ML032230332

Draft Information Input, Attachment 14, e-mailed on July 14, 2003 (50-313, 50-368, & 50-382)

ML032230332
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear, Waterford
Issue date:	07/14/2003
From:	Alexion T NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD4
To:	Sharon Bennett Entergy Operations
Shared Package
ML032260096	List: ML032230292 ML032230297 ML032230298 ML032230301 ML032230306 ML032230311 ML032230316 ML032230319 ML032230326 ML032230332 ML032230334 ML032230338 ML032230341 ML032230437 ML032230446 ML032230448 ML032230453 ML032230455 ML032230459 ML032230460 ML032230464 ML032230467
References
Download: ML032230332 (3)

Text

omas Alexion -Third RAI on Relaxation Requests -P-e From: Thomas Alexion To: BENNETT, STEVE A Date: 7/14/03 9:26AM

Subject:

Third RAI on Relaxation Requests Steve, See the attached.

Tom

tCAWIND0WSNTEMP\GW)00001.TMP Paae 11 Paw tC:\WINDOWSXTEMP\GWIOOOO1 .TMP l

Mail Envelope Properties (3F12AF82.742:0:20628)

Subject:

Third RAI on Relaxation Requests Creation Date: 7114/03 9:26AM From: Thomas Alexion Created By: TWA@nrc.2ov Recipients Action Date & Time entergy.com Transferred 07/14/03 09:26AM SBENNE2 (BENNETT, STEVE A)

Post Office Delivered Route entergy.com Files Size Date & Time CombinationRAI.wpd 3237 07/14/03 09:23AM MESSAGE 715 07/14/03 09:26AM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened

Request for Additional Information (RAI) and Comments Regarding Entergy Letter CNRO-2003-00027 (July 1, 2003), In Regard to Reactor Pressure Vessel Penetration Nozzle Inspection Using a Combination of NDE Methods Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO), Units I and 2, and Waterford

1. The licensee is requested to provide a table at the completion of the outage, listing each of the nozzles and the inspection method or combination of inspection methods that were performed for each Unit from ANO and Waterford, respectively.

2. The licensee is requested to provide justification for the need to perform a combination of inspections. Identify the limitations on the nozzles that require a combination of Inspections (i.e., funnels, threads thermal sleeves, etc.).

3. The licensee is requested to confirm that with a combination of inspection methods (i.e.,

Item 3 under Proposed Alternative), each nozzle will have complete coverage of the areas of concern (subject to any approved relaxations) as identified in the Order. Item 3 under Proposed Alternatives should clarify the scope for each examination method (as written the scope is not sufficient for ECT or PT), or adopt wording similar to that in the DC Cook relaxation request.