ML022460414

Revision 15 to EP-PS-104, Radiation Protection Coordinator (Rpc): Emergency Plan - Position Specific Procedure.

ML022460414
Person / Time
Site:	Susquehanna
Issue date:	08/23/2002
From:	Susquehanna
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
EP-PS-104
Download: ML022460414 (21)

Text

Aug. 23, 2002 Page 1 of 1 MANUAL HARD COPY DISTRIBUTION DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL 2002-392 5 USER INFORMATION:

AILU EMPL#:23244 CA#: 0363 A~dff-sns--N-UeSr Phone#: 254-3658 TRANSMITTAL INFORMATION:

T . -*oB 08/23/2002 LOCATION: DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK FROM: NUCLEAR RECORDS DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER

'NUCSA-2)

,HE FOLLOWING CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED TO THE HARDCOPY O-6R ELECTRONIC MANUAL ASSIGNED TO YOU:

104 - 104 - RADIATION PROTECTION COORDINATOR (RPC):

EMERGENCY PLSN-POSITION SPECIFIC PROCEDURE REMOVE MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 08/08/2002 ADD MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 08/22/2002 CATEGORY: PROCEDURES TYPE: EP ID: EP-PS-104 REMOVE: REV:14 ADD: REV: 15 REMOVE: PCAF 2002-1439 REV: N/A UPDATES FOR HARD COPY MANUALS WILL BE DISTRIBUTED WITHIN 5 DAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES. PLEASE MAKE ALL CHANGES AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX UPON RECEIPT OF HARD COPY. FOR ELECTRONIC MANUAL USERS, ELECTRONICALLY REVIEW THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX.

PROCEDURE COVER SHEET PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE RADIATION PROTECTION COORDINATOR: EP-PS-104 Emergency Plan-Position Specific Procedure Revision 15 Page 1 of 4 QUALITY CLASSIFICATION: APPROVAL CLASSIFICATION:

QA Program (X) Non-QA Program ( ) Plant -l, ,/ ( Non-Plant (X )*e!,lnstru tioný,,

EFFECTIVE DAE', ~$ IMOdi 40M PERIODIC REVIEW FREQUENCY: 2 Years PERIODIC REVIEW DUE ,DATE:

RECOMMENDED REVIEWS: <

All Procedure Cner: Nuclear Emergency Planning Responsible Supervisor: Radiation Protection Manager Responsible FUM: Supv.-Nuclear Emergency Planning Responsible Approver: Vice President-Nuclear Operations FORM NDAP-QA-0002-1, Rev. 3, Page 1 of 1

EP-PS-1 04 Revision 15 Page 2 of 4 RADIATION PROTECTION COORDINATOR (RPC): Emergency Plan-Position Specific Procedure WHEN: Technical Support Center (TSC) is activated HOW NOTIFIED: Paged, phone backup REPORT TO: TSC Emergency Director WHERE TO REPORT: TSC OVERALL DUTY:

Quantify and assess radiological conditions both on- and off-site, then recommend emergency classification and protective actions.

MAJOR TASKS: TAB: REVISION:

Obtain briefing on the emergency. TAB A 2 Activate TSC Health Physics group and, if TAB B 4 needed, request EOF activation.

Make sure initial habitability is assessed. TAB C 7 Take inventory of information required to TAB D 4 analyze the radiological situation.

Brief Emergency Director in the TSC on what TAB E 1 you know about radiological conditions and Health Physics staff.

Assess emergency classification and confirm TAB F 4 or recommend changes to the Emergency Director.

Assess and recommend protective actions to TAB G 9 the Emergency Director.

Communicate with DEP/BRP. TAB H 4 Continue assessing radiological situation, TAB I 7 updating Emergency Director, TSC staff, and Health Physics staff.

Evaluate and approve emergency exposure TAB J 1 extensions.

EP-PS-1 04 Revision 15 Page 3 of 4 MAJOR TASKS: TAB: REVISION:

Manage turn over to the next shift. TAB K 0 Manage vehicle decontamination. TAB L 1 Transfer Back Calculations, and responsibility TAB M 3 for DEPIBRP communications to the EOF.

