IR 05000498/1982006

IE Insp Repts 50-498/82-06 & 50-499/82-06 on 820412-16 & 22-23.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Qa Program Development & Implementation,Design Engineering, Procurement & Const

ML20054G318
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	05/27/1982
From:	Boardman J, Crossman W, Hill W, Hubacek W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20054G312	List: IR 05000498/1982006 ML20054G311
References
50-498-82-06, 50-498-82-6, 50-499-82-06, 50-499-82-6, NUDOCS 8206210428
Download: ML20054G318 (18)

Text

, _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - ..

-- -

. .

APPENDIX U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISION

REGION IV

Report: 50-498/82-06 50-499/82-06 Dockets: 50-498; 50-499 Licensee: Houston Lighting and Power Company P. O. Box 1700 Houston, Texas 77001 Facility Name: South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 Inspection AT: South Texas Project, Matagorda County, Texas Inspection Conducted: April 12-16 and April 21-23, 1982 Inspectors: [ e _-- _

I!Z 7 O 1 W. 'A. Crossman, Chief Date Reactor Project Section B (Par. 4)

_, -

-

7ff 'Z-W. M. Hill, Resident Reactor Inspector Date (Par. 6)

(h2 A- s%7/ez pf R. Boardman, Reactor Inspector Date' '

WPar. 5)

% = 5/z 7/n

'~

1-

. G. Hubacek, Consultant STP Dat6

[vW(Pars. 1, 2, 3, 4, & 7)

Approved: m W. A. Crossman, Chief

-- 5/27/8 "

Date l Reactor Project Section B 8206210428 820603 PDR ADOCK 05000498 a PnR

. _ - _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . - _ _

. .

Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted During The Period of April 12-16 and April 22-23, 1982 (Report 50-498/82-06; 50-499/82-06)

Areas Inspected: QA program development and implementation by the licensee, Bechtel, and Ebasco in the areas of design engineering, procurement, and construction. The inspection involved 168 inspector-hours by four NRC inspector Results: No violations or deviations were identifie . .

Details 1. Persons Contacted Principal Licensee Employees

• D. G. Barker, Project Manager

1. J. E. Geiger, Project QA Manager

• T. J. Jordan, Project QA Supervisor

• S. M. Dew, Engineering Manager

• J. L. Blau, Supervising Project Engineer

• B. Dodson, Project Procurement Manager

1. D. R. Keating, Project QA General Supervisor

1. I. P. Morrow, Construction Superintendent

1. J. W. Estella, Supervisor, Quality Systems

"J. W. Briskin, Manager, Support Services

• L. J. Klement, Supervising Engineer, Licensing

• J. N. Bailey, Supervising Project Engineer, Special Coordinator

• J. H. LeBlanc, Records Management R. M. McDaniel, QA Specialist M. E. Powell, Licensing Engineer R. R. Hernandez, Supervising Project Engineer Other Personnel

• B. L. Lex, Project Manager, Bechtel Power Corporation (Bechtel)

• R. L. Rogers, Project Engineering Manager, Bechtel

• J. L. Hurley, Project Engineer, Bechtel

• K. R. Dotterer, Project QA Engineer, Bechtel

1. A. W. Stenersen, Deputy Project QA Manager, Bechtel

• B. F. Robertson, Project Procurement Manager, Bechtel

1. J. R. Downs, Deputy Construction Manager, Bechtel D. Nichols, Project Field Engineer, Bechtel R. L. Carter, Assistant Project Field Engineer, Bechtel L. G. Hersh, Project Engineer, Bechtel D. L. Hauglum, Supplier Quality, Bechtel

1. C. L. Hawn, Quality Program Site Manager, Ebasco Services, Incorporated (Ebasco)

1. J. A. Thompson, Site Manager, Ebasco l R. Cummings, QA Site Supervisor, Ebasco R. Grippardi, QC Site Supervisor, Ebasco l R. M. Bedford, Senior Resident Engineer, Ebasco l A. W. Smith, Project QA Manager, Brown & Root, Inc. (B&R)

D. J. Harris, Assistant Project QA Manager, B&R l

i * Denotes those persons attending the exit meeting on April 16, 1982.

