L-87-522, Forwards mgt-on-shift Weekly Repts,Per NRC 871019 Order
| ML17342B058 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 12/16/1987 |
| From: | Woody C FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| L-87-522, NUDOCS 8712280273 | |
| Download: ML17342B058 (63) | |
Text
REGUL RY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTI 'YSTEM (BIDS) r ACCESSION NBR:8712280273 DOC. DATE: 87/12/ib NOTARIZED:
NO DOCKET 0 FACIL: 50-250 Turkey Point Plant.
Unit 3i Florida Power and Light C 05000250 50-251 Turkey Point Planti Unit 4i Florida Power and Light C 05000251 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MOODY> C. O.
Florida Power 5 Light Co.
RECIP. NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION GRACEa J. N.
Region 2i Ofc o0 the Director
SUBJECT:
Forwards mgt-on-shift eeeklg reptsi per NRC 871019 order.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
D03bD COPIES RECEIVED: LTR ENCL SIZE:
TITLE: Turkey Point Management OnshiFt Program NOTES:
REC IP IENT ID CODE/NAME DRP/ADR-2 PD2-2 PD INTERNAL:
AEOD NRR DEPY NRR MORISSEAUi D NRR/ADT NRR/DOEA DIR NR R /P MAS/ILR8 OGC/HDS2 RGN2 FILE EXTERNAL:
LPDR NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR/DRP-1/2 McDONALDe D DEDRO NRR DIR NRR/ADP NRR/DLPG/PEB NRR/DRIS DIR OE ERMANe J EG FIL 01 NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 2
2 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 23 ENCL 23
0 N
I l
l
)
I'
P.
OX 14000, JUNO BEACH, FL 33408.0420 y4)fig/
+//II> '~
AEGEMBER 2 6 1987 L-87-522 Dr. J. Nelson Grace Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Re:
Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 Mana ement-on-Shift Weekl Re ort
Dear Dr. Grace:
Pursuant to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Order dated October 19, 1987, the attached summary of Management-on-Shift (MOS) reports is submitted.
Should there be any questions on this information, please contact us.
tf Very truly yours, C. O. Woo Hxecutiv ce President COW/SDF/cn Attachment cc:
J. Lieberman, Director, Office of Enforcement, USNRC D. G. McDonald, Project Manager, NRR, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant R. H. Talion, President, FPL 87imeo~7~ 8soooasa 7i2i6
,PDR
>DOCK
@DR
.8'OS001 goo<
/I PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE
1 4 V e
~
k-l
MA GEMENT ON SHIFT OS) yyEEKLY
SUMMARY
REPORT WEEK STARTING PAGE 1
OF Four MOS observers were on shift:
K.J. Wtecek, St. Lucfe Plant (12/07-14,
- 1987, Day);
William Detwfler, Westinghouse Blectrfc Corporation (12/07-14, 1987, Night); L.L. Thomas, PTN Outage Manager (12/07-14, 1987, Night): Jim Reed, Trainfng Department MOS'Instructor (12/12-14, 1987, Night).
While on shift these MOS observers reported any potentfal safety
- problems, questionable work practices, operating strengths, areas for improvements, and general recommendations.
During this period, Unit 3 was in Mode 5 and Unit 4 in Mode I. No items of immediate safety significance were noted.
The following questionable work practices were identified:
'I Placing paper over the freshly cleaned control room carpet created a potential fire and tripping hazard.
Other means to protect the cleaned carpet while ft drys are beIng explored.
A heater drain pump was tripped while performing maintenance on the heater drain tank level fnstrumentatfon.
The brakes failed on a parked forkliftcausfng it to'crash through an RCA gate.
The areas observed that need improvement are lfsted as follows:
Logging the completion of system walkdowns.
The Process Radfation Monitoring Operability Test Procedure unnecessarily cycles an air supply valve during a Decay Tank Gas Release.
An Blectrical Maintenance Procedure coricerning Battery Blectrolyte levels and the Turbine Operator's log do not provfde a minimum speciffcatfon for low level condition.
An administrative limit for these documents was recommended to ensure that the fnterim Technical Specfficatfon requirements are satisfied.
A stmflar problem was noted on November 29, 1987. Conective actfons are in progress.
Deviations from written procedure steps are allowed under strict administrative controls with PSN prior approval.
Barly fn the week, one bfOS observer questioned whether this policy was being followed correctly.
Further investfgatfon by all MOS observers concluded that devfatfons from procedures, when required, are being conducted properly, and that procedure usage in general fs very good. The requirement to obtain PSN approval prior to deviating from a procedure was reemphasized during shift briefings.