EP-PS-104 Revision 15 Page 4 of 4 SUPPORTING INFORMATION: TAB:

Emergency Telephone Instructions TAB 1 Emergency Organization TAB 2 Response Levels for Protection Action Guides TAB 3 SSES Contamination Response Plan TAB 4 Emergency Facility Form Flow TAB 5 Emergency Classification TAB 6 Public Protective Action Recommendation Guide TAB 7 PPL Emergency Personnel Dose Assessment and TAB 8 Protective Action Recommendation (PAR) Guide TSC Rad Staff Responsibilities TAB 9 Personnel Accountability TAB 10 Emergency Exposure Extensions TAB 11 Emergency Forms TAB 12 0 Protective Action Recommendation Form 0 Emergency Exposure Extension Request Intentionally Blank TAB 13 Liquid Discharge Data Sheets TAB 14 PPL Radiological Representation/Participation in TAB 15 FRMAC

REFERENCES:

SSES Emergency Plan NUREG-0654, Planning Standards and Evaluation Criteria NUREG-0731, Guidelines for Utility Management Structure and Technical Resources, September 1980 SP-00-308, Emergency Medical Response

TAB I EP-PS-1 04-1 Revision 7 Page 1 of 2 MAJOR TASK:

Continue assessing radiological situation, updating Emergency Director, TSC staff, and Health Physics staff.

SPECIFIC TASKS: HOW:

1. Attend TSC briefing and provide 1a. Give the status of the following items at radiological status. the briefing:

(1) Current radiological release status and Dose Projections.

(2) Current and forecast weather conditions.

(3) Oscar locations, current radiological information, and Real Time Monitoring System data.

(4) In-plant radiological conditions.

(5) Protective action(s) implemented or under consideration.

2. Periodically brief Health Physics staff HELP and receive updates from them. TSC Rad Staff Responsibilities See TAB 9

3. Perform frequent on-going assessment of radiological situation both offsite and onsite.

4. Periodically perform general HP 4a. Verify form flows, board is being operation assessment. maintained, contamination controls in place, and that staffing is adequate.

5. Provide information to Ops 5a. Notify Operations Coordinator if doses Coordinator on rad releases and are projected to exceed I rem TEDE or projected doses to the public for use 5 rem Thyroid CDE. Control Room by Control Room personnel. needs radiological data to evaluate entry conditions and action levels for EOP procedures. These procedures require operator actions such as rapid depressurization based on projected doses.

TAB I EP-PS-1 04-1 Revision 7 Page 2 of 2 SPECIFIC TASKS: HOW:

NOTE:

These procedures also require that projected doses be determined when containment venting is needed.

5b. Discuss projection time with Ops Coordinator. (This may differ from the default projection time being used in the dose projection model.) Consider the following:

(1) Prognosis of event.

(2) Time to cooldown to <200 deg.

(3) Duration & type of release.

(4) Weather forecasts.

(5) Protective measures already implemented.

(6) Release pathway - possible filtration and/or monitoring.

6. Continue to evaluate the current PAR and recommend revising the PAR to the Emergency Director based on increasing dose levels.

TAB G EP-PS-104-G Revision 9 Page 1 of 3 MAJOR TASK:

Assess and recommend protective actions to the Emergency Director.

SPECIFIC TASKS: HOW:

1. Assess radiological status of plant HELP and releases. SSES Contamination Response Plan See TAB 4 HELP Public Protective Action Recommendation Guide See TAB 7

2. If a liquid release has occurred which HELP exceeds Technical Requirements I Manual Limits, notify the Danville Water Authority, Public Information Liquid Discharge Data Sheets See TAB 14 Manager and DEP/BRP.

NOTE:

Do not make any protective action recommendations directly to the Danville Water Authority.

3. If a liquid release has occurred for which the total PAG fraction exceeds 1.0, recommend protective actions for drinking water.

4. Evaluate protective action 4a. In evaluating protective actions, consider:

alternatives. (1) Reducing projected release time based on weather conditions, total inventory, or damage control measures.

(2) Do not react on one piece of information until it can be verified to be correct.

(3) Impact of liquid releases on Danville Water Authority.

TAB G EP-PS-1 04-G Revision 9 Page 2 of 3 SPECIFIC TASKS: HOW:

4b. When a Site Evacuation is initiated, discuss notification of the Learning Center and occupied buildings in the Exclusion Zone with the Security Coordinator and Emergency Director.

(1) Building to be notified, if occupied, are:

SSES Learning Center Access Processing Facility Warehouse #2 500 KV Switchyard SSES Garage (2) Consider sending extra staff, (example: Chemistry Tech, Maintenance, Operations or OSCAR), with a bull horn, to notify these facilities of Site Evacuation.

NOTE:

Two bull horns are located in the Security Coordinator's desk. One is located in the OSCAR van.

4c. Upon call for a site evacuation, discuss notification of personnel inside the Emergency Planning Boundary.