!

l # Denotes those persons attending the exit meeting on April 23, 1982.

. .

2. QA Program Review The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's, Bechtel's, and Ebasco's QA Programs against commitments contained in the Quality Assurance Program Description (QAPD), Revision 3, for the construction phase of South Texas Project (STP) submitted to the NRC by Houston Lighting and Power Company (HL&P) letter ST-HL-AE-802, dated March 9,1982. Results of the review are as follows: Houston Lighting and Power Company QA Program Houston Lighting and Power Company's quality assurance program for design, procurement, and construction for the South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2, is described in the STP Project Quality Assurance Plan (PQAP). The PQAP provides an interface between the policies and requirements delineated in the HL&P Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual (NQAPM) with detailed STP procedures developed by HL&P depart-ments or divisions having responsibility for quality related activities, as well as those performed by contractors for the STP. The require-ments set forth in the PQAP apply to all safety-related structures, systems, and components, as well as other selected plant structures, systems, and components. These items are delineated in tables 3.2.A-1 and 3.2.B-1 of the STP FSA Table 2.1 of the PQAP is a matrix of HL&P procedures utilized for STP which relates the procedures to specific 10 CFR 50 Appendix B criteri Table 2.2 of the PQAP delineates ANSI Standard and Regulatory Guide

compliance for ST HL&P, as the licensee and project manager for itself and the other i owners, has the overall responsibility for design engineering, procurement, construction, and quality assurance activities.

,

'

Bechtel Power Corporation (Bechtel), as the architect / engineer and

,

construction manager, provides HL&P with design engineering, procure-

'

ment, construction management, and quality assurance services.

'

Westinghouse Electric Corporation, as the nuclear steam supply system (NSSS) supplier, provides HL&P with NSSS design engineering, procure-

{ ment, fabrication, and quality assuranc Ebasco Services, Incor-l porated (Ebasco), will provide HL&P with construction, quality assurance, and quality control services under the direction of the construction manage Bechtel QA Program The Bechtel quality program for design engineering, procurement, and construction management for STP is contained in their project quality program manual (PQPM). The PQPM identifies the functions and respon-sibilities of the Bechtel organizations involved with the STP quality progra The PQPM does not provide detailed procedures for quality activitie Detailed requirements related to quality program activities

!

are contained in engineering departmeni, procedures (EDP's); quality assurance department procedures (QADP's); procurement supplier quality manual (PSQM); field quality control manuals; and project procedures. The STP quality program incorporates division quality program procedures modified to meet the scope of the project and licensee requirements. The procedures are supplemented, as necessary, by specific work instruction Ebasco QA Program The Ebasco Quality Assurance Program for STP is described in Ebasco Topical Report ETR-1001, Revision 10a, Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual, as modified by addenda to address specific STP requirements. Detailed requirements related to quality program activities are contained in quality assurance, quality control, and construction procedures which are being developed by Ebasco QA and constructio No violations or deviations were identified during the QA program review.

3. Organization Houston Lighting and Power Company The HL&P organization for STP consists of two independently administered functions reporting to the Executive Vice President, Nuclear Group:

quality assurance, under the direction of the Manager, Quality Assurance (position presently vacant); and engineering, fabrication, procurement, and construction under the direction of the Vice President, Nuclear Engineering and Constructio The Manager, STP, who reports to the Vice Presid(nt, Nuclear Engineer-ing and Construction, is responsible for engineering, construction, and procurement. The Manager, Support Services; Manager, Engineering; Project Controls Manager; Supervising Engineer, Licensing; and the Project Site Manager report to the Manager, STP. The Project QA Manager reports to the Executive Vice President, Nuclear Group pending assignment of an individual to the position of Manager, Quality Assuranc Bechtel Project Organization The Bechtel Vice President and Program Manager reports to the Vice Presider; and Manager of Houston Operations and has responsibility for overall management of engineering, procurement, and construction for STP. The Project Manager report: to the Vice President and Program Manager and is leader of the Bechtel project team which includes the Assistant Project Manager, Engineering and Procurement; Assistant Project Manager, Project Control; Project Strategic Planning Manager; Project licensing Manager; Project Startup and Test Manager; Project Manager of Construction; Project Quality Assurance Manager;

