IR 05000460/1980016
| ML20003E018 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Washington Public Power Supply System |
| Issue date: | 01/07/1981 |
| From: | Dodds R, Hernandez G, Kirsch D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20003E002 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-460-80-16, 50-513-80-16, NUDOCS 8104020079 | |
| Download: ML20003E018 (9) | |
Text
~
.
.
.O-v U,
I.
- UC.~.'.R FICU * T0 *'Y CC '".I 0 !C:*
OF7IC~' 0F :::: 'ECTIO:: '::D E : FORCE!'E!T:'
.
arc:c:: v 50-460/80-16 Raport No.
50-513/80-16 Docket No.
50-460, 50-513
Washington Public Power Supply System P. O. Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 Washington Nuclear Projects Nos.1 and 4 (WNP 1 & 4)
Facility Na=e:
MP 1 a 4 Site, Benton County, Washington Inspection at:
Inspection I:onducted: Decerter 16-19, 1980 J,sA.J.
,$pj' v7' // _
,,, q,. 7 j Y
i Inspectors:
D. F. Kirsch, Reactor Inspector Da:e si:nea
,
G. /Glv. wk I-7-ifI G/ Hernandez, Reae' or Inspector Date signeo t
Date Signed
,N
- <<,tr(/l
,o, _ g/
'
Approved 3y:
der R. T. Ccdds', Chief, Engineering Support Section Date signed Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch
'
Su =ary:
J Inspection during ceriod of December'16-19,1980 (Reports 50-460/80-16 j;;.-
and 50-460/80-16)
Areas Insee ted: Routine unannounced inspection by regional based inspectors or' construction activites including review of licensee action on previous inspection findings, reported 50.55(e) items and IE circulars; review of J. 'A. Jones nonconformance reporting systen; and procedure review, work observation and QA record reviews related to pipe supports and restraints.
,
The inspection involved 56 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC inspectors.
,
Results: _0f the five areas inspected, nc items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in three areas. One apparent item of noncompliance was identified in the area of licensee action on pr,evious inspection findings -
failure to post contractor drawings with WPPSS quality class. One apparent item of noncompliance was identified in the area of pipe supports and restraints - failure of manufacturer's shop to manufacture a pipe support as-required by detail drawing.
810 M
RV Form 219 (2)
-
.... _,
= Mg.4 g_
'
-
-
-
-
.
.
.
.
'
'
CETAILS 1.
Individuals Contacted 11ashinoton Public Pcwer Suoply System (WFPSS)
a.
- D. W. Mazur, Program Director, WilP 1/4
"M. E. Mitherscoon, Director, Ouality Assurance
- T. J. Houchins, Project 0A Manager L. J. Garvin, Panager, OA Enaineering and Systems b.
United Ennineers and Constructors (UE&C)
- G. M. Ahearn, Resident Construction Manager
- S. Loprete, Senior 0A Engineer G. L. Faust, Home Office Liaison OA Engineer R. Sievers, Senior Picino and Mechanical 0A Engineer C. Butler, Senior 0A Engineer c.
J. A. Jcnes Construction-Comoany
- R. 3. Gates, Engineering Manager
,
d.
-Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel (PCM)
C. Bauer, QA Manager
- Danotes exit rc.seting 4tter. Joe.
2.
Licensee Acticn -on Previous Fr.rorcement Items a.
(Closed) (450/79-02-05) Enforcement Item: Procurement documents co not contain or reference the apolicable PSAR recuirements concerning measures for controlling measuring and test eouipment The inspector sampled eight Field Change Notices which revised the applicable specifications to include appropriate reference to Section 17.1.12 of the PSAR for Measurement and Test Equipment.
The measurement and test equipment control system and implementation were examined for J. A. Jones and PDM. The inspector considered the appropriate sections cf the PSAR, ASME B&PV code and the specifications in examination of the follcwing:
.
T
=
m ',-,,
n
.
.
-
-
.
.
__
-
.
.
.
-
.
-2-
,
(1)
J. A. Jones Procedure P0P-N-704W, Revision 4: Calibration and Control of t'easurement and Test Equipment (2) PDM Procedure CP-1: Calibration control (3)
J. A. Jones Procedure ITI-13 describing calibration tcierances and frequency for test equipment (4)
J. A. Jones and PDM test equipment storage areas and various test equipments-therein for compliance with procedural requirements.
(3) Sample of J. A. Jones purchase orders issued for outside laboratory calibration of eouipment.
