ML052440218
| ML052440218 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire  |
| Issue date: | 08/22/2005 |
| From: | Gordon Peterson Duke Power Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 05-MN-01 | |
| Download: ML052440218 (67) | |
Text
_ Duke rPowere A Duke Energy Company GARY R. PETERSON Vice President McGuire Nuclear Station Duke Power MGOIVP / 12700 Hagers Ferry Road Huntersville, NC 28078-9340 704 875 5333 704 875 4809 fax grpeters@duke-energy.com August 22, 2005 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
20555-0001
Subject:
Duke Energy Corporation McGuire Nuclear Station Unit 1 Docket No. 50-369 Relief Request (RR) 05-MN-01 Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3), Duke requests approval to use alternatives to Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.
Compliance with the specified requirements of this section would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety.
However, the proposed alternatives will provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.
Specific details are described in the attached relief requests.
Questions on this matter should be directed to Norman T.
Simms, McGuire Regulatory Compliance, at (704) 875-4685.
Sincerely, G.R. Peterson Attachment
,.Xf www.duke -energy. corn
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission August 22, 2005 Page 2 cc w/attachment:
Mr. W.D. Travers Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Mr. S.E. Peters, Project Manager (addressee only)
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North, Mail Stop 08 G9 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Mr. J.B. Brady Senior NRC Resident Inspector McGuire Nuclear Station
ATTACHMENT Relief Request 05-MN-OO1
Request Relief 05-MN-001 Page 1 of 10 Proposed Relief in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii),
Inservice Inspection Impracticality Duke Energy Corporation McGuire Nuclear Station - Unit I (EOC-16)
Third 10-Year Interval - Inservice Inspection Plan Interval Start Date= December 1, 2001 Interval End Date= December 1, 2011 ASME Section XI Code - 1995 Edition with 1996 Addenda and *Westinghouse Owner's Group (WCAP-14572)
Code Case N-460 is applicable Examination Dates October 11, 2002-April 12, 2004 l.
II.
Ill.
IV. & V.
VI.
VIL.
VI[.L List Limited System /
Code Requirement from Which Relief Is Impracticality/
Proposed Implementation Justification for Number Area/Weld I.D.
Component for Which Reliet is Requested:
Burden Caused Alternate Schedule and Granting Reliet Number Requested:
100% Exam Volume Coverage by Compliance Examinations or Duration Area or Weld to be Examined Exam Category Testing Item No.
Fig. No.
Limitation Percentage I PZR 12 NC System Exam Category B.D See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph Pressurizer Spray Nozzle to Upper Item No. B03.110.002 "A"
"0"."N".
"H" Head Fig. IWB-2500-7 (b)
See Attachment I See Attachment I 73.6% Volume Coverage (COVERAGE Pages 1.23 Pages 1.23 LIMITATION)
- 2.
IPZR-15 NC System Exam Category B-D See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph Pressurizer SafetyNozzle to Upper Item No. B303.110.005 "A"
"G"."N".
"H" Head Fig. IWB-2500-7(b)
See Attachment I See Attachmen I 73.6% Volume Coverage (COVERAGE Pages 1 23 Pages 1.23 LIM ITATION)
- 3.
I PZR-16 NC System Exam Category B-D See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph Pressurizer Relief Nozzle to Upper Item No. B03.110.006 "A"
0"."N".
"H" Head Fig. IWB-2500-7(b)
See Attachment I See Attachment I 73.6% Volume Coverage (COVERAGE Pages 1.23 Pages 1.23 LIMITATION)
- 4.
I RCPA-8 1 NV System Exam Category C.A See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph 1" Reciprocating Charging Pump Item No. COI.010.090
."11 "G".
N".
See Attachment 2 Accumulator Flange to Shell Fig. IWC-2500- 1 See Attachment 2 Pages 1I 74.4% Volume Coverage (COVERAGE Pages 1.6 LIMITATION)
- 5.
IASWINJF-I NV System Exam Category C.A See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph J' Seal Water injection Filter IA Shell to Item No. COI.0l0.l00 "C"
"G"."N".
See Attachme. t Upper FMange Fig. IWVC-2500-1 See Attachment 3 Pages 1-5 64.4% Volume Coverage (COVERAGE Pages 1.5 LIMITATION)
Request Relief OSMN-001 Page 2 of 10 1
I11.
IV. & V.
VI.
VIl.
Vll.
List Limited System
/
Code Requirement from Which Reiler Is Impracticality Proposed Implementation Justification for Number AreafWcld I.D.
Component for Which Relief Is Requested: 100% Exam Volume Burden Caused Alternate Schedule and Granting Relief Number Requested:
Coverage by Cornpiiance Examinations Duration Area or Weld to be Examined Exam Category or Testing Item No.
Fig. No.
Limitation Percentage
- 6.
I ELDHX-HD-NV System Exam Category C-A See Paragraph 'D" See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph -K-FLG Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger item No. C01.020.021 See Attachment 4
- G.C.
"N".
See Attachment 4 Head to Flange Fig. IWC-2500-1 Pages 1-i l Pages I -I 1 79.8% Volume Coverage (COVERAGE LIM ITATION)
- 7.
I RCPA-10-1 NV System Exam Category C-A See Paragraph "E" See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph "U' Reciprocating Charging Pump Item No. C01.020.080 See Attachment 5
- G-.
"N".
See Attachment 5 Accumulator Shell to Head Fig. IWC-2500-1 Pages 1-6 Pages 1-6 71.1% Volume Coverage ( COVERAGE LIM ITATION)
- 8.
INVP888-1 NV System Exam Category R-A (Table 4. 1-I)
See Paragraph *F' See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph Reducer to Pipe Item No. R01.0 I1.150 See Attachment 6 "G".
"N".
Fig. IWB-2500-8 (c) & Note I Pages 1-5 See Attachment 6 35.6% Volume Coverage (COVERAGE Pages 1-3 LIMITATION)
- Piping Welds examined under the RI-ISI Program developed in accordance with methodology contained in the Westinghouse Owner's Group (WOG) Topical Report, WCAP-14572, Revision 1-NPA and Request for Relief 01-005 approved by SER, dated June 12, 2002.
Request Relief 0S-NI N-00 1 Page 3 of 10 IV. & V.
lmpracticality/Burden caused by Code Compliance Paragraph A: (The Pressurizer Spray, Safety and Relief Nozzles are carbon steel. The diameter of the Spray Nozzle is 12.750 inches with a wall thickness of 1.900 inches. The diameter of the Safety and Relief Nozzles is 15.00 inches with a wall thickness of 1.900 inches.)
During the ultrasonic examination of these welds, 100% coverage of the required examination volume could not be obtained. Coverage was limited because of the proximity of the nozzle blend radius to the weld, which prevented axial scanning from the nozzle side. The amount of coverage reported presents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and base material. The weld volume was scanned using 45-degree and 60-degree shear waves and straight beam longitudinal waves. The 45-degree beam covered 88% of the weld and 62% of the base material; the 60-degree beam covered 78% of the weld and 54% of the base material and the straight beam covered 100% of the weld and 58% of the base material. In order to achieve more coverage, the welds would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of these welds.
Paragraph B: (The Reciprocating Charging Pump Accumulator Flange to Shell weld is stainless steel. The diameter of this weld is 6.660 with a wall thickness of.495 inches.)
During the ultrasonic examination of the shell to flange weld, 100% coverage of the required examination volume could not be obtained. Coverage was limited because of the proximity of the flange taper to the weld, which prevented scanning from four directions. The amount of coverage reported presents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and base material. The weld volume was scanned using 45-degree shear waves supplemented by 60-degree longitudinal waves. The 45-degree beam covered 72% of the required examination volume in four orthogonal directions. The 60-degree beam covered 8% from one axial direction.
In order to achieve more coverage, the weld would have to be redesigned to eliminate the flange taper, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.
Paragraph C: (The Seal Water Injection Filter 1A Shell to Upper Flange is stainless steel. The diameter of this weld is 4.000 inches with a wall thickness of.438 inches.
During the ultrasonic examination of the shell to flange weld, 100% coverage of the required examination volume could not be obtained. Coverage was limited because of the proximity of the flange taper to the weld, which prevented scanning from four directions. The amount of coverage reported presents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and base material. The weld volume was scanned using 45-degree shear waves supplemented by 60-degree longitudinal waves. The 45-degree beam covered 63% of the required examination volume in four orthogonal directions. The 60-degree beam covered 3% from one axial direction.
Request Relier 05-NMN-O01 Plagc 4 or lv)
In order to achieve more coverage, the weld would have to be redesigned to eliminate the flange taper, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.
Paragraph D: (The Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger Head to Flange is stainless steel-carbon steel. The diameter of this weld is 9.500 inches with a wall thickness of.750 inches.
During the ultrasonic examination of the head to flange weld, 100% coverage could not be obtained. Coverage was limited because of the proximity of the flange taper to the weld, which prevented scanning from four directions. The amount of coverage reported presents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and base material. The weld volume was scanned using 45-degree shear waves supplemented by 45-degree longitudinal waves. The 45-degree shear wave covered 51 % of the required examination volume in four orthogonal directions. The 45-degree longitudinal wave covered 28% from one axial direction. In order to achieve more coverage, the weld would have to be redesigned to eliminate the flange taper, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.