ATTACHMENT:
MOS DAILY REPORTS I
0 t
~
I gk y
MAN EMENT ON SHIFT OS)
WEEKLY
SUMMARY
REPORT WEEK STARTING:
PAGE 2
OF 7
1987 Maintenance supervisors need to provide better reports at the shift briefings.
The Shift Director must do a better job of keeping the control room informed.
Plastic placed around new insulation to keep it dry was found to be fullof water.
Ten separate procedures must be used to reduce load from 100% to Hot Standby.
Many are entered to perform only one or two steps.
Plant operation and support continues to improve as indicated by 30 occasions of observed "Strengths" by the MOS observers.
One particular situation concerning a leaking primary water valve demonstrated the professional attitude, attention to detail, diagnostic ability and teamwork of the Control Room crew.
ATTACHMENT'OS DAILY REPORTS
Ap 4, t T
~ 1 E
I
0-ADM-019
~ Management on Shift (M
)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Z)ate.
12/07/87 From:
6server)
Shift:
Qx Day Q Night A.
I'lant evolutions observed Attended morning meeting Attended pre-shift operations meeting Unit k'4 steady state operations, and Unit 3 in mode 5
Performed secondary side walk-down on both Units Discussed surveillance monitoring with OPS-gC Immediate safety problems None observed Questionable work practices None observed Actions taken None Strengths Observed good communications between the
- PSN, APSN, NNE and the rest of the shift operators starting with the pre-shift meeting and continuing throughout the day during 'routine normal operations.
Areas for improvement None G.
Recommendations None Completed By:
K.J. Miecek server Dat 12/07/87 Reviewed By:
perations Superintendent-Nuclear
+ipse'i f6 p(t/s7 Date l 12/07/87
0-ADM-019
~ Management on Shift (M
')
MOS DAILYREPORT Page To Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear 12/07-08-87, From:
William Detwiler (M
6seruer)
Shift:
p Day
~
gx Night A.
, Plant evolutions observed Meat up of Unit 3 RCS Tour of secondary side of Plant High containment pressure test, OP-4004.4 B.
Immediate safety problems None observed C.
Questionable work practices Paper is used to cover the control room floor for several hours to keep the carpet clean.
The paper is a fire hazard because it is untreated and a tripping hazard because it tends to bunch up.
D.
Actions taken Informed PSN of concern about paper on floor of control room.
12/07-08/87
0 II, I
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (M
)
MOS DAILYREPORT PIIge E.
Strengths The PSN used the "hot items" list well for maintenance items that need immediate attention.
The use of an Administrative Technician is a g'ood practice because it reduces the paperwork load of the
- PSN, APSNs and RCOs.
Missing page of a. procedure was discovered by an alert APSN while performing the procedure.
This demonstrated alertness and an assuming attitude.
G.
Areas for improvement The practice of working auxiliary operators and maintenance personnel 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> a day should be reviewed.
Personnel working these kind of hours can become overly tired and less alert.
This can make them more prone to mistakes.
For some personnel working 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> straight occurs fairly frequently (1-2 times a week).
There seems to be no guidelines that determines which procedures
're guidance only procedure and which are sign off procedures.
Guidelines should be established or if they exist. should be communicated to operations personnel.
A system walkdown procedure was performed but not placed in the walkdown book.
This led to'confusion and almost caused the PSN to redo the procedure.
More attention should be paid to this type of paperwork.
Recommendations None Completed By:
William Detwiler server Date.
12/08/87 Reviewed By:
AMBI:Il>III>N'I
. Op ations Superintendent-Nuclear g I>/~~'INALPAGE Date: l2 I' 12/07-08/87
0-ADM-019
~ Management on Shift (M
)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date.
12/07-08/87 From:
(M bserver)
Shift:
Q Day gx Night A.
B.
, I'lant egol ytlqnypbseqveg APSN turnover Beginning of shift meetings 4-0SP-041.1 RCS leak rate calculation OP-4004.4 containment isolation racks gR50 and 51 test Immediate safety'roblems E.
None observed Questionable work practices None observed Actions taken Hone Strengths Shift meetings are working very well Areas for improvement Hone observed Recommendations None Completed By:
server Date:
Reviewed By:
- MikiI Iarrnlre7 perations uperi ntendent-Nuclear
,<<~
'( '7 Dat'. P
/d'2/07-08/87
~.
0-ADM-019
~ Management on Shift (M
)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page To Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
12/08/87 From:
(M bseruer)
Shift:
Px Day Q Night A.
C.
E.
I'lant evolutions observed Morning meeting Preshift operators meeting Reviewed operators overtime log book Unit 4 steady state power; Unit 3 Mode 5 Plant tour - accessible portions of RAB and secondary Immediate safety problems None observed Questionable work practices None observed Actions taken None Strengths None noted Areas for improvement Attached is a follow-up on MOS report by William Detwiler dated 12/07-08/87.
