ML042680141
| ML042680141 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 09/13/2004 |
| From: | Rosalyn Jones Duke Power Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 04-ON-009 | |
| Download: ML042680141 (87) | |
Text
Duke RON A. JONES ta Power. Vice President Oconee Nuclear Site A Duke Energy Company Duke Power ON0I VP / 7800 Rochester Highway Seneca, SC 29672 864 885 3158 864 885 3564 fax September 13, 2004 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Duke Energy Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Docket Nos. 50-270 Third Ten Year Inservice Inspection Interval Requests for Relief No. 04-ON-009 Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii), attached is a Request for Relief from the requirement to examine 100% of the volume specified by the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1989 Edition with no Addenda (as modified by Code Case N-460).
Request for Relief 04-ON-009 is to allow Duke Energy to take credit for ten (10) limited ultrasonic examinations on welds associated with various systems and components described in the attached request.
During examination of the subject Unit 2 welds, the ultrasonic examination coverage did not meet the 90%
examination requirements of Code Case N-460. The obtainable volume coverage for each weld examination is indicated on the attached request. Achievement of greater examination coverage for these welds is impractical due to piping/valve geometry, interferences, and existing examination technology. Therefore, Duke Energy requests that the NRC grant relief as authorized under 10 CFR 50.55a(g) (6) (i).
cDq-?
www. dukepower. corn
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission September 13, 2004 Page 2 If there are any questions or further information is needed you may ntact R. P. Todd at (864) 885-3418.
Very t yours, R. . Jnes Site Vice President Attachment xc w/att: Mr. William D. Travers Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth St., SWW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303 L. N. Olshan, Project Manager, Section 1 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 xc(w/o attch):
M. C. Shannon Senior NRC Resident Inspector Oconee Nuclear Station Mr. Henry Porter Division of Radioactive Waste Management Bureau of Land and Waste Management SC Dept. of Health & Environmental Control 2600 Bull St.
Columbia, SC 29201
Request for Relief 04-ON-009 Limited Examinations Associated With Various Systems and Components 2EOC 20
Relief Request 04-ON-009 Page 1 of 8 Inservice Inspection Impracticality Duke Energy Corporation Oconee Nuclear Station - Unit 2 (EOC-20)
Third 10-Year Interval - Inservice Inspection Plan Interval Start Date= 12-16-1994 Interval End Date=9-9-2004 ASME Section XI Code - 1989 Edition with No Addenda I. lII. lIII. l IV. &V. l VI. l VII. l VIll. l Request Limited System / Code Requirement from Impracticality/ Proposed Implementation Justification Number Area/Weld I.D. Component for Which Which Relief is Requested: Burden Caused Alternate Schedule and for Granting Number Relief is Requested: 100% Exam Volume Coverage by Compliance Examinations Duration Relief Area or Weld to be Exam Category or Testing Examined Item No.
Fig. No.
Limitation Percentage
- 1. 2-LDCB- High Pressure Injection Exam Category B-D See Paragraph See See Paragraph See INLET-Vi System Item Number B03.150.003 "A" Paragraph "L" Paragraph Letdown Cooler 2B Fig. IWB-2500-7(a) "K" "M" Inlet Nozzle to Channel 29% Volume Coverage Head Weld Limited Scan of Examination Volume A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I-J
- 2. 2-LDCB- High Pressure Injection Exam Category B-D See Paragraph See See Paragraph See OUTLET-V2 System Item Number B03.150.004 "B" Paragraph "L" Paragraph Letdown Cooler 2B Fig. IWB-2500-7(a) "K" "M" Outlet Nozzle to 29% Volume Coverage Channel Head Weld Limited Scan of Examination Volume A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I-J 3 2HP-215-3 High Pressure Injection Exam Category B-J See Paragraph See See Paragraph See System Item Number B09.011.017 "'C"' Paragraph "L" Paragraph Tee to Reducer Weld Fig. IWB-2500-8(c) "K" "N" (circumferential weld) 88% Volume Coverage Limited Scan of Examination Volume C-D-E-F
Relief Request 04-ON-009 Page 2 of 8 I I. IL. III. IV. & V. VI. VII. Vill.
Request Limited System / Code Requirement from Impracticality/ Proposed Implementation Justification Number Area/Weld I.D. Component for Which Which Relief Is Requested: Burden Caused Alternate Schedule and for Granting Number Relief is Requested: 100% Exam Volume Coverage by Compliance Examinations Duration Relief Area or Weld to be Exam Category or Testing Examined Item No.
Fig. No.
Limitation Percentage
- 4. 2-51A-17-124 High Pressure Injection Exam Category C-F-1 See Paragraph See See Paragraph See System Item Number C05.021.021 "D" Paragraph "L" Paragraph Pipe to Valve 2HP-1 18 Fig. IWC-2500-7(a) "K" .
Weld 34% Volume Coverage K (circumferential weld) Limited Scan of Examination Volume C-D-E-F
- 5. 2-51A-17-92 High Pressure Injection Exam Category C-F-I See Paragraph See See Paragraph See System Item Number C05.021.022 "E" Paragraph "L" Paragraph Valve 2HP-1 15 to Tee Fig. IWC-2500-7(a) "K" lip..
Weld 34% Volume Coverage (circumferential weld) Limited Scan of Examination Volume C-D-E-F
- 6. 2-51A-17-125 High Pressure Injection Exam Category C-F-i See Paragraph See See Paragraph See System Item Number C05.021.023 "F" Paragraph "L" Paragraph Valve 2HP- 118 to Fig. IWC-2500-7(a) "K" 671 Elbow Weld 34% Volume Coverage (circumferential weld) Limited Scan of Examination Volume C-D-E-F
- 7. 2-51A-17-20A High Pressure Injection Exam Category C-F-1 See Paragraph See See Paragraph See System Item Number C05.021.051 "G" Paragraph "L" Paragraph Pipe to Valve 2LP-56 Fig. IWC-2500-7(a) "K" 479 Weld 35% Volume Coverage (circumferential weld) Limited Scan of Examination Volume C-D-E-F _
- 8. 2-51A-17-102 High Pressure Injection Exam Category C-F-i See Paragraph See See Paragraph See System Item Number C05.021.054 "H" Paragraph "L" Paragraph Tee to Pipe Weld Fig. IWC-2500-7(a) "K" li, (circumferential weld) 86% Volume Coverage Limited Scan of Examination Volume C-D-E-F
Relief Request 04-ON-009 Page 3 of 8 I. II. III. IV. & V. VI. VII. VIII.
Request Limited System / Code Requirement from Impracticality/ Proposed Implementation Justification Number Area/Weld I.D. Component for Which Which Relief is Requested: Burden Caused Alternate Schedule and for Granting Number Relief is Requested: 100% Exam Volume Coverage by Compliance Examinations Duration Relief Area or Weld to be Exam Category or Testing Examined Item No.
Fig. No.
Limitation Percentage
- 9. 2HP-227-11 High Pressure Injection Exam Category C-F-1 See Paragraph See See Paragraph See System Item Number C05.021.056 "1 Paragraph "I " Paragraph Elbow to Fig. IWC-2500-7(a) K9 .67 Valve 2HP-1 14 Weld 35% Volume Coverage (circumferential weld) Limited Scan of Examination Volume C-D-E-F
- 10. 2-51A-31-50 High Pressure Injection Exam Category C-F-i See Paragraph See See Paragraph See System Item Number C05.021.058 "J", Paragraph "L" Paragraph Pipe to Valve 2HP-20 Fig. IWC-2500-7(a) K pT, Weld 59% Volume Coverage (circumferential weld) Limited Scan of Examination Volume C-D-E-F See Attachment A for B03.150.003 and B03.150.004 area/weld locations.
See Attachment B for inspection data on all items listed in the above table for this Relief Request.
Note: Items in this relief request were inspected during one of the following months: February, March, or April of 2004.
Relief Request 04-ON-009 Page 4 of 8 IV. & V. Impracticalitv/Burden caused by Code Compliance Paragraph A: (The Letdown Cooler Inlet Nozzle and Channel Head material is SA182 Grade T316L. This weld has a diameter of 3.0 inches and a wall thickness of .875 inches.)
During the ultrasonic examination of the Inlet Nozzle to Channel Head weld, 29% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained for this weld. The percentage of coverage reported represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The coverage from each scan was as follows: 450 scan perpendicular and parallel to the weld covered 28%; 600 scan perpendicular and parallel to the weld covered, 29%. The weld joint geometry, which is essentially a branch connection arrangement using a set-on nozzle, prevented scanning from both sides of the weld. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of these welds, the inlet nozzle would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.
Paragraph B: (The Letdown Cooler Outlet Nozzle and Channel Head material is SA182 Grade T316L. This weld has a diameter of 3.0 inches and a wall thickness of .875 inches.)
During the ultrasonic examination of the Outlet Nozzle to Channel Head weld, 29. % coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The percentage of coverage reported represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The coverage from each scan was as follows: 450 scan perpendicular and parallel to the weld covered 28%; 60° scan perpendicular and parallel to the weld covered 29%.
The weld joint geometry, which is essentially a branch connection arrangement using a set-on nozzle, prevented scanning from both sides of the weld. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of these welds, the outlet nozzle would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.
Paragraph C: (The tee and reducer material is stainless steel. This weld has a diameter of 4.0 inches and a wall thickness of .531 inches.)
During the ultrasonic examination of this weld, 88% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The percentage of coverage represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The 45° shear wave circumferential scans, both clockwise and counter-clockwise covered 100% of the examination volume and the 60° shear wave axial scan covered 88% from two directions. A supplemental 600 refracted longitudinal wave scan covered 100% of the examination volume in one axial direction from the reducer side. The limitation was 4 inches long on the tee side of the weld caused by the throat of the tee. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of this weld, the tee would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.
Paragraph D: (The pipe and valve material is stainless steel. This weld has a diameter of 4.0 inches and a wall thickness of .531 inches.)
During the ultrasonic examination of this weld, 34% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained.
The percentage of coverage represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The 450 shear wave circumferential scans, both clockwise and counter-clockwise covered 50% of the examination volume and the 600 shear wave axial scan covered 34%. A supplemental 600 refracted longitudinal wave scan covered 100% of the examination volume in one axial direction from the pipe side. Limitations were caused by the taper on the valve side of the weld which prevented scanning from that side. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.
Relief Request 04-ON-009 Page 5 of 8 Paragraph E: (The valve and tee material is stainless steel. This weld has a diameter of 4.0 inches and a wall thickness of .531 inches.)
During the ultrasonic examination of this weld, 34% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The percentage of coverage represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The 450 shear wave circumferential scans, both clockwise and counter-clockwise covered 50% of the examination volume and the 60° shear wave axial scan covered 34% of the examination volume from the tee side. A supplemental 600 refracted longitudinal wave scan covered 100% of the examination volume in one axial direction from the tee side. The limitation was caused by the taper on the valve side of the weld which prevented scanning from that side. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.
Paragraph F: (The valve and elbow material is stainless steel. This weld has a diameter of 4.0 inches and a wall thickness of .531 inches.)
During the ultrasonic examination of this weld, 34% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The percentage of coverage represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The 450 shear wave circumferential scans, both clockwise and counter-clockwise covered 50% of the examination volume and the 600 shear wave axial scan covered 34% of the examination volume from the elbow side.
A supplemental 600 refracted longitudinal wave scan covered 100% of the examination volume in one axial direction from the elbow side. The limitation was caused by the taper on the valve side of the weld which prevented scanning from that side. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.
Paragraph G: (The pipe and valve material is stainless steel. This weld has a diameter of 3.0 inches and a wall thickness of .216 inches.)
During the ultrasonic examination of this weld, 35% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The percentage of coverage represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The 450 shear wave circumferential scans, both clockwise and counter-clockwise covered 50% of the examination volume and the 600 shear wave axial scan covered 35%. A supplemental 700 shear wave scan covered 100% of the examination volume in one axial direction from the pipe side. The limitation was caused by the taper on the valve side of the weld which prevented scanning from that side. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.