Paragraph E: (The Reciprocating Charging Pump Accumulator Shell to Head Weld is stainless steel. The diameter of this weld is 6.660 inches with a wall thickness of.495 inches.
During the ultrasonic examination of the shell to head weld, 100% coverage of the required examination volume could not be obtained. Coverage was limited because of the proximity of the flange taper to the weld, which prevented scanning from four directions. The amount of coverage reported presents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and base material. The weld volume was scanned using 45-degree shear waves supplemented by 60-degree longitudinal waves. The 45-degree shear wave covered 67% of the required examination volume in four orthogonal directions. The 60-degree longitudinal wave covered 12% from one axial direction. In order to achieve more coverage, the weld would have to be redesigned to eliminate the head taper, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.
Paragraph F: (The reducer to pipe material is stainless steel. The diameter of this weld is 2.000 inches with a wall thickness of.344 inches.)
During the ultrasonic examination of this weld, 100% coverage of the required examination volume could not be obtained. Coverage was limited because of the proximity of the reducer and it's taper to a socket weld at an adjacent valve, which prevented scanning from four directions.
The amount of coverage reported presents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and base material. The required volume was scanned using 45-degree, 60-degree shear waves and 70-degree shear waves. The 45-degree beam covered 50% of the volume in two circumferential directions. The 60-degree beam covered 42% of the volume in one axial
Request Relief 0O-NIN-001 Page 5 of II direction from the reducer side of the weld. The 70-degree shear wave covered 17.4% of the volume from one axial direction from the reducer side of the weld but was not included in the percent of coverage because of the requirements in 10CFR50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(2). In order to achieve more coverage, the weld would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.
VI.
Proposed Alternate Examinations or Testing Paragraph G:
The scheduled 10-year code examination was performed on the referenced area/welds and it resulted in the noted limited coverage of the required ultrasonic volume. No additional examinations are planned for the area/weld during the current inspection interval.
VII.
Implementation Schedule and Duration Paragraph N:
The scheduled 10-year code examination was performed on the referenced area/welds and it resulted in the noted limited coverage of the required ultrasonic volume. No additional examinations are planned for the area/weld during the current inspection interval.
VIII.
Justification for Granting Relief Paragraph H:
Ultrasonic examination of these welds for item B03.110 was conducted using personnel, qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VII. The examinations were also performed in accordance with the requirements of ASME Section V, Article 4 with the additional requirements of ASME Section XI, Appendix 1.
The Pressurizer Nozzle to Upper Head Welds are limited due to single sided access caused by their nozzle geometry. In order to achieve more coverage, the nozzles would have to be redesigned to allow access from both sides. Therefore, the 100% volumetric examination is impractical for this weld. During the examination of these welds, techniques were utilized to obtain maximum possible coverage.
These welds are located on the upper head of the pressurizer and are not part of the reactor pressure vessel. These welds are not exposed to significant neutron fluence and are not prone to negative material property changes (i.e., embrittlement) associated with neutron bombardment.
The McGuire Nuclear Station Unit I Pressurizer was fabricated by Westinghouse and is free from unacceptable fabrication defects. Westinghouse performed rigorous state-of-the-art inspections following fabrication to ensure no significant flaws existed. If a leak were to occur at any of the welds in question, there are methods by which the leak could be identified for prompt Engineering evaluation. A leak at any of these welds would result in the following:
Request Relief 05-MIN-001 Page 6 of 10 a) Increased containment humidity. This parameter is indicated in the control room and this is monitored periodically by Operations and also the Containment Ventilation System Engineer.
b) Increased Pressurizer enclosure temperature. This parameter is continuously monitored by Operations via an Operator Aid Computer (OAC) alarm, and this is periodically monitored by the System Engineer.
c) Increased input into the Ventilation Unit Condensate Drain Tank (VUCDT). This parameter is monitored continuously by Operations via an OAC alarm and also periodically by the Liquid Radwaste System Engineer and Reactor Coolant System Engineer.
d) Increase in unidentified reactor coolant leakage. This parameter would be exhibited during performance of the reactor coolant leakage calculation, which is required by Technical Specifications to be performed every 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. The unidentified leakage specification in Technical Specification 3.4.13.1 is I gpm.
e) Other indicators such as containment radiation monitors EMF-38, 39 and 40, monitor the containment floor and equipment sump levels.
Note: The above parameters would be used to identify a leak in the pressurizer enclosure or containment, but could not specifically identify the exact source of the leakage. A containment entry would be required to identify the exact source of the leakage.
Also, a containment walkdown is performed when the unit reaches Mode 3 (full temperature/pressure) during the unit shutdown and startup for each refueling outage. This walkdown should identify any leak at the weld in question.
No additional B03.1 10 welds were scheduled during this outage. No additional surface or volumetric NDE examinations were performed on these welds.
Paragraph I:
Ultrasonic examination of this weld for item CO1.010 was conducted using personnel, qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VII. The examination was also performed in accordance with the requirements of ASME Section XI, Appendix III with the additional requirements of ASME Section XI, Appendix I. This weld is located on the NV System Reciprocating Charging Pump Accumulator and it is not exposed to significant neutron fluence and is not prone to negative material property changes (i.e. embrittlement) associated with neutron bombardment. If a leak were to occur at the weld in question, there are methods by which the leak could be identified for prompt Engineering evaluation. A leak at this weld would result in the following:
a) Abnormal Volume Control Tank (VCT) level trends and/or unexpected auto make-ups.
b) Increase in unidentified reactor coolant leakage. This parameter would be exhibited during performance of the reactor coolant leakage calculation, which is required by Technical Specifications to be performed every 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. The unidentified leakage specification in Technical Specification 3.4.13.1 is I gpm.
Request Relief O-NIN-oo0
'.age 7 of If) c) Increase in NDINS Sump inputs. This parameter is monitored periodically by the Liquid Radwaste System Engineer.
Also, operators perform surveillance once per shift during daily rounds of the room containing the Reciprocating Charging Pump Accumulator. This surveillance should identify any leak at the weld in question.
No additional COI.010 welds were scheduled for the Reciprocating Charging Pump Accumulator this outage. No additional surface or volumetric NDE examinations were performed on this weld.
Paragraph J:
Ultrasonic examination of this weld for item C01.010 was conducted using personnel, qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VII. The examination was also performed in accordance with the requirements of ASME Section XI, Appendix III with the additional requirements of ASME Section XI, Appendix I. This weld is located on the Seal Water Injection Filter and is not exposed to significant neutron fluence and it is not prone to negative material property changes (i.e. embrittlement) associated with neutron bombardment. If a leak were to occur at the weld in question, there are methods by which the leak could be identified for prompt Engineering evaluation. A leak at this weld would result in the following:
a) Abnormal Volume Control Tank (VCT) level trends and/or unexpected auto make-ups.
b) Increase in unidentified reactor coolant leakage. This parameter would be exhibited during performance of the reactor coolant leakage calculation, which is required by Technical Specifications to be performed every 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. The unidentified leakage specification in Technical Specification 3.4.13.1 is I gpm.
c) Increase in ND/NS Sump inputs. This parameter is monitored periodically by the Liquid Radwaste System Engineer.
One additional NDE ultrasonic examination was performed on the Seal Water Injection Filter 1A, Item Number C01.010.101 shell to lower flange weld. The results from this examination were acceptable with 90% coverage. No additional surface or volumetric NDE examinations were performed on this weld.
Paragraph K:
Ultrasonic examination of this weld for item C01.020 was conducted using personnel, qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VII. The examination was also performed in accordance with the requirements of ASME Section XI, Appendix m with the additional requirements of ASME Section XI, Appendix I. This weld is located on the Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger and is not exposed to significant neutron fluence and is not prone to negative material property changes (i.e. embrittlement) associated with neutron bombardment. If a leak were to occur at the weld in question, there are methods by which the leak could be identified for prompt Engineering evaluation. A leak at this weld would result in the following:
Request Relief 05-NIN-001 Page 8 of 10 a) Increased containment humidity. This parameter is indicated in the control room and it is monitored periodically by Operations and the Containment Ventilation System Engineer.
b) Increased input into the VUCDT. This parameter is monitored continuously by Operations via an OAC alarm and also periodically by the Liquid Radwaste System Engineer and Reactor Coolant System Engineer.
c) Increase in unidentified reactor coolant leakage. This parameter would be exhibited during performance of reactor coolant leakage calculation, which is required by Technical Specifications to be performed every 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. The unidentified leakage specification in Technical Specification 3.4.13.1 is I gpm.
d) Other indicators such as containment radiation monitors EMF-38, 39 and 40 monitor the containment floor and equipment sump levels.
Note: The above parameters would be used to identify a leak in the containment, but could not specifically identify this weld as the source of leakage. A containment entry would be required to identify the exact source of the leak.
Also, a containment walkdown is performed when the unit reaches Mode 3 (full temperature/pressure) during the unit shutdown and startup for each refueling outage.
This walkdown should identify any leak at the weld in question.
One additional NDE ultrasonic examination was performed on the (Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger, Item Number CO 1.020.020 shell to head weld. The results from this examination were acceptable with 100% coverage. No additional surface or volumetric NDE examinations were performed on this weld.