G.
Recommendations None Completed By:
K.J. Wiecek seruer Date 12/08/87 Reviewed By:
0 erations Superintendent-Nuclear
$q'47
~(q[g ~ iz 1~[%
Date l3 12/08/87
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOS DA]1.YREPORT
)'SgL>>
Areas forimprovement Response to Attached HOS report of 12/07-08/87
- l. I reviewed the Operations Department overtime log book for the period of 11/30/87 thru 12/08/87.
There was only one instance where a non-licensed operator had to work a 16 hour1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> shift. There were a number of 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> shifts worked during this period also, which is normal during the start-up of a plant.
The overtime limitations established in AP-0103.2, section 8.3.1. were being followed during this period.
2.
When a step or section of a procedure requires a signature, a signature space willappear next to the step or section of the procedure.
Section 2.2 of all O.P's, G.O.P's, O.S.P's etc., establishes which sections of the procedure are retained as O.A. records.
As a rule, ifthere are sign-off's in a procedure, it is retained.
The remainder of the procedure does not have to be retained and therefore does not require sign-off's.
- 3. I agree with his recommendation.
K.J. Wiecek Attachment - A 12/07-08/87
, II 1C F
4'
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page E.
Strengths The PSN used the "hot items" list well for maintenance items that need itmediate attention.
The use of an Administrative Technician is a good practice because it reduces the paperwork load of the
- PSN, APSNs and RCOs.
Hissing page of a procedure was discovered by an alert APSN while performing the procedure.
This demonstrated alertness and an assuming attitude.
F.
Areas forimprovement The practice of working auxiliary operators and maintenance personnel 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> a day should be reviewed.
Personnel working these kind of hours can-become overly tired and less alert.
This can make them more prone to mistakes.
For some personnel working 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> straight occurs fairly frequently (1-2 times a week).
There seems to be no guidelines that determines which procedures are guidance only procedure and which are sign off procedures.
Guidelines should be established or if they exist. should be communicated to operations personnel.
A system walkdown procedure was performed but not placed in the walkdown book.
This led to confusion and almost caused the PSN to redo the procedure.
Hore attention should be paid to this type of paperwork.
Recommendations None K.J. Wiecek Attachment - B Completed By:
Mil1 iam Detwi1 er server Date..12/08/87
. Reviewed By:
I erati ns uperi nten nt-uclear FINALPAGE OIIlki.II'SuliwT 12/07-08/87
4
0-ADM-019
~ Management on Shift (M MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear 12/08-09!87 From:
(M 6server)
Shift:
p Day px Night A.
Plant evolutions observed Draining RHR header Release of gas decay tank Inducing Xenon oscillations to perform flux map Shift turnover B.
Immediate safety problems None observed C.
Questionable work practices While performing a release of a gas decay tank the CRO deliberately skipped a step in 3-OSP-67.51 which is required to be performed by OP-5523.1 "Releasing a Gas Decay Tank" without prior approval by the PSN.
He made a notation in the comments space explaining why he did'not perform this step.
This is a violation of 0-ADM-201 Upgrade of Operations Procedure Usage for two reasons:
- 1. CRO should not have skipped step
PSN advised CRO of mistake and asked the relieving PSN to advise his CROs not to make the mistake.
12/08-09/87
0-ADM-019
~ Management, on Shift (M
)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page E.
Strengths Communications were conducted well F.
Areas forimprovement Clarification of yesterday's (12/08/87) comments on procedure verification.
When non-safety related procedures were written some require a step-by-step verification and others required only a signature at the end of the procedure.
0-ADM-101 states that those procedures deemed appropriate by the Operations Supervisor are to be written with step.-by-step verification. There are no specific guidelines.
The inducing Xenon oscillations to produce various Incore Axial Offsets, OP-12304.8 does not specifically reference OP-12404.1 which is the procedure for performing a flux map. It simply states to "Begin a flux map".
G.
Recommendations Procedures that are signed off only on their back page are being microfilmed in their entirety.
This results in the exact same front pages of the same completed procedures being repeatedly microfilmed. My recommendation is to microfilm only the last page of these types of procedures.
Completed By:
William L. Detwiler 6server Date 12/09/87 Reviewed By:
- M05.'I I'wonHT Operations Superintendent-Nuclear
~<q~(f'7 FINALPAGE
~
qa u/~w)
Dat: /~ P 7
12/08-09/87
0-ADM-01S Management on Shift {M MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
12/08-09/87 From:
(M bseruer)
Shift:
p Day Qx Night A.
B.