(G)
J. A. Jones calibration recora system and recall system
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
The inspector observed the following potential problems and brought these to the attention of the licensee.
(1)
J. A. Jones has not provided for documenting the traceability of a particular test device calibratien to the National Bureau-of Standaros.
The Jones Calibration Record System does not provide for the identification of the serial number of the reference standard used to calibrate, or verify calibration of, any particular item of measurement and tast equipment. However, since all J. A. Jcnes reference standards in stock, at present, do have traceability to NBS standards it was concluded that all calibrations performed were traceable to the 'NBS.
(2) Potential exists for error in the calibration / recall system.
The Jones system was observad.to provide for beginning of a calibration period based upon date of equipment issue, regardless
of the date of calibration, necessitating basing the maintenance of the calibration records and recall system on entries in the issue 109. The inspector brought this to the attention of the licensee with the ob:,ervaticn that, while complying with regulatory requirements, the system has a considerable built-in potential for error.
The licensee. stated that the Jones system will be evaluated and revised, as necessary, to provide test equipment traceability to NBS and for the elimination of error potential. This item will be
- examined during a future inspection.
(460/80-16-01)
-
.
.
_
.
.
-3-b.
(Closed) (460/79-02-08) Enforcement Item:
Contractors drawings for alesei generator installation not oosted with WPPSS cuality class (see also IE Insoection Reports 50-460/79-07; 8C 06; 80-06, nacencix B; anc 80-08)
This item was identified in IE inspection report no. 50-460/79-02 and concerned only those drawings supplied by the diesel generator manufacturer. The licensee's failure to effect timely and effective corrective acticn was identified as a concern in IE inspection report no. 50-460/80-06, Appendix B, and as a topic, in the Regional Evaluation of WNP 1/4 Project, which was discussed with licensee managenent on October 9,1980. The fact that the diesel generator centractor's drawings had been corrected to indicate the WPPSS quality class was documented in IE inspection report no. 50-460/80-08 with the stipulation that additional supplier drawings would be examined during a sucsequent inspection.
During this inspection the inspector selected the below listed WPPSS auality class 1, nuclear safety related, contracts and examined a sarole of the contractor drawings for compliance with specification requirements for posting of the WPPSS quality class. All of the below listed specifications require in Section l A, paragrapn 11.2, that "All contractor's drawings submitted shall be posted with the UPPSS Ouality Class as designated in these. documents and as called for on the Engineer's design drawings." Each specification examined was clearly identified as WPPSS Quality Class 1.
(1)- Specification 9779-41: ASME III Valves (a) Supplier Anchor-Darling: designated as contract 41B.
Four contractor-supplied drawings examined: drawing foreign print nos. CS507 Rev. 2; 46164 Rev.1; and 09453 Rev. I were not posted with the WPPSS quality class.
(b) Supplier Yarway: designated as Contract 41G. Two contractor supplied drawings (foreign print nos. 09627 Rev. 3 and 09632 Rev.1) examined, neither of which was posted with the WPPSS quality class.
(2) Soecification 9779-23: Emergency Shutdown Service Water Pumps and Drives:
-Five contractor-supplied drawings examined: foreign print nos. 21216 Rev.1;. 21217 Rev.1;' 21218 Rev. I and 20941 Rev. 3 were not posted with the WPPSS quality class.
.
_.
-
.
.
.
'
4_
-(3) Specification 9779-62: Auxiliary Feedwater and Diesel Fuel Oil Pumos and Drives.
Four contractor-supplied drawings examined: foreign print r.os. 21175 Ray. 1; 21087 Rev. 2 and 20616 Rev. 4 were not posted with the WPPSS quality class.
(4) Specification 9779-113: Emergency Power Sequencer.
Six contractor-supplied drawings examined (foreign print nos. 72580 Rev. 3; 32470 Rev.1; 34510 Rev.1; 32073 Rev. 5; 34172 Rev.1 and 3417: Rev.1) none of which were posted with the WPPSS quaP. s class.
(5) Centractor-suoplied drawings, as indicated, were sampled for the below listed specificatiens and all were found to have been postea witn the WPPSS quality class.
(a). 9779-24A: Two drawings (b) 9779-39A: Two drawings (c) 9779-5S:
Six drawings The failure of contractors to post supplied drawings with the WPPSS quality class-is an apparent violation of specification requirements. (460/80-16-02)
c.
' (Closeal (460/79-10-02) Enforceraent Item:
Failure to adeouately
.<
-
ramove standing water prior to concrete placement
,
'The licensee's response to the -identifiec. discrepancy (letter no.