Paragraph L:
Ultrasonic examination of this weld for item CO1.020 was conducted using personnel, qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VII. The examinations were also performed in accordance with the requirements of ASME Section XI, Appendix III with the additional requirements of ASME Section XI, Appendix I. This weld is located on the NV System Reciprocating Charging Pump Accumulator and is not exposed to significant neutron fluence and is not prone to negative material property changes (i.e. embrittlement) associated with neutron bombardment. If a leak were to occur at the weld in question, there are methods by which the leak could be identified for prompt Enginerring evaluation. A leak at this weld would result in the following:
a) Abnormal Volume Control Tank (VCT) level trends and/or unexpected auto make-ups.
b) Increase in unidentified reactor coolant leakage. This parameter would be exhibited during performance of the reactor coolant leakage calculation, which is required by Technical Specifications to be performed every 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. The unidentified leakage specification in Technical Specification 3.4.13.1 is I gpm.
c) Increase in ND/NS Sump inputs. This parameter is monitored periodically by the Liquid Radwaste System Engineer.
Request Relief 05-IN-M001 Page 9 of 10 Also, operators perform surveillance once per shift during daily rounds of the room containing the Reciprocating Charging Pump Accumulator. This surveillance should identify any leak at the weld in question.
No additional C01.020 welds were scheduled for the Reciprocating Charging Pump Accumulator this outage. No additional surface or volumetric NDE examinations were performed on this weld.
Paragraph M:
Ultrasonic examination of this weld for item R01.01 I was conducted using personnel, procedures and equipment qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII, Supplement 2.
This weld is located on the outlet side of the 1A Seal Water Injection Filter Outlet Isolation Valve (INV-494) and it is not exposed to significant neutron fluence and is not prone to negative material property changes (i.e. embrittlement) associated with neutron bombardment. A leak at this weld would result in the following.
a) Abnormal Volume Control Tank (VCT) level trends and/or unexpected auto make-ups.
b) Increase in unidentified reactor coolant leakage. This parameter would be exhibited during performance of the reactor coolant leakage calculation, which is required by Technical Specifications to be performed every 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. The unidentified leakage specification in Technical Specifications 3.4.13.1 is I gpm.
c) Increase in ND/NS Sump inputs. This parameter is monitored periodically by the Liquid Radwaste System Engineer.
Two additional NDE ultrasonic examinations were performed on 2.00" diameter,.344 wall thickness welds in the NV System. The results from these examinations were acceptable with 100% coverage.
Request [Relief 05-NIN-00(1 Page 10 of 10 Other Information Jim McArdle (Principal UT NDE Level III Examiner) provided Sections Ill., IV., V. and part of Section VilI.
Ed Hyland, Bryan Meyer, Harry Vanpelt, Jack Knost and Andrew McGuire (MNS Systems Engineers) provided parts of Section VIII.
Gary Underwood (Sponsor) compiled the remaining sections of this relief request.
Sponsored By:
ku k WA9_
Date 7Z;-8 Approved By:
/-~
I I0
~
Date 7/os Attachment I UT Examination Data B03.110.002, B03.110.005 and B03.110.006 UT Examination Data C01.010.090 UT Examination Data C01.010.100 UT Examination Data CO1.020.021 UT Examination Data CO1.020.080 UT Examination Data RO.0I 1.150
DEA POWR WFN HaE WUAR STATION or
-M.
rip.
UNITI I STATUS. AS W ffACTUJO CERT*MATIN LETTER NO.
EHD. LTR. NO.
SPDxo HLUR" WtE-2%4 R.S.ffAr
[PSARMae l
L:<;.
vaD.
U Uf ain
%=w=
S s
wa 1
GA CONDITrION I MCM 1201.01-0171 001 ot*1H-oo\\
NY - Zs
AM -
3---
pZ-Z3
[#Dyers Site/Unit: McGuire /
Summary No.:
B0 Workscope:
UT Vessel Examination 01 3.110.002 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-640 2
98577763 Outage No.:
MNIEOC16 Report No.:
UT.04-081 Page:
1 of I
is' Code:
Section XI, 1995 thru 1996 Addenda Cat./ltem:
B-DIB3.110.2 Location:
NIA Drawing No.:
MCM 1201.01-170
==
Description:==
Circumferential - Nozzle to Upper Head System ID:
Component ID: B03.110.002 /1PZR-12 Size/Length:
N/A Thickness/Diameter 1.9"1 12.75" Limitations:
Yes - See Limitation calculations attached to Report no. UT.04-080 Start Time:
1030 Finish Time:
1035 Examination Surface:
Inside E Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.2.3 Wo Location:
Centerline of Wefd Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
00325 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
FISHER Serial No.:
MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:
69 F
Cal. Report No.:
CAL-04-142 Angle Used I 0 45 45T 60 60T l Scanning dB 38.8 Indication(s):
Yes 0 No i Scan Coverage:
Upstream D Downstream 0 CW ED CCW R)
Comments:
SC 03-20 Results:
Accept El Reject a Info a Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No - 73.6%
Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level II Sig ture Date Reviewer Signature Date Resor, James H.
/
3/14/2004 JayA Eaton Level liI 3116/2004 Examiner Level II S
ure Date Site Review Signature Date Leeper, Winfred C.
3114/2004 Other Level II k.iSJinatur>'
Date ANII Review Signature Date Kobernusz, Terry 4
3114/2004 0
I-J l1
- ZJK<2 0 5tl NO-QL, A771 make Pt" UT Vessel Examination
-3 EWW.
Site/Unit: McGuire /
Summary No.:
s0 Workscope:
01 3.110.002 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-820 9
98577763 Outage No.:
MNIEOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-080 Page:
1 of 2
ISI Code:
Section Xi, 1995 thru 1996 Addenda Cat./Item:
B.01B3.110.2 Location:
N/A Drawing No.:
MCM 1201.01-170
==
Description:==
Circumferential - Nozzle to Upper Head System ID:
Component ID: 803.110.002/1PZR-12 Size/Length:
N/A Thickness/Diameter 1.9"/12.75" Limitations:
Yes - See attached Limitation Report Start TIme:
1047 Finish Time:
1114 Examination Surface:
Inside E Outside 0 Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.2.3 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
00325 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
FISHER Serial No.:
MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:
69 OF Cal. Report No.:
CAL-04-143, CAL-04-144 Angle Used 0
45 45T 60 60T Scanning dB 58.7 58.7 64.8 64.8 Indication(s):
Yes E No i Scan Coverage:
Upstream D Downstream i CW 0 CCWR Comments:
FC 03-29, 03.31 Results:
Accept 0 Reject
]
Info Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No 73.6%
Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level Ii Signature Date Reviewer I L.--,SIgnature Date Resor, James H.
311412004 JayA Eaton Level III V) 311612004 Examiner Level I SI s
ure Date Site Review Signature Date Leeper, Winfred C.
3/14/2004 Other Level II S nature Date ANII Review Sjgnature Date Kobernusz, Terry
( /
3/1412004 C
J"
- I
21111L ft[AIM Limitation Record Site/Unit: McGuire /
Summary No.:
B03.
Workscope:
01 110.002 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-820 1
98577763 Outage No.:
MNlEOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-080 Page:
2 of 2
ISI 8
Description of Umitation:
ext 1Umited due to Nozzle Configuration. Aggregate coverage = 89% (weld) + 58.1% (Base metal) = 147.1 /2 = 73.6% See attached
'C calculations.
agVrCe;. CAu ALAt:,)
AtoAP
-r Tom30.
110.00S O 5 z3 lO.oo(o Sketch of Limitation:
Umitations removal requirements:
N/A Radiation field:
N/A A
Examiner Level II Signature Date Reviewer
{\\
ature Date Resor, James H.
741 3114/2004 Jay A Eaton Level III 3/16/2004 Examiner Level i f
Si Date Site Review Signature Date Leeper, Winfred C.
/
g 3/1412004 ther Level II /
6 ture Date ANII Review Sinature Date IKobernusz, Terry 3/14/2004 J
7uj 7t M-,
/i
)
= _2.t5
,}'lo,,
Dete Site/Unit: McGuire /
01 It cit; Summary No.:
B03.110.002 C
Workscope:
ISI rmination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Vessels Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-820 1
98577763 A-MArAmC 7i
£ ID 0-r-oqL...o Outage No.:
MN1EOC16 Report No.:
IUT-04-080 Page: I771 9kte311@1Jaq 0 deg Planar Scan 100.000
% Length X 100.000
% volume of length/100=
100.000
% total for 0 deg 45 deg Scan 1 100.000
% Length X Scan 2 100.000
% Length X Scan 3 100.000
% Length X Scan 4 100.000
% LengthX Add totals and divide by # scans =
100.000
% volume of length / 100 =
100.000
% total for Scan 1 54.300
% volume of length / 100 =
54.300
% total for Scan 2 100.000
% volume of length / 100 =
100.000
% total for Scan 3 100.000
% volume of length / 100 =
100.000
% total for Scan 4 88.575
% total for 45 deg Other deg 60 Scan 1 100.000
% Length X Scan 2 100.000
% Length X Scan3 100.000
% LengthX Scan 4 100.000
% Length X Add totals and divide by # scans =
98.600
% volume of length /100 =
98.600
% total for Scan 1 18.500
% volume of length / 100 =
18.500
% total for Scan 2 98.400
% volume of length / 100 =
98.400
% total for Scan 3 98.400
% volume of length / 100 =
98.400
% total for Scan 4 78.475
% total for 60 deg Percent complete coverage Add totals for each angle and scan required and divide by # of angles to determine; 89.017
% Total for complete exam J CX-up Note:
Supplemental coverage may be achieved by use f other angles / methods. When used, the coverage for volume not obtained with angles as noted above shall be cal ulated and added to Ihe total to provide the percent total for the complete examination.
