ML032230298
| ML032230298 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 06/05/2003 |
| From: | Bhalchandra Vaidya NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD4 |
| To: | Rogers R Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML032260096 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC MB6821 | |
| Download: ML032230298 (3) | |
Text
is
- A I IM~.2VV ?UUU1.I-
"I t:
I rMP\\WuOO PVU.
me Paen
_L, a
Mail Envelope Properties (3EDF3CC8.ADD: 21: 21146)
Subject:
Creation Date:
From:
Created By:
RE: Cooper Relief Request-RP-06-MB6821 6/5/03 8:51AM Bhalchandra Vaidya BKV@nrc.gov Recipients nppd.com reroger (Rogers, Ronald E.)
Action Transferred Date & Time 06/05/03 08:5 1AM Post Office Files MESSAGE Options Auto Delete:
Expiration Date:
Notify Recipients:
Priority:
Reply Requested:
Return Notification:
Concealed
Subject:
Security:
To Be Delivered:
Status Tracking:
Delivered Route nppd.com Size 5108 Date & Time 06/05/03 08:51AM No None Yes Standard No None No Standard hnmediate Delivered & Opened
Bhalchandra Vaida - RE: Cooper Relief Reguest-RP-06-MB6821 Page 1, From:
Rogers, Ronald E.
Date:
6/5/03 8:51AM
Subject:
RE: Cooper Relief Request-RP-06-MB6821 John Huang is okay with the e-mail I sent you.
We can have detailed discussions, if neccessary, during the next teleconference.
Thanks.
Bhalchandra Vaidya NRR/DLPM Licensing Project Manager, PDIV-1 Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1 301-415-3308 M/S: 0-7D1
>> 'Rogers, Ronald E. <reroger nppd.com> 06/05/03 08:43AM >>>
Mr. Vaidya, thank you for doing thisl This informal communication will be most helpful to the productive conduct of a telephone conference (telecon). I will use this for our meeting as preparation for the telecon.
I will coordinate this with others here at Cooper but I want to obtain Mr. Huang's feedback/comments before doing so. Have you heard back from John?
Thanks again, Ron Rogers
--- Original Message----
From: Bhalchandra Vaidya mailfto:BKV@ nrc.govl Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 3:01 PM To: Rogers, Ronald E.; John Huang Cc: Mohan Thadani
Subject:
Cooper Relief Request-RP-06-MB6821 I had a telephone conversation with Ron Rogers of Cooper, 402-825-5304 this aftemoon( 3:30pm).
The following the summary of the discussion:
I tried to explain to him, in my own words, what I understand to be the staff's concerns.
I pointed out that there are following concerns:
a) On page 1 of 15, the submission states that Cooper wants to follow the normal test frequency to avoid subjecting the pumps to unneccessary wear, potential challenge to the plant, and entry into TS LCO...
BUT on page 4 of 15, it states that vibrations at these low frequencies should not be detrimental to either the pump or the motor...
These two arguments do not support each other I b) The submission does not provide any basis for presumption that the observed vibration levels historically have not been detrimental to the performance of the pumps nor would they detrimental to the performance of the pumps In the future( until next test).
c) The Variation In the vibration results need to be explained and the basis for raising the Alert Level' need to be provided in the submission This includes the basis for the Revised Alert Leval".
Bhalchandra ai a
-E:
Coo r Relief Re ues-RP-06-MB6821 Page 2 d) My explainations are subject to corrections by the NRC staff.
Ron Is going to talk to the appropriate person(s) in his organization and get back to me.
Further, teleconversations/teleconferences may be needed.
John Huang Please let me know if I have mis-understood the subject.
Thenks..
Bhalchandra Vaidya NRR1DLPM Ucensing Project Manager, PDIV-1 Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1 301-415-3308 M/S: 0-7D1