Paragraph H: (The tee and pipe material is stainless steel. This weld has a diameter of 3.0 inches and a wall thickness of .438 inches.)
During the ultrasonic examination of this weld, 86% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The percentage of coverage represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The 450 shear wave circumferential scans, both clockwise and counter-clockwise covered 100% of the examination volume and the 600 axial scan covered 86%. A supplemental 700 shear wave scan covered 100% of the examination volume in one axial direction from the pipe side. The limitation was 4 inches long on the tee side of the weld caused by the throat of the tee. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of this weld, the tee would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.
Paragraph I: (The elbow and valve material is stainless steel. This weld has a diameter of 3.0 inches and a wall thickness of .438 inches.)
During the ultrasonic examination of this weld, 35% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The percentage of coverage represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The 450 circumferential scans, both clockwise and counter-clockwise covered 50% of the examination volume and the 60 scan covered 35%. A supplemental 700 shear wave scan covered 100% of the examination volume in one axial direction from the elbow side. The limitation was caused by the taper on the valve side of the
Relief Request 04-ON-009 Page 6 of 8 weld which prevented scanning on that side. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.
Paragraph J: (The pipe and valve material is stainless steel. This weld has a diameter of 3.0 inches and a wall thickness of .438 inches.)
During the ultrasonic examination of this weld, 59% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The percentage of coverage represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The 450 shear wave circumferential scans, both clockwise and counter-clockwise covered 50% of the examination volume and the 60° shear wave axial scan covered 35%. A supplemental 700 shear wave scan covered 100% of the examination volume in one axial direction from the pipe side. The limitation was caused by the taper on the valve side of the weld which prevented scanning from that side. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.
VI. Proposed Alternate Examinations or Testing Paragraph K:
The scheduled 10-year code examination was performed on the referenced area/weld and it resulted in the noted limited coverage of the required ultrasonic volume. These inspections were performed during the last inspection outage of the interval; no additional examinations are planned for the area/weld during the current inspection interval.
VII Implementation Schedule and Duration Paragraph L The scheduled third 10-year interval plan code examination was performed on the referenced areas/welds resulting in limited scan and volumetric coverage. No additional examinations are planned for the areas/welds during the current inspection interval. The same areas/welds may be examined again as part of the next (fourth) 10-year interval plan, depending on the applicable code year edition and addenda requirements adopted in the future.
VIII. Justification for Grantine Relief Paragraph M:
Ultrasonic examination of areas/welds for item number B03.150 were conducted using personnel, qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VII of the 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda. The ultrasonic procedures used complied with the requirements of ASME Section V, Article 4, 1989 Edition with no addenda.
Although 100% coverage of the examination volume could not be achieved, the amount of coverage obtained for this examination provides an acceptable level of quality and integrity. (See Paragraph 0 for additional justification.)
Paragraph N:
Ultrasonic examination of area/weld for item number B09.011 was conducted using personnel, equipment and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII Supplement 2 of the 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as administered by the Performance Demonstration Initiative (PDI). Although 100% of the required scanning could not be achieved, the amount of coverage of the examination volume obtained for this weld provides an acceptable level of quality and integrity. In addition to the volumetric examination with limited coverage, Duke Energy performed a surface examination (code required) on the B09.011 item and achieved 100%
coverage. The result of the surface examination was acceptable. (See Paragraph 0 for additional justification.)
Duke Energy Corporation does not claim credit for coverage of the far side of austenitic welds when access is limited to one side only. The characteristics of austenitic weld metal attenuate and distort the sound beam when shear waves pass through the weld. Refracted longitudinal waves provide better penetration but cannot be used beyond the first sound path leg. Duke Energy Corporation uses a combination of shear waves and longitudinal waves to examine
Relief Request 04-ON-009 Page 7 of 8 single sided austenitic welds when the nominal material thickness exceeds 0.5 inch. A 60° refracted longitudinal wave is used to interrogate the far side of the weld when the nominal material thickness is greater than 0.5 inch.
The procedures, personnel and equipment have been qualified through the PDI. However, although 600 longitudinal wave search units and 700 shear wave search units were used in the qualification and cracks were detected through the weld metal, PDI does not provide a qualification for single sided examination of similar metal austenitic piping welds.
Paragraph 0:
Duke Energy will use Class 1, Examination Category B-P, pressure testing and VT-2 visual examination to compliment the limited scan examinations. The Code requires that a pressure test be performed after each refueling outage for Class 1. These tests require a VT-2 visual examination for evidence of leakage. This testing provides adequate assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), there are other activities which provide a high level of confidence that, in the unlikely event that leakage did occur through these welds, it would be detected and isolated. Specifically, leakage from these welds would be detected by monitoring of the Reactor Coolant System (RCS), which is performed once each shift under procedure PT/2/A/0600/10, "RCS Leakage". This RCS leakage monitoring is a requirement of Technical Specification 3.4.13, "Reactor Coolant System Leakage".
Any leakage is also evaluated in accordance with this Technical Specification. The leakage could also be detected through several other methods. One is the RCS mass balance calculation. A second is the Reactor Building air particulate monitor. This monitor is sensitive to low leak rates; the iodine monitor, gaseous monitor and area monitor are capable of detecting any fission products in the coolant and will make these monitors sensitive to coolant leakage. A third is the level indicator in the Reactor Building normal sump. A fourth is a loss of level in the Letdown Storage Tank. Based on the results of the required volumetric, surface and VT-2 examinations performed during this outage, it's Duke's belief that this combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of component integrity.
Paragraph P:
Ultrasonic examination of areas/welds for the item numbers C05.021 were conducted using personnel, equipment and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section A, Appendix vm Supplement 2 of the 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as administered by the PDI. Although 100% coverage of the examination volume could not be achieved, the amount of coverage obtained for each of these welds provides an acceptable level of quality and integrity. In addition to the volumetric examinations with limited coverage, Duke Energy performed a surface examination (code required) on each of the C05.021 items and achieved 100% coverage. The results from the surface examinations were acceptable.
In addition to the C05.021 welds that relief is being requested for limited scanning, there were 11 additional C05.021 welds that surface and volumetric examinations were performed on. The examinations didn't identify any recordable indications and 100% coverage was obtained on each of the 11 welds. The 11 additional welds were from the same system as the C05.021 welds of this request.
Duke Energy Corporation does not claim credit for coverage of the far side of austenitic welds. The characteristics of austenitic weld metal attenuate and distort the sound beam when shear waves pass through the weld. Refracted longitudinal waves provide better penetration but cannot be used beyond the first path leg. Duke Energy Corporation uses a combination of shear waves and longitudinal waves to examine single sided austenitic welds when the nominal material thickness exceeds 0.5 inch. A 700 shear wave angle beam is used to interrogate the far side of the weld when the nominal material thickness is equal to or less than 0.5 inch and a 600 refracted longitudinal wave is used to interrogate the far side of the weld when the nominal material thickness is greater than 0.5 inch.
Duke Energy will use Class 2, Examination Category C-H, pressure testing and VT-2 visual examination to compliment the limited examination coverage. The Code requires that a pressure test be performed once each period for Class 2 items. These tests require a VT-2 visual examination for evidence of leakage. This testing provides adequate assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
Relief Request 04-ON-009 Page 8 of 8 In addition to the above Code required examinations (surface and pressure test), there are other activities which provide a high level of confidence that, in the unlikely case that leakage did occur through these welds, it would be detected and isolated. One is that leakage from these welds would be detected by Operations personnel during their regular rounds (reference procedure OP/2/A/1 102/020A Primary Rounds"). The Nuclear Equipment Operator has been trained to look for any unusual conditions, such as leaks. In addition, the procedure addresses leaks as being an item to consider during rounds. The C05.021 items in this request are located in an area where operations personnel will be walking through as part of their rounds; therefore, any leak would be identified by visual observation. This paragraph is applicable to all C05.021 items (except for C05.021.058) which are located in the aux building (HPI room).
Item C05.021.058 is located in the reactor building and the additional measures listed in the second paragraph of Paragraph 0 would be applicable for this item.
Duke Energy has examined the welds/components referenced in this request to the maximum extent possible utilizing the latest in examination techniques and equipment. The welds/components identified in Section II of this request were rigorously inspected by volumetric NDE methods during construction and verified to be free from unacceptable fabrication defects. Based on the coverage and results of the required volumetric exams and surface exams this outage and the pressure testing (VT-2) exams, it is Duke's belief that this combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of component integrity.
IX. Other Information The following individuals contributed to the development of this relief request:
James J. McArdle (Principal UT NDE Level m Inspector) provided Sections III., IV., V. and part of Section VyI.
B. W. Carney, Jr. (Oconee Engineering) provided part of Section VIII.
Larry C. Keith (Oconee ISI Plan Manager) compiled the remaining sections.
Sponsored By: X. (o , Date ___ __6__ _ _
Approved By: 1 . ,/, 1 Date _ _______
A1 -T~ci meVT A-- -
a -.-. - .--.- I
- 1 f mm(i)AlaA 0 M & 1W ADOM at(I
- . ZO U.9~ ~ L V b1 ' - -
15 k, 4 ~ ' k 13,.1 , FOi
- PJP4I
'P pi'h j
- L) ~ d);IJA kWj L tt.W kA$.& f roP,
- tL.j~j '3 t1iL$1ICAL (L CN F-V ~
L1~~ _ _ _ _
, 0 *J.I , I
. .1 I .
- -.. I. I ., -lit ..
'I t6- .:.-A , -ri - -
-,i,
.. -. '71
.- 'd '.
I .. .1 I;I I II I II___II
______II__H
.o! -
17 I
I I
1f71 J#
i
~i~A I . I 118 4 wo Iv
-iA/ 5 , 4 f,; 5 '
MOWIT NO.
1.
_____ PAh. T fr, ri ti A obi* r (V5 AAi C2 4 t,_ 't)M kexp+/--_' fl. W o i C04o ' F It4y~ja'f 61j' 692 n +/->7
________________________Nh 1
. .. I ... I .. , ..., . . . .
I
Attachment B Page I of 75 0 Dke AUT Vessel Examination
- 0000 Site/Unit
- Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-630 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: B03.150.003 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-04-152 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98603899 Page: 1 of 2 Code: Asme Section Xl 1989 Cat./Item: B-D-/B3.150.3 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 1-34097-2
Description:
Nozzle to Channel Body System ID: 51A Component ID: B03.150.003 /2-LDCB-INLET-V1 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter 0.875"/3.0" Limitations: Yes- See attached limitation report. Start Time: 0854 Finish Time: 0950 Examination Surface: Inside E Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.2.2 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 03125 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE32768 Surface Temp.: 59 -F Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-242, CAL-04-243, CAL-04-244, CAL-04-245 Angle Used 0 45 45T I 60RLI 60T l 45RL Scanning dB 40.5 l40.5 l 63.5 66.5 Indication(s): Yes 2 No i Scan Coverage: Upstream v DownstreamE CWW CCWM Comments:
FC 99-02, 03-17, 03-30 Results Accept i Reject ° Info ] Scanning db's less than ref.+14 to abtain 2:1 signal to noise ratio.
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: No
- 29.26% Reviewed Previous Data: Yes Examiner Level l Signature. Date Reviewer i re Date Zimmerman, David K. - 4/5/2004 Z4Aj -bL 4L9l IAd Examiner Level II Signat e Date Site Review Signature Date Mauldin, Larry E. 4/5/2004r Other Level Signature Date ANII Re~jv Signature Date
Attachment B Determination of Percent Coverage for Page a. of 7 5 jk. y UT Examinations - Vessels Site/Unit: Oconee I 2 Procedure: NDE-630 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: B03.150.003 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-04-152 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98603899 Page: 2 of 2 o deg Planar Scan % Length X % volume of length 1 100 = % total for 0 deg 45 deg Scan 1 100.000 % Length X 35.900 % volume of length / 100 = 35.900 Y. total for Scan 1 Scan 2 100.000 % Length X 15.600 % volume of length / 100 = 15.600 % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000 % Length X 31.400 % volume of length /100 = 31.400 % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 31.400 % volume of length / 100 = 31.400 % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = 28.575 % total for 45 deg Other deg 60 Scan 1 100.000 % Length X 46.600 % volume of length / 100 = 46.600 % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 100.000 % Length X 10.400 % volume of length /100 = 10.400 % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000 % Length X 31.400 % volume of length /1 00 = 31.400 % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 31.400 % volume of length / 100 = 31.400 % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = 29.950 % total for 60 deg Percent complete coverage Add totals for each angle and scan required and divide by # of angles to determine; 29.263 % Total for complete exam Note:
Supplemental coverage may be achieved by use of other angles / methods. When used, the coverage for volume not obtained with angles as noted above shall be calculated and added to the total to provide the percent total for the complete examination.