Site Field Supervisor:
Date:
31 l(t
rr' AR, MAE&
I N
,.9 1 t Site/lUnit: McGuire I I
Summary No.:
B03
- f Workscope:
Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Vessels 01
.110.002 lSI Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-820 1
98SM63 ATTciA mcz3-r-mr OTY-o<A - 08b Outage No.:
MN1EOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-080 Page:
ofV 4c 3 "1
1IL 0 deg Planar Scan 100.000
% Length X 58.200
% volume of length / 100 =
58.200
% total for 0 deg 45 den Scan 1 100.000
% Length X 86.600
% volume of length 1100 =
86.600
% total for Scan 1 Scan 2 100.000
% Length X 45.000
% volume of length /100 =
45.000
% total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000
% Length X 58.200
% volume of length 1100 =
58.200
% total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000
% Length X 58.200
% volume of length /100 =
58.200
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
62.000
% total for 45 deg Other deq 60 Scan 1 100.000
% Length X 82.600
% volume of length 1 100 =
82.600
% total for Scan 1 Scan 2 100.000
% Length X 23.200
% volume of length / 100 =
23.200
% total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000
% Length X 55.200
% volume of length / 100 =
55.200
% total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000
% Length X 55.200
% volume of length /1 00 =
55.200
°% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
54.050
% total for 60 deg Percent complete coverage Add totals for each angle and scan required and divide by # of angles to determine; 58.083
% Total for complete exam Note:
?_A'51, VAlt '1Ad Supplemental coverage may be achieved by use of other angles / methods. When used, the coverage for volume not obtained with angles as noted above shall be ca lated and added to the total to provide the percent total for the complete examination.
a.1AX Site Field Supervisor:
Date:
34t4Sl-i cO
,(
v P-,
Pi§6s0-Iz 0-mn1 "$ 4 OZZLE C
xL z4_ )
()-OA
- 1 g~.5
)l~M 76i C">(
~"
+ (
z)~
.151 4
1It X Z
"5 i 1Z -';~ - H.3 -s =
1 3 I t.
00 i,7,3Z II I
- RR0, 6.5I%
0 i BP e
~
.,.°.
I i.............
51I D4CA>
KK' --
-- 1 A r- --
An~l v-elg-23 92gU5)1Z\\GQ_
mt3tt;:i Qo co~iamcc L4 3/7 S357 s~iCala-t37 i
.6 l
I 00D
=
I CON/
- Li.5 -e = 4, b-I1,
>T I O
= 55,,Z O dSZ.
i i
AVAll-- 1o3;-111 I
At \\ R4,-
23 E l
\\Or z
\\ m)S L
0OZZLC Lv:5
-m~a S\\
) (-L-C~C, '
0r L.:5-3 /
L.-: 5
)
I C L-)
=
I I
.1 I
[.
...
OZ.LE I.
I I
&io
.=
6
.eV0o
\\z
- m iL D
C LAc$
Z -
I -7 9
A3,%
4
- 3, I
- D 0.Z
~
.V i.
a FE'S OQ Act
~
.- M 45.
s is, I.,
007ZZLE.
I.
-Th
,D' T--m s I
- 0 5kZZLE7
,3e>
-(
6-,S) q.,P.)z
%,O -L 4,lo
<ADD t
CO7.}
.g j..;
Zi*~.
- .N~iG
- .
I
- 1 0
t
. et X
a"-:1-HZbt*
I-e n--
i 1
T.... :_
-MPDSA rv 0OZ7.L.E a
O CP _~%
I -),,4,
=
,S -Z, - 0 6)' ?
/I 4.5 &
bC. I D:,)
I F5
/
4
- i.
.2..
I ~
i i
fits
- _.j; _.,,
L 4i.
.4.,O
~~~~g.
I....__I 6.'..4;s o,.4.
I......_,,.
I
.;? :
X...
4C
$\\
p 4D p==
gKf 05.nlJ-ouI AdThI ?&3-7
'-~zE, es EZ0 P
~
-u I i, Z)vL,5) 4A 31 I 0 c~.
3,E c7c LA.j5/4.8 Y-s
\\0,-: -r 468 S./k:
I I
i..**
I I
S
-
I I
R4L1
ARRas-,{* Qoj A-tr.
pee,4-Z3 PjZE-,SO l
-IZ E-
- InOS 34-L oZZ.L.C L. So m s I
,AM~r MVA$1L (1Y3 (Z.
I X Z Z.
-7.25/8 -2 7
'/ IoO
.; 1r ) + ( ' ' +1.
g I I Z
)
-SI - RkD TZ
,1..
~;6 i
... l 3 / f
pV0 5-1K-C4 Am I oftt
\\S3
- rm\\ Z4bI.t IZ L4c5 go
$7-1
~lA\\<E:
Orr-317l
-s 4 (A's,0A --
- ,7t1
- 1
/0.31t
.VLi.... __
- t j
.J 3J4oy
AtT-l f\\t;wf-Z 66UZ\\ZA
A* oC ccv (5.1 izS:) - 4,3s -Z LAq 5
, 3-7 V-I a-: 58.
9 Thor. l be). Do z..
i
,/
SZ i
. iLOZW,,X,,,.,_......__...:..._.....____'_
I 2
t._
i
- /
Jo
/
i r
I,__,
} F _
./,*t i -
/
. =g.........
a_
§ of
!\\
A.
.'t:>s of
@S '-08D are. -(zos \\5--- :--
He l 1; v977/l2ti9 t
931l,@lt....
?ZEe 09 \\Z
-6)rA~
0"
- .,OmSo-3A
.1.
I -I;-
- L"5 Y. Z 14 GC
&,3,1Y 1 5Z ioo2 /o RW 6
b.
FVOA~4 00
,rdV q-3 j.2 ~
RV Qb-bra A-I
-23 I
?P76R E6 6A U
- mI Zs L
OOZZL-E.
ITh K
beO)'
G7oA SZ SA'5rhe rL
/.7Zs t l,155
,4/
P, -$-
q)
+
z.7)
V- \\D oi:
- Z 3,Z I/=
/
1
.OI r
t-
'a I.
j
.5--.
'5 X
-S.-
-I
-i
-- 5-.-.......
S
?
31tzl6y><.'-.....
I I
n0--~
0 0747,L E..
(00
.z
.Cw
' AI O'
_ q' btoz c I,>.
L 3n a 1O 66X 1°
.2 5, E )
- . L.....
~ v.
~j
,5 \\ - k'rA
AXnal y-a2c-23
?
o UT Vessel Examination Site/Unit: McGuire I Summary No.:
BO:
Workscope:
01 3.110.005
]SI Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-640 2
98577763 Outage No.:
MNIEOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-083 Page:
1 of I
Code:
Section Xi, 1995 thru 1996 Addenda Cat./ltem:
B.D/B3.110.5 Location:
NIA Drawing No.:
MCM 1201.01 170
==
Description:==
Circumferential - Nozzle to Upper Head System ID:
Component ID: B03.110.005 /lPZR-15 Size/Length:
NIA Thickness/Diameter:
1.9" 115.0" Limitations:
Yes. See Limitation calculations attached to Report no. UT-04.080 Start Time:
1035 Finish Time:,
1040 Examination Surface:
Inside 0 Outside R]
Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.2.3 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
00325 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
FISHER Serial No.:
MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:
69
- F Cal. Report No.:
CAL-04-142 Angle Used 10 45 l45T 60l 60T l Scanning dB 38.8 Indication(s):
Yes E No i Scan Coverage:
Upstream E Downstream N CW i CCW 0 Comments:
FC 03.20 Results:
Accept iD Reject Ea Info a Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No - 73.6%
Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level Ii Signature Date Reviewer l
J
\\
Vgnature Date Resor, James H.
311412004 JayA Eaton Level III L
3116/2004 Examiner Level ii
-f ure Date Site Review Signature Date Leeper, Winfred C.
311412004 Other Level I Signat Date ANII Review
,R4gatre Date Kobernusz, Terry
=/ }
3114/2004 U
J
RIzos5-RNbe
- o AT -I ?w-zL-Z-3 piQ#bEr UT Vessel Examination Site/Unit: McGuire /
Summary No.:
BO Workscope:
01 3.110.005 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-820 1
98577763 Outage No.:
MNIEOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-085 Page:
1 of lSI '
Code:
Section Xi, 1995 thru 1996 Addenda Cat./lItem:
B-DIB3.110.5 Location:
NIA Drawing No.:
MCM 1201.01-170
==
Description:==
Circumferential - Nozzle to Upper Head System ID:
Component ID: B03.110.005/IPZR-15 Size/Length:
N/A Thickness/Diameter 1.9"/15.0" Limitations:
Yes - See Limitation calculations attached to Report no. UT-04-080 Start Time:
1053 Finish Tlime:
1120 Examination Surface:
Inside 0 Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.2.3 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL 11 Batch No.:
00325 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
FISHER Serial No.:
MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:
69 OF Cal. Report No.:
CAL-04-143, CAL-04-144 Angle Used 0
45 45T 60 60T l Scanning dB 58.7 58.7 64.8 64.8 Indication(s):
Yes 2 No i Scan Coverage:
Upstream n Downstream Ri CW i CCW i Comments:
FC 03-29, 03-31 Results:
Accept i Reject I Info Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No - 73.6%
Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level II Anature Date Reviewer
/
nature Date Resor, James H.
