ML023470094

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notification of H. B. Robinson Nuclear Plant - Safety System Design and Performance Capability Inspection - NRC Inspection Report 50-261/2003-02
ML023470094
Person / Time
Site: Robinson 
(DPR-023)
Issue date: 12/12/2002
From: Ogle C
NRC/RGN-II/DRS/EB
To: Moyer J
Carolina Power & Light Co
References
IR-03-002
Download: ML023470094 (7)


See also: IR 05000261/2003002

Text

December 12, 2002

Carolina Power & Light Company

ATTN: Mr. J. W. Moyer

Vice President

H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit 2

3581 West Entrance Road

Hartsville, SC 29550

SUBJECT:

NOTIFICATION OF H. B. ROBINSON NUCLEAR PLANT - SAFETY SYSTEM

DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY INSPECTION - NRC

INSPECTION REPORT 50-261/2003-02

Dear Mr. Moyer:

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Region II staff will conduct a safety system design and performance capability inspection at

your H. B. Robinson Nuclear Plant during the weeks of February 24-28, 2003, and March

10 -14, 2003. A team of five inspectors will perform this inspection. The inspection team will be

led by Mr. Robert Schin, a Senior Reactor Inspector from the NRC Region II Office. This

inspection will be conducted in accordance with baseline inspection program Attachment

71111.21, Safety System Design and Performance Capability.

The inspection will evaluate the capability of installed plant equipment to detect and respond to

a steam generator tube rupture event. Procedures which direct the mitigating actions for this

event will also be evaluated.

During a telephone conversation on December 10, 2002, Mr. Schin of my staff, and

Mr. Curt Castell of your staff, confirmed arrangements for an information gathering site visit and

the two-week onsite inspection. The schedule is as follows:

Information gathering visit: Week of January 25, 2003

Onsite inspection: February 24-28, 2003 and March 10-14, 2003.

The purpose of the information gathering visit is to obtain information and documentation

outlined in the Enclosure needed to support the inspection. Mr. Walter Rogers, a

Region II Senior Reactor Analyst, may accompany Mr. Schin during the information gathering

visit to review probabilistic risk assessment data and identify risk significant components which

will be examined during the inspection. Please contact Mr. Schin prior to preparing copies of

the materials listed in the Enclosure. The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative

burden by specifically identifying only those documents required for inspection preparation.

During the information gathering visit, Mr. Schin will also discuss the following inspection

support administrative details: office space; specific documents requested to be made

available to the team in their office space; arrangements for site access; and the availability of

knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during

the inspection.

CP&L

2

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding the

information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Schin (404) 562-4629 or me at (404)

562-4605.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room

or from the Publically Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system

(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA: Walter Rogers for:/

Charles R. Ogle, Chief

Engineering Branch 1

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket No.: 50-261

License No.: DPR-23

Enclosure:

Information Request for the Safety System Design and

Performance Capability Inspection

cc w/encl:

Chris L. Burton

Director, Site Operations

Carolina Power & Light Company

H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant

Electronic Mail Distribution

T. P. Cleary

Plant General Manager

Carolina Power & Light Company

H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant

Electronic Mail Distribution

Terry C. Morton, Manager

Performance Evaluation and

Regulatory Affairs CPB 9

Electronic Mail Distribution

(cc w/encl contd - See page 3

CP&L

3

(cc w/encl contd)

C. T. Baucom, Supervisor

Licensing/Regulatory Programs

Carolina Power & Light Company

H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant

Electronic Mail Distribution

B. L. Fletcher III, Manager

Regulatory Affairs

Carolina Power & Light Company

H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant

Electronic Mail Distribution

Henry J. Porter, Director

Div. of Radioactive Waste Mgmt.

Dept. of Health and Environmental

Control

Electronic Mail Distribution

R. Mike Gandy

Division of Radioactive Waste Mgmt.

S. C. Department of Health and

Environmental Control

Electronic Mail Distribution

Beverly Hall, Acting Director

Division of Radiation Protection

N. C. Department of Environment,

Health and Natural Resources

Electronic Mail Distribution

William D. Johnson

Vice President & Corporate Secretary

Carolina Power & Light Company

Electronic Mail Distribution

John H. O'Neill, Jr.

Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge

2300 N. Street, NW

Washington, DC 20037-1128

Peggy Force

Assistant Attorney General

State of North Carolina

Electronic Mail Distribution

(cc w/encl contd - See page 4)

CP&L

4

(cc w/encl contd)

Robert P. Gruber

Executive Director

Public Staff - NCUC

4326 Mail Service Center

Raleigh, NC 27699-4326

Public Service Commission

State of South Carolina

P. O. Box 11649

Columbia, SC 29211

Distribution w/encl:

R. Subbaratnam, NRR

RIDSNRRDIPMLIPB

PUBLIC

(*) = PER E-MAIL

OFFICE

RII:DRS

RII:DRS

RII:DRP

SIGNATURE

SCHIN

SCHIN FOR *

FREDRICKSON

NAME

RSCHIN

JMOORMAN

PFREDRICKSON

DATE

12/11/2002

12/12/2002

12/12/2002

12/ /2002

12/ /2002

12/ /2002

12/ /2002

E-MAIL COPY?

YES

NO YES

NO YES

NO YES

NO YES

NO YES

NO YES

NO

PUBLIC DOCUMENT

YES

NO

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DOCUMENT NAME: C:\\ORPCheckout\\FileNET\\ML023470094.wpd

Enclosure

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR THE SAFETY SYSTEM DESIGN AND

PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY INSPECTION

STEAM GENERATOR TUBE RUPTURE EVENT

Note: Electronic media is preferred if readily available. (The preferred file format is

searchable .pdf files on CDROM.)

1.

Design basis documents for the engineered safety features used to mitigate the steam

generator tube rupture (SGTR) event. Design basis documents for pressurizer relief

valves, secondary system relief valves, atmospheric dump valves, and turbine bypass

valves. Include performance history of these valves for the past 10 years.

2.

All procedures used to implement the detection and mitigation strategy for the SGTR

event. Include emergency, abnormal, annunciator response, and normal operating

procedures as appropriate.

3.

Procedures used for the operational testing of check valves in portions of the

emergency core cooling systems used during mitigation of the SGTR event.

4.

Surveillance procedures used to ensure the operability of equipment required by your

Technical Specifications that are used during the mitigation of the SGTR event

5.

Summary results of the steam generator (SG) in-service inspection program.

6.

List of temporary modifications and operator work-arounds involving any components

required for detection or mitigation of a SGTR event for the past 3 years

7.

System description and operator training modules for a SGTR event.

8.

List of operating experience program evaluations of industry, vendor, or NRC generic

issues related to a SGTR event.

9.

Procedures used to sample the reactor coolant system during a SG tube leak or SGTR

event.

10.

Calibration and functional testing procedures for the main steam line radiation

monitoring instrumentation used to detect and mitigate a SGTR event.

11.

Calculations used to support the set points in Emergency Operating Procedures for a

SGTR event.

12.

Performance history of valves or support equipment used to isolate SGs in the event of

a tube rupture.

13.

Calibration and functional test procedures of instruments used to monitor reactor coolant

system (RCS) pressure, pressurizer level and pressure, SG level and pressure, RDS hot

and cold leg temperature, RCS subcooling monitor, feedwater flow, steam flow, core exit

temperature, high pressure injection (HPI) flow, low pressure injection flow, refueling

2

Enclosure

water storage tank level, pressurized heater status, safety relief valve position indicator,

auxiliary feedwater flow (AFW) flow, condensate storage tank (CST) level, makeup flow,

and letdown flow.

14.

P&IDs for RCS, HPI, SI, AFW, chemical and volume control system, main steam, and

electrical distribution system. (Paper copies are preferred for these)

15.

Electrical schematic showing start circuit for the AFW pumps. (Paper copies are

preferred for these)

16.

Test procedures for the primary and secondary system safety relief valves including any

position indications and code safety valves.

17.

Loop uncertainly calculations for SG level, pressurizer pressure and level, and RCS

pressure.

18.

Test procedures for any defeat switches associated with AFW starting logic.

19.

Instrument loop diagrams for items identified in Number 13 above. (Paper copies are

preferred for these)

20.

Probability Risk Assessment (PRA) Event tree for a SGTR event. A list of PRA

identified system dependencies and success criteria for systems used to mitigate a

steam generator tube rupture.

21.

System health reports and all performance monitoring information for systems used to

detect and mitigate a SGTR event.

22.

A list of Action Reports and non-routine work requests initiated since 1998 affecting the

systems used to detect and mitigate a SGTR event.

23.

Maintenance Rule performance criteria for systems used to detect and mitigate a SGTR

event. A list of maintenance rule failures of equipment used to detect or mitigate a

SGTR event.

24.

Key electrical single line diagrams of the alternating current and direct current power

systems that provide power for the pumps, valves, and instrumentation and control

circuits associated with the systems that accomplish the SGTR mitigation strategy.

(Paper copies are preferred for these)

25.

Provide a list of equipment used to mitigate a SGTR that changes state or is manually

manipulated during implementation of the SGTR mitigation strategy. Provide equipment

failure rates over the past 10 years for these components.