ML060880012
| ML060880012 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 02/06/2006 |
| From: | Valos N NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML060670557 | List: |
| References | |
| ES-401-09 | |
| Download: ML060880012 (22) | |
Text
NRC COMMENTS TO THE INITIAL EXAM SUBMITTAL INCLUDING WRITTEN EXAM COMMENTS ON ES-401-9 AND OPERATING TEST COMMENTS FOR THE D. C. COOK INITIAL EXAMINATION - FEBRUARY 2006
r JEzlZl I
iits ward KIA Only u/E/s I Explanation I X E Bank. 1) To enhance distractor A, change it to say: "Ensure incoming voltage is slightly higher than running voltage prior to closing the output breaker." 2) Distractor B is not plausible that one matches running and incoming currents prior to closing the DG output breaker. Suggest changing this to say: 'Ensure synchroscope is at the 12 o'clock position prior to closing the output breaker." This wording for the distractor would also provide for symmetly in the distractors.
RESOLUTION: Comments incomorated.
S E
Bank.
Bank. Editorial: In distractors C and D. add the word "is" before the I
word 'still". RESOLUTION: Comment incorporated.
E Bank. Edltorial: In the question stem. fully Capitalize the word "ONE" (i.e.. Which ONE of the following ...).
RESOLUTION: Comment incorporated.
X S Bank.
S Bank.
E Bank. Editorial: Fully capitalize the word "ONLY" in distractors A, B, and C. RESOLUTION: Comment incorporated.
X Bank. 1) Distractor A is not plausible that one could operate in any Mode with all ECCS LCOs satisfied , with an SI pump inoperable.
- 2) Editorial: In the question stem, fully capitalize the word "ONE" (i.e.,
Which ONE of the ...).
RESOLUTION: 1) Changed distractor A to state that it is OK to go to Mode 3, but may not proceed to Mode 2. 2) Comment incorporated.
U Bank. 1) The provided referencedoes not show the requirement to isolate the #12 SG blowdown. It appears that distractor C is also incorrect, and there is no correct answer. 2) This question should be classified at the Higher Cognitive Level instead of at the Fundamental level.
RESOLUTION: 1) Changed distractor C to state to isolate SG blowdown.
which is consistent with the calorimetric procedure.
- 2) Comment incomrated.
S Bank.
ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 Explanation be taken? to Which ONE of the
[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for a ormation regarding each of the following concepts.]
Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a t - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or t w much needless Information).
The stem or distractors contain cues (&e..clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
The answer choices are a collection of unrelated truelfalse Statements.
The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
One or more distractors is (are) pallially correct (e.9.. if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
Check the appropriate box if a job Content error is identified:
The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid WA but, as written, is not operational in content).
The question requires the recall of knowledgethat is too specific for the closed reference test m d e (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
Check questions that are sampled for conformancewith the approved WA and those that are designated SRO-only (WA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
A + in the QVcolumn indicates that question was reviewed as part of the representative sample of 30 questions.
ES-401 2 Form ES-401-9 Quad Cities May 2005 Exam
- 5. Other 6. 7.
O= ISRO UIEIS Emlanation UA ]only I I I S Bank.
lEl Bank. Editorial: In distractor D. change the first word from "Maintain" to
-Maintains." RESOLUTION: Comment incorporated.
S Bank.
X E Bank. 1) In the question stem, add another condition that states that "RCS temperatures are at 150°F". 2) In distractor D. change "reliefs" to
'relief", since there is only one RHR suction relief valve.
RESOLUTION: Comments incorporated.
S Bank.
S Bank.
U New. Need references to verify that the second sentence in distractor D is correct (i.e., concerning 120 gpm of borated RWST water).
RESOLUTION: Comment incorporated. Changed the last sentence in distractom A and D to reference 7 0 gpm" instead of '120 gpm".
X S Bank.
E Moa Ilea To make the math s mpler, change me qbest on slem IO State tnat me leakage rate s 100 gpm instead of 150 gpm, an0 lhal RCS pressJre 6 1350 ps g instead 01 1700 ps g Tnen change Ine 0 straclors 10 A) Approx 25 gpm. B) Approx 50 gpm (Correct Ansuer,.
C ) Approx 75 gpm. ana D, Approx 100 gpm RESOLUTION Comment ncorporatec S Mooiliea X I I S IBank. II I
~
S Bank.
