ML060880011

Proposed Examination Submittal Letter and Checklists for the D.C. Cook Initial Examination - February 2006

ML060880011
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	02/06/2006
From:	Bailey R Indiana Michigan Power Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML060670557	List: ML060880006 ML060880007 ML060880008 ML060880009 ML060880010 ML060880011 ML060880012 ML060880013
References
Download: ML060880011 (11)

Text

PROPOSED EXAMINATION SUBMITTAL LETTER AND CHECKLISTS FOR THE DC COOK INITIAL EXAMINATION FEBRUARY 2006

Indiana Michigan Power Company Niicle-ir G e n ~ r a t i wGrriiip One Conk P l a c e Biidgiiisil MI 4 Y l O t i ac,> C i i l l l December 14, 2005 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Mr. Nicholas A. Valos Region 111 Examiner 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 Lisle. 1L 60532-4352 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 2006 INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION Enclosed you will tind a copy of the Initial License Examination for the planned Frhruai-y 2006 Exaiiiination at Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant (CNP).

The following items are enclosed in the sealed envelope:

CNP 2006 NRC Operating Exaniination Overview ES-201-3 Exaniination Security Agreement ES-301-3 Operating Test Quality Checklist Scenario Exams with Forms ES-D- 1 & D-2 a) COOKO6-01 h) COOK06-02 c) COOK06-03 d) COOK06-04 e) COOK06-05 t) COOK06-06 ES-301-4 Simulator Checklist Set 1 ES-301-4 Simulator Checklist Set 2 ES-301-4 Simulator Checklist Set 3 ES-301-5 Transient and Event Checklist Set 1 ES-301-5 Transient and Event Checklist Set 2 ES-301-5 Transient and Event Checklist Set 3 ES-301-6 Competencies Checklist Set 1 ES-301-6 Competencies Checklist Set 2 ES-301-6 Competencies Checklist Set 3 ES-301-2 System JPM Outlines & Exams a) SRO(1) JPM Outline h) SRO(U) JPM Outline c) NRC2006-SIM01 d) NRC2006-SIM02

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Coinnission Deceiiiber xx, 2005 Page 2 e) NRC2006-SIM03 t) NRC2006-SIM04 g) NRC2006-SIM05 h) NRC2006-SIM06 i) NRC2006-SIM07 j) NRC2006-INPO1 k) NRC2006-INP02

1) NRC2006-INP03

15) ES-301-1 Admin JPM Outlines &Exams a) SRO(1) Admiii Outline b) SRO(U) Admin Outline c) NRC2006-SRO-a d) NRC2006-SRO-b e ) NRC2006-SRO-c t) NRC2006-SRO-d g) NRC2006-SRO-e

16) ES-401-6 Written Exam Quality Checklist - SRO

17) CNP 2006 Written Exam SRO Attachments

18) CNP 2006 NRC Written Examination (100 questions with references)

19) AUDIT Exam Operating Test Outline A hard copy of all the examination materials is provided for your review. An electronic copy oi documents without initials or signatures or other handwritten notations for the Public Document Room (ADAMS) has also been provided.

None of these niaterials are to go to the Public Document Room (ADAMS) until atier the examination has k e n completed.

An electronic copy of supporting reference material for the operating test and a hard copy of updated exam schedules based u p n discussions with the NRC are also enclosed.

If you have any comments or concerns, please contact Ron Bailey or Steve Pettinger at (269) 466-3364.

Siiicerely, QR.O&

Daniel R. Walter Facility Representative RMB/jen Enclosures

ES-3C1 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form EG-301-3 Date of Examination: sst Number:

1. General Criteria

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline: changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g.. 10 CFR 55.45, operational Importance, safety function distribution).

b. There is no day-tpday repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

C. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' aude test(s). (see Section D.1.a.)

d. Overlap wim the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.

e. It appears that Ihe operating test will differentiate behveencompelent and less-thancompetent

2. Walk-Through Criteria

a. JPM includes the following. as applicable:

.-Eachinitiating initial conditions cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific I - designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important obserdations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated petforrnance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of StEpS. B applicable

b. Ensure mat any changes from the previously approved sytems and administrativewalk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1and 2) have not caused lhe test to deviale horn any of the acceptance criteria (e.9.. item distribution, bank use. repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specifled on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name ISisnatue Date

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewerr)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

hOTE

• The lac lily s gnatdre IS no1 app .can e lor luRCdeveloped tests P lndependenl NRC reviewer in t a1 items in Colmn 'c' chlef examiner concuiience reqd red ES-301. Page 24 of 27

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form tS-301-4 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials I I

1. The initial conditions are realistic. in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptomstcues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shiR position) the event termination point (if applicable)

6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. /y@ R J

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are "illan

8. The simulator modeling is not altered. (2,pJaL-J

9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d). any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the reference piant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. &$ *&

10 Every operator will be evalLaIed LS ng at leas1 one new or sognficanuy moaifieo scenario A I otner Scenarios have been altered In accordance with Section D 5 of ES.301

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated. as verified using Forrr ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12 Each apphcant w II be s gn ficanl y invo ved n the minimdm number 01 transienls and evenls specified on Form ES-301-5 (sJDm4 the form with the somdlalor scenanosJ 1 diel.. a J

7. Critical tasks (2-3)

NUREG-1021, Revision 9

kS-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist korm tS-301-4 Facility DC Cook Nuclear Station Date of Exam: 02/06/2006 Scenario Numbers: 2 t 4 /I Operating Test No.:Set 2 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES

~~ ~

I Initials

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andtor instrumentation may be out of service. but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. w

3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptomstcues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. ra'v ,.?iJ

6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

,%'v nr/

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators 7.

have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are 4 *r/

kS-301 S i m u l a t o r Scenario Quality C h e c k l i s t Form tS-301-4 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b &

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor instrumentation may be out of sewice, but it does not cue the operaton into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptomstcues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) 4 ho more than one on-mecnan st c fa I.re (e g , pipe oreak, 1s incorporate0 n10 Ihe Scenarm *d w ihout a cred ole preceamg inc oenl sum as a se smic even!

