ML060880010
| ML060880010 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 02/06/2006 |
| From: | Valos N NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML060670557 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML060880010 (10) | |
Text
VARIOUS CHECKLISTS FOR THE D. C. COOK INITIAL EXAMINATION - FEBRUARY 2006
ES-201, Rev. 9E Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Target Chief Date' Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials
- 1. Examination administrationdate confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) ??dJ
- 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l .d; C.2.e) 7/a 2
- 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) 774d
- 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) 31r t
(-901 [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)) A24
(-75) 6. Integratedexamination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1,ES-301-2. ES-301-5.ES-D-l's, ES-401-1/2,ES-401-3,and Z*J ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and 1; C.3.d) 1-70) (7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e))
(-45) 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4,ES-301-5.ES-301-6,and ES-401-6),and reference materials due (C.1.e. f, g and h: C.3.d) 1 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C.1 .I; C.2.g; ES-202) l
-30
-14
- 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i:
~
~ ~
I 4 di J
- 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h: C.3.f) 1 I 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) I 1)
-14
-7 I 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
- 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if 210) applications audited to confirm qualifications /eligibility: and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)
- 15. Proctoringlwrittenexam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)
I -7
- 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributedto NRC examiners (C.3.i)
' Target oates are generally based on facil.ly-preparedexaminations and are keyed to the examinat on date Identitled n the corporate notitication letlor They are for planning purposes and may De adlusted on a case-by case basis n Coordination wdh the tacility licensee
[Applies only] (Does not apply] to exam nabons preparedby tne NRC
INDIANA MICHIGAN MER' A uiiil ofArnerrcaii Electric Powei March 8, 2006 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Mr. Nicholas A. Valos Region I11 Licensing Examiner 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 Lisle. 1L 60532-4352 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 50-3 1512006-301 and 50-3 1612006-301 2006 INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION EXAMINATION SECURITY AGREEMENT The enclosed form ES-201-3 Examination Security Agreement is provided in accordance with NUREG-1021, Section 501. This Examination Security Agreement is associated with the Donald C Cook Nuclear Plant initial written licensing examinations administered on February 20, 2006.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (269) 466-3407.
Sincerely, Robert K. Gillespie Operations Training Managet-JEN/jen Enclosures
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement FOIITI ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 3--lj-(.Las of the date of my signature. I agree that Iwill not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and I authorized by the NRC (e.g.. acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. Iwill immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination secunty may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knofi&&!,$$ not divulge to any unauthorized persons any informatin concerning the NRC licensing examinatiins administered during the week(s) of & a d d . From the date that Ientered into this security agreement until the completin of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SlGNATURE(2) DATE NOTE
- 1. S + W ' L LJ hi& 2 7 &-. &bfh*.fT
- 2. / / . A n c y ,,, From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or &%@%omalnce feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE
I ES-201 Examination Security Agreemenl Form ESZOl.3 n
- 1. PreExaminaUm h 2 - C 3-F i?-&-OO6 4rch ~ - 2 ~ 4 6 Jacknodedge that I have acquired specialized kncwkdge aboul Ihe NRC lcensingeraminations scheduled for m k ( s ) d 3. '3-Og Of the&
of my signature I agree hat Iwil nol knowingly diMllge any infwmation a b u t Ihese exarnina6an.sto any persons whohave not been aulhonred by he NRC chief examiner. I undersbnd that I am nol l o imtrUtA, euabate. or pmvide perlormanu, leedback to those applicmtr scheduled to be administered these licensing emmiletions from lhis date unOl compl&WI 01 exammation adminisbalion, ~ x c e p as t spedfidty notedbelow and auvMO2edbY the NRC 1 (e.9.. acting as a simu'alor boolh operator or ccirmnunicaloris acceptable ifIhc mdvichaldoes not select the lraining content of pfovldc direci of indim!
1 feedbad). Furplennare, 1 am aware of Vla physkal security measures and requirementi [as documented in the facility liensee's p d u n s ) and understandlhal violalionof the COnditions of this agrement may resuult in canoshtim of t k e x a m i n a t i a n d a an enlmemenl action against me 01 Ihe hciliiy lansce. I MI immediatelyrepor( lo facility management or the NRC chid examiner any indications or suggestions lhal examination secuity may have been compromised.