GCl-8008 dated January 3,1980) was examined and the actions taken
,
were verified to have been accomplished as indicated.
~
AUSH orocedure QCCP-10 (Concrete Placement and Inspection) had been revised to irplement standing water: removal requirements, consolidation device use requirements and concrete personnel
- training. Appropriate inspection criteria had been included in AWSH concrete placement QC-inspection checklists. AWSit training
-
sessions-had been held periodically and surveilled by UE&C perscnnel.
The inspector had no further questions.
L
3
-
,
r-,
,,, -
-
, + -
,
n
-- - -
,v--
,
.
.
,
.
.
-5-d.
(Ocen) (460/79-13-02) Enforcement Item: Excessive weld weave winth on certain welds cerformed by J. A. Jones The licensee's response to the item identified was submitted by letter no. G01-80-79 dated February 19, 1980. The inspector, while conducting examinations to verify the imolementation of the licensee's stated corrective actions, determined that the actual corrective actions acccmolished differed from those stated by the licensee to be the corrective actions taken and the results achieved. For example, the two nonconformance reports identified by the licensee did not pertain to the identified noncompliance and the resinspection.of all stainless. steel welds welded by the SMAW process had not been accceplished.
The inscector requested that the licensee submit a revised response to. the. notice or violation to accurately cocument the actual corrective actions taken and results acnieved.
3.
Licensee Action on 50.55(e) Items Deficient Emeraency Core Cooling Makeuo Pumo Soeed Increaser Sucoorts The final.' eport'was suomitted by licensee letter no. G01-79-533 dated r
.0ctober 18,1979. -The licensee's actions to resolve the deficiency were examined and appeared to be as specified. The inspector had no further questions.
4.
Licensee Action on IE Circulars (Closed) Circular 77-05: Licu~id Entrapment in Valve Bonnets The inspector cetermined that the licensee had taken; appropriate
-
actions to evaluate the circular for applicability to the WNP 1/4 project and resolve' discrepancies identified. This circular is
~
closed.
5.
Nonconformance Reportino system The inspector. examined the J. A. Jones nonconformance reporting system
.fortconfctrance-to the 'PSAR (Section 17.4.15) Land specification 9779-211,- Section 1B, which passed on the PSAR requirements. The following
' documents were exanined for compliance with the above criteria.
a.
- J. A. Jones Cornorate. Nuclear. Quality Assurance !!anual for AStiE Section III,'Section XIV: Nonconformances
' b.'
'J. A. Jones procedure L no. - P0P-N-703W:
Nonconformance Reporting
1
-
.
.
,
.
-6-I c.
J. A. Jones procedure no. P0P-N-707W: Site Inspection and Test
,
d.
Approximately 150 J. A. Jones generated inspection reports.
The following observation was brought to the licensee's attention.
a.
The Jones Nuclear OA Manual,Section XIV, Paragraphs 5.1.2 and 5.1.3, procedure P0P-N-703W, paragraoh 7.2, and procedure PCP-N-707W provide that a nonconformance report, or inspection report, be reviewed by the QV Supervisor to verify, among other things, that the report actually constitutes a nonconforming condition orior to the looging and entry of the report into the system.
Acparently, if the OV Sucervisor feels that the condition is not a nonconformance, tne report may be destroyed. The inspector pointed out that tne system, as constituted, was not auditable or verifiable to assure tnat the OV Supervisor's decisions were anpropriate since no recora of the determination or basis would exist.
The licensee committeo to evaluate the system and revise the implementing procedures appropriately.
In aadition, the licensee noted that the nonconformance reporting systems of other site contractors would be made consistent with those evaluation results. This item will be examined during a future inspection.
(460/80-16-03)
6.
' Safety Related Pipe Supcort and Restraint Systems a.
Revirm of OA Imolemenr.ing Procedures (J. A. Jones)_
'
The insoector examined the following contractor (J. A. Jones) and
'
licensee procedures for ccmpliance with specificaticn and ASME MPV. code. requirements regarding pipe supports and restraints.
(1) JAJ-UI-007, Revision 4: Control and Distribution of Welding Filler Metal (2)-JAJ-UI-10.1,RevisionIF: ASME -III Hanger Installation (3) JAJ-UI-Oll, Revision 40: Supplementary Support Steel (4) JAJ-WI-016.1, P.evision 0:
ASME III Large Bore ~ Pipe Installation (5) JAJ-ITI-005, Revision 28: ' Inspection Instruction for Hanger Supports and Restraints 4 P_
-
k
h' t 'hd
@+e+(g,
%'+4
/4
'
s
..e... <e 1,.
