ML021280292
| ML021280292 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 04/30/2002 |
| From: | Mckinney B Wolf Creek |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| WO 02-0024 | |
| Download: ML021280292 (89) | |
Text
W LF CREEK
'NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION Britt T. McKinney Vice President Operations APR 3 0 2002 WO 02-0024 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Docket No. 50-482: 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Gentlemen:
The enclosure contains the 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, which is being submitted pursuant to Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS) Technical Specification 5.6.2. This report covers operation of WCGS for the period of January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001.
Attachments I and II contain changes to Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports covering years 1999 and 2000, respectively.
No commitments are identified in this correspondence. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at (620) 364-4112, or Mr. Tony Harris at (620) 364-4038.
Very truly yours, Britt T. McKinney BTM/krp Attachment I - Changes to the 1999 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment II - Changes to the 2000 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report cc: J. N. Donohew (NRC), w/a, w/e D. N. Graves (NRC), w/a, w/e E. W. Merschoff (NRC), w/a, w/e Senior Resident Inspector (NRC), wla, W/e P.O. Box 411 / Burlington, KS 66839 / Phone: (620) 364-8831 An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/HC/VET
Attachment I to WO 02-0024 Page 1 of 4 Attachment I Replacement pages to the 1999 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (Reference WCNOC Letter to NRC, CO 00-0027, dated April 28, 2000)
Attachment I to WO 02-0024 Page 2 of 4 Figure 13 illustrates that Cs-137 activity was detected pre-operationally and is routinely detected at the discharge cove.
However, Cs-137 activity was not detected in discharge cove samples in 1997.
A linear trendline indicates that the level of Cs-137 activity detected in the discharge cove is trending downward.
Analysis results are summarized in Table 9.
D.
Ingestion Pathway (1)
Milk Milk was not collected during the sample year since no indicator locations within five miles of the plant were identified during the Land Use Census.
(2)
Food and Garden Crops Gamma analyses of broadleaf vegetation samples during 1999 detected naturally occurring gamma emitters Be-7, K-40 and Th-228.
Cs-137 activity was detected (12.4 pCi/kg) in a sample from indicator location F-I.
This detected activity was not considered to be due to plant operation since it was below the range of pre-operational Cs-137 results (13.1 to 47.8 pCi/kg).
NOTE: The pre-operational Cs-137 results (13.1 to 47.8 pCi/kg) for broadleaf vegetation samples were decay corrected.
The decay corrected pre operational range is 9.1 to 34.2 pCi/kg.
The measured Cs-137 activity of the horseradish leaves sampled on 05-27-1999 was 12.4 +/-
6.9 pCi/kg, wet, which is within the decay corrected pre-operational range.
Cs-137 activity was not detected in air samples collected during 1999.
The measured Cs-137 activity of the horseradish leaves was likely due to previous fallout and not to a
recently produced fission product associated with plant operation.
Activity attributable to plant operation was not detected.
Table 11 shows the results of 1999 analyses.
In addition to broadleaf vegetation, crop samples were collected.
One control sample was obtained from cropland upstream of the confluence of Wolf Creek and the Neosho River, and three indicator samples were obtained downstream.
The control sample location was irrigated with Neosho River water.
Due to the wet
- summer, only one indicator sample location was irrigated with Neosho River water.
Gamma analysis detected naturally occurring K-40 to be present in all of the samples, with no nuclides detected due to plant operation.
Results of crop analyses are summarized in Table 12.
No unusual trends were noted.
(3)
Fish Analysis results are illustrated in Table
- 13.
Naturally occurring K-40 activity was detected in all fish samples and was within the range seen during the pre-operational monitoring period.
1999 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 8 of 49
Attachment I to WO 02-0024 Page 3 of 4 During 1999, fish were also analyzed for tritium.
All fish samples taken from WCL had tritium activity detected (6,020 pCi/kg annual mean),
and those results are displayed in Figure
- 14.
The detected tritium activity was attributable to plant operation.
An adult consuming 21 kilograms of fish, at the maximum measured tritium concentration for 1999 (11,000 pCi/kg) would receive a committed effective dose equivalent of 0.015 mRem.
(According to the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements
[NCRP Report No.
94],
the estimated total effective dose equivalent rate for a member of the population in the United States from various sources of natural background radiation is 300 mRem per year.)
Tritium activity was not detected in control samples collected from JRR.
Two fish samples collected from WCL contained detectable levels of Cs-137 at concentrations of 21.8 and 40.7 pCi/kg (wet weight).
Although fallout Cs-137 is regularly measured in other environmental media and is probably reflected in these values, it is assumed that these concentrations were attributable to operational station releases.
Cs-137 activity was not detected in JRR control samples nor was detected in pre-operational indicator samples.
An adult consuming 21 kilograms of fish, at the maximum measured Cs-137 concentration for 1999 (40.7 pCi/kg) would receive a committed effective dose equivalent of 0.040 mRem.
No other radionuclides were detected in fish during the year and no unusual trends were noted.
E.
Special Samples (not required by AP 07B-004)
(1)
Bottom Sediment Table 14 shows gamma emitters detected in bottom sediment samples.
Naturally occurring nuclides detected include Be-7, K-40, Ra-226, and Th-228.
Co-60 activity (525, 531 and 663 pCi/kg) was detected in all samples obtained from the WCL discharge cove.
Co-60 activity was attributable to plant operation and has been identified in plant effluents.
Co-60 activity was not detected in pre-operational environmental monitoring and was not detected in samples collected from control location JRR during 1999.
Sb-125 activity (363 pCi/kg) was detected in a sample obtained from the WCL discharge cove.
Sb-125 activity was attributable to plant operation and has been identified in plant effluents.
Sb-125 activity was not detected in pre operational environmental monitoring and was not detected in samples collected from control location JRR during 1999.
Cs-137 activity (262, 220 and 307 pCi/kg) was detected in all indicator samples obtained from the WCL discharge cove.
Cs-137 activity has also been identified in plant effluents.
Since Cs-134 was not present and Cs-137 activity (161 and 129 pCi/kg) was also detected in the control location
- samples, this activity was primarily due to fallout and not to a newly produced fission product of plant origin.
It should be noted that Cs-134 activity has been detected in previous years (1992, 1994 and 1995)
- thus, a
portion of this activity was likely plant-related.
Cs-137 activity was detected in pre-operational samples, and the results for 1999 indicator bottom sediment samples were within the pre-operational range.
(Cs-137 activity detected in 1981 and 1982 was in the range of 79 to 950 pCi/kg.)
No other radionuclides were detected in bottom sediment samples and no unusual trends were noted.
1999 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 9 of 49
Attachment I to WO 02-0024 Page 4 of 4 (2)
Aquatic Vegetation Table 15 lists gamma emitters detected in aquatic vegetation samples.
All samples were obtained from indicator locations.
Naturally occurring Be-7, K-40, Ra-226 and Th-228 were detected in samples collected in 1999 and were also detected during pre-operational monitoring.
Co-58 and Co-60 activity was detected in algae samples obtained from the WCL discharge cove.
This activity was attributed to plant operation and has been identified as expected in plant effluents.
Co-58 and Co-60 were not detected during pre-operational monitoring.
Cs-137 activity was detected in all of the algae samples.
This activity was attributed to a combination of plant operation and fallout.
(Cs-134 activity was detected in samples obtained during 1998.)
Cs-137 activity has been identified in plant effluents and was also identified in pre-operational environmental monitoring.
No other radionuclides were detected in aquatic vegetation samples and no unusual trends were noted.
(3)
Terrestrial Vegetation Grass samples were obtained from the EEA and MUDS.
All samples had naturally occurring Be-7 and K-40 activity detected.
No other radionuclides were detected.
Table 16 reflects gamma emitters detected in terrestrial vegetation samples.
No unusual trends were identified.
(4)
Soil Soil samples were also obtained from the EEA and MUDS.
Naturally occurring Be-7, K-40, Ra-226 and Th-228 activity was detected.
Cs-137 activity was detected in all soil samples.
The Cs-137 activity was attributable to fallout since Cs-134 activity was not detected and the activity levels for Cs-137 were within or below the pre-operational range (255 to 2,160 pCi/kg).
Table 17 lists the activity detected in soil samples.
No unusual trends were identified.
1999 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 10 of 49
Attachment II to WO 02-0024 Page 1 of 3 Attachment II Replacement pages to the 2000 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (Reference WCNOC Letter to NRC, CO 01-0022, dated April 25, 2001)
Attachment II to WO 02-0024 Page 2 of 3 Co-58 activity (19.7 pCi/kg) was detected in an algae sample obtained from the Wolf Creek Lake discharge cove.
This activity was attributed to plant operation and has been identified as expected in plant effluents.
Co-58 was not detected during pre-operational monitoring.
Co-60 activity was detected in two algae samples (DC and MUDS) and an American Lotus sample obtained from the DC Alt location.
This activity was attributed to plant operation and has been identified as expected in plant effluents.
Co-60 activity was not detected during pre-operational monitoring.
Cs-134 activity (44.4 pCi/kg) was detected in an algae sample collected from the Wolf Creek Lake discharge cove.
This activity was attributed to plant operation.
Cs-134 activity has been identified in plant effluents and was not identified in pre-operational environmental monitoring.
Cs-137 activity was detected in four of the five aquatic vegetation samples.
This activity was attributed to a combination of plant operation and fallout.
(Cs-134 activity was detected in samples obtained during 1998 and in 2000.)
Cs-137 activity has been identified in plant effluents and was also identified in pre-operational environmental monitoring.
No other radionuclides were detected in aquatic vegetation samples, and no unusual trends were noted.
(3)
Terrestrial Vegetation Grass samples were obtained from the EEA and MUDS.
Both indicator samples had naturally occurring Be-7 and K-40 activity detected.
No other radionuclides were detected.
Table 17 reflects gamma emitters detected in terrestrial vegetation samples.
No unusual trends were identified.
(4)
Soil Soil samples were obtained from indicator locations EEA and MUDS.
A control soil sample was not obtained.
Naturally occurring K-40, Ra-226 and Th-228 activity was detected.
Cs-137 (168 pCi/kg) activity was detected in one soil sample obtained from the EEA.
The Cs-137 activity was attributable to fallout since the levels were below the pre-operational range (255 to 2,160 pCi/kg).
Table 18 lists the activity detected in soil samples.
No unusual trends were identified.
NOTE: The pre-operational Cs-137 results (255 to 2,160 pCi/kg) for soil samples were decay corrected.
The decay corrected pre-operational range is 179.3 to 1519.5 pCi/kg.
The measured Cs-137 activity of the soil sampled on 06-12-2000 was 168 +/-
24 pCi/kg which is below the decay corrected pre-operational range.
Cs-137 activity was not detected in air samples collected during 2000.
The measured Cs-137 activity in the soil sample was likely due to previous fallout and not to a recently produced fission product associated with plant operation.
2000 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 10 of 55
Attachment II to WO 02-0024 Page 3 of 3 Sample Count Type Location Nuclide Result Required Units Date Date LLD 09-21-00 12-13-00 Surface MUSH Fe-59 32.5 30 pCi/l Water 09-21-00 12-13-00 Surface MUSH Zr-95 19.1 15 pCi/l Water 09-21-00 12-13-00 Surface MUSH Ba-140 1500 15 pCi/l Water 09-21-00 12-13-00 Surface DC Ba-140 925 15 pCi/l Water Performance Improvement Request 2000-2541:
Per the Teledyne Brown Engineering Report of Analysis, several required gamma detection limits were exceeded due to a delay in counting.
To prevent recurrence, samples are now sent to a different lab.
NOTE: The KDHE Ba-140 results for the split surface water samples collected 09-21-00 were less than 10 pCi/l.
2000 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 14 of 55 Sample Date Samples Type Location Nuclide Required Units Date were received LLD by Env.,
Inc.
09-27-00 02-07-01 Corn NRUI 1-131 60 pCi/kg, wet 09-27-00 02-07-01 Soybeans NRU1 1-131 60 pCi/kg, wet 10-04-00 02-07-01 Soybeans NRD2 1-131 60 pCi/kg, wet 10-04-00 02-07-01 Soybeans NRDI 1-131 60 pCi/kg, wet Performance Improvement Request 2000-2541:
These samples were originally submitted to Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc. for analysis; however, Teledyne was unable to perform the analysis.
The samples were returned to Wolf Creek.
The samples were then forwarded on to Environmental, Inc.
Due to the long delay between sampling and counting dates, the 1-131 LLDs could not be met.
WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION 2001 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT A
f March 21, 2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ii List of Figures iii Introduction 1
I. Program Description 2
I1. Discussion of Results 5
I1l. Annual Land Use Census Results 11 IV. Program Revisions/Changes 12 V.
Program Deviations 13 VI.
Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results 14 VII. Comparison to the Radioactive Effluents Release Program 15 Tables 16 Figures 35 Appendix A - Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results A-1 Appendix B - Summary Tables B-1 Appendix C - 2001 Individual Sample Results C-1 Air Particulate Filters C-2 Charcoal Filters C-24 Surface Water C-39 Ground Water C-52 Drinking Water C-74 Shoreline Sediment C-95 Fish C-98 Food/Garden Crops C-1 04 Feed and Forage C-110 Bottom Sediment C-111 Aquatic Vegetation C-117 Terrestrial Vegetation C-120 Soil C-122 i
LIST OF TABLES 1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Description 16 2
Sample Location Numbers, Distances (Miles) and Directions 21 3
Airborne Particulate Gross Beta Analyses 22 4 Airborne Particulate Quarterly Composite Gamma Isotopic Analyses 24 5
First and Second Quarter TLD Results 25 6 Third and Fourth Quarter TLD Results 26 7 Surface Water Radiological Analyses 27 8 Ground Water Radiological Analyses 27 9 Drinking Water Radiological Analyses 28 10 Shoreline Sediment Radiological Analyses 28 11 Milk Radiological Analyses 29 12 Fish Radiological Analyses 29 13 Broadleaf Vegetation Radiological Analyses 30 14 Crop Radiological Analyses 30 15 Bottom Sediment Radiological Analyses 31 16 Aquatic Vegetation Radiological Analyses 31 17 Terrestrial Vegetation Radiological Analyses 31 18 Soil Radiological Analyses 31 19 Land Use Census Data 32 20 Comparison of 2000 and 2001 Land Use Census Milk and Garden Data 33 21 Dosimetry Performance Testing Results 34 ii
LIST OF FIGURES 1 Airborne Pathway Sampling Locations 35 2
Direct Radiation Pathway Sampling Locations 36 3 Waterborne Pathway Sampling Locations 37 4
Ingestion Pathway Sampling Locations 38 5
Distant Sampling Locations 39 6 Airborne Gross Beta Weekly Results 40 7
Historical Airborne Smoothed Indicator and Control Gross Beta 41 8
Burlington, Kansas Average Precipitation 42 9
TLD Nearsite Locations and Control Locations 43 10 Variation of Nearsite TLD Averages Expressed as a Ratio to Control Values 44 11 Wolf Creek Lake Surface Water Smoothed Tritium Data 45 12 Cumulative Liquid Effluent Tritium Data 46 13 Drinking Water Gross Beta, Historical 47 14 Tritium in Wolf Creek Lake Fish Compared to Discharge Cove Surface Water 48 15 Detected Cs-137 Activity in Bottom Sediment 49 16 Tritium Dose in Wolf Creek Lake Surface Water and Released Liquid Tritium 50 Maximum Organ Dose iii
INTRODUCTION The 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS) covers the period from January 1 through December 31, 2001.
WCGS is located in Coffey County, Kansas, approximately five miles northeast of Burlington, Kansas.
Fuel loading commenced at WCGS on March 12, 1985.
The operational phase of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) began with initial criticality on May 22, 1985, and the first detectable quantities of radioactivity were reported in plant effluents in June 1985.
This report contains a description of the REMP conducted by Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC), results of sample analyses, a discussion of monitoring program results, a description of revisions to and deviations from the program, and the results of Interlaboratory Comparison Programs.
Individual sample results and a summary of results in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Branch Technical Position specified format are included as appendices.
Plant-related activation, corrosion or fission products were not detected during 2001 in airborne particulate and radioiodine filters, ground water, drinking water, shoreline sediment, broadleaf vegetation, crops, terrestrial vegetation, aquatic vegetation or soil.
Activation, corrosion or fission products attributable to plant operation were detected during 2001 in surface water, fish, and bottom sediment samples.
Nuclides detected in REMP samples were below applicable NRC reporting levels, and program lower limits of detection were met.
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 1 of 50
I. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Radiological environmental samples were collected according to the schedule in WCGS procedure AP07B-004, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program). Environmental samples were collected by the WCGS Environmental Management group and were analyzed by Environmental, Inc.
Detroit Edison processed environmental TLDs at the Enrico Fermi 2 plant.
Table 1 lists sampling pathways and frequencies of sampling and analysis.
Table 2 lists each sample location's distance and direction from the plant. Samples in addition to those required by the WCGS Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) were also obtained.
The following is a description of the sampling and analysis program by individual pathways.
A. Airborne Pathway Low volume air sampling pumps collected particulate and radioiodine samples on 47 mm glass fiber filters and charcoal canisters, respectively.
The filters and charcoal canisters were changed out weekly, labeled, and shipped to Environmental, Inc. for analysis. The volume of air sampled was calculated from the average of initial and final flow rates and the total time of collection. Each pump was equipped with a time totalizer that was checked weekly against the elapsed time to identify electrical power outages.
Gross beta analysis of the air particulate samples was performed after a nominal 72-hour period to allow the radon (Rn-222) and thoron (Rn-220) daughter products to decay.
Weekly air particulate filters were combined into quarterly composites for each location and analyzed for gamma emitting isotopes.
Charcoal canisters were routinely counted in groups of five to determine the presence or absence of 1-131. Positive indication of 1-131 would have resulted in analysis of each individual charcoal canister.
Air samples were collected from five locations. Indicator locations 2, 18 and 37 included the three sectors with the highest ground level deposition constants (D/Q), the community of New Strawn (indicator location 32), and a control location at Hartford (location 40). Distances and directions to sampling locations from the plant are listed in Table 2, indicator locations are shown in Figure 1, and the control location is shown in Figure 5.
B. Direct Radiation Pathway Panasonic UD-814-AQ TLDs were used at 47 locations during the sample year. The TLDs consist of one lithium-borate element and three calcium sulfate elements in a plastic case.
TLDs were typically positioned roughly 3 to 4 feet above the ground in plastic thermostat boxes.
The thermostat boxes protect the TLDs from the elements and tampering.
Two TLDs were placed at each designated location. Indicator TLD sample locations are illustrated in Figure 2 and control locations are shown in Figure 5. Table 2 provides the distance and direction of each location from the plant. Control locations were 39 (Beto Junction) and 40 (Hartford).
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 2 of 50
C. Waterborne Pathway All water samples were analyzed to determine whether gamma emitters were present.
In addition to gamma isotopic analysis, radiochemical analysis for 1-131 was performed on drinking water and ground water samples. Gross beta analysis was also performed on drinking water samples. Tritium analysis was performed monthly by liquid scintillation for surface water and quarterly for drinking water. Tritium analysis was also performed quarterly on ground water samples. Water sampling locations are listed in Table 2 and are shown in Figures 3 and 5.
Surface water was sampled monthly from the outfall of John Redmond Reservoir (JRR) as a control (location MUSH) and periodically from the JRR lake as a control (location JRR).
Surface water was sampled monthly from the discharge cove (DC) of Wolf Creek Lake as an indicator location. The spillway (SP) of Wolf Creek Lake was also sampled periodically as an indicator location.