311412004 JayA Eaton Level III J
3/1612004 Examiner Level gj ature Date Site Review Signature Date Leeper, W Lnfeed C.
3re Date R14D2004a Other Level I
IWfre Dae ANII Review Slgr) Dte Kobernusz, Terry lJ
/tVre 3/1/04 Date IADae A
Ri C5-MRN-do/
UT Vessel Examination A.1 Energy Site/Unit: McGuire /
Summary No.:
BO 01 3.110.006 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
NDE-640 Outage No.:
MNIEOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-087 2
Workscope:
ISI Work Order No.:
98577763 Page:
1 of I
Code:
Sectlon XI, 1995 thru 1996 Addenda Cat./item:
B.D/B3.110.6 Location:
NIA Drawing No.:
MCM 1201.01.170
==
Description:==
Circumferential - Nozle to Upper Head System ID:
Component ID: B03.110.006 /1PZR.16 Size/Length:
N/A Thickness/Diameter 1.9" 1 15.0" Limitations:
Yes. See Limitation calculations attached to Report no. UT-04-080 Start Tlime:
1040 Finish Tlime:
1045 Examination Surface:
Lo Location:
Inside C 9.2.3 Outside i Wo Location:
Surface Condition: AS GROUND Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
00325 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
FISHER Serial No.:
MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:
69
- F Cal. Report No.
Angle Used Scanning dB Indication(s):
CAL-04-142 r
0 45 45T l 60 l 60T I Y 38.8 N
Yes E3 No RI Scan Coverage:
Upstream a Downstream i CW 2 CCW q Comments:
FC 03-20 Results:
Accept i Reject a Info C Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No - 73.6%
I X
Rgb'705-10a 00(
A'TtsI f 46-Z3 *Z.3 UT Vessel FAamination Wiene',4;rs.
Site/Unit: McGuire /
Summary No.:
BO:
Workscope:
01 3.110.006
'Si Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-820 1
98577763 Outage No.:
MNIEOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-088 Page:
1 of I
Code:
Section Xi, 1995 thru 1996 Addenda Cat./Item:
B-DIB3.110.6 Location:
N/A Drawing No.:
MCM 1201.01-170
==
Description:==
Clrcumferential - Nozzle to Upper Head System ID:
Component ID: B03.110.006/IPZR-16 Size/Length:
N/A Thickness/Diameter 1.9"/ 15.0" Limitations:
Yes. See Limitation calculations attached to Report no. UT-04-080 Start Time:
1059 Finish Tlme:
1126 Examination Surface:
Inside 2 Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.2.3 Wo Location:
Centeriine of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
00325 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
FISHER Serial No.:
MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:
69 F
Cal. Report No.:
CAL-04-143, CAL-04-144 AngleUsed 0
l0 45 l45Tl 60 60T l l Scanning dB 58.7 58.7 64.8 64.8 Indication(s):
Yes E No i Scan Coverage:
Upstream a Downstream 2 CW 0 CCW i Comments:
FC 03-29, 03-31 Results:
Accept 0 Reject fl Info 0 Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No - 73.6%
Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level Ii Sign re Date Reviewer Signature Date Resor, James H.
?
3114/2004 JayA Eaton Level III 3116/2004 Examiner Level Ii I
re Date Site Review Signature Date Leeper, Winfred C.
311412004 Other Level II na Date ANII Review Signature Date Kobernusz, Terry 311412004 1
IRR (t5-M-OIC INV-2
-vm %-e.
F E
0 C
teK's?"CUM5@t 1201.94-4 t3r*S.I MCM 1201.04-0197 001 OA CONDITION I 1 l 1.,
I I
I I
I 0
C',
B 9N
\\ - 6 i
l I I
I I-1 I
I
-Io =x__I
1wpke.UT Vessel Examination Site/Unit: McGuire /
Summary No.:
Co, Workscope:
01 1.010.090
'SI Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-330 0
98577988 Outage No.:
MNlEOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-039 Page:
1 of 4
Code:
Section Xl, 1995 thru 1996 Addenda Cat./ltem:
C-AIC1.10.90 Location:
N/A Drawing No.:
MCM 1201.04-197
==
Description:==
Circumferential - Flange to Shell System ID:
Component ID: C01.010.090 /IRCPA-8-1 Size/Length:
N/A Thickness/Diameter
.4951 6.660 Limitations:
Yes-See Attached Limitation Report Start Time:
0950 Finish Time:
1008 Examination Surface:
Inside E Outside 0 Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.2.1 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
00325 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
FISHER Serial No.:
MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:
68
- F Cal. Report No.:
CAL-04-084, CAL-04-085, CAL-04-086 AngleUsed I 0 45 l45T 60 60T 60L Scanning dB 54 55 64 Indication(s):
Yes ° No NI Scarl Coverage:
Upstream [
Downstream 0 CW i CCW 0 Comments:
Scanned at reference DB due to signal to noise ratio Results:
Accept i Reject a]
Info al Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No - 74.4%
Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level II Sign re Date Reviewer Si nature Date Leeper, Wlnfred C.
2/2412004 Jay A Eaton Level III 2/26/2004 Examiner Level II Ig
)
Date Site Review Signature Date Jordan, Joey C
2/24/2004 Other Level N/A
.ignature Date ANII Reviewl W-Signature
.1 Date N/A 9I.
AMAW01M Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe
-~It f Site/Unit: McGulre /
t e Summary No.:
C011.
Ih Workscope:
0Oc (
ies 01
.010.090 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-330 0
98577988 Outage No.:
MN1 EOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-039 Page:
2 of 4
SIs 45 deg Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000
% Length X
% Length X
% Length X
% Length X 81.700 68.300 69.500 69.500
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length /100 =
81.700
% total for Scan 1 68.300
% total for Scan 2 69.500
% total for Scan 3 69.500
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
72.250
% total for 45 deg Other deg -
60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000
% Length X
% Length X
% Length X
% Length X 8.500
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length /100 =
% volume of length /1 00 =
% volume of length /1 00 =
8.500
% total for Scan 1
% total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by of scans to determine; 74.375
% Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:
-a <
1 V Date:
%lZ, lo, I Ic
!l>0 3
6
MkMAM Limitation Record Site/Unit: McGuire /
01 Summary No.:
C01.010.090 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-330 0
98577988 Outage No.:
MN1EOC16 8
T Workscope:
ISI X
- Description of Umitation:
Oh Umited due to flange 4O N 5 IIO6-5 6
Report No.:
UT-04-039 Page:
3 of 4
5L-A.3 k C - e,,Z L A'S 5\\
_o S
Sketch of Umitation:
v xt v
s K
_- a81 I
s'Z -= (01BS1.3 VX A 4
L6'° C CA L
.5%
tob L-50?LCY~ -,AL C 9 L':Z /-:
x Radiation field:
NIA SfX C
?ad (%L LA 0 q
fo-o CIs COoMD Examiner Level 11 Signatur Date Reviewer
/ignature Date Leeper, Winfred C.
4/2004 Jay A Eaton Level III 2t26/2004 Examiner Lovel I1t Date Site Review
/gnature Date Jordan, Joey 2/24/2004 Other Level N/A Zotignature Date ANII Review Signature Date W
NA
/7 J0J
MbkI Artim rd-Oa FM-W7.
Supplemental Report
_ 0 i
12Summary No.: C01.010.090
't Examiner. Leeper, Winfred C.
e:
II ala -
Examiner. Jordan, Joe 4vei:
II Ce Other: W/A Level:
N/A Report No.:
UT-04-039 Pa e:
4 of 4
Reviewer. Jay A Eaton Level I Date: 2/26/2004 Site Review Date:
ANII Review.
Date:
0V Comments:
Total Exam Area = (1.65 x OA95) + (0.2 x 0.05 / 2) = 0.82 sq. In.
Percent of Coverage:
450 shear from S1 = (1.1 + 1.612) x 0.495 = 0.67/0.82 x 100 = 81.7%
450 shear from S2 =((1.1 5 + 0.65 / 2) x 0.495) + (0.4 x 0.55 / 2) = 0.56 / 0.82 x 100 = 68.3%
45 shear CW & CCW = 1.15 x 0.495 = 0.57 /0.82 x 100 = 69.5%
60°L supplemental = (0.2 x 1.65) + ((1.1 + 1.65 /2) x 0.295) = 0.74/0.82 x 100 = 90.2%
Additional coverage with 60°L = 90.2% - 81.7% (450 shear) = 8.5%.
Site/Unit: McGuire /
Summary No.:
Co Workscope:
UT Vessel Examination K 05-MV3-601 Outage No.:
MNIEOC16 Report No.:
UJT-04-046 Page:
1 of I
01 1.010.090 ISI Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-330 0
98577988 Code:
Section Xl, 1995 thru 1996 Addenda Cat./ltem:
C-AIC1.10.90 Location:
N/A Drawing No.:
MCM 1201.04-197
==
Description:==
Circumferential - Flange to Shell System ID:
Component ID: COI.010.090 /IRCPA-8-1 Size/Length:
N/A Thickness/Diameter
.49516.660" Limitations:
Yes-See Limitation Report no. Ut-04-39 sheets 2,3 & 4.