. .

and representatives from other Bechtel groups, as required. The Bechtel Project QA Manager reports to the Los Angeles Division QA Manager for Domestic Product Ebasco Project Organization The Ebasco site organization is headed by the construction manager who reports to the Vice President of Construction of the Ebasco New York office. Reporting to the Construction Manager is the Site Manager who provides direction to the Administration Manager and the Project Superintendent. The Project Superintendent provides direction to the Area Superintendent, the Construction Superintendent, and the Senior Resident Engineer. The Administration Manager provides direction to the Material Administrator and the Purchasing Administrato The Quality Program Site Manager reports offsite to the Chief Quality Assurance Engineer in the Ebasco New York offic The NRC inspector observed that the above organizations were consistent with the STP QAP . Design Engineering General HL&P has responsibility for design engineering of STP and in the quality assurance program description (QAPD), imposes the require-ments of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B Criterion III, Regulatory Guide 1.64 and ANSI 45.2.11 on the prime contractors and subcontractors. As architect / engineer, Bechtel has responsibility for engineering, design, and design verification. Bechtel will perform engineering design work in accordance with engineering department procedures, standards, design guides, and instructions, as implemented, for ST HL&P Engineering performs reviews of selected elements of the completed design to assure that contractual requirements are met. The interface between HL&P and Bechtel Engineering is through the HL&P Manager, Engineering, and the Bechtel Project Engineering Manager. As NSSS supplier, Westinghouse is responsible for engineering, design, and design verification for the NSSS. Ebasco, as constructor, will implement the design issued by Bechtel. All major design will be done by Bechte Any required site design activites will either be performed by Bechtel Engineering or under the control of Bechtel Engineerin HL&P Project Engineering The Manager, Engineering is the primary HL&P technical representative of the STP management organization and performs his function through the project engineering organization. HL&P Project Engineering consists of four main sections: Components Engineering, Systems Engineering, Site Engineering, and Engineering Administratio Components Engineering consists of the engineering disciplines that

. .

are necessary to perform the owner's review of engineering and design of_the NSSS and balance of plant (BOP) in the areas of engineered components and physical design. Systems Engineering consists of the engineering disciplines that are necessary to perform the owner's review of the NSSS and BOP in the area of engineered systems,~ fluid and electrical. Site Engineering's primary function is to coordinate engineering activities at the STP-site with Components and Systems Engineering to assure that design related problems are resolve Engineering Administration consists of clerical personnel whose primary function is to perform adminstrative support in the areas of filing and control of records and correspondenc The HL&P Project Engineering team presently consists of 49 personnel, 8 of whom are at the STP sit HL&P Project Quality Assurance performs audits of.HL&P and Bechtel to assure that design control requirements, specifications, and docu-ments are in accordance with design control criteri The NRC inspectors reviewed HL&P Project Engineering Procedures (PEP's) to ascertain whether design control requirements contained in the STP QAPD and the PQAP were adequately translated into the PEP' The following procedures were reviewed:

PEP-1.01, Manual Provisions, Revision 0 f PEP-1.02, Preparation and Control of Project Engineering Procedures PEP-1.03, Protection of Safeguards Information, Revision 0 PEP-1.04, Engineering Action Item List, Revision 0 J

i PEP-1.05, Personnel Training, Revision 0 PEP-1.06, Transmittal of Review Comments to External Organizations

I PEP-1.07, Preparation of Purchase Authorization, Revision 0 l

l PEP-2.01, Project Engineering Organization and Responsibilities, Revision 2 i PEP-2.02, Engineering Approval Authority, Revision 0 PEP-3.01, Performance of Owner's Reviews, Revision 0 PEP-3.02, Design Change Requests, Revision 0 PEP-4.01, Reporting Design and Construction Deficiencies to NRC, Revision 2 I

l l

!