5 Tne events are va d w l n regaro IOpnyscs ana lhermooynam cs a/

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain hr, complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

I I I If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates, Operators have sufficient time to carw out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 acility: DC Cook Date of Examination: 02/06/2006 Operating Test No.: SI APPLICANTS Competencies RO 0 RO 0 RO 0 SRO-l 0 SRO-I SRO-I SRO-U SRO-U 0 SRO-U SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO I ___ __

52 3 3 A S B S T R 0 R c o P

_- - 0

,3. 1 2 I .4. 1.2.

iterpretlDiagnose 5.7 4.5. 6.8 4.5.

lvents and Conditions 6 6.7,

__ __ 8

,3. 1.2, 1.4. 1.2.

omply With and 5.7 3.4. 5 3.4.

Ise Procedures (1) 5.6 5.6.

_ _ __ r.e

.3. 1.4.

)perate Control 5.7 7 loards (2) __ _- _

.3. 1.2. 1.4. 1.2.

ommunicate 5,7 3.4. 5.6, 3.4.

nd Interact 5,6 7 56

_- _- 7.8 1.2. 1.2.

)emonstrate 3,4, 3.4.

iupervisory Ability (3) 5.6 5 1.2 1.2.

omply With and Jse Tech. Specs. (3) -- - 4 lotes:

I) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO

2) Optional for an SRO-U.

3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's ljcense type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6

acility: DC Cook Date of Examination: 02/06/2006 Operating Test No.: Set 2 APPLICANTS Competencies RO SRO-I SRO-l SRO-I SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U 0

~

SCENARIO SCENARIO I ZENARIO I SCENARIO 2 4 2 4 1 _4 _ 1 S B A S B A S R O T R O T R O P C O P c o nterpreVDiagnose 2. 2.4. l,2. 1.2. 2.4, 1.3. 1.2, 1.5. 6 4.5 3,4, 5.6 5.6. 3,4.

!vents and Conditions _ 6 _ 6,7 _7 _ 5

.2. 2.4. 8.2. 1.2. 2 9 1.3. 1.4.

omply With and 1,4, 6 1,4, 4,5, 5.6 5.6 5 Jse Procedures (1) __

5.6 5 6 __

2.4. I .2. 2,4. 1.3.

)perate Control 6 1'4. 5.6 5.6.

3oards (2) -_ 5 _-

7 1.2. 2.4. 1.2, 1.2, 2.4. 1,3. 1.2.

ommunicate 1.4. 6 j,4, 3.4. 5.6 5.6. 3,4.

ind Interact 5.6 5 5,6, 7 5.6

-_ 7 __

1.2.

1.2. 3.4. 1.2.

lemonstrate 1,4, 5.6, 3,4.

upervisory Ability (3) _-

5.6 7 _-5.6 1.2 12 1,4

omply With and Jse Tech. Specs. (3) - -

Jotes:

1) includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

2) Optional for an SRO-U.

3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 1 SCENARI

~

1 A S T R O T R 11I C O P c o I

2.7. 1.2. 2.4. 1.3, 1.2.

InterpreWDiagnose a 3.4. 5.6 5,6, 3.4.

Events and Conditions 6,7 7 5 Comply With and Use Procedures (1) 1 1 2.3.

5,7 1.2, 2.4.

5.6 1,3.

5.6 1.4, 5

I I I 1.3, Operate Control 5,s.

_- 7 1,3. 1.2.

Communicate 5.6. 3.4.

and Interact 7 5,6 1.2.

Demonstrate 3.4.

_- 5.6 1.2 1.4 Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) -

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

2) Optional for an SRO-U.

3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: Date of Exam: Exam Level: R O O S R O m Item Description

1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.

2. a. NRC WAS are referencedfor all questions.

b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.

3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401

4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, WnSult the NRR OL program omce).

5. Question duplication from the license screeninglaudn exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

- the audit exam was srjternatically and randomly developed: or

- the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started: or e examinations were developed independently: or i 9

- the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or

- other (explain)

~~

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modfied New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modmed): enter the actual RO i SRO-anly question distribution(s) at right.

9 1,3 10 1 6 1 6 I6 I

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are Written at the comprehension1analysis level:

the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected WAS support the higher cognitive levels: enter 53 I 9 42 I 16 the a m a i RO i SRO question distribution(s) at right.

8. Referencesmandoutsprovided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distracton.

9. Question content conforms with speciflc WA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned:

deviations are justified.

IO. Question psychometric qualny and format meet the auldelines in ES Appendix B.

11. The exam contains the required number of one-pdnt, multiple choice items:

the total is coned and agrees with the value on the wver Sheet.

Printed Name ISign

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer r)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note:

• The facility reviewers initialslsignature are not applicable for NRC-developedexaminations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column IC:chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-401, Page 29 of 33