Start Time:
0850 Finish Time:
0853 Examination Surface:
Inside a Outside 0 Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.2.1 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL It Batch No.:
00325 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
FISHER Serial No.:
MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:
68 F
Cal. Report No.:
CAL-04-090 Angle Used 0
45 45T 60 60T l Scanning dB 54 Indication(s):
Yes °l No 9]
Scan Coverage: Upstream i]
Downstream E CW El CCW C-Comments:
Scanned at Reference DB due to signal to noise ratio - Scanned upstream for additional coverage Results:
Accept i Reject [
Info El Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No
- 74.4%
Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level II S
atur Date Reviewer 1
ignature Date Leeper, Winfred C.
V 2/25/2004 Jay A Eaton Level III 2/26/2004 Examiner Level II 9
eDate Site Review Signature Date Jordan, Joey 2/25/2004 Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review Signature Date N/A
A3t. 3 fkv-S 3
0RNG-COVER 33 SULM WELDE-ENT I83405-01 WELOO 304 ssr 34 COVER WELtE-NT 83229-OI WELOEO 304 SST
_5BOLT L NE-WIN-2 Ny5r-311 AR90N STE L HR I
36j* PIN-SvING
_2.~
82346-3 A4REO STEL HROM A~TE ING 82346-34 CARBON STEEL.
CHR(*E PLATEI 38_ WASHER 82352-3 CARBON STEEL CHRc '
PLATE INA 35 80LT-HEX HEAD 83535-3. CAR3CN STEEL.
H PLA 40 NatE PLATE I
34689-U ALIUINUHI NA
- merwe-mict-No?-;-Zo Hj.
W EuQl cA,,Atyc",r-s 25y2 4
-41p -----
57 HfIM.
f.
CLEARANCE REO FOR
/
\\REMOVAL OF CARTRIDGE
-/
IRo-4 -ca5°MCM 1201.04-0027 001 em, _
OA CONDITION 1
RX 05-Mta-0o1 ATr.3 2fXi-Z-5 Po"nergy.
SitefUnit: McGuire I Summary No.:
Co Workscope:
UT Vessel Examination 01 1.010.100 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-330 is' 0
98577988 Outage No.:
MNIEOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-041 Page:
1 of 4
Code:
Section XI, 1995 thru 1996 Addenda Cat./Item:
C-A/CI.10.100 Location:
N/A Drawing No.:
MCM 1201.04-27
==
Description:==
Circumferential - Shell to Upper Flange System ID:
Component ID: C01.010.100 I1ASWINJF-1 Size/Length:
NIA Thickness/Diameter
.43814.0" Limitations:
Yes-See Attached Limitation Report Start Time:
0955 Finish Time:
1010 Examination Surface:
Inside Q Outside P Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.2.1 Wo Location:
Cinterline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
00325 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
FISHER Serial No.:
MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:
86
- F Cal. Report No.:
CAL-04-087, CAL-04-088, CAL-04-089 Angle Used l
0 45 45T 60 60Tl 60Ll Scanning dB 50 58 61 Indication(s):
Yes a No i Scan Coverage:
Upstream i1 Downstream a CW ED CCW 0 Comments:
Scanning DB less than reference + 14 to obtain 2: 1 signal to noise ratio on all three scans Results:
Accept i]
Reject El Info El Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No
- 64.4%
Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level II Signature Date Reviewer nature Date Weaver, Marion T.
,.v2125/2004 JayA Eaton Level III 312/2004 Examiner LeveBlI na Date Site Review Signature Date Jordan, Joey 2/25/2004 Other Level NIA
/
gnature Date ANII Review Signature Date
Aikrian Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit: McGuire /
01 8 1 Summary No.:
C01.0110.1100 I
M A
I Workscope:
ISI cc 45 deg Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-330 0
98577988 Outage No.:
MN1EOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-041 Page:
2 of 4
Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000
% Length X 100.000
% Length X 100.000
% Length X 100.000
% Length X 63.200 67.600 61.800 61.800
% volume of length /100 =
% volume of length /100 =
% volume of length/ I00 =
% volume of length / 100 =
63.200 67.600 61.800 61.800
% total for Scan 1
% total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
63.600
% total for 45 deg Other deg -
60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4
% Length X 100.000
% Length X
% Length X
% Length X
% volume of length / 100 =
3.000
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
3.000
% total for Scan 1
% total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 64.350
% Total for complete exam l
Site Field Supervisor:
N SiteFiel Su ervior:
ate Date:
31 Z l° O
.F 3-r
mlkni,41A rosiuW_-
Limitation Record I "1 Site/Unit:
70 Summary No.:
I, R Workscope:
McGuire /
01 C01.010.100 IsI Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
NDE-330 Outage No.:
Report No.:
MN1EOC16 UT-04-041 0
98577988 Work Order No.:
Page:
3 of 4
~
t L-aO > Description of Umitation:
W r Umited due to Flange configuration UPPM IAA-kE -St q{sl
.°AE-L rom -SI -= ( 0S3.Z1-IAX I
\\\\\\l
(;
. to Lt
-S S IVA tZ v%-
I w\\\\
44$
ASCAe C-
= 4IIb.
r o 1
j 0
l mK§1 (o° 5oPmc e
^SP-;)5Z z 7a (-
-I -..*****.%-...---.'-'
I Radiation field:
N/A
.7A I -..
a 4 O L
f4 :
t CAL.CJ.LA-nlj5S e-C-.
Examiner Level Ii Signature Date Reviewer
\\.Signature Date Weaver, Marion T.
2125/2004 Jay A Eaton Level III 3121004 Examiner Level II Date Site Review Signature Date Jordan, Joey 212512004 Other Level N/A
/
ignature Date ANII Review Signature Date N/A
-32 y
- Ž>
. \\ c'\\!et
Mik jSupplem oln SummaryNo.: C01.010.100 o G Examiner Weaver, Marion L
l Examiner Jordan, Joey G
el:
II Other N/A Level:
N/A ental Report Report No.:
UT-04-041 Papje:
4 of 4
Reviewer Site Review:
ANII Review:
Eaton Level e: 3/22004 Comments:
Total Examination Area = (1.5 x 0.438) + ((0.1 x 0.5) / 2) = 0.68 sq. in.
45° shear from S1 = ((0.7 + 0.35 / 2) x 0.438) + ((0.25 +0.55 /2) x 0.5) = 0.43 /0.68 x 100 = 63.2%
45e shear from S2 = ((0.75 + 1.25 / 2) x 0.438) + (0.25 x 0.2 / 2) = 0.46/0.68 x 100 = 67.6%
45 shear CW & CCW = (0.7 x 0.438) + ((0.3 +0.1 / 2) x 0.55) = 0.42/0.68 x 100 =61.8%
60°L supplemental = (0.7 + 1.5 / 2) x 0.438 = 0.48 /0.68 x 100 = 70.6%
Additional coverage with 60°L = 70.6% - 67.6% = 3%
APPROVED.
CO.Pwa PLA.T DUKE POVER COMPANYT PLA14f#r MPCCUIRE XUCLiAR STATION 1UNIT:
I o"d ?
Spin:
CSAHCL STATUS:
CIRTM7ED FOR COP(STRUCTIOK
¶ CERTIFICATION: LETTER RO.
OUKE.1416 tLL tIoZLIES AQt 5 Lpr PC-ALITNORITY:
J.
- 0. WOODSON Nor 2 NG :U.
NO AE1051
__a n ts NPC N4MT v
- ClaI wwa C.
'I...
_to"___I a*C C
L-M-
I-W y~n, C
ISCWT
,fu.
Y' f
46 S1 OX L.I SA OOLAT. AL SIIC %'4(`61I I
I 1'T a
U-.tM W.A Ioawri~'
A MNMCI(
C% d1 4S
-V.
V
.4-
! MTT etoC
- ,S4 AP o**
aw I.
- c&St
&5U AP"an f
OmvEDisgo A
- P jC l& e--
TP 0
\\
Qo-. O
1%
a.5, -R
-06 P dt UT Base Met
,amination V
Site/Unit: McGuire /
Summary No.:
C01 Workscope:
01 1.020.021 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-640 2
98578064 Outage No.:
MNlEOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-095 Page:
1 of 2
is' Code:
Section XI, 1995 thru 1996 Addenda Cat lem:
C-A/C1.20.21 Location:
N/A Drawing No.:
MC ISIN-1554.01.02
==
Description:==
Circumferential - Head to Flange System ID:
NV Component ID: C01.020.021 /1ELDHX-HD-FLG Size/Length:
9.50 SS/CS Thickness/Diameter:
0.75" Limitations:
No Start Time:
1041 Finish Time:
1049 Examination Surface:
Inside Q Outside 0 Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
Top of Heat Exchanger Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
FISHER Serial No.:
MCNDE 27220 Surface Temp.:
70 OF Scanning dB:
Cal. Report No.:
CAL-04-156 Ind.
Amplitude Positlion One Position Max Position Two Loss Remarics No.
Back Wal Full Screm LI WI W2 MP LM WI W2 MP L2 WI W2 MP NRI Comments:
FC 03.20, *42.0 Db on Flange side - CS & 32.0 Db on the Head side -SS.
Results:
Accept i Reject E Info EJ Initial Section Xl Examination Percent Of Coverage Obtained> 90%:
Yes - 100%
Reviewed Previous Data:
No Examiner Level i
Signature Date Reviewer
/
1 0_glnature Date Brown, Thomas 3/16/2004 Jay A Eaton Level III 3/19/2004 Examiner Lavei Signau Date Site Review Signature Date Moss, Gary J.