Ground water samples were collected quarterly from four locations.
Location B-12 is hydrologically up gradient from the site and is used as a control location.
Three locations (C-10, C-49 and D-65) are hydrologically down gradient from the site and were used as indicator sample locations.
Duplicate samples were obtained from location C-49 and were labeled L-49. A duplicate sample was also obtained from location C-10 and was labeled N-10.
These duplicate samples served as laboratory quality checks.
Drinking water was sampled at the water treatment facilities for the towns of Burlington (control location BW-15) and LeRoy (indicator location LW-40).
The Burlington facility is located upstream and the LeRoy facility is located downstream of the confluence of the discharge from Wolf Creek Lake and the Neosho River.
Composite samples were obtained monthly from automatic samplers at each location that collected about 10 ml of drinking water each hour.
During October, the aliquot collected was changed to approximately 27 ml of drinking water every two hours.
Shoreline sediments were sampled semiannually for gamma analysis at the Wolf Creek Lake discharge cove (DC) indicator location and at the control location (JRR). The Make-up Water Discharge Structure (indicator location MUDS) was also sampled.
D. Ingestion Pathway Because no sampling locations that produce milk for human consumption were identified within five miles of the plant, milk was not collected during the sample year.
Fish were sampled semiannually from the tail waters of JRR (control, Figure 4) and from Wolf Creek Lake (indicator, Figure 4) for gamma isotopic analysis. Several species of game fish and rough fish were sampled. Gamma isotopic analysis was performed on boneless meat portions of the fish. Fish were also analyzed for tritium.
Broadleaf vegetation samples were collected monthly when available during the growing season from three gardens. Two indicator (A-2 and G-1) gardens (Figure 4) and a control (S-4) garden (Figure 5) were sampled. Gamma isotopic analyses were performed on all samples.
Two crop samples were obtained from one indicator location (NR-D2) downstream of the confluence of Wolf Creek and the Neosho River. The samples were irrigated with water from 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 3 of 50
the Neosho River. Gamma isotopic analysis was performed on each sample. No crop samples were collected from location NR-D1 since the crops were not irrigated. Indicator locations are identified on Figure 5.
E. Additional Samples Collected (not required by AP 07B-004)
Bottom sediment samples were collected semiannually for gamma analysis at the Wolf Creek Lake discharge cove (DC) indicator location and the control location (JRR). Three bottom sediment samples were also collected from the Ultimate Heat Sink (indicator location UHS)
These samples were collected as part of a cooperative sampling effort with the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE).
The sample locations are identified on Figure 3.
Aquatic vegetation was collected for gamma analysis from indicator locations at the Wolf Creek Lake (WCL), the MUDS and the Environmental Education Area (EEA). These samples were collected as part of a cooperative sampling effort with the KDHE. The sample locations are identified on Figure 3.
Terrestrial vegetation was sampled from indicator locations MUDS and EEA for gamma isotopic analyses.
These samples were collected as part of a cooperative sampling effort with the KDHE. The sample locations are identified on Figure 4.
Soil was sampled from indicator locations MUDS, EEA and Q-1 for gamma isotopic analyses.
These samples were collected as part of a cooperative sampling effort with the KDHE. The sample locations are identified on Figure 4.
Distance and direction information for the sampling locations listed in this section are outlined in Table 2.
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 4 of 50
II. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS Analysis results for all pathways are summarized in Appendix B using the format described in Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979 (NRC Generic Letter 79-065). Results for individual samples are listed in Appendix C.
In this section, results are discussed by pathway and analysis type. Monitoring results are compared with control data, preoperational values, sources of radioactivity, and effluent releases when applicable. Trends or seasonal effects are discussed. Associated counting uncertainties for detected activity values contained in Tables 3 through 18 are shown in Appendix C.
A. Airborne Pathway Results of the weekly gross beta analysis are summarized in Table 3. In addition, Figure 6 graphically illustrates weekly gross beta results for the sample year. Figure 7 represents the historical smoothed averages of indicator and control gross beta data.
Figures 6 and 7 demonstrate how closely the indicator and control locations tracked together.
Figure 7 reveals a seasonal cyclic trend in which gross beta values peak in the winter months (December or January) and decrease to a low point in the spring months (May or June). Figure 8 represents monthly precipitation averages for Burlington, Kansas.
When Figure 8 is compared to Figure 7, an inverse relationship is observed, i.e., the greater the precipitation the lower the gross beta activity. This relationship is expected since water shields the naturally occurring radiation coming from the ground and dilutes the concentrations of naturally occurring radionuclides in the soil.
The gross beta results of 2001 were compared to pre-operational monitoring results of 1983 and 1984.
The weekly gross beta analyses range for 1983 and 1984 was 0.0064 to 0.084 pCi/m 3. The 2001 weekly gross beta analyses range for indicator locations was 0.012 to 0.055 pCi/m 3, which was within the 1983 and 1984 pre-operational range.
Additionally, the annual mean for indicator locations for 2001 (0.029 pCi/m 3) was lower that the annual mean for 1983 (0.032 pCi/i 3).
Results of the quarterly gamma analysis of air particulate filter composite analyses are summarized in Table 4. Naturally occurring Be-7 activity was detected, as was the case during pre-operational monitoring.
In 1984, the range for Be-7 detected activity was 0.024 to 0.211 pCi/m 3 for indicator locations, and the annual mean for indicator locations was 0.069 pCi/mi.
In 2001, the range for Be-7 detected activity was 0.06 to 0.099 pCi/m 3 for indicator locations, and the annual mean for indicator locations was 0.075 pCi/m 3.
Required lower limits of detection were met and 1-131 activity was not detected in the weekly analysis of charcoal filters.
No effects of plant operation were seen via the airborne pathway for the year, and no unusual trends were noted.
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 5 of 50
B. Direct Radiation Pathway Quarterly gamma exposures measured at each location are shown in Tables 5 and 6.
Measured values have been converted to a standard 90-day quarter.
The annual mean of all indicator locations in 2001 was 0.232 mR/day and the annual mean for the control locations was 0.215 mR/day. These results are similar to the pre-operational results for 1981.
In 1981, the annual mean of all indicator locations was 0.21 mR/day and annual mean for the control locations was 0.19 mR/day.
In 2001, the indicator location with the highest annual mean (0.304 mR/day) was location 47.
Location 47 was added to the sampling program in 1997 and has since been the indicator location with the highest annual mean. The close proximity of location 47 to the Radwaste Building is likely the reason direct radiation levels are higher at this location.
Results from TLDs located near the plant (less than approximately three miles) which would be most affected by changes in plant operation were combined into quarterly averages. These nearsite averages, using locations 1, 2, 7-14, 18, 26-30, 37 and 38, are compared to control location results (locations 39 and 40) in Figure 9. In addition, variation of the nearsite averages from the control location results is displayed graphically in Figure 10.
These figures also include preoperational data for comparison.
The nearsite TLD locations have historically trended higher than the control locations both prior to and after WCGS became operational.
C. Waterborne Pathway (1) Surface Water Tritium, attributable to WCGS operation, was detected in all surface water samples collected from Wolf Creek Lake during 2001. According to the Radioactive Effluent Controls Program, a total of 847 curies of liquid tritium was released during the year. Measured concentrations are shown in Table 7. An adult drinking 2 liters per day of surface water collected from the Wolf Creek Lake discharge cove, using the annual mean of detected tritium activity (12,760 pCi/liter),
would receive a committed effective dose equivalent of 0.583 mRem per year.
An adult drinking 2 liters per day of surface water collected from the Wolf Creek Lake discharge cove, using the highest detected tritium activity (15,726 pCi/liter), would receive a committed effective dose equivalent of 0.718 mRem per year. (According to the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements [NCRP Report No. 94], the estimated total effective dose equivalent rate for a member of the population in the United States from various sources of natural background radiation is 300 mRem per year.)
Figure 11 illustrates smoothed tritium data for location DC from startup in May 1985 through 2001. The cumulative curies of liquid tritium released to Wolf Creek Lake is illustrated in Figure 12.
It can be seen in Figure 11 that monthly surface water tritium concentrations have trended upward since plant startup. This is expected until the average tritium concentration of the lake reaches equilibrium.
Required lower limits of detection were met and tritium activity was not detected in samples obtained from the control location (MUSH).
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 6 of 50
During pre-operational environmental radiological monitoring, measured radiological activity was not detected in surface water samples.
Tritium was the only activity detected in surface water samples and no unusual trends were noted.
(2) Ground Water Required lower limits of detection were met and radioactivity was not detected in ground water samples obtained from indicator sample locations nor from the control sample location. Activity due to plant operation was not evident in ground water samples and no unusual trends were noted.
(3) Drinking Water Results of drinking water radiological analyses are summarized in Table 9. Figure 13 illustrates the historical drinking water gross beta data and how closely the gross beta results compared for the indicator and control locations.
Gross beta activity was detected in all drinking water samples. The annual mean of the control location gross beta activity (4.3 pCi/liter) was higher than the annual mean of the indicator location (4.1 pCi/liter). The 2001 annual means for gross beta activity were lower than those of the pre-operational monitoring year of 1984. In 1984, the annual mean of the control location gross beta activity was 6.4 pCi/liter, and the annual mean of the indicator location gross beta activity was 7.5 pCi/liter.
Required lower limits of detection were met. Tritium activity was not detected in any drinking water samples. Additionally, radionuclides were not detected by the 1-131 or gamma isotopic analyses.
Activity due to plant operation was not evident in drinking water samples during 2001, and no unusual trends were noted.
(4) Shoreline Sediment Shoreline sediment analysis results are summarized in Table 10. Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in samples obtained from indicator locations (9,376-10,947 pCi/kg, dry) and samples obtained from control locations (10,581-11,243 pCi/kg, dry).
These concentrations were comparable to pre-operational sample results. The pre-operational range (1982 through 1984) of K-40 at the discharge cove was 8,870 to 15,500 pCi/kg, dry and the range at the JRR for the same period of time was 8,400 to 14,500 pCi/kg, dry.
Required lower limits of detection were met. Naturally occurring K-40 was the only activity detected in shoreline sediment samples.
Activity due to plant operation was not evident in shoreline sediment samples during 2001, and no unusual trends were noted.
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 7 of 50
D. Ingestion Pathway (1) Milk Milk was not collected during the sample year since no indicator locations within five miles of the plant were identified during the Land Use Census.
(2) Fish Analysis results are illustrated in Table 12. Naturally occurring K-40 activity was detected in all fish samples and was within the range seen during the pre-operational monitoring period.
During 2001, fish were also analyzed for tritium. All fish samples taken from Wolf Creek Lake had tritium activity detected (6,457 pCi/kg annual mean).
Those results are illustrated in Figure 14. The detected tritium activity was attributable to plant operation. An adult consuming 21 kilograms of fish, at the maximum measured tritium concentration for 2001 (8,365 pCi/kg),
would receive a committed effective dose equivalent of 0.011 mRem.
(According to the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements [NCRP Report No. 94], the estimated total effective dose equivalent rate for a member of the population in the United States from various sources of natural background radiation is 300 mRem per year.) Figure 14 also illustrates the correlation of detected tritium activity in Wolf Creek Lake fish and detected tritium activity in discharge cove surface water samples.
Tritium activity was not detected in the control samples collected from JRR.
No other radionuclides were detected in fish during the year. The ODCM required lower limits of detection were met and no unusual trends were noted.
(3) Broadleaf Vegetation Gamma analyses of broadleaf vegetation samples during 2001 detected naturally occurring gamma emitters Be-7 and K-40. Be-7 and K-40 activity was also detected pre-operationally.
No other radionuclides were detected in broadleaf vegetation. The ODCM required lower limits of detection were met and no unusual trends were noted. Activity attributable to plant operation was not detected. Table 13 shows the results of 2001 analyses.
(4) Crop Samples In addition to broadleaf vegetation, crop samples were collected. Two indicator samples were obtained from cropland downstream of the confluence of Wolf Creek and the Neosho River.
The indicator samples were irrigated with Neosho River water.
Gamma analysis detected naturally occurring K-40 to be present in both of the samples, with no nuclides detected due to plant operation. Results of crop analyses are summarized in Table 14. The ODCM required lower limits of detection were met and no unusual trends were noted.
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 8 of 50
E. Additional Samples Collected (not required by AP 07B-004)
(1) Bottom Sediment Table 15 shows gamma emitters detected in bottom sediment samples. Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in the bottom sediment samples.
Co-60 activity (565, 415 and 273.1 pCi/kg) was detected in the samples obtained from the Wolf Creek Lake discharge cove. Co-60 activity was attributable to plant operation and has been identified in plant effluents. Co-60 activity was not detected in pre-operational environmental monitoring and was not detected in samples collected from control location JRR during 2001.
Cs-134 activity (59.1 pCi/kg) was detected in one sample obtained from the Wolf Creek Lake ultimate heat sink (UHS).
Cs-134 activity was attributable to plant operation and has been identified in plant effluents. Cs-134 activity was not detected in pre-operational environmental monitoring and was not detected in samples collected from control location JRR during 2001.
Cs-137 activity (108.4, 183.1, 185.1, 210.9, 254 and 296 pCi/kg) was detected in all the indicator samples obtained from Wolf Creek Lake. A portion of this activity is due to fallout and a portion of this activity is likely plant-related since Cs-134 activity was also detected. The presence of Cs-134 is expected if the occurrence of Cs-137 is attributed to a newly produced fission product. Cs-137 activity was detected in pre-operational samples, and the results for 2001 indicator bottom sediment samples were within the pre-operational range.
(Cs-137 activity detected in 1981 and 1982 was in the range of 79 to 950 pCi/kg. The decay corrected range of pre-operational Cs-137 activity detected is approximately 50 to 600 pCi/kg.) Cs-137 activity has been identified in plant effluents. Cs-137 activity (173 and 251 pCi/kg) was also detected in the control location samples.
Figure 15 plots the Cs-137 detected activity from the discharge cove indicator location and JRR control location bottom sediment samples. The detected Cs-137 activity measured from the discharge cove location in 2001 (R2 = 0.1397) decreased the trend relationship from that reported in 2000 (R2 = 0.2179). This indicates that an increasing trend was not observed. The Figure 15 linear trend line indicates that as expected, Cs-137 activity detected at the JRR control location has been decreasing.
No other radionuclides were detected in bottom sediment samples and no unusual trends were noted.
(2) Aquatic Vegetation Table 16 lists gamma emitters detected in aquatic vegetation samples. The three samples were obtained from indicator locations (EEA, MUDS and WCL). Naturally occurring Be-7 and K-40 activity were detected in samples collected in 2001 and were also detected during pre operational monitoring.
No other radionuclides were detected in aquatic vegetation samples and no unusual trends were noted.
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 9 of 50
(3) Terrestrial Vegetation Grass samples were obtained from the EEA and MUDS. Both indicator samples had naturally occurring Be-7 and K-40 activity detected.
No other radionuclides were detected. Table 17 reflects gamma emitters detected in terrestrial vegetation samples. No unusual trends were identified.
(4) Soil Soil samples were obtained from indicator locations EEA, MUDS and Q-1.
A control soil sample was not obtained.
Naturally occurring K-40 activity was detected in the three soil samples.
Cs-137 (127.0, 226.8 and 295.9 pCi/kg) activity was detected in the three soil samples. The pre-operational Cs-137 results (255 to 2,160 pCi/kg) for soil samples were decay corrected.
The decay corrected pre-operational range is approximately 175 to 1487 pCi/kg.
The measured Cs-137 activity of the soil samples obtained during 2001 are within or below the decay corrected pre-operational range.
Cs-137 activity was not detected in air samples collected during 2001.
The measured Cs-137 activity in the soil sample was likely due to previous fallout and not to a recently produced fission product associated with plant operation.
Table 18 lists the activity detected in soil samples. No unusual trends were identified.
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 10 of 50
Ill.
ANNUAL LAND USE CENSUS RESULTS Summary An annual Land Use Census of rural residents within five miles of WCGS was completed during 2001. The two broadleaf vegetation locations with the highest calculated annual average D/Q rankings were G1.6-QURD1384 and C1.9-16RD1655. AP 07B-004, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program) specifies that an "alternate location may be used to provide continued monitoring". The third-ranked ranked garden was at location H3.5-QURD1 175. Tables 19 and 20 contain the summarized results and illustrated changes.
Background
Section 5.2, Attachment A, of the ODCM procedure (AP 07B-004), directs that "a Land Use Census shall be conducted annually during the growing season to identify the nearest (1) milk animal, (2) residence, and (3) garden of greater than 500 square feet producing broadleaf vegetation in each of the 16 meteorological sections within five miles of the WCGS site" and "the results of the Land Use Census shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report."
Table 5-1, Attachment A, of the ODCM (AP 07B-004) requires that broadleaf vegetation samples be collected from two indicator locations with the highest calculated annual average D/Q.
Table 5-1, Attachment A, of the ODCM (AP 07B-004) also requires that milk samples be collected from three indicator locations within five miles of the site having the highest dose potential.
Methodology Surveys were sent to the rural residents within five miles of WCGS on August 10, 2001. A follow up mailing was sent to residents who did not respond. The survey excluded the residents of New Strawn, Burlington and a trailer park just north of Burlington.
These locations were excluded due to the large number of households and the low likelihood that information gained from these residences would affect the locations chosen for REMP sampling.
Of the 170 surveys mailed to the rural residents, 152 were returned by mail or completed by conversing with the residents. The remaining eighteen surveys were partially completed with information obtained by driving by the locations.
Results Table 19 reflects the nearest residences, milk animals and broadleaf gardens. Table 20 lists the changes as compared to the 2000 Land Use Census results for milk animals and gardens producing broadleaf vegetation.
Changes in the nearest residence occurred in sector F, and no milk locations were identified.
Nine location changes were noted for the nearest garden producing broadleaf vegetation.
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 11 of 50
IV. PROGRAM REVISIONSICHANGES Broadleaf vegetation gardens at locations E-1 and F-1 were sampled during 2000; however, the gardens were unavailable to obtain samples from in 2001.
Based upon D/Q rankings and cooperator participation, the program was revised to add broadleaf vegetation indicator location A-1 and alternate indicator location L-1.
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 12 of 50
V. PROGRAM DEVIATIONS Drinking Water The drinking water sampler at LeRoy was found inoperable on January 31, 2001.
It was estimated that drinking water was not sampled from January 20 through January 31, 2001. The corrective actions taken to fix the problem were: installation of a new intake tube, installation of a new internal pump tube, cleaning the sampler and calibrating the sample volume.
The sampler was left in an operating condition. A "grab" drinking water sample was obtained. The sampler was checked on 02-07-2001 and again on 02-21-2001.
On both days, the sampler was found operable with adequate sample volume.
(Performance Improvement Request 20010247)
On September 19, 2001, the drinking water sampler located at Burlington was found inoperable.
According to the sampler, 3 samples were missed.
The sample bottle had approximately 1" of sample water. During the period of 09-05-01 through 09-19-01 the drinking water sampler either collected aliquots smaller than 10 ml. or the sampler was inoperable. The internal pump tube was found to be worn and was the possible cause. A new internal pump tube was installed on the drinking water sampler. The rollers were checked and cleaned. The drinking water sampler sensor was cleaned and the sample volume was calibrated.
The sampler was left in an operating condition.
A "grab" drinking water sample was obtained.
Additionally, to prevent reoccurrence, the drinking water sampler aliquots were changed from 10 ml. every hour to 27 ml. at 120-minute intervals.
