ML032230332
| ML032230332 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear, Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 07/14/2003 |
| From: | Alexion T NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD4 |
| To: | Sharon Bennett Entergy Operations |
| Shared Package | |
| ML032260096 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML032230332 (3) | |
Text
omas Alexion -Third RAI on Relaxation Requests
-P-e From:
Thomas Alexion To:
BENNETT, STEVE A Date:
7/14/03 9:26AM
Subject:
Third RAI on Relaxation Requests
- Steve, See the attached.
Tom
tCAWIND0WSNTEMP\\GW)00001.TMP Paw 1 ltC:\\WINDOWSXTEMP\\GWIOOOO1.TMP Paae 1 Mail Envelope Properties (3F12AF82.742:0:20628)
Subject:
Creation Date:
From:
Created By:
Third RAI on Relaxation Requests 7114/03 9:26AM Thomas Alexion TWA@nrc.2ov Recipients entergy.com SBENNE2 (BENNETT, STEVE A)
Action Transferred Date & Time 07/14/03 09:26AM Route entergy.com Post Office Delivered Files CombinationRAI.wpd MESSAGE Options Auto Delete:
Expiration Date:
Notify Recipients:
Priority:
Reply Requested:
Return Notification:
Concealed
Subject:
Security:
To Be Delivered:
Status Tracking:
Size 3237 715 Date & Time 07/14/03 09:23AM 07/14/03 09:26AM No None Yes Standard No None No Standard Immediate Delivered & Opened
Request for Additional Information (RAI) and Comments Regarding Entergy Letter CNRO-2003-00027 (July 1, 2003), In Regard to Reactor Pressure Vessel Penetration Nozzle Inspection Using a Combination of NDE Methods Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO), Units I and 2, and Waterford
- 1.
The licensee is requested to provide a table at the completion of the outage, listing each of the nozzles and the inspection method or combination of inspection methods that were performed for each Unit from ANO and Waterford, respectively.
- 2.
The licensee is requested to provide justification for the need to perform a combination of inspections. Identify the limitations on the nozzles that require a combination of Inspections (i.e., funnels, threads thermal sleeves, etc.).
- 3.
The licensee is requested to confirm that with a combination of inspection methods (i.e.,
Item 3 under Proposed Alternative), each nozzle will have complete coverage of the areas of concern (subject to any approved relaxations) as identified in the Order. Item 3 under Proposed Alternatives should clarify the scope for each examination method (as written the scope is not sufficient for ECT or PT), or adopt wording similar to that in the DC Cook relaxation request.