I'lant evolutions observed End of shift meeting PSN/AFSN turnover 3-OSP-067.1 process radiation monitor test Preshift briefing OS-12304.8 inducing Xenon Oscillation to produce various incore axial offsets Immediate safety problems D.
None observed Questionable work practices None observed Actions taken E.
None Strengths None observed F.
Areas for improvement None G.
Recommendations None Completed By:
seruer Date:
12 09 87 Reviewed By:
e MIÃiI IeilIIie'I perations Superi ntendent-Nuclear
@4+
D,~. i2 'l 7
12/08-09/87
Nl l
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (M
)
MOS OAILYREPORT Page To'perations Superintendent
- Nuclear 12/09/87 From; Wiecek dseruer)
Shift:
Qx Day g Night A.
Plant evolutions observed Morning meeting Preshift meeting Plant tour of Unit 3 steam trestle, intake area and "A"and nBn Diesel Generator buildings.
'eak shift meeting 4
Unit 4 steady state power, Unit 3 in Mode 5 B.
Immediate safety problems None observed C.
Questionable work practices t
MOS Re ort Clarification The step described in MOS report of 12/08-09/87 (Detwiler) was step 7.3.17 of 3-OSP-067-1 which has the operator close and lock the air supply valve to RCV-014; The reason he did this (which was noted on 3-OSP-067.1 in accordance with Admin-201 step 5.25.i. and b) was to continue on with OF-5523.1 which has Foe~Re-o n
the air supply to RCU-014 on step 8.1.10.1 to initiate a gas release.
Actions taken A procedure change was initiated to allow the operator to nN/A" step 7.3.17 of 3-OSP-067-1, ifthe functional test on R-3-14 was performed as a prerequisite to a Gas Decay Tank release.
- Ilos:2 I'caine'I 12/09/87
ILnagement on Shift(MO+
MOS DA]1.YREPORT Page STRBNGTHS The control room entry door would not close and lock properly and a security guard was promptly posted at the door until repairs could be made.
Overall plant cleanliness is outstanding Si nificant Event While an Ih'zC Spec. was working on PRhf-19, an apparent ground occured opening a breaker which deenergized all process radiation monitors.
This caused a Containment/Control Room Isolation to occur.
g,d-This is reportable under AP-0103.12, an automatic activation of any engineer/
safety feature.
Although I did not witness the actual occurrence it appears that the operators carried out the correct actions and made the proper notifications.
Area(s) for improvement None observed 12/09/87
th) gli
0-ADM-019
'management on Shift (MO MOS DAILYREPORT Page Recommendations None Completed By:
K.J. Wiecek server Date; 12/09/87 Reviewed By:
0 erations Superintendent-Nuclear nl i0$1 FINALPAGE X/8-gp Date: /2 Ed I
] 2/09/87
~
~ ~
~
~ I
~ I I
I I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~ I
~
I:
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
II+
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MO MOS DAILYREPORT Page E.
Strengths PSN took quick and decisive action to correct low electrolyte battery level and referred to Technical Specifications to ensure he was within operable limits concerning the battery level in spite of some confusion on what is minimum level.
F.
Areas for improvement Electrolyte of n4An battery was found to be low. The electrical maintenance procedure O-SME-003.2 states that the acceptance criteria is above the top of the plates.
The interim Technical Specifications, on the other hand, states that action must be taken to restore the level ifnot greater than minimum level.
This is causing confusion as to what is the minimum level. Electrical Supervisor willbe informed so that the confusion in the procedure can be resolved.
Also the Turbine Operator logs do not give a minimum specification for when electrolyte level is too low. A specification should be made that is slightly above the minimum level line.
G.
Recommendations None Completed By:
William Detwiler server Date.
12/10/87 Reviewed By:
perations Superintendent-Nuclear Dat: i~ r~ F7 12 09-10 87
3+
~ '
0-ADM-019
~ Management on Shift (M(OI MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear a
12/09-10/87 From:
L.L. Thomas bseruer)
N Shift:
Q Day
.'x Night A.
Plant evolutions observed End of shift meeting lVatch turnover Preshift meeting Unit 3 Mode 5 Unit 4 steady state operations B.
Immediate safety problems None observed C.
Questionable work practices None observed Actions taken None 1M(lw II"'ol:e'e'2/09-10/87
.0
)~AC a
ft II I
4 ~
0-ADM-019
~ Management on Shift (M MOS DAILYREPORT Page E.
Strengths ASPN held good tailboard meeting with operator prior to setting the TCVZZ01 valve watch i.e. duties, responsibilities, communication requirements etc.
PSN required INC, Blectrical and Mechanical Maintenance Supervisors on shift to report their assignments for the shift.
F.
Areas for improvement O-SMB-003.2 125 VDC station-battery monthly maintenance procedure needs to be reviewed to ensure compliance with interim Technical Specifications.