(Performance Improvement Request 20012389) 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 13 of 50
VI. INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS During 2001, Environmental, Inc. was contracted to perform radiological analysis of environmental samples for WCNOC.
The lab participated in the Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) Proficiency Testing Program. Appendix A is the Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results for Environmental, Inc. TLD intercomparison results, in-house spikes, blanks, duplicates and mixed analyte performance evaluation program results are also contained in Appendix A.
Table 21 is a summary of statistical results of performance testing of TLDs processed at Enrico Fermi 2 by Detroit Edison, which participated in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program.
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 14 of 50
VII. COMPARISON TO THE RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS RELEASE PROGRAM As described in the sections discussing radioisotopes found in the surface water from Wolf Creek Lake, dose that may be received as a result of tritium released from WCGS is consistent with the theoretical doses calculated by the Radioactive Effluent Release Program.
Figure 16 indicates that the dose to a man resulting from drinking surface water from Wolf Creek Lake was within a reasonable expected value.
Dose for the surface water was determined using the December tritium activity detected for each calendar year at the discharge cove.
Released tritium maximum organ dose (mRem) values were obtained from Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports and are not cumulative (i.e., the values reflected are the totals for the respective years).
The tritium dose values are being compared on a qualitative basis. It is not expected that the annual doses, as calculated in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report, would compare directly to those calculated from the REMP. The Radioactive Effluent Release Report provides a 'snap shot' of potential dose resulting from the year's release.
The REMP data indicate the accumulated result of releasing tritium into the cooling lake since the start of plant operation.
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 15 of 50
TABLE I 2001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM DESCRIPTION (SAMPLE COLLECTION SPECIFIED BY ODCM)
EXPOSURE PATHWAY/
SAMPLE AIRBORNE Radioiodine and Particulates NUMBER OF SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (See Figures 1 & 5)
Samples from five locations SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY Continuous sampler operation with sample collection weekly, or more frequently if required, by dust loading.
Samples from locations near the site boundary in three sectors having the highest calculated annual average D/Q (Locations 2, 18 and 37 on Figure 1)
Sample from the vicinity of a community having the highest calculated annual average DIQ (Location 32 on Figure 1, New Strawn)
Sample from a control location 10-20 miles distant in a low D/Q sector (Location 40 on Figure 5) 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS Analyze radioiodine canister weekly for 1-131 Analyze particulate filter weekly for gross beta activity; perform quarterly gamma isotopic analysis composite (by location)
Page 16 of 50
TABLE 1 (Cont.)
EXPOSURE PATHWAY/
SAMPLE DIRECT RADIATION NUMBER OF SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (See Figures 2 & 5) 40 routine monitoring stations with two or more dosimeters measuring dose continuously, placed as follows:
SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY Quarterly Gamma dose quarterly An inner ring of stations, one in each meteorological sector 0-3 mile range from the site (Locations 1, 7-9, 11-13, 18, 26, 27, 29 31, 37, 38 and 47 on Figure 2).
An outer ring of stations, one in each meteorological sector in the 3-5 mile range from the site (Locations 4-6, 15-17, 19-25, and 33 36 on Figure 2). Five sectors [A, B, D, G, and L] contain an additional station (Locations 2, 3, 10, 14 and 28).
The balance of the stations to be placed in special interest areas such as population centers (Locations 23 and 32), nearby residences 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 17 of 50 TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS
TABLE I (Cont.)
EXPOSURE PATHWAY/
SAMPLE NUMBER OF SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS DIRECT RADIATION (cont.) (
r s
t s
C (
C WATERBORNE(
many locations are iear a residence),
3chools (Location 23),
nd in one or two areas o serve as control
- tations 10-20 miles listant from the site Locations 39 and 40 n Figure 5).
See Figure 3)
One sample upstream (Location MUSH on Figure 3) and one sample downstream (Location DC on Figure 3).
Samples from one or two sources only if likely to be affected.
Monthly grab sample Quarterly grab sample Monthly gamma isotopic analysis and composite for tritium analysis quarterly Quarterly gamma isotopic and tritium analysis Indicator samples at locations hydrologically down gradient of the site (Locations C-10, C 49, and D-65 on Figure 3); Control sample at a location hydrologically up gradient of the site (Location B-1 2 on Figure 3).
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 18 of 50 Surface Ground
TABLE 1 (Cont.)
EXPOSURE PATHWAY/
SAMPLE NUMBER OF SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS WATERBORNE (cont.)
Drinking Shoreline sediment Monthly Composite Semiannually Sample of municipal water supply at an indicator location downstream of the site (Location LW-40 on Figure 5); control sample from location upstream of the site (Location BW-15 on Figure 3).
One sample from the vicinity of Wolf Creek Lake discharge cove; control sample from John Redmond Reservoir (Locations DC and JRR respectively on Figure 3).
(See Figures 4 & 5)
Samples from milking animals at three indicator locations within five miles of the site having the highest dose potential (currently there are no locations producing milk for human consumption within five miles of the site); one sample from a control location greater than 10 miles from the site if indicator locations are sampled.
Monthly gamma isotopic analysis and gross beta analysis of composite sample. Quarterly tritium analysis of composites.
Semiannual gamma isotopic analysis Gamma isotopic analysis and 1-131 analysis of each sample 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 19 of 50 Semimonthly April to November; monthly December-March INGESTION Milk
TABLE 1 (Cont.)
EXPOSURE PATHWAY/
SAMPLE NUMBER OF SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS INGESTION (cont.)
Broadleaf Vegetation Irrigated Crops Fish Semiannually Indicator samples of 1 to 3 recreationally important species from Wolf Creek Lake; control samples of similar species from John Redmond Reservoir spillway (Figure 4).
Samples of available broadleaf vegetation from two indicator locations with highest calculated annual average D/Q (Locations G-1 and A-2); sample of similar broadleaf vegetation from a control location greater than 10 miles from the site in a low D/Q sector (Location S-4 on Figure 5).
Sample of crops irrigated with water from the Neosho River downstream of the Neosho River - Wolf Creek confluence (Location NR-D1 and NR-D2 on Figure 5).
Gamma isotopic analysis on edible portions Gamma isotopic analysis on edible portions Gamma isotopic analysis on edible portions 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 20 of 50 Monthly when available At time of harvest
TABLE 2 SAMPLE LOCATION NUMBERS, DISTANCES (Miles) AND DIRECTIONS Location Distance/
Location Distance/
Location Number Distance/
Number Direction Number Direction Direction Air Particulates and Radioiodine 2
2.7/N 18 3.0/SSE 32 3.2/WNW 37 2.1/NNW 40
>15.0/WNW TLDs 1
1.4/N 17 3.6/SE 33 3.7/WNW 2
2.7/N 18 3.0/SSE 34 4.0/NW 3
3.0/NNE 19 4.0/SSE 35 4.6/NNW 4
4.0/NNE 20 3.3/S 36 4.2/N 5
4.0/NE 21 3.8/S 37 2.1/NNW 6
4.4/ENE 22 4.1/SSW 38 1.2/NW 7
1.9/NE 23 4.5/SW 39 13.0/N 8
1.6/NNE 24 4.1/WSW 40
>15.0/WNW 9
2.0/ENE 25 3.6/W 41 0.8/NNW 10 2.4/ENE 26 2.6/WSW 42 0.8/SSE 11 1.6/E 27 2.1/SW 43 0.8/WNW 12 1.8/ESE 28 2.8/SW 44 3.0/NNW 13 1.5/SE 29 2.6/SSW 45 1.6/WNW 14 2.6/SE 30 2.2/W 46 1.5/WNW 15 4.5/ESE 31 3.0/WNW 47 0.16/S 16 4.2/E 32 3.2/WNW Ground water Drinking water Surface water B-12 2.2/NNE BW-15 3.9/SW MUSH 3.6/W C-1 0/N-10 2.8/W LW-40
>10.0/SSE DC 0.6/WNW C-49/L-49 2.9/SW SP 2.9/S D-65 3.9/S JRR 4.0/W Milk Broadleaf vegetation Irrigated Crops No samples A-2 4.9/N NR-D2
>10.0/S collected G-1 1.6/SE S-4
>15.0/WNW Fish Shoreline Sediment Aquatic Vegetation/Algae WCL 0.6/WNW DC 0.6/WNW WCL 0.75/WNW JRR 4.0/W JRR 4.0/W EEA 3.0/NNW MUDS 1.5/WNW MUDS 1.5/WNW Terrestrial Vegetation & Soil Bottom Sediment EEA 3.0/NNW DC 0.6/WNW MUDS 1.5/WNW JRR 4.0/W Q-1 1.0/NW (Soil only)
UHS 0.6/E 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 21 of 50
TABLE 3 Airborne Particulate Gross Beta Analyses pCi/cubic meter (analysis counting uncertainties reported in Appendix C)
Date Location Beginning 2Ending 218 32 37 40 (Control) 01/03/2001 01/10/2001 0.025 0.025 0.024 0.024 0.022 01/10/2001 01/18/2001 0.033 0.037 0.043 0.044 0.035 01/18/2001 01/25/2001 0.036 0.038 0.042 0.044 0.035 01/25/2001 01/31/2001 0.027 0.025 0.027 0.027 0.021 01/31/2001 02/07/2001 0.026 0.025 0.025 0.026 0.022 02/07/2001 02/14/2001 0.019 0.017 0.018 0.020 0.017 02/14/2001 02/21/2001 0.046 0.039 0.046 0.046 0.040 02/21/2001 02/28/2001 0.023 0.024 0.022 0.024 0.023 02/28/2001 03/07/2001 0.030 0.028 0.028 0.035 0.028 03/07/2001 03/14/2001 0.026 0.027 0.024 0.027 0.023 03/14/2001 03/22/2001 0.020 0.017 0.017 0.018 0.015 03/22/2001 03/29/2001 0.023 0.023 0.022 0.026 0.025 03/29/2001 04/05/2001 0.020 0.023 0.021 0.020 0.022 04/05/2001 04/11/2001 0.029 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.027 04/11/2001 04/18/2001 0.022 0.022 0.028 0.023 0.022 04/18/2001 04/24/2001 0.028 0.022 0.023 0.020 0.022 04/24/2001 05/02/2001 0.032 0.033 0.032 0.033 0.027 05/02/2001 05/08/2001 0.018 0.018 0.021 0.014 0.016 05/08/2001 05/16/2001 0.027 0.028 0.028 0.035 0.025 05/16/2001 05/22/2001 0.023 0.018 0.023 0.025 0.021 05/22/2001 05/31/2001 0.016 0.015 0.018 0.015 0.014 05/31/2001 06/07/2001 0.015 0.012 0.014 0.012 0.012 06/07/2001 06/13/2001 0.028 0.027 0.037 0.027 0.026 06/13/2001 06/21/2001 0.024 0.023 0.025 0.024 0.022 06/21/2001 06/27/2001 0.036 0.033 0.032 0.032 0.031 06/27/2001 07/02/2001 0.034 0.030 0.029 0.032 0.028 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 22 of 50
TABLE 3 (Cont.)
Airborne Particulate Gross Beta Analyses pCi/cubic meter (analysis counting uncertainties reported in Appendix C)
Date I
Location Beginning J Ending 2
18 32 37 40 (Control) 07/02/2001 07/11/2001 0.025 0.024 0.027 0.022 0.026 07/11/2001 07/18/2001 0.028 0.026 0.030 0.024 0.027 07/18/2001 07/25/2001 0.039 0.033 0.039 0.035 0.033 07/25/2001 08/01/2001 0.024 0.019 0.023 0.021 0.021 08/01/2001 08/08/2001 0.035 0.036 0.038 0.035 0.041 08/08/2001 08/15/2001 0.030 0.025 0.034 0.029 0.027 08/15/2001 08/22/2001 0.029 0.028 0.030 0.033 0.026 08/22/2001 08/29/2001 0.032 0.029 0.031 0.032 0.033 08/29/2001 09/05/2001 0.031 0.029 0.029 0.030 0.032 09/05/2001 09/14/2001 0.030 0.029 0.028 0.030 0.029 09/14/2001 09/19/2001 0.033 0.040 0.036 0.038 0.035 09/19/2001 09/26/2001 0.029 0.025 0.028 0.028 0.028 09/26/2001 10/03/2001 0.030 0.032 0.029 0.031 0.033 10/03/2001 10/10/2001 0.030 0.031 0.029 0.029 0.027 10/10/2001 10/17/2001 0.024 0.023 0.024 0.025 0.026 10/17/2001 10/24/2001 0.038 0.031 0.034 0.042 0.040 10/24/2001 10/31/2001 0.028 0.023 0.024 0.025 0.029 10/31/2001 11/07/2001 0.027 0.028 0.031 0.029 0.030 11/07/2001 11/14/2001 0.055 0.053 0.051 0.053 0.057 11/14/2001 11/21/2001 0.043 0.043 0.038 0.044 0.043 11/21/2001 11/28/2001 0.025 0.028 0.026 0.025 0.025 11/28/2001 12/05/2001 0.036 0.030 0.028 0.032 0.028 12/05/2001 12/12/2001 0.035 0.038 0.031 0.033 0.033 12/12/2001 12/19/2001 0.042 0.039 0.037 0.040 0.038 12/19/2001 12/26/2001 0.026 0.023 0.023 0.029 0.029 12/26/2001 01/02/2002 0.026 0.030 0.032 0.033 0.031 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 23 of 50
TABLE 4 Airborne Particulate Quarterly Composite Gamma Isotopic Analyses pCi/cubic meter (analysis counting uncertainties reported in Appendix C)
Location Quarter Be-7 2
1 0.06 18 1
0.07 32 1
0.07 37 1
0.06 40 1
0.06 2
2 0.09 18 2
0.07 32 2
0.09 37 2
0.08 40 2
0.07 2
3 0.073 18 3
0.080 32 3
0.078 37 3
0.099 40 3
0.087 2
4 0.068 18 4
0.066 32 4
0.078 37 4
0.065 40 4
0.075 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 24 of 50
TABLE 5 First and Second Quarter TLD Results (mR/90 day qtr)
First Quarter Second Quarter Location Days 90 Day Avg.
2 std dev ]I Location Days 90 Day Avg.
2 std dev 1
83.8 23.4 1.8 1
91.0 22.2 2.3 2
84.9 21.5 1.5 2
91.0 21.1 1.5 3
83.2 22.5 1.1 3
91.0 20.3 1.3 4
83.2 23.2 0.8 4
91.0 21.7 2.3 5
83.2 21.5 1.0 5
91.0 21.6 2.3 6
83.2 21.5 1.5 6
91.0 20.2 1.6 7
83.1 21.3 1.1 7
91.0 20.0 1.3 8
83.1 23.3 1.6 8
90.8 22.1 1.2 9
83.1 20.8 1.7 9
91.0 20.7 2.1 10 83.1 23.0 1.7 10 91.0 21.9 2.3 11 83.1 24.2 1.5 11 91.0 22.8 1.3 12 83.2 22.3 1.3 12 91.0 21.1 1.0 13 83.2 23.7 1.0 13 91.0 23.0 3.3 14 83.1 22.6 1.6 14 91.0 21.6 1.2 15 83.2 22.9 1.5 15 91.0 21.1 1.8 16 83.2 22.6 1.2 16 91.0 23.5 4.4 17 83.2 22.3 1.9 17 91.0 21.2 1.2 18 85.0 22.6 1.3 18 91.1 24.8 1.3 19 84.8 23.7 1.3 19 90.3 23.7 3.1 20 84.8 22.1 1.6 20 90.3 22.9 3.2 21 84.8 20.5 1.4 21 90.3 20.6 3.5 22 85.8 23.3 1.4 22 90.3 21.8 1.5 23 84.8 22.3 1.0 23 90.3 22.9 2.7 24 84.8 22.8 1.9 24 90.4 22.2 2.0 25 84.0 20.5 1.4 25 91.1 18.4 1.2 26 84.8 22.4 6.9 26 90.3 20.9 1.1 27 84.8 21.1 1.1 27 90.3 22.3 1.4 28 84.8 20.2 1.9 28 90.3 23.0 3.2 29 84.8 20.2 4.6 29 90.3 20.8 4.8 30 84.0 25.3 0.9 30 91.1 22.8 0.9 31 85.0 21.3 1.8 31 91.0 20.5 0.9 32 84.9 22.3 1.3 32 91.2 22.1 2.1 33 84.0 23.4 0.7 33 91.1 23.4 2.3 34 84.9 22.5 1.8 34 91.1 23.6 2.0 35 84.8 24.7 5.0 35 91.0 22.1 1.1 36 84.8 22.0 1.7 36 91.0 21.2 1.7 37 84.9 21.4 1.0 37 91.0 20.5 0.9 38 84.9 24.0 1.2 38 91.0 25.7 8.3 39 83.0 21.7 1.4 39 91.1 21.1 1.3 40 84.9 20.8 1.5 40 91.1 18.6 1.3 41 83.8 27.1 4.1 41 91.0 22.1 1.2 42 83.0 18.4 1.0 42 91.0 16.3 1.2 43 83.0 17.8 0.8 43 91.0 15.3 1.1 44 84.9 22.7 3.3 44 91.2 21.4 2.0 45 83.2 24.1 3.0 45 91.1 25.4 1.5 46 84.0 22.8 1.9 46 91.1 22.9 1.1 47 83.0 43.9 1.1 47 91.0 26.8 2.1 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 25 of 50
TABLE 6 Third and Fourth Quarter TLD Results (mR/90 day qtr)
Third Quarter F
Fourth Quarter Location Days 90 Day Avg.
2 std dev I[ Location Days 90 Day Avg.