.

.

PEP-5.01, Engineering Activity for the Procurement of Items and Services, Revision 0 PEP-5.02, Preparation and Control of Specifications, Revision 0 PEP-5.03, Processing Supplier Deviation Requests, Revision 0 c. Bechtel Design and Engineering Engineering and design activities within Bechtel are the responsi-bilities of the Engineering Department. The Engineering Department is under the direction of the Division Manager of Engineering; for facilities under construction, a project management team led by a Project Manager is forme The project management team includes a project engineering team which is led by a Project Engineer and is responsible for the design of STP. The Bechtel engineering staff is estimated to peak at approximately 500 professional The quality assurance program for control of engineering design is addressed in Section 3 (17.1.3), " Design Control," of Bechtel Topical Report BQ-TOP-1, Rev. 3A, October 1980, "Bechtel Quality Assurance Program for Nuclear Power Plants." Modifications and additions to the Bechtel Topical Report are contained in the Quality Assurance Program Description (QAPD), Part B, Rev. 3, March 9, 1982. The formal program commits to Regulatory Guide 1.64, Rev. 2, June 1976 which endorses ANSI 45.2.11-1974, "QA Requirements for the Design of Nuclear Power Plants."

Commitments contained in the program description are translated into Engineering Department Procedures (EDP) and Project Engineering Directives (PED) for implementation. To address the unique features of STP as a result of the transition activities from B&R to Bechtel, EDP's were modifie The NRC inspectors reviewed the following EDP's to determine the adequacy of the translation of requirements:

EDP 2.7, Engineering Department, Rev. O, February 3, 1975 EDP 2.13, Project Engineering Team Organization and Responsibilities, Rev. 2, January 20, 1976 EDP 4.60, Processing Corrective Action Requests (CAR), Rev. 3, September 18, 1981 EDP 4.61, Nonconformance Reports (NCR), Rev. O, February 20, 1974 EDP 4.62, Field Change Request (FCR), Rev. 2, May 27, 1976 EDP 4.65, Design Deficiency Processing, Rev. 2, February 6,1981

. .

Project Engineering Directives are issued to support the various disciplines in their engineering activities. To date, seven have been issued and were reviewed by the NRC inspector STP Discipline Work Package Review Procedure, Civil / Structural Rev. O, March 2, 1982 STP Discipline Checklist, Electrical, Rev. O, February 9,1982 STP Discipline Checklist, Architectural, Rev. O, March 4,1982 STP Mechanical / Nuclear Review Plan, System Work Packages, Rev. O, February 3, 1982 STP Control Systems Review Plan, System Work Packages, Rev. O, March 10, 1982 STP Plant Design - Pipe Stress and Supports Group, Review Plan for Work Packages, Rev. O, March 23, 1982 STP Discipline Checklist, Plant Design Layout, Rev. O, March 23, 1982 Site engineering activities are the responsibility of the project field engineering organizatio Activities for the site are conducted in accordance with Work Plan Procedures / Quality Control Instructions (WPP/QCI). The NRC inspectors reviewed the following:

WPP-3.0, Field Control of Design Documents, Rev. 1 WPP/QCI-5.3, Review and Processing of Nonconformance Reports for Deficiency Evaluation Reporting, Rev. 1, April 2, 1982 WPP-20, Field Change Request, Rev. O, April 21, 1982 No violations or deviations were identified during review of the design engineering QA progra . Procurement, Supplier Control, and Material Identification and Control for the Construction Phase The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's " Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual, Rev. 1, effective February 15, 1982, and applicable Bechtel procedures for compliance with regulatory requirements and licensee commitments. The NRC inspector also reviewed the licensee's transi-tion phase programs for verification of procurement. The NRC inspector reviewed the following:

_ _ _ _ _ .