G.
Recommendations See item F.
Completed By:
L.L. Thomas server Date42/10/87 Reviewed By:
, eMtxi:I Inuna7 Operations Superintendent-Nuclear pe V+
I"INALPAGE Date: /2- /~ 3 12/09-10/87
0-ADM-019
~ Management on Shift (M
)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page To Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date 12/10/87 From:
bserver)
Shift:
Qx Day Night A.
I'lant evolutions observed 4
Morning meeting Pre-shif t meeting Unit 4, steady state power; Unit 3, Mode 5 Plant tour of Water Plant, Switchgear and MCC Rooms.
Partial walk down of 0-ONOP-103 "Control Room Inaccessibility" Procedure.
Peak pre-shift meeting B.
Immediate safety problems None observed C.
Questionable work practices None observed Actions taken None IZ/10/87
I l,b*
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift(M MOS DAILYREPORT Page E.
Strengths I expressed a few concerns I had with the "Control Room Inaccessibilityn Procedure, 0-ONOP-103 to the APSN, and he explained that the new Remote Shutdown System has not been fully implemented and all improvements are not complete.
His knowledge of the procedure and system awareness were excellent.
F.
Areas for improvement None G.
Recommendations None Completed By:
K.J. Viecek server Date:
12/10/87 Revie'wed By:
ailOS:I lRh)I%7 perations uperintendent-uclear I
fI 87 9S FINALPAGE Date:
12/10/87
0-ADM-019
~ Management on Shift(M)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
12 10-11 87 From:
Detwiler (M
seruer)
Shift; Q
Day Qx Night A.
I'lant evolutions observed Operabililty test Source Range NIS Testing AuxiliaryTransformer Recircing a base for sampling B.
Immediate safety problems None observed C.
Questionable work practices None observed Actions taken None 12/10-11/87
0-ADM-019 0 Management on Shift (M
)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page E.
Strengths RCO when performing operability test of source range Nl's alertly called in PSN when step could not be performed, received PSN approval, noted it and then proceeded with remainder of procedure.
Careful attention to procedure was evident on these shifts.
F.
Areas for improvement It appears that sometimes when steps in procedures are not performed as written, the necessary PSN approval, as evidenced by PSN's initials and the date on the applicable notation, is not obtained.
Also, there appears to be some confusion as to what constitutes a procedure deviation and when it can be approved by a PSN without an OTSC.
This observation was determined by interviewing several people in operations and by reviewing recent procedures, for example, 3-OSP-072.2 MSIV N2 backup periodic test performed on 10/23/87.
G.
Recommendations On procedures that affect many other procedures such as the Upgrade Operations Procedure Usage, O-ADM-201, any changes char are made should be ~ex lained.
not just stated, in a training brief and in pre-shift meetings as soon as possible after changes have been made.
Completed By:
server Date:
Reviewed By:
perations Superintendent-Nuclear g il'7 FINALPAGE Date: i> (I a Mob.'
I'S 0 lrr17 12/10-1 I/87
0-ADM-019
~ Management on Shift (M4)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page To Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date:
12 10-11 87 From:
L.L. Thomas (M
server)
Shift:
g Day gx Night A.
B.
C.
D.
Plant evolutions observed 3-OSP-059.1 Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation Analog Channel Operational Test 3-OP-065.2 APW and MSIV Backup Nitrogen Gas Supply System End of shift meeting Pre-shift meeting Immediate safety problems None 'observed Questionable work practices None observed Actions taken E.
None Strengths RO showed excellent judgment when he ran into a step in procedure, 3-OSP-059.1 Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation Analog Channel Operational Test, to verify Annunciator noffn that could not be accomplished due to other source range out of specification.
He called PSN and got out procedure O-ADM-201, Upgrade Operations Procedure
- usage, and applied step 5.29 which addressed this exact condition.
F.
Areas for improvement None G.
Recommendations None Completed By:
7 L.L. Thomas Date.
12/11/87 Reviewed By:
1M' lanne7 perations Superintendent-Nuclear Qp @fit(9'(
Date: />>/
12/10-11/87
0-ADM-019 anagement on Shift(MO MOS DAILYREPORT Page To Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date:
12/11/87 From:
K Wiecek (M
bserver)
Shift:
Qx Day Q Night A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Plant evolutions observed Morning meeting Pre-shift meeting Plant tour of Auxiliary Building, Gas House and various secondary systems Control Room operations, Unit 4 steady state power; Unit 3 Mode 5 Immediate safety problems None observed Questionable work practices None observed Actions taken None observed Strengths Professional attitude exhibited by all shift operators observed.
F.