2 std dev 1
96.1 19.9 0.6 1
89.8 21.2 6.3 2
96.1 17.5 1.8 2
89.9 21.0 1.4 3
101.9 18.3 1.1 3
84.0 22.6 2.4 4
101.9 18.2 1.0 4
84.0 22.7 3.2 5
101.9 16.9 0.5 5
84.0 21.4 0.9 6
101.9 17.0 1.2 6
84.0 19.9 1.0 7
102.0 17.3 1.4 7
84.0 19.7 1.3 8
102.1 19.1 1.3 8
84.0 21.6 1.4 9
101.9 16.1 1.6 9
84.0 20.7 1.5 10 101.9 18.4 1.5 10 84.0 23.7 2.1 11 101.9 20.2 0.9 11 84.0 22.9 1.5 12 101.9 18.1 1.2 12 84.0 21.3 2.1 13 101.9 19.6 1.4 13 84.0 22.0 5.5 14 101.9 18.4 1.1 14 84.0 21.3 1.4 15 101.9 18.6 1.1 15 84.0 21.4 0.8 16 101.9 18.2 1.2 16 84.0 24.1 6.8 17 101.9 17.6 1.1 17 84.0 21.0 2.0 18 101.8 17.8 0.7 18 84.0 21.6 2.4 19 95.9 20.4 0.8 19 89.9 21.7 2.1 20 95.9 19.3 0.8 20 89.9 21.0 2.1 21 95.9 17.3 2.3 21 89.9 18.3 2.2 22 95.9 20.1 1.0 22 89.9 20.6 1.1 23 95.9 18.5 1.5 23 89.9 18.7 0.8 24 95.9 19.0 1.3 24 89.9 20.4 3.3 25 95.9 15.8 1.1 25 90.0 17.8 1.5 26 95.9 16.8 0.6 26 90.0 19.3 1.2 27 95.9 18.3 0.8 27 90.0 20.8 0.9 28 95.9 18.6 2.4 28 90.0 19.0 1.5 29 95.9 14.7 1.2 29 90.0 17.9 1.3 30 95.9 18.6 1.5 30 90.0 22.2 1.7 31 95.9 17.5 1.5 31 90.0 20.4 0.7 32 95.9 17.1 1.1 32 90.0 20.8 1.6 33 95.9 20.3 1.3 33 90.0 23.1 0.8 34 101.8 18.2 1.8 34 84.2 22.7 0.9 35 102.0 18.2 1.0 35 84.0 23.7 1.2 36 102.0 18.0 1.8 36 84.0 22.8 2.2 37 96.1 17.8 0.9 37 89.8 20.2 3.1 38 96.1 19.2 0.7 38 89.8 22.7 1.3 39 97.7 17.5 1.1 39 88.3 20.9 1.1 40 97.7 15.5 1.2 40 88.3 18.9 0.9 41 96.1 19.3 1.9 41 89.8 22.4 1.1 42 96.1 12.4 1.2 42 90.0 14.9 0.7 43 96.1 11.9 1.0 43 90.0 15.0 1.2 44 95.9 18.3 1.5 44 89.8 21.6 1.2 45 95.9 19.6 1.5 45 89.9 23.6 0.7 46 95.9 17.7 1.4 46 89.9 21.4 1.1 47 96.1 18.2 1.3 47 90.0 20.6 1.7 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 26 of 50
TABLE 7 Surface Water Radiological Analyses pCi/liter (analysis counting uncertainties reported in Appendix C)
Location Date H-3 DC 01/18/2001 15726 DC 02/15/2001 14775 DC 03/15/2001 13645 DC 04/19/2001 13314 DC 05/24/2001 13446 DC 06/21/2001 11527 DC 07/19/2001 11397 DC 08/16/2001 10648 SP 08/16/2001 10720 DC 09/20/2001 12081 SP 09/20/2001 11316 DC 10/19/2001 11520 SP 10/19/2001 11881 DC 11/16/2001 11884 SP 11/16/2001 12265 DC 12/20/2001 13158 SP 12/20/2001 13211 TABLE 8 Ground Water Radiological Analyses pCi/liter (analysis counting uncertainties reported in Appendix C)
During 2001, radioactivit was not detected in ground water samples.
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 27 of 50
TABLE 9 Drinking Water Radiological Analyses pCi/liter (analysis counting uncertainties reported in Appendix C)
Location Start Date Gr-B BW15 01/04/2001 4.7 LW40 01/04/2001 4.4 LW40 (Grab) 01/31/2001 3.5 BW15 02/07/2001 4.1 LW40 02/07/2001 3.5 BW15 03/07/2001 4.3 LW40 03/07/2001 3.9 BW15 04/05/2001 3.8 LW40 04/05/2001 3.6 BW15 05/02/2001 4.0 LW40 05/02/2001 3.5 BW15 06/08/2001 3.4 LW40 06/08/2001 3.9 BW15 07/06/2001 3.8 LW40 07/06/2001 4.7 BW15 08/01/2001 4.6 LW40 08/01/2001 4.3 BW15 (Grab) 09/19/2001 3.7 BW15 09/05/2001 4.7 LW40 09/05/2001 4.0 BW15 10/03/2001 5.1 LW40 10/03/2001 4.3 BW15 11/07/2001 4.7 LW40 11/07/2001 5.6 LW40 12/05/2001 4.5 BW15 12/05/2001 4.7 TABLE 10 Shoreline Sediment Radiological Analyses pCi/kg, dry (analysis counting uncertainties reported in Appendix C)
Location Date K-40 DC 05/18/2001 10935 JRR 05/18/2001 10581 MUDS 06/25/2001 9376 DC 10/03/2001 10947 JRR 10/03/2001 11243 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 28 of 50
TABLE 11 Milk Radiological Analyses pCilliter (analysis counting uncertainties reported in Appendix C)
Milk was not collected during 2001.
TABLE 12 Fish Radiological Analyses pCi/kg, wet (analysis counting uncertainties reported in Appendix C)
Species Location
-Date K-40 H-3 COMMON CARP WCL 05/07/2001 3338 5492 SM BASS WCL 05/07/2001 3379 4830 CHANNEL CATFISH WCL 05/07/2001 2852 3944 CHANNEL CATFISH JRR 05/11/2001 3215
<113 BM BUFFALO JRR 05/11/2001 2997
<111 COMMON CARP JRR 05/11/2001 3200
<106 COMMON CARP JRR 10/03/2001 3197.2
<114 BM BUFFALO JRR 10/03/2001 3076.4
<102 CHANNEL CATFISH JRR 10/03/2001 2945.9
<119 FLATHEAD CATFISH WCL 10/12/2001 3136.0 7436 COMMON CARP WCL 10/12/2001 3210.2 6943 WIPER WCL 10/12/2001 3398.4 8365 WHITE BASS WCL 10/12/2001 3687.2 8003 SM BUFFALO WCL 10/12/2001 3046.4 6649 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 29 of 50
TABLE 13 Broadleaf Vegetation Radiological Analyses pCi/kg, wet (analysis counting uncertainties reported in Appendix C)
Type Location Date Be-7 K-40 CABBAGE G-1 05/31/2001
<231 4212 CABBAGE S-4 05/31/2001 379 2823 RHUBARB LEAVES A-2 05/31/2001 411 4716 CABBAGE G-1 06/21/2001 520 3311 CABBAGE S-4 06/21/2001
<246 3108 RHUBARB LEAVES A-2 06/27/2001
<127.0 3874 CABBAGE S-4 07/18/2001 328.9 3023.2 RHUBARB LEAVES A-2 07/25/2001 472 5686 CABBAGE G-1 07/25/2001
<203 3393 RHUBARB LEAVES A-2 08/22/2001 435 5043 RHUBARB LEAVES S-4 08/22/2001 355 3233 RHUBARB LEAVES A-2 09/19/2001 733.6 4352.1 TURNIP GREENS G-1 09/19/2001
<276.6 3745.9 CABBAGE S-4 09/19/2001 1235.7 2694.0 TURNIP GREENS G-1 10/24/2001 474.7 3608.5 RHUBARB LEAVES A-2 10/24/2001 313.9 5120.7 CABBAGE S-4 10/24/2001 801.4 2318.5 RHUBARB LEAVES A-2 11/20/2001 309.9 6407.1 RHUBARB LEAVES S-4 11/20/2001 620.7 7340.1 TURNIP GREENS G-1 11/20/2001 398.8 5434.8 TABLE 14 Crop Radiological Analyses pCi/kg, wet (analysis counting uncertainties reported in Appendix C)
Type Location Date K-40 CORN (irrigated)
NR-D2 10/24/2001 3289.7 SOYBEANS (irrigated)
NR-D2 10/24/2001 17240.0 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 30 of 50
TABLE 15 Bottom Sediment Radiological Analyses pCilkg, dry (analysis counting uncertainties reported in Appendix C)
Location Date K-40 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 DC 05/18/2001 12949 565
<83.8 296 JRR 05/18/2001 17424
<53.2
<61.4 251 UHS-1 07/26/2001 12982.0
<22.3 59.1 185.1 UHS-2 07/26/2001 10918.0
<22.2
<19.5 108.4 UHS-3 07/26/2001 12095.0
<44.5
<51.8 183.1 JRR 10/03/2001 20186
<46.8
<70.5 173 DC 10/03/2001 14100 415
<67.2 254 DC1 10/03/2001 13855.0 273.1
<67.1 210.9 TABLE 16 Aquatic Vegetation Radiological Analyses pCi/kg, wet (analysis counting uncertainties reported in Appendix C)
Type Location Date Be-7 K-40 ALGAE EEA 05/22/2001 348 2490 PONDWEED MUDS 08/23/2001 683 2765 COONTAIL WCL 10/12/2001
<173.4 4155.8 TABLE 17 Terrestrial Vegetation Radiological Analyses pCi/kg, wet (analysis counting uncertainties reported in Appendix C)
Type Location Date Be-7 K-40 GRASS EEA I 05/22/2001 529 6613 GRASS MUDS 06/25/2001 2371 5442 TABLE 18 Soil Radiological Analyses pCi/kg, dry (analysis counting uncertainties reported in Appendix C)
Location Date K-40 Cs-1 37 EEA 05/22/2001 9578 127.0 MUDS 06/25/2001 10912 295.9 Q-1 11/29/2001 11465.0 226.8 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 31 of 50
TABLE 19 2001 Land Use Census Data Location of Nearest:
Sector Residence Milking Animals Broadleaf A
A2.6-17TE1520 None None B
B3.1-QURD1712 None B3.6-QURD1755 C
C1.9-16RD1655 None C1.9-16RD1655 D
D2.1-QULA1571 None D3.2-RERD1601 E
E1.8-QULA1485 None None F
F1.8-14RD1730 None F2.5-RERD1391 G
G1.6-QURD 1384 None G1.6-QURD 1384 H
H3.1-12RD1711 None H3.5-QURD1175 J
J3.7-11RD1540 None J3.8-11RD1531 K
K2.6-12LA1439 None K4.1-NARD1120 L
L2.4-NARD 1339 None L2.6-NARD 1309 M
M1.8-NARD1441 None M3-13LA1 290 N
N2.1-15RD1350 None None P
P2.8-HW751534 None P3.4-16RD1 198 Q
Q 1.4-NALA1574 None None R
R4.4-NARD1891 None None Locations are identified based upon the following protocol:
EXAMPLE: A1.4-16RD1525 First letter is based upon sector, thus "A" designates this residence is in sector A.
The number immediately following the first letter designates the distance (in miles) from the power block.
The characters following the dash represent a unique identifier based upon location address.
The example is in sector A, 1.4 miles from the plant, at 1525 16th Road.
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 32 of 50
TABLE 20 Comparison of 2000 and 2001 Land Use Census Milk and Garden Data 2000 CLOSEST 2001 CLOSEST 2000 2001 GARDEN GARDEN D/Q SECTOR MILKING MILKING PRODUCING PRODUCING RANKING ANIMALS ANIMALS BROADLEAF BROADLEAF VEGETATION VEGETATION A
none none A4.9-OXRD1940 None B
none none B3.6-QURD1755 B3.6-QURD1755 8
C none none C3.6-RERD1675 Cl.9-16RD1655 2
D none none D2.1-QULA1571 D3.2-RERD1601 11 E
none none E4.4-TRRD1551 None F
none none F2.5-RERD1391 F2.5-RERD1391 6
G none none G1.6-QURD1384 G1.6-QURD1384 1
H none none H4.85-10RD1698 H3.5-QURD1175 3
J none none J3.8-11RD1535 J3.8-11RD1531 10 K
none none K3.8-11RD1499 K4. 1-NARD 1120 9
L none none L2.6-NARD1309 L2.6-NARD1309 4
M none none M3-13LA1290 M3-13LA1290 5
N none none N3.1-HW751434 None P
none none P4.8-HIDR348 P3.4-16RD1198 7
Q none none None None R
none none None None NOTE: Entries underlined indicate changes from the 2000 Land Use Census.
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 33 of 50
TABLE 21 Dosimetry Performance Testing Results NATIONAL VOLUNTARY LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM PERSONNEL DOSIMETRY PERFORMANCE TESTING
SUMMARY
OF STATISTICAL RESULTS PROCESSOR NAME:
PROCESSOR CODE:
DOSIMETER DESCRIPTION:
TEST RESULTS FOR QUARTER:
TESTING STATUS:
TYPE OF DOSIMETER REPORT PRINTED:
DETROIT EDISON COMPANY 100529 B PANASONIC UD-802AS/ISA 820 200004 RENEWAL WHOLE BODY 11 January 2001 SHALLOW DEPTH DEEP DEPTH CATEGORY B
S IBI+S L
B S
IBI + S L
01 NOT TESTED 0.026 0.049 0.074 0.30 02 NOT TESTED
-0.087 0.107 0.195 0.30 3A 0.051 0.077 0.128 0.50 0.069 0.101 0.170 0.50 3B NOT TESTED NOT TESTED 04 NOT TESTED
-0.033 0.065 0.098 0.50 5A NOT TESTED NOT TESTED 5B NOT TESTED NOT TESTED 5C 0.019 0.169 0.189 0.50 NOT TESTED 06 0.075 0.223 0.298 0.50
-0.014 0.112 0.125 0.50 07
-0.010 0.123 0.133 0.50
-0.015 0.059 0.074 0.50 08-TOTAL NOT TESTED
-0.037 0.041 0.077 0.50 08-NOT TESTED
-0.032 0.102 0.134 0.50 NEUTRON 09 NOT TESTED NOT TESTED B = Bias S = Standard Deviation L = Limit The laboratory successfully completed ANSI N13.11(1993)/NVLAP testing in categories I, II, Ill(A), IV, V(C), VI, VII and VIII.
2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 34 of 50
FIGURE 1 AIRBORNE PATHWAY SAMPLING LOCATIONS
- =
AIRBORNE PARTICULATE AND RADIOIODINE 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 35 of 50
FIGURE 2 DIRECT RADIATION PATHWAY SAMPLING LOCATIONS
=
TLD LOCATIONS 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 36 of 50
FIGURE 3 WATERBORNE PATHWAY SAMPLING LOCATIONS
- =
DRINKING WATER 0 =
GROUND WATER
"* =
BO'FOM SEDIMENT A =
SURFACE WATER
- =
SHORELINE SEDIMENT
=
AQUATIC VEGETATION /ALGAE 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 37 of 50
FIGURE 4 INGESTION A =
FISH (JRR)
PATHWAY SAMPLING LOCATIONS
=
BROADLEAF VEGETATION /IRRIGATED CROPS F=
ISH (WCL)
=
TERRESTRIAL VEGETATION AND SOIL
= SOIL 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 38 of 50
FIGURE 5 DISTANT SAMPLING LOCATIONS
- =
TLD m =
DRINKING WATER
"* =
AIRBORNE PARTICULATE & RADIOIODINE
-- BROADLEAF VEGETATION/
IRRIGATED CROPS 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 39 of 50
2001 Airborne Gross Beta Weekly Results
-__c:>
CD~
CD
- 0) 0 (a-CD~
CDO) 0 CD
- 0)
_0
(
w
-D CD
- 0)
-1
- 0)
Cn 0
0 C'1 70 0.070 0.060
()
Z 0.050 E
0.040 0 C)
-- 0.030
- 0) 0.020 0
L.9 0.010 0.000 L _
i L
j!I I
I II 0
4 8
12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 Week Number 0 Location 2
- Location 18
+ Location 32 A Location 37 --
Location 40 00
+
A A
+
03 "1
C)
- a m
0o "-" ---
Historical Airborne Smoothed (Avg of 20) Indicator and Control Gross Beta
@ :3 0.060 (D :
- p-C G) a)
Chernobyl accident CD~ (1))
S E
0.050 E3.
9*m 0<
CD-
- 0.
-9, oC) 0.040
.1 CD 03 U)
CD 0_
0.030
'9; t*--
al I'1
='
'n CD
-o oo E
(03 "0
SmohdAeaeCnrlLcain(0 mohdAvrg niao oain I-'---Smoothed Average Control Location (40)
- - - Smoothed Average Indicator LocationsI
o o
-, -R Burlington, Kansas Average Precipitation 6.00 CD~
CD CL B"
0 55.0 0
Q 4.00 3
4.00 CD 0m 2.00 1.00 CD (0
CD 0
0.00 o*
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0:
Source: The Weather Channel Website (www.weather.com)
TLD Nearsite Locations and Control Locations 2o 0
C<
0>
CD q
- 0)
"G)
(DU 0
0 (D
=3 (0
(D (D
_0 (0
CD 9
Avg. of Nearsite Locations Moving Avg. of Nearsite Locations Avg. of Control Locations
- - - Moving Avg. of Control Locations 1
"11 m
(0 22.0 20.0 18.0 E
16.0 14.0 12.0 1 i
i i
i i
I i
i I
i i
I i 1980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001
2 0 Variation of Nearsite TLD Averages Expressed as a Ratio to Control Values 0>
=*
120.0 SC Gn)
@D 0.
05 115.0
(--'.O CO.
Qa) 110.0 0
3w
-(D
- 3 0
CD G
n CU 0
X f"
0 m
(0 0
4-° 0100.0 o0 0V 95.0 (D
1980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001 4
C*
Nearsite Average (<3 miles distance) to Control Average expressed as percentage L
Moving Average Trendline
OS;0o 9e7ed uo!,eS 6uileJeueE) ý99jD jlOM jiodeqj 6uileiedO leUe9WUOJ!AUlJ leo!6olo!peBI lenuuv 10o0 pCi/liter
(
--4
--4 o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 04/16/1985 03/18/1986 +
08/19/1986 "
01/20/1987 T 06/16/1987 cn 11/17/1987 B 04/19/1988 0 o 09/20/1988 D 02/21/1989 0
cL07/18/1989 ÷ o 12/19/1989 +
05/15/1990 CD (a-10/16/1990-L<-"
CD 2.03/19/1991 II 08/20/1991 jc 01/21/1992 +
061/23/1992 0
11/17/1992 t CD 04/20/1993 091/2111993 CDg 02/15/1994 Tc 07/21/1994 3
12/22/1994 0
05/16/1995 CD 10/24/1995 -C I
w03/26/1996 +
I
- 08/22/1996 4-
3 01/21/1997 -i 3
0 06/17/1997 4-2
@111/21/1997 4 L 04/21/1998
= 09/24/1998 (D02/18/1999 07/28/1999 12/15/1999 05/18/2000 10/19/2000 03/15/2001
- 08/16/2001,
L, a*lnl
FIGURE 12 o
0 0
0 0
0 0
o 0
0D 0
0 0
0 0
00 (0
C N
sepno 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Wolf Creek Generating Station Page 46 of 50 ca C9 0
E C
a) d LU w
"0 E
£-1,00 t,-000O I.-0ooz Z-666 1
£-9661, tr-L661, L-L66 1, Z-966 I, C-966 1 t'-t,66 L I,1766 I Z-S661 C-Z66 1.
"t-1,661, L-1,661, Z-066 1,
£-6961, "89961 l-9961, Z-L961,
£-996 1, t7-996 1, L-996L V
a)
M Cu E
- 3 E) i n
7 T I 0
I(JojeolpuI) OwlM (loiluoo) g Ime...
Q) co(ZQ j
I I
I I
I I
iioda~j IlfluuV 0661.
U! peqpflsap UO!1eiA9P aidwes se Gwil awes le peinnooo 0
oz 0
0 CD OVJ 09 leO!JOIS!H 'e)GEf SSOJO JieMe 6UNUIJuul C) cm) m U-
- 00.
CL CL
- 0.
0 E
0 L..> 0
- 0) 0) 0 ci2
~cu
-C:
CD Cc) 04
09 10o 2t eBed uollelS 6ullejeuge
)jeeJQ IlOM jiodeIj bu!,ejaedo IeuWUOJ!Au3 leo IOlopeOIO lenuuv LOOZ N
0A
- 0) 0 C0 N0 D
- 0) w 0
0 0
0 C0 0
0 0
0
- 0) 0
- 0)
C 0
0 C0 0
0l C
10/11/1994 10/11/1994 04/07/1995
-'-4 05/15/1995 C
10/11/1995 o>
10/11/1995 o
04/16/1996 CA CD C
04/1611996 CD CD 10/16/1996 cr w
0 CD 10/16/1996 m
0 04/16/1997--
o::"T
- 0) 04/16/1997 0
09/17/1997 10/15/1997
- 0.
