IR 05000461/1990010
| ML20044A888 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 07/06/1990 |
| From: | Christoffer G, Creed J, Madeda T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20044A887 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-461-90-10, NUDOCS 9007160264 | |
| Download: ML20044A888 (2) | |
Text
.--_-
+
.
.
.
V. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
-Report No. 50-461/90010(DRSS)
License No NPF-62
!
Licensee:
Illinois Power Company 500 South 27th Street
Decatur, IL 62525 q.
Facility Name: Clinton Power Station i
Inspection At: Clinton Site, Clinton, Illinois Inspection Dates: May 7-11, 1900 onsite May 14 and 21, 1990 in NRC Region III office Inspectors:
il /c N-
9d
,,
Physical Security ///j
~
Date Signed
. J. Madeda Inspector-IA M EhAL
? bra?s
-
G. M. Christof fer //(hector Date Signed
/
Physical Security Ins Approved By:
w.,
.
4Md
/Jimes R. Creed, Chief Date Signed
~
hSafeguardsSection Inspection Summary Inspection between May 7-21, 1990 (Report No. 50-461/90010(DRSS))
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced phys' cal security inspection-involving: Management Support, Security Program Plans, and Audits; Protected and Vital Area-Physical Barriers: Detection and Assessment Aids; Protected and Vital Area Access Control of Personnel, Packages and Vehicles; Alarm Stations and Communications: Power Supply; Testing, Maintenance and Compensatory Measures; Security Training and Qualification; TI 2515/102 " Land Vehicle P.omb Contingency Procedure" Verification (SIMS No, MPA L9-07) and review of previous inspection findings.
Results:
Based on the results of this inspection, we have' generally concluded that the reviewed portions of the licensee's physical security program demonstrated the below listed violations:
F.'iclosurs Contains SM'JUARDS INFOPRATION UP D Separation Thia 900716G264 900706
&
{DR ADOCK0500g1 Page Is Deoontrolled
,
l
~ _ - -
~ /q), ' df
..'s
, on
.
,e'
$
.
.
,
Physical Security Program for Power Reactors:
i a.
Isolation Zones:
Failure to maintain a clear area.
(Section5.a)
'
b..
Detection Aids:
Several portions of the intrusion detection system i
were vulnerable to penetration.. (Section 5.b)
'
l c.
Vital Area Access Control of Personnel:
Failure to restrict access
- -
to some vital ~ areas to only authorized individuals.
(Section.5.c)
.
!
f i
.In addition, two weaknesses were identified in the security program in
- i reference to the quality / tracking of the security maintenance program and
'
vital area control program. -(Sections 5.d and e)
The resources devoted to support the security program are adequate.
The staff i
demonstrated good response to issues.through their timely corrective actions.-
i Also, man 3gement's involvement in assuring quality was demonstrated through
the positive actions taken to improve assessment capabilities. However,
'
weaknesses in assuring quality and identification of problems also was evident
"
in the circumstances surrounding the identified violations and weaknesses.
l r
(DETAILS )
f i
!
!
i i
!
<
!
!
i f
.
i
,
' !
t
.
Enclosure Containn SDEUARDS INPOEXATION i
Uo S paration This
Pace 10 Decontrolled-t
-. -.,
,o<_
_ _. -