U
W W 3 3 v)
X X X X X N
Y m
U.
N LL t
m 0 N
m N
+
W m
I N
m
3 X
X m m I Y
+
u) m
W I= W X
N N I- m (1 Y
.r m
- 0
6 7 u/us Explanation word "should to 'bould".
S Bank.
S New.
E New. In the question stem, add the words "assuming NO operator action" to the question.
RESOLUTION: Comment incorporated.
7 L Ban6 1, Distractors Aano Bare not pa~siolethat the SG PORV rao atton mon tors are on y energ zed wnen tne SG PORV opens 2 ) D stractor B an0 C are not p aus b e tnat me SG P O W rao mon tors would be mountW upstream 01 the SG PORVs on a not pope RESOLUTION 11 Replaced this pnrase witn one a s m g wnetner the mondors are reliable only n non accident conditions or also aher an accident 2) Comment incorporated Changea mountea" lo "posdioned.
E New. Editorial: In the question stem, change level will initially ..."to I...
"... levels will initially ..,".
RESOLUTION:Comment incorporated.
X E Modified. Distractors E and D state that the turbine trips, but the status of the turbine is not stated in the question stem. Suggest saying in the question stem that the turbine is at 1800 rpm and ready to go online.
RESOLUTION: Comment incorporated.
S Bank.
S Bank.
1 X S Modified.
S Bank.
U Bank. There would be overlap between this question and the actions performedduring JPM 2006-INPL 3, since the first step that the applicant would perform in the JPM would be to cycle the battery charger switch to OFF and then back to AUTO.
RESOLUTION: Replaced question (Bank, H, 2).
Iw X
I I
- 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 7.
J/E/S Explanation 6'
unit:
81 H E New. 1) Change the question stem so that there is a loss of CRlD 111 instead of CRlD 1, since otherwise one could guess that distractor B is the correct answer (loss 01 N21) without even knowing the reason why it is correct. 2) Editorial: In the question stem, fully capitalize the word "ONE" (i.0.. Which ONE of the following ...).
RESOLUTION:Comments incorporated.
Q: Question requires a reference.
82 F S Bank.
83+ H S ]Bank. II 84 H S Modified 85 H S Modified.
NOTE: Question requires a reference.
86+ H E Bank. 1) Editorial: In the question stem. add the word 'now" so that the sentence reads T h e crew has reached step 12 ...".
- 2) In the question stem. change the phrase "should be running" to "are expected to be running".
RESOLUTION:Comments incorporated.
NOTE: Question requires a reference.
87 H E Modified. In the question stem. change SG #I3 NR Level from 93% to 96%. so that the applicant is not required to know the exact setpoint of 92% as the cutoff for high SG level actions.
RESOLUTION: Comment incorporated.
88 H S Rank 89+ H U Bank. This question is assmiated with WA WE16 EA 2.2, which is not on the Written Exam Outline.
RESOLUTION: Replaced question (Bank, H, 3).
90 H E New. 1) This question should be classified at the Higher Cognitive level instead of at the Fundamental level. 2) Put the phrase "Direct the RO lo turn on the Hydrogen Igniters" in the question Stem, instead of repeating .
this phrase in-each distractor.
RESOLUTION:Comments incorporated.
91 H S New.
E 92
- Deleted mention of 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> and 7 day LCOs from the 93+
-94 95 96c 97 98 99+
100
=
DC COOK FEBRUARY 2006 INITIAL LICENSE EXAM OPERATING EXAM COMMENTS
~
Comment Resolution This JPM really has only one Critical Step (to identify that there are no misaligned rods). There is no Critical Step associated with the KIA for the JPM (KIA 2.1.25 associated with the ability to interpret graphs and tables). To make the JPM correspond t o KIA 2.1.25 and to increase the level of difficulty, make the following changes:
- 1) Change the initial rod positions so that one control rod is actually misaligned (and have the RO who filled out the form show that no control rod is misaligned).
- 2) Change the initial conditions such that one control rod was found to be untrippable during the quarterly surveillance conducted per SR 3.1.4.2.
Have the RO fill out the Incorrect Worth of a Single Stuck R o d in step 4.5.2 (use 121 pcm instead of 825 pcm, which would correspond to using the wrong graph in Figure 1.3b).
