ML060880010
| ML060880010 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 02/06/2006 |
| From: | Valos N NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML060670557 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML060880010 (10) | |
Text
VARIOUS CHECKLISTS FOR THE D. C. COOK INITIAL EXAMINATION - FEBRUARY 2006
ES-201, Rev. 9E Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Target Date' Chief Initials Task Description (Reference)
Examiner's
(-901
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
[5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2))
Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b)
NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l.d; C.2.e)
Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)
Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)
??d J 7/a 2 774 d 31r A24
(-75) t 1-70)
- 6.
Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and 1; C.3.d)
(7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e))
ES-301-1, ES-301-2. ES-301-5. ES-D-l's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and Z
- J
(-45)
- 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5. ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e. f, g and h: C.3.d) 11
-30
- 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C.1.I; C.2.g; ES-202) ll
-14
- 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i:
I 4 di J ES-202)
~
~
~
- 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h: C.3.f) 11
-14 I 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)
I
- 1)
-7 I 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
- 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if 210) applications audited to confirm qualifications /eligibility: and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)
- 15. Proctoringlwritten exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)
II
-7
- 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)
' Target oates are generally based on facil.ly-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examinat on date Identitled n the corporate notitication letlor They are for planning purposes and may De adlusted on a case-by case basis n Coordination wdh the tacility licensee
[Applies only] (Does not apply] to exam nabons prepared by tne NRC
A uiiil ofArnerrcaii Electric Powei March 8, 2006 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Mr. Nicholas A. Valos Region I11 Licensing Examiner 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 Lisle. 1L 60532-4352 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 2006 INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION EXAMINATION SECURITY AGREEMENT The enclosed form ES-201-3 Examination Security Agreement is provided in accordance with NUREG-1021, Section 501. This Examination Security Agreement is associated with the Donald C Cook Nuclear Plant initial written licensing examinations administered on February 20, 2006.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (269) 466-3407.
Sincerely, 50-3 1512006-301 and 50-3 1612006-301 Robert K. Gillespie Operations Training Managet-JEN/jen Enclosures
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement FOIITI ES-201-3
- 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 3--lj-(.L as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g.. acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination secunty may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knofi&&!,$$
not divulge to any unauthorized persons any informatin concerning the NRC licensing examinatiins administered during the week(s) of & a d d
. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completin of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
I PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SlGNATURE(2)
DATE NOTE
- 1. -
S + W ' L LJ hi&
2 7 &-. &bfh*.fT
- 2. / /. A n cy,,,
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or &%@%omlance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2)
DATE NOTE
n I
ES-201 Examination Security Agreemenl Form ESZOl.3 h 2 - C 3 - F i?-&-OO6 4rch
~ - 2 ~ 4 6
- 1.
PreExaminaUm Jacknodedge that I have acquired specialized kncwkdge aboul Ihe NRC lcensing eraminations scheduled for of my signature I agree hat I wil nol knowingly diMllge any infwmation abut Ihese exarnina6an.s to any persons whohave not been aulhonred by he NRC chief examiner. I undersbnd that I am nol lo imtrUtA, euabate. or pmvide perlormanu, leedback to those applicmtr scheduled to be administered these licensing emmiletions from lhis date unOl compl&WI 01 exammation adminisbalion, ~xcept as spedfidty noted below and auvMO2ed bY the NRC 1 (e.9.. acting as a simu'alor boolh operator or ccirmnunicalor is acceptable if Ihc mdvichal does not select the lraining content of pfovldc direci of indim!
1 feedbad). Furplennare, 1 am aware of Vla physkal security measures and requirementi [as documented in the facility liensee's p d u n s ) and understand lhal violalion of the COnditions of this agrement may resuult in canoshtim of t k examinati a n d a an enlmemenl action against me 01 Ihe hciliiy lansce. I MI immediately repor( lo facility management or the NRC chid examiner any indications or suggestions lhal examination secuity may have been compromised.
m k ( s ) d 3.
'3-Og Of the&
- 3.