Areas forimprovement None Recommendations None Completed By:
K.J. Wiecek server Date:
12/11/87 Reviewed By:
aN(li.l Iaall+I perations Su erintendent-Nuclear P (f(8 12 11 87
r '%
0-ADM-019 (anagement on Shift(MO MOS DAILYREPORT Page To Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
12 1 l-l? 87 From:
LVillja t rlv ler (M
bserver)
Shift:
Q Day Qx Night A.
B.
Plant evolutions observed Power range Nl Analog Channel Operational Test, 4-OSP-059.4 Charging chemicals to pressurizer through auxiliary spray Secondary Plant Periodic Test - Lube Oil Pumps Auto Start Test, 4-OSP-200.3 Shift meetings Plant tour Immediate safety problems None C.
Questionable work practices None D.
E.
Actions taken Hone Strengths Operators were very careful and artentative to detail whenever performing orocedures.
F.
Areas forimprovement None G.
Recommendations 1 suggest that when performing proceflures in the field that the person performing the procedure could get verbal approval from the PSN if deviation in procedure is necessarv.
The PSN could then initial the notation after the'"procedure is ronpleted.
This willallow flexibilitvto perform procedures without making people come back to the Control Room to get written approval.
This could he incorporated into O-ADH-201.
Completed By:
',~illiam L. T)et~viler Date:
12/12/87 M
bserver Reviewed By:
a MOS. I 1Wll/b7 Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Qg l2/IN(s7 Dat- >> l4 7
1 2/1 1-1 2/fl7
'I ~
0 4
I t
- Arh k'*
0-ADM-019 management on Shift (MO MOS DAILYREPORT Page To Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date; 12/11-12/87 From:
I..L. Thomas bserver)
Shift:
Q Day Qx Night A.
B.
C.
Plant evolutions observed 4-OSP-059.4 Power Range Nuclear Instrumentation Analog Channel Operational Test (N-44 section) 4 3-OP-065.2 AFW and MSIV Back Nitrogen Gas Supply System 4-OSP-200.3 Secondary Plant Periodic Test - Lube Oil Auto Start Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None Actions taken E.
None Strengths Fffective Pre-shift meetings, Plant status and future plans well covered.
F.
Areas forimprovement 1.
Maintenance Department Supervisors need to report what they are working on at the pre-shift meetings.
When they do not the APSN needs to ask them.
2.
Shift director needs to keep PSN/APSN better informed of status through the shift.
Recommendations None Completed By:
bseruer Date.
Reviewed By:
k/
Operations S perintendent-Nuclear o5(aP<
7
- MOS. I 1Vol/le Date:
12.
12/11-12/87
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (M
)
MOS DAlLYREPORT Page To Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date:
12 87 From:
K.J. Wiecek (M
bserver)
Shift:
Qx Day Q Night A.
I'lant evolutions observed Morning meeting Pre-shift meeting Power reduction to 85a/0 on Unit 4 to repair LCV-1510A Securing 1A Heater Drain Pump Isolating and Tagging out of LCV-1510A INC work performed on LCV-1510A Stroke Test of MOV-1404 1B Heater Drain Pump Trip B.
Immediate safety problems None C.
Questionable work practices While maintenance was being performed on "B" Heater Drain Tank Level Column, the "B" Heater Drain Pump tripped.
D.
Actions taken The PSN instructed the mechanics to be more careful when working around sensitive equipment.
12/12/87
A c
~
lW, t'L 4'
'I t
~4
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOSQ
~
MOS DAILYREPORT Page E.
STRENGTHS Uncomplicated Unit 4 power reduction to 85% power to repair LC-1510A Extensive Tail Board meeting on method of ensuring plant stability during the time work was being performed on LCV-1510A, i.e., number of Heater Drain Pumps running, and loader on LCV-150A, Xenon Oscillation, etc.
Tali Board meeting payed off, because the plant conditions were such that, when B" Heater Drain Pump( tripped, it did not cause any plant perturbations.
Vhile Stroke Testing MOV-1404, the Upstream Isolation Valve $2119 apparently was leaking by and when MOV-1404 was opened "A" and "C" Auxiliary Peed Pumps started to rotate.
The operators noticed this immediately and took action by reclosing MOV-1404, stopping "A" and "C" Auxiliary Peed Pumps from rotating.
They also consulted the Procedures and contacted Upper Management to see if there were any concerns they may have overlooked.
There were none.
F.
AREAS FOR INPROVENENT None G.
RECONNENDATIONS Remind all Departments to be more careful working around sensitive equipment.
Completed By:
M 6server Date.
Reviewed By:
perations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
1> t4 7
- MOS.I I'CKIII87 I'g 0/(~(~
FINALPAGE 12/12/87
8'4.
