IR 05000566/1978009
| ML19269C106 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Yellow Creek  |
| Issue date: | 12/20/1978 |
| From: | Gouge M, Herdt A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19269C105 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-566-78-09, 50-566-78-9, 50-567-78-09, 50-567-78-9, NUDOCS 7901290013 | |
| Download: ML19269C106 (5) | |
Text
.
t ' 88G04 k
UNITED STATES
[p
. g o
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGloN ll y
j v, g
e-t 101 M ARlETT A sTR E ET, N.W.
ATLANT A, GEORGI A 30303 o,s,...../
Report No..
50-566/78-9 and 50-567/78-9 Docket No.: 50-566 and 50-567 License No.: CPPR-172 and CPPR-173 Category: A2 and A2 Licensee: Tennessee Valley Authority 830 Power Building Chattanooga, Tennessee 37401 Facility Name:
Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Inspection at:
Yellow Creek Site, Tishomingo County, Mississippi Inspection conducted: December 5-8, 1978 Inspector:
M. J. 4ouge L
[
7h Reviewed by:_
A. R. Herdt, Chief Date Projects Section Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch Inspection Summary Inspection on December 5-8, 1978 (Report No. 50-566/78-9 and 50-567778-9)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of construction status, stainless steel sump fabrication, QA audits, QA records, warehouse storage of construction materials, and site handling of IE bulletins and circulars. The inspection involved 25 inspector-hours on-site by one NRC inspector.
Results:
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
79012900t3
.
RII Report Nos. 50-566/78-9 and 50-567/78-9 I-1 DETAILS I Prepared by:
gaff
/
2apS
,
M. J. Gouge / Principal Inspector ate Projects Section l
Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch Dates of Inspect'
ecember 5-8, 1978 Reviewed by:
[/$
/d JC!7f A. R.~Herdt, Chiei at'e Projects Section Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch 1.
Persons Contacted a.
Licensee
- M.
M. Price, Project Manager W. E. Roper, Construction Superintendent
- C. G. Wages, Assistant Construction Engineer (QC)
- S. G. Carr, Assistant Construction Engineer (PE)
- R. D. Briggs, Supervisor, Mechanical QC Unit R. G. Delay, Supervisor, Civil and Materials QC Unit L. C. Marshall, Supervisor, Mechantcal Project Unit T. E. Brown, Supervisor, Wozehouse Services
- J. N. Holladay, Supervisor, Project QA Unit
- S. E. Alge, Supervisor, Document Control Unit K. K. Durrani, Project QA Unit J. M. Guillot, Project QA Unit J. R. Daniel, Materials QC Unit C. M. Freeman, Civil QC Unit R. J. Engel, Civil QC Unit K. Shivers, Boilermaker Foreman
- S. Watson, Document Control Unit L. Cofer, Boilermaker
- Denotes those present at the Exit Interview.
2.
Licensee Actions on Previous Inspection Findings This area was not inspected.
3.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompliance or deviations.
An unresolved item identified duri ig this inspection is discussed in paragraph.
.
RII Report Nos. 50-566/78-9 and 50-567/78-9 I-2 4.
Independent Inspection Effort a.
Construction Status (Units 1 and 2)
Yellow Creek Nuclear Site, Units 1 and 2 were issued a construc-tion permit on November 29, 1978.
Blasting operations are essentially complete for Units 1 and 2 Reactor Buildings.
Placement of foundation concrete for Unit 1 Reactor Building foundation is planned for the month of December 1978.
Shop fabrication of stainless steel sumps that are part of the Equipment and Floor Drainage System is in progress.
Concrete pours are being conducted on the steam vault sections of Units 1 and 2 turbine buildings.
Fabrication of warehouse, office, shop and storage buildings are continuing operations. The central-mix batch concrete plant has been calibrated.
b.
Stainless Steel Sump Fabrication (Unit 1)
The inspector observed fabrication of stainless steel sumps that will become part of the Equipment and Floor Drainage System. The sumps have een designated by TVA as Quality Level I on drawing 4RE0782-lR-1 R3.
The drawing issued to the boilermaker foreman supervising the fabrication was checked against the drawing index file and master drawing file to ensure it was the latest revision.