Poat-Ex-To (he bsst of my kno-Ifllidivulge to any unau(harized petsons anyinlomaliin concerning (he NRC llcensing BXaminatioN admiristered during ha mk(s) of' insln.cl. evaluate. M probide parlonnana feedback lo h s e apptmnls who w e adminiskred mese I c d n g examinations. except as specilicalty noted belovr and aulhmred by Ihe NRC.
mrn the date tM I entered into this security agreemen1 unlii the compla(l0n of examiflalion adrnhislration. I did no1 PRINTED NAME a &&uL JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SlGNATURE(1)
OATE SlGNATURE (2)
OATE NOTE UJR RSSn.74b&+&
/~mk, Sr.7r.w
ES-401 Record of Reiected WAS Form ES-401-4 Tier 112 -
112 -
212 -
212 -
21 1 -
1 /1*
1 / I*
1 /2*
I /2*
2 1 I * -
111
~ -
Randomlv I
Reason For Reiection Selected WA 000001 2.3.4 001 - # Continuous Rod Withdrawal & Radiation Limits. Unable to develop a question with plausible distracters of sufficient difficulty (>2).
Replaced with WA 000001 2.1.20.
000076 AA2.04 023 - High Reactor Coolant Activity & Effluent Chart Recorder. Chart Recorder is not used with Reactor Coolant Activity Monitor. Change to corrective actions required. Replaced with WA 000076 AA2.02.
044 - #Containment Cooling System & RO duties with Fuel Handling.
Unable to develop a question with plausible distracters of sufficient difficulty (>2). Replaced with KIA 022000 2. I.32.
049 - #Containment Purge System & RO tasks outside of Control Room during emergency. Unable to develop a question with plausible distracters of sufficient difficulty (>2). Replaced with 029000 2.4.3 1.
062 - # Service Water & Ability to determine Mode of Operation.
Unable to develop a question with plausible distracters of sufficient difficulty (>2). Replaced with WA 076000 2.1.33.
076 - # Small Break LOCA & Making changes as per SAR. Unable to develop ti question with plausible distracters of sufficient difficulty (>2).
Replaced with KIA 000009 2.2.25.
077 - # Large LOCA & 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> Tech Spec action statements. Unable to develop a question with plausible distracters of sufficient difficulty (>2).
Also Random KA Program overweighted Tier 1. Replaced with WA 026000 A2.08 which is in Tier 2 Group I to restore balance to outline.
079 - # Loss of IR NI & ALARA. Unable to develop a question with plausible distracters of sufficient difficulty (>2). Replaced with WA 000033 2.4.46.
OOWE16 EA2.2 089 Random KA Program overweighted Tier 1. Replaced with WA 01 6000 2.2. I8 which is in Tier 2 Group 2 to restore balance to outline.
025000 2.4.36 090 - # Ice Condenser & ChemIHP actions in emergency. Unable to develop a question with plausible distracters of sufficient difficulty (>2).
Replaced with WA 025000 2.4.35.
035 - Unable to develop suitable question at the RO Level for this KA.
KA requires assessment of conditions and procedure selection which are SRO requirements. The limited use of this procedure (LOCA outside Containment) made it impossible to to develop suitable question at the RO Level. Replaced with WA OOWE04 EA2.2 022000 2.2.30 029000 2.4.34 076000 2.1.22 000009 2.2.5 00001 1 2.1.1 1 00033 2.3.2 00WE04 EA2.1 1 * = SRO Only
- =Justification not required per ES-401 Attachment 2
ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist item Description
- 1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading Initials a
b C
CF;
&+A 3d
.Lc-
- 2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented bu-
?Id
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
' ' & ~
- s A,
1/8/06
- d. NRC Supervisor (')
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
Grading for all borderline cases (80 +2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training of questions missed by half or more of the applicants deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity
(')
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
JL W
w
- 32.
- nr/
dx 3d s- %M hL/
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Printed Narne/Signature Date
- a. Grader
- b. Facility Reviewerr)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
(Second examination grading quality checklist (ES-403-1 ) is for the re-grade after a change to the post examination comments resulting in accepting a second correct answer on a question vice deleting the question from the examination.)
ES-403, Page 5 of 5