TEST TARGET (MT-3)
'
.
i t
1.0 5 Ha BM y @ LE
-
I.I
[m L32 J
M l.25 IA 1.6
/
-
e
=
b
- %3,,
/<4
'
%
_
.
$A), j)
//
pp
!
_
-
_
,.
-~
e,S)%p
%<g'+
e =A
-
$*
_ e.. _ _
TEST TARGET (MT-3)
.
l.0 582 EM
-- p '
Na j
<
1.l
,E 5 lille
..<
,
Ja 1.25ji.4 gi.6
'/
6"
>
4%
/4
$k$$
'
/
_
-
.
-
.
_
__
-
.
.
,
,
.
'
-7-
-(6)
JAJ-?l0E-008, Revision 6: Visual Weld Inspection (7)'
JAJ-i!DE-010, Revision 3: Visual Inspection of Structural and Hanger Welds (8)-
Specification 9779-257, Revision 0: ASME III Piping Fabricaticn cnd Installation
(9)
Specification 9779-211, Revision 0: ASME III Piping Fabrication and Installation
,
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
ihe inscector noted that the contractor is in the process of drciting procedures for the installation and inspection of snubbers and spring cans.. The contractor has_ not yet received any safety-related snubbers or spring cans onsite (other than the large steam generator snubbers).
b.
~ 0bservation of' Work and Work Activities i
Tha inspector selected six-(6) installed. fixed pipe supports of l
- different load ratings to ascertain by visual examination whether the pipe supports met the requirements specified by the licensee's drawings, procedures, specifications, and the ASME code. The following Unit 1 pipe supports were examined:
,
-
Pine Suoport Mumoer
.t.ocation CC'!-210-SG-103 General' Service Bldg.
'
CCW-210-SH-104 General Service Bldg.
- CCW-311-SG-3 General Service Bldg.
'
.CCW-54-SG-102 Containment
.CCW-54-SG-103 LContainment t
'
CCU-54-SG-106 Containment-
,
- All supports were ASME Class-2 or 3 linear type supports, WFPSS Ouality Class I, and had been completed through preliminary acceptance by.-
Quality Verification. All of the supports Lappeared'to meet
' the requirements,;except support no. CCW-54-SG-106..
-
! Support CCH-54-SG-106 had shop welds which did not ccnform to the -
. applicable pipe support detail drawing. The shop welds on the top
-
team wall. attachment plate of the support were reversed frcm what was required by the hanger detail drawing.. It appeared-that the -
!
weld configuration could' adversely affect the load carrying capabilities-of the support.
.
--.
-
-.
- - -
- -
. _
_.
.
.
-
.
.
.
,
,
.
-8-
,
,
This support was ranufactured by Fuico, Incorporated, and had been shoo inscected and accepted on April 24, 1979. This appears to be an item of noncompliance.
(460/80-16-04)
Eyanination of Jones procedure no. CAJ-ITI-005 (Inspection Instruction for Hangers, Suoports and Festraints) indicates that the procedure does not specifically exclude shoo fabrications from the Jones inspection orogran. Further crecence is given to this conclusion-by the Jones Hanger Inspection checklist which in Item IV,
'
subitem 1, requires the Jones QV inspector to verify " Hanger complete per detail." The hanger details include shoo and field fabrications.
Discussions with licensee and' Jones personnel indicate that the-procecure was intenceo to acoly only to-Jones field fabrications.
Tha systen ecoloyea by Jones anc tne licensee for receiving inspection of itens receivec from a material manufacturer and material sucplier will be examinec curing a future inspection. -(460/80-16-05)
,
c.
Review of Ouality Recorcs The inspector reviewed the quality records of the pipe supports listed above for compliance with licensee procedures, specifications i
and code requirements. The records reviewed included pipe support detail drawings, code data reports, hanger inspection cnecklists, hanger iiDE/ weld records, nonconforrance reports and procurement and test equipment usage logs.
Mo Litems of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
'
7.
' Exit Interview
,
The inspectors met with licensee representatives, denoted in paragraph 1, at the conclusion of the inspection on December 19,1980 to summarize the inspection scope and findings. The licensee acknowledged the apparent items of ncncompliance. (soe paragraphs _2.b. and 6.b.).
+
-
-
, - _
,
.
,,_
. -. -
-
. - - -
, -
,
-~
.