[NOTE: JPM A initially Unsatisfactory]
- 1) On page 5, it states as a Crltical Task that the :omments incorporated.
applicant identifies that the AFD has been outside the Target Band for at leaat 30 minutes. Change from for at least 30 minutes t o between 30 minutes and 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />, since only the 1230 hours0.0142 days <br />0.342 hours <br />0.00203 weeks <br />4.68015e-4 months <br /> AFD readings show two channels outside the Target Band (and the applicant could conservatively assume that there were two channels outside the Target Band for up to one hour).
- 2) Add to the second Critical Task on page 5 that the applicant identifies that a Tech Spec 3.2.3 entry is required. [Comment during onsite validation]
Change the Critical Tasks so that they are: :omments incorporated.
1)There is a sequencing error in that the fuse and breaker are taken 00s before the MCB switch is placed in LOCKOUT.
- 2) There is no tag listed for the East ESW pump discharge valve.
1
DC COOK FEBRUARY 2006 INITIAL LICENSE EXAM OPERATING EXAM COMMENTS Source Comment I Resolution Admin JPM D On page 5, change the wording of the second Comment incorporated.
sentence of the Critical Step to say: Slope of curve indicates rate of rise of leakrate exceeds 30 GPDlhr (since the lines on the graphs indicate a rate of leakrate increase of 30 GPDhr, not a leakrate of 30 GPD).
Komment durina onsite validationl Admin JPM D Delete the Table of SJAE radiation readings on the Comment incorporated.
Task BriefinQpage handed to the applicant, and instead put the readings on Data Sheet 1.
Admin JPM E On page 10, change the first Critical Task to delete Comment incorporated.
the following as Critical Tasks:
- Name
- Call Back#
Admin JPM E 1) On page 10, only one of the 4-hour 10CFR50.72 Comments incorporated.
notification boxes (Le,, either the ECCS Discharge to R C S or the RPS Actuation box is required to be checked as a Critical Step. Change the Task Briefing such that the event (stuck open SG #12 safety valve with manual safety injection) occurs in Mode 3 at full RCS temperature and pressure (instead of at 100% power), so that the applicant must identify that the 4-hour 10CFR50.72 notification box ECCS Discharge t o R C S is required to be checked as a Critical Step.
JPM A On page 4, after the sentence that states Operator Comment incorporated.
Simulator attempts to start BOTH BAPS, add the following:
Neither BAP will start
_ _ _ ~ ~
JPM A On page 5, change the last Critical Step from Comment incorporated.
Simulator raising Charging flow to L 100 gpm to raising Charging flaw to L 170 gpm, since initially Charging flow will be about 120 gpm.
lComment durina onsite validationl JPM B On page 10, the step to direct the AEO to OPEN Comment incorporated.
Simulator valve 1-IRV-60 should be a Critical Step.
2
DC COOK FEBRUARY 2006 INITIAL LICENSE EXAM OPERATING EXAM COMMENTS
- I Source Comment Resolution
- 11. JPM B In the Task Briefing, change the requirement for Comment incorporated.
Simulator the applicant t o raise SI Accumulator from 940 ff t o 945 ff t o make the level closer to normal accumulator level.
[Comment during onsite validation]
- 12. JPM B On page 9, make the step that starts the South SI Simulator pump a Critical Step, since this step is required for the successful performance of the task.
[Comment during onsite validation]
Place the CUE given on page 1 (concerning all Simulator procedural precautions and limitations being met) on the Task Briefing page also.
[Comment during onsite validation]
On page 8, in the Ctitical Step where the Operator Simulator places 2A5 Control switch in CLOSE, delete and Verifies SYNCH Permissives white light lit.
Reason: This part of the Critical Step is just a verification, and also it is a duplicate of the operator action listed iust below the Critical Stem On page 5, add a NOTE for the Evaluator that the Comment incorporated.
applicant is expected to depress the Emergency Fire System Siren Test pushbutton t o sound the fire siren. Also, add a CUE that if the applicant does not depress the pushbutton, say that one does not hear the fire siren.
[Comment during onsite validation]
On page 5, add a NOTE that the applicant is Comment incorporated.
Simulator expected to notify the fire brigade by calling extension 1411.
lComment durina onsite validation1
~ ______
On page 1, make the step that locally opens valve Comment incorporated.