-.I 0
05/13/1998 05/13/1998 0
=r 10114/1998 CD m
05/26/1999 o
05/26/1999 I
CI) 10/12/1999 00 10/12/1999 (D
04/18/2000 11/14/2000 11/14/2000 05/07/2001 10/12/2001 n mnfo1_
Detected Cs-1 37 Activity in Bottom Sediment o C) 0>
CDJ CD CL
@0
('0 0<
-a (0
(D 0ý C) 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200-100 1
- m Em u "
R2 "- 0.5615 0
N\\
N\\
N
\\
. C s-i 37 JRR Cs-i 37 -
Linear Trendline (DC) ------
Linear Trendline (JRR)1 R 2 =0.1397 U
"-o
- 0) 03 0.
"f1 m
U'
-n1 Ml 0
2o&
Tritium Dose in WCL Surface Water and Released Liquid Tritium Maximum Organ Dose 0>
C:
0.800 G)
CD X
- 3 W.
0700
--w-REMP DOSE
@ o-0.700 (o Q.
- -MAX ORGAN DOSE (RELEASED) 0.600 I
0 3
CD E ""'0.500 O
E-n
-0 w
CD W
C 00.400 C
o3 0.30 0M (D
0
-0 0
z 0.300 0.200
-u 0.100 CD C,'
01 o
0.000 C1 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 YEAR
Environmental, Inc.
Midwest Laboratory an Allegheny Technologies Co.
700 Landwehr Road
- Northbrook, IL 60062-2310 (847) 564-0700 fax (847) 564-4517 APPENDIX A INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS NOTE: Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory participates in intercomparison studies administered by Environmental Resources Associates, and serves as a replacement for studies conducted previously by the U.S. EPA Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada. Results are reported in Appendix A. TLD Intercomparison results, in-house spikes, blanks, duplicates and mixed analyte performance evaluation program results are also reported. Appendix A is updated four times a year; the complete Appendix is included in March, June, September and December monthly progress reports only.
January, 2001 through December, 2001
Appendix A Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory, formerly Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Midwest Laboratory has participated in' interlaboratory comparison (crosscheck) programs since the formulation of it's quality control program in December 1971.
These programs are operated by agencies which supply environmental type samples (e.g., milk or water) containing concentrations of radionuclides known to the issuing agency but not to participant laboratories. The purpose of such a program is to provide an independent check on a laboratory's analytical procedures and to alert it of any possible problems.
Participant laboratories measure the concentration of specified radionuclides and report them to the issuing agency.
Several months later, the agency reports the known values to the participant laboratories and specifies control limits. Results consistently higher or lower than the known values or outside the control limits indicate a need to check the instruments or procedures used.
The results in Table A-1 were obtained through participation in the environmental sample crosscheck program for milk, water and air filters during the past twelve months. Data for previous years is available upon request.
This program was conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Characterization Research Division-Las Vegas, Nevada.
The results in Table A-2 were obtained for Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs), via various International Intercomparisons of Environmental Dosimeters under the sponsorships listed in Table A-2.
Results of crosscheck testing with Teledyne Brown Engineering are also listed.
Table A-3 lists results of the analyses on in-house "spiked" samples for the past twelve months. All samples are prepared using NIST traceable sources. Data for previous years available upon request.
Table A-4 lists results of the analyses on in-house "blank" samples for the past twelve months. Data for previous years available upon request.
Table A-5 list results of the in-house "duplicate" program for the past twelve months. Acceptance is based on the difference of the results being less than the sum of the errors. Data for previous years available upon request.
The results in Table A-6 were obtained through participation in the Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program.
The results in Table A-7 were obtained through participation in the Environmental Measurement Laboratory Quality Assessment Program.
Attachment A lists acceptance criteria for "spiked" samples.
Out-of-limit results are explained directly below the result.
Al
12-31-01 Attachment A Acceptance Criteria for "Spiked" Samples Laboratory Precision: One Standard Deviation Values for Various Analysis a Analysis Level One Standard Deviation for single determinations Gamma Emitters 5 to 100 pCi/liter or kg 5.0 pCi/liter
>100 pCi/liter or kg 5% of known value Strontium-89b 5 to 50 pCi/liter or kg 5.0 pCi/liter
>50 pCi/liter or kg 10% of known value Strontium-90b 2 to 30 pCi/liter or kg 5.0 pCi/liter
>30 pCi/liter or kg 10% of known value Potassium-40
>0.1 g/liter or kg 5% of known value Gross alpha 20 pCi/liter 5.0 pCi/liter
>20 pCi/liter 25% of known value Gross beta 100 pCi/liter 5.0 pCi/liter
>100 pCi/liter 5% of known value Tritium 4,000 pCi/liter ls=(pCi/liter)= 169.85x(known)0 °0 9
>4,000 pCi/liter 10% of known value Radium-226, -228 0.1 pCi/liter 15% of known value Plutonium 0.1 pCi/liter, gram or sample 10% of known value Iodine-131, Iodine-129b 55 pCi/liter 6.0 pCi/liter
>55 pCi/liter 10% of known value Uranium-238, 35 pCi/liter 6.0 pCi/liter Nickel-63b
>35 pCi/liter 15% of known value Technetium-99b Iron-55b 50 to 100 pCi/liter
>100 pCi/liter Othersb a
From EPA publication, "Environmental Radioactivity Program, Fiscal Year, 1981-1982, EPA-600/4-81-004" Laboratory limit.
A2 10 pCi/liter 10% of known value 20% of known value Laboratory Intercomparison Studies
Table A-1.
Interlaboratory Comparison Crosscheck program, Environmental Resource Associates (ERA)a.
Concentration in pCi/Lb Lab Sample Date Control Code Type Collected Analysis Laboratory result' ERA Result' Limits STY STV STV STY STV STY STV STV STV STV STV*
STV STV STV STV STY STV STV STV STV STV STW STW STV*
STW STV*
STW STV STV ST\\A STO STWý STO STW STWA SPA 1-897 WATER Jan, 2001 Gr. Alpha 31.9+/-2.1 1-897 WATER Jan, 2001 Gr. Beta 25.3 +/- 2.7 1-900 WATER Feb, 2001 1-131 27.2 +/-0.8 1-902 WATER Feb, 2001 Ra-226 4.0+/-0.1 1-902 WATER Feb, 2001 Ra-228 13.8 +/-0.4 1-902 WATER Feb, 2001 Uranium 17.0+/-0.3 1-903 WATER Mar, 2001 H-3 17,400.0 +/-69.7 1-917 WATER Apr, 2001 Gr. Alpha 57.4+/-3.5 1-917 WATER Apr, 2001 Ra-226 13.5+/-0.4 1-917 WATER Apr, 2001 Ra-228 10.1 +/-0.6 1-917 WATER Apr, 2001 Uranium 14.2 +/-0.2 1-918 WATER Apr, 2001 Co-60 27.9 +/-1.4 1-918 WATER Apr, 2001 Cs-1 34 16.0 +/-0.4 1-918 WATER Apr, 2001 Cs-137 195.4+/- 1.5 1-918 WATER Apr, 2001 Gr. Beta 340.0+/- 51.0 1-918 WATER Apr, 2001 Sr-89 62.8+/- 5.7 1-918 WATER Apr, 2001 Sr-90 34.2+/-1.6 1-919 WATER Jun, 2001 Ba-133 37.8+/-1.2 1-919 WATER Jun, 2001 Co-60 49.9 +/- 0.7 1-919 WATER Jun, 2001 Cs-1 34 16.0+/-1.4 1-919 WATER Jun, 2001 Cs-1 37 208.0+/- 1.7 1-919 WATER Jun, 2001 Zn-65 37.8+/- 0.7 1-920 WATER Jun, 2001 Ra-226 14.6+/- 0.4 1-920 WATER Jun, 2001 Ra-228 6.2 +/- 0.2
/-920 WATER Jun, 2001 Uranium 49.0 +/- 1.0 V-921 WATER Jul, 2001 Sr-89 19.8+/- 1.5 Delay in processing may have attributed to deviation.
Result of reanalysis; Sr-89, 35.3 +/- 4.4 pCi/L. Sr-90, 25.0 + 2.8 pCi/L.
V-921 WATER Jul, 2001 Sr-90 26.3+/- 1.1
/-922 WATER Jul, 2001 Gr. Alpha 23.3 +/- 1.9 V-922 WATER Jul, 2001 Gr. Beta 48.5+/-4.6 V-924 WATER Aug, 2001 H-3 2,680.0+/-41.9
/-931 WATER Sep, 2001 Ra-226 10.9 +/-0.2
/-931 WATER Sep, 2001 Ra-228 9.7 +/- 1.1
/-931 WATER Sep, 2001 Uranium 11.2+/-0.1 V-932 WATER Oct, 2001 1-131 7.7 +/- 0.3
/-933 WATER Oct, 2001 Gr. Alpha 82.2+/-4.0
/-933 WATER Oct, 2001 Ra-226 9.5+/- 1.2 45.7 +/- 11.4 16.7 +/- 5.0 28.3 +/- 3.0 4.7 +/- 0.7 14.4 +/- 3.6 20.4 +/- 3.0 17,800.0 + 1,780.0 56.0+/-14.0 17.7 +/-2.7 8.1 +/-2.0 15.6 +/-3.0 26.4 +/-5.0 16.9 +/- 5.0 186.0 +/- 9.3 343.0 +/-1.7 64.1 +/- 5.0 33.8 +/- 5.0 36.0 +/- 5.0 46.8 +/- 5.0 15.9+/- 5.0 197.0 +/- 9.9 36.2 +/- 5.0 15.4+/-2.3 4.5+/-1.1 55.7 +/- 5.6 31.2 +/- 5.0 25.9 +/- 5.0 17.8+/- 5.0 53.0 +/-10.0 2,730.0 +/- 356.0 10.8++/-1.6 9.0+/-2.2 13.1 +/-3.0 7.7 +/- 2.0 97.5 +/- 24.4 10.8++/-1.6 25.9 - 65.5 8.0 - 25.4 23.1 - 33.5 3.4 - 5.9 8.2 - 20.6 15.2 - 25.6 14,700. - 20,900.0 31.8-80.2 13.1 -22.3 4.6-11.6 10.4-20.8 17.7-35.1 8.2 - 25.6 170.0 - 202.0 252.0 - 428.0 55.5 - 72.8 25.1 -42.5 27.3 - 44.7 38.1 - 55.5 7.2 - 24.6 180.0 - 214.0 27.5 - 44.9 11.4-19.4 2.6 - 6.5 46.1 - 65.3 22.5 - 39.9
.17.2-34.6 9.1 - 26.5 35.7 - 70.3 2,110.0 - 3,350.0 8.0- 13.6 5.1 - 12.8 7.9-18.3 4.2-11.2 55.3-140.0 8.0- 13.6 Al-1
Table A-1.
Interlaboratory Comparison Crosscheck program, Environmental Resource Associates (ERA)a.
Concentration in pCi/Lb Lab Sample Date Control Code Type Collected Analysis Laboratory resultc ERA Result' Limits STW-933 WATER Oct, 2001 Ra-228 17.0+/- 0.8 15.6+/-3.9 8.9-22.4 STW-933 WATER Oct, 2001 Uranium 32.2 +/- 1.4 37.2 +/- 3.7 30.7 - 43.6 STW-934 WATER Oct, 2001 Co-60 82.4+/- 0.9 78.4 +/-5.0 69.7-87.1 STW-934 WATER Oct, 2001 Cs-134 52.2+/- 1.3 54.1 +/-5.0 45.4 - 62.8 STW-934 WATER Oct, 2001 Cs-137 39.4+/-0.6 37.9+/-5.0 26.3-43.7 STW-934 WATER Oct, 2001 Gr. Beta 166.0+/- 7.1 192.0+/-28.8 142.0 - 242.0 STW-934 WATER Oct, 2001 Sr-89 12.8+/- 0.8 16.7+/-5.0 8.0-25.4 STW-934 WATER Oct, 2001 Sr-90 6.8 +/- 0.7 7.7 +/- 5.0
-1.0 - 16.4 STW-935 WATER Oct, 2001 Gr. Alpha 63.5+/-2.5 64.0+/- 16.0 36.5 - 91.5 STW-935 WATER Oct, 2001 Gr. Beta 26.0+/- 1.2 21.5+/- 5.0 12.8 - 30.2 STW-938 WATER Nov. 2001 Ba-1 33 66.7 +/- 1.2 69.3 +/-6.9 57.5 - 81.1 STW-938 WATER Nov, 2001 Co-60 59.3 +/- 0.6 59.7 +/- 5.0 51.0 - 68.4 STW-938 WATER Nov, 2001 Cs-134 86.7+/- 1.5 93.9+/-5.0 85.2-103.0 STW-938 WATER Nov, 2001 Cs-1 37 45.0 +/- 1.0 42.0 +/- 5.0 33.3 - 50.7 STW-938 WATER Nov, 2001 Zn-65 80.7 +/- 0.6 77.3 +/- 7.7 63.9 - 90.7 Results obtained by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the environmental samples crosscheck program operated by Environmental Resources Associates (ERA).
SAll results are in pCi/L, except for elem ental potassium (K) data in m ilk, which are in m g/L; air filter samples, which are in pCi/Filter.
C Unless otherwise indicated, the laboratory result is given as the mean +/- standard deviation for three determinations.
" Results are presented as the known values, expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determination) and control limits as provided by ERA.
A1-2
Table A-2. Crosscheck program results; Thermoluminescent Dosimeters. (TLDs).
mR Lab Known Lab result Code TLD Type Date Measurement Value
+/- 2 Sigma Control Limits Teledyne Brown En-gineeringq 2000-1 LiF-100 Chips 2000-1 LiF-100 Chips 2000-1 LiF-100 Chips Mar, 2000 Mar, 2000 Mar, 2000 Reader 1, #1 Reader 1, #2 Reader 1, #3 17.8 35.5 62.2 14.4+/- 0.2 32.4 +/-0.1 61.8 +/- 0.9 12.46 - 23.14 24.85 - 46.15 43.54 - 80.86 Teledyne Brown Engineering 2000-2 CaSO,: Dy Cards Mar, 2000 2000-2 CaSO,: Dy Cards Mar, 2000 2000-2 CaSO,: Dy Cards Mar, 2000 Chips and cards irradiated by Teledyne 12th International Intercomparison 022-1 CaSO4: Dy Cards 022-1 022-1 022-1 022-1 CaSO,:
CaSO4:
CaSO4:
CaSO,:
Dy Cards Dy Cards Dy Cards Dy Cards Jun, 2000 Jun, 2000 Jun, 2000 Jun, 2000 Jun, 2000 Reader 1, #1 17.8 Reader 1,#2 35.5 Reader 1, #3 62.2 Brown Engineering, Westwood, Field Field 1 Field 2 Field 3 Lab, 1 161.0 548.0
.391.0 623.0 391.0 21.3 +/- 0.3 40.1 +/-1.9 69.9 +/- 3.5 New Jersey, in March 184.9 +/- 1.9 502.2+/-1.7 412.0+/-2.9 643.2 +/- 2.9 442.8 +/- 2.5 12.46 - 23.14 24.85 - 46.15 43.54 - 80.86 of 2000.
112.70 - 209.30 383.60 - 712.40 273.70 - 508.30 436.10 - 809.90 273.70 - 508.30 Environmental, Inc.
2001-1 CaSO,: Dy Cards 2001-1 CaSO,: Dy Cards 2001-1 CaSO,: Dy Cards 2001-1 CaSO4: Dy Cards 2001-1 CaSO,: Dy Cards 2001-1 CaSO,: Dy Cards 2001-1 CaSO,: Dy Cards 2001-1 CaSO4: Dy Cards Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Reader 1, #1 Reader I #1 Reader 1 #2 Reader 1 #2 Reader 1 #3 Reader 1 #3 Reader 1 #4 Reader 1 #4 4.0 4.0 7.1 7.1 15.9 15.9 63.6 63.6 3.7+/-0.1 3.4+/- 0.1 7.9 +/- 0.2 7.6 +/- 0.3 18.6+/-0.4 19.6_+/-0.1 78.2+/-1.2 79.9 +/- 2.5 2.79-5.17 2.79-5.17 4.95-9.19 4.95-9.19 11.13-20.67 11.13-20.67 44.53 - 82.69 44.53 - 82.69 A2-1
Table A-3.
In-house "spike" samples.
Concentration in pCi/L" Lab Sample Date Laboratory results Known Controlc Code Type Collected Analysis 2s, n=lb Activity Limits SPAP-477 Air Filter Jan, 2001 Cs-137 SPW-479 Water Jan, 2001 H-3 SPW-481 Water Jan, 2001 Gr. Alpha SPW-481 Water Jan, 2001 Gr. Beta SPW-482 Water Jan, 2001 Gr. Alpha SPW-482 Water Jan, 2001 Gr. Beta SPW-483 Water Jan, 2001 Ra-226 SPW-483 Water Jan, 2001 Ra-228 Sample was lost during analysis. Insufficient sample SPW-485 Water Jan, 2001 Co-60 SPW-485 Water Jan, 2001 Cs-1 34 SPW-485 Water Jan, 2001 Cs-1 37 SPW-485 Water Jan, 2001 Sr-90 SPAP-754 Air Filter Jan, 2001 Gr. Beta SPW-1 037 Water Feb, 2001 U-233/4 SPW-1 037 Water Feb, 2001 U-238 SPW-1224 Water Feb, 2001 Ra-226 SPW-1224 Water Feb, 2001 Ra-228 SPW-1225 Water Feb, 2001 Gr. Alpha SPW-1225 Water Feb, 2001 Gr. Beta SPW-1272 Water Feb, 2001 1-131 SPW-1 272 Water Feb, 2001 1-131(g)
SPVE-1274 Vegetation Feb, 2001 1-131(g)
SPCH-1276 Charcoal Feb, 2001 1-131(g)
SPMI-1270 Milk Mar, 2001 Cs-134 SPMI-1270 Milk Mar, 2001 Cs-1 37 The Cs-1 37 spike is suspect; A new cesium spike ha SPMI-1270 Milk Mar, 2001 1-131(g)
SPU-2901 Urine Mar, 2001 H-3 SPW-2161 Water Mar, 2001 Ra-228 SPU-3128 Urine Apr, 2001 H-3 SPW-3129 Water Apr, 2001 Gr. Alpha 1.76 +/- 0.02 1.68 1.01 -2.35 54702.00+/-644.00 54549.00 43639.20- 65458.80 58.08 +/-2.79 69.14 34.57-103.71 213.83_+/-3.07 220.26 198.23 - 242.29 51.77+/-_2.18 69.14 34.57-103.71 202.48 +/- 2.98 220.26 198.23 - 242.29 20.11 +/- 0.34 20.86 14.60 - 27.12 10.55+/-2.02 19.43 13.60 - 25.26 available to perform reanalysis.
33.53+/-3.40 31.13 21.13 - 41.13 32.80_+/-2.54 30.81 20.81 - 40.81 42.10+/-5.60 36.00 26.00 - 46.00 154.34+/-3.49 137.66 110.13 - 165.19 8.53-+/-0.02 7.88
-2.12 - 17.88 3.74+/--0.10 4.17 2.50-5.84 3.81 +/--0.10 4.17
-7.83 - 16.17 21.25+/- 0.50 20.68 14.48 - 26.88 21.76+/-2.65 19.27 13.49 -25.05 71.87+/-3.07 69.14 34.57 - 103.71 36.30+/-1.47 28.75 18.75 - 38.75 56.82-+/- 0.71 63.05 50.44 - 75.66 65.69+/-10.21 63.05 53.05 - 73.05 0.78 +/-0.05 0.76 0.45 -.1.06 1.57+/-0.05 1.58 0.95-2.21 31.89_+/-4.71 29.77 19.77 - 39.77 46.61 +/-+8.81 35.90 25.90 - 45.90 s been prepared. Reference to SPMI-3232.