_AA 3f16/2004A Other Level N/A Y(
Signature Date ANII Reve Signature 1
/
Date N/A
/.
23/
t (I'
- .1 I
/
I
R(Ca -KA-Wl 9C\\- A VwII3-ft
[S;egy.
Summary No.: C01.020.021 Examiner: Brown, Thomas'=
,7 2) j Examiner: Moss, Gary J. t1064 /j Other: N/A SupplemetLa1 Report Report No.:
Page:
Jay A Eaton Level Ill a
A a
J -
g UT.04.095 2
of 2
Date: 3119/2004 Date:
Date: ;-7 2 0 Level:
II Level:
II Level:
N/A Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
P
/
Comments:
Sketch or Photo:
N:\\UT\\IDDEAL\\ProfiieLene2.Jpg 4,
0*
4\\) e
P'Cas -A0 0, L Aft-At ?O't -
Pkmke UT Vessel Eamination V.
Site/Unit: McGuire I Summary No.:
Co Workscope:
01 1.020.021 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-330 9
98578064 Outage No.:
MNIEOC16 Report No.:
UT.04-096 Page:
1 of 8
'Si Code:
Section XI, 1995 thru 1996 Addenda Cat./item:
C-AICI.20.21 Location:
N/A Drawing No.:
MC-ISIN-1554-01.02
==
Description:==
Circumferential - Head to Flange System ID:
NV Component ID: C01.020.021 /1ELDHX-HD-FLG Size/Length:
9.5"SSICS Thickness/Diameter 0.75" Limitations:
Yes. See attached limitation reports Start Time:
1100 Finish Time:
1156 Examination Surface:
Inside n Outside 0 Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
Top of Heat Exchanger Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
FISHER Serial No.:
MCNDE 27220 Surface Temp.:
70 OF Cal. Report No.:
CAL-04-157, CAL-04-158, CAL-04-159 AngleUsed l 0l 45 45T 60 60T l 45L Scanning dB l
l 63 Indication(s):
Yes 2 No SD Scan Coverage:
Upstream i1 Downstream i CW i CCW i Comments:
Scanning Db with 45@ = 54.1, 56.0 Db with the 45OT CS & SS sides. 45'L scanned @ Ref. due to signal to noise ratio.
Results:
Accept i Reject IZ Info M Initial Section Xl Examination Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No - 79.8%
Reviewed Previous Data:
No Examiner Level ii Signature Date Reviewer Signature Date Brown, Thomas 3116/2004 Jay A Eaton Level III 311912004 Examiner Level IIib M
Signature Date Site Review Signa e
Date Moss, GaryJ.
J'I 3/16/2004 Other Level N/A Y k Signature Date ANII Re ie ature Date NIA
,vC
/. _
3/2.
O' (I
/
/
i
ML f Limitation Record 90 t S
Site/Unit: McGuire Summary No.:
Co, o v Workscope:
fI
°CS Description of Umitation:
See attached calculations.
I 01 1.020.021 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-330 1
98578064 Outage No.:
Report No.:
MN1 EOC1 6 UT-04-096 lSI Page:
2 of 8
Sketch of Umitation:
Umitations removal requirements:
NIA Radiation field:
N/A Examiner Level II Signature Date Reviewer Sig ttre Date Brown, Thomak_
{.
2 3/16/2004 JayAEaton Levelill 3/1912004 Examiner Level Q Mature Date Site Review 7
'ignat;/e/
Date Moss, GaryJ.
/JfI 3/16/2004 A
)ther Level N/A Vl Signature Date ANII Rev Sig ure te lN/A l
27/
0
,..../
V I\\
>1' s\\t
D1 fDe
-0 So Site/Unit: McGuire /
01 r
Summary No.:
C01.020.021 0°H Workscope:
[Si ao termination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-330 1
98578064 Outage No.:
MN1EOC16 Report No.:
UT-04*096 Page:
3 of 8
45 dei Scan 1 51.600
% Length X 100.000
% volume of length /1 00 =
51.600
% total for Scan 1 Scan 2 51.600
% Length X 100.000
% volume of length/ IGO =
51.600
% total for Scan 2 Scan 3 51.600
% Length X 100.000
% volume of length / 100 =
51.600
% total for Scan 3 Scan 4 51.600
% Length X 100.000
% volume of length / 100 =
51.600
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
51.600
% total for 45 deg Other den -
45 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 48.400
% Length X 79.100
% volume of length / 100 =
48.400
% Length X 37.300
% volume of length / 100 =
48.400
% Length X 58.200
% volume of length / 100 =
48.400
% Length X 58.200
% volume of length /100 =
38.284
% total for Scan 1 18.053
% total for Scan 2 28.169
% total for Scan 3 28.169
% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 79.769
%Total Icr complete exam C4 IVL Date:
31 (' 1O Site Field Supervisor:
.31
9A OST-0%-
I\\W A,
- U DUKE POWER COMPANY l-y, -O°
- -o'4o ISI LIMITATION REPORT ComponentlWeld ID: Iu
_-Ut-.LLc Item No:
CID I -. 00Z.
OZ.1 remarks:
I NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION gDE; D
Jet E
LIMITED SCAN E
1
[2"2 E'
1 0
2 ["
cw [Ylccw FROM L
-Z1.
to L 3o.V INCHES FROMWO +.3S to 1- -io ANGLE:
E 0 i'45 E:60 other FROM DEG to DEG
' NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Doc D
t El LIMITEDSCAN E
1
[2
["1 El 2 []Thcw [2ccw FROM L to L LA.0 INCHES FROM WO +
to 1Se,04 ANGLE:
j O E3045
[g/60 other FROM DEG to DEG NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION o-; O E
LIMITED SCAN El 1 W"2
[;'1 El 2 [~cw !}'ccw FROM L I\\. 1I to L g.t5 INCHES FROM WO 4 0.o to ANGLE:
L O i/45 E}40 other FROM DEG to DEG 2'
NO SCAN El LIMITED SCAN SURFACE 0l 1
[3/2 BEAM DIRECTION 2/1 El 2 L9 cw g/ccw e>
-p'p%) VPC, FROM L V1(*'
toL IZS ANGLE:
El 0 Q'45 2'60 ot Prepared By:
a INCHES FROM WO t4-.$t to SEI FROM DEG to DEG Sketch(s) attached.
E'yes E No ther Levef-Date:..,4.°c1 Reviewed By:
Date:
31 ZI I IAuthorized 1i I I I ' I I -
p V V
Mrs g, 1*
>Z C 1J-7Lt.
VI/ e U'D *t:- 11 1-:' LT;l A)Ill 1-;> -
-s23T/o
- /</Rl 7 WC, P*LAO (x5: -
5 t
- Doors3, SoFr VA
+ -v-----
u ?17 T, -e~A r'
- I-(is '
-~( 27 ')
(.3-1
jO 7-it M
L5 t
-vD-A L~4
~-
Dt; o/X
_A L.
ot
_CZ.
o
.(
7-.Ot1,
'P 1'3 P1ec I55
'SI5-Ps I
3-.S
>,4 iOO -
I
/O 0Ur-OL4 - oi r A
_ c F 7443 1 Or I9 I 1 yo 3 1 L5-jofj
a X
O --
- o v/OtZ.O. cn
. /p, Rlr>At J 7 I K feL-V ir I IE LV ~As - Wp-f PFLAO Lx
-':t I Vcrw el
\\
^
i, ADD~(l
-5%*Z-US&TFrA A
\\
\\
)
\\
-I-N o/ Ca
.AF4-'
0$D ma v C2 LAsvVhiTAingOJS 1.5H
,4
,I
/
O(C
, V3(-
xC IC A
)> r toL I I A %
0/o or-oLA c Ol (
VP, kc-I !!
Parta Xi[
3101D)
Col. 0 OZc. cnz gLr /Oir I
, VJ-.Y/DrXAt Jl FlPG I
FLAO)L%
-SI povaIl She YV VAV-'2 - 4 I 1
71 L4' O
r F-e, l,
-A, vnDS I.5LA IS'
.1L
/Ij It I,
-L --
8,1.
'SC) I D 7 IG I.3 -1
'> \\ O Y.
3/
r -So-i-w Oct l !!
- 312A*16t1
- 'I 3 l1'
Mrs3/4
- Qo.
C
)z1
\\aJ)z t
[A
-Fp Too I
tO/.ht F*LAk-)[L%
-S I VpLo-34 'So 1
Ok.1 sou:p - S t I les 6v L°?-5TF-ArA
" vv Li 5S CL WI m ffbS 1I3q I 7-I I
'S I4, 7 1 t
Z 11 /1.36 q I °'
= USS. L, /o Ur-oLi- 00o(o v-Ad Ken ol °>
I II ViLa 1-* O
10 In
-1
I F
E D
C AAIAMfI SAMtI
"?We Ct5n 3
It' "I
1
-S 1CM 1201.04-0197 001 OA CONDITION I I
I I
I I
a CD B
v E-rtg;mk hwP~Al-S' I
I I
I I
l-.