Site Field Supervisor: Date: 4/qt,Ioq 141,31 i
Attachment B Page 3 'of 75 DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID: 2-LDCB-INLET-Vl Item No: B03.150.003 remarks:
E NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Due to branch connection E LIMITED SCAN E 1 Z 2 Z 1 E 2 Z cw Z ccw configuration.
FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO .5" to Beyond ANGLE: E 0 Z 45 Z 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG E NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION ElLIMITED SCAN El 1 El 2 Eli El2E cw l ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE:' E 0 El 45 El 60 other FROM DEG to DEG E NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION ElLIMITED SCAN E 1 El2 El 1 2E cw l cow FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: [3 0 El 45 El 60 other FROM DEG to DEG E NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION ElLIMITED SCAN El1 El2 Eli E l Ecw:lccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached 0 El 45 El 60 other FROM DEG to DEG 3 yes a No ANGLE: a Prepared By: Level: Date: 40/ Sheet i... of Reviewed By: Date: L , at e. vAhorzednpcr IL.1. I I F Dfgen.WXs
\)r1S zo o
Attachment B Page LA of 75 Supplem zal Report Report No.: U cC - I5 Z bnewgY Summary No.: n3 .5nO. OCe 3 Examiner: &Z//z 5 Level: _ _ Reviewer: Date:
_e_ _
Examiner: Level: Site Review: Date:
Other: Level: ANII Review: a az:% Date: qf//zl y~
U Comments: AuJePAct: oF E2ALx A'E.< oF AMIgI /Uu/L. LOuI-ouEl.5 ui5D T1L) DT)A6fZmU ALt-UL U AL1-L\A AIZC-ZL.
Sketch or Photo:
C~~~a~~k YA \A X?3t.eZ-a 77$ -' 5. 5o A/t- =, 7-54 i C-1. A, I f t-or. A12o &f -: )4- ( A-Vq16,,-- ),L N.Mn
. g . ).l?4e J- v .. Yt _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- _. _*
-5 LI 3 8.; 2 __ ,_ __ __ __ _
_ 2 q.z ,.L@tt~k . . -_ _ e .
_ , 2 9 ,, ______________________
Li - 11? --,< ;; .G
- 2. i-
,,_ _I~t __ , _ _ _ L424s 4 o .~Zi 1i 1 - L l 7? l Q4-.1I2j I I -- 1 . Li% -
2- LDCL -IULEff\VI.
Attachment B Page 5* of 75 Supplemc..al Report twobiwo. Repon¶No.: 0--0 Z t: Pae 3 of LL Summary No.: :Bo---
-Is Examiner:
Examiner: _
/ZAct /g. Level: Reviewer~ al= 7, Date: 40ql >
Level: Site Review:
Other: 1 Y - - L Date:
Level: ANII Review.
L~4i2,?Ua: Date: ://z/6~/
Comments:
IN.
-?
Sketch or Ph.oto: ) IAI.
PIZ' "V/,.
E - -- 0z1 . Z I,.
C-IH F- Z /,q "X .7S" G __-H Z. - . 71Z 5Z/y,
.: .3 75 , /R.
2 .43 /Z V:
A I
! l c
e<~vI"AL. 65rm4i ee? 3. '-(3 t'/N 2 - LODCe -N~ LET - /
Attachment B Page 6 of75 lwko Supplem- cal Report rtJ f 4-A~pdN.: - ~ of - '1 Summary No.: 00-5 Examiner Examk-ver 0(
--::7- -
Level:
Level:
Reylwer Site Review.
a 77 0 Date:
Date:
A A
Other- Level: ANII Rlev1ew- X4 2!Z C 22 Date: wu?/rao u
Comments: 2-L-LDLI3 -Lt4Lr*-<\i A-hem, c ,.rtl Sketch or Photo:
I2-A 8 l18 ( __
I'
-LI'5' 2~~ - 5 A I F(jo L4.. jv1MA6 .
Attachment B Page 7 of 7 5 Supplem,....tal Report 1t1plj~ ReportNo.: -<
LC Z
^ . 2I I a Itt 4- A VIf M" Summary No.: ?Fon -- , *IO:;6 03 Examinern Examiner:
Level -`
Level: Site Review: II Date:
Date:
M4S.LI Other Level: ANI Aevlew . J$CS e Date: ___o _
(-
Comments: 2- LDLSfC..lLf -V1 ARe- L- - CCDOfv-Sketch or Photo:
FqIRt-*4 Qr- !eveZ&Qx
-,S. 35.,V_ .)73.- 5 LZ5 Pkq A - ,i4L FJ LL Covclw PJU COvumAA
Attachment B Page 8 of 75 ft tko Supplem.stal Report FReportNo.: UiOC'4- IZ I
--ja
- I P441-mkin~eAn s`9 . LO - or Summary No.: IT~O 3. I SO.Co -,
Examiner: Level- - RaWve~wr Date: XLL.Q Examiner: Level: Site Review VII Date:
Other: Lvel: ANti Rovlew, 4L-~ Date: 2jlY 6Il Comments: I LZU - -L-QL4 ~-V/I - 12,X tA t-A lZer-A cg-' e, Sketc or Photo:
arle-r5 11( 1,qsb. I-+ u:'. -) 2s"%,-, . SAS"L.t.
7- L) lf)77-i&l-L
<'6 I lz (A - lztz-A 1 N.Asa I
(-, 0 Q1tkIAL - '~CA&. I Fuc " ONCPa
Attachment B Page 7 of 75
- n0 Supplem, tal Report Report No.: L)TOL - 'Sz I lq~chync48 pe7 a )q Sumnwaey No.: 1303. I'S o,0n Exsmner. Lt~t. Level. Reviewer: zlrc:-- Date: -L lIlOH Examnker Site seview. Date:
7 -
Other .
Le"l: ANII Ryelew. bt,2::, ( ') ,
te Date: _/___
Ctnments: -LnC&
2 _tUE 1--/_VI At!y (e L' C--,v. rex Sketch7 or Photo: f l'R A' OP >\t.
GO/ AYA(- -CAI ru " Ce-(Xn6w I==
"GO C-4-tA
Attachment B Page IO of 75
,%kO Suppler ital Report npo.: Nor-o: sz
'Jewpy H 44-cic .hrnC4 ;mo5 i -a Suffnay No.: 13 n-' Iin, on s Exan**nr PwReivier: Date:4
-na-r w 5 Level: i j I Examnenr: Site RevlwA~ I Daiv: _ _ _ _ _
Level:
Other: _
A) itI g AA A i. e- ~~ Date:
Commn"ts: fled, &SCZ.-A k&-4 d ABv5-b.-.:
Skcetch~orPhoto:
,Ff-, 1 b: 4C f1-,2qC /n.
C-4-Lt % qi1, x-'~1, r, .081 I Wo T-: -Jim,*i 6 o 6 C ar. CCw4/k 1ZENIm(.4L. A e'7)S.
Fu " ,i -- w - -
2-- LDC 9 - I MLL-f - V I VJQ C.4tm#(I6
Attachment B Page -/ of 75 4^ rk Supplem al Report ReportNo.: JTl_0Lt. ^IZ.
kL.owY 1tLL.__L P4 ,- of.- 1Lj
,I _
nr_%V(cnMqnz --
Summary No.: 1~)C)3 - 0-c Examiner: Level: - Reviewer L) I__. Date: L,¢ Examiner: Level: Site Review. Date:
Other:
Level: ANII Review J1 I4Mt'Date: /
Comments:
't' Y' M An : P :b- Sb X ta1~" : 35, LT-)E : .Is' X .3S - .70-m b&'I L.S' X.7"1 Sketch or Photo:
E r-G z r- .,H z- ,3 'X .77 4 I
/t3"X7-' .35E 1I..
GHI T-^
6 xA Yy 4w: 2.072/m.
Z - LDc'->- ;QLEI \ /;
Attachment B Page 12 of 75 W uko Supplem -ital Report low- FleeoMNo.: UT. 04 -I -
A 4+oe.Jnrzr4 7 : .--P*~o; .10oK°,LY Sumnary No.: _ _C c1c0 E~xam'iner: -z~i2 7;, ik ;,. La"e Reviewer. Date:
Examiner: ____________________ La"e 1.
Date:
Site Rlevew:
Other __ _ _ _ Lovol I: Date: %/,g ANII Review: -___
_Da.e:
Comments:
-C/ PC-. t-')
Sketch or Photo: - Age--p nr-A 3c2D'. p CT
'CAS, O 7 *z lllg 4 - tx.A ") I FU LL COVEMAc~
Czsxw Ic oArt
Attachment B Page )j of 75 Suppler-intal Report LkPey , _t4o.:' L-, 185 A I +aRiretv4-: ;9 f . UI I -O -H SutmryNo.: -lI- c).-Co3 Le%:: -,
(>
Exanef*r sRte Revew Date:
Otfher:
Level:
ANII neview.
'-l-" Date: YZ6 Comments: 2- LOc- - IrJ C- r - x/ C IV¢(, C r-8<V f;Zr3 e-Sketch or Photo: ^ - ~4 -~
-Rc SC L
.;' :.2751 I C- A til;- M t t , ,
-TOc:o b " -.11 ,4 A-e,:-:A -.
Lie-r / A~v I A' t- - -:RLL 4
Co44LeRnCk r
%1o CtR
Attachment B Page / j of 75 t^ Duko Supplen- ital Report RPort No.: \s 0 law- Owl - v SZ Summary No.: Acvo .i-S,. -cc03 Examiner: Reaiwr: -j, Date:
Level:-
Examiner: Site Review: Date:
Other: _ _
Level: ANII Review: c!: 'bAr o - Date: ____
Comm~ents: Z - L ID(-E ,- -- r-\/I la RF-A C-)(- C az&:ML.
Sketch or Photo:
-n,", 9 -.1;1, . f-AjLC -, -L 7- - . 0--5 tt-I
-LUQ ,', ---<--, . 1.
[A CD 11 - I --- -= -.i I--
I__ _ _ _ _ _ __1
- f _ I % . 1 t I W'k ~glg$,t .
________If.
CoO" PYvi&- ~OI. 1"tJ-L C~ON'4-RnC&
o ~ w\C'ACrt
Attachment B Page )ISof 7 5
^ DC&8 Supplerr ital Report at XfW Repord No.:
.,r O
% r 2 15Z
- I StI fl*Cchrer4: --o - L2, Of I;ui Surmiay No.:
Examinr
-62R n ,, . )--
Reviewer Date:
Examiner: Level: Shte Review b9l' (=,lto IOZL1 Date:
Other Level: ANtI RevIew tV7 Date: 11117le Comlents: ZL . c/
<.I rZC.- ( n c3-roLrR Sketch or Photo:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - *2 BCD I.5 14 go<Pt~~~~~ (_t2,W ,2
-A - -I V-
&n
° A V 'A IA - S A Z-rULL COV6KRACa I io OVCx
Attachment B Page /i of 75 LOo ulke Suppler- vntal Report ReonNo.: ol Lk z legV I Mi~achkerv: ' - - o Summary No.: rx>O 3, IE~)O 00C)3 . .