Simulator 2-FRV-256 a Critical Step.
[Comment during onsite validation]
On page 2, make the step that locally opens valve Simulator 2-FW-263 a Critical Step.
[Comment during onsite validation]
1 Simulator On page 2, step 4.10.2, In the suweillance procedure provided, the IST MIN and MAX times are already filled in. Make the applicant find the correct times t o put In the spaces, and make this a Critical Step to put in the correct times?
Comment incorporated.
3
DC COOK FEBRUARY 2006 INITIAL LICENSE EXAM OPERATING EXAM COMMENTS
- Source Comment Resolution
- 20. JPM G Add to the Task Briefing that the external fault Comment incorporated.
Simulator caused a reactor trip 20 minutes ago.
[Comment during onsite validation]
- 21. JPM G On pages 7 and 9, delete the Critical Steps Comment incorporated.
Simulator associated with adjusting RCP seal injection flow t o 6 12 gpm, and just say t o verify that RCP seal injection flow is 6 12 gpm (since no adjustment of RCP seal injection flow Is required).
lComment durina onslte validation1
Simulator Panel 221 Drop 67 &68 are NOT LIT.
[Comment during onsite validation]
- 23. JPM J On page 4, need t o add to the CUE at the bottom of Comment incorporated.
In-Plant the Daae that s t e w 3 through 7 are complete.
On page 6 , correct typo in NOTE: ... valve Comment incorporated.
e.
- 25. JPM K On page 4, add the following words at the Comment incorporated.
In-Plant beginning of the first CUE: (If Asked).
- 26. JPM K On page 6 , in the Evaluator Note at the top of the Comment incorporated.
In-Plant Dage, change Train A to Train B.
- 27. JPM K On page 6 , change the last CUE on the page to: Comment incorporated.
In-Plant (If asked) There was no loss of offsite power.
- 28. JPM K On page 7 , the second CUE from the bottom Comment incorporated.
In-Plant should say LIT instead of NOT LIT.
~
- 29. Scenario 06-01 Editorial: Comments incorporated.
- 1) In the first sentence In the Summar. delete Page 2 the extra will involve phrase.
- 2) In the first sentence In the 3rd paragraph, change will fail closed to failing closed.
- 3) In the first sentence in the4th paragraph, change failina t o fails.
A
DC COOK FEBRUARY 2006 INITIAL LICENSE EXAM OPERATING EXAM COMMENTS Source Comment Resolution Scenario 06-01 1) Change Tech Spec 3.3.4 from Does NOT Comments incorporated.
apply to Table B 3.3.4-1, Function 2, Condition A, Event 1 30 day clock.
Page 4 2) Add to TS 3.5.2 Condition A, 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> clock.
- 3) Add to TRM 8.1.1 Condition A, 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> c l o c k .
[Comments during onsite validation]
Scenario 06-01 1) Delete the NOTE about the SM directing the Comments incorporated.
crew to restore 75 gpm letdown, since the Unit Event 3 Supervisor should direct this action (or add a CUE for the booth as the SM).
Page 6
- 2) Editorial: In item 12), add an open parentheses before if desired).
Scenario 06-01 1) In the steps for the RO to restore letdown, place Comments incorporated.
the step to adjust charging flow t o 75 gpm after the Event 3 step that adjusts the letdown pressure controller t o 75%.
Page 6
- 2) After adjusting charging flow to 75 gpm, add steps that would allow the RO to place a second letdown orifice (45 gpm) in service.
[Comments during onsite validation]
Scenario 06-01 In the place where It states for the US to Directs Comment incorporated.
RNO actions for Step 5 of E - 0 , add at the end Page 0 what Step 5 does.
Scenario 06-01 The Critical Task #1 on this page says t o isolate Comment incorporated.
ALL MSIVs, whereas on page 11 it states that the Page 9 Critical Task is t o only close the #24 MSIV. Only closure of 824 MSIV should be a Critical Task.
Scenario 06-01 1) Editorial: Change Opens 2-lMO-221,2E CTS Comments incorporated.
Pump Discharge Valve t o Opens 2-lMO-221,2W Page 9 CTS Pump Discharge Valve.
- 2) Change valve 2-IMO-202 to 2-IMO-204.
