ML022460439
| ML022460439 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 08/23/2002 |
| From: | Document Control Desk |
| To: | Susquehanna |
| References | |
| EP-PS-242 | |
| Download: ML022460439 (8) | |
Text
Auq- 23, 2002
- Page 1 of 1 MANUAL HARD COPY DISTRIBUTION DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL 2002-39 8 USER INFORMATION:
FLAIMILAUUEL B EMPL#:23244 CA#: 0363 Phone#: 254-3658 TRANSMITTAL INFORMATION:
- -PO.11*1LAUHi B 08/23/2002 LOCATION: DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK FROM: NUCLEAR RECORDS DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER (NUCSA-2)
"y>THE FOLLOWING CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED TO THE HARDCOPY OR ELECTRONIC MANUAL ASSIGNED TO YOU:
242 - 242 - LIAISON SUPPORT SUPERVISOR REMOVE MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 08/08/2002 ADD MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 08/22/2002 CATEGORY: PROCEDURES TYPE: EP ID: EP-PS-242 REPLACE: REV:1 REPLACE: REV:1 UPDATES FOR HARD COPY MANUALS WILL BE DISTRIBUTED WITHIN 5 DAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES. PLEASE MAKE ALL CHANGES AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX UPON RECEIPT OF HARD COPY. FOR ELECTRONIC MANUAL USERS, ELECTRONICALLY REVIEW THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX.
TAB 5 EP-PS-242-5 PAR AIRBORNE RELEASES NOTES:
- 1. PA-4 CAN BE USED TO REFER TO SECTION 4.1 OF THE PROCEDURE FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION ON THE ACTION TO BE TAKEN.
- 2. DOSE PROJECTIONS DO NOT INCLUDE DOSE ALREADY RECEIVED
- 3. TEDE - WHOLE BODY (TEDE) IS THE SUM OF EFFECTIVE DOSE EQUIVALENT RESULTING FROM EXPOSURE TO EXTERNAL SOURCES. THE COMMITTED EFFECTIVE DOSE EQUIVALENT (CEDE) FROM ALL SIGNIFICANT INHALATION PATHWAYS AND THE DOSE DUE TO GROUND DEPOSITION.
- 4. CDE - COMMITTED DOSE EQUIVALENT TO THE CHILD THYROID.
EP-AD-000-126, Revision 9, Page 1 of 6
TAB 5 EP-PS-242-5 PAR LIQUID RELEASES ENTRY:
INDICATIONS OF A POTENTIAL LIQUID RELEASE
- UNISOLABLE RADWASTE TANK RELEASE
- LEAK TO COOLING TOWER BASIN
- LEAK TO SPRAY POND PL-1 Isotopic Limit ENSURE CHEM/ESD RADIONUCLIDE (uCi/ml) TAKES AND ANALYZES Ag-11Om 1.1E-6 SAMPLES As-76 7.2E-7 L-2 Ba-140 1.1 E-6 Ce-1 41 3.6E-6 Co-58 1.1 E-4 ENo--+ O ACTION CONTINUE Co-60 1.2E-6 REQUIREMENTS (AT REQUIRED MONITORING Cr-51 7.2E75 PL-3 ELAEPON)
Cs-134 2.4E4 Cs-137 2.4E6 Fe-55 2.4E 5 Yes Fe-59 2.4E6 H-3 2.4E4 RAD PERSONNEL 1-129 1.2E-8 NOTIFY DANVILLE AND 1-131 3.6E-8 BRP THAT A RELEASE La-1 40 7.2E*7 HAS OCCURRED Mn-54 3.6E-6 r-L-4 Mo-99 7.2E-6 I Na-22 4.8E-6 CHEM/FTD EVALUATES Nb-95 3.6E-6 RELEASE vs PAG Ni-59 3.6E*6 Ni-63 P-32 6.0E"7 3.6E-7 PL-5 4.
Ru-1 03 2.4E 6 Ru-1 06 3.6E-7 /,Db~ES RELEASE EXCEkI RAD PERSONNEL Sb-124 7.2E"7 ANY OF THE TABLE UIMI`
OR DOES THE SUM OF >-No NOTIFY DANVILLE Sb-1 25 3.6E-6 FRACTIONS EXCEED 1.01 THAT NO PAR IS Sr-89 2.4E 7 K DANVILLE? ,
REQUIRED Sr-90 9.6E"8 PL-8 Tc-99m 1.1 E,5 Y-90 7.2E-7 Zn-65 3.6E-6 Yes Zr-95 2.4E6 RAD PERSONNEL NOTIFY DEPIBRP FOR DANVILLE TO DIVERT DRINKING WATER SUPPLY & ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL OF RELEASE AT DANVILLE PL-7 NOTES:
- 1. PL-# CAN BE USED TO REFER TO SECTION 4.2 OF THE PROCEDURE FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION ON THE ACTION TO BE TAKEN.