Examiner z2e,2#- 2~ Level: -- ' Reviewer: Date: L(
Examiner: -
Level: Site Rew4ew. r ,,
Date:
Other Level: ANII Review: ,q zC a Date: 1//Z4.
'IJ Comnents: 62 hk)lw oIC-OV,5Pa6: 1-)6eb -I 1-1(.4151t-i-.3 I'):
Z , -q )ZS"--/w Sketgc or Photo: ClDel axis" t-
.L 43 5 t IM,-; h/4ZrAI C- OVE PA (-6 do .WS,- ~O ' C,@'. 6&!4 /s r QVd~
F'ULL.. COVtE&ACE4:
%lo coeARC r61E 2- - L-D (-I> - d LF-'f - V
Attachment B Page 17 of 75 Him UT Vessel Examination Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-630 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: B03.150.004 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-04-153 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98603899 Page: 1 of 2 Code: Asme Section XI 1989 Cat./Item: B-D-/B3.150.4 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 1-34097-2
Description:
Nozzle to Channel Body System ID: 51A Component ID: B03.150.004 /2-LDCB-OUTLET-V2 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: 0.875"/3.0" Limitations: Yes. See attached limitation report. Start Time: 0854 Finish Time: 0950 Examination Surface: Inside - Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.2.2 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 03125 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE32768 Surface Temp.: 59 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-242, CAL-04-243, CAL-04-244, CAL-04-245 Angle Used 0 45 45T 60RL 60T 45RL Scanning dB 40.5 40.5 63.5 66.5 Indication(s): Yes 7] No i Scan Coverage: Upstream0 DownstreamE CW CCW Comments:
FC 99-02, 03-17, 03-30 Results: Accept [.3 Reject E Info E Scanning db's less than ref.+14 to obtain 2:1 signal to noise ratio.
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: No-29.26% Reviewed Previous Data: Yes Examiner Level II Signature _ Date Reviewer ture Date Zimmerman, David K. / 4/5/2004 3Io Examiner Level II siur Sia Date Site Review Signature Date Mauldin, Larry E. 4/5/2004 Other Level 9 Signature Date ANIRview ; ' Signature Date
Attachment B Page J8 of 75 ODuke Determination of Percent Coverage for rovEnergjy. UT Examinations - Vessels Site/Unit: Oconee I 2 Procedure: NDE-630 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: B03.150.004 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-04-153 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98603899 Page: 2 of 2 0 deg Planar Scan % Length X % volume of length / 100 = % total for 0 deg 45 deq Scan 1 100.000 % Length X 35.900 % volume of length / 100 = 35.900 % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 100.000 % Length X 15.600 % volume of length / 100 = 15.600 % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000 _% Length X 31.400 _ % volume of length/ 1 00 = 31.400 % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 31.400 % volume of length / 100 = 31.400 % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = 28.575 % total for 45 deg Other degt 60 Scan 1 100.000 % Length X 46.600 % volume of length / 100 = 46.600 Y. total for Scan 1 Scan 2 100.000 % Length X 10.400 -% volume of length /100 = 10.400 _ %0 total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000 % Length X 31.400 % volume of length / 100 = 31.400 V. total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 31.400 % volume of length / 100 = 31.400 % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = 29.950 % total for 60 deg Percent complete coverage Add totals for each angle and scan required and divide by # of angles to determine; 29.263 0%ITotal for complete exam Note:
Supplemental coverage may be achieved by use of other angles I methods. When used, the coverage for volume not obtained with angles as noted above shall be calculated and added to the total to provide the percent total for the complete examination.
Site Field Supervisor: cil Date: _ _ __>_/
LI I k1
Attachment B Page 1i of 75 DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID: 2-LDCB-OUTLET-V2 Item No: B03.150.004 remarks:
Z NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Due to branch connection L LIMITED SCAN L 1 2 2 E 1 L 2 0 cw Z ccw configuration.
FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO .5" to Beyond ANGLE: L 0 Z 45 Z 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG L NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION l LIMITED SCAN El 1 02 2 0 E 2 2cw ccw I_________
FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: aI 0 LI 45 I 60 other FROM DEG to DEG L NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION I LIMITED SCAN F 1 2 2 2Diilcw i ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: L 0 L 45 L 60 other FROM DEG to DEG L NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION LIMITED SCAN 1 2 1 22 cwc F ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached ANGLE: aI 0 LI 45 LI 60 other FROM DEG to DEG l yes I LIaNo Prepared By: Larry ldim Level: Date: 4/05/04 Sheet of Reviewed By: Date: Au hrizeInectpr: _ / Date:
(V 1W-1~4 v DX/7L<Q.2 p
qDtloQ' _ Qb.41k
', f-17y-S " I m k S 47nd narce %6OHj -M 153-
Attachment B Page a of 75
_L. ier Supplem 'al Report Report No.: L- OLA - 1s '5 ranew.
-:.-ae: Z Of I Summary No.:
1,-r 3-! -IZ cnc t
- - r, Examiner:
f /-X owS fl Level: Reviewer:
It)tg2 t L.L Date: -k~q Examiner: Level: _ Site Review: Date:
Other: Level: ANII Review: ;Q v S Date: ______
U; Comments: AV ¶R-A&LE (, or F-P AS. Ai-(OLA L 0lJ lZ/CA-C LuISD lb D&(tRNM U\
\ (LtUAL. tV-lX\A AVt . I Sketch or Photo:
flc~tIAt gt i'77th Ag:. L ~ Y) 5.gK, -(Z) c:_q.rU o77, Z(A 5- _EI&S
.7 54;_
AV.t AI A 0 1 riir Atv&A -1,:Pe = ,4-1 ( kvq,,, )14 %inn 0 1 /'le- - 1 041 t .<1; t 8;2_ i 0
- ,I?~ q___,Q ,W __ ._ 8 5 _ t. '
.L .. , u .,, - Z _
l _ . _ __ _ _ _ ___ ___ __ ___ __ . -<ql. 4 %;I5
- q. L4 q-t'1 LU ? 5R .-:, I *X,I,I.t4
, tsL%/
o t L g.- oufcl £-- \/?
Attachment B Page )l of 75 Supplem, IaM Report Report No.\" ..Oq s-~3
-. 2A4'A. 2.1 nt, I LI I t
%t - ' "
vbrugy- A..
Mtto~he Summary No.: I in- on Date: t OAL1-Level: -- Reviewer.
Examiner: , D ate: _ _ _
Level: Site Review:
!- Date: -//)216 Examiner: .
ANII Review: 1UA"X&4:
Level: U Other: .
p Comments:
Sketch or Ph,
-- ,. 0 9S8 . I -- -
X o-,,
G --
S.3 I C--~ 75 I
. i- , I e<"v"<AL 6,rA M 4 k&-4 ':; 3. 'q S '/,V, 2..- L DC-QLL10U-LEI'-VL~
Attachment B Page A2of 75'
~Wko Supplemi Sal Report 116portNo.: 0-T-Ot 4 -=L-3 obli M'TT-u- 1 4 it IG I It, -.
4a09L 4-of I l'
Summary No.: -3,0 2 I S2-0 0 4 Examiner: Level ., Reviewer: Date: °
,/Z_ zz Examiner: Level: Site Review: Date:
V 0 ANII Review:
Other Level: z2LkV -..d Date: /g4 Cormeifls: Z. - LDCX E,-ou T,-r - \1L YI2AIn ro-oLI Sketch or Photo:
A~e 05 c-t6 o -
.1 Y<O<ALt/vA ? ~A 7 Fu LL C-ON.Rr0fl L4$ "A-ZC1= -L SA 2 K I Pja C-6Jt~4wE
Attachment B PageQ3 of 75 le^ Supplem. Sal Report Repod No.: 7 -i - 0D - i$,-3 lldkftlwy
- of:1 ~L4 Summary No.: r" 2L O iSC)A Examiner: 4L2ad4 Level: a_ Revlewer: Date:
- 4 Examiner -
Level: Site RevIew: Date: i Other Level: ANII Revlew: 6 mhe.4,":
- Date: 9-I z Comments: 2L-LDC-5~-0u~-t.~.r - \/ ?-
,4)eA L- c-oo-iovy-Sketch or Pholo:
Alzt;58 &2r I-s. 4. . 's .
-Z A?5;.:C I'.-% -I- - - - -) - - 4 41ZIK-P.
Lb4 0 IA f: - 07 FQ" C.0owjsi ='
fiJO C-O'Jtc I
Attachment B PageA5Lof 7 5 Supplem_.tal Report L^
- Nopot No.: r- 04 -i -S3 A40r.6nA. 90; J of jLL.
Summary No.: Boa.
s :in o .o4 Examiner Level: Reovkwer 0 Date: _qOate:
Examiner: Level: Site Review ._ , -, Date: _
00er Leve?: ANII Review A)An!-- L/TC Date: _______
Comments: 2.- LID C(JS - 0xzeLf - t1 L -AV A ( (. e FIZ C=E~iG Sketch or Photo:
_151 hV ' \ _ B ._.M,^ . _l f _Ir
(.';, It') 855;d ,7 j.
-~~~~~~ l/I 4 l zA 0
(k0 - iA I - (i A I FUL.L r->CO%.Z1je NIQ CJOtmp/
Attachment B Page Qof 7 5 Supplem. .Aal Report leow a ReportNo.: T.-Ott-c 15$3 Au44-m IC -7 °of Sufmmary No.: ?03. IO. Q-Q Exatiner -
Level: - Reviwer: Date: L oq
,4v1-Pxamkwr Level: Site Review: Date: t OtheM. -
Level: ANII Reyevhw A j= Q-rlT H Dale: Z//-z La1 Commfents: 2 - L DC- -oCti-L -'J L Sketch or Photo: GALfrA Or- C,-),CACz IU..t. "
6() P-AfL -'>CAd Z-ruLL. ch>lzar uJc CjOva ME=
Attachment B Page 46 of 75 IW *0 Supplem lal Report Ropor No.: - 0- ^ i- 3 OL.*O.
fl~iy 7 ,c 4- .~ ^ or Sumnaty No.: F~e-,. in. poo , .
Examiner: S,;0n r 4 Level: -- Revlewer: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D ate:_____76 Exanmner Level: Ste Review: 0 I Date:
Other Level: ANtI Revlew / vJ4- CL A) Date:
Comments:
2 lee, fLs; O4A M-40*
/)&v ~ ZV4FU6-6 0 AB Cb-. 87S5"x. 1" .0875 f-,.j Sketch o( Photo: ,=FS 14 6-h o"X.7" -; /./12 t' ,I I . 2 qI. CovRu C-I H 1 -,'X "). 4 .08 o a C- Illy do f-g -,qso i o6 C /tv. (c-Ps CUEQ /7 PNiC/(VJL A e6S, 2- -LDC)LB- OU<L-E -V2 Fu La- COkx ra rIJO C-4%jtM0E -
Attachment B Page ; 7of 75 Ir -ke Supplemi al Report
?0r--'rg. Repon No.: Or- OL( . A5 3 I A*Pro Mruz< 9 of _
Summary No.:
T;10 ?- .IC; )
Examiner: >°,2:; - Level: 12f_ Revlewer Date: L(
Examiner: Level: Site Review: Date:
6?
Other: Level: ANII Review. ,4 M:17 Date: q11Z1W Comments:
,- YA M Aa: 1J:cty:. ."X .a75" -. 431521,q.
cDELI) ~= :-
Sketch or Photo: /,qA/ x.Ztt
/3X.7" r- Gn-X - .15*7IA.
7.-
r O AXA , /o)~ kO X 2.0 7 ,/ .
- Z- L DC i> - Ou~LSr< - j?
