ML032190661

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

"Draft Meeting" is not in the list (Request, Draft Request, Supplement, Acceptance Review, Meeting, Withholding Request, Withholding Request Acceptance, RAI, Draft RAI, Draft Response to RAI, ...) of allowed values for the "Project stage" property.

July 15, 2003, Meeting Handouts - to Discuss Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal at R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant
ML032190661
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/07/2003
From: Robert Schaaf
NRC/NRR/DRIP/RLEP
To:
References
TAC MB5225
Download: ML032190661 (17)


Text

NRC FORM 658 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (9-1999)

TRANSMITTAL OF MEETING HANDOUT MATERIALS FOR IMMEDIATE PLACEMENT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN This form is to be filled out (typed or hand-printed) by the person who announced the meeting (i.e., the person who issued the meeting notice). -The completed form, and the attached copy of meeting handout materials, wi be sent to the Document Control Desk on the same day of the meeting; under no circumstances will this be done later than the working day after the meeting.

Do not Include proprietary materials.

DATE OF MEETING The attached document(s), which was/were handed out in this meeting, is/are to be placed 08/07/2003 in the public domain as soon as possible. The minutes of the meeting will be issued in the near future. Following are administrative details regarding this meeting:

Docket Number(s) 50-244 Plant/Facility Name RE. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant TAC Number(s) (if available)

MB5225 Reference Meeting Notice Purpose of Meeting (copy from meeting notice)

July 15,2003 To Discuss the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) for License Renewal at RE. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant NAME OF PERSON WHO ISSUED MEETING NOTICE TITLE Robert G. Schaaf Project Manager OFFICE NRR DIVISION DRIP BRANCH RLEP Distribution of this form and attachments:

Docket File/Central File PUBLIC NRC FORM 658 (9-1999)

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER This farm was designed using InForms Dr-01

AGENDA FOR PUBLIC MEETING TO COLLECT COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, LICENSE RENEWAL THURSDAY. AUGUST 7.2003 Two Meeting Sessions - 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

I.

Welcome and purpose of meeting - 10 minutes (Chip Cameron, John Tappert)

II.

Overview of license renewal process - 5 minutes (Russell Arrighi)

III.

Overview of environmental review process - 5 minutes (Robert Schaaf)

IV.

Results of the environmental review - 30 minutes (Duane Neitzel, Mark Rubin)

V.

How comments can be submitted - 5 minutes (Robert Schaaf)

VI.

Public comments - 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> VII.

Closing/availability of transcripts, etc. - 5 minutes (Chip Cameron)

R.E. Ginna Draft SEIS Meeting Preliminary Results of Environmental Review Ginna Nuclear Plant Nuclear Regulat ission August 7, 03

..a b

s~~~~-F VI/o-t

)

Pur of Today's

> Discuss NRC's license renewal process

> Describe the environmental review process

> Discuss the results of our review

> Provide the review schedule

> Accept any comments you may have today

> Describe how to submit comments August 7, 2003 I

R.E. Ginna Draft SEIS Meeting HAI R. E. Ginna WJ Nuclea~r Plant

+***+

License ewal

> Operating license expires in 2009

> Application requests authorization to operate R.E. Ginna Nuclear Plant for up an additional 20 years I~

License Renewa view

> Safety review\\

> Environmental review

> Plant inspections

> Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)

August 7, 2003 2

R.E. Ginna Draft SEIS Meeting Natt Environmental

\\.,~~~~

AcPot

> NEPA requires Federal agenciestk n systematic approach to consider

\\

environmental impacts

> Commission has determined that an environmental impact statement (EIS) will be prepared for a license renewal action August 7, 2003 3

R.E. Ginna Draft SEIS Meeting j X Deci Standard for

~'W/ Environm al Review To determine whether or not the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal fo Ginna are so great that preserving the option o license renewal for energy planning decisionmakers would be unreasonable.