(1) Dispatch an individual with a bull horn and vehicle to traverse the Emergency Planning Boundary announcing, "Attention all personnel, an evacuation of PPL property has been ordered and you are requested to leave immediately."

NOTE:

Two bull horns are located in the Security Coordinator's desk.

Another is available in the "OSCAR" van.

TAB G EP-PS-1 04-G Revision 9 Page 3 of 3 SPECIFIC TASKS: HOW:

(2) Consider using 'extra' staff, (Chem. Tech, Maintenance, or Ops personnel, OSCAR, if available), to support this activity.

Copies of maps outlining the Emergency Planning Boundary are available in the Radiation Protection Coordinator's desk.

5. Recommend changes in protective action.

6. Assess if a protective action 6a. Perform dose projection estimates for recommendation beyond 10 miles is distances greater than 10 miles.

appropriate.

6b. Consult with Operations and Technical Support Coordinator to verify that dose projections are consistent with plant conditions.

6c. Insure that PAR's have been made for distances up to 10 miles.

6d. Recommend a PAR rounding up the distance to the nearest 5 mile increment until dose projections are less than 1 REM TEDE or 5 REM TEDE.

TAB C EP-PS-1 04-C Revision 7 Page 1 of 2 MAJOR TASK:

Make sure initial habitability is assessed.

SPECIFIC TASKS: HOW:

1. Check that initial habitability is la. Upon TSC activation, assess habitability assessed in the TSC, Control based on:

Structure, Chem Lab In-plant Team Staging Area and (1) CREOASS rad and chlorine Accountability Areas. monitors.

NOTE:

Chem Lab ventilation has no filters or recirculation system for airbornelchlorine protection.

(2) TSC rad Conditions.

(3) In-plant ARM/CAMS.

(4) SPING and wind direction.

2. See that initial habitability is 2a. Consider habitability at other inhabited assessed at other inhabited areas such as:

areas if warranted by radiological conditions. (1) North Gate house.

(2) South Gate house.

(3) West Building.

(4) Energy Information Center.

(5) Nuclear Learning Center.

(6) Ecology Ill.

(7) White House.

(8) Sewage Treatment Plant.

(9) Access Processing Facility.

(10) Peach Stand.

(11) Vehicle Maintenance Shed.

(12) Security Firing Range.

2b. Provide guidance as needed.

TAB C EP-PS-1 04-C Revision 7 Page 2 of 2 SPECIFIC TASKS: HOW:

2c. Consider both radiological and non-radiological, (for example, chlorine),

conditions.

2d. Consider mobilizing (remote) ARM's or CAM's to onsite habitability areas.

HELP Personnel Accountability See TAB 10

3. When required, check habitability of 3a. Assess habitability of the offsite lab when the Offsite Chemistry Lab located in notified by chemistry that samples from the West Building. the site are to be taken there for analysis.

TAB 12 EP-PS-1 04-12 Affected Unit Control No.

PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION FORM SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 0 This is a Drill 0 This is NOT a Drill Preparer:

The EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION is:

03 Unusual Event 0 Alert 0 Site Area Emergency 0 General Emergency Basis: EAL #

This represents:

O Initial Classification 0 Escalation 03 Reduction E3 No Change in the Classification Status Emergency Action(s) implemented onsite:

_ 0 None E3 Evacuation of non-essential personnel 0 Local Area Evacuation 0 KI to onsite personnel

[o Site Accountability 0 Other Bases:

The PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION is:

O No Protective Action Recommendation Required O3 Evacuate 0-2 miles and Shelter 2-10 miles 0 Relocation O1 Evacuate 0-10 miles 0 Control of Access 0 Contamination Controls/Decon O Divert Danville Drinking Water* 0 Other

• Expected arrival of release at Danville:

This represents: 0 Initial 01 Change 0 No Change in the Protective Action Recommendation EP-AD-000-1 10, Revision 7, Page 1 of 2 (duplex)

TAB 12 EP-PS-1 04-12 The BASIS for the Protective Action Recommendation is:

Plant Status Radioactive Release: 01 Monitored 0 Unmonitored Status Airborne I Liquid

< Tech Requirements Limit (Routine) 0 0]

> Tech Requirements Limit (Event Related) 0 0]

Note: TRM Limits (.Ci/min): Noble Gas 8.51 E+5; Iodine 1.04E+2; Particulate 7.72 E+2 (Airborne releases)

Data measured in the field confirm release rate estimations: 0 Yes 0 No Weather Conditions: Wind Speed Wind Direction Dose Projections: 0 TEDE > 1 rem or thyroid CDE > 5 rem at 2 miles "o TEDE > 1 rem or thyroid CDE > 5 rem at EPB "o TEDE <1 rem and thyroid CDE <5 rem at EPB Other:

Approval: Date/Time:

Emergency Director or Recovery Manager approval required if change in Classification or Protective Action Recommendation.