Attachment B Supplemnntal Report Page.48 of 75' R""o.:
I Q~aPage er 8 r>-3 of 75t SUMIay No.: ___ _, *0 oez4 _4Qa aof t "er4: I-4_- _ _i Examiner z2',
Examiner Level: --- Revhwer:
- Level: Slte Review:
Other:
Level: ANtI Review:
- JA~~Date:___ Date: ________ -_
Comiments: 2 -LtCp - .LM- \d2 CQRnC. cO.urjj9-Q Sketch or Photo:
- 1Z'Re_'0 nr-A zIL Cr AAit4 I<o17A -
gg aeAL - t'AJ- t FULL COVERAce I =
Q0 Cj."JRAC Io ACt
I Attachment B Page A? ofr75 Supplerr 'tal Report Pk rktk Repon No.: 0r-OL-zJ5 r,+acel.-Zi; 11 ot 1L Summaty No.: S3Q5. ICZQ.(f--)
Examiner &,,Y__-:~ Level -v Re~vwer Date:
Examwer: Level: Site Ravlew.
Other Ie (t,4 ~Date:
- Level: ANII Review: Date:~
Comments: 2 - L OCB - ( U - \12- c, - c >.~r Sketch o( Photo:
EC..
C- A st)C t*L I ;,
<o<AL a* - ik-L46 O /qc, ,Ln - 5 ??
FuLt C..'4et5RnC ti O Cvo-A - 0E
Attachment B Page ?o of 75
_^Pk Supplerr ital Report at VW~ Reort No.: Or- L- 1 3 A.. I , - ,-' M I U IH~acchrvner: - I[- I- I -W Summary No.: Pie- Be \0 .
Ht-ac-hnvizrt Examiner ReVIwer: Date:
A,,0t -
Examirser ..
Level: Slte RevleW Date:
Al0t1~
oe0r . .
Level: ANII Review, Date:
Comemants: Z - LT)c-- oQaL* -\ \Z C IC .no <6. gR Sketch or Photo:
Q .c.. .L5. :. -r AI 1¢LhIKX ,So -,
{# # 15 (, 2...>
- -7AL- AJ i I II(
GOoo flv IQ - Sc I1 FULL Co(/l4RC~e __-
'Jo covRACrt5
Attachment B Page3f of 75 L^ Supplerr - -italReport or Puke VW ReorotiNo.: 07T-QN -I<
r~,e4 ~9~J J!ZL r4aAc Summary No.:
Examiner 2 I,'(i :;i 1Al Ravlewor.' Date:
Examiner Site Revew.
. _ _ _ _ Date:
Other Level: _ _ _ _ _
ANII Review ~' daL2d
- 4 1,Xt Date
- 42 /10,eY Comme~ts: 2 z Z-0UIL-<-VZ (iTEC- (e)0i1OufR Sketch or Photo:
?. -,it;o- b.
2 . Z 6,) A Vei/ LU - A~
AC Z-ULL. C0VEKACXCtCE o C-)CRCzt
~
Atutanniefl IS Page 3A of 75 PkRtko Supplerr 'tal Report AonrNo.: UT-OL _-I- 3 aSy
.. .I jac44nen ..-.. .
Summary No.: aaOs 60o.00L4 Examiner A,, r,C- Rev4ewer: * , Date: Li44O1 Examniner: Examner _ _e Level: Slte RevhIw _
i V
tiyA
" C2S7 A Date: _ _ _
Lvvl: ANtI Re1ew
- _ 4 -[fg t- Date:
Commeuns: f I w.
dLh4 IvA hke do7CVl&p-6: a -1I-
/0/ (.415 I I . q1t I ' ~tN.
Sketch or Photo: -- I> NX SI
. 0o&sZ22I5.
.Lf 3 $ 5 IrN . .4L/4;7g C- (- U5U A/, Vs $ 60 C ,ee. 6SQsUs CoV6ER / 2)eAJT /(°A6 A L6S.
F'uLL COIARACAI SJo CvRH
-- LD CB - OLIfLE *-- V2
Attachment B Page 33 of 75
.,*614k UT Base Met. Lamination Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-640 Outage No.: ONS2EOb20 Summary No.. B09.011.017 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-04-108 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98604011 Page: 1 of _ 2 Code: Asme Section XI 1989 Cat./Item: B-J-/B9.11.17 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 2HP-215
Description:
Tee to Reducer System ID: 51 A Component ID: B09.011.017 /2HP-215-3 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: 0.531 "/4" Limitations: NONE Start Time: 1050 Finish Time: 1057 Examination Surface. Inside 3 Outside 6 Surface Condition: GROUND Lo Location: 9.1.1.1 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 03125 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE32768 Surface Temp.: 71 IF Scanning dB: 55.7 Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-193 Ind. % Amplitude Position One Position Max Position Two Loss- . -Remarks N.Back Wall Full Screen Li W W2 MP LM W11 W2 MP L2 WI W2 MP NRI Comments: FC 03-20 Results: lReject Accept Info Initial Section XeExamination Percent Of Coverage ObtainedJ > 90%: Yes-1 00% Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level Ill / Signature Eaton, Jaly A.
Examiner Level l (gIk,3/30/2004 ignature Date IReviewer 9, A ~
Date Site Review Otk I
/
fN fiSignature D__:
Signature Al 1-Date It-Date Other Level Signature Date ANII Review / Signature Date
Attachment B Page 3Cof 75 lo Duke Supplemerital Report Report No.: UT-04-1 08 V Energy.
Page: 2 of 2 Summary No.: B09.011.017 Z-- I ,1l Examiner: Eaton, Jay A.
Examiner:
5-V Level:
Level:
liI Reviewer:
Site Review:
1S4a-,A7m2 Date: g-I-O ,
Date:
Other: -
Level: ANII Review: A CA>-@ Date:
Comments:
Sketch or Photo: CADocuments and Settings\kbertoc\My Documents\PaintLine4.jpg O0
ALuacfment B Page 35of 7 5 Duke UT Pipe Weld Examination OLEnergy.
Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: N DE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: B0O9.011.017 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-109 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98604011 Page: 1 of :3 Code: Asme Section XI 1989 Cat./Item: B-J-/B9.11.17 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 2HP-215
Description:
Tee to Reducer System ID: 51 A Component ID: B09.01 1.017 /2HP-215-3 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: 0.531 "/4" Limitations: Yes - See attached limitation report Start Time: 1103 Finish Time: 1124 Examination Surface: Inside 7 Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.1.1.1 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 03125 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE32768 Surface Temp.: 71 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-194, CAL-04-195, CAL-04-196 Angle Used 0 l45 45T 60 60L l l Scanning dB 50.3 54.7 61.5 Indication(s): Yes! No + Scan Coverage: Upstream i Downstream [d CW 7i CCW i Comments:
Results: Accept v# Reject Info [' Initial Section XI Examination Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:- No - 88.8% Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level iI J.l..2 -Signature Date Reviewer , A /V7 Signature Date Eaton, Jay A. 3/30/2004 ot. J /1 //lon-'o Examiner Level lI Signature Date Site Review YI Signature Date Other Level Signature Date ANII Review Signature Date
__7 J JlrWgrlfr LG!
Attachment B Page 36 of 75 I~ke Limitation Record
- dIVMY.
- Site/Unit: Oconee I 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: B09.011.017 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-109 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98604011 Page: 2 of 3 Description of Limitation: Gz Limited in the throat of the tee on the Sfside of the weld with the 60 shear wave. Lo + 5.0" to Lo + 9.0" 6cs 5313OAc Sketch of Limitation:
lz7- 60WZ -s I5 D1Y1M. FE-4AM- AlZFA = X7 (, 1LZ C
(A ' 5V-W~(LCO "A ~oC-- 5 " 2>-'- %k-7-7 = . 0, /, -Z I Y-1 (>O -= L 7,8 /
(PQ 0 IC) O 0/c, - Li Z.-6 7. -= 57 -Z 0/1 Limitations removal requirements:
Radiation field:
Examiner Level
__ _ _ __ __ _ _I
, -E ,:
,1 Date Reviewer Signature Date 3Ai s4~(
Examiner Level
- Ili: Vk__Z4ghitureide
-4.
513010 tt11 Date ISite Review
_-- - .. AL :-
Signature IHi%
, I
/- /, .
- I - It1G
/_
-U' 1,
bate ther Levlei A., A.
Signature Date ANII Review Signature Date I
As,)k, O. gS;60 t 4. /
Attachment B Page 3 7of 75 Duke Determination of Percent Coverage for U6'Energy. UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit: Oconee 1 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: B09.011.017 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-109 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98604011 Page: 3 of 3 45 deg Scan 1 % Length X % volume of length /(00 = % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 % Length X % volume of length / 100 = % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000 % Length X 100.000 % volume of length / 100 = 100.000 % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 100.000 % volume of length / 100 = 100.000 % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = 100.000 % total for 45 deg Other deg - 60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 71.600 % Length X 100.000 % volume of length/ 1 00 = 71.600 %total for Scan 1 Scan 2 71.600 % Length X 100.000 % volume of length I 100 = 71.600 V. total for Scan 2 Scans % 28.400 % Length X 42.800 % volume of length / 100 = 12.155 V%total for Scan 3 Scan Z 28.400 % Length X 0.000 % volume of length /100 = 0.000 % total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans lo determine; 88.839 % Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor: (_> Date: 3l VO OI o ar mA LoO;0 ( . Ago Z z 1 .0 C gX-i SCAN I-,,er %3.w:ZL 2 Vr4A) % Ct o,)CG AtitAj \A d
Attachment B
,k UT Base Met. Lamination Page 38 of 75 Procedure: NDE-640 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-04-013 Summary No.: Co5.021.021 Work Order No.: 98606481 Page: 1 of 2 Workscope: ISI Cat./Item: C-F-1/C5.21.21 Location: N/A Code: Asme Section Xl 1989 Drawing No.: 2-51 A-1 7 (2)
Description:
Pipe to Valve (Valve 2HP-118)
System ID: 51 A Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: 4.0' /.531 Component ID: C05.021.021 /2-51A-17-124 Start Time: 0957 Finish Time: 1000 Limitations: None Examination Surface: Inside f Outside 3 Surface Condition: AS GROUND Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Lo Location: 9.1.1.3 MCNDE 27219 Surface Temp.: 97 OF Scanning dB: 60 Temp. Tool Mfg: FISHER Serial No.:
Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-019
% Amplitude Position One Position Max Position Two Ind.
Remarks Loss % -
Li WI W2 MP LM W1 W2 MP L2 W1 W2 MP Back Wall Full Screen NRI Comments: FC 03-20 Results: Accept 0 Reject E Info E Initial Section Xl Inspection Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: Yes-100% Reviewed Previous Data: No Date Reviewer/ Signature Date Examiner Level I ll Signature 2/9/2004 2-11.o Eaton, Jay A.
Date Site Review Signature Date Examiner Level II dr n
Iu e 2/9/2004 _.
Jordan, Joey L Date ANII Revi Signature Date Other Level N/A Signature N/A
Attachment B Page Jof 75 k Duke Supplemental Report Report No.: UT-04-01 3
?MEnergy.
Page: 2 of 2 Summary No.: C05.021.021 n Examiner: Eaton, Jay A. CJ44- Level: IlIl Reviewer: , ho,, A fiLg.,, Date: ?, //. a P+
Examiner: Jordan, Joey Site Review: Date:
.,-CaZ59L Level: II 100"1-Other: N/A Level: N/A ANI1 Review: -
Date: Z/i ;'/O Comments:
Sketch or Photo: ZA\UT\IDO EAL\Prof i~eLine2,jpg
?i~ Si-1~36 2 6 t 12t )
0*
I I I
II _ i I I I I I l I
Attachment B Page 4eo of 75 Duke UT Pipe Weid Examination 4VEnergy.
Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: C05.021.021 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-016 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98606481 Page: 1 of 3 Code: Asme Section XI 1989 Cat./Item: C-F-1/C5.21.21 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 2-51 A-1 7 (2)
Description:
Pipe to Valve (Valve 2HP-118)
System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.021 /2-51 A-1 7-124 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: 4.0" /.531 Limitations: Yes-See Attached Limitation Report Start Time: 1000 Finish Time: 1040 Examination Surface: Inside Outside [J] Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.1.1.3 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27219 Surface Teri mp.: 97 °F Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-022, CAL-04-026, CAL-04-030 Angle Used 0 145 1 45T 1 60 60L l l Scanning dB 1 60 60 57 _
Indication(s):
. . Yes: No V Scan Coverage:v Upstream 7i Downstream I 7 CWLv~ CCW ~V nag Comments:
Results: Accept v Reject '7, Info EL Initial Section Xl Inspection Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: l No - 34.5% Reviewed Previous Data:
Attachment B L Duke Determination of Percent Coverage for Page 4 of 75
[#Energy UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: C05.021.021 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-016 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98606481 Page: 2 of 3 45 deq Scan 1 % Length X % volume of length / 100 = % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 % Length X % volume of length / 100 = % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length / 100 = 50.000 % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length /1 00 = 50.000 % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = 50.000 % total for 45 deg Other deg - 60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 100.000 % Length X 38.100 % volume of length /100 = 38.100 % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 100.000 % Length X o.ooo % volume of length /1 00 = 0.000 % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 % Length X % volume of length /1 00 = % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 % Length X % volume of length /1 00 = % total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 34.525 % Total for complete exaj Site Field Supervisor: Date: z ql4 L ts()
< 00 Ze tanJ do t2 u T ar fl C A - Q 0 0: r o .
C>,06Ad-' SCAS -Pt ar-o>Rl_ t ,M>l:G w
Attachment B Limitation Record Page4; of75 Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 jmmary No.: C05.021.021 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-016 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98606481 Page: 3 of 3 Description of Limitation:
Limited Due to Valve Configuration Sketch of Limitation: \ Sz-. ?UiC s li e&Co-VL. So'
-V-0T-AL, C-%eLAw AOgfA *i& V~ t s .zZt 7-z Z.
("OD WZL Cev"--61/4L'&5 = ZI - .1 5 / Z i At
-. >4. 10L' -Z '5 67 L4 `5 C&C~ X'a(Z'. - l ~
Limitations removal requirements:
NIA Radiation field: N/A (1
Examiner Level ll I i1 ignature Date Reviewe Signature Date Eaton, Jay A. ( 21912004 X1 / Ci/-a Examiner Level It re Date Site Review y Signature Date Jordan, Joey 2/9/2004 O)ther Level X,-Signature Date ANIIR 9 e 7 Signature Date
_ __ _ __ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ /2 /JT Yv
Attachment B
,._.ti UT Base Mek. Lamination Page S'3 of 75
[' . ....
Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-640 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: Co5.021.022 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-04-014 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98606481 Page: 1 of 2 Code: Asme Section XI 1989 Cat./Item: C-F-1/C5.21.22 Location: N/A Drawing No.; 2-51A-17 (2)
Description:
Valve (2HP-115) to Tee System ID: 51 A Component ID: C05.021.022 /2.51 A-i7-92 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: 4.0" /.531 Limitations: None Start Time: 0953 Finish Time: 0957 Examination Surface. Inside 5 Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.1.1.1 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg. FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27219 Surface Temp.: 97 OF Scanning dB: 60 Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-019
% Ampltude Position One Position Max Position Two No Loss -4 - -Remarks Back Wall Full Scrren Li WI W2 MP LM W1 W2 MP L2 W1 W2 MP NRI Comments: FC 03-20 Results: Accopt W Reject ° Info E Initial Section XI Inspection Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90 %: Yes-i 00% Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level III ignature Date Review ed , Signature Date Eaton, Jay A. 2/9/2004 2-10 Examiner Level II ature Date Site Review ,V ( Signature Date Jordan, Joey 2/9/2004 Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review/oe Signature Date N/A .2 A7V
Attachlment B Page 4e#of 75 Pk Duke Supplemelital Report Report No.: UT-04-014 V Energy.
Page: 2 of 2 Summary No.: C05.021.022 /-- 1 Examiner: Eaton, Jay A. Level: III Reviewer: -,'nd 2Q,--
, Date:
Examiner: Jordan, Joey Level: It Site Review: Date:
CXX Z -I'
- . 9z Other: N/A Level: N/A ANII Review: Date: __ __ _
Comments:
Sketch or Photo: Z:\UThlD DEAL\Prof HeLine2.jpg 15 Z.---rgc VtU-LrL $Is 0 4 A () -.
i I Attachment B Page %SCof75 I Duke UT Pipe Weld Examination rWEnergy.
Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: Co5.021.022 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-017 Workscope: iS' Work Order No.: 98606481 Page: 1 of 5 Code: Asme Section XI 1989 Cat./Item: C-F-1/C5.21.22 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 2.51 A-17 (2)
Description:
Valve (2HP-1 15) to Tee System ID: 51 A Component ID: C05.021.022 /2-51A-17-92 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: 4.0" 1.531 Limitations: Yes-See Attached Limitation Report Start Time: 1000 Finish Time: 1040 Examination Surface: Inside 2 Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.1.1.1 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27219 Surface Temp.: 97 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-022, CAL-04-026, CAL-04-030 Angle Used 0 145 1 45T 160 1 60L l l Scanning dB 60 60 57 Indication(s): Yes v' No Scan Coverage: Upstream I] Downstream cw/
Co W CCW Li Comments:
Results: Accept V Reject Info [] Initial Section XI Inspection Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: No - 34.5% Reviewed Previous Data: No l 11 Examiner Level Ill Signature Date Reviewer I 0 Signature Date Eaton, Jay A. (i/ 2/9/2004 :7k / 1 /( A-Mo4 Examiner Level II _ e Date Site Review Y Signature Date Jordan, Joey 2/9/2004 _ C Other Level Signature Date ANII R Signature Date
Attachment B Page %gof 75 Liuke Ultrasonic Indication Report V Energy.
Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: C05.021.022 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-017 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98606481 Page: 2 of 5 Wyo 5rnxx Search Unit Angle: 60 RL Q (3 Piping Welds CL 1 W2 WII Wo Location: C/L of Weld 0 Ferritic Vessels > 2"T Lo Location:
9.1.1.1 D Other .....
-.,. 6 MP Metal Path Wmax Distance From Wo To S.U. At Maximum Response
,.F_ SL......
RBR Remaining Back Reflection W1 Distance From Wo At Of Max (Forward)
L Distance From Datum W2 Distance From Wo At Of Max (Forward)
Comments:
Attachment B Page S7 of 75 ike Supplen ital Report Report No.: UT-04-017 NO ery.
Page: 3 of 5 Summary No.: C05.021.022 d
Examiner: Eaton, Jay A.
Level: III Reviewer: A', A /e Date: ,, A_ o Examiner: Jordan, Joey Level: II Site Review: Date:
Other: -
Level: ANII Review:
- - - 1;11' I Date: -1 YZ Comments: Ind. # 1 - 60'L is a geometric reflector from the weld root. This was verified by plotting the indication. There was no response at this location from the 600 and 70° shear waves.
Sketch or Photo: Z:\UT\I DDEAL\ProfieLine2. jog S7Z-1 Sf'E-C DrOdL 1_I
Attachment B Determination of Percent Coverage for Page 48 of 75 PL~~ke;y UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit: Oconee I 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: C05.021.022 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-017 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98606481 Page: 4 of 5 45 deg Scan 1 % Length X % volume of length /100 = % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 % Length X % volume of length /100 = % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length / 100 = 50.000 % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length/ 100 = 50.000 % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = 50.000 % total for 45 deg Other deg - 60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 100.000 % Length X 38.100 % volume of length 1100 = 38.100 % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 100.000 % Length X 0.000 % volume of length /1 00 = 0.000 % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 % Length X % volume of length 1100 = % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 % Length X % volume of length / 100 = % total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 34.525 % Total for complete e m Site Field Supervisor: ML Date: l Z 104
>C>X
- 1 o 5A rb njf 1 u s IBM fC)C(Di9 DiOW o ~fZ ( 9 O/
o~tb)t~a<(L0 e kc
Attachment B Page q- of 75*
Limitation Record
$jjellh*L Oconag / 2 Procedure: N4Dr-6Wo Outva No-, OH$ZEOC2O
.xmmary N~o.: COG.021.02 Pomcdure Rev- is Repocd No.: LJT.04-c¶T'1 Workscope: ; Work Otdec No.: hat-owlS Pago: 5s of S poscliption of Ikmftdion:
LIMited Due to VAVIS GOnfiguratiOnl Sketch of Umitaflon:
e'ao"ZL, *:O'F*
0r-t 5AI a 1006CA.L 004- CLLv
- *'/,Stzi %IoO~
Uimhazons rmOMVa1 requirements:
WA
Attachment B Page to of 75'
, ,,A UT Base Met, ..amination
'4,."gy.
Site/Unit Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-640 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No. C05.021.023 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-04-026 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98606488 Page: 1 of. 2 Code: Asme Section XI 1989 Cat./Item: C-F-1/C5.21.23 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 2-51A-17 (3)
Description:
Valve (2HP-118) to Elbow System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.023 /2-51 A-1 7-125 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: 4.0" / .531 Limitations: None Start Time: 0905 Finish Time: 0908 Examination Surface: Inside 3 Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.1.1.2 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27219 Surface Temp.: 97 OF Scanning dB: 62 Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-042 Ind. % Amplitude Position One Position Max Position Two Loss % - --- ___Remarks No. Back Wall Full Screen lL Wi W2 MP LM WI1 W2 MP L2 WI1 W2 MP NRI Comments: FC 03-20 Results: Accept i Reject D Info a Initial Section Xl Inspection Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90% Yes-100% Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level III Signature Date Reviewer 9, Signature Date Eaton, Jay A. 2/10/2004 , ./ / O*/4 Examiner Level IA -m ature Date Site Review Signature Date Jordan, Joey 2/10/2004 Other Level N- Signature Date ANII Review g Signature Date N/A/U)(t?9 C t yL ( t2ti
Attachment B PageS? of 75 Duke Supplemeial Report Report No.: UT-04-026 P1Energy.
Page: 2 of 2 Summary No.: C05.021.023 11~
Examiner: Eaton, Jay A. Level: III Reviewer: Date: ,2- ,.-o a Examiner: Jordan, Joey Level: II Site Review: .u" 6!A,'z' Date:
Other: N/A Level: N/A ANII Review:
U (I
UAvv p i Date: -31zle Comments:
Sketch or Photo: Z:\UTlODDEAL\ProfileLine2.jpg
'5 w~(-C5LAD 1V
Attachment B Page S= of 75 Duke UT Pipe Weld Examination ESEnergy.
Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: Co5.021.023 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-030 Workscope: [Si Work Order No.: 98606488 Page: 1 of 3 Code: Asme Section Xl 1989 Cat./Item: C-F-1/C5.21.23 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 2-51A-17 (3)
Description:
Valve(2HP-118)to Elbow System ID: 51 A Component ID: C05.021.023 /2-51 A-1 7-125 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: 4.0" / .531 Limitations: Yes-See Attached Limitation Report Start Time: 0925 Finish Time: 0955 Examination Surface: Inside; Outside [i7 Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.1.1.2 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27219 Surface Temp.: 97 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-043, CAL-04-045, CAL-04-048 Angle Used 0 45 45T 60 60L Scanning dB 61 62 57 Indication(s): Yes No v Scan Coverage: Upstream 7 1 Downstream CW v CCW v Comments:
Results: Accept v Reject Info EJ Initial Section Xl Inspection Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: No - 34.5% Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level IlIl Signature Date Reviewerq Signature
- Date Eaton, Jay A. 2/10/2004 / /l 2J Examiner Level Si lure Date Site Review Signature Date Jordan, Joey 2/10/2004 Other Level N/A, / Signature Date ANII Review Jj ignature Iz_ Date N/A /U6rje
Attachment B lb 4uke Determination of Percent Coverage for Page53 of 75 PtEnergy UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit: Oconee I 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: C05.021.023 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-030 Workscope: IS1 Work Order No.: 98606488 Page: 2 of 3 45 deg Scan 1 % Length X % volume of length / 100 = % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 % Length X % volume of length / 100 = % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length /100 = 50.000 % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length I 100 = 50.000 % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = 50.000 % total for 45 deg Other deg - 60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 100.000 % Length X 38.100 % volume of length /100 = 38.100 % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 100.000 % Length X 0.000 % volume of length / 100 = 0.000 % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 % Length X % volume of length /1 00 = % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 % Length X % volume of length / 100 = % total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals lor each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 34.525 % Total for complete xam Site Field Supervisor: Date: zL4 ssa3 ' 0CZ Loc? R o5'SoPe, -. ) 9)(70 AC
< And ~~- a(a eo izjV1/cork oCe ASaAD Z'S-A D
Attachment B Limitation Record Page 50of 75 SitelUnit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Immary No.: C05.021.023 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-030 Workscope: Ist Work Order No.: 98606488 Page: 3 of 3 Description of Limitation:
Limited due to Valve Configuration.