81.92+/- 10.80 81.95 71.95 - 91.95 51512.00+/- 1369.00 50189.00 40151.20 - 60226.80 29.92_+/-5.13 31.75 22.23 - 41.28 2065.00 +/- 408.00 2008.00 1317.37 - 2698.63 37.94 +/- 2.42 34.57 17.29 - 51.86 A3-1
Table A-3.
In-house "spike" samples.
Concentration in pCi/La Lab Sample Date Laboratory results Known Control' Code Type Collected Analysis 2s, n=lb Activity Limits SPW-3129 SPAP-3508 SPMI-3232 SPMI-3232 SPMI-3232 SPMI-3232 SPMI-3232 SPSO-3356 SPSO-3356 SPAP-3359 SPW-3376 SPW-3376 SPW-3376 SPW-3377 SPW-3129/1 SPW-3129/1 SPW-3129/2 SPW-3129/2 SPVE-3303 SPSO-5701 SPSO-5701 SPW-5779 SPW-5779 SPW-5779 SPF-5781 SPF-5781 SPW-5937 SPW-59441 SPW-59441 SPAP-5703 SPW-3129/3 Water Air Filter Milk Milk Milk Milk Milk Soil Soil Air Filter Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Vegetation Soil Soil Water Water Water Fish Fish Water Water Water Air Filter Water Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Gr. Beta Gr. Beta Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 1-131 1-131(g)
Sr-90 Co-60 Cs-1 37 Cs-1 37 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Sr-90 1-131 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta 1-131(g)
Co-60 Cs-1 37 Co-60 Cs-1 37 Sr-90 Co-60 Cs-1 37 H-3 Ra-226 Ra-228 Cs-1 37 Gr. Alpha 117.83 +/-2.37 0.80 +/- 0.01 32.69 +/- 6.50 44.20 +/- 9.08 48.05 +/- 0.90 55.64 +/- 11.39 143.77 +/- 3.04 18.49 +/- 0.21 18.71 +/- 0.24 1.80 +/- 0.01 48.17+/-4.85 37.14+/- 3.90 159.84 +/- 3.42 68.60 +/- 2.63 37.94 +/- 2.42 117.83 +/- 2.37 34.42 +/- 2.14 119.99 +/- 2.45 0.81 +/- 0.03 17.42 +/-0.19 16.03 +/- 0.22 250.05+/- 18.63 178.68 +/- 19.89 72.12+/-2.24 1.87 +/- 0.08 1.43+/-0.07 51177.00 +/- 631.00 36.62 +/- 1.74 41.46 +/- 6.44 1.81 +/- 0.02 35.31 +/- 3.04 109.46 0.78 33.96 35.79 56.68 56.68 136.82 19.57 16.61 1.67 45.19 33.96 136.82 85.02 34.57 109.46 34.57 109.46 0.86 19.05 16.52 233.26 175.91 68.12 1.79 1.39 50189.00 34.46 36.06 1.67 34.75 98.51 - 120.41
-9.22 - 10.78 23.96 - 43.96 25.79 - 45.79 45.34 - 68.02 46.68 - 66.68 109.46 - 164.18 9.57 - 29.57 6.61 - 26.61 1.00 - 2.34 35.19 - 55.19 23.96 - 43.96 109.46 - 164.18 68.02 - 102.02 17.29 - 51.86 98.51 - 120.41 17.29 - 51.86 98.51 - 120.41 0.51 -1.20 9.05 - 29.05 6.52 - 26.52 209.93 - 256.59 158.32 -'193.50 54.50 - 81.74 1.07 - 2.51 0.83-1.95 40151.20 - 60226.80 24.12 - 44.80 25.24 - 46.88 1.00 -2.34 17.38 - 52.13 A3-2
Table A-3.
In-house "spike" samples.
Concentration in pCi/La Lab Sample Date Laboratory results Known Control' Code Type Collected Analysis 2s, n=lb Activity Limits SPW-3129/3 Water Jul, 2001 Gr. Beta 113.28+/-3.65 109.46 98.51-120.41 SPMI-6145 Milk Jul, 2001 Cs-1 37 188.45+/-19.10 175.91 158.32 - 193.50 SPW-6604 Water Jul, 2001 Gr. Alpha 35.36 +/- 1.94 34.57 17.29 - 51.86 SPW-6604 Water Jul, 2001 Gr. Beta 112.56 +/- 2.46 108.82 97.94 - 119.70 SPW-9008 Water Oct, 2001 H-3 48285.00+/-606.10 50189.00 40151.20-60226.80 SPAP-9010 Air Filter Oct, 2001 Cs-1 37 1.91 +/- 0.01 1.67 1.00-2.34 SPW-1 0723 Water Dec, 2001 U-233/4 40.12+/-1.09 41.73 25.04 - 58.42 SPW-10723 Water Dec, 2001 U-238 40.16 +/-1.09 41.73 29.21 - 54.25 SPAP-1 1550 Air Filter Dec, 2001 Gr. Beta 1.58 +/-0.02 1.56
-8.44 - 11.56 SPW-11757 Water Dec, 2001 Co-60 43.82+/-3.14 41.36 31.36 - 51.36 SPW-11757 Water Dec, 2001 Cs-134 24.11 +/-2.42 22.59 12.59 - 32.59 SPW-11757 Water Dec, 2001 Cs-137 52.11 +/-4.40 50.89 40.89 - 60.89 SPMI-11759 Milk Dec, 2001 Cs-134 28.03+/-2.64 27.10 17.10- 37.10 SPMI-11759 Milk Dec, 2001 Cs-137 54.59+/- 5.08 50.89 40.89-60.89 SPF-11761 Fish Dec, 2001 Cs-134 0.94+/-0.02 0.90 0.54-1.26 SPF-11761 Fish Dec, 2001 Cs-137 1.43+/- 0.04 1.43 0.86-2.00 "a
All results are in pCi/L, except for elemental potassium (K) in milk, which are in mg/L.; air filter samples, which are in pCi/Filter; and food products, which are in pCi/kg.
b Results are based on single determinations.
c Control limits are based on Attachment A, Page A2 of this report.
NOTE: For fish, Jello is used for the spike matrix. For vegetation, coleslaw is used for the spike matrix.
A3-3
Table A-4.
In-house "blank" samples.
Table A-4.
In-house "blank" samples.
Lab Code SPAP-478 SPAP-478 SPAP-478 SPW-480 SPW-484 SPW-484 SPW-484 SPW-484 SPW-486 SPW-486 SPW-486 SPW-486 SPAP-755 SPW-1038 SPW-1038 SPW-1223 SPW-1223 SPW-1223 SPW-1223 SPMI-1268 SPMI-1268 SPMI-1268 SPW-1271 SPW-1271 SPW-1271 SPVE-1273 SPVE-1273 SPCH-1275 SPW-2164 SPU-3126 Sample Type AIR FILTER AIR FILTER AIR FILTER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER AIR FILTER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER MILK MILK MILK WATER WATER WATER VEGETATION VEGETATION CHARCOAL CANISTER WATER URINE Sample Date Jan 2001 Jan 2001 Jan 2001 Jan 2001 Jan 2001 Jan 2001 Jan 2001 Jan 2001 Jan 2001 Jan 2001 Jan 2001 Jan 2001 Jan 2001 Feb 2001 Feb 2001 Feb 2001 Feb 2001 Feb 2001 Feb 2001 Feb 2001 Feb 2001 Feb 2001 Feb 2001 Feb 2001 Feb 2001 Feb 2001 Feb 2001 Feb 2001 Mar 2001 Apr 2001 Analysis Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 H-3 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Ra-226 Ra-228 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Sr-90 Gr. Beta U-238 U-238 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Ra-226 Ra-228 Cs-134 Cs-137 1-131(g)
Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 1-131(g)
<1.0
<200.0 2.0 ml. sample volume.
A4-1 Concentration pCi/L3.
Laboratory results Acceptance (4.66 Sigma)
Criteria LLD Activity' (4.66 Sigma)
< 1.12
<100.0
< 1.66
<100.0
< 2.46
<100.0
< 162.00
-1.86 +/- 80.40
<200.0
< 0.68
<1.0
< 1.35
<3.2
< 0.02 0.03 +/- 0.01
<1.0
< 0.97 0.43 +/- 0.50
<2.0
< 2.68
<10.0
< 3.46
<10.0
< 5.43
<10.0
< 0.65 0.06 +/- 0.31
<1.0
< 1.60 0.16 +/- 0.90
<3.2
< 0.03
<1.0
< 0.00
<1.0
< 0.46
<1.0
< 1.50
<3.2
< 0.02 0.03 +/- 0.01
<1.0
< 0.95 0.45 +/- 0.49
<2.0
< 5.86
<10.0
< 3.02
<10.0
< 7.46
<20.0
< 1.06
<10.6
< 2.61
<10.0
< 2.37
<10.0
< 10.04
<100.0
< 6.00
<100.0
< 0.01
<9.6
< 0.02
< 642.00 0.05 +/- 0.01
-66.00 +/- 335.00
Table A-4.
In-house "blank" samples.
Lab Concentration pCi/La.
Laboratory results Acceptance Sample Sample (4.66 Sigma)
Criteria Type Date Analysis LLD Activityb (4.66 Sigma)
WATER Apr 2001 WATER Apr 2001 MILK Apr2001 MILK Apr 2001 MILK Apr 2001 MILK Apr 2001 MILK Apr 2001 Sr-90 are still detected in the Lab Code SPDW-3130 SPDW-3130 SPMI-3233 SPMI-3233 SPMI-3233 SPMI-3233 SPMI-3233 Low levels of unusual.
SPSO-3357 SPSO-3357 SPAP-3358 SPW-3375 SPW-3375 SPW-3375 SPW-3375 SPDW-3130 SPDW-3130 SPDW-3130 SPDW-3130 SPVE-3304 SPVE-3304 SPVE-3304 SPSO-5702 SPSO-5702 SPSO-5702 SPAP-5704 SPAP-5704 SPAP-5704 SPW-5780 SPW-5780 SPW-5780 Apr 2001 Apr 2001 Apr 2001 Apr 2001 Apr 2001 Apr 2001 Apr 2001 May 2001 May 2001 Jun 2001 Jun 2001 Jun 2001 Jun 2001 Jun 2001 Jul 2001 Jul 2001 Jul 2001 Jul 2001 Jul 2001 Jul 2001 Jul 2001 Jul 2001 Jul 2001 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Cs-137 1-131 1-131(g)
Sr-89 Sr-90 environment.
Cs-134 Cs-137 Cs-137 Co-60 Cs-134 1-131(g)
Sr-90 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-1 37
< 0.54
< 1.46
< 2.66
< 0.26
< 3.91
< 0.79 A concentration of
< 14.77
< 11.72
< 0.55
< 2.90
< 3.71
< 0.39
< 0.56
< 0.45
< 1.26
< 0.44
< 1.46
< 7.06
< 11.56
< 8.30
< 12.80
< 13.96
<8.10
< 0.79
< 0.84
< 0.60
< 1.86
< 2.46
< 3.77 0.04 +/-0.38 0.67 +/- 1.04
-0.06 +/-0.14
-0.32 +/- 0.79 1.18 +/- 0.35 (1-5 pCi/L) in milk is 0.02 +/- 0.22 0.05 +/- 0.27 0.15 +/-0.34 0.34 +/- 0.95 0.09 +/- 0.32 0.66 +/- 1.04
<1.0
<3.2
<10.0
<0.5
<20.0
<5.0
<1.0 not
.<100.0
<100.0
<100.0
<10.0
<10.0
<20.0
<1.0
<1.0
<3.2
<1.0
<3.2
<100.0
<100.0
<100.0
<100.0
<100.0
<100.0
<100.0
<100.0
<100.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0 A4-2 SOIL SOIL AIR FILTER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER VEGETATION VEGETATION VEGETATION SOIL SOIL SOIL AIR FILTER AIR FILTER AIR FILTER WATER WATER WATER
Table A-4.
In-house "blank" samples.
Concentration pCi/La.
Laboratory results Acceptance Lab Sample Sample (4.66 Sigma)
Criteria Code Type Date Analysis LLD Activity' (4.66 Sigma)
SPF-5782 SPF-5782 SPW-5938 SPW-59451 SPW-59451 SPDW-3130 SPDW-3130 SPMI-6146 FISH FISH WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER MILK Jul 2001 Jul 2001 Jul 2001 Jul 2001 Jul 2001 Jul 2001 Jul 2001 Jul 2001 Co-60 Cs-1 34 H-3 Ra-226 Ra-228 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Sr-90 Low levels of Sr-90 are still detected in the environment.
unusual.
< 5.64
< 7.51
< 163.22
< 0.01
< 0.77
< 0.54
< 2.27
< 0.50 A concentration of
-16.21 0.04 0.70 0.36
-0.78 1.09
+/- 85.07
+/- 0.01
+/- 0.44
+/- 0.40
+/-1.35
+/- 0.36
<100.0
<100.0
<200.0
<1.0
<2.0
<1.0
<3.2
<1.0 (1-5 pCi/L) in milk is not SPW-6605 SPW-9009 SPAP-9011 SPAP-9011 SPW-5780 SPW-1 0724 SPAP-1 1549 SPW-1 1756 SPMI-1 1758 SPMI-1 1758 SPF-1 1760 WATER WATER AIR FILTER AIR FILTER WATER WATER AIR FILTER WATER MILK MILK FISH
" Liquid sample results are reported in pCi/Liter, air filter sample results are in pCi/filter, charcoal sample results are in pCi/charcoal, and solid sample results are in pCi/kilogram.
b The activity reported is the net activity result.
A4-3 Jul 2001 Oct 2001 Oct 2001 Oct 2001 Oct 2001 Dec 2001 Dec 2001 Dec 2001 Dec 2001 Dec 2001 Dec 2001 0.55
-56.70 0.36 0.04 0.01 Gr. Beta H-3 Co-60 Cs-1 37 Sr-90 U-238 Gr. Beta Cs-1 37 Cs-1 37 1-131(g)
+/-1.01
+/- 76.50
+/- 0.30
+/-0.10
+/- 0.00
< 1.34
< 160.00
< 0.76
< 0.58
< 0.54
<0.13
< 0.00
< 2.62
< 4.00
< 16.57
< 7.96
<3.2
<200.0
<100.0
<100.0
<1.0
<1.0
<3.2
<10.0
<10.0
<20.0
<100.0
Table A-5.
In-house "duplicate" samples.
Concentration in pCi/La Lab Sample First Second Averaged Codes DLat AP-10675, 10676 AP-10803, 10804 AP-10833, 10834 WW-51, 52 MI-72, 73 MI-96, 97 U-858, 859 MI-389, 390 DW-879, 880 SWU-813, 814 MI-708, 709 MI-740, 741 MI-740, 741 MI-789, 790 DW-901, 902 SWU-1544, 1545 DW-1426, 1427 DW-1426, 1427 WW-1476, 1477 MI-1523, 1524 MI-1523, 1524 MI-1572, 1573 MI-1572, 1573 SW-648, 1649 MI-1800, 1801 SW-1779, 1780 SW-1779, 1780 MI-1447, 1448 MI-1447, 1448 WW-2115, 2116 SW-1698, 1699 DW-2272, 2273 WW-2356, 2357 AP-2812, 2813 AP-2812, 2813 LW-2217, 2218 Result Result ResUIL Jan, 2001 Jan, 2001 Jan, 2001 Jan, 2001 Jan, 2001 Jan, 2001 Jan, 2001 Jan, 2001 Jan, 2001 Jan, 2001 Feb, 2001 Feb, 2001 Feb, 2001 Feb, 2001 Feb, 2001 Feb, 2001 Feb, 2001 Feb, 2001 Feb, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Analysis Be-7 Be-7 Be-7 H-3 K-40 K-40 Gr. Beta K-40 Gr. Beta Gr. Beta K-40 1-131 K-40 K-40 Gr. Beta Gr. Beta Gr. Beta H-3 H-3 1-131 K-40 K-40 Sr-90 K-40 K-40 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta 1-131 K-40 H-3 Gr. Beta Gr. Beta Gr. Beta Be-7 Be-7 Gr. Beta 0.06 +/- 0.02 0.04 +/- 0.01 0.04 +/- 0.01 362.60 +/- 94.70 1,566.90 +/-196.80 1,418.30+/-117.80 2.17+/-_2.47 1,489.20+/- 141.10 2.63 +/- 0.52 2.48 +/- 0.58 1,179.40+/-103.00 0.01 +/- 0.26 1,434.00 +/- 156.50 1,584.30+/-158.80 4.67 +/- 1.08 3.13+/- 0.63 2.05 +/- 0.92 42.60 +/- 94.23 53.06 +/- 65.79
-0.01 +/- 0.20 1,396.00+/-184.80 1,499.20+/-113.30 1.65+/- 0.44 297.80 +/- 67.20 1,425.80+/-183.30 2.22 +/- 0.73 6.28 +/- 0.74
-0.65 +/- 0.27 1,496.20 +/- 155.40 540.04+/-111.84 6.07+/-1.75 2.10 +/- 0.86 1.22 +/- 0.50 0.07 +/- 0.02 0.07 +/- 0.02 1.85 +/- 0.51 A5-1 0.06 +/- 0.02 0.04 +/- 0.01 0.04 +/- 0.01 417.20 +/- 96.80 1,372.40 +/- 152.50 1,545.70 +/- 162.50 4.23 +/- 2.74 1,463.30 +/- 168.20 2.37 +/- 0.50 2.46 +/- 0.63 1,280.40 +/-90.26
-0.12 +/- 0.26 1,435.00 +/- 126.10 1,390.70 +/-136.50 5.54 +/-1.13 2.33 +/- 0.52 2.34 +/- 0.93 131.31 +/-95.34 53.06 +/- 93.03
-0.10+/-0.37 1,576.00 +/-184.90 1,326.00 +/-118.80 1.51 +/- 0.52 344.80 +/- 82.30 1,372.20+/-119.70 2.14 +/-0.69 6.62 +/- 0.70 0.13 +/-0.55 1,413.40 +/-169.60 500.85 +/- 110.46 5.57 +/-1.85 1.63 +/- 0.83 1.32 +/- 0.47 0.05 +/- 0.01 0.05 +/- 0.01 2.23 +/- 0.55 0.06 +/- 0.01 0.04 +/- 0.01 0.04 +/- 0.01 389.90 +/- 67.71 1,469.65+/-124.49 1,482.00 +/-100.35 3.20+/-1.84 1,476.25+/-109.77 2.50 +/- 0.36 2.47 +/- 0.43 1,229.90 +/- 68.48
-0.05 +/- 0.18 1,434.50 +/-100.49 1,487.50 +/-104.70 5.11 +/- 0.78 2.73 +/- 0.41 2.20 +/- 0.65 86.96 +/- 67.02 53.06 +/- 56.97
-0.06 +/- 0.21 1,486.00 +/- 130.71 1,412.60 +/- 82.08 1.58 +/-0.34 321.30 +/- 53.13 1,399.00 +/- 109.46 2.1,8 +/- 0.50 6.45 +/- 0.51
-0.26 +/- 0.31 1,454.80 +/- 115.01 520.44 +/- 78.59 5.82 +/-1.27 1.87 +/- 0.60 1.27 +/- 0.35 0.06 +/- 0.01 0.06 +/- 0.01 2.04 +/- 0.37
Table A-5.