Identification heat numbers on the stainless steel sump plates at the fabrication shop were used to obtain the receiving inspection reports and certified material test reports (CMTR) for stainless steel plates with heat numbers 80840 and 80870 manufactured by Eastern Stainless Steel.
Chemical and physical properties were checked by the inspector against the criteria in the licensee's procedure RIS and PM C508R4.
Both heats of stain-less steel plates inspected had acceptable material documentation.
The qualification records of the boilermaker fabricating the stainless steel sumps were reviewed and found to be acceptable.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified within the above areas inspected.
Quality Assurance Audit Review (Units 1 and 2)
c.
The TVA Topical Report TR 75-01-A, Section 17.lA.18.3 titled
" Construction Audits" specifies that the Supervisor, Site QA Unit, is responsible to perform planned and periodic audits of all construction activities.
The audit results are to be documented and reviewed by management.
The following DEC QA audits were examined by the project inspector for completeness, deficieacies found, corrective action taken, and implementation
.
RII Report Nos. 50-566/78-9 and 50-567/78-9 I-3 in accordance with the licensee's procedures CEP 18.01 and QAP 18.01.
Audit Number Subject YC-G-78-06 Work Package Control YC-G-78-07 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment
~
The audits reviewed were found to be conducted and documented correctly.
Tennessee Valley Authority has committed the Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant to ANSI N45.2.12, Draft 4, Revision 2, as indi-cated in table 17.1A-4(T) of the Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant PSAR.
Section 4.4 of ANSI N45.2.12, Draft 4, Revision 2, states, in part, " audit reports shall be issued within thirty days after the audit" TVA Construction QAP 18.01 gives no time period for submittal of the audit report after the audit has been conducted. The audit reports reviewed by the inspec-tor had been prepared within the 30-day period specified in ANSI N45.2.12.
The discrepancy between ANSI N45.2.12, Draft 4, Revision 2, and TVA Construction QAP 18.01 with regard to the 30-day requirement in submittal of audit reports after audit completion is identified as unresolved item number 566-567/78-09-01.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified within the above area inspected.
d.
9A Record Review (Units 1 and 2)
(1) The master Quality Control Investigation Report (QCIR)
log maintained by the Document Control Unit was reviewed for content and accuracy in accordance with CEP 15.0;.
Completed (cleared) QCIR's up to and including QCIR 4875 were reviewed for acceptablc disposition and the local QCIR log maintained by the Mechanical QC Unit Supervisor was inspected.
The QCIR system was found to be implemented and functioning in accordance with CEP 15.01.
(2) The licensee is presently preparing a site procedure to control inspection status of individual items and components of the nuclear plant as required by Criterion XIV of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50.
The licensee has written a draft procedure which has been distributed for comment.
This item is identified as inspector follow-up item 566-567/78-09-0.
RII Report Nos. 50-566/78-9 and 50-567/78-9 I-4 No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified within the above areas inspected.
e.
Warehouse Storage of Construction Material (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector conducted a walk-through of all site storage areas designated as Level C or Level D to determine if safety-related items were being stored in proper areas and in accordance with the applicable Receiving Inspection, Storage and Preventive Maintenance (RIS-PM) Manual procedures. All safety-related items observed were stored in the designated areas in accordance with applicable RIS-PM Manual Procedures.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified within the above area inspected.
f.
Site Handling IE Bulletins and Circulars (Units 1 and 2),
The inspector reviewed the fiie of IE Bulletins and Circulars maintained by the Document Control Unit.
The file was up-to-date and had been reviewed by site management. The project manager and construction engineer review all received Bulletins and Circulars for applicability to the project and determine what corrective action, if any, is required.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified within the above areas inspected.
5.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives listed in paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on December 8, 1978.
The inspector summarized the scope of the inspection as follows: construc-tion status, review of stainless steel sump fabrication, QA audit review, QA record review, warehouse storage inspection, and site handling of IE bulletins and circulars. The Region 11 inspector identified one unresolved item: Audit Report Time Requirements 566-567/78-09-01, and one inspector follow-up item, Inspection Status Procedures 566-567/78-09-02.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.