ML031820710

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Meeting Handouts by Tennessee Valley Authority Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Exemption Request for the Alternative Source Team Methodlogy - Attachment 2
ML031820710
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 07/01/2003
From: Langley T
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Jabbour K, NRR/DLPM, 415-1496
Shared Package
ML031820450 List:
References
TAC MB5733, TAC MB5734, TAC MB5735
Download: ML031820710 (16)


Text

-Tennessee Valley Authority f Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Exemption Request for the Alternative Source Term Methodology

., . L~~~

I P.

Agenda WAi

  • Meeting Objectives
  • Background
  • Regulatory Criteria

+ Summary and Conclusion Tony Langley 1

Introduction/Meeting Objectives IL

  • o Meeting Objective

- To reach a consensus on the content of TVA's proposed exemption request to 10 CFR 50 Appendix A - Criterion 41 Tony Langley 2

Background U

  • TVA submitted the AST license amendment request (TS 405) to NRC on July 31, 2002.

- Full Scope AST

- Credited the Standby Liquid Control (SLC) system for suppression pool pH control consistent with precedent AST approvals

- Requested elimination of charcoal adsorber filter testing requirements for the Standby Gas Treatment and Control Room Emergency Ventilation filter systems Tony Langley 3

Background LU Supplement (TS 405 SI) to license amendment was submitted to the staff in February 2003.

Additional information concerning the BFN AST license amendment was submitted to the staff in December 2002, and March 2003.

In February 2003, the NRC staff questioned the use of the Standby Liquid Control system, classified as a special safety system, for suppression pool pH control.

TVA met with the NRC staff in April 2003 concerning the use of the SLC system for suppression pool pH control.

Tony Langley 4

Alternative Source Term LuI Regulatory Criteria Regulatory Guide 1.183 Section 5.1.2 "Credit may be taken for accident mitigation features that are classified as safety-related, are required to be operable by technical specifications, are powered by emergency power sources, and are either automatically actuated or, in limited cases, have actuation requirements explicitly addressed in emergency operating procedures. The single active component failure that results in the most limiting radiological consequences should be assumed.

Assumptions regarding the occurrence and timing of a loss of offsite power should be selected with the objective of maximizing the postulated radiological consequences."

Tony Langley 5

Alternative Source Term XU Regulatory criteria 10 CFR 50.2 - Definitions

- Safety-related structures, systems and components means those structures, systems and components that are relied upon to remain functional during and following design basis events to assure:

  • (2) The capability to shut down the reactor and maintain it in a safe shutdown condition; or
  • (3) The capability to prevent or mitigate the consequences of accidents which could result in potential offsite exposures comparable to the applicable guideline exposures set forth in

§50.34(a) (1)or §100. 11 of this chapter, as applicable.

Tony Langley 6

Alternative Source Term I Regulatory Criteria 10 CFR 50 Appendix A General Design Criterion 41 -

Containment Atmosphere Cleanup

  • Systems to control fission products, hydrogen, oxygen, and other substances which may be released into the reactor containment shall be provided as necessary to reduce, consistent with the functioning of other associated systems, the concentration and quality of fission products released to the environment following postulated accidents, and to control the concentration of hydrogen or oxygen and other substances in the containment atmosphere following postulated accidents to assure that containment integrity is maintained. "

"Each system shall have suitable redundancy in components and features, and suitable interconnections, leak detection, isolation, and containment capabilities to assure that for onsite electric power system operation (assuming offsite power is not available) and for offsite electric power system operation (assuming onsite power is not available) its safety function can be accomplished, assuming a single failure."

Tony Langley 7

Standby Liquid Control System Description -

The SLC system is classified as a special safety system.

- as defined in Section 1.2 of the BFN Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), a special safety system is a system the actions of which are essential to a safety action required in response to a special event.

- system is subject to the augmented QA program.

BFN technical specifications require periodic verification of component performance.

System leak testing is perfomed in accordance with ASME section Xl criteria.

The SLC system is composed of redundant injection pumps and injection valves so that at least one pump and associated components assures system availability to perform the injection function.

Jackie Wright 8

Standby Liquid Control System Description Electrical power for the pumps and controls are supplied from different safety-related supplies. A loss of offsite power or a single power failure will not prevent system operation.

Initiation of the SLC system is addressed by the emergency operating procedures.

The system is manually actuated by one keylock switch located on the main control room console. Placing the switch in either "start A" or "start B" position starts the respective pump, opens both explosive valves, and closes the Reactor Water Cleanup system isolation valves.

The system injection flow path is a single line through the containment and into the reactor vessel. The injection line has two containment isolation check valves in series.

Jackie Wright 9

Standby Liquid Control System Description M

STANIW UQUfO CONTROL TANK 10

Proposed Exemption -llIlll

  • 10 CFR 50.12 authorizes the Commission to grant exemptions from the requirements of the regulations provided that:
  • The exemption is authorized by law;

+ The exemption does not present an undue risk to the public health and safety;

  • The requested exemption will not endanger the common defense and security;

Tony Langley 11

Proposed Exemption -

- (ii)"Application of the regulation in the particular circumstances would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule or is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule;...."

The proposed exemption request from 10 CFR 50 Appendix A, Criterion 41 requirements to assume a single failure

  • Control circuitry Tony Langley 12

Content of Proposed Exemption-

  • System Description

- Quality Assurance Program

- SLC Single Failure Evaluation

  • System Reliability

- Maintenance Rule

- Testing And Surveillance

  • Dose Evaluation

- Methodology

- Results

  • Risk Assessment

- SLC System Availability Probability

- System Initiation Probability Tony Langley 13

TVA Actionsn WTVA to submit the exemption request by June 20, 2003

- This will facilitate staff review of the license amendment

- TVA will submit the revision to TS 405 by June 27, 2003 Tony Langley 14

Summary and Conclusion

[AS HANDED -OUT]

Tony Langley 15