture of: How well protected are the power plants? Should win overwhelmingly-no surprise, no speed, or no violence of action (the major advantages that terrorists have).
NFS/BWXT serious problems with DBT Security officers concerns are not taken seriously by the security contractor or the licensees. Security officers stop bringing up issues when nothing gets addressed. In a number of cases they are afraid to bring up issues because the fear of retaliation, including the threat to their jobs.
No real whistleblower protections.
Contractor and licensee responses to problems that are raised by saying we dont have the money or were in compliance with NRC regulations.
At Peach Bottom, security officers went to the press instead of the NRCdidnt trust the NRC Regional offices o McGaffigan experiences with Region 1 at Salem Hope Creek o Peach Bottom OIG report, no heads roll o March 2007 no safety problems, but then in September 2007, hearing about a potential video, it then became possible safety problems Enforcement/Fines $65K, sleeping guards cost NRC $500K for investigations