RPC or DASU approval if no change in the Classification or Protective Action Recommendation.

Transmittal: 0 Verbal 0 Electronic 0 Both Communicated To:

NAME AGENCY DATE/TIME EP-AD-000-1 10, Revision 7, Page 2 of 2 (duplex)

TAB 7 EP-PS-1 04-7 PAR AIRBORNE RELEASES MONITOR CONDITIONS:

- PLANT STATUS/PROCEDURES

- ONSITE RAD CONDITIONS

- STATUS OF RELEASE

- DOSE PROJECTIONS NOTES:

1. PA-# CAN BE USED TO REFER TO SECTION 4.1 OFTHE PROCEDURE FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION ON THE ACTION TO BE TAKEN.

2. DOSE PROJECTIONS DO NOT INCLUDE DOSE ALREADY RECEIVED.

3. TEDE - WHOLE BODY (TEDE) IS THE SUM OF EFFECTIVE DOSE EQUIVALENT RESULTING FROM EXPOSURE TO EXTERNAL SOURCES. THE COMMITrED EFFECTIVE DOSE EQUIVALENT (CEDE) FROM ALL SIGNIFICANT INHALATION PATHWAYS AND THE DOSE DUE TO GROUND DEPOSITION.

4. CDE - COMMrITED DOSE EQUIVALENT TO THE CHILD THYROID.

EP-AD-000-126, Revision 9, Page 1 of 6

TAB 7 EP-PS-104-7 PAR LIQUID RELEASES ENTRY:

INDICATIONS OF A POTENTIAL UQUID RELEASE

- UNISOLABLE RADWASTE TANK RELEASE

- LEAK TO COOLING TOWER BASIN

- LEAK TO SPRAY POND PL-1 Isotopic Limit ENSURE CHEM/ESD RADIONUCLIDE (uCi/ml) TAKES AND ANALYZES Ag-110m 1.1 E-6 SAMPLES As-76 7.2E"7 PL-2 Ba-140 1.1E-6 Ce-141 3.6E-6 Co-58 1.1 E4 EsNO ACON CONTINUE Co-60 1.2E-6 REQUIREMENTS (AT REQUIRED MONITORING Cr-51 7.2E-5 Cs-1 34 2.4E 4 Cs-1 37 2.4E Fe-55 2.4E 5 Fe-59 2.4E 6 H-3 2.4E4 RAD PERSONNEL 1-129 1.2E"8 NOTIFY DANVILLE AND 1-131 3.6E's BRP THAT A RELEASE La-140 7.2E-7 HAS OCCURRED Mn-54 3.6E-6 PL-4 I1 Mo-99 7.2E-6 Na-22 4.8E-6 CHEM/FTD EVALUATES Nb-95 3.6E-6 RELEASE vs PAG Ni-59 3.6E*6 6.0E"7 PL-5 Ni-63 P-32 3.6E"7 Ru-1 03 2.4E 6 Ru-1 06 3.6E"7

,DES RELEASE EXCEMD RAD PERSONNEL 7.2E"7 ANY OF THE TABLE LIMITE Sb-124 OR DOES THE SUM OF

>- No NOTIFY DANVILLE Sb-1 25 3.6E-6 FRACTIONS EXCEED 1.0 Al T-THAT NO PAR IS Sr-89 2.4E 7 SDANVILLE? z REQUIRED Sr-90 9.6E"8 PL-8 Tc-99m 1.1 E*5 Y-90 7.2E-7 T Yes' Zn-65 3.6E-6 Zr-95 2.4E6 RAD PERSONNEL NOTIFY DEP/BRP FOR DANVILLE TO DIVERT DRINKING WATER SUPPLY & ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL OF RELEASE AT DANVILLE I-L- 7 NOTES:

1. PL-# CAN BE USED TO REFER TO SECTION 4.2 OF THE PROCEDURE FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION ON THE ACTION TO BE TAKEN.

2. CALLS TO DANVILLE ARE COURTESY INFORMATION CALLS ONLY. PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION CALLS MUST BE MADE BY DEPIBRP.