- 3. Poat-Ex-To (he bsst ofmy kno- I f l l i d i v u l g e to any unau(harized petsons anyinlomaliin concerning (he NRC llcensing BXaminatioN admiristered during ha m k ( s )' fo mrn the date tM Ientered into this security agreemen1unlii the compla(l0n of examiflalionadrnhislration. Idid no1 insln.cl. evaluate. M probide parlonnana feedback lo h s e apptmnls who w e adminiskred mese I c d n g examinations. except as specilicalty noted belovr and aulhmred by Ihe NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SlGNATURE(1) OATE SlGNATURE (2) OATE NOTE RSSn 7 Sr.7r.w
.4b&+& /~mk, UJR a &&uL
ES-401 Record of Reiected WAS Form ES-401-4 Tier Randomlv I Reason For Reiection Selected WA 112 000001 2.3.4 001 - # Continuous Rod Withdrawal & Radiation Limits. Unable to develop a question with plausible distracters of sufficient difficulty (>2).
- Replaced with WA 000001 2.1.20.
112 000076 AA2.04 023 - High Reactor Coolant Activity & Effluent Chart Recorder. Chart Recorder is not used with Reactor Coolant Activity Monitor. Change to
- corrective actions required. Replaced with WA 000076 AA2.02.
212 022000 2.2.30 044 - #Containment Cooling System & RO duties with Fuel Handling.
Unable to develop a question with plausible distracters of sufficient
- difficulty (>2). Replaced with KIA 022000 2. I .32.
212 029000 2.4.34 049 - #Containment Purge System & RO tasks outside of Control Room during emergency. Unable to develop a question with plausible
- distracters of sufficient difficulty (>2). Replaced with 029000 2.4.3 1 .
21 1 076000 2.1.22 062 - # Service Water & Ability to determine Mode of Operation.
Unable to develop a question with plausible distracters of sufficient
- difficulty (>2). Replaced with WA 076000 2.1.33.
1 /1* 000009 2.2.5 076 - # Small Break LOCA & Making changes as per SAR. Unable to develop ti question with plausible distracters of sufficient difficulty (>2).
- Replaced with KIA 000009 2.2.25.
1 / I* 00001 1 2.1.1 1 077 - # Large LOCA & 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> Tech Spec action statements. Unable to develop a question with plausible distracters of sufficient difficulty (>2).
Also Random KA Program overweighted Tier 1 . Replaced with WA
__ 026000 A2.08 which is in Tier 2 Group I to restore balance to outline.
1 /2* 00033 2.3.2 079 - # Loss of IR NI & ALARA. Unable to develop a question with plausible distracters of sufficient difficulty (>2). Replaced with WA
- 000033 2.4.46.
I / 2
- OOWE16 EA2.2 089 Random KA Program overweighted Tier 1. Replaced with WA
- 016000 2.2. I8 which is in Tier 2 Group 2 to restore balance to outline.
21 I* 025000 2.4.36 090 - # Ice Condenser & ChemIHP actions in emergency. Unable to develop a question with plausible distracters of sufficient difficulty (>2).
- Replaced with WA 025000 2.4.35.
111 00WE04 EA2.1 035 - Unable to develop suitable question at the RO Level for this KA.
KA requires assessment of conditions and procedure selection which are SRO requirements. The limited use of this procedure (LOCA outside Containment) made it impossible to to develop suitable question at the
- RO Level. Replaced with WA OOWE04 EA2.2
~
- 1 * = SRO Only # =Justification not required per ES-401 Attachment 2
ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Initials item Description a b C
- 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading CF; &+A 3d
- 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified
.Lc- bu- ?Id and documented
- 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors JL W w (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
- 32.
- nr/
- 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified dx 3d
- 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity s- %M hL/
of questions missed by half or more of the applicants
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) &~*s A, 1/8/06
- d. NRC Supervisor (')
(') The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Printed Narne/Signature Date
- a. Grader
- b. Facility Reviewerr)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
(Second examination grading quality checklist (ES-403-1 ) is for the re-grade after a change to the post examination comments resulting in accepting a second correct answer on a question vice deleting the question from the examination.)
ES-403, Page 5 of 5