In-house "duplicate" samples.
Lab Codes AP-2833, 2834 AP-3038, 3039 AP-3038, 3039 DW-2398, 2399 LW-2467, 2468 MI-2446, 2447 AP-3017, 3018 SW-2423, 2424 BS-3103, 3104 SWU-3239, 3240 SS-3322, 3323 W-3990, 3991 BS-4347, 4348 BS-4347, 4348 MI-3364, 3365 SO-3385, 3386 SO-3385, 3386 SO-3385, 3386 CL-4068, 4069 MI-3475, 3476 WW-3545, 3546 MI-3681, 3682 SW-3702, 3703 SW-3702, 3703 BS-4021, 4022 BS-4021, 4022 BS-4021, 4022 BS-4021, 4022 BS-4021, 4022 BS-4021, 4022 BS-4021, 4022 F-3813, 3814 G-4158, 4159 S0-4179, 4180 SO-4179, 4180 SO-4179, 4180 Concentration in pCi/La Sample First Second Averaged uate Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 Apr, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 Analysis Be-7 Be-7 Be-7 Gr. Beta Gr. Beta K-40 Be-7 K-40 Gr. Beta Gr. Beta K-40 Sr-89 K-40 K-40 K-40 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta K-40 K-40 Gr. Beta Gr. Beta K-40 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Cs-1 37 H-3 K-40 Pu-238 Pu-239/40 Ra-226 Sr-90 K-40 Be-7 Ac-228 Bi-214 Cs-1 37 Result Result ResulL 0.04 +/- 0.01 0.07 +/- 0.02 0.06 +/- 0.02 1.58 +/- 0.89 2.52 +/- 0.53 1,285.40+/- 177.10 0.05 +/- 0.01 255.60 +/- 59.80 7.99 +/- 1.80 3.30 +/- 0.60 15.99 +/- 1.08 91.35 +/- 18.94 3,982.40 +/- 489.60 3.26 +/- 0.45 1,325.90 +/-160.20 6.51 +/- 3.09 24.63+/-3.15 19.17+/-1.08 1.09 +/- 0.27 1,297.10 +/- 114.60 1.57 +/- 0.55 1,417.20+/-125.70 4.51 +/- 1.66 8.74 +/- 1.36 224.30 +/- 30.20 842.00 +/- 47.00 21,117.00 +/- 953.00 80.30 +/- 36.50 49.40 +/- 31.80 7,436.00 +/- 577.90 10.60 +/-2.71 2.10 +/-0.17 0.37 +/- 0.13 0.45 +/- 0.13 0.31 +/- 0.06 0.46 +/- 0.05 0.06 +/- 0.02 0.07 +/- 0.02 0.07 +/- 0.01 1.81 +/-0.88 2.42 +/- 0.53 1,376.00 +/-175.90 0.05 +/- 0.01 268.40 +/- 65.40 8.17+/- 1.73 4.30 +/- 0.74 15.59 +/- 1.01 85.29 +/- 23.99 3,255.80 +/- 450.10 3.98 +/- 0.49 1,453.20+/-163.00 9.01 +/- 3.44 28.17+/-3.12 17.94 +/- 0.76 1.13 +/-0.23 1,433.60 +/-156.60 1.36 +/- 0.53 1,496.20 +/-124.50 3.22 +/- 1.55 7.11 +/- 1.38 205.90 +/- 43.00 860.00 +/- 48.00 21,629.00+/-1,357.00 59.50 +/- 22.00 41.10+/-19.60 9,126.00 +/- 751.90 16.80+/- 3.22 2.30+/-0.26 0.41 +/-0.14 0.52 +/-0.14 0.41 +/- 0.06 0.47 +/- 0.04 0.05 +/- 0.01 0.07 +/- 0.01 0.07 +/- 0.01 1.69 +/- 0.63 2.47 +/- 0.37 1,330.70+/-124.81 0.05 +/- 0.00 262.00 +/- 44.31 8.08+/-1.25 3.80 +/- 0.48 15.79 +/- 0.74 88.32+/-15.28 3,619.10+/-332.53 3.62 +/- 0.33 1,389.55 +/- 114.27 7.76 +/- 2.31 26.40 +/- 2.22 18.56 +/- 0.66 1.11 +/-0.18 1,365.35 +/- 97.03 1.47 +/- 0.38 1,456.70 +/- 88.46 3.87+/-1.13 7.93 +/- 0.97 215.10+/-26.27 851.WO +/- 33.59 21,373.00+/- 829.10 69.90 +/- 21.31 45.25 +/- 18.68 8,281.00 +/- 474.16 13.70+/-2.10 2.20 +/- 0.16 0.39 +/- 0.10 0.49 +/- 0.10 0.36 +/- 0.04 0.47 +/- 0.03 A5-2
Table A-5.
In-house "duplicate" samples.
Concentration in pCi/La Lab Sample First Second Averaged Codes DaLe SO-4179, 4180 SO-4179, 4180 SO-4179, 4180 SO-4179, 4180 SO-4179, 4180 BS-4233, 4234 BS-4233, 4234 SWU-4376, 4377 DW-4449, 4450 DW-4397, 4398 MI-4114, 4115 F-4284, 4285 DW-4326, 4327 MI-4470, 4471 SW-4493, 4494 BS-4725, 4726 BS-4725, 4726 BS-4725, 4726 MI-4775, 4776 WW-5110, 5111 G-5085, 5086 G-5085, 5086 MI-5259, 5260 MI-5259, 5260 SWU-5422, 5423 VE-5401, 5402 VE-5401, 5402 AP-5830, 5831 SW-5557, 5558 AP-5851, 5852 SW-5636, 5637 LW-5681, 5682 G-5535, 5536 G-5535, 5536 G-5535, 5536 AP-5788, 5789 Resuit Result mesuIi May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 May, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun, 2001 Jun. 2001 Jun. 2001 Jun, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Analysis Gr. Beta K-40 Pb-212 Ra-226 TI-208 Cs-1 37 K-40 Gr. Beta Gr. Beta Gr. Beta K-40 K-40 Gr. Beta K-40 Gr. Beta Co-60 Cs-137 K-40 K-40 H-3 Be-7 K-40 K-40 Sr-90 Gr. Beta Gr. Beta K-40 Be-7 Gr. Beta Be-7 Gr. Beta Gr. Beta Be-7 Gr. Beta K-40 Be-7 26.65 +/- 2.63 16.35 +/- 0.86 0.35 +/- 0.04 0.56 +/- 0.98 0.14 +/- 0.03 0.03 +/- 0.01 8.18 +/- 0.48 2.58 +/- 0.55 2.83 +/- 0.55 9.13+/-1.26 1,325.90 +/- 118.80 2.23 +/- 0.32 2.60 +/- 0.97 1,514.50+/-116.60 4.05 +/-1.23 112.00 +/- 24.30 3,083.10+/-100.10 8,143.70 +/- 640.40 1,362.20 +/- 71.80 1,173.50+/-129.10 0.89+/-0.17 5.13+/- 0.39 1,529.70+/-122.70 1.69 +/- 0.42 2.59 +/- 0.54 8.12 +/-0.24 6.55+/- 0.52 0.08 +/- 0.01 5.43 +/- 1.70 0.07 +/- 0.02 4.75 +/- 1.38 2.42 +/- 0.37 0.99 +/- 0.29 7.62 +/- 0.12 7.26 +/- 1.03 0.08 +/- 0.02 A5-3 24.68 +/- 2.52 16.05 +/- 0.82 0.43 +/- 0.05 1.03 +/- 0.31 0.17+/- 0.03 0.03 +/- 0.02 7.80 +/- 0.58 2.94 +/- 0.58 3.74 +/- 0.65 10.20 +/-1.34 1,394.70+/- 133.10 2.12 +/- 0.35 1.47 +/- 0.83 1,456.80 +/-130.90 4.64 +/- 1.32 84.50 +/- 8.70 3,094.80 +/- 35.30 8,083.80 +/- 225.10 1,363.90 +/- 73.40 1,046.80+/- 125.20 1.14+/-0.39 5.22 +/- 0.70 1,406.20+/-123.80 1.71 +/- 0.44 1.91 +/- 0.52 8.88 +/- 0.26 6.26 +/- 0.65 0.08 +/- 0.01 5.96 +/- 1.56 0.07 +/- 0.02 4.18+/- 1.34 2.18 +/- 0.34 0.97 +/- 0.54 7.72 +/- 0.12 7.64 +/- 0.93 0.07 +/- 0.02 25.67 +/- 1.82 16.20 +/- 0.59 0.39 +/- 0.03 0.79 +/- 0.51 0.15+/-_0.02 0.03 +/- 0.01 7.99 +/- 0.38 2.76 +/- 0.40 3.29 +/- 0.43 9.66 +/- 0.92 1,360.30 +/- 89.20 2.18+/-0.24 2.04 +/- 0.64 1,485.65 +/- 87.65 4.35 +/- 0.90 98.25+/- 12.91 3,088.95 +/- 53.07 8,113.75+/-339.40 1,363.05 +/- 51.34 1,110.15 89.92 1.02 +/- 0.21 5.17+/-0.40 1,467.95 +/- 87.15 1.70 +/- 0.30 2.25 +/- 0.37 8.50 +/- 0.18 6.40 +/- 0.42 0.08 +/- 0.01 5.70 +/- 1.15 0.07 +/- 0.01 4.47 +/- 0.96 2.30 +/- 0.25 0.98 +/- 0.31 7.67 +/- 0.08 7.45 +/- 0.69 0.08 +/- 0.01
Table A-5.
In-house "duplicate" samples.
Concentration in pCi/La Lab Sample First Second Averaged AP-5872, 5873 AP-5893, 5894 AP-5809, 5810 SW-5724, 5725 SW-5724, 5725 SW-5767, 5768 LW-5920, 5921 SO-6172, 6173 SO-6172, 6173 SO-6172, 6173 MI-6353, 6354 SW-6376, 6377 VE-6424, 6425 VE-6424, 6425 MI-6445, 6446 LW-6489, 6490 MI-6533, 6534 DW-6835, 6836 MI-6693, 6694 MI-6693, 6694 WW-6952, 6953 MI-6906, 6907 VE-6973, 6974 LW-7851, 7852 MI-7001, 7002 MI-7073, 7074 LW-7145, 7146 MI-7221, 7222 MI-7221, 7222 SWU-7527, 7528 VE-7485, 7486 DW-7506, 7507 MI-7622, 7623 MI-7664, 7665 MI-7876, 7877 G-7960, 7961 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Jul, 2001 Aug, 2001 Aug, 2001 Aug, 2001 Aug, 2001 Aug, 2001 Aug, 2001 Aug, 2001 Aug, 2001 Aug, 2001 Aug, 2001 Aug, 2001 Aug, 2001 Aug, 2001 Aug, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Codes U,ý Analysis Be-7 Be-7 Be-7 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta 1-131 Gr. Beta Cs-1 37 K-40 Sr-90 K-40 1-131 Gr. Beta K-40 K-40 Gr. Beta K-40 Gr. Beta K-40 Sr-90 Gr. Beta K-40 K-40 Gr. Beta K-40 K-40 Gr. Beta K-40 Sr-90 Gr. Beta K-40 Gr. Beta K-40 K-40 K-40 Be-7 A5-4 0.07 +/- 0.02 0.08 +/- 0.02 0.07 +/- 0.02 2.95 +/- 0.70 8.79 +/- 0.71 0.79 +/- 0.31 3.06 +/- 0.64 0.30 +/- 0.05 18.20+/-1.08 0.03 +/- 0.01 966.35 +/- 82.28 0.58+/-0.16 2.52 +/- 0.05 3.04 +/- 0.26 1,407.40 + 97.10 2.61 +/- 0.57 1,498.60 +/-113.90 2.01 +/- 0.59 1,294.30 +118.70 1.47 +/- 0.42 5.49 +/- 0.69 1,613.80 +/- 218.50 4.21 +/-0.24 2.20 +/- 0.48 1,453.80+/-148.10 1,217.30 +/- 80.83 2.77 +/- 0.53 1,192.90 +/- 95.40 2.10+/--0.48 17.51 +/- 3.06 2.12+/- 0.47 4.25+/-1.18 1,340.10+/- 111.10 1,408.10 +/-102.70 1,416.40 +/-192.30 1.27 +/- 0.21 0.08 +/- 0.02 0.08 +/- 0.01 0.06 +/- 0.01 2.89 +/- 0.60 8.21 +/--0.65 0.61 +/- 0.26 3.15+/- 0.58 0.32 +/- 0.04 17.55 +/- 0.82 0.05 +/- 0.02 986.31 +/- 91.91 0.81 +/--0.17 2.49 +/- 0.05 3.12 +/-0.37 1,442.20 +/- 189.60 2.79 +/- 0.54 1,375.50 +/-129.60 2.36 +/- 0.63 1,417.30 +/- 176.50 1.23 +/- 0.41 5.80 +/- 0.69 1,532.70 +/- 135.80 4.29 +/- 0.64 2.12+/--0.42 1,285.30+/- 190.50 1,218.30-+/-99.13 3.60 +/- 0.59 1,388.90 +/-132.70 1.72 +/- 0.47 20.36 +/- 3.31 2.47 +/- 0.34 4.13+/--1.12 1,290.80 +/- 116.50 1,396.90 +/- 114.30 1,318.00+/- 155.50 1.25 +/- 0.25 0.07 +/- 0.01 0.08 +/- 0.01 0.06 +/- 0.01 2.92 +/- 0.46 8.50 +/- 0.48 0.70 +/- 0.20 3.11 +/- 0.43 0.31 +/- 0.03 17.88 +/- 0.68 0.04 +/- 0.01
-976.33 +/- 61.68 0.70 +/- 0.12 2.51 +/- 0.03 3.08 +/- 0.23 1,424.80 +/- 106.51 2.70 +/- 0.39 1,437.05 +/- 86.27 2.19+/-0.43 1,355.80 +/-106.35 1.35 +/- 0.29 5.64 +/- 0.49 1,573.25+/- 128.63 4.25 +/- 0.34 2.16+/-0.32 1,369.55+/-120.65 1,217.80 +/- 63.95 3.19+/-0.39 1,290.90 +/- 81.72 1.91 +/- 0.34 18.93 +/- 2.25 2.30 +/- 0.29 4.19+/-_0.81 1,315.45 +/- 80.49 1,402.50 +/- 76.83 1,367.20 +/- 123.65 1.26 +/-0.16 KesUlt KesUIL resul
Table A-5.
In-house "duplicate" samples.
Concentration in pCi/L' Lab Sample First Second Averaged Codes LJa~
G-7960, 7961 F-8011, 8012 F-8011, 8012 F-8011, 8012 MI-8149, 8150 MI-8343, 8344 VE-8319, 8320 VE-8319, 8320 AP-9069, 9070 AP-9566, 9567 VE-8700, 8701 VE-8700, 8701 VE-8700, 8701 AP-9048, 9049 DW-8636, 8637 DW-8615, 8616 AP-9090, 9091 AP-9166, 9167 AP-9187, 9188 VE-10562, 10563 VE-1 0562, 10563 WW-8636, 8637 DW-8894, 8895 MI-9232, 9233 VE-9518, 9519 WW-1 0257, 10258 VE-10333, 10334 VE-10333, 10334 MI-10588, 10589 DW-10688, 10689 WW-1 0905, 10906 SS-1 0953, 10954 SS-10953, 10954 SS-10953, 10954 SS-10953, 10954 SS-10953, 10954 ResuIt IResult esult Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Oct, 2001 Oct, 2001 Oct, 2001 Oct, 2001 Oct, 2001 Oct, 2001 Oct, 2001 Oct, 2001 Oct, 2001 Oct, 2001 Oct, 2001 Oct, 2001 Oct, 2001 Oct, 2001 Oct, 2001 Nov, 2001 Nov, 2001 Nov, 2001 Nov, 2001 Nov, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Analysis K-40 Cs-1 37 Gr. Beta K-40 K-40 K-40 Gr. Beta K-40 Be-7 Be-7 Be-7 K-40 Sr-90 Be-7 Gr. Beta Gr. Beta Be-7 Be-7 Be-7 Be-7 K-40 Gr. Beta Gr. Beta K-40 K-40 H-3 Be-7 K-40 K-40 Gr. Beta H-3 Ac-228 Bi-214 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-1 37 5.21 +/- 0.57 0.06 +/- 0.02 3.68+/- 0.12 3.47 +/- 0.49 1,551.70+/- 118.00 1,550.30 +/- 170.60 3.37+/- 0.10 2.14+/-_0.46 0.07 +/- 0.02 0.08 +/- 0.02 0.24+/- 0.10 2.03 +/- 0.24 0.01 +/- 0.00 0.07 +/- 0.01 4.74+/-1.06 4.65 +/- 0.58 0.07 +/- 0.01 0.08 +/- 0.02 0.07 +/- 0.01 309.90+/- 158.80 6,407.10 +/- 620.70 5.08+/-1.20 4.28 +/- 0.89 1,440.70 +/- 46.60 1.91 +/- 0.22 755.90 +/- 102.50 0.68 +/- 0.26 6.10+/- 0.72 1,428.40+/-114.70 3.49 +/- 0.91 233.90 +/- 90.60 1.10+/- 0.25 0.69 +/- 0.08 0.21 +/- 0.05 0.93 +/- 0.06 0.13 +/- 0.03 A5-5 5.70 +/- 0.63 0.04 +/- 0.02 3.50+/-0.11 3.38 +/- 0.47 1,489.90 +/- 123.60 1,368.10+/-126.70 3.42+/-0.11 2.24 +/- 0.37 0.07 +/- 0.01 0.09 +/- 0.03 0.19+/- 0.10 2.03 +/- 0.21 0.01 +/- 0.00 0.07 +/- 0.00 5.08 +/- 1.21 4.28 +/- 0.54 0.07 +/- 0.01 0.08 +/- 0.02 0.05 +/- 0.01 348.30 +/-168.10 6,057.50 +/- 660.40 4.74 +/- 1.06 3.40 +/- 0.90 1,424.80 +/- 76.40 1.97 +/- 0.39 684.70 +/- 99.90 0.99 +/- 0.26 5.83 +/- 0.72 1,445.50 +/- 129.40 2.36 +/- 0.76 226.30 +/- 90.20 0.91 +/- 0.16 0.75 +/- 0.08 0.18+/- 0.04 0.94 +/- 0.06 0.16+/- 0.03 5.45 +/- 0.43 0.05+/-0.01 3.59 +/- 0.08 3.43 +/- 0.34 1,520.80 +/- 85.44 1,459.20 +/- 106.25 3.39 +/- 0.07 2.19+/-0.29 0.07 +/- 0.01 0.09 +/- 0.02 0.22 +/- 0.07 2.03 +/-0.16 0.01 +/- 0.00 0.07 +/- 0.01 4.91 +/- 0.80 4.47 +/- 0.40 0.07 +/- 0.01 0.08 +/- 0.01 0.06 +/- 0.01 329.10 +/-115.62 6,232.30 +/- 453.15 4.91 +/- 0.80 3.84 +/- 0.63 1,432.75 +/- 44.75 1.94 +/- 0.22 720.30 +/- 71.57 0.84 +/- 0.18 5.97 +/- 0.51 1,436.95 +/- 86.46 2.93 +/- 0.60 230.10+/- 63.92 1.00+/-0.15 0.72 +/- 0.06 0.19_+/-0.03 0.93 +/- 0.04 0.14 +/-0.02
Table A-5.
In-house "duplicate" samples.