EP-AD-000-126, Revision 9, Page 2 of 6

TAB 7 EP-PS-1 04-7 PUBLIC PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION GUIDE "AIRBORNE RELEASES El PA-1 MONITOR CONDITIONS FOR PAR APPLICATION The following conditions should be continuously evaluated to determine if a PAR should be implemented or changed:

"* Plant status and prognosis for changes in conditions

"* Onsite radiological conditions

"* Status of actual or potential radioactive releases

"* Offsite dose projections or actual offsite radiological conditions

"* Escalation in Emergency Classification (i.e., General)

(Go to PA-2)

PA-2 HAS A GENERAL EMERGENCY BEEN DECLARED?

0l YES - Ifa GENERAL EMERGENCY has been declared, a PAR must be made within 15 minutes of the emergency declaration. The PAR requirement is found in NUREG-0654. (Go to PA-3)

El NO - If-a GENERAL EMERGENCY has not been declared, continue to monitor plant status, parameter trends, and prognosis for termination -orescalation of the event. (Go to PA-1)

PA-3 IS THERE A VALID DOSE PROJECTION INDICATING DOSES OF _> 1 REM TEDE OR>

5 REM CDE CHILD THYROID AT A DISTANCE OF

> 2 MILES?

El YES - If the projected doses at 2 miles are _ 1 REM TEDE or > 5 REM CDE child thyroid, then full evacuation (0-10 miles) is recommended.

(Go to PA-5) 0l NO/UNKNOWN - (Go to PA-4)

EP-AD-000-126, Revision 9, Page 3 of 6

TAB 7 EP-PS-1 04-7 0 PA-4 RECOMMEND EVACUATION 0-2 MILES; SHELTER 2-10 MILES Limited Evacuation (0-2 miles) and sheltering is appropriate for events that are significant enough to cause a General Emergency classification and dose projections are low, unknown, or below full evacuation guidelines.

0 PA-5 EVACUATE 0-10 MILES Full evacuation of members of the general public is recommended at this point based on the emergency classification and dose projections.

EP-AD-000-126, Revision 9, Page 4 of 6

TAB 7 EP-PS-1 04-7 LIQUID "0 PL-1 ENTRY This section is entered when there are indications of a potential radioactive liquid release.

Indications of potential releases include:

"* an unisolable radwaste tank release.

"* leaks to cooling tower basin

"* leak to spray pond (Go to PL-2)

E- PL-2 CHEMISTRY/ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING DIRECTOR (ESD) TAKES AND ANALYZES SAMPLE (Go to PL-3)

PL-3 IS RELEASE _>TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS "LIMITS(AT THE RELEASE POINT)?

o YES - Releases are at or greater than Technical Requirements limits when Chemistry determines that the limits are exceeded based on methodologies described in the ODCM and applicable Chemistry procedures.

01 NO - Ifthe release is < Technical Requirements limits, then no notifications are required and monitoring should continue.

(Go to PL-4) o PL-4 RAD PERSONNEL NOTIFY DANVILLE AND BRP THAT A RELEASE HAS OCCURRED Depending on which facility is activated, the notification to Danville and BRP will be made by the RPC (TSC) or the Radiological Liaison (EOF).

DO NOT MAKE ANY PROTECTIVE ACTIONS RECOMMENDATIONS AT THIS TIME.

EP-AD-000-126, Revision 9, Page 5 of 6

TAB 7 EP-PS-1 04-7 D PL-5 CHEM/FTD EVALUATES RELEASE VERSUS PAGs The results of the sample analysis are compared to the PAGs for radionuclides in drinking water. The analysis calculates the expected concentration at Danville, taking into account the dilution afforded by the river.

PL-6 DOES RELEASE EXCEED PAGs (AT DANVILLE)?

El YES - If a single isotope exceeds the PAG or the sum of the fractions exceeds 1.0, then a protective action recommendation should be made for Danville to DIVERT its DRINKING WATER supply to a backup supply until the release has passed.

(Go to PL-7) 0 NO - If the PAGs are not exceeded, monitoring should continue and the State should be notified that no PAR for the liquid release is required. (Go to PL-8)

"O PL-7 RAD PERSONNEL NOTIFY DEP/BRP OF PAR Depending on which facility is activated, the PAR notification to DEP/BRP will be made by the RPC (TSC) or the Radiological Liaison (EOF). The PAR FORM shall "beused to document the PAR.

DO NOT COMMUNICATE THE PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION TO DANVILLE. THE DEPIBRP IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS COMMUNICATION.

"D PL-8 RAD PERSONNEL NOTIFY DEP/BRP No PAR is required. Depending on which facility is activated, the RPC (TSC) or the Radiological Liaison (EOF) shall notify DEP/BRP that no PAR is required.

EP-AD-000-126, Revision 9, Page 6 of 6