VAW(A1 SX 0A2300 Sz Sketch of Limitation:
C~ocAL~r.
-ri-rT~AL "LAvv\ AO-6A .1I & (,1. .Zi l.z
(.oo ;5" I ft C.04C-ALCC
'I- .05 =V&0 -~jo:' cct.
L4'$a o 17 .Z -~ 7.= 15/z VL 100 I Limitations removal requirements:
N/A
Attachment B Page 55 f 75 10 ,a UT Base Met,. amination Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-640 Outage No.: ONS2EOC2O Summary No.. C05.021.051 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-04-01 5 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98606478 Page: 1 of 2 Code: Asme Section Xi 1989 Cat./Item: C-F-1/C5.21.51 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 2-51A-17 (1)
Description:
Pipe to Valve (2LP-56)
System ID: 51 A Component ID: C05.021.051 /2-51 A-1 7-20A Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: 3.0" /.216 Limitations: None Start Time: 0950 Finish Time: 0953 Examination Surface: Inside 1 Outside 73 Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.1.1.1 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27219 Surface Temp.: 97 OF Scanning dB: 58 Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-021 Ind. % Amplitude Position One Position Max Position Two Loss ____Remark~s No.
BackiWat =W FullScreen LI W2 MP LM Wi W2 MP 1L2 WI W2 MP NRI Comments: FC 03-20 Results: Accept 7 Reject 3 Info E Initial Section XI Inspection Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: Yes-100% Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level III Signature Date Review77 A Signature Date Eaton, Jay A.
Examiner Level I ure 2/9/2004 . kc Date Site Review o/0 Il Y
/ A I Signature q-Date Jordan, Joey ( 2/9/2004.
Other Level N/A / /Z -' Signature Date ANII Reviewl) Signature - D)ate N/A StAZ6, I CA<:z l _- wO
- I
{s
- _ ,
'I
Attachment B Page S of 75 h Duke Supplemental Report Report No.: UT-04-01 5 1MEnergy.
Page: 2 of 2 Summary No.: C05.021.051 /"- I ---
Examiner: Eaton, Jay A. Level: III Reviewer: ho, A d Date: 2-iion1 Examiner: Jordan, Joey Level: II Site Review: , Date:
.,- C4951i/
Other: N/A Level: N/A ANII Review: C-V6& Date: JZ/_Y Comments:
Sketch or Photo: Z:\UT\1DDEAL\ProfiieLine2.jpg S5Z \JAuC 51 ?le, I N Il lI I l I I I TI
.1 . ~ g
Attachment 1 Page 37 of 75 Duke UT Pipe Weid Examination VEnergy.
Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: Co5.021.051 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-018 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98606478 Page: 1 of 3 Code: Asme Section Xi 1989 Cat./ltem: C-F-1/C5.21.51 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 2-51 A-17 (1)
Description:
Pipe to Valve (2LP-56)
System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.051 /2-51A-17-20A Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: 3.0" /.216 Limitations: Yes-See Attached Lkimitatlon Report Start Time: 1010 Finish Time: 1030 Examination Surface: Inside i Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.1.1.1 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27219 Surface Temp.: 97 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-024, CAL-04-028, CAL-04-029 Angle Used 0145 45Tl 60 70 l Scanning dB 56 60 63 Indication(s): Yes No v Scan Coverage: Upstream i Downstream EI CW E1 CCW i Comments:
Results: Accept v Reject Info F7 Initial Section Xi Inspection Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: A No - 35.2% Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level ill Signature Date Reviewer Signature Date Eaton, Jay A. 2/9/2004 /t, o g Examiner Level II i re Date Site Review - l Signature Date Jordan, Joey 2/9/2004 Other Level N/A / Signature Date ANII Review ,.q ~ ) t r Date N/A 4.,,61Lre 3Z-1a
Attachment B Page S8 of 75 Determination of Percent Coverage for
..... y UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Clutage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: C05.021.051 Procedure Rev.: 15 FReport No.: UT-04-018 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98606478 Page: 2 of 3 45 deq Scan 1 % Length X % volume of length /100 = % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 % Length X % volume of length /100 = % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length /100 = 50.000 % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length / 100 = 50.000 % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = 50.000 % total for 45 deg Other deg - 60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 100.000 % Length X 40.600 % volume of length /1 00 = 40.600 % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 100.000 % Length X 0.000 % volume of length 1 100 = 0.000 % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 % Length X % volume of length 1100 = % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 % Length X % volume of length / 100 = % total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 35.150 % Total for complete exa Site Field Supervisor: Date:
0e: \A6tA
" , ?OA%-)Ca; s° >
LI<r swcs 54b~X<>
6sr~~~~~~~~~
SA Hoa
-G AdA ,3 -t CO\CLA~eo
Attachment B Page S of 75 Limitation Record Site/Unit;. Oconee- / 2 - -Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: -. ONS2EOC2G ummary No.: C05.021.051 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-018 Workscope: IS1 Work Order No.: 98606478 Page: 3 of 3 Description of Limitation:
Limited Due to Valve Configuration Sketch of Limitation:
s,-Z YAL.VE-5t ?I?O_
(~iOO
.c2$l7o
-roIMw.- E.4tA&v A gEA, = O.& A~ 0-7 -
04D _prc~Z= O.s-O~1 Z .
X . ~ Z 3.Y4.c0D - L 4 0.( o i,6i e_ Cx,,o -g-AL<C_ = S ( - %oZLJ: V-0. ~. a%-4I L=. ) , .. ,,
Limitations removal requirements:
N/A
Attachment B Lo UT Base Mek .amination Page 6a of 75 oiHa.
Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-640 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: C05.021.054 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-04-027 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98606499 Page: 1 of 2 Code: Asme Section Xi 1989 Cat./Item: C-F-1/C5.21.54 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 2-51 A-1 7 (4)
Description:
Tee to Pipe System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.054 /2-51A-17-102 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: 3.0" /.438 Limitations: None Start Time: 0913 Finish Time: 0916 Examination Surface: inside D Outside FvJ Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.1.1.1 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mig.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27219 Surface Temp.: 97 OF Scanning dB: 62 Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-031 Ind. % Amplitude Position One Position Max Position Two Loss - - --- Remarks No. Back Wall Full Screen LI WI W2 MP LM W1 W2 MP L2 W1 W2 MP NRI Comments: FC 03-20 Results: Accept Dj Reject ° Info 2 Initial Section Xi Inspection Percent Of Coverage Obtained> 90%: Yes-100% Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level III Signature Date Reviewera / Signature Date Eaton, Jay A. 2/1012004 O.J, / // Al Examiner Level II atu Date Site Review Yl Signature Date Jordan, Joey 2/10/2004 Other Level Signature Date ANII Review Signature Date khge AiaAm3/°
Attachment B Page At of 7 5 f Duke Supplemeincal Report Report No.: UT-04-027 OrEnergy.
Page: 2 of 2 Summary No.: C05.021.054 /,\ I Examiner: Eaton, Jay A. Level: III Reviewer: Date: 2.?i{ ,,
Examiner: Jordan, Joey Level: II Site Review: Date:
Other:
- , ANII Review:
Li 6--
Level: Date: 312hv Comments:
Sketch or Photo: E \UT\ DDEAL\ProfileLine2.jpg 7-f s Z.
- 0. O* Q, '
Attachment B Page 6of 75 Duke UT Pipe Weid Examination reV Energy.
Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: Co5.021.054 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-031 Workscope: Is' Work Order No.: 98606499 Page: 1 of 3 Code: Asme Section Xl 1989 Cat./ltem: C-F-1/C5.21.54 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 2-51A-17 (4)
Description:
Tee to Pipe System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.054 /2-51 A-1 7-102 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: 3.0"/ .438 Limitations: Yes - See Attached Limitation Report Start Time: 0921 Finish Time: 0948 Examination Surface: Inside Outside R] Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.1.1.1 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27219 Surface Temp.: 97 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-033, CAL-04-044, CAL-04-047 Angle Used 1 0 45 l45Tl 60l 70 l l Scanning dB 61 62 61 Indication(s): Yes; No ~v Scan Coverage: Upstream 7 Downstream CW [ CCW /
Comments:
Results: Accept v Reject Info 2 Initial Section Xl Inspection Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: 4eir- 86.1 % Reviewed Previous Data: No I Il-i{-fil9 _
Examiner Level ill Signature Date Reviewer Signature Date Eaton, Jay A. 2/10/2004 > :I L)2//O'(
Examiner Level II k= S/ ure Date Site Review Signature Date Jordan, Joey (I 17 2/10/2004 Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review Signature Date N/A e(*L9' X L4b, 3/2,/o
Attachment B Page 63 of 75
?tlake Determination of Percent Coverage for teSsnergy UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: C05.021.054 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-031 Workscope: ISt Work Order No.: 98606499 Page: 2 of 3 45 deg Scan 1 % Length X % volume of length / 100 = % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 % Length X % volume of length I 100 = % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000 % Length X 100.000 % volume of length / 100 = 100.000 % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 100.000 % volume of length / 100 = 100.000 % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = 100.000 % total for 45 deg Other deg - 60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 63.600 % Length X 100.000 % volume of length / 100 = 63.600 _ V.total for Scan 1 Scan 2 63.600 % Length X 100.000 % volume of length / 100 = 63.600 Y.total for Scan 2 Scan s 36.400 % Length X 46.700 % volume of length / 100 = 16.999 Y. total for Scan 3 Cw- ZW4 Scant z 36.400 % Length X 0.000 % volume of length / 100 = 0.000 % total for Scan 4 Percent complete coveraae Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 86.050 % Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor: Date: l 94 no 70 so 5u.s spA c fJ 6(&CAY, C I; 7C 1 jO; yv. Dr Lo 1 CH C .
DOC-6 A~'>ZAu hCtl
Attachment B DWO&uke Limitation Record Page (oof 75 SitetUnit: Oconee 1 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20
-nary No.: C05.021.054 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT.04-031 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98606499 Page: 3 of 3 Description of Limitation:
Limited in the throat on each side of the tee on the S2 side of the weld. Lo + 1.75" to Lo + 3.75" and Lo + 7.25" to Lo + 9.25".
Sketch of Limitation:
IF I1 I Hi ADZ
>nQC< 5w. Sr-~-r~L.
COA-ML 4 PArM AsCans r *15 a( .0,
&Vs 5t .*L +.
Y,.% -z r)7/,t S - 01zaa LGS77%
q Z.
700 sheL c-3vcaAL-C. , \v!$ -. 0 1
- '05 / \5,= 53.3 Limitations removal requirements:
Radiation field: N/A Examiner Level IlIl S nature Date Rev r Signature Date Eaton, Jay A. 2 i1012004 )1sJL. IL& - .2* 1-°4 Examiner Level I I> ure Date Site Review \ Signature Date Jordan, Joey ( ` 2710/2004 ANIRviwD Other C'herDateevel Level 7"
' ,z~gnir 7
1~- Sg nt r Date ANII Reyiew ,L & ,, S,,SiMe :,/,, .c Date A,-'J--eq C.