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (M
)
MOS DAILYREPORT To:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
12/12-13/87 From William L. Detwiler (M
bseruer)
Shift:
P Day
-'x Night A.
I'lant evolutions observed Filling 4A Accumulator Increasing power from &5~(o to 100%
Man injured on Unit 2 Leakby of Dilution Valve Secured 4A main condensate pump B.
Immediate safety problems None C.
Questionable work practices FCV-114A apparently leaked by causing an inadvertent dilution of the RCS.
The cause is not known at this time, but improper seating of FCV-114A is suspected.
Actions taken The primary water pumps were secured and isolated.
All valves that could be a
source of dilution water to the RCS were checked tightly closed.
As no discrepancies were discovered, the primary water pumps were restarted and unisolated with no reoccurrence of leakby.
A PWO was submitted to investigate the problem.
The dilution flow path willbe closely monitored.
~ MltÃI I"Vl"SV 12/12-13/87
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (M
)
MOS DAILYREPORT Pttge E.
Strengths The RCO detected leakage past PCV-114A while performing a RCS Leak Rate Surveillance.
He immediately informed the PSN.
There was good team work response to the problem with good diagnostic ability demonstrated by the Operations Team.
Procedure was used as much as possible.
The detection and response to the problem demonstrated alertness, team work and good watch standing procedures.
F.
Areas for improvement None G.
Recommendations None Completed By:
William L. Detwiler server Date:
Reviewed By:
4 MOB. I I'helitt7 Operations uperi ntendent-Nuclear
~y It(ig(S" FINALPAGE Date:
i~ lS 12/12-13/87
0-ADM-019
~Management on Shift (M(
MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear D:~/
From:
J. Reed (M
server)
Shift:
Q Day
~
Ox Night A.
Plant evolutions observed Pre-shift brief Power escalation 85(yo to 100%
Shift turnover Turbine Control Valve Testing 3-OSP-089 Daily RCS Leak Rate Check Corrective actions for RCS in-leakage Air Evacuation of injured man from Fossil Unit B.
Im mediate safety problems None C.
Questionable work practices Following the identification of an RCS in-leakage of approximately 12 Gal/hr, it was tentatively determined that FCV-114A was leaking.
Actions taken PSN wrote PWO to confirm FCV-114A leaking and to repair 12/12-13/87
1'
~ ItM'
0-ADM-019
~Management on Shift (M(g MOS DAILYREPORT Page E.
Strengths The crew displayed excellent teamwork and diagnostic skills in locating the source of RCS in-leakage.
F.
Areas for improvement New insulation in the area above Unit 3 APW Nitrogen station is wrapped in poly to protect it from the weather.
The inside of the poly is full of liquid and all the insulation is saturated.
It appears that all the insulation needs to be replaced.
G.
Recommendations None Completed By:
J. Reed bserver Date:
12/13/87 Reviewed By:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Pg) <'4I'I)~
PINALPAGE Dte: ~>A /7 12 12-13 87
4 JP
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (M MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear 12/13/87 From:
(M bseroer)
Shift:
Qx Day Q Night A.
I'lant evolutions observed Load reduction to 100 MWE on Unit 4 to repair stuck closed N.E. intercept valve Repair of and subsequent testing of N.E. intercept valve 4-OSP-087 "Main Turbine Valves Operability Test" Holding power below 50'i'o while repairs were being made to a water box manway
, cover B.
Immediate safety problems None C.
Questionable work practices None observed D.
Actions taken None
- NIXi:I I'cnlIia7 12/13/87
c (fh II" 4
0-ADM-019 management on Shift (MO'Q MOS DAILYREPORT Page E.
Strengths None observed F.
Areas for improvement Operators have to use no less than ten different procedures to accomplish a normal load reduction from 100fo power to Hot Standby.
Most of the procedures require signatures, and are entered for only one or two signatures per procedure.
(Le.
stopping a Heater Drain Pump, or Main Feed Pump).
Recommendations Procedure process should be simplified where by the operator should only have to follow one procedure instead of jumping in and out of many procedures to perform a routine evolution such as a Load Reduction.
Completed By:
K.J. Viecek server Date:
12/13/87 Reviewed By:
1llOS:I IQ4libI perations uperi ntendent'-
uc ear gg ia((~(I7 FINALPAGE Date:
<8 /4 7 12/13/87
0-ADM-019
~ Management on Shift (M)
MOS DAILYREPORT To:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear 12/13-14/87 From:
William Detwiler (M
bseruer)
Shift:
p Day px Night A.
Plant evolutions observed 4
Increasing power from 50% to IOOVo on Unit 4 Failure of pressurizer water temperature indication - Unit 3 4
Drained n3CU Sl Accumulator Securing Turbine Plant Cooling Water Pump B.