August 7, 2003 4

R.E. Ginna Draft SEIS Meeting Tea Expertise

    1. , *A UjF EnrimnmentalJuiece

^pnc E Ecology~~~~~~~~~~o Rndiafl~~~~~~n Regul~~~

Atory l

~~~EcdogyUs Eclg August 7, 2003 5

R.E. Ginna Draft SEIS Meeting

> NRC-defined impact levels:

\\

\\

> SMALL: Effect is not detectable or too small to destab e o noticeably alter any important attribute ofthe resource

> MODERATE: Effect is sufficient to alter noticeably, but no destabilize important attributes of the resource

> LARGE: Effect is clearly noticeable and sufficient to destabi important attributes of the resource

> Consistent with the Council on Environmental Quality guidance for NEPA analyses August 7, 2003 6

R.E. Ginna Draft SEIS Meeting n Memental Impacts w

~~~of ti on

> Cooling System

> Transmission Lines

> Radiological

> Socioeconomic

> Groundwater Use and Quality

> Threatened or Endangered Species If 00%

P System m

t

> Category 2 issues

> Entrainment

> Impingement

> Heat Shock

> Preliminary findings

> Impacts are SMALL

> No additional mitigation required I4 August 7, 2003 7

R.E. Ginna Draft SEIS Meeting d0 i

a

> Category 1 issues - exposures to th and to workers

> Preliminary findings

>No new and significant information i

> GEIS concluded impacts are SMALL Po Ptial New and Significa formation

> No new and significant information idnfe

> as a result of the scoping process

> by the licensee

> by the staff

> GEIS Category 1 conclusions not affected by presence of shoreline revetment August 7, 2003 8

R.E. Ginna Draft SEIS Meeting Cu atative Impacts of 0 ation 9 Considered impacts of renewal term ope tion combined with other past, present, and rea nat foreseeable future actions

> evaluated to end of 20-year renewal term

> geographic boundaries dependent on resource

> No significant cumulative impacts

~Envitnvironmental Impacts aluated 9 Uranium Fuel Cycle and Solid Waste Management

> Decommissioning August 7, 2003 9

R.E. Ginna Draft SEIS Meeting Al natives

> No-action

> Alternative energy sources

> New generation (Coal, Natural Gas, Nuclear)

> Purchased electrical power

> Other alternatives (Oil, Wind, Solar, Conservation)

> Combination of alternatives reliminary Conc ions for Alterna es

> Alternatives (including the no-action alte may have environmental effects in at least:

impact categories that reach MODERATE, LARGE significance August 7, 2003 10

R.E. Ginna Draft SEIS Meeting N

\\

> Design-basis accidents

> Severe accidents

> Severe accident mitigation alternatives (SAMAs) 24 SA Evaluation 9 Characterize overall plant risk

> Identify potential improvements

> Quantify risk reduction potential and implementation costs

> Determine whether implementation of any of 1 improvements is required to support license renewal August 7, 2003 11

R.E. Ginna Draft SEIS Meeting

\\

2 Pre i

-ary Results of W

SAMA ation

~*

  • 41 9 Approximately 200 candidate improvements cI

> Set of SAMAs reduced to 8 based on multi-step s enin process

> Detailed cost/benefit analysis shows that 2 of the 8 candidates are cost beneficial:

> obtain a skid-mounted 480V diesel generator for station blacko t events

> modify procedures to allow cross-connection of charging pumps PreiW ary Results of t)

SAMA aluation A*

9 Two SAMAs found to be cost beneficial

> not related to managing the effects of aging

> not required to be implemented as part of license renewal

> entered into Ginna plant change request system for prioritization with other plant improvements 24 August 7, 2003 12

R.E. Ginna Draft SEIS Meeting liminary Conc ions A*

  • H

> Impacts of license renewal are SMALL for am tareas

> Impacts of alternatives to license renewal range frm SMALL to LARGE

> The staffs preliminary recommendation is that the ad rse environmental impacts of license renewal for Ginna are ot so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decisionmakers would be unreasonable 25 August 7, 2003 13

RE. Ginna Draft SEIS Meeting F*gj Poin f Contact and I!~/

Referenc cuments

> Agency point of contact:

Robert Schaaf (800) 368-5642, Ext. 1312

> Documents located at the Ontario Public Library, 185 Ridl Road, Ontario, New York, and the Rochester Public Li ary 115 South Street, Rochester, New York

> Draft SEIS can also be viewed at the NRC's Web site (www.rirc.gov) at: www.nrc.gov/reading-nildoc-collections/nuregs/staff/srl437/supplementl4/

l 2\\

~~~~~~~

> By mail at: Chief, Rules and Directi Division of Administrative Mailstop T-6D59 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory C(

> In person at: 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland

> E-mail at: GinnaEISe)nrc.gov August 7, 2003 14

RE. Ginna Draft SEIS Meeting

_eNt RE,4 4, J f

~0 August 7, 2003 15