[Comment during onsite validation]
~~
Scenario 06-01 On page 10, add a NOTE that verification of the six valves closed is not a Critlcal Step.
Page 10 lComment durina onsite validation1 5
DC COOK FEBRUARY 2006 INITIAL LICENSE EXAM 1;: 1 OPERATING EXAM COMMENTS
- Source Comment Resolution Scenario06-01 Add the first 9 steps of ES-1.1 to the end of the Comment incorporated.
scenario. [Comment during onsite validation]
Page 10 Scenario 06-01 Delete mention of MNV valves and SGBD Comment incorporated.
sample valves from the Performance Indicetors Page 11 for Critical Task #1.
Change the magnitude of the SGTR from 300 gpm Comment incorporated.
to 400 gpm. [Comment durlng onsite validation]
In the Event Description, change fails HIGH t o Comment incorporated.
fails L O W .
~ ~ ~
Edltorial: Change B e n d to Blend in middle of Comment incorporated.
page.
- 1) It states that the crew may enter the Excessive RCS Leakage procedure. The crew may also enter the SG Tube L e a k procedure. Add that the crew may also enter the SG Tube L e a k procedure.
- 2) In the sentence where it states for the US to direct ROlBOP to perform the immediate actions of E-0, add before this that the US directs RO/BOP to manually trip the reactor and Initiate safety injection (e.g., see wording In Scenario 06-03).
Scenario 06-02 1) Editorial: Put E-0 on the next line when the Zomments incorporated.
US announces a transition t o E-0.
Page 7
- 2) When the US directs operator actions to close the SO PORV, delete the Phrase and monitor Reactor Power.
- 4) Add to Critical Task #2 to close the Stop Valve Dump Valves. [Comment during onsite validation]
Scenario 06-02 Instead of terminating the scenario when the RCS :omment incorporated.
depressurization is started, continue the scenario Page 8 further until the depressurization has been stopped and SI has been terminated.
6
DC COOK FEBRUARY 2006 INITIAL LICENSE EXAM OPERATING EXAM COMMENTS Source Comment Resolution
~ ~ _______ _____
Scenario 06-02 Editorial: For Critical Task W , change SG 23 t o Comment incorporated.
Page 9 SG 22 in three places.
Scenario 06-02 For Critical Task #1, add (Train E) t o the Performance Indicator associated with manually Page 10 starting ECCS Equipment.
lComment during onsite validationl Scenario 06-02 For Critical Task 82, delete Ensures feed flow Comment incorporated.
isolated from the Performance Indicator.
Page 10 [Comment during onslte validation]
Scenario 06-02 For Critical Task #4, what is the acceptance Added as an acceptance criteria associated with not risking the criteria that the ruptured Page 10 consequences of SG overflll? SG inventory remains below 44 feet per ComDuter Point RCLSG2.
Scenario 06-02 Editorial: Under Simulator Instructions, Change Comment incorporated.
Page 13 #24 S G to #22 S G just below middle of page.
Scenario 06-03 1) On the Scenario Outline sheet, add to the 1) Comment incorporated.
Turnover that the SM wants the crew to raise Page 1 Reactor Power to 70%.
- 2) Move Event 3 (Raise Turbine and Reactor 2) Comment incorporated.
Power) to Event 1 before any malfunctions are inserted. [Comment durlng onsite validation]
- 3) Delete Event 8, since the failure of DG 2AB to 3) Event 8 was combined start does not significantly affect the scenario. with Event 7 as one malfunction.
_____ ~ ~ _____~~
Scenario 06-03 Editorial: In the last line of the 3rd paragraph, Comment incorporated.
Page 2 delete the words to the.
Scenario 06-03 Add a statement to reopen the CCW Surge Tank Comment incorporated.
Event 1 vent valve per the ARM if the valve closes.
Page 3 [Comment during onslte validationl Scenario 06-03 1) For Critical Task 91, opening BIT inlet valve 256 should not be a Critical Task, since the redundant Page 9 BIT inlet valve is already open.
- 2) The Critical Task should be to open BIT outlet valve 250 251, since these valves are in parallel.
- 3) For Critical Task #2, add the requirement that the RCPs are tripped within 5 minutes of the trip criteria beina satisfied (as Der Daae 12).
7
DC COOK FEBRUARY 2006 INITIAL LICENSE EXAM OPERATING EXAM COMMENTS
- Source Comment Resolution
to open the control air valves to containment.