Immediate safety problems None C.
Questionable work practices None Actions taken None 12/13-14/87
0-ADM-019
~ Management on Shift (MS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page E.
Strengths Good adherence to procedure when pressurizer water temperature failed.
PSN stopped the heat up because the procedural requirement for plotting pressurizer temperature could not be met.
The vapor space temperature was PWO'd at the time.
An alert RCO on Unit 3 realized that draining "C" accumulator without pressure in it could result in a vacuum being formed inside of the accumulator.
The RCO immediately informed the PSN.
The PSN directed the draining to be stopped and pressurized the accumulator with Nitrogen before proceeding.
This demonstrated alertness and sound thinking.
F.
Areas for improvement None G.
Recommendations None Completed By:
William Detwiler server Date:
12/14/87 Reviewed By:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear II/ ig(Iq(KI FINALPAGE aMOS.I I'C OI>a7 Date:
12/13-14/87
0-ADM-019 anagementon Shift(MO MOS DAILYREPORT Page To Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date'2/13-14/87 From:
(M bseruer)
Shift:
p Day gx Night A.
B.
Plapt evolutions observed Shift turnover [Pj Shift meetings (2)
Power escalation to 100aa Pressurizer heatup Corrective actions for forkliftaccident Immediate safety problems None C.
Questionable work practices Breaks failed on a parked forkliftcausing it to crash through an RCA gate.
D.
E.
Actions taken Both H.P. and Security responded well and appropriately.
PSN is taking follow up actions.
Strengths Power escalatioq was conducted in a very professional rianner.
F.
Areas forimprovement None Recommendations None Completed By:
J. Reed M
bseruer Date:
12/14/87 Reviewed By:
a MOS.I l1/Ol/le Operations Superintendent-Nuclear oy i~/i~I<~
Dat: i~ i 1 Z/13-1 4/87
nr S
II I.e 46+
Nanagement-on-Shf ft (N5)
ACRNYNS AEO AFM ANPO APSN ASP CCM CP CVCS D6 EP or DP ECCS ED6 ERT EM FCV FPL FSAR GENS 6PN HCV NSI HX IAN ICM ICMP IST LCV NCC IS I5IV:
IGS NN NAB NAMAS NCR NIS NO Auxf1fary Equi pwent Operator Auxilfary Fee>heter Assistant Nuclear Plant Operator Assistant Plant Supervisor Nuclear Adwtnfstratfve Plant Supervisor Procedure Component Cooling Mater Charging Puap Chemical Vol~ Control Systea Nesel 6enerator Nrect Current Nfferentfal Pressure Eeergence Core Cooling Systea Eeergency Nesel 6enerator Event Response Team East-Mest Rou Control Yalve Rorfda Pouer and Light Coapany Ffnal Safety Analysis Report 6eneratfng Equfpeent Nanageaent Systems 6allons Per Nnute Hand Control Valve High Head Safety In5ectfon Heat Exchanger In Accordance Mfth Intake Cooling Mater Intake Cooling Mater Pump Inservfce Testing Level Control Yalve Notor Control Center Notor 6enerator Nafn Steam Isolation Valve Nanageeent on Shfft Ifotor Operated Valve Nuclear Malnfstratfon Building National Marnfng System (Baergency Planning)
Non-Conforaance Report Nuclear Instnaentatfon Systea Nuclear Operator NOP/NOT NPO NPS NS NME 05 ONOP 005 OTSC PI PN PNSC PORV PPN PRZ PIP PMO gSPDS RCA RCO RCP RCS RTD RV SAS 5/6 SGFP SIS SNOM SNPO
Normal Operatf ng Pressure/Normal Operating Teaperatuvv.
Nuclear Plant Operator Nuclear Plant Supervisor Nuclear Regulatory Coaeafssfon North-South Nuclear Match Engfneer Overpressure Ntfgatfng System Off Normal Operating Procehne Out-of-Service On The Spot Change Polarlzatfon Index Preventatf ve Nafntenance Plant Nuclear Safety Coaaf ttee her Operated Relief Valve Parts Per Nfllfon Pressurizer Procedure Upgrade Prograa Plant Murk Order Qualified Safety Parameter Nsplay Systea Radiation Control Area Reactor Control Operator Reactor Coolant Pump Reactor Coolant System Residual Heat Reeovai Resf stance Teaperature Devfce Reactor Vessel Safety Assessaent Systea Steam 6enerator Steam 6enerator Feed Puep Safety In5ectfon Systea Short Notice Outage Mork Senior Nuclear Plant Operator Shift Technical Advisor Teaporary Operating Procedure Teaporary. Systea Alteration Tesporary Procedure Volte Control Tank Mestfnghouse Corporatf on