- . __

- _________ - ____ -__

..

. .

.

(1) Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual The following sections were reviewed, as applicable, for procure-ment, supplier control, and material identification and contro Section Title QA Organization QA Program Procurement Document Control Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings Document Control Control of Purchase Material, Equipment, and Services Identification and Control of Materials, Parts, and Components Control of Special Processes 1 Inspection 1 Test Control 1 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment 1 Handling, Storage, and Shipping 1 Nonconforming Materials, Parts, or Components 1 Corrective Action 1 Quality Assurance Records 1 Audits (2) Procurement and Material Control Procedures All procedures relating to procurement have not been issue The NRC inspector reviewed the following procedures for compli-ance with 10 CFR, Part 50, Appendix B, and the STP QAPD relative to procurement and material contro (a) Bechtel Procedures Reviewed Definitions: WPP - Work Plan Procedures QCI - Quality Control Instruction EDP - Engineering Department Procedure 1) Bechtel Procurement Supplier Quality Manual, Sixth Edition, Rev. 0 2) EDP 4.28, Rev. 3, dated June 27, 1975, " Project Q List" 3) EDP 4.55, Rev. 3, dated January 27, 1976, " Project Material Requisitions"

.

4) EDP 4.58, Rev. 2, dated September 19, 1975, "Specifying and heviewing Supplier Engineering and Quality Verifi-cation Documentation" 5) EDP 4.63, Rev. 3, dated March 27, 1980, " Supplier Deviation Disposition Request" 6) EDP 4.61, Rev. O, dated February 20, 1974,and Rev. 1 LAPD (pacc- 3 only), dated January 3,1978, "Nonconform-ance Report" 7) EDP 4.60, Rev. 3 LAPD, dated September 18, 1981,

" Processing Corrective Action Requests (CAR's)"

8) EDP 4.64, Rev. 1 LAPD, dated August 18, 1981, " Review of Supplier Audit, Survey and Inspection Reports" 9) EDP 5.16, Rev. 6 LAPD, dated May 14, 1979, " Supplier Document Control" 10) EDP 5.31, Rev. O LAPD, dated February 21, 1975,

" Project Record Retention Processing" 11) CDP 5.32, Rev. 4, dated May 27, 1976, " Nuclear Project Records Office" 12) EDP 6.10, Rev. 1, dated May 20, 1975, " Supplier Quality Assurance Selection and Evaluation" 13) EDP 3.7, Rev. 0 (TPD), dated February 3,1975, " Project Material Assignment Schedule" 14) QCI 2.4, Rev. 1, dated March 21, 1982, "QC Inspection Instructions" 15) WPP/QCI 4.0, Rev. 1, dated March 21, 1982, " Receiving Inspection" 16) WPP/QCI 5.0, Rev. 1, dated March 18, 1982, "Nonconform-ing Materials, Parts, and Components" 17) WPP/QCI 5.1, Rev. O, dated March 18, 1982, " Processing of Nonconformance Reports Relating to Westinghouse Electric Corporation NSSS Equipment" 18) WPP/QCI 5.2, Rev. O, dated March 18, 1982, " Supplier /

Contractor Corrective Action"

_

-_ _ _ ___ __ _ __-_ - __ _ - _-___-___ -_____ _ ____ _ -

.

