IR 05000528/2002301

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRC Examination Report - 50-528/02-301; 50-529/02-301; 50-530/02-301
ML023450519
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 12/06/2002
From: Gody A
Operations Branch IV
To: Overbeck G
Arizona Public Service Co
References
50-528/02-301, 50-529/02-301, 50-530/02-301
Download: ML023450519 (9)


Text

December 6, 2002

SUBJECT:

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT - 50-528/02-301; 50-529/02-301; 50-530/02-301

Dear Mr. Overbeck:

On November 21, 2002, the NRC completed initial examinations at your Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which were discussed on November 21, 2002, with Messrs. Bill Ide, Michael Shea, and other members of your staff.

The examination included the evaluation of five applicants for senior operator limited to fuel handling licenses. We determined that all five of the applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and your response will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Anthony T. Gody, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Dockets: 50-528; 50-529; 50-530 Licenses: NPF-41; NPF-51; NPF-74

Enclosure:

NRC Examination Report 50-528, 529, 530/02-301

Arizona Public Service Company-2-

REGION IV==

Dockets:

50-528; 50-529; 50-530 Licenses:

NPF-41; NPF-51; NPF-74 Report No.:

50-528/02-301; 50-529/02-301; 50-530/02-301 Licensee:

Arizona Public Service Company Facility:

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Location:

5951 S. Wintersburg Road Tonopah, Arizona Dates:

November 18-21, 2002 Examiners:

T. F. Stetka, Senior Operations Engineer, Operations Branch G. E. Werner, Senior Operations Engineer, Operations Branch Approved By:

Anthony T. Gody, Chief Operations Branch

/ivision of Reactor Safety

-2-SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ER 50-528/02-301; 50-529/02-301; 50-530/02-301 on November 18-21, 2002; Arizona Public Service Company, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3; Initial Operator Licensing Examination.

NRC examiners evaluated the competency of five applicants for senior operator limited to fuel handling licenses at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station. The licensee developed the written and operating examination using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 8, Supplement 1. Licensee proctors administered the written examination to all applicants on November 18, 2002. The NRC administered the operating tests on November 19-21, 2002.

Cornerstone: Human Performance No findings of significance were identified (Section 40A4.1).

Report Details 4.

OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)

4OA4 Initial Operator License Examination

.1 Operator Knowledge and Performance a.

Examination Scope On November 18, 2002, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examination to all five applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on November 27, 2002.

The NRC examination team administered the operating examinations to the five applicants on November 19-21, 2002. Each senior operator limited to fuel handling license applicant participated in two scenarios, a refueling facilities walkthrough test consisting of five system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of one task or two questions in five areas.

b.

Findings All applicants passed the written examination and all parts of the operating examinations. The average written examination score for the applicants was 91.6 percent with the scores ranging from 86 to 96 percent.

The licensee conducted a performance analysis for the written examinations with emphasis on two questions missed by half or more of the applicants and submitted this analysis to the chief examiner for review. After reviewing the licensees analysis, the chief examiner concluded that all questions were valid and that there were no apparent training deficiencies. There were no post-examination comments on examination questions. The analysis identified no common knowledge deficiency. No remediation training was determined to be necessary following the examinations. The text of the examination questions and the performance analysis may be accessed in the ADAMS system as noted in the attachment to this report.

No findings of significance were identified.

.2 Initial Licensing Examination Development The licensee developed the written examination in accordance with NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1, using facility training and operations staff on the security agreement to prepare and validate the examination.

-2-

.2.1 Examination Outline and Examination Package a.

Examination Scope The facility licensee submitted the integrated examination outlines on July 22, 2002.

The chief examiner reviewed the submittal against the requirements of NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1, and provided comments to the licensee. The facility licensee submitted the final draft examination package on September 19, 2002. The chief examiner reviewed the draft submittal against the requirements of NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1, and provided comments to the licensee on the examination on October 2, 2002. The NRC conducted an onsite validation of the operating examinations and provided further comments during the week of October 28, 2002. The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution on November 7, 2002.

b.

Findings Region IV approved the initial examination outline and advised the licensee to proceed with the operating examination development.

The examiners determined that the written and operating examinations initially submitted by the licensee were within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.

No findings of significance were identified.

.3 Examination Security a.

Examination Scope The examiners reviewed examination security both during the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance with NUREG-1021 requirements.

Plans for refueling facility walkthrough security and applicant control were reviewed.

b.

Findings No findings of significance were identified.

.4OA5 Management Meeting Exit Meeting Summary The chief examiner presented the examination results to Messrs. Bill Ide, Vice President, Nuclear Production, and Michael Shea, Director, Nuclear Training, at the conclusion of the operating examination on November 21, 2002. The licensee acknowledged the findings presented.

The licensee did not identify as proprietary any information or materials utilized during the examination.

ATTACHMENT KEY POINTS OF CONTACT Licensee G. Box, License Initial Training Supervisor W. Potter, Simulator Support Section Leader P. Capehart, Senior Operator Limited to Fuel Handling Examination Author F. Riedel, Operations Training Department Leader ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED Accession No. ML023370238 - Written Examination for Senior Operators Limited to Fuel Handling Licenses Accession No. ML023370247 - Written Examination Performance Analysis Accession No. ML023370571 - Written Examination Comments for Clarification During the Examination