- 2. CALLS TO DANVILLE ARE COURTESY INFORMATION CALLS ONLY. PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION CALLS MUST BE MADE BY DEPIBRP.
EP-AD-000-126, Revision 9, Page 2 of 6
TAB 5 EP-PS-242-5 PUBLIC PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION GUIDE AIRBORNE RELEASES 0 PA-1 MONITOR CONDITIONS FOR PAR APPLICATION The following conditions should be continuously evaluated to determine if a PAR should be implemented or changed:
"* Plant status and prognosis for changes in conditions
"* Onsite radiological conditions
"* Status of actual or potential radioactive releases
"* Offsite dose projections or actual offsite radiological conditions
"* Escalation in Emergency Classification (i.e., General)
(Go to PA-2)
PA-2 HAS A GENERAL EMERGENCY BEEN DECLARED?
E- YES - If a GENERAL EMERGENCY has been declared, a PAR must be made within 15 minutes of the emergency declaration. The PAR requirement is found in "NUREG-0654. (Go to PA-3)
E3 NO - Ilf.a GENERAL EMERGENCY has not been declared, continue to monitor plant status, parameter trends, and prognosis for termination -or escalation of the event. (Go to PA-1)
PA-3 IS THERE A VALID DOSE PROJECTION INDICATING DOSES OF > 1 REM TEDE OR>
5 REM CDE CHILD THYROID AT A DISTANCE OF
> 2 MILES?
El YES - If the projected doses at 2 miles are _>1 REM TEDE or >_5 REM CDE child thyroid, then full evacuation (0-10 miles) is recommended.
(Go to PA-5)
E3 NOIUNKNOWN - (Go to PA-4)
EP-AD-000-126, Revision 9, Page 3 of 6
TAB 5 EP-PS-242-5 0 PA-4 RECOMMEND EVACUATION 0-2 MILES; SHELTER 2-10 MILES Limited Evacuation (0-2 miles) and sheltering is appropriate for events that are significant enough to cause a General Emergency classification and dose projections are low, unknown, or below full evacuation guidelines.
0 PA-5 EVACUATE 0-10 MILES Full evacuation of members of the general public is recommended at this point based on the emergency classification and dose projections.
EP-AD-000-126, Revision 9, Page 4 of 6
TAB 5 EP-PS-242-5 LIQUID
PL-1 ENTRY This section is entered when there are indications of a potential radioactive liquid release.
Indications of potential releases include:
"* an unisolable radwaste tank release.
"* leaks to cooling tower basin
"* leak to spray pond (Go to PL-2) 0 PL-2 CHEMISTRY/ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING DIRECTOR (ESD) TAKES AND ANALYZES SAMPLE (Go to PL-3)
PL-3 IS RELEASE _ TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS LIMITS (AT THE RELEASE POINT)?
El YES - Releases are at or greater than Technical Requirements limits when Chemistry determines that the limits are exceeded based on methodologies described in the ODCM and applicable Chemistry procedures.
El NO - If the release is < Technical Requirements limits, then no notifications are required and monitoring should continue.
(Go to PL-4)
El PL-4 RAD PERSONNEL NOTIFY DANVILLE AND BRP THAT A RELEASE HAS OCCURRED Depending on which facility is activated, the notification to Danville and BRP will be made by the RPC (TSC) or the Radiological Liaison (EOF).
DO NOT MAKE ANY PROTECTIVE ACTIONS RECOMMENDATIONS AT THIS TIME.
EP-AD-000-126, Revision 9, Page 5 of 6
TAB 5 "EP-PS-242-5 r- PL-5 CHEM/FTD EVALUATES RELEASE VERSUS PAGs The results of the sample analysis are compared to the PAGs for radionuclides in drinking water. The analysis calculates the expected concentration at Danville, taking into account the dilution afforded by the river.
PL-6 DOES RELEASE EXCEED PAGs (AT DANVILLE)?
El YES - Ifa single isotope exceeds the PAG or the sum of the fractions exceeds 1.0, then a protective action recommendation should be made for Danville to DIVERT its DRINKING WATER supply to a backup supply until the release has passed.
(Go to PL-7)
El NO - Ifthe PAGs are not exceeded, monitoring should continue and the State should be notified that no PAR for the liquid release is required. (Go to PL-8)
El PL-7 RAD PERSONNEL NOTIFY DEP/BRP OF PAR Depending on which facility is activated, the PAR notification to DEP/BRP will be made by the RPC (TSC) or the Radiological Liaison (EOF). The PAR FORM shall be used to document the PAR.
DO NOT COMMUNICATE THE PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION TO DANVILLE. THE DEP/BRP IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS COMMUNICATION.
E PL-8 RAD PERSONNEL NOTIFY DEP/BRP No PAR is required. Depending on which facility is activated, the RPC (TSC) or the Radiological Liaison (EOF) shall notify DEP/BRP that no PAR is required.
EP-AD-000-126, Revision 9, Page 6 of 6