Concentration in pCi/La Lab Sample First Second Averaged Codes Date Analysis Result Result Result SS-10953, 10954 SS-1 0953, 10954 SS-10953, 10954 SS-10953, 10954 SS-10953, 10954 MI-11033, 11034 MI-11033, 11034 AP-11888, 11889 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 Dec, 2001 K-40 Pb-212 Pb-214 Ra-226 TI-208 K-40 Sr-90 Be-7 9.91 +/- 0.83 0.94 +/- 0.05 0.83 +/- 0.08 1.76 +/- 0.37 0.34 +/- 0.05 1,339.80+/-128.70 1.31 +/- 0.41 0.06 +/- 0.02 8.36 +/- 0.80 0.91 +/- 0.06 0.82 +/- 0.07 1.67 +/- 0.37 0.31 +/- 0.05 1,435.80 +/- 117.30 1.38 +/- 0.37 0.06 +/- 0.02 9.13 +/-0.57 0.92 +/- 0.04 0.83+/-0.05 1.72 +/- 0.26 0.32 +/- 0.04 1,387.80 +/- 87.07 1.35+/-0.28 0.06 +/- 0.01 Duplicate analyses are performed on every twentieth sample received in-house.
Results are not listed for those analyses with activities that measure below the LLD.
" Results are reported in units of pCi/L, except for elemental potassium (K) in milk (mg/L), air filters (pCi/Filter), food products and vegetation (pCi/g), soil and sediments (pCi/kg).
A5-6
Table A-6.
Department of Energy's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)a.
Concentrationb Lab Sample Date MAPEP Resultd Control Code Type Collected Analysis Laboratory result' 1s, N=1 Limits STSO-923 Included STSO-923 STSO-923 STSO-923 STSO-923 STSO-923 STSO-923 STSO-923 STSO-923 STSO-923 STSO-923 STSO-923 STSO-923 SOIL Jan, 2001 Am-241 in the testing series as a "false positive". No SOIL Jan, 2001 Co-57 SOIL Jan, 2001 Co-60 SOIL Jan, 2001 Cs-134 SOIL Jan, 2001 Cs-1 37 SOIL Jan, 2001 K-40 SOIL Jan, 2001 Mn-54 SOIL Jan, 2001 Pu-238 SOIL Jan, 2001 Pu-239/40 SOIL Jan, 2001 Sr-90 SOIL Jan, 2001 U-233/4 SOIL Jan, 2001 U-238 SOIL Jan, 2001 Zn-65 0.0-2.6 activity expected. Result of analysis; < 0.8 Bq/L.
100.2 +/- 3.5 1,285.1 +/- 5.3 81.1 +/-1.8 1,210.6 +/- 6.6 732.6 +/- 21.2 212.6 +/- 6.7 110.7+/- 7.2 79.6+/- 5.9 159.8 +/- 9.5 45.0 +/- 3.9 165.6 +/- 7.4 428.5+/- 10.9 103.0+/- 10.3 1,270.0+/- 127.0 91.1+/-_9.1 1,240.0+/- 124.0 652.0+/- 65.2 203.0+/- 20.3 115.0+/- 11.5 83.4+/- 8.3 209.0+/- 20.9 60.0+/- 6.0 191.0+/- 19.1 382.0+/- 38.2 72.1 - 133.9 889.0- 1,651.0 63.8-118.4 868.0- 1,612.0 456.4 - 847.6 142.1 - 263.9 80.5-149.5 58.4-108.4 146.3 - 271.7 42.0 - 78.0 133.7 - 248.3 267.4 - 496.6 a
Results obtained by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the Department of Energy's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program, Idaho Operations office, Idaho Falls, Idaho.
b All results are in Bq/kg or BqIL as requested by the Department of Energy.
c MAPEP results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determination) and control limits as defined by the MAPEP.
A6-1
Table A-7.
Environmental Measurements Laboratory Quality Assessment Program (EML)y.
Lab Sample Code Type STSO-904 SOIL STSO-904 SOIL STSO-904 SOIL Naturally-occurring radium of the higher bias seen for STSO-904 SOIL STSO-904 SOIL STSO-904 SOIL STSO-904 SOIL STSO-904 SOIL STSO-904 SOIL STSO-904 SOIL STW-905 WATER STW-905 WATER STW-905 WATER STW-905 WATER STW-905 WATER STW-905 WATER STW-905 WATER STW-905 WATER STW-905 WATER STW-906 WATER STW-906 WATER STAP-907 AIR FILTER STAP-907 AIR FILTER STAP-907 AIR FILTER STAP-907 AIR FILTER STAP-907 AIR FILTER STAP-907 AIR FILTER STAP-907 AIR FILTER Concentration Date Control Collected Analysis Laboratory result EML Resultc Limits4 Mar, 2001 Ac-228 45.60 +/-4.0 42.70 Mar, 2001 Am-241 14.40+/-0.5 14.80 Mar, 2001 Bi-212 53.20+/- 3.1 42.00 and thorium daughters are present in the shield background, and isotopes of lead and bismuth.
Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Bi-214 Cs-1 37 K-40 Pb-212 Pb-214 Pu-239/40 Sr-90 Am-241 Co-60 Cs-1 37 H-3 Pu-238 Pu-239140 Sr-90 U-23314 U-238 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Am-241 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Mn-54 Pu-238 Pu-239/40 42.10+/- 7.7 1,772.60 +/-79.8 583.80 +/- 52.6 46.60 +/- 8.5 45.30 +/- 8.6 26.00 +/- 0.8 55.60 +/- 2.2 2.15+/-0.1 97.00 +/- 0.8 70.10+/-4.0 76.50 +/- 5.5 1.69 +/- 0.1 1.69 +/- 0.1 3.85 +/- 0.1 0.90 +/- 0.1 0.88 +/- 0.1 1,724.60 +/-141.7 1,246.40 +/-31.1 0.47 +/- 0.0 20.11 +/-0.2 2.71 +/-0.2 9.86 +/- 0.2 7.25+/-0.2 0.23 +/- 0.0 0.12 +/- 0.0 0.80- 1.50 0.63 - 2.64 0.45-1.23 a probable cause 32.60 0.78-1.50 1,740.00 468.00 41.50 34.30 25.60 69.00 1.67 98.20 73.00 79.30 1.58 1.64 4.40 1.04 1.04 1,900.00 1,297.00 0.49 19.44 2.83 8.76 6.52 0.22 0.14 0.80- 1.29 0.80- 1.37 0.74-1.36 0.76-1.53 0.71-1.33 0.61 - 3.91 0.76-1.48 0.80- 1.20 0.80- 1.20 0.74 - 2.29 0.74-1.22 0.75-1.26 0.64-1.50 0.80- 1.40 0.80- 1.29 a.58-1.26 0.56-1.50 0.69 - 2.40 0.79 - 1.30 0.74-1.21 0.78 - 1.35 0.80- 1.36 0.66-1.35 0.69-1.29 A7-1
Table A-7.
Environmental Measurements Laboratory Quality Assessment Program (EML)3.
Concentration b Lab Sample Date Control Code Collected Analysis Laboratory result CIVIL r*eUiL LiIIILS STAP-907 STAP-907 STAP-907 STAP-908 STAP-908 STVE-909 STVE-909 STVE-909 STVE-909 STVE-909 STVE-909 STVE-909 STW-925 STW-925 STW-925 STW-925 STW-925 STW-925 STW-925 STW-925 STW-925 STW-926 STW-926 STSO-927 STSO-927 STSO-927 STSO-927 STSO-927 STSO-927 Code Type AIR FILTER AIR FILTER AIR FILTER AIR FILTER AIR FILTER VEGETATION VEGETATION VEGETATION VEGETATION VEGETATION VEGETATION VEGETATION WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Mar, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sr-90 U-233/4 U-238 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Am-241 Cm-244 Co-60 Cs-1 37 K-40 Pu-239/40 Sr-90 Am-241 Co-60 Cs-1 37 H-3 Ni-63 Pu-238 Pu-239/40 Sr-90 Uranium Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Ac-228 Am-241 Bi-212 Bi-214 Cs-1 37 K-40 A7-2 7.41 +/-0.2 0.05 +/- 0.0 0.05 +/- 0.0 2.66 +/- 0.0 2.30 +/- 0.0 6.10+/-_0.2 3.50 +/- 0.5 28.50 +/- 2.1 795.50 +/- 76.4 592.60 +/- 42.5 8.50 +/- 0.6 1,239.60 +/- 130.0 0.70 +/- 0.1 206.70 +/-4.7 46.60 +/- 0.8 254.10_+/-3.6 50.90 +/- 3.0 1.10-+/-0.1 1.60 +/- 0.1 4.10+/-0.3 2.20 +/- 0.2 1,220.00 +/- 32.0 8,461.00 +/- 206.0 68.10+/-1.4 5.20 +/- 1.3 65.10+/-1.6 47.30 +/- 4.7 659.20+/-10.8 737.70 +/-16.6 7.10 0.05 0.05 3.97 2.58 6.17 3.69 30.40 842.00 603.00 9.58 1,330.00 0.76 209.00 45.13 207.00 45.25 1.09 1.63 3.73 2.37 1,150.00 7,970.00 59.57 4.43 62.07 36.90 612.33 623.33 0.55 - 2.05 0.80- 1.92 0.80- 1.59 0.57-1.47 0.76-1.52 0.72 - 2.34 0.61 - 1.61 0.75-1.51 0.80- 1.37 0.78-1.43 0.67-1.49 0.52-1.23 0.76-1.48 0.80-1.20 0.80- 1.24 0.74 - 2.29 0.70- 1.30 0.74-1.22 0.75-1.26 0.64-1.50 0.73-1.37 0.58-1.26 0.56-1.50 0.80- 1.50 0.63 - 2.64 0.45-1.23 0.78 - 1.50 0.80- 1.29 0.80- 1.37
Table A-7.
Environmental Measurements Laboratory Quality Assessment Program (EML)a.
Concentration Lab Sample Date Control Code Type Collected Analysis Laboratory result EML Result' Limitsd STSO-927 STSO-927 STSO-927 STSO-927 STSO-927 STVE-928 STVE-928 STVE-928 STVE-928 STVE-928 STVE-928 STVE-928 STAP-929 STAP-929 STAP-929 STAP-929 STAP-929 STAP-929 STAP-929 STAP-929 STAP-929 STAP-930 STAP-930 SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL VEGETATION VEGETATION VEGETATION VEGETATION VEGETATION VEGETATION VEGETATION AIR FILTER AIR FILTER AIR FILTER AIR FILTER AIR FILTER AIR FILTER AIR FILTER AIR FILTER AIR FILTER AIR FILTER AIR FILTER Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Sep, 2001 Pb-212 Pb-214 Pu-239/40 Sr-90 Uranium Am-241 Cm-244 Co-60 Cs-1 37 K-40 Pu-239/40 Sr-90 Am-241 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Mn-54 Pu-238 Pu-239/40 Sr-90 Uranium Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta
" The Environmental Measurements Laboratory provides the following nuclear species : Air Filters,
- Soil, Vegetation and Water.
b Results are reported in Bq/L with the following exceptions: Air Filter results are reported in Bq/Filter, Soil results are reported in Bq/Kg, Vegetation results are reported in Bq/Kg.
c The EML result listed is the mean of replicate determinations for each nuclide+/-the standard error of the mean.
dControl limits are reported by EML as the ratio of Reported Value / EML value.
A7-3 64.70 +/- 3.8 53.70 +/- 7.7 9.30 +/- 2.9 27.40 +/- 6.3 155.60 +/- 7.8 7.00 +/- 0.3 4.30 +/- 0.8 40.20 +/- 0.9 1,184.00+/-2.8 1,023.00+/-44.1 8.90 +/- 1.4 1,364.00 +/- 18.4 0.09 +/- 30.0 16.90+/- 0.3 11.80 +/- 0.2 18.30+/-0.3 85.40 +/- 1.3 0.05 +/- 0.0 0.22 +/- 0.0 3.11 +/-0.1 0.24-+/-0.1 6.30+/-0.1 13.80+/-0.1 58.33 39.67 8.95 30.60 194.23 6.92 4.31 35.30 1,030.00 898.67 11.02 1,612.80 0.09 17.50 12.95 17.10 81.15 0.07 0.23 3.48 0.22 5.36 12.77 0.74-1.36 0.76-1.53 0.71 - 1.33 0.61 - 3.91 0.62-1.35 0.72 - 2.34 0.61 - 1.61 0.75-1.51 0.80- 1.37 0.78-1.43 0.67-1.49 0.52-1.23 0.69 - 2.40 0.79-1.30 0.74-1.21 0.78 - 1.35 0.80- 1.36 0.66-1.35 0.69-1.29 0.55 - 2.05 0.80 - 2.54 0.57-1.47 0.76-1.52
Appendix B Summary Tables in the format of NRC Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position Revision 1, November 1979 Page B-1
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Name of Facility: Wolf Creek Generating Station Docket No.: 50-482 Location of Facility: Coffey County, Kansas Reporting Period: Annual 2001 Medium of ODCM All Indicator Indicator Location with Control Locations Pathway Analysis and Lower Locations Highest Annual Mean Number of Sampled Total Number of Limit of Name Nonroutine (Unit of Analysis Performed Detection
- Mean (f)
Distance and
- Mean (f)
- Mean (f)
Reported Measurement)
(LLD)
- Range Direction
- Range
- Range Measurements **
Air Particulate (pCi/m3)
External Radiation (mR/day)
Surface Water (pCi/I)
Ground Water (pCi/I)
Gross Beta (260)
Gamma (20)
Be-7 1-131 (260)
TLD (376)
Gamma (34)
Tritium (34) 1-131 (20)
Gamma (20)
.029 (208/208)
(.012-.055) 0.075 (16/16)
(0.06-0.099) 70
- (0/208) 0.232 (360/360)
(0.132-0.488)
-(0/17) 3000 1
3000 12501 (17/17)
(10648-15726)
-(0/16)
-(0/16)
-(0/16) 37 2.1 miles NNW 32 3.2 miles WNW N/A 47
.16 miles S N/A DC 0.6 miles WNW N/A N/A N/A
.029 (52/52)
(.012-.053) 0.079 (4/4)
(0.07-0.09)
N/A 0.304 (8/8)
(0.203-0.488)
N/A 12760 (12/12)
(10648-15726)
N/A N/A N/A Station No. 40
.028 (52/52)
(.012-.057) 0.073 (4/4)
(0.06-0.087)
- (0/52)
Stations 39 & 40 0.215 (16/16)
(0.173-0.241)
MUSH & JRR
-(0/17)
-(0/17)
B-1 2
-(0/4)
-(0/4)
-(0/4)
- Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f)
(C CD,w 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Name of Facility:
Location of Facility:
Wolf Creek Generating Station Docket No.: 50-482 Coffey County, Kansas Reporting Period: Annual 2001 Medium of ODCM All Indicator Indicator Location with Control Locations Pathway Analysis and Lower Locations Highest Annual Mean Number of Sampled Total Number of Limit of Name Nonroutine (Unit of Analysis Performed Detection
- Mean (f)
Distance and
- Mean (f)
- Mean (f)
Reported Measurement)
(LLD)
- Range Direction
- Range
- Range Measurements **
1-131 (26)
Gross Beta (26)
Gamma (26)
Tritium (8)
Gamma (5) 1
-(0-13) 4 2000 K-40 Gamma (14)
Gamma (20)
Be-7 K-40 4.1 (13/13)
(3.5-5.6)
-(0/13)
-(0/4) 10419 (3/3)
(9376-10947) 3255 (8/8)
(2852-3687) 6457 (8/8)
(3944-8365) 452 (9/13)
(309-733) 4531 (13/13)
(3311-6407)
N/A LW-40
>10.0 miles SSE N/A N/A DC 0.6 miles WNW WCL 0.6 miles WCL 0.6 miles G-1 1.6 miles SE A-2 4.9 miles N N/A 4.1 (13/13)
(3.5-5.6)
N/A N/A 10941 (2/2)
(10935-10947) 3255 (8/8)
(2852-3687) 6457 (8/8)
(3944-8365) 464 (3/6)
(398-520) 5028 (7/7)
(3874-6407)
BW-15
-(0/13) 4.3 (13/13)
(3.4-5.1)
-(0/13)
-(0/4)
JRR 10912 (2/2)
(10581-11243)
JRR 3105 (6/6)
(2945-3215)
-(0/6)
S-4 620 (6/7)
(328-1235) 3505 (7/7)
(2318-7340)
- Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f)
Drinking Water (pCi/I)
CD CO wO Shoreline Sediment (pCi/kg dry)
Fish (pCi/kg wet) 0 0
0 0
0 Broadleaf Vegetation (pCi/kg wet) 0 0
0 0
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Name of Facility: Wolf Creek Generating Station Docket No.: 50-482 Location of Facility: Coffey County, Kansas Reporting Period: Annual 2001 Medium of ODCM All Indicator Indicator Location with Control Locations Pathway Analysis and Lower Locations Highest Annual Mean Number of Sampled Total Number of Limit of Name Nonroutine (Unit of Analysis Performed Detection
- Mean (f)
Distance and
- Mean (f)
- Mean (f)
Reported Measurement)
(LLD)
- Range Direction
- Range
- Range Measurements **
Gamma (2) 10264 (2/2)
(3289-17240)
NR-D2
>10 miles S 10264 (2/2)
(3289-17240) 12817 (6/6)
(10918-14100) 418 (3/6)
(273-565) 59.1 (1/6) 206 (6/6)
(108-296) 515.5 (2/3)
(348-683) 3781 (3/3)
(2490-4155.8)
DC 0.6 miles WNW DC 0.6 miles WNW UHS 0.6 miles E DC 0.6 miles WNW MUDS 1.5 miles WNW WCL 0.6 miles WNW 13635 (3/3)
(12949-14100) 418 (3/3)
(273-565) 59.1 (1/3) 254 (3/3)
(211-296) 683(1/1) 4155.8 (1/1)
JRR 18805 (2/2)
(17424-20186)
-(0/2)
-(0/2) 212 (2/2)
(173-251)
No Control
- Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f)
Crops (pCi/kg wet)
Gamma (8)
Bottom Sediment (pCi/kg dry)
"(D (D
K-40 No Control Samples 0
Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Aquatic Vegetation (pCi/kg wet)
Gamma (3)
Be-7 K-40 0
0 0
0 0
0 I
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
Name of Facility:
Location of Facility:
Wolf Creek Generating Station Docket No.: 50-482 Coffey County, Kansas Reporting Period: Annual 2001 Medium of ODCM All Indicator Indicator Location with Control Locations Pathway Analysis and Lower Locations Highest Annual Mean Number of Sampled Total Number of Limit of Name Nonroutine (Unit of Analysis Performed Detection
- Mean (f)
Distance and
- Mean (f)
- Mean (f)
Reported Measurement)
(LLD)
- Range Direction
- Range
- Range Measurements **
No Control 1450 (2/2)
(529-2371) 6027.5 (2/2)
(5442-6613) 10651.7 (3/3)
(9578-11465) 216.6 (3/3)
(127-295.9)
MUDS 1.5 miles WNW EEA 3.0 miles NNW Q-1 1.0 miles NW MUDS 1.5 miles WNW 2371 (1/1) 6613(1/1) 0 0
No Control 11465(1/1) 295.9(1/1) 0 0
- Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f)
Terrestrial Vegetation (pCi/kg wet)
Gamma (2)
Be-7 K-40 Soil (pCi/kg dry)
"-u
(-1 Gamma (3)
K-40 Cs-1 37