Page 10 [Comment during onsite validation]
- 55. Scenario 06-04 Editorial: Comments incorporated.
- 1) In the last line of the 2w paragraph, delete the Page 2 period (.) After Technical Specifications.
- 2) On the last line of the last paragraph, change ECAO.l to ECA-0.1.
- 56. Scenario 06-04 1) Change the Event Description t o #4 Boric Acid Comments incorporated.
Pump Trip (and also change the Scenario Outline Event 3 sheet).
Page 5 2) Add t o the first line associated with the RO action to Verifies #4 Boric Acid Pump has tripped.
- 3) After TRO 8.1.1, add (No entry t o Condition A).
[Comment during onsite validation]
- 57. Scenario 06-04 Make a separate page for Event 4a and Event 4b. Comment incorporated.
Event 4d4b Page 6
- 58. Scenario 06-04 1) Critical Task #2 should be located right after Comments incorporated.
Critical Task #1on page 10 (after Bus T21A is Page 11 energized).
- 2) Editorial: Add space between actionsas directed.
- 3) For scenario termination, one would need to continue into ECA-0.2, If Bus T21A is not energized when entering ECA-0.2. Add the initial steps of ECA-0.2 at the end of the scenario, in case Bus T21A is not energized when entering ECA-0.2.
- 59. Scenario 06-04 Add t o the list of pumps to place in pull to lock the Comment incorporated.
ESW pumps (non-running).
Page 12 [Comment during onslte validation]
- 60. Scenario 06-04 Add to the Simulator Inlitructions that If Comment incorporated.
contacted as Unit 1 t o verify HSDP #4 BA Pump Page 18 position, report that the swltch is in the Control Room position.
- [Comment during onsite validation]
8
DC COOK FEBRUARY 2006 INITIAL LICENSE EXAM OPERATING EXAM COMMENTS
-# Source
~~
I Comment
~
Resolution
- 61. Scenario 06-05 1) In the 2"" paragraph on the Summary page, in Comments incorporated.
the first sentence, add the word "Range" after the Page 2 word "Power".
- 2) In the 2- paragraph on the Summary page, the second sentence needs to be changed, since one does not select an operable channel, and restore pressure control to automatic for a Power Range channel failure.
- 62. Scenario 06-05 Add Tech Spec Condition C to the list of condition Comment incorporated.
Event 1 entries for TS 3.3.1 for Power Range channel N142 Paae 4 failure. [Comment durina onsite validationl
- 63. Scenario 06-05 When placing excess letdown in service, delete Comment incorporated.
Event 3 mention of opening 2-QRV-161 letdown orifice Page 6 isolation valve.
[Comment durina onslte validationl
- _ _ _ _ ~ ~ _ _ _ ~
valves 2-CCW-160,164, and 165 to after placing Event 3 excess letdown in servlce to agree with the order in the procedure.
[Comment during onslte validationl
- Page 6
- 65. Scenario 06-05 For the failure low of the Main Steam Turbine Comment incorporated.
Event 4 Header pressure transmitter, add an option for the Page 7 BOP to control MFW flow by placing both MFW Pumps in Manual.
[Comment durlng onslte validationl
Page 9 fails to start.
- 67. Scenario 06-05 Make the step t o trip ail RCPs a part of Critical Comment incorporated.
Page 9 Task #2 (to agree with Its designation as part of Critical Task #2 on page 11).
[Comment durina onsite validationl
- ~ ~ ~~ ___
- 68. Scenario 06-05 For Critical Task #1, it states that there is a Comment incorporated.
Page 11 1. challenge t o multiple reactor trip setpoints including
' Low PZR pressure reactor trip and Low PZR pressure safety Injection. This should be changed to only list the SO lo lo level and SO FF/SF mismatch with lo level reactor trips for a 1 loss of FW event.
- 69. Scenario 06-06 Editorial: In the Event Description, change "SG 21" Comment incorporated.
Event 4 to "SO 22" and "FFC-210" to "FFC-220".
- Page 6 I 9
- Source Comment I Resolution
- 70. Scenario 06-06 For Critical Task X2, add the requirement that the Comment incorporated.
RCPs are tripped within 5 minutes of the trip Page 7 criteria being satisfied (as per page 9).
10