,1 11 L%-
Attachment B UT Base Met,.. Lamination Page 45of 75
-D6<.HW
....... OY;#
Procedure: NDE-640 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-04-021 Summary No.: C05.021.056 Page: 1 of 2 Workscope: Is1 Work Order No.: 98606501 Cat./item: C-F-1/C5.21.56 Location: N/A Code: Asme Section Xl 1989 Drawing No.: 2HP-227
Description:
Elbow to Valve (2HP-114)
System ID: 51A Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: 3.0" /.438 Component ID: C05.021.056 /2HP-227-11 Start Time: 0911 Finish Time: 0916 Limitations: None Examination Surface: Inside 2 Outside iJ Surface Condition: AS GROUND Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Lo Location: 9.1.1.2 Wo Location:
MCNDE 27217 Surface Temp.: 81 OF Scanning dB: 40 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.:
Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-038 Position One Position Max Position Two
% Amplitude Remarks Loss No. MP LM WI W2 MP L2 W1 W2 MP Back Wall Full Screen Li W1 W2 NRI Comments FC 03-20 Results: Accept i Reject 7 Info 7 Initial Section Xl Inspection Yes-1 00% Reviewed Previous Data: No Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
Date Reviewer Signature Date Examiner Level ll .,Sigpure Houser, Gayle E. rtJ. 2/10/2004 Date Site Review N Signature Date Examiner Level II Signature Weaver, Marion T. , .2/10/2004 Date ANII Revi s Signature Date Other Level N/A Signature N/A
Attachment B Page 64of 7 5 Duke Supplemeincal Report Report No.: UT-04-021 9rEnergy.
Page: 2 of 2 Summary No.: C05.021.056 L Examiner: Houser, Gayle E. , /!zk ,< Level: III Reviewer: , h , Date: _2 -.//-04a Examiner: Weaver, Marion T. ,.,, 7J eat Level: II Site Review: T Il Date:
Other: N/A Level: N/A ANII Review: Date: 21-G-Zly Comments:
Sketch or Photo: Z:\UT\lDDEAL\ProtileLine2.jpg 041M. Z#P-1/ I I I I -I I
I I I I
\
Attachment B Page 67of75 bake UT Pipe Vvad Examination 10WEnergy.
Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: C05.021.056 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-023 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98606501 Page: 1 of 3 Code: Asme Section XI 1989 Cat./Item: C-F-1/C5.21.56 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 2HP-227
Description:
Elbow to Valve (2HP-114)
System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.056 /2HP-227-11 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: 0.438"/3" Limitations: Yes
- See attached limitation report Start Time: 0916 Finish Time: 0930 Examination Surface: Inside 7 Outside [ Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.1.1.2 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27217 Surface Temp.: 81 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-039, CAL-04-040, CAL-04-041 AngleUsed 0 45 45T 1 601 70 1 Scanning dB 45 48 48 Indication(s): Yes No V Scan Coverage: Upstream g Downstream i CW iV CCW i Comments:
Results: Accept 'v' Reject [ Info M Initial Section XI Inspection Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: No - 35.7% Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level Ill 1 qignatu Date Reviewq 1 A/ A/ Signature Date Houser, Gayle E. -A.. Age_ 2/10/2004 /wO! S ture Examiner Level II Signature Date Site Review Signature Date Weaver, Marion T. 2/10/2004 Other Level Signature Date ANII R Signature Date
-'-'- 7y,.2
Attachment B IPZ% Determination of Percent Coverage for Page 6 j of 75 UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit: Oconee I 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: C05.021.056 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-023 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98606501 Page: 2 of 3 45 deg Scan 1 % Length X % volume of length /1 00 = % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 % Length X % volume of length / 100 = % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length / 100 = 50.000 % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length / 100 = 50.000 % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = 50.000 % total for 45 deg Other deg - 60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 100.000 % Length X 42.900 % volume of length / 100 = 42.900 % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 100.000 % Length X 0.000 % volume of length 1 100 = 0.000 % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 % Length X % volume of length / 100 = % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 % Length X % volume of length /1 00 = % total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 35.725 % Total for complete exan'T Site Field Supervisor: . Da te: Zjo 0t4 0
o ) L ) I)a:-,,
XC1S> 0°IL CA z~t)I f l it(
Attachment B
?L Puke Limitation Record Page 6'1 of 75 Vitnerg.
Site/Unit: Oconee 1 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EQC20
,mmary No.: C05.021.056 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-023 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98606501 Page: 3 of 3 Description of Limitation:
Partial coverage from SI CW & CCW - No scan S2 due to valve configuration.
Sketch of Limitation:
V/AI<G L C- Z ECLZO " S I Co0CAkE C f0o\LU sAm Ae -A , k )4 5, = ,Lk ,-),
&lo v4G~a CoQC2-AiM4 0 ,- SQL, i ( , = ,0 0 Z-./o 7
V7,6 4A. C0 M i,-
C V t C C- 7 /,I 5o14 4S .LAk <Z. :, l4 tWoQ rAg Limitations removal requirements:
NIA Radiation field: N/A I
Examiner Level iII jSignaltite Date Reviewer Signature Date Houser, Gayle E. f - , f, j 2/1012004 z l 7- OLo4 Examiner Level It Sigriature Date Site Review Signature Date Weaver, Marion T. )eWe. 2/10/2004
'ther Level Signature Date ANII R Signature Date to / 2.7o
Attachment B Page 70 of 75
^~ Airk UT Base MetL -amination ace.MY~
Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-640 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Sumi ,nary No: C05.021.058 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-04-104 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98604113 Page: 1 of . 2 Code: Asme Section XI 1989 Cat./item: C-F-1/C5.21.58 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 2-51A-31
Description:
Pipe to Valve (2HP-20)
System ID: 51 A Component ID: C05.021.058 /2-51A-31-50 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: .438"/3.0" Limitations: NONE Start Time: 1103 Finish Time: 1105 Examination Surface: Inside E Outside M Surface Condition: GROUND Lo Location: 9.1.1.1 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 03125 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE32769 Surface Temp.: 63 OF Scanning dB: 45 Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-186 Ind. % Amplitude Position One Position Max Position Two No Loss % I I Remarks Back Wall Full Screen WI W2 MP LM WI W2 MP L2 W1 W2 MP NRI Comments: FC 03-20 Results: Accept i Reject a Info E Initial Section IX Inspection Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: Yes 100% Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level I Si ature Date Reviewer /i A / Signature Date Resor, James H. 3/30/2004L-6 Examiner Level II nature Date Site Review Signature Date Mauldin, Larry E. G /" 3/30/2004 Other Level Signature Date ANII Review, Signature Date
/g§2r-d;/f.B,>g i/(.
Attachment B Page 7fof 75 a Duke Supplemeiwcal Report Report No.:
UT-04-1 04 E Energy.
Page: 2 of 2 Summary No.: C05.021.058 Examiner: Resor, James H. Level: II Reviewer: aq" Date: Z. 31.o Examiner: Mauldin, Larry E.- Level: II Site Review: rI Date:
Other: Level: ANII Review: - Date: ,
j Comments:
Sketch or Photo: Z:\UT\PERSONEL\JHR9576\PaintLine4.jpg
- ,>- =.
a- > (n to _
1 I
I I
1 I
_,I L. l Ir l l I fiL-I -S Vj L.VL Si.J.
.I
Attachment B Page 7-.Zof 75 PV Energy.
Duke UT Pipe Weid Examination Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC20 Summary No.: CO!5.021.058 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-04-105 Workscope: lSI Work Order No.: 98604113 Page: 1 of 4 Code: Asme Section XI 1989 Cat./Item: C-F-1/C5.21.58 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 2-51A-31
Description:
Pipe to Valve (2HP-20)
System ID: 51 A Component ID: C05.021.058 /2-51 A-31-50 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: .438"/3.0" Limitations: Yes - See attached sheets Start Time: 1114 Finish Time: 1131 Examination Surface: Inside Outside it Surface Condition: GROUND Lo Location: 9.1.1.1 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 03125 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE32769 Surface Temp.: 63 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-04-187, CAL-04-188, CAL-04-189 Angle Used 0 l45 45T 60 70 Scanning d8 43 45 47 Indication(s): Yes No; ,
N- Scan Coverage: Upstream 3 Downstream ii CW il CCW i Comments:
- See attached limitation sheets Results: Accept V Reject 7 Info m Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: No* Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level 11 Signatur Date Reviewers ,_EA Signature Date Resor, James H. GR.. FLC$.
3/30/2004 JA/ .../ $/Z<Oq Examiner Level II na6.. Date Site Review Signature Date Mauldin, Larry E. 1 3/30/2004 Other Level Signature Date ANII Review Signature Date
______ c, I - t ur tLf/G I/
U
Attachment B Page 73of 75 DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT :
Component/Weld ID: 2-S/, -,3/-5Q Item No: C DS y, l. S8remarks:
3 NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION 4 I Lu e AE ELIMITED SCAN 1 0 2 l 2EcwLM ccw Co u FROM L H to L h_ INCHES FROM WO Z to' ___ __ __ _
ANGLE: 0 0 0 45 1 60 other FROM o DEGto 3()o DEG E NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION E LIMITED SCAN E1 E22 1 E2 E cw L ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: z 0 E 45 E 60 other FROM DEG to DEG E NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION ELIMITED SCAN E1 C Ecw 2El 2 c cow FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: 0° 45 r 60 other FROM _ DEG to _ DEG E NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION E LIMITED SCAN E1 E2 E 1 n 2 E cw F ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached ANGLE: I0°L 45 Q 60 other FROM DEG to DEG 2 yes E No Prepared By: Level: Date: 2 Sheet of 4 Reviewe By Shee of, Reviewed By: -"Date: /kuthorize Inspectr:Pte
Attachment B Page 7* of 75 Determination of Percent Coverage for POygUI UT Examinations - Pipe
-- Site/Unit: Oconee / 2 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS2EOC2O Summary No.: C05.021.058 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: IUT-04-105 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98604113 Page: 3 of 4 45 den Scan 1 % Length X % volume of length / 100 = % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 % Length X % volume of length /1 00 = % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000 % Length X 100.000 % volume of length /100 = 100.000 % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 100.000 % volume of length / 100 = 100.000 % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = 100.000 % total for 45 deg Other deg - 60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 100.000 % Length X 0.000 % volume of length /100 = 0.000 % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 100.000 % Length X 36.000 % volume of length / 100 = 36.000 % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 % Length X % volume of length /1 00 = % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 % Length X % volume of length / 100 = % total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 59.000 % Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor: dDate:K /t / C ic ' -(~,OLJ WIJ Vei iC,,4fi Iof AIAC1-0U0El Ike I)ZXC,~A1,/ c-1/ eo'z/etzl
' C(, / -fald i12 eo,,IglC- 4E A,,TS o-f 1 c i C -S7.Ss-Ytt Lb.)(.2 )(xV) (A)(I-)
i---7 r S-S4L tJ T/4 70IO L/ t.<JAV(e r7o a -B7rj A/
u~Oc V ~ /&,
C ZAC Ca~ c~Y £)hI P eC 1 ii /V0 X/.
Attachment B Page 75 of 75
?4`ure Supplemental Report rVEnerg Report No.:
Page: of Summary No.: Cio*. o2a. O-S .
Examiner: LA eE' E. MAULDIA- A4 d/),/41 Level: Iz Reviewer:
C- t~
Date: ___/
Examiner: II _Level:
A J1 Site Review: Date:
Other: i4 Level: ANII Review:
Smy.cvvt~aQj
[I4 . . Date: -I/
Comments:
/O"rA +R ei@n /, / 11 Ap/S " (76 - .18 .s i,/w Sketch or Photo: */G ( ,38 -+,10) - o 09 -Vb:,
CD GYe t, *- 1/ Se. Al. 3- G 2D~
710 OV J (w,06t MSu L -b 7---(t (; (-LX
- - / ( (. 72 -t-, ,7 ) z . / //2 36 5
. ./8s? Sf1 - G /. ?Y-
\§d )/A&uG Se ?9/fi
- - L ° 1d- A Va C&Vet(lC-A Wfi7 19- 70 S1NZ JAtIU \3etptAefTL r trFAtd
/IJ : 3 n6 n 7 Co--
-cV drI 9, /S /6oTa UJer2 o/iX' vLtA' C4LCLA r(sS.