l l

19) WPP/QCI 5.3, Rev. 1, dated April 2, 1982, " Review and Processing of Nonconformance Reports for Deficiency Evaluation Reporting" 20) QCI 6.0, Rev. O, dated February 15, 1982, " Control of Quality Records" 21) QCI 8.0, Rev. O, dated February 15, 1982, "Qualifica-tion, Certification, and Training of Quality Control Personnel" 22) QCI 10.0, Rev. O, dated February 15, 1982, and PCN No. 1, dated March 21, 1982, " Field Material Requisi-tion Preparation and Approval" 23) WPP/QCI 12.0, Rev. 1, dated March 21, 1982, " Storage Control of Permanent Plant Items" 24) WPP/QCI 1E.2, Rev. O, dated February 15, 1982, " Control of Permanent Plant Spare Parts, Special Tools, and Keys" 25) WPP/QCI 28.0, Rev. 1, dated March 21, 1982, "Mainten-ance of Material and Equipment" 26) QCI 28.1, Rev. O, dated March 10, 1982, "QC Inspector Instructions for Maintenance / Surveillance" It was observed that that Bechtel Work Plan Procedure 12.0, Rev. 1, dated March 21, 1982, " Storage Control of Permanent Plant Items," did not contain reference to shelf life control of those items such as coatings, elastomeric products and lubrica.its which can have shelf life require-ment No violations or deviations were identifie . Construction QA Program Requirements The NRC inspector reviewed quality assurance manuals and procedures which had been developed by the licensee, construction manager, and the constructo This review was to examine quality assurance requirements as they related to construction activities. The follow-ing manuals were reviewed:

.

.

__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

. .

(1) Houston Lighting & Power Company a) Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual (NQAPM), Rev.1, February 15, 1982 b) Project Quality Assurance Plan (PQAP), February 15, 1982 (2) Bechtel Power Corporation a) Project Quality Program Manual (PQPM)

Ebasco's Quality Assurance Manual was specifically included as Part C to HL&P Qcality Assurance Program Description, dated March 9, 198 HL&P's and 3echtel's Quality Assurance Program Descriptions were also included as Parts A and B, respectively. The program descriptions listed 18 sections which correspond to the 18 criteria listed in 10 CFR 50 Appendix The licensee committed to the following ANSI Standards and Regulatory Guides with exceptions as noted:

Standard Title ANSI N.45.2-1971 Quality Assurance Program Require-RG 1.28 (Rev. O, 6/72) ments for Nuclear Facilities ANSI N.45.2.1-1973 Cleaning of Fluid Systems and RG 1.37 (Rev. O, 3/73)* Associated Components During Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.2-1972 Package, Shipping, Receiving, RG 1.38 (Rev. O, 3/73)* Storage and Handling of Items for Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.3-1973 Housekeeping During the Construc-RG 1.39 (Rev. O, 3/73)* tion Phase of Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.4-1972 Installation, Inspection, and test-RG 1.30 (Rev. O, 8/72)* ing Requirements for Instrumenta-tion and Electric Equipment During the Construction of Nuclear Power Generating Stations

. .

ANSI N.45.2.5-1974 Supplementary Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Structural Concrete and Structural Steel During the Con-struction PF:se of Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.6-1973 Qualifications of Inspection, RG 1.58 (Rev. O, 8/73) Examination, and Testing Plus Positions C.5, C.6, Personnel for the Construction C.7, C.8, and C.10 of Phase of Nuclear Power Plant:

Rev. 1 ANSI N.45.2.8-1975 Supplementary Quality Assurance RG 1.116 (6/76) Requirements for Installation, Inspection and Testing of Mechanical Equipment and Systems for the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.9-1974 Requirements for Collection, Storage RG 1.88 (Rev. 2, 10/76)* and Maintenance of Quality Assurance Records for Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.10-1973 Quality Assurance Terms and RG 1.74 (Rev. O, 2/74) Definitions ANSI N.45.2.11-1974 Quality Assurance Requirements for RG 1.64 (Rev. 2, 6/76)* the Design of Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.12-1977 Requirements for Auditing of RG 1.144 (Rev. 1, 9/80) Quality Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.13-1976 Quality Assurance Requirements for RG 1.123 (10/76)* Control of Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.23-1978 Qualification of Quality Assurance RG 1.146 (Rev. O, 8/80) Program Audit Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants l *The exceptions were noted and approved in the program description.