1 I S
1 1 11 1=
ii!I i I I
i zt T$tL Ak#I
SK Ora-it4-l AP:
Ts PeMas 1(
Site/Unit: McGuire /
Summary No.:
Co Workscope:
UT Vessel Examination 01 1.020.080 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-330 0
Outage No.:
MNlEOC16 Report No.:
UT.04-040 Page:
1 of 4
Sit 98577988 Code:
Section XI, 1995 thru 1996 Addenda Cat/Iltem:
C.A/C1.20.80 Location:
N/A Drawing No.:
MCM 1201.04-197
==
Description:==
- Clrcumferentlal -Shell to Head System ID
ComponentID: C01.020.08011RCPA-10-1 Size/Length:
NIA Thickness/Diameter
.495/6.660 Limitations:
Yes-See Attached Limitation Report Start Time:
0950 Finish Time:
1008 Examination Surface:
Inside a Outside 0 Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.2.1 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
00325 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
FISHER Serial No.:
MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:
68 OF Cal. Report No.:
CAL-04-084, CAL-04-085, CAL-04.086 Angle Used l 0 45 45T 60 60Tl 60Ll Scanning dB l
54 55 64 Indicationfs):
Yes al No R Scan Coverage:
Upstream E Downstream 0 CW i CCW El Comments:
Scanned at reference DB due to signal to noise ratio Results:
Accept i Reject C Info CD Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No -71.1%
Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level I Sig re Date Reviewer Signature Date Leeper, Winfred C.
2124/2004 Jay A Eaton Level III 2161004 Examiner Level II Si re Date Site Review Signature Date Jordan, Joey 2/24/2004 Other Level N/A "Signature Date ANII Review Signature Date N/A
- PBy, De 0
l Be SiteAJnit: McGuire /
01 Summary No.:
C01.020.080 A
Workscope:
ISI termination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-330 0
98577988 Outage No.:
MN1EOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-040 Page:
2 of 4
45 deq Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000
% Length X 100.000
°/% Length X 100.000
% Length X 100.000
% Length X 51.300 77.500 71.500 71.500
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
51.300 77.500 71.500 71.500
% total for Scan 1
% total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
67.950
% total for 45 deg Other deg -
60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4
% Length X
% volume of length / 100 =
100.000
% LengthX 12.500
%volumeoflength/100=
% Length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% Length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 1 12.500 rtotalforScan2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 71.075
%Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:
IIA'l
' I Date:
d v (
-v
I ar Site/Unit: McGuire I
.r¢ Summary No.:
C01.020.0f L0 Workscope:
ISI ts Description of Umitation:
Z Umited due to head configuration Limitation Record 01 80 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
NDE-330 0
Outage No.:
MN1EOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-040 Work Order No.:
98577988 Page:
3 of S"ES-L - SZ Sketch of Umitation:
I 05&r'-
5 L7 I
.,>7
. \\ \\ \\ \\ Y \\I 4
" C 4
C ZC.A 75 (pDOL SJ??LCMi,3A-~ '9/° I X
.t -u-.--.
.5 Vr
'PAk LC w
LA01: LA v-o(L c~it-cou A-n o.3:S Radiation field:
N/A I
Examiner Level II u
re Date Reviewer nature Date Leeper, Winfred C.
2124/2004 Jay A Eaton Level III 2=26/2004 Examiner Level II ai r
Date Site Review ature Date Jordan, Joey V224/2004 ther Level N
IA Signature Date ANII Review Signature Date lWA 3-A,_
qj-- 'xck,
,"L--
m x
Supplemental Report 4
Report No.:
UT-04-040 Pa0e:
4 of 4
n g1 Summary No.: C01.020.080 t
Examiner Leeper, Winfred C.
e:
II Reviewer. Jay A Eaton LevelI rate: 2/26/2004 Examiner. Jordan, Joey l:
II Site Review, Date:
Other: W/A Level:
N/A ANII Review:
Date:
Comments:
Total Exam Area = (1.6 x 0.495) + (0.25 x 0.1 12) = 0.8 sq In.
45° shear from S1 = (1.05 + 0.6 / 2) x 0.495 = 0.41 /0.8 x 100 = 51.3%
45' shear from S2 = (1.0 + 1.5/2) x 0.495 = 0.62/0.8 x 100 = 77.5%
45' shear CW & CCW = 1.15 x 0.495 = 0.57/0.8 x 100 = 71.25%
60°L supplemental from S2 = (0.2 x 1.6) + (1.1 + 1.6 / 2 x 0.295) = 0.72/0.8 x 100 = 90%
Additional coverage gained with 60'L = 90% - 77.5% (coverage with 45°) = 12.5%
q', 11
4;"
rk s rl'-b pofwe UT Vessel Exdmination Site/Unit: McGuire /
Summary No.:
Co Workscope:
01 1.020.080 Is[
Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-330 0
98577988 Outage No.:
MNlEOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-047 Page:
1 of I
Code:
Section Xi, 1995 thru 1996 Addenda Cat./ltem:
C-A(CI.20.80 Location:
N/A Drawing No.:
MCM 1201.04-197
==
Description:==
- Clrcumferential -Shell to Head System ID
Component ID: C01.020.080 I1RCPA-10-1 Size/Length:
N/A ThicknesstDiameter
.495/6.660" Limitations:
Yes-See Limitation Report no. UT-04-40 page 2,3 and 4 Start Time:
0853 Finish nlme:
0856 Examination Surface:
Inside D Outside E Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.2.1 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
00325 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
FISHER Serial No.:
MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:
68 OF Cal. Report No.:
CAL-04-090 Angle Used 0 °l45 45T 60 60T l Scanning dB 54 Indication(s):
Yes DJ No P Scan Coverage:
Upstream i Downstream C CW a CCW C Comments:
Scanned at Reference DB due to signal to noise ratio - Scanned upstream for additional coverage Results:
Accept i Reject a Info D Percent Of Coverage Obtained >. 90%:
No*71.1%
Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level II Si ture Date Reviewer Signature Date Leeper, Winfred C.
2/25/2004 Jay A Eaton Level ill 2/26/2004 Examiner Level ig Date Site Review Signature Date Jordan, Joey 2125'2004 Other Level NA Ignature Date ANII Review Signature Dt 3-t
-i
KS C3-V\\VJ t A.R 1-3 rW~nerg.
UT Pipe Weld Examination SitefJnit: McGuire /
Summary No.:
RO Workscope:
01 1.011.150 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-600 15 98577988 Outage No.:
MN1EOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-048 Page:
1 of 3
'SI Code:
Section Xi, 1995 thru 1996 Addenda Catiltem:
/R1.11.150 Location:
Drawing No.:
MCFI-1 NV175
==
Description:==
Reducer to Pipe System ID:
NV Component ID: R01.011.150 /1NVP888-1 Slze/Length:
N/A Thickness/Diameter
.344/2.0 Limitations:
Yes
- see attached limitation report Start Time:
0928 Finish Time:
0938 Examination Surface:
Inside E]
Outside 0 Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.1.1.4 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
FISHER Serial No.:
MCNDE 27217 Surface Temp.:
81 OF Cal. Report No.:
CAL-04-092, CAL-04-093, CAL-04-094 Angle Used 0
45 45T 601 70 I =
Scanning dB 50.0 48.5 52.0 Indication(s):
Yes E No i Scan Coverage:
Upstream i Downstream a1 CW i CCW j3 Comments:
Results:
Accept i Reject El Info El INITIAL ISI EXAMINATION Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No-35.6%
Reviewed Previous Data:
No Examiner Level Ill Signature Date Reviewer Signature Date Zimmerman, David K.
4 i
2/25/2004 Jay A Eaton Level ill 2/26/2004 Examiner Level II Signatu J
Date Site Review Signature Date Leeper, Winfred C.
1./JA.,,+'
2/25/2004 Other Level N/A
'Signature Date ANII Review A
Signature Date N/A
a}
Site/Unit: Mc 03 Summary No.:
C r Workscope:
Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Guire I 01 R01.011.150
'SI Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-600 15 98577988 Outage No.:
MN1EOC16 Report No.:
UT-04-048 Page:
2 of 3
45 deg Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4
% Length X
% Length X 100.000
% Length X 100.000
% Length X 50.000 50.000 0/0 volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length 1 100 =
% total for Scan 1
% total for Scan 2 50.000
% total for Scan 3 50.000
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
50.000
% total for 45 deg Other deg -
60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 100.000
% Length X 42.500
% Length X 0.000
% Length X
% Length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
42.500
%/o total for Scan 1 0.000
% total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 35.625
% Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:
- B Date:
t
/Zf/O /
zJ-e4 Afc 1-7 0
or
0' P0 Site/Unit:
0
-9 Summary No.:
V t Workscope:
W-Limitation Record McGuire /
01 R01.011.150 ISt Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-600 Outage No.:
Report No.:
MN1EOC16 UT-04-048 15 98577988 Page:
3 of Description of Umitation:
Valve 494/socket weld attaching to butt weld between pipe and reducer Sketch of Umitation:
L jC n
(.0 sq4oy Cs0jaw :
.Lo,Cs; 1.r-
.to<Y~i).,b,>-=
.001Rws.t g-Io
-47," 1.
o~lU "1e-170C 564w
- 5.
- L (
I -]
.oz
,rC>
ZI
.I I*D tio A.)D -.
t<CA Wo.~
VAAL¶Jt LA'i4 Limitations removal requirements:
N/A l
. ` N ?;1 Radiation field:
Examiner Level iII Signature Date Reviewer Si nature Date Zimmerman, David K.
i Zv= 2/25/2004 S
An C
A z
I ZZ.1cm Examiner Level 1
. Si;n 9 i Date Site Review Signature ate Leeper, Winfred C.
2/25/2004 Jther Level G Signature Date ANII Review Signature Date I~ -_--
C