l l The NRC inspector confirmed that the quality assurance manuals

'

incorporated the basic provisions of each criteria into requirements of the QA program.

i . .

b. Implementing Procedures The NRC inspector reviewed the following Ebasco construction quality assurance, and quality control procedures:

QAS-1 Planning of Site QA Engineering Activities QAS-2 General Audit Procedure QAS-3 Processing of QA Engineering Audit Reports QAS-6 Material and Component Storage Audit QAS-8 Calibration and Gage Control Audit QAS-9 Document Control Audit QAS-23 QA Instructions CMI-1 Caring and Maintenance of Permanent Plant Items ASP-1 Site Procedures AdP-2 Organization and Responsibility ASP-6 Document Control ASP-16 Corrective Actions ASP-32 Maintenance of Cons +.ruction Equipment ASP-33 Nonconformances ASP-34 Indoctrination and Training CSP-12 General Instructions for Housekeeping During Construction CSP-25 Site Tagging Procedure CSP-32 Insulation Resistance Testing Electrical Equipment CSP-34 Control and Calibration of Survey Equipment QCP- Quality Control Organiation and Responsibilities QCP- Indoctrination, Training, and Qualification of Quality Control Personnel QCP- Preparation, Review, and Approval of Quality Control Procedures

. .

QCP- Document Control QCP-12.1 Calibration and Control of Measuring and Test Equipment QCP-13.1 Storage and Maintenance Inspection / Verification QCP-13.3 Housekeeping Inspection QCP-15.1 Identification and Control of Discrepancies and Nonconforming Conditions QCP-16.1 Corrective Action The procedures were reviewed to confirm that the purpose was clearly defined and the scope was adequate to cover that aspect of the QA progra These procedures were written and approved by Ebasco and subsequently reviewed and approved by Bechtel. The NRC inspector determined that many of these procedures were either being written or were in routing to cognizant personnel for approval. Other procedures, specifically discipline-related, were needed but, had not been writte Through discussions with site personnel, the NRC inspector determined that detailed specifications were needed before the procedures could be written, and these specifications were being developed and approve The NRC inspector also reviewed additional manuals containing proce-dures relating to construction and quality assurance as follows:

HL&P - Project Specific Quality Assurance Procedures (PSQP)

Bechtel - Project Quality Program Manual (PQPM)

Bechtel was in the process of developing work plan procedures and quality control instructions (WPP/QCI) for site activities to imple-ment the requiremeits in the PQPM. QA records were being maintained in the site QA records vault by HL&P in accordance with the records management system and existing instructions, however, new instruc-tions were being develope These procedures and instructions will be reviewed in subsequent inspections following approval and implementatio The NRC inspector had no further questions with regard to construction QA manuals or procedure . Exit Interview The NRC inspectors met with licensee representatives denoted in paragraph 1 to discuss the purpose and the scope of the inspection and the finding . .

The licensee was informed that this inspection was the first'of a series of inspections of the licensee's and principal contractors' QA for design, procurement and construction, and that future inspections will be scheduled to coincide with further development and implementation of QA program procedure .

2 t .

!

l l

• 1 lR.C.F, Oa M 786 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSICN PRiNC: PAL 6NSPECTOR(Name ast. Am andNemnan i

' "c "*

INSPECTOR.S REPORT N/L L Lv/:L M &f A REVIEWER Office of Inspection and Enforcement CRCCAfM W//uAN A WSPECTOIS l

7 R. boa ROMAA/ '

i W. Cv . M/>RAC 5W '

7 $ PE m f NEM WSPEC. D AM LICENSE E/VE NDOR DOCKET NO La seitas OR LICENSE pg NO. ter PROOuCTu13 agm y N Sect M '

&)**7~en A/ L./CH'T7M CM97 CD $ T M - MooiFv o 9o o jo 9 9 Sy Tr Po 6 a 0 - DELETE l C R - REPLACE l 0 F'EMOD OF INVESTIGATION nNSPECTION wwwvus=wwwww r .a a is

!NSPECTION PERFORMED SV ORGANIZATCN COCE OF REGION /MQ CONOUC FEOu 70 )qf 1 - REGCNAL OFFICE STAFF lCTHER tNG ACTIVITY (See IEMC 09.30 Manoower Recort-9 % g u, ,o g .. w ,y MO DAY l V MO DAY vm 2 RESICENTINSFECTOn aEGCN WSON saANCH hl9 / %lMQ Clk Md PERFORMANCE APPR AsSAL TEAM i C l[

> 25 = x . .

,.. m.mm::nn n .. 11 , u l 35 REGIONAL ACTION TYPE OF ACTIVITY CONCUCTED(Check one com on.vs

""* *

I Y 02 - SAFETY 08 - MGMT.VISif 10 RLANT SE INQUIRY l 1 - NRC FORM 591 33 - INCIDENT 07 - SPEC:AL 11 - INVENT. VE is - INVESTIGATION 2. REGONALOFFICE LETTER 04 - ENFORCEMENT 08 - VENOOR 12 - SHIPMENT / EXPORT

{ _

l 06 - MGMT. AU0if 08 - M AT. ACC iM PO R T l 3r n Mg-'Qm".MwA N< r , ; 3ycy

.N sPEU.UN .sv e sT.64 7.GN i NaNG5 TOT AL NLM8ER

• * " " * * " ENFORCEMENT CCNFERENCE REPORT CCN T A4N 2.790 LETTER Op eEp04T TR ANSMITTAL DATE CF VCLAriCNS ANO wtLO WFOR M A TCN

} 8 C D CEviATcNS spC FCR,4 591 aERORTSENT y ,, ,

^ OR R E'i T3 MO. FOR 2 - VOLAT,0N LETTER IS SUED ACTION l

3 - DEV1ATON A l9lC 0 Al8lCl0 Al8 C D MO. l O A V l VR VO.lCAV lVR 4 - VOLATION & OEviArcN , g , j, , l j j t vtS l 1 - VES 6dd'27$./l 3 l l l l l . w- .

. .c . . ., d ;.r*r.o. 9 . y pg .arpM ~ . 4.pu c. , AA is So $$

l uOcutt INFORM A TION vooutE WFeauAr'oN b uooutE NuvaER WSP gg 9 4000LE REO. FOLLOWUP $ M00ULE NLM8ER WSP g WODULE REO. FOLLCWUP r R$,$3 3e r 2 gg$i55 52 5

, .= g= , at 3_ g= = = g= - a-=w- ;;- o

g

5 5

! ! 55 i!

k $! s H f bbf l!Gaa r32

3

I s5 k $!

I3 i

: 3

c s5 k $

fS $ E

* f 53 a Ifv - * C

!'" $

f=

$

'

li ; %0l)i03lF ^ i i/ i i i Iiil$ i i liil ^

i i i i i IiiI

• li,I i ,/ , , i

• , i i i , I,,I c

r i i r i lii! c i i . i i i iiil I , , , , l , I,ii  :- , i l,, , !! , I h!A ?ido/d b 'li?2 i , i liiIe i i lii! ^

i i i i i liiI a

,M , , I , li,1 - , , , i i I,,1

,

cl ii i i i li,l C i , , , i liiI l I 4 , , , . I I,,1 =

, , , , , I,,1 h i liilH , , , , I l l , I , ,1 s il i l,il -

, , , , I i l,,I

'

, , , , Ill i liil a i i .it I i Iiil c

, , , i !!l,Ii,I C i i l,,I i Ii,I o! ! . , , , Ill  !,,1 _

, , l . .

,'l ;

,i,,i . .

! ! !  ! , I !  ! ! , ! i i i  ! ! , ,  ! ! I

'

4 , , , , ! , 1,,1 4 , , 1 1 , , li,i  !

i t , !  ! ! i i ! f f i l i hamE SECcE E F a i i i i , , . , , __